Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Language: English
Original: English
PROJECT: STRENGTHENING CLIMATE RESILIENCE
IN THE KAFUE BASIN
COUNTRY: ZAMBIA
Project Appraisal Report
Technical Annexes Vol. II of II
August 2013
Appraisal Team
Team Leader: Kisa Mfalila, Environmental Specialist, OSAN.4
Team Members: Léandre Gbéli, Agriculture Economist, OSAN.4
Lawrence Kiggundu, Infrastrucure Specialist, OITC.2
Lewis Bangwe, Agriculture Expert, ZMFO
Natan Jere, Procurement Specialist, SARC
Owusu Agyei, Finan. Mgt Specialist, SARC/ORPF.2
Sector Director: Beileh Abdirahaman
Regional Director: Chiji Ojukwu
Peer Reviewers
Peter Akari, Chief Water Policy Officer, AWF
Walter Odhiambo, Chief Development Policy Economist, ORPC1
Jean-Louis Kromer, Principal Nat. Resources Mngt Officer, OSAN4
Mam Tut Wadda-Senghore, Senior Transport Engineer, OITC.2
Yappy Silungwe, Senior Irrigation Engineer, OSAN.3
Cesar Tique, Agriculture and Rural Development Expert, MZFO
Paxina Chileshe-Toe, Climate Change Specialist, IFAD
2
- 3 -
A. ZAMBIA’S DEVELOPMENT AGENDA AND SECTOR BRIEF
Zambia’s Development Agenda and Donor Support
Low levels of economic diversification
High cost of Financial services
Fiscal deficits
Unemployment
Poorly developed markets and linkages
Poor infrastructure
Limited access to Land
Challenges and Constraints
SNDP
Pillars
Zambia Development
Agenda
Donor’s Support
By Sector By Aid Modality
Macroeconomics
and Governance
(40%)
Infrastructure
(30%)
DBS + SBS
(61%)
Project Support
(39%)
Policy-Institutional Reforms
Public sector
Financial sector
Governance
Private sector
Decentralisation
Public Investments
Infrastructure and ICT
Energy, Transport, Agriculture
Manufacturing, Mining
Tourism
Human Capital
Health and Education and Skills
HIV/AIDS and Gender
Water and Sanitation
Donor Support = 17.4% of Budget (According to 2013 budget and MTEF 2013-2015)
Eco
nom
ic Dev
elop
men
t
Govern
an
ce
Hu
ma
n C
ap
ital
Delivering Inclusive Development
and Social Justice
Sustained Economic Growth and Poverty
Reduction
Broad-based Pro-poor Growth,
Employment Creation Infrastructure and Human Development
Short-Medium
Term
High Cost of Doing Business
High levels of corruption
Low competitiveness
Weak institutional Capacity
Inefficiencies in Public Expenditure Management
Prevalence of Aids
Low quality of human capital
Human Capital
(30%)
- 4 -
ANNEX A : COUNTRY’S DEVELOPMENT AGENDA, SECTOR
BRIEF AND DONOR’S SUPPORT
1. Agriculture: The agriculture sector in Zambia is highly vulnerable to climate change
and variability due to a high reliance on farming for livelihoods, which is predominantly
small-scale and rainfed. The main crops are maize (a staple for Zambian diet), cassava,
sorghum, wheat, rice, groundnuts and high-valued crops such as cotton, sugarcane and
tobacco. Zambia’s recurrent droughts and floods have caused widespread crop failure in the
past, in high rainfall years due to water logging and erosion, and in dry years by delaying the
onset and length of the growing season. During the 2004/05 drought for example, nearly two
thirds of the country received little or no rainfall, affecting even large-scale cotton and
tobacco production. Significant rainfall deficits and/or flash floods during critical periods of
crop growth have also frequently led to decline agriculture productivity, with consequent
impact on food security and nutrition. The rising temperatures are expected to further
increase the outbreak of plant and livestock diseases. Findings from a study carried out by the
University of Zambia and the Center for Environmental Economics and Policy in Africa
suggested that an increase in mean temperatures during November-December and a reduction
in mean precipitation during January-February would impact negatively on the net farm
revenues.
2. Infrastructure: Zambia has a relatively low degree of infrastructure development,
only 19 percent of the population has access to electricity, 78 percent of the roads are
unpaved, and less than 10 percent of the population has access to telecommunication. The
current level of infrastructure development makes it difficult for this land-locked country to
compete with its neighboring countries, and therefore the Government of Zambia has
assigned a high priority to infrastructure and telecommunication development on its Sixth
National Development Plan. Yet both existing as well as planned infrastructure are at risk
from climate change: past floods have caused significant damage: the 2007 floods, for
example, destroyed roads and bridges, forcing the Government to invest US$39 million to
buy earthmoving equipment to clear blocked roads. Extreme weather events such as
rainstorms make travelling dangerous and are likely to do so and also add to road damage.
Rising temperatures are also likely to lead to warping of the country’s important railway
lines. In general, the safety standards under which the infrastructure assets were originally
built no longer conform to expected extremes in weather conditions, and therefore will need
to be revised. It is critical to invest in incentives to strengthen operation and maintenance
(O&M), a major cause of transport infrastructure collapse. Zambia has had good recent
experience with performance based contracts, where payments for road rehabilitation are
deferred for a number of years and paid upon solid evidence of O&M.
3. Natural Resources: Natural resources in Zambia - including wildlife, forests and
fisheries–are already being affected by climate variability combined with unsustainable
practices, which lead to land degradation, loss of soil fertility and wildfires. Drought
conditions and reduced soil moisture stress wildlife populations, forcing them to migrate to
areas where they are more vulnerable to poaching and predation. Conversely, high rainfall
events can flood the preferred habitat of wetland animals such as waterbucks, puku and
lechwe. Changes in rainfall intensity also modify the nutrient levels of rivers and lakes,
critical fisheries habitats on which much of the Zambezi floodplain population depends. The
NAPA reports that under a scenario of low rainfall (500 mm), high temperature (20 o C) and
- 5 -
fewer(50) rainy days, the unique Miombo habitat cover may decrease by 50%. Adaptation
strategies should therefore aim at reducing the rate of deforestation, introduce conservation
farming and provide alternative sources of household energy.
3. Water and Energy: Zambia has a highly diverse and extensive river system along
with water bodies covering as much as 6 percent of its land area. Even though water
availability so far exceeds consumptive use - even during drought years – conditions vary
significantly across the country and some areas (particularly agro-ecological region I)
experience water deficits during dry periods. Secondary impacts from reduced water
availability include Secretariatnutrition and water-borne diseases. During drought events,
tourism can also be affected due to wildlife mortality and reduced water flows to Victoria
Falls. Zambia’s energy strategy envisages a significant new investment in hydropower, to
complement investments made in the 1970s in the Kafue River Basin, such as Ithezi-tezhi
dam (capacity 120 Megawatt) and Kafue Gorge Upper Dam complex (990 MW capacity). In
particular, Zambia’s Electricity Supply Corporation (ZESCO) plans a major investment on
the Kafue Gorge Lower dam (750 MW planned capacity). Climate change modeling
completed under the IFC study (IFC, 2011) indicate that reductions in water supply by early
to mid-century could reduce power generation in the Kafue Basin by 2-22 percent. By end-
century, however, given expected higher river flows, the impact could become positive under
an A2 ECHAM scenario (+11.7%) or continue to be negative under a B1 scenario (-8.8
percent). Overall, the combination of climate change and continued demands on water supply
could reduce the investment’s financial feasibility on Kafue Gorge Lower to levels below 20
percent, the benchmark generally required by investors. Of particular concern are the
financial risks to ZESCO associated with droughts – about US$2.6-5.8 million USD/year, or
0.3-0.7% of the expected total ZESCO revenue for the Kafue Gorge system. Given the
interdependency of water availability to ZESCO and future demand (namely for agriculture
and consumption), the IFC study proposed four key adaptation strategies: (a) implement
agriculture adaptation strategies; (b) support a comprehensive study of water management
and use throughout the Kafue Basin; (c) maintain active partnerships with water users; and
(d) promote public education and outreach on efficient irrigation methods.
4. The Zambian economy is predominantly dependent on exploitation of its natural
resources particularly mining and increasingly forestry. Agriculture is predominantly rainfed
and over half of the areas in south-east are cultivated. Despite favourable economic
development trends, poverty levels in Zambia did not decrease significantly. Overall poverty
levels reduced from 73 percent in 1998 to 61 percent in 2012. The improvement occurred
mainly in urban areas, while rural poverty levels remained around 77%. This underlines the
fact that improvement in macro-economic performance has not yet translated into significant
gains in social and human development indicators. Recent data from the World Food
Program reveals that poor agricultural diversification and market distortions led to an
increase of the undernourished population by 131% since 1990, afflicting now 47.4 percent
of the population. Furthermore, the trend of inequalities in incomes is on the rise. The Gini
coefficient rose from 0.60 in 2006 to 0.65 in 2010. Unemployment levels, especially among
the youth, deteriorated from 22 percent in 2005 to 28 percent in 2010. Over 95 percent of
those employed in 2010 were in low productive inforSecretariat sector.
5. Indicators of Vulnerability: Table 1 highlights some of the vulnerability indicators
of the target districts, compared to the national average. The total population of the target
districts is 1,772,000 (295,000 households), according to the 2010 census. Four of the target
districts – Mumbwa, Itezhi Tezhi, Kafue and Kalomo have growth rates above national
- 6 -
average. The population density of Namwala, Choma, Kafue, Monze, Mazabuka and
Chibombo is also above national average. This puts pressure on natural and economic
resources in these districts. Six of the districts have per capita income below national average.
Between 2006 and 2008, 444,624 households in 21 districts in Zambia were seriously
affected by floods that disrupted livelihood systems. Eight of these districts are in the Kafue
basin and targeted under the project. These contributed 230,223 households (52%) of the total
affected households.
Table 1: Indicators of Vulnerability of Target Districts
Indicator Nam
wala
Mu
mb
wa
Itezhitezh
i
Ch
om
a
Kafu
e
Mo
nze
Mazab
uka
Ch
ibo
mb
o
Kalo
mo
Zam
bia
Population (000) 98.8 210.8 63.0 238.3 219.0 183.8 221.9 290.5 246.2
Growth rate 2.2 3.6 4.8 1.9 4.2 1.6 1.3 2.3 4.4 2.8
Population density 23.3 10.7 4.3 34.0 24.2 39.5 37.0 22.6 17.2 17.4
HDI (2007) 0.519 0.509 0.503 0.502 0.485 0.485 0.479 0.435 0.409 0.491
Income index 0.177 0.202 0.177 0.247 0.215 0.199 0.198 0.137 0.138 0.208
Per capita income (USD)
288.6 334.9 288.6 438.8 362.6 330.3 328.1 227.7 228.0 347.4
HIV Prevalence 7.5 11.6 7.5 19.2 22.4 19.2 22.5 11.6 18.6 14.4
Stunting rate for under 5 children
30.4 8.1 31.9 50.4 39.8 41.0 55.4 5.7 17.5 49.8
Flood affected population (2008)
28,813 - 14,504 36,170 27,934 31,627 39,009 18,802 33,364 444,624
Sources: Zambia 2007 Human Development Report, Zambia 2010 Census of Population and Housing, and Flood Recovery Action
Plan, 2008
6. Sectoral policies: Agriculture constitutes about 19 percent of Zambia’s Gross
Domestic Product (GDP), and provides approximately 65 percent of employment. Zambia
has approximately 233,850 square kilometres of agricultural land, or 31.5 percent of the total
land area. Of that, 4.5 percent is classified as arable land. The country has over 105 billion
cubic meters of renewable water resources available, of which 2 percent is withdrawn
annually. Of the total water withdrawn each year, around 76 percent is used in the
agricultural sector. Although the agriculture sector is heavily supported by government
through maize subsidies, critical areas of investment have been neglected for several years.
Without effective extension services and access to inputs such as fertilizers and seed stock,
sSecretariatl-scale farmers have fallen back onto subsistence farming, often struggling to
meet their food needs. Investments in irrigation, livestock, marketing, processing, research
and extension have lagged behind. This neglect led to the spread of cattle diseases and a
decline in crop diversification. This has put pressure on natural resources as people have
resorted to unsustainable methods of harvesting forests and wildlife to supplement their
failing food systems. Given this scenario, the Government’s overarching goal, as indicated in
Vision 2030, is to become a “prosperous middle-income country by the year 2030”, with a
competitive and outward oriented economy, where hunger is eradicated and poverty is
reduced to minimal levels (GRZ, 2006). Towards this vision, the Fifth National Development
Plan (FNDP) was implemented between 2006 and 2010. It generated macroeconomic
stability, economic growth, infrastructure development, maternal and infant mortality rates
- 7 -
reduction and increased education enrolment. The Sixth National Development Plan (SNDP:
2011 to 2015) is aimed at consolidating the FNDP gains. SNDP (2011-2015) seeks to sustain
economic growth, poverty reduction, creation of employment, policies, strategies and
programmes to generate broad-based pro-poor growth, employment and human development.
SNDP’s objective is to “accelerate infrastructure development, economic growth and
diversification, promote rural investments, accelerate poverty reduction and enhance human
development”. It identifies agriculture (crops, livestock, forestry and fisheries), mining,
tourism, manufacturing and commerce and trade as priority growth sectors.
7. SNDP (2011-2015) prioritizes agriculture as the key sector in achieving sustainable
economic growth and in reducing poverty in Zambia due to the country’s rich endowment in
natural resources (especially arable land) and dependency of 70 percent of the rural
population on agricultural related activities and livelihoods. The National Agriculture
Investment Plan (NAIP) under the SNDP (2011-2015) has been developed to, (i) diversify
and attain national and household food security, (ii) promote soil management for sustainable
agricultural production and growth, (iii) promote the development of competitive, efficient
and transparent public and private sector driven marketing system for agriculture
commodities and inputs, (iv) increase quality livestock numbers, (v) expand both domestic
and international market access for livestock, (vi) promote fish trade and marketing, and (vii)
promote sustainable exploitation of fisheries resources and increase fish production.
8. Natural Resources sector: Forest cover in Zambia is approximately 50 million
hectares, consisting primarily of miombo woodland (approximately 60% of the land), and
mopane woodlands, evergreen and deciduous forests, some of which provide habitat to
wildlife. Deforestation, already occurring at estimated annual rates of 250,000 – 300,000
hectares, is attributable to i) charcoal and wood fuel use; ii) timber production; and iii)
unsustainable agricultural methods and other land use practices, particularly shifting
cultivation. Climate change will affect the growth, composition and regeneration capacity of
forests, thereby resulting in reduced biodiversity and ability to deliver important forest goods
and services. Vegetation types and species composition will also be affected with the
emergence of invasive species.
9. Wildlife resources play a very important role in the national economy as it supports
tourism which, in 2008 contributed 3% to the country’s GDP and is considered as a major
potential growth engine for years to come. The open and closed grasslands and forests
constitute the natural habitats of endemic species and other large wild animals including
lions, buffaloes and elephants. Water animals like hippo and crocodile and a variety of bird
species also inhabit the rivers, lakes and other wetland ecosystems. Climate change will
reduce soil moisture content, which in turn will affect fodder productivity and consequently
affect wildlife, leading to migration and wildlife-human conflicts. Excessive rainfall will lead
to inundation of swamps and other wetlands, thus affecting the habitat of important wetland
species such as the puku, lechwe, waterbuck, etc.
10. Climate Change: Interventions in the environment sector are articulated in the
National Policy on Environment (NPE) and underpinned by other Multilateral Environment
Agreements (MEAs) such as the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), the Convention
to Combat Desertification and the Ramsar Convention. In all sectors, policies are guided both
by domestic development priorities and by Zambia’s obligations to international and regional
agreements. Zambia ratified the UNFCCC in 1993, and under this convention is obliged to
provide national communications. The first such communication was produced in 2004 while
- 8 -
the second is not yet in the public domain, but has been underway since 2008 (through a
UNDP/GEF funded project). As a then least developed country (LDC), Zambia also
submitted a National Adaptation Plan of Action (NAPA) to the UNFCCC in 2007. The
NAPA prioritised 10 adaptation projects, of which one is being funded and implemented (see
Section 4.3; GRZ, 2007). Zambia has also ratified the Convention on Biodiversity, the
Convention to Combat Desertification and the Non-Legally Binding Instrument on all types
of forest, conventions that have synergies with efforts to address climate change. It is also
part of the Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa (COMESA) and the Southern
African Development Community (SADC), and participation in these regional institutions
includes commitments to sustainable utilisation of natural resources and protection of the
environment, including with reference to climate change. A National Adaptation Programme
of Action was formulated in 2007 to guide interventions.
11. Zambia’s climate is highly variable and over the last few decades has experienced
series of climatic extremes, e.g. droughts, seasonal floods and flash floods, extreme
temperatures and dry spells, many of these with increased frequency, intensity and
magnitude. Their impacts on the country are evident in climate-induced changes to physical
and biological systems which increasingly exert considerable stress on the country’s
vulnerable sectors, especially agriculture. The adverse impact climate change on food and
water security, water quality, energy and the sustainable livelihoods of rural communities
coupled with poverty also limit economic development.
12. In 2012, Zambia developed a National Climate Change Response Strategy (NCCRS)
that recognizes the negative impacts of climate change on water resources, agriculture,
livestock, forestry and fisheries, tourism and wildlife resources. It also affects infrastructure
and housing, provision of energy and on the health status of citizens. A 2011 study on the
economic impacts of climate change in Zambia estimated GDP loss through loss of
agricultural productivity and its associated effects on poverty levels, the potential impact of
an energy crisis related to power generation, the higher costs of treating climate related
diseases such as Secretariataria and Secretariatnutrition, and the loss of natural environments
which provide critical services to urban, peri-urban, and rural communities. Basically, GDP
loss over a 10-year period was estimated at about USD 5 Billion, with the agricultural sector
shouldering about half of this loss. Natural resources, energy and health are also expected to
be severely hit. A 2009 Water Sector study funded by the World Bank concluded that
extreme weather events such as floods, droughts and heavy rainfall have cost Zambia some
0.4% of annual economic growth. Without action, rainfall variability alone could lead to
losses of 0.9% of GDP growth over the next decade, keeping an additional 300,000 Zambians
below the poverty line.
13. The Vision of the NCCRS is a climate-resilient, low emission prosperous economy
by 2030 that will have significantly increased living standards of the population and
reduced its vulnerability to the impacts of climate change and variability. The Vision
specifically recognizes the fact that only rapid and sustained development, focusing on
poverty alleviation, can generate the required financial, technological and human resources to
deal with climate change effectively. It is consistent with Zambia’s current development
policies and strategies, including the Sixth National Development Plan (SNDP) and the
National Long Term Vision 2030 (NLTV) which aims to make Zambia “a prosperous
middle-income country by the year 2030”.
- 9 -
14. Zambia is also working with UNEP, UNDP and FAO to develop a national program
to reduce GHG emissions through forest activities. A national plan for REDD+ in Zambia has
been under development since 2010 and is expected to be publically released later in 2013. In
this context, progress has been made on technical issues such as monitoring, reporting and
verification of emission reductions within the Department of Forestry. REDD+ activities
build on and support the Zambian National Forest Monitoring System which aims to be a
decentralised system with ten provincial forest monitoring laboratories with appropriate
technology and technical expertise. Training efforts engaged Brazil’s National Institute for
Space Research (INPE) to facilitate the development of a land cover classification system
that learns from that of the Terra Amazon Platform. A country-wide Integrated Land Use
Assessment is in its second phase with more than 4000 sampling sites and the UN-REDD
activities operate in close collaboration with this FAO and Finland supported initiative (UN-
REDD, 2012).
15. The Ministry of Lands, Natural Resources and Environmental Protection (MLNREP)
is the lead technical focal point on natural resources, environment and climate change work.
The MLNREP also provides a secretariat for the Designated National Authority for the Clean
Development Mechanism (CDM) and is responsible for Zambia’s National Communications
to the UNFCCC, although ZEMA is conducting the analysis. In addition to the MLNREP, the
Ministry of Finance (MoF), and the Disaster Management Mitigation Unit (DMMU) in the
Office of the Vice President, have assumed central roles in Zambia’s climate change
response. Notably, the Pilot Programme for Climate Resilience (PPCR) is managed within
the MoFNP and not in the MTENR.
16. The DMMU reports to a committee of permanent secretaries and passes on
recommendations to cabinet for approval. It also has structures at provincial level, but at
district level works through existing district councils. There is clear recognition of the link
between DRR and adaptation to climate change. The Disaster Management Act of 2010 also
has key links with Zambia’s climate change response (GRZ, 2010c). The Act creates the
Disaster Management and Mitigation Unit (DMMU) within the Office of the Vice President.
It seeks to address all disasters, including those relating to climate change. The Act also lays
out Disaster Management Plans. Zambia’s medium term goal is to mainstream climate
change in most vulnerable sectors of the economy by 2015 and into all by 2030
17. Country Dialogue and Donor Support: GRZ engages in dialogue with Cooperating
Partners (CPs) under the guidance of the aid effectiveness principles embodied in the Paris
Declaration (PD) and Accra Agenda for Action (AAA) as well as Millennium Development
Goal 8, “Develop a Global Partnership for Development.” All the efforts pertaining to donor
coordination ultimately aim to enhance the GRZ’s leadership and ownership of donor funds
with the end goal of improving overall service delivery.. To facilitate this dialogue, the CPs
have signed a Joint Assistance Strategy for Zambia (JASZ II) that outlines the necessary
actions needed to improve on mutual accountability and the aid effectiveness agenda. The
JASZ II emphasizes managing and monitoring Official Development Aid in ways that focus
on desired results rather than just outputs. In recognition of the significance of non-traditional
donors, the GRZ has continued to strengthen its cooperation with non-OECD donors such as
Brazil, China, Egypt, India, Russia, Saudi Arabia and Turkey. JASZ was signed by 10 major
donors, founded on the principles of strengthening local ownership of the development
process and enhancing aid effectiveness and mutual accountability in the spirit of
international agreements - Monterrey Consensus on Financing for Development (2002), the
Rome Declaration on Aid Harmonization (2003), the Marrakesh Agreement on Managing
- 10 -
Results for Development (2004), and the Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness (2005).
JASZ is a unique document in the history of aid cooperation in Zambia and represents DPs
collective response to the country’s Vision 2030, the National Development Plans and NAPS,
which constitute the national framework for reducing poverty and promoting sustainable
development. The Bank has remained an active participant in the Cooperating Partners
Group, Agriculture, Transport, Water and Sanitation, Governance, Social sector and
Environment and Natural Resources.
18. The Bank’s development assistance to Zambia is within the framework of its 2011 -
2015 Country Strategy Paper (CSP), approved by the Board of Directors in December 2010.
In 2012, the Bank undertook Mid-Term Review (MTR) of this strategy. This allowed the
alignment of the priority areas of the Bank’s strategy with the priorities of the new Zambian
Government and to incorporate issues of inclusive and green growth to ensure that the Bank’s
collaboration with the GRZ follows the new Long Term Strategy (LTS) of the Bank. This
also enabled the Bank to harmonize the CSP with key Government policy and development
frameworks such National Vision 2030, the Sixth National Development Plan (SNDP) 2011-
2015 and Medium Term Expenditure Frameworks (MTEF). The CSP (2011-2015) spans
through two ADF cycles – ADF-12 and 13. Under ADF-12, the Performance-Based
Allocation (PBA) for the two initial years (2011 and 2012) was UA 70.07 million. Zambia’s
ADF-12 allocation for 2013 is UA 37.95 million, bringing total allocation of ADF 12th
replenishment cycle for Zambia to UA 108.02 million. This represents a net decrease of UA
10.88 million compared to the UA 118.9 million of ADF-11. This trend reflects the country’s
continuous positive GDP growth, which partly has a decreasing effect on the PBA formula,
and offsets the positive contributions to the formula of the improved portfolio performance
and Country Policy and Institutional Assessment (CPIA). The Bank’s Country Office used
this meager ADF allocation to leverage other resources. During the first CSP implementation
period, the total committed resources amounted to UA 128 million, of which UA 62 million
were from ADF-12, and UA 66.4 million from other internal sources, achieving a leverage
rate of 107%.
