21
October 7, 2003 Propulsion PDR 1 Team 5 Propulsion PDR Team 5 Propulsion PDR Scott Bird Mike Downes Kelby Haase Grant Hile Cyrus Sigari Sarah Umberger Jen Watson

Propulsion QDR

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Propulsion QDR. Scott Bird Mike Downes Kelby Haase Grant Hile Cyrus Sigari Sarah Umberger Jen Watson. Preview. Choice of Engine Redesigning of Propeller Manufactured Choice Cruise Conditions. Constraining Conditions. SHP constraint = 4.08 SHP design =5.0. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Propulsion QDR

October 7, 2003 Propulsion PDR 1

Team 5 Propulsion PDRTeam 5 Propulsion PDR

• Scott Bird• Mike Downes• Kelby Haase• Grant Hile• Cyrus Sigari• Sarah Umberger• Jen Watson

Page 2: Propulsion QDR

October 7, 2003 Propulsion PDR 2

PreviewPreview

• Engine Selection

• Propeller Sizing

• Manufactured Choice

Page 3: Propulsion QDR

October 7, 2003 Propulsion PDR 3

Constraining ConditionsConstraining Conditions

• SHPconstraint = 4.08

• SHPdesign=5.0

Page 4: Propulsion QDR

October 7, 2003 Propulsion PDR 4

Preliminary Choice for EnginePreliminary Choice for Engine

• BME-50

• Power = 5.0hp

• RPM: 1200-10,000

• Weight = 3.25 lbs.

Page 5: Propulsion QDR

October 7, 2003 Propulsion PDR 5

Propeller SizingPropeller Sizing

• Used modified gold.m code

• Varied Pitch and Propeller Diameter

• Assume RPM = 7000

• Assume Velocity = 50 ft/s

http://www.danspropshop.com/pitch.html

Page 6: Propulsion QDR

October 7, 2003 Propulsion PDR 6

Propeller SizingPropeller Sizing

• Coefficient of Thrust vs. Advance Ratio

Page 7: Propulsion QDR

October 7, 2003 Propulsion PDR 7

Propeller SizingPropeller Sizing

• Coefficient of Power vs. Advance Ratio

Page 8: Propulsion QDR

October 7, 2003 Propulsion PDR 8

Propeller SizingPropeller Sizing

• Efficiency vs. Advance Ratio

Page 9: Propulsion QDR

October 7, 2003 Propulsion PDR 9

Propeller SizingPropeller Sizing

• Efficiency vs. Power Output

Blue: Increasing Pitch

Black: Increasing Diameter

Page 10: Propulsion QDR

October 7, 2003 Propulsion PDR 10

Propeller SizingPropeller Sizing

• Efficiency vs. Power Output

Diameter = 25”

Pitch = 6”

Page 11: Propulsion QDR

October 7, 2003 Propulsion PDR 11

Propeller SizingPropeller Sizing

• Efficiency vs. Power Output at 7000RPM

• Pitch = 6 in.• Diameter = 25 in.• J = 0.2057/rev• η = 51%• Power = 4.71 hp

• CT = 0.034

• CP = 0.0139

• Velocity = 50 ft/s

Page 12: Propulsion QDR

October 7, 2003 Propulsion PDR 12

Propeller SizingPropeller Sizing

• Used second modification of gold.m code

• Held Pitch constant at 6 inches and Diameter constant at 25 inches

• Assume Velocity = 50 ft/s

• Varied RPM

Page 13: Propulsion QDR

October 7, 2003 Propulsion PDR 13

Propeller SizingPropeller Sizing

• Efficiency vs. Advance Ratio

Page 14: Propulsion QDR

October 7, 2003 Propulsion PDR 14

Propeller SizingPropeller Sizing

• Coefficient of Thrust vs. Advance Ratio

Page 15: Propulsion QDR

October 7, 2003 Propulsion PDR 15

Propeller SizingPropeller Sizing

• Coefficient of Power vs. Advance Ratio

Page 16: Propulsion QDR

October 7, 2003 Propulsion PDR 16

Propeller SizingPropeller Sizing

• Maximum Efficiency at Cruise is 3800 RPM

• At Maximum Efficiency of Cruise – CT = 0. 0145

• At Maximum Efficiency – CP = 0.0078

Page 17: Propulsion QDR

October 7, 2003 Propulsion PDR 17

Propeller SelectionPropeller Selection

• Chose propeller from available stock at www.BMEengines.com

• Comparison of available propellers to Efficiency graph, chose a 22 in. X 8 in. propeller

Page 18: Propulsion QDR

October 7, 2003 Propulsion PDR 18

Propeller SelectionPropeller Selection

• New Propeller – 22 in. X 8 in.• At 7000 RPM

– J = 0.234

– CP = 0.022

– CT = 0.048

– η = 50%

• At Cruise, best RPM = 3300

Page 19: Propulsion QDR

October 7, 2003 Propulsion PDR 19

Summary Summary

• Diameter of propeller = 22 inches• Pitch of propeller = 8 inches• Efficiency of propeller = 50%

• Still to Come– Geometric Properties such as airfoil section, twist

distribution, chord distribution and shape

– Trade studies of effect of AR and CLmax on Power Loading

Page 20: Propulsion QDR

October 7, 2003 Propulsion PDR 20

QuestionsQuestions

• Questions??

Page 21: Propulsion QDR

October 7, 2003 Propulsion PDR 21

Engine StudyEngine Study

Power Output vs. Weight

012345678

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Weight (lbs)

Pow

er O

utpu

t (hp

)