- 11 -
B. BACKUP OF THE KEY ARGUMENTS OF THE REPORT
- 12 -
ANNEX B1 : LESSONS LEARNED
Project Date &
Amount
Intervention
Areas Rating1 Lessons Learned2
Zambia
Agriculture
Sector
Investment
Program
(ASIP)
April 1999 to
June 2008
Amount:
UA 24,2
million
Agricultural
development ***
The PCR of ASIP informed provided several conclusions and lessons:
i) infrastructure development remains very relevant to Zambia’s development;
ii) the role of communities in programme identification, monitoring and implementation should be built in the
programme design to ensure ownership;
iii) Agriculture projects should be fully prepared to detailed design before approval to ensure their readiness for
implementation;
iv) in a programme like ASIP, clear roles, inter-relationship and accountabilities of all institution involved hould be
established;
v) local contractors should be thoroughly scrutinized for their financial and technical capability to ensure their ability
to adequately complete contracted work in a timely manner;
vi) a strong Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) system coupled with quality baseline data is imperative for better
monitoring of programme implementation, better performance evaluation and impact assessment;
vii) the inability to develop and implement a business management plan for various revolving funds established and
Livestock Market Centers which will limit the sustainability of outcomes;
viii) the risk that the level of activities and interaction between extension staff and farmers declines if there is no
increase in public resource flows to the districts;
ix) operating and maintenance cost is required for equipment and civil works established;
x) training in the development and implementation of Business Plans for Revolving Funds at Livestock Market
Livestock
development
***
Infrastructure
development
**
Overall ***
1 **** (75-100% Benchmarks Met); *** (50-75 % Benchmarks Met); ** (25-50% Benchmarks Met); * (0-25% Benchmarks Met) from PCR or other available rating.
2 Conclusions from the Project Completion Report (PCR).
- 13 -
Project Date &
Amount
Intervention
Areas Rating1 Lessons Learned2
Centers and Artificial Insemination Centre is required.
xi) beneficiaries should be encouraged to contribute to the maintenance of civil works facilities through maintenance
committees;
xii) Proper implementation arrangements are important for timely execution of project activities - the implementation
of the project improved only after a PMU was set up, but even then, the Programme Manager did not have adequate
technical support.
Most of the issues raised above were approached during the preparation and appraisal approach and are reflected in
the design of SCRIKA. Additional fine tuning in the design and description of the operation is expected to be
provided through the PPF to be conducted prior to the onset of the intervention.
SADC
REGION:
Strengthening
Institutions for
risk
management
of
Trans
boundary
animal
diseases
(TADs)3
UA 13.71
million
Networking and
Information
Sharing
***
The Multinational SADC “Strengthening Institutions for the Risk Management of Trans-boundary Animal Diseases
(TADs) in the SADC region is an ongoing intervention with the objective of enhancing livestock as a tradable
commodity through assured animal health. The project covers five countries of the SADC region, namely: Angola,
Secretariatawi, Mozambique, Tanzania and Zambia. The project has made so far great contributions in terms of
strengthening the capacity of public institutions in charge of animal health in coping with the management of livestock
trans-boundary diseases in the five participating countries. These contributions were made through large investments in
the development of physical and human capacities in the laboratories, field staff and the surveillance and diagnostics
capacity of the public health services. It also contributed to advancing the knowledge on TADs and their management.
The main lesson learned from the ongoing implementation are:
i) Collaboration among participating countries is key to successful delivery of outputs and outcome and to
amplifying the effects of the project;
ii) care should be taken to ensure that all countries are implementing the project at the a similar speed as countries may
have different capacities for implementation. If one country lags behind it impedes project overall performance;
iii) Implementation Units must be empowered to fully play its role and not be hindered by bureaucratic processes.
Capacity
Building and
Institutional
Strengthening at
the regional and
national levels
in the area of
laboratories,
epidemiological
and
socioeconomic
domains
***
Overall ***
3 Ratings and lessons learned are derived from last supervision and the project is still ongoing until December 2013.
- 14 -
ANNEX B2 : DETAILED PROJECT COSTS
TABLE 1. CHOMA: INTEGRATED COMMUNITY-BASED ADAPATION
DESIGNATION Unit Unit Cost
(ZMW '000)
Totals Including Contingencies (US$ '000)
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total
I. Investment Costs
A. SERVICES
1. CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
a. FARM-LEVEL SYSTEMS SUPPORT
Conservation Agricultural Training lumpsum 1.027,099 3,36 3,50 3,64 3,80 3,95 18,25
Conservation Agricultural Inputs lumpsum 1.027,099 3,36 3,50 3,64 3,80 3,95 18,25
Soil Moinsture & Fertility Management lumpsum 1.027,099 3,36 3,50 3,64 3,80 3,95 18,25
Seeds for Drought Resistant Crops lumpsum 1.027,099 2,80 2,92 3,04 3,17 3,30 15,22
Seeds for Flood Resistant Crops lumpsum 1.027,099 2,80 2,92 3,04 3,17 3,30 15,22
Seedlings for Fruit Orchards lumpsum 1.027,099 2,80 2,92 3,04 3,17 3,30 15,22
Livestock for Diversifatcion Farming lumpsum 1.027,099 4,20 4,37 4,56 4,75 4,94 22,82
Fisheries for Diversifatcion Farming lumpsum 1.027,099 4,20 4,37 4,56 4,75 4,94 22,82
Erosion Control Activities lumpsum 1.027,099 3,36 3,50 3,64 3,80 3,95 18,25
Improved Grazing Activities lumpsum 1.027,099 3,36 3,50 3,64 3,80 3,95 18,25
Value Chain Investments lumpsum 1.027,099 6,72 6,99 7,29 7,60 7,91 36,51
Subtotal
40,34 41,97 43,73 45,57 47,45 219,05
b. MANAGEMENT OF MATCHING GRANT
Funds Manager - Matching Grants
lumpsum/y 3.929,399 12,55 12,55 12,55 12,55 12,55 62,73
Subtotal
52,89 54,51 56,27 58,12 59,99 281,78
B. MISCELLANEOUS
1. MICRO-PROJECTS
a. COMMUNITY-LEVEL INFRASTRUCTURE
Floods Control & Diversion Structures lumpsum 4.108,395 30,86 30,86 30,86 30,86 30,86 154,31
SSecretariatl-Scale Irrigation Schemes lumpsum 4.108,395 30,86 30,86 30,86 30,86 30,86 154,31
Water Reservoirs & SSecretariatl Dams lumpsum 4.108,395 30,86 30,86 30,86 30,86 30,86 154,31
De-silting & Restocking of Ponds & Water Bodies lumpsum 4.108,395 15,43 15,43 15,43 15,43 15,43 77,16
Improved Wells & Boreholes lumpsum 4.108,395 15,43 15,43 15,43 15,43 15,43 77,16
Community Forest Plantations /a lumpsum 4.108,395 15,43 15,43 15,43 15,43 15,43 77,16
Wildlife Estates & Communal Game Ranches lumpsum 4.108,395 15,43 15,43 15,43 15,43 15,43 77,16
Subtotal
154,31 154,31 154,31 154,31 154,31 771,57
2. MATCHING GRANTS
a. CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION INVESTMENTS
Processing Plants for Crops lumpsum 2.532,979 19,03 19,03 19,03 19,03 19,03 95,14
Livestock Production lumpsum 2.532,979 12,68 12,68 12,68 12,68 12,68 63,41
Fisheries lumpsum 2.532,979 12,68 12,68 12,68 12,68 12,68 63,41
Forest Products lumpsum 2.532,979 12,68 12,68 12,68 12,68 12,68 63,41
Outgrower Scheme (Crops & Livestock) lumpsum 2.532,979 12,68 12,68 12,68 12,68 12,68 63,41
Game Ranches lumpsum 2.532,979 12,68 12,68 12,68 12,68 12,68 63,41
Wildlife Estates lumpsum 2.532,979 12,68 12,68 12,68 12,68 12,68 63,41
Subtotal
95,12 95,12 95,12 95,12 95,12 475,60
Subtotal
249,43 249,43 249,43 249,43 249,43 1 247,17
Total
302,32 303,95 305,71 307,55 309,43 1 528,95
\a Forest Plantations & Reforestation
TABLE 2. CHOMA: SUPPORT TO PARTICIPATORY ADAPTATION
DESIGNATION Unit Unit Cost
(ZMW '000)
Totals Including Contingencies (US$ '000)
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total
I. Investment Costs
A. SERVICES
1. CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
a. SUPPORT TO LOCAL COMMUNITIES
Mobilization, Training & Facilitation lumpsum 1.823,796 23,87 24,83 25,88 26,97 28,08 129,63
Risk & Vulnerability Assessment lumpsum 1.823,796 23,87 24,83 25,88 26,97 28,08 129,63
- 15 -
DESIGNATION Unit Unit Cost
(ZMW '000)
Totals Including Contingencies (US$ '000)
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total
Integration of Climate Risk Mgt in Local Planning
lumpsum 1.823,796 23,87 24,83 25,88 26,97 28,08 129,63
Total
71,62 74,50 77,63 80,91 84,23 388,89
TABLE 3. CHOMA: PROJECT COORDINATION
DESIGNATION Unit Unit Cost
(ZMW '000)
Totals Including Contingencies (US$ '000)
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total
I. Investment Costs
A. GOODS
1. VEHICLES
Double-Cabin Vehicle 4x4 for Province unit 270 52,67 - - - - 52,67
Motorcycles (02) unit 40 15,63 - - - - 15,63
Subtotal
68,31 - - - - 68,31
2. EQUIPMENT
Desktop PC at the Choma Province unit 3,45 0,67 - - - - 0,67
Desktop PC at the Choma District unit 3,45 0,67 - - - - 0,67
Multi-Function Printers unit 2 0,78 - - - - 0,78
Subtotal
2,13 - - - - 2,13
Total Investment Costs
70,44 - - - - 70,44
II. Recurrent Costs
A. DAILY SUBSISTENCE ALLOWANCES
Chief Planner at Choma Province pers/day 0,8 3,13 3,27 3,42 3,57 3,73 17,12
District Planner at Choma District pers/day 0,8 3,13 3,27 3,42 3,57 3,73 17,12
Drivers pers/day 0,3 1,17 1,23 1,28 1,34 1,40 6,42
Subtotal
7,44 7,76 8,11 8,49 8,86 40,66
B. OPERATION & MAINTENANCE
1. VEHICLES
Double-Cabine Vehicle at Province km 0,003 12,90 15,97 16,50 17,05 17,61 80,02
Motorcycles (02) 2 km 0,001/km 3,61 5,58 5,77 5,96 6,15 27,07
Subtotal
16,50 21,55 22,27 23,01 23,76 107,09
C. GENERAL OPERATING CHARGES
Office Supplies lumps/y 2,1 0,41 0,43 0,45 0,47 0,48 2,24
Total Recurrent Costs
24,35 29,74 30,83 31,96 33,11 149,99
Total
94,79 29,74 30,83 31,96 33,11 220,42
TABLE 4. KALOMO: INTEGRATED COMMUNITY-BASED ADAPATION
DESIGNATION Unit Unit Cost
(ZMW '000)
Totals Including Contingencies (US$ '000)
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total
I. Investment Costs
A. SERVICES
1. CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
a. FARM-LEVEL SYSTEMS SUPPORT
Conservation Agricultural Training lumpsum 1.027,099 3,36 3,50 3,64 3,80 3,95 18,25
Conservation Agricultural Inputs lumpsum 1.027,099 3,36 3,50 3,64 3,80 3,95 18,25
Soil Moinsture & Fertility Management lumpsum 1.027,099 3,36 3,50 3,64 3,80 3,95 18,25
Seeds for Drought Resistant Crops lumpsum 1.027,099 2,80 2,92 3,04 3,17 3,30 15,22
Seeds for Flood Resistant Crops lumpsum 1.027,099 2,80 2,92 3,04 3,17 3,30 15,22
Seedlings for Fruit Orchards lumpsum 1.027,099 2,80 2,92 3,04 3,17 3,30 15,22
Livestock for Diversifatcion Farming lumpsum 1.027,099 4,20 4,37 4,56 4,75 4,94 22,82
Fisheries for Diversifatcion Farming lumpsum 1.027,099 4,20 4,37 4,56 4,75 4,94 22,82
Erosion Control Activities lumpsum 1.027,099 3,36 3,50 3,64 3,80 3,95 18,25
Improved Grazing Activities lumpsum 1.027,099 3,36 3,50 3,64 3,80 3,95 18,25
Value Chain Investments lumpsum 1.027,099 6,72 6,99 7,29 7,60 7,91 36,51
Subtotal
40,34 41,97 43,73 45,57 47,45 219,05
b. MANAGEMENT OF MATCHING GRANT
- 16 -
DESIGNATION Unit Unit Cost
(ZMW '000)
Totals Including Contingencies (US$ '000)
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total
Funds Manager - Matching Grants lumps/y 3.929,399 12,55 12,55 12,55 12,55 12,55 62,73
Subtotal
52,89 54,51 56,27 58,12 59,99 281,78
B. MISCELLANEOUS
1. MICRO-PROJECTS
a. COMMUNITY-LEVEL INFRASTRUCTURE
Floods Control & Diversion Structures lumpsum 4.108,395 30,86 30,86 30,86 30,86 30,86 154,31
SSecretariatl-Scale Irrigation Schemes lumpsum 4.108,395 30,86 30,86 30,86 30,86 30,86 154,31
Water Reservoirs & SSecretariatl Dams lumpsum 4.108,395 30,86 30,86 30,86 30,86 30,86 154,31
De-silting & Restocking of Ponds & Water Bodies lumpsum 4.108,395 15,43 15,43 15,43 15,43 15,43 77,16
Improved Wells & Boreholes lumpsum 4.108,395 15,43 15,43 15,43 15,43 15,43 77,16
Community Forest Plantations /a lumpsum 4.108,395 15,43 15,43 15,43 15,43 15,43 77,16
Wildlife Estates & Communal Game Ranches lumpsum 4.108,395 15,43 15,43 15,43 15,43 15,43 77,16
Subtotal
154,31 154,31 154,31
154,31 154,31 771,57
2. MATCHING GRANTS
a. CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION INVESTMENTS
Processing Plants for Crops lumpsum 2.532,979 19,03 19,03 19,03 19,03 19,03 95,14
Livestock Production lumpsum 2.532,979 12,68 12,68 12,68 12,68 12,68 63,41
Fisheries lumpsum 2.532,979 12,68 12,68 12,68 12,68 12,68 63,41
Forest Products lumpsum 2.532,979 12,68 12,68 12,68 12,68 12,68 63,41
Outgrower Scheme (Crops & Livestock) lumpsum 2.532,979 12,68 12,68 12,68 12,68 12,68 63,41
Game Ranches lumpsum 2.532,979 12,68 12,68 12,68 12,68 12,68 63,41
Wildlife Estates lumpsum 2.532,979 12,68 12,68 12,68 12,68 12,68 63,41
Subtotal
95,12 95,12 95,12 95,12 95,12 475,60
Subtotal
249,4 249,43 249,43 249,4 249,43 1 247,17
Total
302,3 303,95 305,71 307,6 309,43 1 528,95
\a Forest Plantations & Reforestation
TABLE 5. KALOMO: SUPPORT TO PARTICIPATORY ADAPTATIO
DESIGNATION Unit Unit Cost
(ZMW '000)
Totals Including Contingencies (US$ '000)
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total
I. Investment Costs
A. SERVICES
1. CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
a. SUPPORT TO LOCAL COMMUNITIES
Mobilization, Training & Facilitation lumpsum 1.823,796 23,87 24,83 25,88 26,97 28,08 129,63
Risk & Vulnerability Assessment lumpsum 1.823,796 23,87 24,83 25,88 26,97 28,08 129,63
Integration of Climate Risk Mgt in Local Planning lumpsum 1.823,796 23,87 24,83 25,88 26,97 28,08 129,63
Total
71,62 74,50 77,63 80,91 84,23 388,89
TABLE 6. KALOMO: CLIMATE PROOFING OF ROADS INFRASTRUCTURE
DESIGNATION Unit Unit Cost
(ZMW '000)
Totals Including Contingencies (US$ '000)
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total
I. Investment Costs
A. WORKS
1. FARM TO MARKET ACCESS ROADS
Kalomo to Dundumwezi km 301,868 - 1 730,16 3 545,42 - - 5 275,57
Total
- 1 730,16 3 545,42 - - 5 275,57
- 17 -
TABLE 7. KALOMO: PROJECT COORDINATION
DESIGNATION Unit Unit Cost
(ZMW '000)
Totals Including Contingencies (US$ '000)
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total
I. Investment Costs
A. GOODS
1. VEHICLES
Motorcycles (02) unit 40 15,63 - - - - 15,63
2. EQUIPMENT
Desktop PC at the Kalomo District unit 3,45 0,67 - - - - 0,67
Multi-Function Printers unit 2 0,39 - - - - 0,39
Subtotal
1,06 - - - - 1,06
Total Investment Costs
16,70 - - - - 16,70
II. Recurrent Costs
A. DAILY SUBSISTENCE ALLOWANCES
District Planner at Choma District pers/day 0,8 3,13 3,27 3,42 3,57 3,73 17,12
B. OPERATION & MAINTENANCE
1. VEHICLES
Motorcycles (02) 2 km 0,001/km 3,61 5,58 5,77 5,96 6,15 27,07
C. GENERAL OPERATING CHARGES
Office Supplies lumps/y 2,1 0,41 0,43 0,45 0,47 0,48 2,24 Total Recurrent Costs
7,15 9,28 9,63 10,00 10,37 46,43
Total
23,85 9,28 9,63 10,00 10,37 63,12
TABLE 8. NAMWALA: INTEGRATED COMMUNITY-BASED ADAPATION
DESIGNATION Unit Unit Cost
(ZMW '000)
Totals Including Contingencies (US$ '000)
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total
I. Investment Costs
A. SERVICES
1. CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
a. FARM-LEVEL SYSTEMS SUPPORT
Conservation Agricultural Training lumpsum 1.027,099 3,36 3,50 3,64 3,80 3,95 18,25
Conservation Agricultural Inputs lumpsum 1.027,099 3,36 3,50 3,64 3,80 3,95 18,25
Soil Moinsture & Fertility Management lumpsum 1.027,099 3,36 3,50 3,64 3,80 3,95 18,25
Seeds for Drought Resistant Crops lumpsum 1.027,099 2,80 2,92 3,04 3,17 3,30 15,22
Seeds for Flood Resistant Crops lumpsum 1.027,099 2,80 2,92 3,04 3,17 3,30 15,22
Seedlings for Fruit Orchards lumpsum 1.027,099 2,80 2,92 3,04 3,17 3,30 15,22
Livestock for Diversifatcion Farming lumpsum 1.027,099 4,20 4,37 4,56 4,75 4,94 22,82
Fisheries for Diversifatcion Farming lumpsum 1.027,099 4,20 4,37 4,56 4,75 4,94 22,82
Erosion Control Activities lumpsum 1.027,099 3,36 3,50 3,64 3,80 3,95 18,25
Improved Grazing Activities lumpsum 1.027,099 3,36 3,50 3,64 3,80 3,95 18,25
Value Chain Investments lumpsum 1.027,099 6,72 6,99 7,29 7,60 7,91 36,51
Subtotal
40,34 41,97 43,73 45,57 47,45 219,05
b. MANAGEMENT OF MATCHING GRANT
Funds Manager - Matching Grants lumps/y 3.929,399 12,55 12,55 12,55 12,55 12,55 62,73
Subtotal
52,89 54,51 56,27 58,12 59,99 281,78
B. MISCELLANEOUS
1. MICRO-PROJECTS
a. COMMUNITY-LEVEL INFRASTRUCTURE
Floods Control & Diversion Structures lumpsum 4.108,395 30,86 30,86 30,86 30,86 30,86 154,31
SSecretariatl-Scale Irrigation Schemes lumpsum 4.108,395 30,86 30,86 30,86 30,86 30,86 154,31
Water Reservoirs & SSecretariatl Dams lumpsum 4.108,395 30,86 30,86 30,86 30,86 30,86 154,31
De-silting & Restocking of Ponds & Water Bodies lumpsum 4.108,395 15,43 15,43 15,43 15,43 15,43 77,16
Improved Wells & Boreholes lumpsum 4.108,395 15,43 15,43 15,43 15,43 15,43 77,16
Community Forest Plantations /a lumpsum 4.108,395 15,43 15,43 15,43 15,43 15,43 77,16
Wildlife Estates & Communal Game Ranches lumpsum 4.108,395 15,43 15,43 15,43 15,43 15,43 77,16
Subtotal
154,31 154,31
154,31
154,31
154,31 771,57
2. MATCHING GRANTS
a. CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION INVESTMENTS
Processing Plants for Crops lumpsum 2.532,979 19,03 19,03 19,03 19,03 19,03 95,14
Livestock Production lumpsum 2.532,979 12,68 12,68 12,68 12,68 12,68 63,41
Fisheries lumpsum 2.532,979 12,68 12,68 12,68 12,68 12,68 63,41
Forest Products lumpsum 2.532,979 12,68 12,68 12,68 12,68 12,68 63,41
Outgrower Scheme (Crops & Livestock) lumpsum 2.532,979 12,68 12,68 12,68 12,68 12,68 63,41
- 18 -
DESIGNATION Unit Unit Cost
(ZMW '000) Totals Including Contingencies (US$ '000)
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total
Game Ranches lumpsum 2.532,979 12,68 12,68 12,68 12,68 12,68 63,41
Wildlife Estates lumpsum 2.532,979 12,68 12,68 12,68 12,68 12,68 63,41
Subtotal
95,12 95,12 95,12 95,12 95,12 475,60
Subtotal
249,4 249,43 249,4 249,4 249,4 1 247,17
Total
302,3 303,95 305,7 307,6 309,4 1 528,95
\a Forest Plantations & Reforestation
TABLE 9. NAMWALA: SUPPORT TO PARTICIPATORY ADAPTATION
DESIGNATION Unit Unit Cost
(ZMW '000)
Totals Including Contingencies (US$ '000)
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total
I. Investment Costs
A. SERVICES
1. CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
a. SUPPORT TO LOCAL COMMUNITIES
Mobilization, Training & Facilitation lumpsum 1.823,796 23,87 24,83 25,88 26,97 28,08 129,63
Risk & Vulnerability Assessment lumpsum 1.823,796 23,87 24,83 25,88 26,97 28,08 129,63
Integration of Climate Risk Mgt in Local Planning lumpsum 1.823,796 23,87 24,83 25,88 26,97 28,08 129,63
Total
71,62 74,50 77,63 80,91 84,23 388,89
TABLE 10. NAMWALA: CLIMATE PROOFING OF ROADS INFRASTRUCTURE
DESIGNATION Unit Unit Cost
(ZMW '000) Totals Including Contingencies (US$ '000)
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total
I. Investment Costs
A. WORKS
1. FARM TO MARKET ACCESS ROADS
Namwala to Itezhi-Tezhi D-180 km 301,868 - 2 055,63 - - - 2 055,63
Total
- 2 055,63 - - - 2 055,63
TABLE 11. NAMWALA: PROJECT COORDINATION
DESIGNATION Unit Unit Cost
(ZMW '000) Totals Including Contingencies (US$ '000)
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total
I. Investment Costs
A. GOODS
1. VEHICLES
Double-Cabin Vehicle 4x4 for the District unit 270 52,67 - - - - 52,67
Motorcycles (02) unit 40 15,63 - - - - 15,63
Subtotal
68,31 - - - - 68,31
2. EQUIPMENT
Desktop PC at the Namwala District unit 3,45 0,67 - - - - 0,67
Multi-Function Printers unit 2 0,39 - - - - 0,39
Subtotal
1,06 - - - - 1,06
Total Investment Costs
69,37 - - - - 69,37 II. Recurrent Costs
A. DAILY SUBSISTENCE ALLOWANCES
District Planner at Choma District pers/day 0,8 3,13 3,27 3,42 3,57 3,73 17,12
Driver pers/day 0,3 1,17 1,23 1,28 1,34 1,40 6,42
Subtotal
4,31 4,49 4,70 4,91 5,13 23,54
B. OPERATION & MAINTENANCE
1. VEHICLES
Double-Cabine Vehicle at Province km 0,003 12,90 15,97 16,50 17,05 17,61 80,02
Motorcycles (02) 2 km 0,001/km 3,61 5,58 5,77 5,96 6,15 27,07
Subtotal
16,50 21,55 22,27 23,01 23,76 107,09
C. GENERAL OPERATING CHARGES
Office Supplies lumpsum/y 2,1 0,41 0,43 0,45 0,47 0,48 2,24
Total Recurrent Costs
21,22 26,48 27,41 28,38 29,37 132,87
Total
90,59 26,48 27,41 28,38 29,37 202,24
- 19 -
TABLE 12. MONZE: INTEGRATED COMMUNITY-BASED ADAPATION
DESIGNATION Unit Unit Cost
(ZMW '000)
Totals Including Contingencies (US$ '000)
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total
I. Investment Costs
A. SERVICES
1. CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
a. FARM-LEVEL SYSTEMS SUPPORT
Conservation Agricultural Training lumpsum 1.027,099 3,36 3,50 3,64 3,80 3,95 18,25
Conservation Agricultural Inputs lumpsum 1.027,099 3,36 3,50 3,64 3,80 3,95 18,25
Soil Moinsture & Fertility Management lumpsum 1.027,099 3,36 3,50 3,64 3,80 3,95 18,25
Seeds for Drought Resistant Crops lumpsum 1.027,099 2,80 2,92 3,04 3,17 3,30 15,22
Seeds for Flood Resistant Crops lumpsum 1.027,099 2,80 2,92 3,04 3,17 3,30 15,22
Seedlings for Fruit Orchards lumpsum 1.027,099 2,80 2,92 3,04 3,17 3,30 15,22
Livestock for Diversifatcion Farming lumpsum 1.027,099 4,20 4,37 4,56 4,75 4,94 22,82
Fisheries for Diversifatcion Farming lumpsum 1.027,099 4,20 4,37 4,56 4,75 4,94 22,82
Erosion Control Activities lumpsum 1.027,099 3,36 3,50 3,64 3,80 3,95 18,25
Improved Grazing Activities lumpsum 1.027,099 3,36 3,50 3,64 3,80 3,95 18,25
Value Chain Investments lumpsum 1.027,099 6,72 6,99 7,29 7,60 7,91 36,51
Subtotal
40,34 41,97 43,73 45,57 47,45 219,05
b. MANAGEMENT OF MATCHING GRANT
Funds Manager - Matching Grants lumps/y 3.929,399 12,55 12,55 12,55 12,55 12,55 62,73
Subtotal
52,89 54,51 56,27 58,12 59,99 281,78
B. MISCELLANEOUS
1. MICRO-PROJECTS
a. COMMUNITY-LEVEL INFRASTRUCTURE
Floods Control & Diversion Structures lumpsum 4.108,395 30,86 30,86 30,86 30,86 30,86 154,31
SSecretariatl-Scale Irrigation Schemes lumpsum 4.108,395 30,86 30,86 30,86 30,86 30,86 154,31
Water Reservoirs & SSecretariatl Dams lumpsum 4.108,395 30,86 30,86 30,86 30,86 30,86 154,31
De-silting & Restocking of Ponds & Water Bodies lumpsum 4.108,395 15,43 15,43 15,43 15,43 15,43 77,16
Improved Wells & Boreholes lumpsum 4.108,395 15,43 15,43 15,43 15,43 15,43 77,16
Community Forest Plantations /a lumpsum 4.108,395 15,43 15,43 15,43 15,43 15,43 77,16
Wildlife Estates & Communal Game Ranches lumpsum 4.108,395 15,43 15,43 15,43 15,43 15,43 77,16
Subtotal
154,31 154,31
154,31
154,31 154,31 771,57
2. MATCHING GRANTS
a. CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION INVESTMENTS
Processing Plants for Crops lumpsum 2.532,979 19,03 19,03 19,03 19,03 19,03 95,14
Livestock Production lumpsum 2.532,979 12,68 12,68 12,68 12,68 12,68 63,41
Fisheries lumpsum 2.532,979 12,68 12,68 12,68 12,68 12,68 63,41
Forest Products lumpsum 2.532,979 12,68 12,68 12,68 12,68 12,68 63,41
Outgrower Scheme (Crops & Livestock) lumpsum 2.532,979 12,68 12,68 12,68 12,68 12,68 63,41
Game Ranches lumpsum 2.532,979 12,68 12,68 12,68 12,68 12,68 63,41
Wildlife Estates lumpsum 2.532,979 12,68 12,68 12,68 12,68 12,68 63,41
Subtotal
95,12 95,12 95,12 95,12 95,12 475,60
Subtotal
249,43 249,43 249,4 249,4 249,43 1 247,17
Total
302,32 303,95 305,7 307,6 309,43 1 528,95
\a Forest Plantations & Reforestation
TABLE 13. MONZE: SUPPORT TO PARTICIPATORY ADAPTATION
DESIGNATION Unit Unit Cost
(ZMW '000) Totals Including Contingencies (US$ '000)
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total
I. Investment Costs
A. SERVICES
1. CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
a. SUPPORT TO LOCAL COMMUNITIES
Mobilization, Training & Facilitation lumpsum 1.823,796 23,87 24,83 25,88 26,97 28,08 129,63
Risk & Vulnerability Assessment lumpsum 1.823,796 23,87 24,83 25,88 26,97 28,08 129,63
Integration of CRMin Local Planning lumpsum 1.823,796 23,87 24,83 25,88 26,97 28,08 129,63
Total
71,62 74,50 77,63 80,91 84,23 388,89
- 20 -
TABLE 14. MONZE: PROJECT COORDINATION
DESIGNATION Unit Unit Cost
(ZMW '000)
Totals Including Contingencies (US$ '000)
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total
I. Investment Costs
A. GOODS
1. VEHICLES
Double-Cabin Vehicle 4x4 for the District unit 270 52,67 - - - - 52,67
Motorcycles (02) unit 40 15,63 - - - - 15,63
Subtotal
68,31 - - - - 68,31
2. EQUIPMENT
Desktop PC at Monze District unit 3,45 0,67 - - - - 0,67
Multi-Function Printers unit 2 0,39 - - - - 0,39
Subtotal
1,06 - - - - 1,06
Total Investment Costs
69,37 - - - - 69,37
II. Recurrent Costs
A. DAILY SUBSISTENCE ALLOWANCES
District Planner at Monze District pers/d 0,8 3,13 3,27 3,42 3,57 3,73 17,12
Driver pers/d 0,3 1,17 1,23 1,28 1,34 1,40 6,42
Subtotal
4,31 4,49 4,70 4,91 5,13 23,54
B. OPERATION & MAINTENANCE
1. VEHICLES
Double-Cabine Vehicle at Province km 0,003 12,90 15,97 16,50 17,05 17,61 80,02
Motorcycles (02) 2 km 0,001/km 3,61 5,58 5,77 5,96 6,15 27,07
Subtotal
16,50 21,55 22,27 23,01 23,76 107,09
C. GENERAL OPERATING CHARGES
Office Supplies lumps/y 2,1 0,41 0,43 0,45 0,47 0,48 2,24 Total Recurrent Costs
21,22 26,48 27,41 28,38 29,37 132,87
Total
90,59 26,48 27,41 28,38 29,37 202,24
TABLE 15. MAZABUKA: INTEGRATED COMMUNITY-BASED ADAPATION
DESIGNATION Unit Unit Cost
(ZMW '000)
Totals Including Contingencies (US$ '000)
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total
I. Investment Costs
A. SERVICES
1. CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
a. FARM-LEVEL SYSTEMS SUPPORT
Conservation Agricultural Training lumpsum 1.027,099 3,36 3,50 3,64 3,80 3,95 18,25
Conservation Agricultural Inputs lumpsum 1.027,099 3,36 3,50 3,64 3,80 3,95 18,25
Soil Moinsture & Fertility Management lumpsum 1.027,099 3,36 3,50 3,64 3,80 3,95 18,25
Seeds for Drought Resistant Crops lumpsum 1.027,099 2,80 2,92 3,04 3,17 3,30 15,22
Seeds for Flood Resistant Crops lumpsum 1.027,099 2,80 2,92 3,04 3,17 3,30 15,22
Seedlings for Fruit Orchards lumpsum 1.027,099 2,80 2,92 3,04 3,17 3,30 15,22
Livestock for Diversifatcion Farming lumpsum 1.027,099 4,20 4,37 4,56 4,75 4,94 22,82
Fisheries for Diversifatcion Farming lumpsum 1.027,099 4,20 4,37 4,56 4,75 4,94 22,82
Erosion Control Activities lumpsum 1.027,099 3,36 3,50 3,64 3,80 3,95 18,25
Improved Grazing Activities lumpsum 1.027,099 3,36 3,50 3,64 3,80 3,95 18,25
Value Chain Investments lumpsum 1.027,099 6,72 6,99 7,29 7,60 7,91 36,51
Subtotal
40,34 41,97 43,73 45,57 47,45 219,05
b. MANAGEMENT OF MATCHING GRANT
Funds Manager - Matching Grants
lumpsum/y 3.929,399 12,55 12,55 12,55 12,55 12,55 62,73
Subtotal
52,89 54,51 56,27 58,12 59,99 281,78
B. MISCELLANEOUS
1. MICRO-PROJECTS
a. COMMUNITY-LEVEL INFRASTRUCTURE
Floods Control & Diversion Structures lumpsum 4.108,395 30,86 30,86 30,86 30,86 30,86 154,31
SSecretariatl-Scale Irrigation Schemes lumpsum 4.108,395 30,86 30,86 30,86 30,86 30,86 154,31
Water Reservoirs & SSecretariatl Dams lumpsum 4.108,395 30,86 30,86 30,86 30,86 30,86 154,31
De-silting & Restocking of Ponds & Water Bodies lumpsum 4.108,395 15,43 15,43 15,43 15,43 15,43 77,16
Improved Wells & Boreholes lumpsum 4.108,395 15,43 15,43 15,43 15,43 15,43 77,16
Community Forest Plantations /a lumpsum 4.108,395 15,43 15,43 15,43 15,43 15,43 77,16
Wildlife Estates & Communal Game Ranches lumpsum 4.108,395 15,43 15,43 15,43 15,43 15,43 77,16
Subtotal
154,31 154,31
154,31
154,31
154,31 771,57
2. MATCHING GRANTS
- 21 -
DESIGNATION Unit Unit Cost
(ZMW '000) Totals Including Contingencies (US$ '000)
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total
a. CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION INVESTMENTS
Processing Plants for Crops lumpsum 2.532,979 19,03 19,03 19,03 19,03 19,03 95,14
Livestock Production lumpsum 2.532,979 12,68 12,68 12,68 12,68 12,68 63,41
Fisheries lumpsum 2.532,979 12,68 12,68 12,68 12,68 12,68 63,41
Forest Products lumpsum 2.532,979 12,68 12,68 12,68 12,68 12,68 63,41
Outgrower Scheme (Crops & Livestock) lumpsum 2.532,979 12,68 12,68 12,68 12,68 12,68 63,41
Game Ranches lumpsum 2.532,979 12,68 12,68 12,68 12,68 12,68 63,41
Wildlife Estates lumpsum 2.532,979 12,68 12,68 12,68 12,68 12,68 63,41
Subtotal
95,12 95,12 95,12 95,12 95,12 475,60
Subtotal
249,43 249,43 249,4 249,4 249,4 1 247,17
Total
302,32 303,95 305,7 307,6 309,4 1 528,95
\a Forest Plantations & Reforestation
TABLE 16. MAZABUKA: MAZABUKA: SUPPORT TO PARTICIPATORY ADAPTATION
DESIGNATION Unit Unit Cost
(ZMW '000)
Totals Including Contingencies (US$ '000)
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total
I. Investment Costs
A. SERVICES
1. CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
a. SUPPORT TO LOCAL COMMUNITIES
Mobilization, Training & Facilitation lumpsum 1.823,796 23,87 24,83 25,88 26,97 28,08 129,63
Risk & Vulnerability Assessment lumpsum 1.823,796 23,87 24,83 25,88 26,97 28,08 129,63
Integration of CRM in Local Planning lumpsum 1.823,796 23,87 24,83 25,88 26,97 28,08 129,63
Total
71,62 74,50 77,63 80,91 84,23 388,89
TABLE 17. MAZABUKA: PROJECT COORDINATION
DESIGNATION Unit Unit Cost
(ZMW '000) Totals Including Contingencies (US$ '000)
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total
I. Investment Costs
A. GOODS
1. VEHICLES /a
Motorcycles (02) unit 40 15,63 - - - - 15,63
2. EQUIPMENT
Desktop PC at the Mazabuka District unit 3,45 0,67 - - - - 0,67
Multi-Function Printers unit 2 0,39 - - - - 0,39
Subtotal
1,06 - - - - 1,06
Total Investment Costs
16,70 - - - - 16,70 II. Recurrent Costs
A. DAILY SUBSISTENCE ALLOWANCES
District Planner at Mazabuka District pers/day 0,8 3,13 3,27 3,42 3,57 3,73 17,12
B. OPERATION & MAINTENANCE
1. VEHICLES
Motorcycles (02) 2 km 0,001/km 3,61 5,58 5,77 5,96 6,15 27,07
C. GENERAL OPERATING CHARGES
Office Supplies lumps/y 2,1 0,41 0,43 0,45 0,47 0,48 2,24
Total Recurrent Costs
7,15 9,28 9,63 10,00 10,37 46,43
Total
23,85 9,28 9,63 10,00 10,37 63,12
\a Will share a vehicle with Monze District
TABLE 18. ITEZHI-TEZHI: INTEGRATED COMMUNITY-BASED ADAPATION
DESIGNATION Unit Unit Cost
(ZMW '000) Totals Including Contingencies (US$ '000)
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total
I. Investment Costs
A. SERVICES
1. CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
a. FARM-LEVEL SYSTEMS SUPPORT
Conservation Agricultural Training lumpsum 1.027,099 3,36 3,50 3,64 3,80 3,95 18,25
Conservation Agricultural Inputs lumpsum 1.027,099 3,36 3,50 3,64 3,80 3,95 18,25
Soil Moinsture & Fertility Management lumpsum 1.027,099 3,36 3,50 3,64 3,80 3,95 18,25
- 22 -
DESIGNATION Unit Unit Cost
(ZMW '000) Totals Including Contingencies (US$ '000)
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total
Seeds for Drought Resistant Crops lumpsum 1.027,099 2,80 2,92 3,04 3,17 3,30 15,22
Seeds for Flood Resistant Crops lumpsum 1.027,099 2,80 2,92 3,04 3,17 3,30 15,22
Seedlings for Fruit Orchards lumpsum 1.027,099 2,80 2,92 3,04 3,17 3,30 15,22
Livestock for Diversifatcion Farming lumpsum 1.027,099 4,20 4,37 4,56 4,75 4,94 22,82
Fisheries for Diversifatcion Farming lumpsum 1.027,099 4,20 4,37 4,56 4,75 4,94 22,82
Erosion Control Activities lumpsum 1.027,099 3,36 3,50 3,64 3,80 3,95 18,25
Improved Grazing Activities lumpsum 1.027,099 3,36 3,50 3,64 3,80 3,95 18,25
Value Chain Investments lumpsum 1.027,099 6,72 6,99 7,29 7,60 7,91 36,51
Subtotal
40,34 41,97 43,73 45,57 47,45 219,05
b. MANAGEMENT OF MATCHING GRANT
Funds Manager - Matching Grants
lumpsum/y 3.929,399 12,55 12,55 12,55 12,55 12,55 62,73
Subtotal
52,89 54,51 56,27 58,12 59,99 281,78
B. MISCELLANEOUS
1. MICRO-PROJECTS
a. COMMUNITY-LEVEL INFRASTRUCTURE
Floods Control & Diversion Structures lumpsum 4.108,395 30,86 30,86 30,86 30,86 30,86 154,31
SSecretariatl-Scale Irrigation Schemes lumpsum 4.108,395 30,86 30,86 30,86 30,86 30,86 154,31
Water Reservoirs & SSecretariatl Dams lumpsum 4.108,395 30,86 30,86 30,86 30,86 30,86 154,31
De-silting & Restocking of Ponds & Water Bodies lumpsum 4.108,395 15,43 15,43 15,43 15,43 15,43 77,16
Improved Wells & Boreholes lumpsum 4.108,395 15,43 15,43 15,43 15,43 15,43 77,16
Community Forest Plantations /a lumpsum 4.108,395 15,43 15,43 15,43 15,43 15,43 77,16
Wildlife Estates & Communal Game Ranches lumpsum 4.108,395 15,43 15,43 15,43 15,43 15,43 77,16
Subtotal
154,31 154,31
154,31
154,31
154,31 771,57
2. MATCHING GRANTS
a. CLIMATE CHANGE ADAPTATION INVESTMENTS
Processing Plants for Crops lumpsum 2.532,979 19,03 19,03 19,03 19,03 19,03 95,14
Livestock Production lumpsum 2.532,979 12,68 12,68 12,68 12,68 12,68 63,41
Fisheries lumpsum 2.532,979 12,68 12,68 12,68 12,68 12,68 63,41
Forest Products lumpsum 2.532,979 12,68 12,68 12,68 12,68 12,68 63,41
Outgrower Scheme (Crops & Livestock) lumpsum 2.532,979 12,68 12,68 12,68 12,68 12,68 63,41
Game Ranches lumpsum 2.532,979 12,68 12,68 12,68 12,68 12,68 63,41
Wildlife Estates lumpsum 2.532,979 12,68 12,68 12,68 12,68 12,68 63,41
Subtotal
95,12 95,12 95,12 95,12 95,12 475,60
Subtotal
249,43 249,43 249,4 249,4 249,4 1 247,17
Total
302,32 303,95 305,7 307,6 309,4 1 528,95
\a Forest Plantations & Reforestation
TABLE 19. ITEZHI-TEZHI: SUPPORT TO PARTICIPATORY ADAPTATION
DESIGNATION Unit Unit Cost
(ZMW '000)
Totals Including Contingencies (US$ '000)
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total
I. Investment Costs
A. SERVICES
1. CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
a. SUPPORT TO LOCAL COMMUNITIES
Mobilization, Training & Facilitation lumpsum 1.823,796 23,87 24,83 25,88 26,97 28,08 129,63
Risk & Vulnerability Assessment lumpsum 1.823,796 23,87 24,83 25,88 26,97 28,08 129,63
Integration of CRM in Local Planning lumpsum 1.823,796 23,87 24,83 25,88 26,97 28,08 129,63
Total
71,62 74,50 77,63 80,91 84,23 388,89
TABLE 20. ITEZHI-TEZHI: CLIMATE PROOFING OF ROADS INFRASTRUCTURE
DESIGNATION Unit Unit Cost
(ZMW '000)
Totals Including Contingencies (US$ '000)
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total
I. Investment Costs
A. WORKS
1. FARM TO MARKET ACCESS ROADS
Namwala to Itezhi-Tezhi D-180 km 301,868 - 1 507,46 - - - 1 507,46
Itezhi-Tezhi to Dundumwezi thru Ngoma & Nashila km 301,868 - 3 768,66 4 892,67 - - 8 661,33
Total
- 5 276,12 4 892,67 - - 10 168,80
- 23 -
TABLE 21. ITEZHI-TEZHI: PROJECT COORDINATION
DESIGNATION Unit Unit Cost
(ZMW '000)
Totals Including Contingencies (US$ '000)
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total
I. Investment Costs
A. GOODS
1. VEHICLES
Double-Cabin Vehicle 4x4 for District unit 270 52,67 - - - - 52,67
Motorcycles (02) unit 40 15,63 - - - - 15,63
Subtotal
68,31 - - - - 68,31
2. EQUIPMENT
Desktop PC at the Itezhi-Tezhi District /a unit 3,45 0,67 - - - - 0,67
Multi-Function Printers unit 2 0,78 - - - - 0,78
Subtotal
1,46 - - - - 1,46
Total Investment Costs
69,76 - - - - 69,76
II. Recurrent Costs
A. DAILY SUBSISTENCE ALLOWANCES
District Planner at Itezhi-Tezhi District pers/day 0,8 3,13 3,27 3,42 3,57 3,73 17,12
Driver pers/day 0,3 1,17 1,23 1,28 1,34 1,40 6,42
Subtotal
4,31 4,49 4,70 4,91 5,13 23,54
B. OPERATION & MAINTENANCE
1. VEHICLES
Double-Cabine Vehicle at District km 0,003 12,90 15,97 16,50 17,05 17,61 80,02
Motorcycles (02) 2 km 0,001/km 3,61 5,58 5,77 5,96 6,15 27,07
Subtotal
16,50 21,55 22,27 23,01 23,76 107,09
C. GENERAL OPERATING CHARGES
Office Supplies lumpsum/y 2,1 0,41 0,43 0,45 0,47 0,48 2,24 Total Recurrent Costs
21,22 26,48 27,41 28,38 29,37 132,87
Total
90,98 26,48 27,41 28,38 29,37 202,63
\a A remote project area with poor roads infrastructure
TABLE 22. CHIBOMBO: INTEGRATED COMMUNITY-BASED ADAPATION
DESIGNATION Unit Unit Cost
(ZMW '000)
Totals Including Contingencies (US$ '000)
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total
I. Investment Costs
A. SERVICES
1. CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
a. FARM-LEVEL SYSTEMS SUPPORT
Conservation Agricultural Training lumpsum 1.027,099 3,36 3,50 3,64 3,80 3,95 18,25
Conservation Agricultural Inputs lumpsum 1.027,099 3,36 3,50 3,64 3,80 3,95 18,25
Soil Moinsture & Fertility Management lumpsum 1.027,099 3,36 3,50 3,64 3,80 3,95 18,25
Seeds for Drought Resistant Crops lumpsum 1.027,099 2,80 2,92 3,04 3,17 3,30 15,22
Seeds for Flood Resistant Crops lumpsum 1.027,099 2,80 2,92 3,04 3,17 3,30 15,22
Seedlings for Fruit Orchards lumpsum 1.027,099 2,80 2,92 3,04 3,17 3,30 15,22
Livestock for Diversifatcion Farming lumpsum 1.027,099 4,20 4,37 4,56 4,75 4,94 22,82
Fisheries for Diversifatcion Farming lumpsum 1.027,099 4,20 4,37 4,56 4,75 4,94 22,82
Erosion Control Activities lumpsum 1.027,099 3,36 3,50 3,64 3,80 3,95 18,25
Improved Grazing Activities lumpsum 1.027,099 3,36 3,50 3,64 3,80 3,95 18,25
Value Chain Investments lumpsum 1.027,099 6,72 6,99 7,29 7,60 7,91 36,51
Subtotal
40,34 41,97 43,73 45,57 47,45 219,05
b. MANAGEMENT OF MATCHING GRANT
Funds Manager - Matching Grants lumps/y 3.929,399 12,55 12,55 12,55 12,55 12,55 62,73
Subtotal
52,89 54,51 56,27 58,12 59,99 281,78
B. MISCELLANEOUS
1. MICRO-PROJECTS
a. COMMUNITY-LEVEL INFRASTRUCTURE
Floods Control & Diversion Structures lumpsum 4.108,395 30,86 30,86 30,86 30,86 30,86 154,31
SSecretariatl-Scale Irrigation Schemes lumpsum 4.108,395 30,86 30,86 30,86 30,86 30,86 154,31
Water Reservoirs & SSecretariatl Dams lumpsum 4.108,395 30,86 30,86 30,86 30,86 30,86 154,31
De-silting & Restocking of Ponds & Water Bodies lumpsum 4.108,395 15,43 15,43 15,43 15,43 15,43 77,16
Improved Wells & Boreholes lumpsum 4.108,395 15,43 15,43 15,43 15,43 15,43 77,16
Community Forest Plantations /a lumpsum 4.108,395 15,43 15,43 15,43 15,43 15,43 77,16
Wildlife Estates & Communal Game Ranches lumpsum 4.108,395 15,43 15,43 15,43 15,43 15,43 77,16
- 24 -
DESIGNATION Unit Unit Cost
(ZMW '000) Totals Including Contingencies (US$ '000)
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total
Subtotal
154,31 154,31 154,3 154,3 154,31 771,57
2. MATCHING GRANTS
a. CC ADAPTATION INVESTMENTS
Processing Plants for Crops lumpsum 2.532,979 19,03 19,03 19,03 19,03 19,03 95,14
Livestock Production lumpsum 2.532,979 12,68 12,68 12,68 12,68 12,68 63,41
Fisheries lumpsum 2.532,979 12,68 12,68 12,68 12,68 12,68 63,41
Forest Products lumpsum 2.532,979 12,68 12,68 12,68 12,68 12,68 63,41
Outgrower Scheme (Crops & Livstk) lumpsum 2.532,979 12,68 12,68 12,68 12,68 12,68 63,41
Game Ranches lumpsum 2.532,979 12,68 12,68 12,68 12,68 12,68 63,41
Wildlife Estates lumpsum 2.532,979 12,68 12,68 12,68 12,68 12,68 63,41
Subtotal
95,12 95,12 95,12 95,12 95,12 475,60
Subtotal
249,43 249,43 249,4 249,4 249,43 1 247,17
Total
302,32 303,95 305,7 307,6 309,43 1 528,95
\a Forest Plantations & Reforestation
TABLE 23. CHIBOMBO: SUPPORT TO PARTICIPATORY ADAPTATION
DESIGNATION Unit Unit Cost
(ZMW '000) Totals Including Contingencies (US$ '000)
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total
I. Investment Costs
A. SERVICES
1. CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
a. SUPPORT TO LOCAL COMMUNITIES
Mobilization, Training & Facilitation lumpsum 1.823,796 23,87 24,83 25,88 26,97 28,08 129,63
Risk & Vulnerability Assessment lumpsum 1.823,796 23,87 24,83 25,88 26,97 28,08 129,63
Integration of CRM in Local Planning lumpsum 1.823,796 23,87 24,83 25,88 26,97 28,08 129,63
TOTAL
71,62 74,50 77,63 80,91 84,23 388,89
TABLE 24. CHIBOMBO: PROJECT COORDINATION
DESIGNATION Unit Unit Cost
(ZMW '000)
Totals Including Contingencies (US$ '000)
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total
I. Investment Costs
A. GOODS
1. VEHICLES
Double-Cabin Vehicle 4x4 for Kabwe Province unit 270 52,67 - - - - 52,67
Motorcycles at Chibombo District (02) unit 40 15,63 - - - - 15,63
Subtotal
68,31 - - - - 68,31
2. EQUIPMENT
Desktop PC at Kabwe Province /a unit 3,45 0,67 - - - - 0,67
Desktop PC at the Chibombo District unit 3,45 0,67 - - - - 0,67
Multi-Function Printers unit 2 0,78 - - - - 0,78
Subtotal
2,13 - - - - 2,13
Total Investment Costs
70,44 - - - - 70,44 II. Recurrent Costs
A. DAILY SUBSISTENCE ALLOWANCES
Chief Planner at Kabwe Province pers/day 0,8 3,13 3,27 3,42 3,57 3,73 17,12
District Planner at Chibombo District pers/day 0,8 3,13 3,27 3,42 3,57 3,73 17,12
Driver pers/day 0,3 1,17 1,23 1,28 1,34 1,40 6,42
Subtotal
7,44 7,76 8,11 8,49 8,86 40,66
B. OPERATION & MAINTENANCE
1. VEHICLES
Double-Cabine Vehicle at Kabwe Prov. km 0,003 12,90 15,97 16,50 17,05 17,61 80,02
Motorcycles at Chibombo District (02) 2 km 0,001/km 3,61 5,58 5,77 5,96 6,15 27,07
Subtotal
16,50 21,55 22,27 23,01 23,76 107,09
C. GENERAL OPERATING CHARGES
Office Supplies lumpsum/y 2,1 0,41 0,43 0,45 0,47 0,48 2,24 Total Recurrent Costs
24,35 29,74 30,83 31,96 33,11 149,99
TOTAL
94,79 29,74 30,83 31,96 33,11 220,42
\a A remote project area with poor roads infrastructure
- 25 -
TABLE 25. MUMBWA: INTEGRATED COMMUNITY-BASED ADAPATION
DESIGNATION Unit Unit Cost
(ZMW '000)
Totals Including Contingencies (US$ '000)
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total
I. Investment Costs
A. SERVICES
1. CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
a. FARM-LEVEL SYSTEMS SUPPORT
Conservation Agricultural Training lumpsum 1.027,099 3,36 3,50 3,64 3,80 3,95 18,25
Conservation Agricultural Inputs lumpsum 1.027,099 3,36 3,50 3,64 3,80 3,95 18,25
Soil Moinsture & Fertility Management lumpsum 1.027,099 3,36 3,50 3,64 3,80 3,95 18,25
Seeds for Drought Resistant Crops lumpsum 1.027,099 2,80 2,92 3,04 3,17 3,30 15,22
Seeds for Flood Resistant Crops lumpsum 1.027,099 2,80 2,92 3,04 3,17 3,30 15,22
Seedlings for Fruit Orchards lumpsum 1.027,099 2,80 2,92 3,04 3,17 3,30 15,22
Livestock for Diversifatcion Farming lumpsum 1.027,099 4,20 4,37 4,56 4,75 4,94 22,82
Fisheries for Diversifatcion Farming lumpsum 1.027,099 4,20 4,37 4,56 4,75 4,94 22,82
Erosion Control Activities lumpsum 1.027,099 3,36 3,50 3,64 3,80 3,95 18,25
Improved Grazing Activities lumpsum 1.027,099 3,36 3,50 3,64 3,80 3,95 18,25
Value Chain Investments lumpsum 1.027,099 6,72 6,99 7,29 7,60 7,91 36,51
Subtotal
40,34 41,97 43,73 45,57 47,45 219,05
b. MANAGEMENT OF MATCHING GRANT
Funds Manager - Matching Grants lumps/y 3.929,399 12,55 12,55 12,55 12,55 12,55 62,73
Subtotal
52,89 54,51 56,27 58,12 59,99 281,78
B. MISCELLANEOUS
1. MICRO-PROJECTS
a. COMMUNITY-LEVEL INFRASTRUCTURE
Floods Control & Diversion Structures lumpsum 4.108,395 30,86 30,86 30,86 30,86 30,86 154,31
SSecretariatl-Scale Irrigation Schemes lumpsum 4.108,395 30,86 30,86 30,86 30,86 30,86 154,31
Water Reservoirs & SSecretariatl Dams lumpsum 4.108,395 30,86 30,86 30,86 30,86 30,86 154,31
De-silting & Restocking of Ponds & Water Bodies lumpsum 4.108,395 15,43 15,43 15,43 15,43 15,43 77,16
Improved Wells & Boreholes lumpsum 4.108,395 15,43 15,43 15,43 15,43 15,43 77,16
Community Forest Plantations /a lumpsum 4.108,395 15,43 15,43 15,43 15,43 15,43 77,16
Wildlife Estates & Communal Game Ranches lumpsum 4.108,395 15,43 15,43 15,43 15,43 15,43 77,16
Subtotal
154,31 154,31 154,3 154,3 154,3 771,57
2. MATCHING GRANTS
a. CC ADAPTATION INVESTMENTS
Processing Plants for Crops lumpsum 2.532,979 19,03 19,03 19,03 19,03 19,03 95,14
Livestock Production lumpsum 2.532,979 12,68 12,68 12,68 12,68 12,68 63,41
Fisheries lumpsum 2.532,979 12,68 12,68 12,68 12,68 12,68 63,41
Forest Products lumpsum 2.532,979 12,68 12,68 12,68 12,68 12,68 63,41
Outgrower Scheme (Crops & Livestock) lumpsum 2.532,979 12,68 12,68 12,68 12,68 12,68 63,41
Game Ranches lumpsum 2.532,979 12,68 12,68 12,68 12,68 12,68 63,41
Wildlife Estates lumpsum 2.532,979 12,68 12,68 12,68 12,68 12,68 63,41
Subtotal
95,12 95,12 95,12 95,12 95,12 475,60
Subtotal
249,43 249,43 249,4 249,4 249,4 1 247,17
Total
302,32 303,95 305,7 307,6 309,4 1 528,95
\a Forest Plantations & Reforestation
TABLE 26. MUMBWA: SUPPORT TO PARTICIPATORY ADAPTATION
DESIGNATION Unit Unit Cost
(ZMW '000) Totals Including Contingencies (US$ '000)
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total
I. Investment Costs
A. SERVICES
1. CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
a. SUPPORT TO LOCAL COMMUNITIES
Mobilization, Training & Facilitation lumpsum 1.823,796 23,87 24,83 25,88 26,97 28,08 129,63
Risk & Vulnerability Assessment lumpsum 1.823,796 23,87 24,83 25,88 26,97 28,08 129,63
Integration of CRM in Local Planning lumpsum 1.823,796 23,87 24,83 25,88 26,97 28,08 129,63
Total
71,62 74,50 77,63 80,91 84,23 388,89
- 26 -
TABLE 27. MUMBWA: PROJECT COORDINATION
DESIGNATION Unit Unit Cost
(ZMW '000)
Totals Including Contingencies (US$ '000)
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total
I. Investment Costs
A. GOODS
1. VEHICLES /a
Motorcycles at Mubwa District (02) unit 40 15,63 - - - - 15,63
2. EQUIPMENT
Desktop PC at Mumbwa District unit 3,45 0,67 - - - - 0,67
Multi-Function Printer unit 2 0,39 - - - - 0,39
Subtotal
1,06 - - - - 1,06
Total Investment Costs
16,70 - - - - 16,70
II. Recurrent Costs
A. DAILY SUBSISTENCE ALLOWANCES
District Planner at Mumbwa District pers/day 0,8 3,13 3,27 3,42 3,57 3,73 17,12
B. OPERATION & MAINTENANCE
1. VEHICLES
Motorcycles (02) 2 km 0,001/km 3,61 5,58 5,77 5,96 6,15 27,07
C. GENERAL OPERATING CHARGES
Office Supplies lumpsum/y 2,1 0,41 0,43 0,45 0,47 0,48 2,24
Total Recurrent Costs
7,15 9,28 9,63 10,00 10,37 46,43
Total
23,85 9,28 9,63 10,00 10,37 63,12
TABLE 28. KAFUE: INTEGRATED COMMUNITY-BASED ADAPATION
DESIGNATION Unit Unit Cost
(ZMW '000) Totals Including Contingencies (US$ '000)
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total
I. Investment Costs
A. SERVICES
1. CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
a. FARM-LEVEL SYSTEMS SUPPORT
Conservation Agricultural Training lumpsum 1.027,099 3,36 3,50 3,64 3,80 3,95 18,25
Conservation Agricultural Inputs lumpsum 1.027,099 3,36 3,50 3,64 3,80 3,95 18,25
Soil Moinsture & Fertility Management lumpsum 1.027,099 3,36 3,50 3,64 3,80 3,95 18,25
Seeds for Drought Resistant Crops lumpsum 1.027,099 2,80 2,92 3,04 3,17 3,30 15,22
Seeds for Flood Resistant Crops lumpsum 1.027,099 2,80 2,92 3,04 3,17 3,30 15,22
Seedlings for Fruit Orchards lumpsum 1.027,099 2,80 2,92 3,04 3,17 3,30 15,22
Livestock for Diversifatcion Farming lumpsum 1.027,099 4,20 4,37 4,56 4,75 4,94 22,82
Fisheries for Diversifatcion Farming lumpsum 1.027,099 4,20 4,37 4,56 4,75 4,94 22,82
Erosion Control Activities lumpsum 1.027,099 3,36 3,50 3,64 3,80 3,95 18,25
Improved Grazing Activities lumpsum 1.027,099 3,36 3,50 3,64 3,80 3,95 18,25
Value Chain Investments lumpsum 1.027,099 6,72 6,99 7,29 7,60 7,91 36,51
Subtotal
40,34 41,97 43,73 45,57 47,45 219,05
b. MANAGEMENT OF MATCHING GRANT
Funds Manager - Matching Grants lumpsum/y 3.929,399 12,55 12,55 12,55 12,55 12,55 62,73
Subtotal
52,89 54,51 56,27 58,12 59,99 281,78
B. MISCELLANEOUS
1. MICRO-PROJECTS
a. COMMUNITY-LEVEL INFRASTRUCT
Floods Control & Diversion Structures lumpsum 4.108,395 30,86 30,86 30,86 30,86 30,86 154,31
SSecretariatl-Scale Irrigation Schemes lumpsum 4.108,395 30,86 30,86 30,86 30,86 30,86 154,31
Water Reservoirs & SSecretariatl Dams lumpsum 4.108,395 30,86 30,86 30,86 30,86 30,86 154,31
De-silting & Restocking of Ponds & Water Bodies lumpsum 4.108,395 15,43 15,43 15,43 15,43 15,43 77,16
Improved Wells & Boreholes lumpsum 4.108,395 15,43 15,43 15,43 15,43 15,43 77,16
Community Forest Plantations /a lumpsum 4.108,395 15,43 15,43 15,43 15,43 15,43 77,16
Wildlife Estates & Communal Game Ranches lumpsum 4.108,395 15,43 15,43 15,43 15,43 15,43 77,16
Subtotal
154,31 154,31 154,31 154,3 154,31 771,57
2. MATCHING GRANTS
a. CC ADAPTATION INVESTMENTS
- 27 -
DESIGNATION Unit Unit Cost
(ZMW '000) Totals Including Contingencies (US$ '000)
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total
Processing Plants for Crops lumpsum 2.532,979 19,03 19,03 19,03 19,03 19,03 95,14
Livestock Production lumpsum 2.532,979 12,68 12,68 12,68 12,68 12,68 63,41
Fisheries lumpsum 2.532,979 12,68 12,68 12,68 12,68 12,68 63,41
Forest Products lumpsum 2.532,979 12,68 12,68 12,68 12,68 12,68 63,41
Outgrower Scheme (Crops & Livestock) lumpsum 2.532,979 12,68 12,68 12,68 12,68 12,68 63,41
Game Ranches lumpsum 2.532,979 12,68 12,68 12,68 12,68 12,68 63,41
Wildlife Estates lumpsum 2.532,979 12,68 12,68 12,68 12,68 12,68 63,41
Subtotal
95,12 95,12 95,12 95,12 95,12 475,60
Subtotal
249,43 249,43 249,43 249,4 249,43 1 247,17
Total
302,32 303,95 305,71 307,6 309,43 1 528,95
\a Forest Plantations & Reforestation
TABLE 29. KAFUE: SUPPORT TO PARTICIPATORY ADAPTATION
DESIGNATION Unit Unit Cost
(ZMW '000) Totals Including Contingencies (US$ '000)
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total
I. Investment Costs
A. SERVICES
1. CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
a. SUPPORT TO LOCAL COMMUNITIES
Mobilization, Training & Facilitation lumpsum 1.823,796 23,87 24,83 25,88 26,97 28,08 129,63
Risk & Vulnerability Assessment lumpsum 1.823,796 23,87 24,83 25,88 26,97 28,08 129,63
Integration of CRM in Local Planning lumpsum 1.823,796 23,87 24,83 25,88 26,97 28,08 129,63
Total
71,62 74,50 77,63 80,91 84,23 388,89
TABLE 30. KAFUE: KAFUE: PROJECT COORDINATION
DESIGNATION Unit Unit Cost
(ZMW '000)
Totals Including Contingencies (US$ '000)
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total
I. Investment Costs
A. GOODS
1. VEHICLES
Double-Cab. Vehicle 4x4- Lusaka Prov. unit 270 52,67 - - - - 52,67
Motorcycles (02) unit 40 15,63 - - - - 15,63
Subtotal
68,31 - - - - 68,31
2. EQUIPMENT
Desktop PC at Lusaka Province unit 3,45 0,67 - - - - 0,67
Desktop PC at the Kafue District unit 3,45 0,67 - - - - 0,67
Multi-Function Printers unit 2 0,78 - - - - 0,78
Subtotal
2,13 - - - - 2,13
Total Investment Costs
70,44 - - - - 70,44 II. Recurrent Costs
A. DAILY SUBSISTENCE ALLOWANCES
Chief Planner at Lusaka Province pers/day 0,8 3,13 3,27 3,42 3,57 3,73 17,12
District Planner at Kafue District pers/day 0,8 3,13 3,27 3,42 3,57 3,73 17,12
Drivers pers/day 0,3 1,17 1,23 1,28 1,34 1,40 6,42
Subtotal
7,44 7,76 8,11 8,49 8,86 40,66
B. OPERATION & MAINTENANCE
1. VEHICLES
Double-Cabine Vehicle at Province km 0,003 12,90 15,97 16,50 17,05 17,61 80,02
Motorcycles (02) 2 km 0,001/km 3,61 5,58 5,77 5,96 6,15 27,07
Subtotal
16,50 21,55 22,27 23,01 23,76 107,09
C. GENERAL OPERATING CHARGES
Office Supplies lumps/y 2,1 0,41 0,43 0,45 0,47 0,48 2,24 Total Recurrent Costs
24,35 29,74 30,83 31,96 33,11 149,99
Total
94,79 29,74 30,83 31,96 33,11 220,42
- 28 -
TABLE 31. PROJECT MANGEMENT AND COORDINATION
DESIGNATION Unit Unit Cost
(ZMW '000)
Totals Including Contingencies (US$ '000)
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total
I. Investment Costs
A. WORKS
1. CONSTRUCTION & REHAB.
Additional Office Space m2 4,093 538,41 - - - - 538,41
B. GOODS
1. VEHICULES
Vehicle 4x4 Double-Cabin unit 270 105,35 - - - - 105,35
2. EQUIPMENT
a. IT EQUIPMENT
Desktops unit 3,45 2,70 - - - - 2,70
Laptop Computers unit 4 1,56 - - - - 1,56
Printers unit 3,2 1,25 - - - - 1,25
Deskjet Printers unit 1,6 0,63 - - - - 0,63
Scanners unit 1,8 0,35 0,36 - - - 0,71
UPS unit 1,5 1,47 - - - - 1,47
Projector Multimedia unit 2,5 0,49 - - - - 0,49
Mobile Projection Screen unit 2 0,39 - - - - 0,39
Numeric Camera unit 3 0,59 - - - - 0,59
Subtotal
9,42 0,36 - - - 9,78
b. OFFICE EQUIPMENT
Photocopier unit 25 4,89 - - - - 4,89
Flip-Chart Boards unit 0,95 0,37 - - - - 0,37
Subtotal
5,26 - - - - 5,26
c. FURNITURE
Executive Set unit 11,21 2,19 - - - - 2,19
Profesionnal Sets unit 7,5 5,86 - - - - 5,86
Secretarial Set unit 4 0,78 - - - - 0,78
Meeting Room Set unit 35 6,84 - - - - 6,84
Subtotal
15,67 - - - - 15,67
Subtotal
30,35 0,36 - - - 30,71
Subtotal
135,70 0,36 - - - 136,06
C. SERVICES
1. TRAINING, WORKSHOPS, SEM.
Project Launching sessions/y 150 30,12 - - - - 30,12
Inception at AfDB HQ pers/year 30 12,05 - - - - 12,05
Training in Procrement pers/day 30 12,05 12,50 - - - 24,54
Training in Disbursement sessions/y 30 12,05 12,50 - - - 24,54
Training in Climate Change Adaptation sessions/y 30 12,05 12,50 - - - 24,54
Subtotal
78,32 37,49 - - - 115,81
2. TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE & CONSULT
Setup of the Proecjt's Accounting System Unit 250 48,46 - - - - 48,46
3. CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
a. PROJECT CONTRACTUAL STAFF
Project Manager pers/m 20 45,07 45,07 45,07 45,07 45,07 225,36
M&E Specialist pers/m 8 18,03 18,03 18,03 18,03 18,03 90,15
Procurement Officer pers/m 8 18,03 18,03 18,03 18,03 18,03 90,15
Accountant pers/m 14 31,55 31,55 31,55 31,55 31,55 157,75
CC Adaptation Specialist pers/m 18 40,57 40,57 40,57 40,57 40,57 202,83
Drivers pers/m 5 11,27 11,27 11,27 11,27 11,27 56,34
Secretary pers/m 9 20,28 20,28 20,28 20,28 20,28 101,41
Office Orderly pers/m 3,5 7,89 7,89 7,89 7,89 7,89 39,44
Subtotal
192,69 192,69 192,69 192,7 192,7 963,43
b. STAFF MISSION ALLOWANCES
Project Manager pers/day 0,8 4,51 4,51 4,51 4,51 4,51 22,54
Project Financial Manager pers/day 0,8 3,00 3,00 3,00 3,00 3,00 15,02
M&E Specialist pers/day 0,65 9,16 9,16 9,16 9,16 9,16 45,78
Procurement Officer pers/day 0,65 3,66 3,66 3,66 3,66 3,66 18,31
Accountant pers/day 0,7 1,31 1,31 1,31 1,31 1,31 6,57
CC Adaptation Specialist pers/day 0,65 6,71 6,71 6,71 6,71 6,71 33,57
Drivers pers/day 0,3 4,23 4,23 4,23 4,23 4,23 21,13
Subtotal
32,58 32,58 32,58 32,58 32,58 162,92
c. STEERING COMMITTEE
Meeting of the Steering lumps/y 60 22,54 22,54 22,54 22,54 22,54 112,68
- 29 -
DESIGNATION Unit Unit Cost
(ZMW '000)
Totals Including Contingencies (US$ '000)
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total
Committee
Subtotal
247,81 247,81 247,81 247,81 247,81
1 239,03
4. AUDIT
Annual External Audit Unit 134,1 25,18 25,18 25,18 25,18 25,18 125,92
Subtotal
399,77 310,48 272,99 272,99 272,99
1 529,21
Total Investment Costs
1 073,88 310,84 272,99 272,99 272,99 2
203,68 II. Recurrent Costs
A. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE
1. VEHICLES
4x4 Double-Cabin Pick-ups 2 km 0,003/km 20,63 29,81 30,80 31,82 32,86 145,93
2. EQUIPMENT
IT Equipment lumpsum
- 0,51 0,53 0,55 0,57 2,15
Office Equipment liters
- 0,82 0,85 0,88 0,92 3,48
Subtotal
- 1,33 1,38 1,43 1,49 5,63
Subtotal
20,63 31,14 32,18 33,26 34,35 151,56
B. GENERAL OPERATING CHARGES
Communication & Postage lumps/m 3,2 7,54 7,84 8,17 8,52 8,87 40,94
Office Rental lumps/m 8,5 20,03 20,84 - - - 40,86
Stationaries & Office Supplies lumps/m 2,1 4,95 5,15 5,36 5,59 5,82 26,87
Public Utility Bills lumps/m 1 2,36 2,45 2,55 2,66 2,77 12,80
Security of Office lumps/m 1,85 4,36 4,53 4,73 4,92 5,13 23,67
Subtotal
39,23 40,81 20,82 21,70 22,59 145,14
Total Recurrent Costs
59,87 71,96 52,99 54,95 56,94 296,71
Total
1 133,74 382,79 325,98 327,9 329,9 2
500,39
- 19 -
ANNEX B3 : IMPLEMENTATION ARRANGEMENTS
19. The Project will be implemented over a period of five years (60 months). The
approach of the project is to involve existing groups of farmers and the local communities in
climate risk planning, implementation and evaluation of Project interventions so as to
strengthen the capacity, enhance adoption of new technologies and practices that reduce
climate vulnerability, and increase the sustainability of project outcomes. Farm and
community level activities will be technically guided and backstopped primarily by two
sources: (i) line departments of the government at the District level, and (ii) local NGOs who
will be contracted by the project to facilitate, and mobilize communities as well as supporting
community preparedness and capacity building.
20. At the national level, the interim Inter-Ministerial Climate Change Secretariat under
the Ministry of Finance (MoF) will have the overall lead responsibility for Project execution
(including fiduciary responsibilities), while working closely with all the line Ministries and
Cooperating Partners currently supporting climate change activities in Zambia (as they have
been doing already under the PPCR Phase I). Phase I supported the establishment of the
Secretariat (in the quest to helping overcome some of the current capacity constraints). The
Project will support the establishment of a Project Management Team to be housed within the
Secretariat charged with the responsibility of implementing the AfDB administered project.
At the community level, the Ward/Area Development Committee (ADC) comprising field
staff from the Government and community leaders will work closely with non-governmental
organizations in mobilising the communities, sensitizing and facilitating participatory climate
risk planning. Participatory planning process will be used to identify and implement pilot
concrete adaptation measures focusing on water, crops, fisheries, forestry, wildlife and
livestock management to promote climate resilience. Degraded agro-ecosystems will be
improved through sustainable land management measures. At the District level, the
implementation of the Project will build on existing government structures and will
specifically use a Planning Sub-committee of the District Development Coordination
Committee (DDCC) as the focal point.
21. The National Climate Change Secretariat, under the Ministry of Finance (MoF) will
take overall responsibility for project execution, and oversee and coordinate project
implementation. The Secretariat – already operational - was established by a committee of
Permanent Secretaries in March 2012, and endorsed by directive of the Secretary to the
Cabinet on 16 October 2012. The Secretariat has the mandate to coordinate all climate
change activities across sectors and projects in Zambia. It is also responsible for facilitating
stakeholder consensus and development of Zambia’s Climate Resilient and Low Emissions
Development Program, and facilitate Zambia’s role at international negotiations (namely in
UNFCC, and Green Climate Fund). The Secretariat has been coordinating Phase I of the
PPCR, and is overseen by a Technical Committee with representation from key line
Ministries, civil society and the private sector. Under the long-term arrangements currently
under discussion by the government, the Secretariat will be managed by a multi-stakeholder
Board (the National Climate Change and Development Council). The Secretariat is currently
staffed with eight (8) technical experts, seconded by line Ministries. This core team is
complemented by an attached procurement expert, and contracted staff in the areas of
financial management, communications, monitoring and evaluation, participatory adaptation,
and administration and logistics (procured under Phase 1 of the PPCR). The Project will
- 20 -
support the establishment of a Project Management Team comprising of a Project Manager,
Participatory Adaptation expert to be housed within the Secretariat charged with the
responsibility of implementing the AfDB administered project
22. At the District level, the implementation of the Project will build on existing
government structures and will specifically use a Planning Sub-committee (PSC) of the
District Development Coordination Committee (DDCC) as the focal point. The Planning
Sub-committee oversee the planning, provide specialized technical support, and carry out
fiduciary, safeguards and monitoring oversight of the Community based Participatory
Adaptation Component. The PSC will be headed by the District and report to the Project
Manager at the Secretariat level. The PSC PIU will be supported by the Provincial Planning
Sub-Committee, which will be responsible for selection of the sub-grants and technical
oversight. The Planning Sub-Committee is expected to be reinforced by the inclusion of and
civil society partners. This will ensure that the project is integrated in existing institutional
structures and mandates. The procedures for the Participatory Adaptation component will
follow the Implementation Manual.
23. As part of Component 1.2 Support to integrated community based adaptation, the
Secretariat will contract experienced NGOs and/or other development experts that have on-
going, relevant programs in the target districts. These NGOs, working in close collaboration
with local chiefs will facilitate ward and community-level climate risk planning. They will
also assist target beneficiaries to prepare and submit sub-project proposals in accordance with
the agreed eligibility criteria, and thereafter assist them in implementation. At the ward level,
the project will work directly with existing Ward Development Committees, whilst at the
community level the project will target established Village Area Groups, farmers groups, and
women’s groups.
24. The sub-projects under Component 1.1 will be first screened by the district Planning
Advisory Committee for compliance with the standards, and then reviewed and approved by
the District level Planning Sub-Committee with the presence of Provincial Chief Planner.
The Secretariat would be represented at the first meetings of the District Committee to ensure
compliance with the eligibility criteria. Once approved, lump-sum agreements will be signed
directly with the beneficiaries, and funds will be disbursed directly to their bank accounts in
several tranches, according to the progress of the agreed sub-projects.
25. The road works will be implemented by the Roads Development Authority (RDA).
- 21 -
ANNEX B4 : FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT AND DISBURSEMENT
ARRANGEMENTS
26. Introduction: A financial management assessment of the National Climate Change
Secretariat (NCCS) under the Ministry of Finance (MoF) and responsible for overall project
execution and coordination in accordance with the Bank’s Guidelines for the Financial
Management and Financial Analysis of Projects (2007) and ORPF FMS Tool Kit
(Provisional, June 2010).
27. The objective of the assessment was to determine whether the NCCS, has acceptable
financial management arrangements, which will ensure that: (a) project funds are used only
for the intended purposes, in an efficient and economical way; (b) the project's financial
reports will be prepared in an accurate, reliable, and timely manner; (c) internal controls exist
which allow early detection of errors, unusual practices as a deterrent to fraud and corruption;
(d) project assets are safeguarded; and (e) the project is subject to external audit oversight.
The results of the assessment and the agreed financial management, disbursement and
auditing arrangements for the proposed Strengthening Climate Resilience in the Kafue Basin
Project (SCRIKA) are documented below. The FM assessment was done during the month of
May 2013 as part of the project appraisal. The overall financial management residual risk for
the project is assessed as Moderate.
27. Country Issues: The recently (April 2013) undertook a Fiduciary Risk Assessment of
the Government of the Republic of Zambia’s (GRZ’s) PFM environment as part of the
Proposed Governance Reform Support Program, to assess the level of fiduciary risk
associated with the country’s Public Financial Management (PFM) Systems. The analysis
was based on the four main risk pillars: (1) Budgeting, (2) Audit and reporting, (3)
Procurement and (4) Corruption. The assessment took a look at the recent diagnostic reviews
as well as existing laws in Zambia such as the 2008 and 2012 PEFA (draft) assessments, the
PEMFA Secretariat Report (April 2012), Public Finance Act (PFA) 2004 and Financial
Regulations (PR) - 2006, Public Audit Act (Cap 378), Public Procurement Act (PPA) 2008
and Public Procurement Regulations (PPR) 2011, and Anti-Corruption Bill 2012. Interviews
were also held with key public finance management institutions (Ministry of Finance and
National Planning (MoFNP)), the Accountant General (AG), the Office of the Auditor
General (OAG), Zambian Public Procurement Authority (ZPPA) and the Anti-Corruption
Commission (ACC) and other cooperating partners including the World Bank and the
European Union. The overall country fiduciary risk is deemed substantial, but with a positive
trajectory for change.
28. Reviews of the on-going reforms including the PEMFA report (April 2012) as well as
draft PEFA (2012) report have all revealed progress has been made in a number of areas,
including improvements in legal and regulatory framework for PFM, development and
operationalization of the Debt Management Policy and Strategy (2009), enactment of the
Zambia Public Procurement Act (ZPPA) 2008 replacing the Zambia National Tender Board
Act, the piloting of Integrated Financial Management Information System (IFMIS) in
MoFNP and roll out to 28 more sites. Both Internal and External as well as parliamentary
scrutiny have seen some improvement resulting in increased audit coverage (both internal and
external).
- 22 -
29. In spite of this progress however, major areas of weaknesses have still been identified
that needed to be addressed particularly, in accounting and reporting, internal audit,
procurement, external audit and scrutiny, which GRZ needs to address to further improve
Zambia’s PFM environment. The GRZ has prepared a new PFM Reform Strategy (2011-
2015) which sets out a framework for continuing PFM reforms to help address the
weaknesses identified.
30. Bank fully subscribes to the Paris Declaration (2005) and Accra Agenda for Action
(2008) regarding the use of country systems to the maximum extent possible.
Notwithstanding the weaknesses identified, the Bank will use various aspects of the Country
financial management systems for managing the project. The following aspects of the PFM
system or part thereof will be used: Budgeting – reflecting the project in the National Budget;
Accounting and Financial Reporting - accounting for and reflecting project transactions
within the existing Government’s IFMIS; Treasury Management/Funds Flow – disbursing
project resources through using the GRZ’s banking arrangements and treasury procedures;
Internal Controls and Internal Audit - using the existing national rules and financial control
procedures when implementing the project; and External Audit oversight - using the
Country’s supreme audit institution, the OAG to audit or guide the project financial
statements auditing process as per their mandate.
31. Consequently, a number of risk mitigation measures have been considered which will be
recommended for implementation as part of the financial management improvement plan.
These measures will include: (i) A tailor-made financial management procedures manual that
will provide guidance to staff on all aspects including expenditures that are ineligible under
the project; (ii) Using the MoF Internal Audit to undertake pre-audit of project transactions;
and (iii) Procurement of an Off-the-Shelf accounting software (currently underway) to record
and process transactions and interface it with IFMIS to facilitate timely project financial
reporting given the operational challenges with IFMIS (iv) Assigning a dedicated accounting
staff with adequate qualifications and experience, reporting to the Financial Management
Specialist NCCS, with overall responsibility for the accounting functions of the project; and
(v) Enforcing a system of submitting interim quarterly progress report (IQPR) not later than
30 days after end of each quarter, in addition to annual audited financial statements as per the
requirements of the financing agreement.
32. The financial management and disbursement arrangements for proposed SCRIKA project
satisfy the Bank’s minimum requirements when the above measures are fully implemented.
33. Risk Assessment and Mitigation: The FM risk is assessed in order to ensure that
appropriate risk mitigating measures are incorporated into design of the operation. The Table
XX summarizes the risk identified, the risk rating, and mitigation measures if any.
Table XX: Detailed FM Risk Assessment
Risk Type
Rating
Risk
Risk Mitigation Measures Incorporated
into the Project Design
Risk after
Mitigation
Condition
ality(Yes/
No)
Inherent Risk
Country Level
Weak accountability, lack of
follow up and
implementation of audit
S There is on-going PFM reform
supported by cooperating partners.
IFMIS has been rolled out to most
government ministries (including
S No
- 23 -
Risk Type
Rating
Risk
Risk Mitigation Measures Incorporated
into the Project Design
Risk after
Mitigation
Condition
ality(Yes/
No)
findings, poor enforcement
and compliance with existing
regulations and procedures
etc.
Reporting challenges with
IFMIS following the rebasing
of the Kwacha could affect
timely submission of required
financial reports to the Bank.
SECRETARIAT), and when fully
operational will improve the
accountability and control environment
in government
On-going efforts by Government to
reconfigure IFMIS following rebasing
of the Kwacha to enhance reporting
capabilities within MPSAs.
Entity Level
Possibility of co-mingling
project funds with other GRZ
funds within the MoF
Inadequate FM staffing
within MoF to carry out FM
function under the project
S Separate SA will be opened for the
project and use of project funds will be
closely monitored by the Bank through
quarterly Interim Financial Progress
Report and FM supervisions and
reviews.
The NCCS has recruited a qualified
Financial Management Specialist
specifically for the project and the
process to recruit two more Project
Accountants are on-going.
M No
Project Level Inadequate staffing at NCCS
to handle project transactions.
Weak FM capacity at the
decentralized levels.
S
The project will have a dedicated
Accounts Officer with the requisite
qualification and experience recruited
through competitive process.
The Provincial and District accounts
officers will benefit from the support
and guidance of the accounting staff at
the NCCS due to the proximity of the
beneficiary province and districts to
Lusaka.
Periodic training of dedicated FM staffs
will be undertaken during project
launching, through Fiduciary Clinics
and Supervision missions.
M
Yes
Overall Inherent Risk S S
Control Risk
Budgeting
Weak budget preparation
might result in inadequate
resources for project.
M Budget will be prepared based on
approved Annual Work Plans and by
the Steering Committee and the Bank.
The NCCS which will be responsible
for overall financial management has
prior experience in Budgeting from on-
going Phase I of the project being
financed by the World Bank.
The Financial budgets will be linked to
physical outputs through an operating
plan. The IQPRs will be used to
monitor variance analysis with budget
in accordance with funding
requirements, and all variations in
budget will require prior approval by
the Bank.
L No
Accounting
Inadequate staffing within S The NCCS has recruited a qualified
FMS and there is on-going competitive M No
- 24 -
Risk Type
Rating
Risk
Risk Mitigation Measures Incorporated
into the Project Design
Risk after
Mitigation
Condition
ality(Yes/
No)
NCCS to handle project
transactions.
The use of Excel in recording
and process transaction,
coupled with reporting
problems associated with
smooth functioning of IFMIS
could affect timely project
transaction processing.
Untimely accountability of
Funds transferred to fund
Provincial/District Level
project activities could delay
timely reporting.
process to recruit two additional project
Accountants.
Provincial and district accountants will
provide the necessary back-stopping at
the decentralized levels, where
necessary.
An accounting software will be
procured (currently on-going) to help
process project transaction to ensure
timely preparation of financial
statements in readiness for audit; and to
also interface to IFMIS for central
government’s own accounts.
Subsequent request for advances to the
decentralized levels will only be
approved and made upon full
accounting for previous advances.
Internal Control
Weak control environment as
a result of weak enforcement
of existing financial
regulations and ineffective
internal audit function.
H The Project Implementation Manual to
be developed will provide guidance to
project staff.
The project would be covered by the
work program developed by the MoF
Internal Audit Unit; and there are plans
to attach an Internal Auditor to NCCS
to facilitate pre-audit of transactions.
Bank’s FM Supervision and SOE
reviews would also highlight
weaknesses and make appropriate
recommendations for addressing them.
S
Funds Flow
Delays in the preparation of
payment request to the Bank
could affect timely project
implementation.
Activities at decentralised
levels could be delayed due
to delay in funds flowing
from NCCS.
Delays in counterpart
contribution could affect
project implementation.
S The Bank will provide disbursement
training and guidance to project team in
completing withdrawal applications;
and most of the contracts would be
made through direct payment method.
Personnel within NCCS has are
familiar with replenishment and
payment request under the on-going
Phase I funded by World Bank.
Local Operating Account will be
opened at Commercial in Lusaka with
network Branches in all project-
affected Province and Districts.
Proof of full deposit of beneficiaries’
cash counterpart contributions into the
Group Bank accounts in a commercial
bank will be a pre-requisite for
approving all matching grant sub-
projects.
The bulk of GRZ counterpart
contribution will be in-kind in a form
of office space, counterpart staff
salaries, office supplies etc.
M No
Reporting and Monitoring
Poor quality and delays in
submitting IQPRs and other
reports due to non-existing of
robust accounting system
S Format for IQPR will be agreed with
NCCS during negotiation to ensure
timely submissions to the Bank and
other stakeholders.
The NCCS is currently implementing
M No
- 25 -
Risk Type
Rating
Risk
Risk Mitigation Measures Incorporated
into the Project Design
Risk after
Mitigation
Condition
ality(Yes/
No)
coupled with challenges
associated with IFMIS
operation.
Phase I of the project and the project
will benefit from experience acquired.
Procurement of accounting software is
underway to enhance transaction
processing and progress reporting.
Refusal to replenish future advance
request will also motivate timely
reports submission.
External Audit and Public
Oversight
Delays in auditor recruitment
could affect submission of
annual audit reports.
S The Auditor General will audit the
project and where necessary, appoint a
private external auditor based on
acceptable terms of reference
acceptable to the Bank. NCCS will
ensure that OAG include the project in
their annual audit program.
M No
Overall Control Risk S M
Overall Project Risk Rating S M
H – High S - Substantial M – Moderate L – Low
34. Strengths: The main strengths includes, building on the existing financial
management systems within the NCCS being used in implementing Phase I of the project
being funded by the World Bank, the recruitment of a Financial Management Specialist
(FMS) with prior experience in implementing donor-funded projects to provide oversight, the
use of existing financial management regulations and procedures within the Provincial and
District Councils, and the commitment so far demonstrated by the OAG in undertaking
timely auditing of all on-going project.
35. Weaknesses: The weaknesses identified are: (i) inadequate qualified accounting staff
to take on the additional volume of work the proposed projects will bring, (ii) non-existence
of accounting software coupled with non-fully functional IFMIS, even though the system has
been rolled out to the NCCS; and (iii) delays in getting clearance for payment processing
procedures within the MoF.
36. FM Action Plan: To further strengthen the FM systems within the
PCT/SECRETARIAT and mitigate the identified risks, the following actions were discussed
and agreed with SECRETARIAT to be undertaken.
# Required Actions By Whom By When Comment
1 Submit a financial management
procedures manual as part of the
Project Implementation Manual
(PIM)
FMS - NCCS Effectiveness
The adoption of the PIM is an
effectiveness condition
2 Recruit a dedicated accountant for
the project whose qualification and
experienced is acceptable to the
Bank.
Project
Coordinator/F
MS - NCCS
Effectiveness FMS should prepare the ToR and
submit for Bank review and
clearance as soon as possible.
3 Procurement of accounting
Software to help process project
transactions to facilitate financial
reporting.
FMS - NCCS Effectiveness Procurement process on-going;
and being funded under the on-
going Phase I.
- 26 -
# Required Actions By Whom By When Comment
4 Provide training in the Bank’s
financial management and
disbursement procedures to the
dedicated project accountant and
NCCS accounting staff.
Financial
Management
Specialist,
AfDB
Within 3 months
after
effectiveness.
The first training will be done as
part of project launching, and
further on-the-job coaching will
be provided during Bank FM
Supervisions.
5 Facilitate the attachment of an
Internal Auditor to facilitate
transaction processing and enhance
control environment at NCCS
Project
Coordinator/F
MS - NCCS
Effectiveness Process to get Internal Audit
personnel to be attached to NCCS
is on-going.
6 Ensure that project is covered by
the OAG annual audit work
program; or Private external auditor
recruited with OAG’s involvement
using the Bank’s audit terms of
reference (TOR) where necessary.
NCCS/ OAG Within 6 months
after
project
effectiveness
The OAG is the currently the
external auditor for the on-going
Phase I.
- 27 -
37. Implementing Entity: The project’s financial management will be managed by NCCS
using the existing set-up under Phase I. The NCCS is currently headed by a Project
Coordinator. There is a Financial Management Specialist who was competitively recruited as
the head of the accounting department. Plans are underway to recruit two additional
accountants (1 each for the AfDB and World Bank components respectively). An assessment
of NCCS’s financial management capacity for the implementation of the project indicates
that they satisfy Bank minimum requirements to handle and coordinate the financial
management aspect under the project, with the full implementation of the FM recommended
actions above.
38. Planning and Budgeting: The budgeting system within NCCS is quite comprehensive
and in line with GRZ’s budgeting procedures. Consequently, the operation will follow the
existing principles for budgeting as issued by Ministry of Finance. The NCCS will prepare an
annual work plan and budget for implementing project activities taking into account the
specific project components of this project, and link it to the IFMIS Chart of Accounts with
the project separately identified for financial reporting purposes. These plans and budgets
will be submitted to the Project Steering Committee for approval and thereafter to the Bank.
39. Accounting Policies, Procedures and Information Systems: All project transactions will
be processed using the accounting software (currently being procured); and interface it into
the government’s integrated IFMIS system for government accounting and reporting
purposes. The IFMIS is currently being upgraded following the re-basing of the Kwacha, as
well as addressing some identified system reporting deficiencies, and expected to be fully
operational before project effectiveness. All accounting and supporting documentation will
be retained within the NCCS for auditing purposes. The format for IQPR will be agreed
during negotiations and copies made available to the project team during project launching to
enable them configure the reporting systems within the accounting software.
40. Internal Control and Audit. The project would be covered by the existing internal control
rules and regulations under the existing Finance Act (2004) and Financial Regulations
(2006). The Project Implementation Manual which will include accounting and
administrative procedural manual to be produced by the NCCS and approved by the Bank
would guide day to day implementation of the project with clearly defined roles and
responsibilities allowing for segregation of duties. The procedures manual as well as detailed
project costing table would also highlight expenditures eligible for financing under the
project. Plans are also underway to attach an Internal Auditor to the NCCS to help facilitate
transaction processing and further enhance the project control environment.
- 28 -
41. Funds Flow and Disbursements Arrangements: The project would make use of the
Bank’s various disbursement methods including (i) Direct Payment, (ii) Special Account
(SA) and (iii) Reimbursement methods in accordance with Bank rules and procedures as laid
out in the Disbursement Handbook (that can be accessed from the Bank’s website) as
applicable. Two separate Special Accounts in foreign currency (one each for the Loan and
Grant respectively) will be opened at the Bank of Zambia (BoZ). The MoF on behalf of the
project will transfer funds from the respective SA through the Treasury Control 99 to the
respective project Kwacha sub-accounts held at BoZ and managed by the Secretariat. To
facilitate payment of eligible operating costs two separate Mirror Accounts(one each for the
Loan and Grant) with zero balance linked to the sub-accounts at BoZ, will be opened at local
Commercial Banks in Lusaka with wider network branches especially in the project-affected
districts and acceptable to the Bank. All transfers to be made into the respective sub-accounts
(including payments to matching grant beneficiaries Group accounts) would be based on
quarterly approved eligible operational expenditure cash flow projections prepared from the
project’s approved annual work programme and budget. Consequently, the FMS will ensure
that no excessive or idle funds remain in the mirror accounts at the commercial banks; but
will effectively manage the cash flow cycle to ensure availability of funds at all times to
facilitate project implementation. Releases of funds to finance activities under the sub-
projects and the Matching Grants, will be based on the requirements in respective sub-
projects financing agreement to be signed with grant beneficiaries based on the eligibility
criteria outlined in the Project Implementation Manual (PIM). Preparation of documentation
for all direct payments, special accounts replenishments as well as justification of advances
into the special accounts would be under the overall responsibility of the FMS who would be
assisted by the dedicated Project Accountant. The project use the direct payment method for
all contracts and payments that meet the minimum thresholds as specified in the project
appraisal report. The GRZ through the MoF will be required to submit to the Bank, details of
all Bank Accounts as well as specimen signatures of authorized signatories for signing
withdrawal applications and direct payments. The fund flow arrangement is depicted in the
diagram below.
45. Counterpart contribution: In addition to the in-kind counterpart contribution (office
space, utilities, counterpart staff time etc.) to be provided by GRZ under the project, there is
an agreement for beneficiaries to make cash contributions under the Matching Grant
component under the Integrated Community-Based Adaptation sub-component. Proof of full
deposit of beneficiaries’ cash counterpart contributions into the beneficiary Group Bank accounts in a
commercial bank, will be a pre-requisite for disbursement of all matching grants.
- 29 -
Funds Flow Diagram (SCF Resources)
SCF
Loan
Special Foreign Currency
(USD$) Holding Account
(SFCHA) in BoZ for SCF
Loan
Mirror Loan Account for
NSSC in Kwacha at
Commercial Bank in
Lusaka
Special Foreign
Currency (USD$)
Holding Account
(Kwacha) in BoZ for
SCF Grant
Matching Grant sub-
component: Beneficiaries Group
Accounts in local
Commercial Banks
Civil Work, Contractors,
Suppliers, Consultants, etc.
Mirror Grant Account
for NSSC in Kwacha at
Commercial Bank in
Lusaka
Eligible project eligible
expenses at
NCCS/Provinces/Districts;
Civil Work, Contractors,
Suppliers, Consultants.
SCF
Grant Loan
Transfers
Treasury Control 99 at BoZ
in Zambian Kwacha
Transfers Treasury Control 99 at BoZ
in Zambian Kwacha
Transfers Sub-account at BoZ
for NCCS in Zambian
Kwacha
Transfers Sub-account at BoZ
for NCCS in Zambian
Kwacha
- 30 -
46. Financial Reporting: The overall responsibility for financial reporting will rest with
the FMS, as the head of NCCS’s finance department, and supported by two dedicated
accounting staff with adequate qualifications and experience accepted to the Bank. Provincial
and District Accountants will provide the necessary backstopping at the local levels (where
necessary). All project transactions will be accounted for by NCCS and reported on using a
stand-alone accounting software to be procured (procurement process on-going) and installed
by the project, to ensure timely submission of financial reports. The accounting software to
be installed will be interfaced into the IFMIS (where possible) to facilitate capturing the
project activities in GRZ’s annual national financial accounts. In addition, the project will be
required to prepare and submit to the Bank, Interim Quarterly Progress report (IQPR) not
later than 30 days after the end of each calendar quarter. Format for IQPR would be provided
by the Bank and agreed upon during negotiations. Where funds are transferred to the
provincial levels to finance project local activities, the provincial and district accountants
would coordinate the accounting functions at the decentralized levels in line with government
existing systems and submit copies of all appropriate documents and reports to the NCCS for
reporting purposes. To reduce the burden of financial reporting on the NCCS, the Bank’s
reporting requirements will be aligned to that of other co-financiers of the project.
47. External Audit: In accordance with the Bank’s requirements, a separate annual audit
report will be prepared for the project with the involvement of the OAG, Zambia as per their
mandate. The annual audited financial statements including the auditor’s opinion and
management letter will be submitted to the Bank not later than six months after the end of
each fiscal year. The audit of the project can be subcontracted as may be necessary to a firm
of private auditors to be procured through short-lists (with the involvement of OAG) using
the Bank’s rules and procedures for procurement and the cost of audit will be financed from
the loan if carried out by a private firm. In addition to the financial audit, two technical and
performance audits (including procurement reviews) will be undertaken during project mid-
term and at completion respectively, to be based on technical audit terms of reference agreed
between the Bank and GRZ. Emphasis will be placed on assessment of proper use and
accountability of funds, procurement, physical implementation of the civil works, and social
and environmental monitoring. The technical audit would be conducted by an independent
firm having expertise in similar work. NCCS should therefore inform the OAG of project
effectiveness to enable them plan for the audit accordingly.
48. FM Supervision: The project would be implemented in a “Moderate” risk environment.
Despite the “Moderate” risk rating, there would be two supervision missions in the first year
to ensure adequate start-up of project activities. Financial Management (FM) training as well
as the required reporting templates would be provided to the FM staff as part of capacity
strengthening by the Bank FM team. Other supervision activities would be desk reviews of
the IQPRs, annual audit reports, and management letters for follow-up actions. The outcome
of these reviews would inform the intensity of subsequent FM supervisions.
- 31 -
ANNEX B5 : PROCUREMENT – GOODS, WORKS AND
CONSULTANCY SERVICES
B.5.1 National Procedures and Regulations - Use of Country Procurement Systems
49. The Bank has undertaken an assessment of the country’s National Public Procurement
Procedures in a report dated June 2011 and the identified areas of weakness are being
addressed by the government. The country’s NCB procedures cannot be used until the
concerns identified in the report are addressed to the Bank’s satisfaction. The Bank has been
engaging in dialogue with the Government on the identified deviations as outlined in the
Global Action Plan (GAP) (included in this Annex), which affect the basic principles
underlying the Bank’s fiduciary obligations. The deviations relating to the Bank’s “fiduciary
obligations” have constituted the basis for the dialogue between the CPs and the Government.
The CPs have engaged the relevant government bodies and pointed out provisions of the
national procurement law which the country needs to amend in order to meet the required
standards under international procurement practices. The ZPPA is currently developing a
Strategic Plan which will among other things focus on reforms that will address these issues.
B.5.2 Procurement Arrangements
50. All procurement of goods, works and acquisition of consulting services financed by
the Bank will be in accordance with the Bank’s Rules and Procedures: “Rules and Procedures
for Procurement of Goods and Works”, dated May 2008, revised July 2012; and “Rules and
Procedures for the Use of Consultants”, dated May 2008, revised July 2012, using the
relevant Bank Standard Bidding Documents, and the provisions stipulated in the Financing
Agreement.
51. The Multi-sectorial National Climate Change Secretariat (Executing Agency) under
the Ministry of Finance will be the Executing Agency. This unit will carry out procurements
in collaboration with Procurement and Supplies Unit while the Road Development Agency
(RDA) will provide procurement support for the civil works involving roads rehabilitation.
The responsibility for the management of the procurement processes and accountability for
implementation of all components will rest with the secretariat under the Ministry of Finance.
The Secretariat will ensure oversight of all the procurement carried out during project
implementation including the demand driven interventions at community level. The activities
under the Community Demand Driven Participatory Adaptation component which will
finance community led infrastructure sub-projects and farm level support systems will be
procured at the community level using modalities for procurement under Community–Driven
Development procedures. The details for procurement processes under this component will
be articulated in the Participatory Adaptation Implementation Manual, which is being
developed. This manual will also define the roles and responsibilities for various parties,
internal and external controls, and approval and accountability systems. The manual will be
developed based on the Bank Guidelines for Procurement Under Community-Based
Investment Projects
- 32 -
52. The Provincial Planning Unit under the Provincial Permanent Secretary will carry out
a monitoring and coordination function of all activities in the province while the District
Planning Office (planning sub-committee of the DDCC) under the District Council will be
the focal point for implementation at district level. Appropriate training in sub-project
management and procurement under community driven development will be undertaken for
district staff and beneficiary community groups to ensure efficiency, transparency and
accountability.
53. The various items under different expenditure categories and related procurement
arrangements are summarized in Table B.5.1a and B.5.1b. Each contract to be financed by
the Bank, the different procurement methods, estimated costs, prior-review requirements, and
time frame are agreed between the Borrower and the Bank project team and are provided in
the Procurement Plan (see Table B.5.2).
Table B.5.1a: Procurement Arrangements
No Project Categories (UA Million)
ICB
NCB Shortlist * Other**
Non-Bank
Funded Total
1 Civil Works
1.1 Office Rehabilitation for
Secretariat
0.36
0.36
1.2 Roads Rehabilitation 11.8
(11.8)
11.8
1.3 Road Maintenance costs 8.32 8.32
Sub-total (11.8)
8.68 (11.8)
20.46
2 Goods
2.1 Motor Vehicles
0.28
(0.28)
0.28
(0.28
2.2 Motor Cycles
0.09
(0.09)
0.09
(0.09)
2.3 Office Equipment
0.02 (0.02)
0.02
(0.02)
2.4 Furniture
0.01
(0.01)
0.01
(0.01)
Sub-total (0.28)
(0.12)
(0.40)
3 Services
3.1 Consultancy Services :
Civil Works Supervision 0.534 0.534
Fund Manager –Marching
Grants
0.38
(0.38)
0.38
(0.38)
Farm Level Support System
1.32
(1.32)
1.32
(1.32)
Support to Local Communities 2.34
(2.34)
2.34
(2.34)
Consultancy -Support to
Secretariat
0.71
(0.71)
0.71
(0.71)
Technical Assistance
0.03
(0.03)
0.03 (0.03)
Financial Audit
0.08
(0.08)
0.08
(0.08)
3.2 Training / workshops
0.08
(0.08)
0.08
(0.08)
Sub-total
(0.38) (4.56) 0.534 5.47
(4.94)
4 Miscellaneous
- 33 -
No Project Categories (UA Million)
ICB
NCB Shortlist * Other**
Non-Bank
Funded Total
4.1
Micro – Projects for
Community –Level Infrastructure
4.63
(4.63)
4.63
(4.63)
4.2 Marching Grants
2.86
(2.86)
2.86
(2.86)
Sub-total (7.49) (7.49)
5 Operating Costs
0.86
(0.86)
0.86
(0.86)
5.1 Civil Service Staff Costs
Attached to the Project
0.12 0.12
Sub-Total
(0.86) 0.98
(0.86)
Total (11.68) (0.28)
(2.72) (10.69) 9.33 34.68
(25.35)
* Applies to shortlist procedures in compliance with clause 2.6 of the Bank Rules (QCBS).
** Applies to the use of “other” procurement methods for Goods, Works and Services as outlined in table B 5.1b below.
Table B.5.1b: Other Methods of Procurement (UA million)
Item Amount
(In UA ‘000) Method
Goods and Works
Office Rehabilitation for Secretariat 0.36
Shopping
Motor Cycles 0.09
(0.09) Shopping
Office Equipment 0.02
(0.02) Shopping
Furniture 0.01
(0.01) Shopping
Services
Farm Level Support System 1.32
(1.32)
Single Sourcing – Bank Approved
Public Institution / Agency
Consultancy- Support to Secretariat 0.71
(0.71) Individual Consultants
Technical Assistance 0.03
(0.03) Individual Consultant
Financial Audit 0.08
(0.08) Least Cost Selection (LCS)
Training and Workshops 0.08
(0.08)
Based on Bank Approved Training
Programme, Work Plan and Budget
Miscellaneous
Micro–Projects for Community Level Infrastructure 4.63
(4.63)
Community Participation in
Procurement
Matching Grants 2.86
(2.86)
Community Participation in
Procurement
Operating Costs 0.86
(0.86)
Internal Operational Systems of
Executing Agency
Attached Civil Service Staff costs 0.12 Internal Operational Systems of
Executing Agency
- 34 -
54. Civil Works: Contracts of works valued equal to or greater than UA 3 million will be
carried out under International Competitive Bidding (ICB) procedures using the standard
Bidding Documents. These works will comprise centrally procured road rehabilitation works
which will be packaged in two (2) lots and these will be rural roads linking farmers to
markets as well as to the Kafue National Park covering a total of 156 km whose contracts are
estimated at an aggregate value of UA 11.8 million (comprising (i) Kalomo to Dundumwezi
(75km), estimated at UA 5.5 million (ii) Ngoma to Itezhi-tezhi to Namwala (81 km),
estimated at UA 6.3 million. Works below the value of UA 3 million will be undertaken using
the NCB procedures.
55. In addition, at community level a number of undetermined works or community
infrastructure valued in aggregate at (UA 4.63 million) will be carried out based on a demand
driven development model by community groups. Such civil works with estimated values
between UA 100,000 and UA 50,000 will be procured following the Local Competitive
Bidding (LCB) procedures (modified NCB at local level). For values less than UA 50,000
Local Shopping by soliciting competitive bids from a minimum of three qualified contractors
shall be used. Considering that the works of values below UA 50,000 will be scattered and
shall be carried out in remote rural settings, direct contracting may be used in place of local
shopping with acceptable justification subject to prior Bank approval.
56. The use of ICB for the centrally procured road rehabilitation works is justified
considering the monetary value, the scope. The use of Local Competitive Bidding and
shopping for the majority of the demand driven procurements is justified as the works are
scattered over a wide area and the size of the works involved are sSecretariatl in financial
value and scope and are unlikely to attract bids from other parts of the country or outside
Zambia. In addition, there are many local contractors sufficiently qualified to ensure
competitive bidding through LCB and shopping. Additionally the country has adequate
capacity at local level to carry out such sSecretariatl value works.
57. Goods: At the Central level, Contracts for goods grouped to an aggregate value equal
and exceeding UA 300,000, ICB will be used and if the estimated value of contracts is
between UA 300,000 and UA 100,000 National Competitive Bidding (NCB) will be used
which include Motor vehicles (UA 280,000), while goods below the value of UA 100,000
will be procured using the shopping method and will include motorcycles (UA 90,000),
office equipment (UA 20,000) and furniture (UA 10,000).
58. At the community level, shopping procedures will be used for values less than UA
50,000. Such goods will include unspecified procurements under the demand driven
component. Shopping procedure shall consist of the soliciting of price quotations from at
least three qualified suppliers. Such eligible goods shall be specified in the Participatory
Adaptation Implementation Manual. Direct contracting using unit prices prevailing in the
area for comparison may be allowed when there are insufficient suppliers available.
59. The shopping method has been selected for central level procurements for the goods
with value up to UA 100,000 because most of the established suppliers have strong
representatives in Zambia and such low value procurements are not likely to attract
international suppliers.
60. Consulting Services: Procurement of consulting services valued above UA 200,000
will be procured using the Quality and Cost Based Selection method. Consulting services
- 35 -
valued in total at UA 5.47 million will include the recruitment of civil works supervision
consultants (UA 534,000), Fund Manager for the Marching Grants (UA 380,000) and the
three (3) NGOs (contracts valued in total at UA 2.34 million) with demonstrated experience
in facilitating climate resilience in the target districts to provide support to the Districts and
the communities in participatory adaptation. These services will be procured competitively
through the Quality and Cost Based Selection (QCBS) method. In case of local NGOs hired
to support community activities, where acceptable justification is provided, shall be single
sourced. The Financial Audit (UA 80,000) will be procured using the Least Cost Selection
(LCS) method. Short Term Technical Assistance (UA 30,000) and long term consultancy
support to the secretariat (contracts for project individual consultants valued in total at UA
710,000) will be recruited competitively in accordance with the Bank rules for recruitment of
Individual Consultants. All the services other than those demanded under sub-project
activities by community groups will be procured at the central level. Farm level support (UA
1.32 million) will be procured through the appointment of Bank approved agency well
established in this activity. Services for community based training, seminars and workshops
will be provided by NGOs and consultants including national educational institutions. Such
training and workshops amounting to UA 80,000 will be carried out on the basis of approved
annual training programmes and work plans and budgets that will specify the training needs,
nature of activities and the cost. The training programmes and work plans will be prior
reviewed and approved by the Bank. When the amount of the contract is less than UA
200,000, the Borrower may limit the publication of a Specific Procurement Notice (SPN)
requesting for expressions of interest to national or regional newspapers. However, any
eligible consultant, being regional or not, may express his desire to be short-listed.
61. Operation Costs: At central level operating expenses amounting to UA 860,000 will
be undertaken using the existing Executing Agency operational systems to cover
incremental allowances, designing and printing of promotional materials and other project
documentation, maintenance of equipment and motor vehicles as well as other approved
administrative and miscellaneous expenses. At community level sub-projects’ operational
activities and incremental expenses including the accountability requirements will be in
accordance with the guidelines to be outlined in the Participatory Adaptation Implementation
Manual.
62 Assessment of the Executing Agency: The Secretariat under the Ministry of Finance
which shall be the Executing Agency will be responsible for the procurement of goods,
works, and services. An assessment of the capacity of the Executing Agency to implement
procurement actions for the project has been carried out by the Bank. The objectives of the
assessment are to (a) evaluate the capability of the implementing agency and the adequacy of
procurement and related systems in place; (b) assess the institutional and procedural risks that
may negatively affect the ability of the agency to carry out the procurement process; (c)
develop and incorporate mitigation measures to address the identified deficiencies and
minimize the risks identified. The assessment reviewed the organizational structure for
implementing the project and the interaction between the project’s staff responsible for
procurement activities and the Executing Agency’s relevant support for administration and
finance. The resources, capacity, expertise and experience of the Secretariat are inadequate
and therefore shall require additional support with project specific staff to carry out the day to
day management of the project including procurement activities.
63. The procurement capacity assessment of the Ministry of Finance revealed that there is
inadequate staff both in terms of numbers and relevant experience in Bank procurement
- 36 -
procedures. To address these weaknesses, one procurement staff from another ministry has
been placed at the secretariat. The project will also support an extra procurement specialist
with experience in Bank procurement procedures and procurement under community based
investment projects (CBIP) while the specialized procurements (civil works –roads) in the
Kafue basin will be supported by the RDA at the Ministry of Transport, Works, Supply and
Communications. The project will also benefit from the consultancy assignment being
carried out by ASCO Consulting Firm who are carrying out studies for the civil works
component (under the supervision of the secretariat and supported by RDA). The consultant
will develop the Detailed Designs, an Environmental and Social Management Plan as well as
Tender Documents for the rehabilitation of the roads under the project.
64. The internal control of procurement processing is considerably effective; however,
there is need for termination of the dual responsibilities of the Zambia Public Procurement
Authority and establishing an independent review panel (mechanism). The ZPPA is
mandated to oversee public procurement to ensure Procuring Entities (PEs) comply with the
Act. Procurement activities are subject to regular auditing by the office of the Auditor
General. Furthermore, Zambia has recently put in place a new anti-corruption policy and the
institutional arrangement for investigations of corruption cases. Under the Act, suppliers,
contractors, and consultants are suspended or barred from participating in procurement for
any fraudulent and corrupt activities. Sections 72-74 of the Act provide for code of conduct
by public officials, bidders and suppliers (including contractors and consultants). The ZPPA
has also recently drafted a code of conduct for the public officers involved in public
procurement. Essentially, therefore, the necessary institutions and mechanisms are in place
for internal controls of the public procurement environment.
65. The Ministry of Finance practices adequate procurement and financial record keeping
and has been handling similar projects in an acceptable manner. The Ministry has adequate
control mechanism in procurement processing. The relevant project staff shall prepare all
procurement requisitions which shall be approved by superiors at the secretariat in
conformity with project requirements. The Specific procurement notices shall be approved
and advertised where necessary while under shopping a minimum of three quotations shall be
obtained for the approval of one supplier or service provider and this also goes for where
internal systems shall apply based on prior approved work plans. All tenders are evaluated by
an appointed evaluation committee whose recommendations are submitted to the Ministry’s
Tender Committee for approval before contract award. While the country’s Office of the
Auditor General carries out audits all government institutions, internal audit arrangements are
also in place. Essentially, therefore, the necessary institutions, mechanisms and measures are
in place for internal efficiency and controls.
66. The other mitigation measures taken are to ensure that the implementation
arrangements are such that procurement processing and decision making are not only
accountable but also efficient to enhance timely implementation. Procurement procedures for
the demand driven component will be incorporated in a Participatory Adaptation
Implementation Manual.
67. General Procurement Notice: The GPN text will be discussed and agreed with the
GRZ at negotiations and this will be issued for publication in the “United Nations
Development Business Journal” upon approval of the Financing by the Bank’s Board of
Directors.
- 37 -
68. Procurement Plan: The Borrower has developed a Procurement Plan for project
implementation for an initial period of 18 Months which provides the basis for the
procurement packages and methods. This Procurement Plan will be updated by the
Borrower’s Project Team quarterly or as required to reflect the actual project implementation
needs and improvements in institutional capacity. Any revisions proposed to the Procurement
Plan shall be submitted to the Bank for no objection. The Borrower shall implement the
Procurement Plan in the manner in which it has been agreed with the Bank.
- 38 -
- 39 -
69. Review Procedures: For all activities requiring Prior Review, the following
documents are subject to review and approval by the Bank before promulgation (except
where post-procurement rules apply): Specific Procurement Notices; Tender
documents/Requests for Proposals; Tender Evaluations/Evaluation of Proposals' reports,
including recommendations for contract award; and Draft Contracts, if these have been
amended from drafts included in tender documents.
70. Review Thresholds - Procurement of Goods, Works and Services: Procurement
Decisions subject to Prior Review by the Bank as stated in Appendix 1 to the Bank Rules and
Procedures for Procurement of Goods, Works and Services will be as follows:
Table B.5.3: Prior-Review Thresholds – Goods and Works
N° Procurement Method Prior-Review Thresholds UA
1 ICB (Works) All contracts
2 NCB (Works) Above 500,000
- 40 -
3 NCB (Goods) Above 100,000
4 Shopping (Goods) Above 50,000
5 Direct Contracting (Goods and Works) All Contracts Regardless of Value
Table B.5.4: Prior-Review Thresholds – Consultants
No Selection Method Prior-Review Thresholds (UA)
1. Competitive Methods (Firms/NGOs) Above 200,000
2. Competitive Method (Individual) Above 20,000
3. Single Source (Firms/Individual) All Contracts Regardless of Value
Shortlist comprising entirely of national consultants: Short list of consultants for
services, estimated to cost less than UA 200,000 equivalent per contract, may comprise
entirely of national consultants in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 2.7 of
the Rules and Procedures for the Use of Consultants.
71. Frequency of Procurement Post Review Missions: In addition to the prior review
supervision missions, bi-annual procurement post review missions will be conducted by the
Bank. The Executing Agency will maintain all relevant procurement records in accordance
with Bank requirements for all procurements subject to post review. Post Review is
recommended where the works, goods and services involved are of sSecretariatl values
(Below UA 100,000; to be procured through Local Competitive Bidding and Local
Shopping). For this reason all Community Level procurements will be subject to post review
and training for this level will be done supported by simplified procurement guidelines which
will be included in the Participatory Adaptation Implementation Manual to be used by sub-
projects. The Executing Agency and community groups shall keep a record of all relevant
procurement documents (Procurement Notices, Solicitation Documents, Evaluation Reports,
Contracts etc.) in compliance with the Bank’s Prior Review requirements (Appendix 1 of the
Bank Rules) and for audit purposes.
72. Global Action Plan for improvement to National Procurement Procedures: The
following discrepancies with the Bank’s Rules and Procedures have been identified in the
national procurement law for Zambia (ZPPA ACT) and regulations and hence the National
Procurement Procedures shall not be used for procurement activities financed by the Bank.
The table below shows the issues and required actions as outlined in the National
Procurement Procedures assessment report conducted by the Bank in June 2011.
Table B.5.5: Global Action Plan for Improvement of National Procurement Procedures
Issues Raises in the NPP Assessment Report for
Zambia Required Changes
Discrepancies identified in the National Procurement Act and its Regulations – Zambia
Principle of Eligibility: Eligibility of foreign bidders Revise the Act to include provisions for Eligibility of
foreign bidders (Bank Rules Clauses 1.6)
Principle of Fairness: Independent Complaints Review
and Appeals Mechanisms: No independent complaint
and appeals review mechanism
Revise the Act to include provisions independent
complaint and appeals review mechanism (Rules Clause
1.2).
- 41 -
Issues Raises in the NPP Assessment Report for
Zambia Required Changes
Principle of Fairness: Application of margin of
domestic preference: Unclear margin of domestic
preference
Revise the Act to include provision margin of domestic
preference (Bank Rules Clause 2.55),
Principle of Fairness: Dual role of ZPPA in
procurement decisions and oversight.
Revise the Act to remove provision on the dual role of
ZPPA in procurement decisions and oversight (Bank Rules
Clause 1.2).
Discrepancies identified in the National Standard Bidding Documents
The SBDs for Goods and Works do not meet Bank
requirements due various deviations reflected in the
Act and regulations.
Revise the Act and subsequently the SBDs for Goods
and Works taking into account all Bank’s Rules and/or
based on Bank’s SBDs and issue them for use by
Procuring entities.
ANNEX B6 : FINANCIAL AND ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
73. The financial and economic assessment is based on the assumptions that: (i) the
project will be fully implemented and in a timely manner; (ii) The project is expected to
generate direct benefits for about 800,000 people, 300,000 of which were expected to live
below current poverty line; (iii) the number of possible farm households is 160,000, on the
basis of 5 family members; (iv) the size of the potential farmland is 240,000 ha, on the basis
of an average farm size of 1.5 ha, of which 96,000 ha or 40% of the potential farmland can be
cropped; (v) only 45% of the cropland or 43,200 ha are considered for cropping and 52,800
ha are the natural tree cover for the ecological balance, in line with good farming practices;
(vi) the period of the analysis is 20 years, in accordance with the cropping cycle patterns and
the duration of the farm investment; (vii) The average opportunity cost of capital estimated at
11.5 % was used for discounting, as the project resources are fungible and can be used for
other alternative uses, including in sectors other than the climate resilience; and (vii) the
assessment of the project’s worth was carried with respect to the overall project cost, as
opposed to a component-by-component approach analysis, as components are not
implemented on a stand-alone basis.
74. On the basis of the above-captured assumptions, the project is expected generate the
following benefits: (i) improved production of non-timber forest products from the 52,800-ha
natural tree cover, such as, honey, mushrooms, medicinal plants, edible fruits, grains and
plants, products from game ranching; (ii) Improved crop production from 43,200 ha,
including, sugarcane, cotton, maize, cassava, vegetables, and legumes; (iii) improved
livestock products, such as, chicken, goats, sheep, and pigs; (iv) improved fish production
from the restocking of ponds and water bodies. (v) indirect benefits, such as: (a) project
worth resulting from carbon sequestration, (b) reduction of post-harvest losses (PHL), as
result of establishment of access roads connecting farms to markets, (c) improved welfare
resulting from access to social services, with the reduction of the medical bill, and
(d) reduction of women household chores (whc); thereby increasing the productivity in
cropping requiring women labor. These benefits that were captured in the analysis can be
summarized as follows:
Summary of Project Benefits N° Non-timber forest
products Crops Production Livestock
Production Fisheries Production
Indirect Benefits
- 42 -
1 Honey Sugarcane Poultry Fresh water fish Reduction in PHL
2 Mushrooms Cotton SSecretariatl ruminants
Aquaculture fish Carbon sequestration
3 Medicinal plants Maize Pigs Population welfare
4 Edible fruits & grains Cassava Reduction in WHC
5 Game ranching Vegetables
6 Legumes
75. Financial Performance: the financial analysis was carried with Farmod approach
based on: (i) crop and activity models using prevailing 2013 market prices of productions and
inputs (investment and operating inputs, including, planting materials, fertilizers, irrigation,
sSecretariatl equipment, and labor); (ii) area/family household models or farm models; and
(iii) farm distribution. In this condition, the analysis generated NPV, IRR and B/C ratio equal
to 356.22 million, 15.12 % and 1.61, respectively, as captured below:
SUMMARY OF THE FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
(MZW million)
ITEMS
Situation without project
Situation with project
1 to 20 1 2 3 4 5 6 to 20
PRODUCTION 900,70 900,70 1 600,70 3 498,23 5 465,11 6 017,10 8 921,28
Sugarcane 132,00 132,00 132,00 667,01 900,46 1 215,63 1 641,09
Cotton 108,70 108,70 108,70 501,22 676,65 913,47 1 233,19
Food Crops (Maize & Rice Income) 336,60 336,60 693,60 1 188,30 1 982,88 1 982,88 3 083,97
Vegetables (Potatoes, Beans & Tomatoes Income)
115,5 115,5 238 407,75 680,4 680,4 1 058,23
Fisheries Income 56,1 56,1 115,6 198,05 330,48 330,48 514,00
Livestock (SSecretariatl Ruminants & Pigs Income)
151,8 151,8 312,8 535,9 894,24 894,24 1 390,81
PRODUCTION COSTS
Sugarcane Production Investment 0,00 9 988,51 8 172,41 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00
Sugarcane Inputs Costs 93,85 93,85 147,47 252,81 421,36 421,36 655,56
Sugarcane Operating Costs 250,26 250,26 393,27 674,17 1123,62 1123,62 1748,17
Sugarcane Hired Labor Costs 156,41 156,41 245,79 421,36 702,26 702,26 1092,61
Sugarcane Production Taxes 130,82 130,82 205,57 352,41 587,35 587,35 913,82
Food Crops Investment Equipment 105,52 105,52 217,44 372,53 621,63 621,63 966,82
Food Crops Inputs & Operating Costs
57,56 57,56 118,61 203,20 339,07 339,07 527,36
Food Crops Production Labor 47,97 47,97 98,84 169,33 282,56 282,56 439,47
Vegetables Investment Equipment 34,94 34,94 72,00 123,34 205,82 205,82 320,11
Vegetables Inputs & Operaing Costs
19,06 19,06 39,27 67,28 112,27 112,27 174,61
Vegetables Production Labor 15,88 15,88 32,73 56,07 93,56 93,56 145,51
Fisheries Production Investment 15,74 15,74 32,43 55,55 92,70 92,70 144,18
Fisheries Operating Costs 8,01 8,01 16,51 28,28 47,19 47,19 73,40
Fisheries Production Labor 5,72 5,72 11,79 20,20 33,71 33,71 52,43
Fisheries Production Taxes 2,00 2,00 4,13 7,07 11,80 11,80 18,35
Livestock Production Investment 39,24 39,24 80,86 138,53 231,16 231,16 359,52
Livestock Operating Costs 21,40 21,40 44,10 75,56 126,09 126,09 196,10
Livestock Production Labor 17,84 17,84 36,75 62,97 105,07 105,07 163,42
PROJECT COSTS (Revised) 0,00 1 150,54 928,64 550,00 97,02 213,35 0,00
Discounted Factor @11,5% OCC
NPV = 356.005.765,22; B/C Ratio = 1,61; IRR=15,12%
SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS
Decrease in commodity Prices Corresponding IRR Value
- 43 -
-5% 15,12%
-10% 14,75%
-15% 14,02%
-20% 13,37%
-25% 12,91%
Switching Value
-34.01% 11.50% (*)
76. Economic Performance: The economic analysis was conducted with the same
approach on the basis of shadow prices (prices in conditions of efficient market operation) of
tradable crops (maize, cotton, and sugar cane) or parity prices at farm gate (farm gate prices).
Although maize is not exported, it was treated in the analysis, as import substitute. In
addition, other benefits were included, such as, the carbon sequestration, farm to market
access road benefits (increase volume and frequency of marketable crops), access to social
services benefits (reduction in the medical bill) and the reduction of women’s households’
chores (increased productivity). However, these additional benefits which were computed
using dose responses, captured benefits only partially. In these conditions, the economic
analysis yielded an NPV, ERR and B/C ratio equal to 489.11 million, 16.89% and 2.02,
respectively, as captured hereafter:
SUMMARY OF THE ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
(MZW million)
ITEMS Situation without project Situation with project
1 to 20 1 2 3 4 5 6 to 20
PRODUCTION 2 230,30 2 230,30 3 580,32 5 827,16 9 579,56 9 784,04 15 057,95
Sugarcane 1 137,55 1 137,55 1 787,57 3 064,41 5 107,35 5 107,35 7 946,22
Cotton 432,75 432,75 432,75 432,75 584,21 788,69 1 064,73
Food Crops (Maize & Rice Income) 336,60 336,60 693,60 1 188,30 1 982,88 1 982,88 3 083,97
Vegetables (Potatoes, Beans & Tomatoes Income) 115,5 115,5 238 407,75 680,40 680,40 1 058,23
Fisheries Income 56,1 56,1 115,6 198,05 330,48 330,48 514,00
Livestock (SSecretariatl Ruminants & Pigs Income) 151,8 151,8 312,8 535,9 894,24 894,24 1 390,81
Credit from Carbon sequestration 0 0 0 98,77 113,59 130,62 150,22
Savings in Medical Bill 0 0 0 59,55 65,51 72,06 79,26
Gains from Reduction of PHL 0 0 0 135,33 155,63 178,97 205,82
9.00%
10.00%
11.00%
12.00%
13.00%
14.00%
15.00%
16.00%
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30%
I
R
R
Decrease in Commodities Prices
- 44 -
ITEMS Situation without project Situation with project
1 to 20 1 2 3 4 5 6 to 20
Increased Productivity of Women 0 0 0 27,24 32,69 39,23 47,07
PRODUCTION COSTS
Sugarcane Production Investment 0,00 9 596,70 8 005,55 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00
Sugarcane Inputs Costs 93,85 93,85 147,47 252,81 421,36 421,36 655,56
Sugarcane Operating Costs 250,26 250,26 393,27 674,17 1123,62 1123,62 1748,17
Sugarcane Hired Labor Costs 156,41 156,41 245,79 421,36 702,26 702,26 1092,61
Sugarcane Production Taxes 130,82 130,82 205,57 352,41 587,35 587,35 913,82
Food Crops Investment Equipment 105,52 105,52 217,44 372,53 621,63 621,63 966,82
Food Crops Inputs & Operating Costs 57,56 57,56 118,61 203,20 339,07 339,07 527,36
Food Crops Production Labor 47,97 47,97 98,84 169,33 282,56 282,56 439,47
Vegetables Investment Equipment 34,94 34,94 72,00 123,34 205,82 205,82 320,11
Vegetables Inputs & Operaing Costs 19,06 19,06 39,27 67,28 112,27 112,27 174,61
Vegetables Production Labor 15,88 15,88 32,73 56,07 93,56 93,56 145,51
Fisheries Production Investment 15,74 15,74 32,43 55,55 92,70 92,70 144,18
Fisheries Operating Costs 8,01 8,01 16,51 28,28 47,19 47,19 73,40
Fisheries Production Labor 5,72 5,72 11,79 20,20 33,71 33,71 52,43
Livestock Production Investment 39,24 39,24 80,86 138,53 231,16 231,16 359,52
Livestock Operating Costs 21,40 21,40 44,10 75,56 126,09 126,09 196,10
Livestock Production Labor 17,84 17,84 36,75 62,97 105,07 105,07 163,42
PROJECT COSTS 0,00 950,54 928,64 550,00 97,02 213,35 0,00
Discounted Factor @10% OCC 1,00 0,8969 0,8044 0,7214 0,6470 0,5803
NPV = 489.108.285,35; B/C Ratio = 2,02; ERR=16,89%
SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS
Decrease in commodity Prices Corresponding ERR Value
-5% 16,89%
-10% 16,05%
-15% 15,71%
-20% 15,11%
-25% 14,68%
Switching Value
-41.22% 11.50% (*)
(*) OCC: opportunity Cost of Capital
9.00%
10.00%
11.00%
12.00%
13.00%
14.00%
15.00%
16.00%
17.00%
18.00%
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30%
E
R
R
Decrease in Commodities Prices
- 45 -
- 46 -
ANNEX B7: ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL ANALYSIS
77. The National Conservation Strategy (NCS) was adopted as a policy document by the
Government of the Republic of Zambia in 1985 which led to the establishment of
environmental legislation and institutional set up in the country. The Environmental Impact
Assessment (EIA) process in Zambia is governed by the provisions of the Environmental
Protection and Pollution Control Act (EPPCA) No. 12 of 1990, Statutory Instrument No. 28
of 1997–the Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations. Under EPPCA, it is mandatory
that all development plans, policies and projects undergo a process of environmental impact
assessment and an administrative clearance by the Zambia Environmental Management
Agency (ZEMA) in conformity with the provision of the Act. ZEMA is a statutory body
created under the EPPC Act in 1992 with the mandate of environmental protection, pollution
control, and monitoring implementation of mitigation measures highlighted in environmental
and social management plans. SCRIKA is covered by a Strategic Environmental and Social
Assessment (SESA) which was prepared by the NCCS in accordance with the Zambia
environmental regulations and the AfDB’s Environmental and Social Assessment Procedures
(ESAP:2001).
78. The Project is classified as Environment Category 2. It is expected to generate both
positive social-economic and environmental impacts that will outweigh the likely negative
impacts. The infrastructure to be developed/rehabilitated will be small-scale in nature
(community level infrastructure) and hence will not induce any potential, significant or
irreversible environmental and social impacts. In addition, the project will not involve land
acquisition or resettlement. The negative impacts will include: (a) increase in soil erosion
related to construction and rehabilitation activities particularly in degraded lands with loose
soils, (b) Increased turbidity in water sources from effluent or runoff containing high content
of suspended solids from construction sites. In addition, accidental spillage of fuel, lubricants
and other chemicals used in the construction process and wastewater from workers’ camp
would likely be a source of water contamination, (c) Limited clearance of vegetation covers
during the construction phase may occur at the construction sites, and at borrow pits.
Removal of vegetation cover would increase erosion potentials and dusts generation into the
air. The level of impacts depends on: land area to be cleared and density of existing
vegetation cover, which is associated with the amount of waste to be generated and physical
characteristics of the soil, (d) Increased localized noise levels and vibration due to
earthmoving equipment and machinery, construction plants and construction activities such
as piling, excavation or installation of equipment, loading of construction materials, concrete
pouring, drilling. Increased localized noise levels usually occur in short term. The scope of
impacts would depend on (i) number, frequency and working durations of noise sources, and
(ii) time of the day (night time), (e) Reduced localized air quality due to dust from
construction sites and surrounding areas, include the areas along materials transportation
route affect localized air quality. Increased dust level along the road used for transportation of
as granular construction materials drop, dust from temporary loading of granular construction
materials such as sand or stockpile from excavation works, dusts from construction waste
dumping sites. The impacts usually last in a relative short time, are of low magnitude but can
causes nuisances to local people, and disturb local daily life. The scope of impacts depends
on, (i) the number and frequency of vehicles in use, (ii) the quantity of granular materials to
be temporarily loaded at a time, (iii) the size of the granular materials, and (iv) weather
conditions, and dust emissions, (f) During the operational phase the likely impacts would
include solid waste and effluent from the agro-processing.
- 47 -
79. Positive impacts on the environment are likely to result from the community-driven
adaptation activities which promote the use of sustainable land and water management
practices incorporated into the main agricultural production systems. The adaptation activities
will include micro-projects for flood control and diversion structures, small-scale irrigation
schemes, improved wells and boreholes, reforestation of small-scale community forestry,
conservation agriculture, livestock and fisheries for diversification of farming systems, etc.
Positive environmental impact will likely include reduced soil and water erosion, increased
soil fertility through moisture retention, safeguards/buffers against floods (increased
resilience against climate variability in the form of floods), and potential in reducing
greenhouse gas emissions through the use of approaches such as conservation agriculture.
Potential positive impacts include improved moisture retention and soil composition from
agriculture diversification, control of soil erosion, increased agro-biodiversity, reduced water
stress, control of disease vectors, and enhanced community skills for better land use planning
and management.
80. Positive socio-economic impacts will be generated from increased agricultural
productivity which in turn will generate multiplier effects on the targeted communities
through increased income and creation of job opportunities especially to the thirty percent of
targeted women. Rehabilitation works on the existing rural roads will entail upgrading of
drainage systems to climate proofed design standards, dredging and erosion control measures
(embankment stabilization with earthworks and vegetative approaches). The infrastructure
works will enhance the climate resilience of against floods. The road works will be limited to
existing road alignment and right of way.
81. Climate Change: The Project area is experiencing increased frequency and intensity
of droughts, as well as periods of floods. The project activities will promote climate change
adaptation and foster livelihoods diversification which will ultimately enhance the climate
change adaptive capacity of the communities and natural resources production systems. The
Project will support sustainable land and water management technologies, water storage
infrastructure, conservation agriculture, etc. in building the adaptive capacity of the farmers
and the agricultural production systems, and climate proof farm-to-market rural roads to
enable them to withstand period of floods. Over the last four decades, the Kafue basin has
experienced an increased mean annual temperature of 1.3 degrees C, and decreased mean
rainfall of 1.9mm/month, whereas rainfall seasons have become less predictable and shorter,
with rainfall occurring in fewer but more intense events. From 2000 to 2007, the intensity and
frequency of droughts and floods and the number of people affected has also changed, with a
net trend towards more floods and, over a longer time-period, droughts. Moreover, the area
affected by floods and droughts appears to have expanded. The 2006/07 floods affected 41
districts in nine provinces, and the 2004/05 drought left nearly two thirds of Zambia with
little or no rainfall. Both average annual temperature and rainfall are projected to increase by
3.6 degrees C and 3% respectively by 2100. The predominant coping strategies adopted by
the communities, include, reducing meal quantities, numbers and composition (shifting to a
vegetable only diet and relying on less preferred wild foods. The Project activities will
promote climate change adaptation and foster diversification of livelihoods which will
ultimately enhance the climate change adaptive capacity farmers and natural ecosystems. The
project will significantly support the adoption of sustainable management of land and water
resources, strengthen adaptive capacity of communities through training and develop skills
and demonstration sites for conservation during the dry seasons, restoration of degraded lands
and increased vegetation cover with different drought perennials.
- 48 -
82. Instittutional Arrangements: The Project will strengthen the capacity of the Secretariat
in undertaking safeguard issues by supporting the procurement of a safeguard specialist.
ZEMA as a regulatory agency is professionally staffed with demonstrated effective
enforcement of environmental regulations. ZEMA works closely with the Environmental
Officers at the line Ministries who are responsible for site level environmental management
of project activities. The Secretariat as the executing agency will be required to prepare site-
specific design stage ESIA studies during implementation of the Project in compliance with
the Zambia EIA Law and the Bank’s Environmental and Social Assessment Procedures.
Annual Audits on the implementation of ESMPs will be prepared by the Secretariat and
submitted to ZEMA. The Secretariat bears the full responsibility of preparing the studies.
During project implementation, supervision and monitoring will be very crucial to ensure that
the proposed mitigation measures are implemented. The Secretariat together with ZEMA will
responsible for monitoring of the environmental and social aspects of the Project. Indicators
for monitoring changes in the physical, biological and socio-economic environments should
be developed during the preparation of the design stage site specific ESIA and ESMPs, and
the monitoring component fully elaborated as part of the detailed site specific assessments.
- 49 -
Table 1: Summary of Environmental and Social Management Plan
SUBPROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS MITIGATION/ENHANCEMENT MEASURE(S) RESPONSIBILITY CAPACITY BUILDING
Agriculture and Livestock
Practices
Land Husbandry
Introducing/scaling-up
conservation tillage and
soil moisture retention -
improved management
of soil moisture through
use of mulch/organic
matter and conservation
of soil organic matter;
Increased pressure on land as
demand is likely to be triggered by
improved incomes from good soil
management and moisture retention
Intensives use of land may lead to
unsustainable land use practices such
as increased/inappropriate use of
pesticides and fertilisers
Increased land clearing that may
result in deforestation, land
degradation and soil erosion
“Composting” of animal manure, grass and plant
material for application to fields – for increased
soil moisture retention and improved soil texture
in sandy areas such as those the Barotse Sub-
basin
Use of mulch/organic material to reduce loss of
soil moisture through evapotranspiration
Sensitisation and capacity building on land
planning use management
Promotion of good land use planning and
practices such as terracing on steep slopes
Promotion of agroforestry as part of erosion
control measures
Promote erosion control along areas adjacent to
the canals
SPIU
MOF district
extension staff
DTOs
NGOs/CBOs
Sensitisation campaigns on
land management in the
context of climate change
Training in environmental
and land husbandry practices
Training in conflict resolution
Strengthening of extension
skills and mentoring support
provided by both government
and NGO facilitators
Crop Husbandry
Diversifying
agricultural
practices such as
crops/varieties
grown including
those that can be
drought tolerant or
grown under water
logged conditions
or staggering time
of plantings;
Changing times for
applying
agriculture inputs
to take advantage
of available
moisture and
rainfall;
All year round crop production is
likely to increase demand for water
leading to construction of weirs and
small dams which may affect water
flows downstream,
Diversification to climate resilient
crops may introduce some invasive
species
Use of chemical fertilizers likely
impact the environment and affect
the quality of water in the rivers and
streams
Increased crop production will likely
increase the use of
herbicides/pesticides which will
affect the environment and the
quality of water
Increased crop production likely
increase demand for improvement of
market centres and access (feeder)
roads and farm-to-market road
network which will impact the
environment (see section on rural
Introduce good practices for water resources
sharing and management that reduce/eliminate
water conflicts
Utilise furrows and drainage canals to drain
excess water from fields to allow early planting
Utilise water conservation technologies and
strategies to reduce demand for ground and
surface water
Introduce good crop husbandry planning and
farming best practices that include ideal timing
for planting and application of soil nutrients
Promotion of organic farming alongside
conservation agriculture
Introduce management plans for appropriate use
of fertilisers
Develop a pesticide management plan (PMP)
that adheres to WB and AfDB safeguard policies
and ZEMA regulations
Promote use of integrated pest management and
only use herbicides/pesticides as a last resort
particularly near rivers, streams, canals and small
dams
Use pesticides/agro-chemicals with short residual
SPIU
MOF district
extension staff
DTOs
NGOs/CBOs
Sensitisation campaigns on
crop and horticultural
production in the context of
climate resilience
Training in climate resilient
agricultural practices
Training in good fertiliser and
pest/pesticide management in
environmentally sensitive
environments
Training in post-harvest
technologies, value addition
and marketing
Sensitisation in basic
requirements of
environmental safeguard
policies and local legislation
- 50 -
roads below) period
Avoid introducing alien plant species or crop
varieties that may be invasive
Animal Husbandry
Diversifying livestock
production (small
livestock raised) and
when appropriate
culturally or land-use
wise use /or integration
of crops and livestock
(e.g. goats, sheep,
chickens) in a mixed
farming system
Improved management
of pastures/ grazing land
Livestock production
(increase proportion of
climate resilient
livestock or increased
livestock variety)
Clearing of land to create grazing
fields
Increased numbers of climate
resilient livestock may result in over
exploitation of natural resources that
include water and pasture land
Contamination of water bodies at
livestock watering points/crossing
points
Unsustainable use of wetlands for
grazing and watering animals during
dry periods of the year may disrupt
wetland ecological processes
introduce mixed farming approaches by
integrating crop and livestock production systems
avoid overgrazing due to overstocking through
effective control of livestock numbers staying
within carrying capacity of the land
Put in place effective soil erosion control
measures for managing pastures and reduces
contamination of water at livestock watering
points
Where feasible and culturally acceptable,
consider introduction of rotational grazing and
zero-grazing supported by production of fodder
crops
Mix different livestock species (goats, sheep,
cattle, donkeys) to fully exploit vegetation
resources
Where feasible, consider reforestation and
replanting of climate tolerant grass varieties
Community sensitization on good pasture
management and use of communal feedlots and
introduction of fodder crops
SPIU
MOF district
extension staff
DTOs
NGOs/CBOs
Sensitisation campaigns on
livestock diversification and
pasture management
Training in good livestock
production, including
breeding
Sensitisation in basic
requirements of
environmental safeguard
policies and local legislation
Small-Scale Aquaculture-
Construction/rehabilitation of
fish ponds in order to ensure
supply of fish throughout the
year
Restocking of fish ponds
Poor aquaculture management may
disturb the bio-diversity of the
ecosystem
Aquaculture may result in the
introduction of alien fish species
some of which may be invasive
Select locations which do not have other
important land uses e.g. use of existing
depressions, hollows and ditches.
Avoid siting points adjacent to areas with high
biodiversity values
Construct ponds in a manner that ensures good
drainage and erosion control
Plant vegetation (trees and grasses) on the edges
and between ponds
Good aquaculture management should be
promoted to ensure that there are no direct threats
to the ecosystem and to the indigenous fish
species.
SPIU
MOF district
extension staff
Fisheries Dept.
DTOs
NGOs/CBOs
Specialised training in
aquaculture management
through short courses and/or
exchange visits
Training in biodiversity
management and
conservation of fragile
ecosystems through short
courses and/or exchange
visits
Community level water
Infrastructure(boreholes ,
wells small dams, reservoirs,
weirs, small scale Irrigation
Schemes)
Inadequate access to water may lead
to inappropriate use or over
exploitation of existing resources
such as wetlands
flooding likely to lead to loss of
Rehabilitate boreholes/wells that provide water in
all seasons
Construction of small-scale water regulation
structures (flood gates, canals, weirs and small
dams)
SPIU
MOF district
extension staff
Water Affairs
Dept.
Basic training in integrated
water resources management
and conservation of natural
habitats through short courses
and/or exchange visits
- 51 -
To provide access to water
during prolonged droughts
Prevent waterlogging and
manage water flows during
prolonged flooding
Water aquaculture
production
flood control, erosion
control
recreation facility for local
tourism
-
natural habitat and altered aquatic
life
Disruption of water flow
downstream
Disruption of fish migration
Disruption of flow of sediments with
a high nutrient value
Siltation in the absence of good
erosion control
Water logging
Soil erosion and degradation
Clearing of vegetation to increase
irrigated area
Increased use of agrochemicals and
fertilizers due to increase agricultural
production under irrigation scheme
Construction of ponds/canals for water retention,
storage and drainage
Avoid construction of small water structures near
or adjacent to protected areas or natural habitats
e.g. wetlands
Planting of trees and grasses to protect dam walls
as soil erosion prevention measure
Promote appropriate use of fertilizers and agro
chemicals in the area near or adjacent to the small
dam or reservoir or canals
Siting of small irrigation schemes in less climate
sensitive terrain such steep slopes
Promote cultivation of crops that require less
water
Ensure full community involvement in the
control and distribution of water
DTOs
NGOs/CBOs
Basic training in water use
and resource management in
relation to smallholder under
irrigation through short
courses and/or exchange
visits
Wildlife Sanctuaries,
communal game ranching
In areas near national parks and
game management areas,
infrastructural sub-projects may lead
to destruction of natural habitat that
result in the
- displacement of wildlife;
- blocking of wildlife
migration routes
- competition for pasture
between domestic and wild
animals
Fencing off of protected wildlife habitats
(national parks and game management areas)
Consider the possibility of establishing wildlife
sanctuaries or wild life estates linked to income
generation through tourism
Establish communal game ranching to ensure
conservation of wildlife/natural resources
supported by income generation through tourism
and controlled game hunting
SPIU
MOF district
extension staff
DTOs
NGOs/CBOs
Specialised training in
wildlife management and
game ranching
Training in biodiversity
management and
conservation of fragile
ecosystems
Training Business
management and
entrepreneurial skills through
short courses and/or
exchange visits
Community forests,
reforestation
Effective benefit-sharing
ensures sustainable
management of community
forests
Increased pressure on land due to
increased farming activities may
result in unsustainable utilisation of
natural resources such as
deforestation, encroachment on
watershed areas and dambos, soil
erosion etc.
Illegal logging of timber may lead to
large scale deforestation and
destruction of natural habitats
Introduction of invasive tree species
(e.g. black wattle) may threaten the
ecosystem
Establishment of forests managed by the
community drawing on local culture, traditions
and indigenous knowledge
Avoid locating forests near or adjacent to
protected areas such as wetlands, watershed and
areas with high biodiversity value e.g. the Kafue
Flats and Barotse Plains
Establishment of tree nurseries including fruit-
tree seedlings
Tree planting of fast growing indigenous tree
species using local labour
Ensure well-planned harvesting of trees e.g.
unconnected blocks
SPIU
MOF district
extension staff
DTOs
NGOs/CBOs
Basic training in
management and forests and
conservation of natural
habitats through short courses
and/or exchange visits
Training in business
management and
entrepreneurial skills through
short courses and/or
exchange visits
- 52 -
Promote the use of non-timber forestry products
(NTFPs – e.g. wild fruits, honey, mushrooms,
caterpillars)
Roads
Upgrading and
maintenance of
community feeder roads
in the Kafue Sub-basin
Rehabilitation of
community road
infrastructure (farm-to-
homestead) to climate
resilience standards
Increased pressure on natural
resources (land, water, forests) as a
result of influx of population due to
voluntary settlement along the
improved roads
Loss of natural vegetation near
roads/important habitats
Air pollution (increased dust) during
construction/ rehabilitation of roads
extraction of road construction
materials e.g. gravel from borrow-
pits
Disruption of water flow /blocked
drainage at culverts and bridges
Contamination through accidental
spillage of lubricants and fuels
Promote controlled settlement along improved
roads with assistance of traditional and local
authorities
Minimise clearing of vegetation
Institute erosion control measures especially at
culverts/bridges
Design roadside drainage control
(culverts/bridges that can handle anticipated
water flows
Ensuring culverts and bridges of correct size and
are installed at strategic points along the road
Ensure adequate and timely maintenance of
culverts and bridges
Put in place measures to prevent spilling of oils
and fuels and where feasible, recycle used oils.
SPIU
MOF district
extension staff
MTWSC
DTOs
NGOs/CBOs
Training in environmental
and natural resources
management in relation to
road construction
Sensitisation in basic
requirements of
environmental safeguard
policies and local legislation
Training in conflict resolution
Protection of local
infrastructure and assets
Climate proofing of local
community
infrastructure such as
community service
centres (markets, clinics,
schools etc)
No major environmental impacts are
anticipated from the sub projects
Strengthening of local planning processes,
participatory land use planning, development
planning, community planning of protected area
planning
Siting and construction of new buildings in areas
which are shielded from floods, storms and
strong wind
Construction of drainage/storm drains protect
fields from floods
Construction of gabions and other
stabilization/erosion prevention structures to
protect fields
Siting and construction of construction of ponds,
channels for water retention, storage and
directing running off
Dredging, ditching, construction of cut-off
channels direct water flow
SPIU
MOF district
extension staff
MTWSC
DTOs
NGOs/CBOs
Sensitisation campaigns on
environmental and natural
resources management
Training in environmental
protection and ecosystems
planning and management
Sensitisation in basic
requirements of
environmental safeguard
policies and local legislation
Enhanced Local capacities for
coping with Climate Change
Support to community
level climate adaptation
No major environmental impacts are
anticipated from the subprojects
Develop mechanisms’ for Climate vulnerability
and hazard mapping
Strengthening the level of community
organisations e.g. water users associations,
traditional structures
Development of climate information management
SPIU
MOF district
extension staff
ZMD
DTOs
NGOs/CBOs
Sensitisation and training in
climate information systems
change adaptation including
vulnerability and hazard
mapping
Sensitisation in basic
- 53 -
systems that tap into both modern and tradition
weather warning systems
Strengthening of local climate resilience
structures such as Satellite Disaster Management
Committees, Community, Water User
Associations, Village Development Committees,
Marketing Associations, Women Development
Groups, Youth Organizations
Strengthening of community level organisation
and governance
Strengthening of traditional institutions in climate
resilience
requirements of
environmental safeguard
policies and local legislation
- 54 -
Table 2: Environmental and Social Monitoring Plan
ISSUE METHOD OF MONITORING AREAS OF CONCERN POSITIVE INDICATOR FREQUENCY RESPONSIBLE
AUTHORITIES
Soils The Developer should make a daily inspection of earth works, and ensure that slopes are suitably graded. Once earthworks are complete the PCU should monitor the restoration measures implemented by the Contractor, such as re-vegetation
Soil erosion
Conservation activities
Rangelands management
an absence of rills, gullies or other erosion features occurs
Regularly and on-going as project is implemented
Department of Forestry
Vegetation The farmers must clear area to be used and site works only.
Clearing of the project site and disturbance of animals.
flora and fauna
No unnecessary vegetation cleared
Regularly and ongoing as project is implemented
Department of Forestry
Zambia Environmental Management Agency (ZEMA).
Animals
(Game corridors)
The farmers and the Environment Department staff should carry out regular inspections of the area and check that usual animal access routes are maintained.
Game corridors
Usual animal access routes are maintained /not disrupted. Reduced, human, animal conflict.
Regularly and on-going as project is implemented
Zambia Environmental Management Agency (ZEMA).
Zambia Wildlife Authority
Birds Interference with nesting sites Nesting sites
Migratory routes
Reproductive patterns of birds undisturbed
Regularly and ongoing as project is implemented
Zambia Environmental Management Agency (ZEMA).
Zambia Wildlife Authority
Small mammal habitat loss
Ensure that no unnecessary habitat loss occurs. Animal habitats No Mammal are displaced from their habitats.
Regularly and ongoing as project is implemented
Zambia Environmental Management Agency (ZEMA).
Zambia Wildlife Authority
Poaching Monitoring is the responsibility of the Zambia Wildlife Authority and the Police Departments.
Poaching Number of poaching incidences reduced or eliminated.
Regularly and ongoing as project is implemented
Zambia Environmental Management Agency (ZEMA).
Zambia Wildlife Authority
Police department
Crime The PCU should Liaise with police department if crime/theft becomes a problem.
Criminal activities in the area
Crime theft kept to a minimum. Incidences of stock theft and house breaking minimized.
Regularly and ongoing as project is implemented
Zambia Wildlife Authority
Police department
District Administrator
Noise Noise monitoring should be carried out on an ad-hoc basis by the Environmental Monitor or the PCU to establish noise levels in the work areas.
Noise Levels Noise levels at the nearest sensitive receiver would be kept to a minimum.
Regularly and ongoing as project is implemented.
Ministry Of Health
Zambia Environmental Management Agency (ZEMA).
Health The PCU must ensure that education and awareness campaigns are implemented. The Ministry of Health, local authority should carry out awareness campaigns on animal related diseases, water-borne diseases and carry out vector control methods such as regular spraying of potential breeding sites (ponds)
Public health
Ensure that stagnant water is sprayed to destroy mosquito larvae.
Waste management at Sub-project sites.
Disease outbreak due to concentration of people at the Sub-project sites.
Disease outbreak due to dust and water pollution.
Control and management of various animal
Reduction in number of cases of such diseases as Avian flu, foot and mouth, AIDS/STD related diseases recorded at hospital and medical clinic
Reduction in number of diseases such as cholera
Regularly and ongoing as project is implemented
Health ministry
Project PCU
SECRETARIAT
- 55 -
diseases
Archaeology Provision should be made to allow archaeologists to be present on site during the excavation periods if they so wish. The PCU should inspect all excavations, and where archaeological remains are found work must stop until the PCU has given the all clear to proceed. The PCU should contact the Museums Authorities in the event of a significant archaeological find.
Archaeological Findings
Archaeological remains not excavated, disturbed or destroyed.
Regularly and ongoing as project is implemented
Room for chance finds
National Heritage Conservation Commission
Energy The Developer must inspect the provisions made by the Contractor to supply energy to the workforce, and ensure that fuel wood is not being collected. The Environmental Department should enforce legislation which prohibits cutting down of trees. The Environmental Department, PCU and local leadership (cultural and political) should sensitize the workers against cutting down of trees.
Types of energy sources used in the project
Energy supplied by electric generator or other suitable source. Deforestation and resultant erosion controlled and reduced
Regularly Department of Forestry.
Zambia Environmental Management Agency (ZEMA).
Air Pollution Observations should be made on the level of dust generated during the Agricultural Activity implementation by the Environmental Monitor or PCU. Dampening should be carried out if levels are unacceptable.
Levels of dust emissions
Deposition of dust on surfaces should decrease with increased dampening
Regularly Health ministry
Project PCU
SECRETARIAT
Water resources Water resources should be managed well
The Ministry of Health should test borehole water quality in the area to ascertain the suitability for human consumption.
Watercourses and impoundments.
Surface water quality
Ground Water Quality
Recommended distances from watercourses.
Possible dam construction sites.
Water made available for environmental concerns.
Pollution of water resources monitored/detected early and remedial measures taken on time
Tests for water pollution to be done regularly
Health ministry
Project PCU
SECRETARIAT
Department of Water Development, (DWD)
Zambia Environmental Management Agency (ZEMA).
Landscape The PCU should make visual inspection of earth works to ensure that excessive excavation is not being carried out. Temporary screening may be appropriate in some cases.
Visual intrusions
Aesthetics
Landscape alteration reduced to a minimum
Monthly National Heritage Conservation Commission
Zambia Environmental Management Agency (ZEMA).
Complaints The PCU should inspect the record of complaints made by local residents, to be kept by the farmers, and should check that action is taken quickly and that the number of complaints do not rise significantly.
Complaints Number of complaints decreases.
Regularly Project PCU
SECRETARIAT
Zambia Environmental Management Agency (ZEMA).
Local governance MLGC to ensure the following
compliancy to designs
Employment opportunities and recruitment are transparent.
Allocation of land is overboard
Cultural values are respected.
Land management
Land allocations
Socio cultural issues
Local governance
Social Aspects,
Land rights
Disputes over land reduced
Cooperation of local leadership is secured
Locals employed in the projects
Regularly Ministry of Local Government
District Councils
Project PCU
SECRETARIAT
Agricultural Activities
Ensure that Agricultural Activities follow designs and recommendations given for proper agricultural practices.
Ensure overall management of the Programme.
Appropriate land use downstream is done and no pollution of crops from contaminated water from spillages occur.
Siting of works, plan Land degradation curbed
Program running smoothly
Regularly PCU
SECRETARIAT
- 56 -
Table 3: Total Cost for the ESMP (in U.S. dollars) and disbursement schedule
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Total
1. Training and Workshops 14,400 14,400 14,400 43,200
2. Site-specific ESMPs 30,000 30,000 60,000
3. Mitigation measures 42,000 42,000 42,000 42,000 42,000 210,000
4. Monitoring 10,000 23,793.75 23,793.75 23,793.75 23,793.75 105,175
5. Annual Audit 10,000 10,000 10,000 30,000
6. End-of Project Audit 10,000 10,000
Total 458,375
- 57 -
83. Social Analysis: Poverty rates have remained high in Zambia and recent statistics
indicate that about 60% of the population is still living below the poverty datum line. Other
social challenges include high levels of unemployment especially among the youth and rural
areas are characterised by high illiteracy rates, high incidence of HIV/AIDS, limited access to
infrastructure and services. In the education sector, rural\urban and feSecretariate\Secretariate
gaps in literacy continue to remain wide. Poor school infrastructure in rural areas affects
enrolment and completion rates. Unemployment especially among the youth has increased
from 22% in 2008 to 28% in 20104. The prevalence and incidence of HIV/AIDS is estimated
at 16% among adult ages 15 – 49. Although the epidemic is showing signs of stabilization in
urban areas, the rates continue to rise in some rural areas. The risk posed by HIV/AIDS
pandemic will be mitigated by awareness campaigns and incorporation of HIV/AIDS
messages in training. The project will use Secretariat’s HIV/AIDS extension tools in
disseminating HIV/AIDS prevention, treatment and care information for staff and farmers.
The project will also improve the nutritional status of affected rural households and
communities through consumption of meat and milk products which are rich in proteins.
84. The broader stakeholder participation and partnerships in project activities will
enhance social coherence and stability which are key ingredients for inclusive growth and
development. This will be achieved through improved access to employment opportunities
and decreasing social exclusion of certain groups (women and youth). The project will offer
opportunities for transfer of skills (value addition training and training of artisans) which
directly lead to a greater accumulation of human capital. The project will also contribute to
poverty reduction through the provision of income and better livelihoods to participating
communities.
85. Involuntary resettlement: There is no involuntary resettlement or land acquisition
envisioned within the implementation of the Project activities. The livestock service centres
will be constructed on sites identified by communities in agreement with the government.
4 Combined 2011-2015 Zambia Strategy Paper and Country Portfolio Performance Review, Afdb, January 2013.
- 58 -
86. Gender Analysis: Women in Zambia account for 51% of the total population. Women
are mainly involved in agriculture and micro-enterprise as well as household tasks while men
dominate the mining sector and small/medium/large enterprises. At least 78% of the women
are engaged in agriculture. Although agriculture remains the main opportunity for
employment and income for rural women, they continue to have limited access to credit,
extension services and markets. They are also affected by various factors such as high
incidence of HIV/AIDS, discrimination and marginalisation, poverty and gender inequality.
In the Project area, female headed households account for 78.4% while female headed
households account for 21.6% of agricultural households. Men own more livestock than
women. Over 80 percent of the rural population in Zambia depend on agriculture related
activities for their livelihood5. Agriculture is the main source of income and employment
especially for rural women. Rural women participate in both production and post-production
activities and constitute more than 50% of the total rural workforce6. The livestock subsector
is economically important in Zambia accounting for about 35% of total agricultural
production7
. The subsector generates employment and incomes for rural people and
contributes to crop production by supplying manure and draught power. In the project area,
men own more livestock than women. Cattle are predominantly owned by men and women
own small livestock (chicken, goats). Generally all household members are involved in
livestock production in one way or another. Livestock rearing (especially cattle) is the
domain for men and boys. Livestock meant for fattening at home are taken care of by women
and girls. Thus, the responsibility of labour for activities such as feeding, milking, health
care, processing and marketing differs between men and women.
88. Taking into account the gender differences between men and women in the project
area and the specific constraints that women face in the livestock sector, the gender
mainstreaming strategy in SCRIKA will focus on increasing access to project activities for
women as well as increasing their participation in project implementation, community
representation and decision making. The project will have the following specific
interventions.
89. Access to training and knowledge transfer: The project will offer training in climate
change adaptation technologies for both male and female farmers. The training will be based
on a thorough needs assessment to be conducted at the start of the project. Training will be
oriented towards the specific needs of both men and women depending on the different roles
they play in relation to climate change adaptation. SCRIKA will support gender sensitization
and awareness training of farmers and local community leaders. The training will assist to
increase gender awareness and develop capacities of women and men to address gender
inequality issues in livestock. Women will have at least 50% participation in mixed training
sessions.
5 Central Statistics Office (2006). Living Conditions Survey
6 Census, 2010.
7 Cited in SNV (2012). Feasibility Study on Domestic Biogas Programme in Zambia
- 59 -
90. SCRIKA will also encourage farmers’ cooperatives to include a larger quota for
women in decision making positions. The Project will support at least 50% involvement of
women in management of livestock infrastructures. The Project will support a youth and
women empowerment programme aimed at training women and youth in value addition skills
(such as skins/hides processing) and skills training to run Income Generating Activities
(IGAs). Women will comprise at least 50% of the envisaged beneficiaries of the programme.
The GRZ is implementing the Performance Enhancement Programme (PEP) aimed at
strengthening the capacity for gender mainstreaming within line Ministries. The Secretariat
and Provincial Gender Officers will support the Project activities.
91. Access to community based Infrastructure: To ensure that the community based
infrastructure will also be accessible to women, the project activities will be constructed on
sites identified by both men and women in agreement with GRZ officials. The infrastructure,
for example market centres and training facilities will be constructed to cater for both men
and women’s needs. The project will also support at least 30% involvement of women in the
management of infrastructure.
92. Women and Youth Empowerment: The project will support a youth and women
empowerment programme aimed at training women and youth in value addition skills (such
as leather processing) and skills training to run Income Generating Activities (IGAs). Women
will comprise at least 50% of the envisaged beneficiaries of the programme. The component
has significant potential in reducing poverty among women by increasing their access to new
employment opportunities and developing women as contributors to economic growth.
93. Project Impact Monitoring: The socio–economic impact of the project components on
women are increased household incomes, food security and well-being. The project will put
in place a monitoring and results tracking system to track the impact of the project on
women. Key indicators will include (i) availability of food for female headed households; (ii)
income for female headed households; (iii) number of women in group and community based
decision making bodies; (iv) changes in household and community perception of women and
their capabilities.
94. Alignment with National Development Plan: In the short term, the expected outcome
of the project is improved and equal access by both men and women to modern livestock
production and management techniques and to livestock infrastructure. The project outcome
is aligned with the gender specific agenda outlined in Zambia’s Sixth National Development
Plan (2011 – 2015). The Sixth National Development Plan (SNDP) entrenches gender as one
of the cross – cutting issues and prioritizes the need to mainstream gender in the development
process. The main objectives of the SNDP (as far as gender is concerned) are to develop
gender responsive policies and legal framework, to enhance capacity of women to participate
in national development and to strengthen institutional capacities for effective gender
mainstreaming. Specific gender mainstreaming activities include capacity building, gender
audit, gender analysis and legislative and policy reviews.
- 60 -
95. Key gender issues in Zambia: Key gender issues in Zambia relate to the feminization
of poverty, culture and tradition, the legal framework, participation in decision making and
HIV/AIDS. Poverty remains high in Zambia (affecting more than 60% of the population).
Women continue to be more vulnerable to severe consequences of poverty. Statistics show
that of the 68% of the population who are poor, 80% of these are women and children8.
Cultural and traditional practices systematically subject women to male domination and make
them dependent on men. Other factors that lead to gender inequality are lower education and
literacy level, patriarchal structures and stereotypes. The resulting gender disparities have
economic implications in that they lead to inequalities in access, ownership and control of
productive resources and of time and labour.
96. The legal framework is biased against women. Freedoms provided under the
constitution are undermined by customary and cultural factors. The dual legal system limits
women’s rights of access and control over productive resources. Women also continue to be
marginally represented at all levels of decision making. Low participation in decision making
has implications for women’s empowerment and poverty reduction. The incidence and
prevalence of HIV/AIDS continues to affect women more than men. There are gender
differences in impact where women shoulder the burden of caring for the sick, but both men
and women suffer the social and economic effects of the disease. Gender based violence has
continued to increase and it is both fuelled by and fuels the spread of HIV/AIDS9.
97. Policy and Institutional Framework for Gender Mainstreaming: The national Gender
Policy was launched in 2000. The policy recognizes the need for equal and full participation
of women and men at all levels of national development. The national gender policy outlines
priority areas for the agriculture sector and these include (i.) facilitating the strengthening of
the provision of agricultural services (credit, extension, research) to small holders particularly
women farmers, (ii) construction of rural infrastructure to assist small holder farmers
especially women to acquire inputs and market their produce on time, (iii) facilitating and
promoting research and dissemination of information on agriculture targeted at women, (iv)
facilitating the formation of women farmer groups so that they can benefit from agricultural
programmes, and (v) encouraging the development of agro-industries in rural areas where
most rural women live.
98. The Ministry of Gender and Child Development which was upgraded in 2012 from
the Gender in Development Division (GIID), is the lead national gender machinery. The
ministry is responsible for implementing, coordinating and evaluating the national gender
policy with a mandate to achieve gender responsive development. It works with Gender focal
points (GFPs) in line ministries in promoting gender issues in sectoral policies and
programme interventions. Within the NGO sector the Non-Governmental Organisation
Coordinating Council (NGOCC) plays a “watchdog” role in the ratification, implementation
of national, regional and international instruments on gender in the country10.
8 Cited in Paper on Gender Equality in Zambia presented by NGOCC during the Civil Society/Patriotic Front
Dialogue on 12 – 13 April, 2012 at Crest Golf View Hotel, Lusaka, Zambia. 9 World Bank 2004, Zambia Strategic Gender Assessment. 10
African Development Bank, 2006. Zambia multi-sector gender profile.
- 61 -
99. Gender Mainstreaming in SCRIKA: A document review of on-going and closed
projects implemented by Secretariat with regard to gender impact was carried out. The
project design has benefitted from the lessons learnt and these include; (i) a detailed
engendered log frame with a robust set of gender sensitive indicators is critical for monitoring
gender impact (ii) the need to promote gender friendly technologies in particular labour
saving technologies; (iii) empowerment programmes directed at women and youth for
example access to resources (e.g. credit, land, livestock, good quality seed) improve their
economic status. The lessons have been incorporated into the project design by (i) reviewing
and updating the SCRIKA log frame objectives performance indicators to accommodate
gender issues; (ii) promoting labour saving technologies for example biogas digesters and
also draught power which have the benefit of reducing workload for women; (iii)
incorporating a youth and women empowerment programme aimed at training women and
youth in value addition skills and skills training to run Income Generating Activities (IGAs).
100. Entry Points for Mainstreaming Gender in SCRIKA: The project will support gender
capacity building activities for SCRIKA stakeholders as shown in the table below.
Target Group Type of Training
Farmers & Community Leaders Gender awareness & sensitization.
Field & extension staff Gender awareness & sensitization. Gender mainstreaming.
SECRETARIAT technical staff & programming staff
Gender awareness & sensitization. Gender mainstreaming. Gender analysis tools and techniques.
SCRIKA Project staff & Implementing partners
Gender awareness & sensitization. Gender mainstreaming. Gender analysis tools and techniques. Gender based Monitoring, Evaluation and Reporting. Learning on the job with support from Gender Specialist.
101. Gender Audit Study: A gender audit study will be carried out (during the third year)
to assess the status and progress made in achieving gender equality within the project. The
study will identify achievements made, gender gaps, challenges and constraints in
mainstreaming gender in the project and also make recommendations of how the project can
improve on delivery during the remaining period.
102. Documentation and Dissemination of Gender Information: The project will work
closely with gender related organisations (NGOs, national institutions, donors) for purposes
of sharing information on gender and women’s empowerment in relation to livestock
development. The project will document and share learning material on women’s
empowerment and gender equality with all the relevant stakeholders at district and national
level. A stakeholder workshop will also be held to share lessons learnt and disseminate
information on gender. A budget for the proposed gender activities is shown in table below.
- 62 -
103. Women and Youth Empowerment: The Project will support a youth and women
empowerment programme aimed at training women and youth in value addition skills (skin
and hides processing). The Project will train 27 women and youth groups in hides and skin
tanning. This would involve soaking, de-haring, liming, fleshing (mechanical scrapping off
the excessive organic material) and splitting. The hides and skins are then pickled and tanned.
The tanned hides and skins are tradable as intermediate products (wet blue leather) or can be
further processed into leather which is used to manufacture consumer products (shoes, hand
bags e.tc). The women and youth groups will be able to sell tanned leather to footwear,
upholstery and garment manufacturers. The component has significant potential in reducing
poverty among women by increasing their access to new employment opportunities and
developing women as contributors to economic growth.
104. Project Gender Impact Monitoring: The project will put in place a monitoring and
results tracking system to track the impact of the project on women. Key indicators that will
be monitored and suggested data analysis and collection methods are shown in the Table
B.8.3.
Table B.8.3: Key Indicators to Track the Gender Impact of the Project
Indicator Data Collection Methods
Availability of food for female headed households Household Surveys
Change in income for female headed households Household Surveys
Number of women accessing livestock infrastructure and information Household Surveys Group Interviews
Number of women in group and community based decision making bodies;
Group and Community Interviews
Changes in household and community perception of women and their capabilities.
Perception and Attitude Surveys
105. Social Impact: The social impact of the project is expected to be positive. The project
will provide income and better livelihoods to participating communities. It is expected that
average annual income of farmers will increase overtime (by 2025 the average annual income
is projected to have increased by 97%). The project will help communities in the project area
to diversify agricultural output. Other positive effects will include an improvement in the
nutritional status of the population through consumption of meat and milk products rich in
proteins and supply of draught power for crop production.
106. Rehabilitated feeder roads leading to markets will facilitate sale of livestock and
related agro-products which will generally improve trade in the targeted provinces and
increased economic activity will significantly boost local development. Value addition
training will improve skills and give employment to women and youth. Other employment
opportunities will be created through the operation of the livestock service centres. The
anticipated economic well-being resulting from higher family incomes will generate positive
multiplier effects on social stability. The project will help curb rural exodus by retaining the
population especially the youth in the project target areas.
- 63 -
ANNEX C1 : DETAILED PROJECT DESCRIPTION
107. The development objective of the Strengthening Climate Resilience in the Kafue
Basin (SCRIKA) project is to strengthen the adaptive capacity of rural communities to better
respond to eh current climate variability and long-term consequence of climate change in eh
Kafue sub-basin. This will be achieved by piloting adaptive mechanisms in the agricultural
and natural resources management practices, as well as in rural infrastructure.
108. The Project introduces a new innovative approach to finance community based
adaptation interventions in selected climate-vulnerable areas by focusing on three areas of
intervention: (i) production systems emphasizing diversification and intensification in
agriculture and natural resources technological innovations at the community level; (2)
infrastructure development with a focus on applying design parameters and codes that
strengthen rural roads to withstand floods, and (3) institutional support and capacity building
focusing on institutional strengthening at both the national and local levels. The proposed
project consists of three components: (i) Community-Driven Participatory Adaptation, (ii)
Construction and Rehabilitation of Climate Resilient Roads, and (iii) Project Management
and Coordination. Since most adaptation interventions to date at the community level have
been very scattered and uncoordinated, the project will adopt a framework approach for
identifying scalable community sub-projects, using transparent criteria, to meet the objectives
of the Project
Component 1: Community-Driven Participatory Adaptation (US$ 18.5million grant)
109. The objective of this component is to strengthen the adaptive capacity of poor rural
communities and natural resources based production systems that are vulnerable to floods and
droughts in the Kafue sub-basin. It would support community based adaptation initiatives
which will be selected by communities through a demand-driven process facilitated by
qualified non-governmental organisations (NGOs) working in partnership with the local
government at the Ward, District and Provincial levels. Component 1 comprises two (2) sub-
components.
110. Sub-component 1.1: Integrated Community-Based Adaptation (US$ 16 million
grant) will support three (3) areas of intervention:
1.1.1 Community-level Infrastructure Projects. This sub-component will support the
upgrading of community-owned infrastructure to withstand severe floods or droughts, while
opening up opportunities that will stimulate entrepreneurship and bolster income generating
activities for the beneficiary communities. Such activities will include micro-projects for
flood control and diversion structures, small-scale irrigation schemes, small-scale water
reservoirs, small-scale dams, feeder roads and culverts, de-silting and restocking ponds and
water bodies, improved wells and boreholes, reforestation and afforestation of community
forest plantations, wildlife estates and communal game ranches. The civil works for the
micro-projects will be financed either through contractors or through labour provided by
communities. A typical cost of a community-level infrastructure project will be
approximately US$100,000.
1.1.2 Farm-Level Support Systems: This sub-component will support farm level initiatives.
Beneficiaries of the support will be identified through a system of wealth ranking that will
target the most poor, vulnerable farmers, majority of whom will be youth and women.
- 64 -
Activities under this sub-component will include training farmers on conservation
agriculture, management of soil moisture and fertility, inputs such as seeds for drought and
flood resistant crop varieties for crop diversification, seedlings for fruit orchards, livestock
and fisheries for diversification of farming systems, erosion control and improved grazing
and pastures as well as value addition investments. The participating NGOs together with
communities will produce plans that itemise the quantities of each of the support systems and
the number of beneficiaries required. An Input Voucher valued at US$ 400 - 500 will be
provided to selected farmers.
1.1.3 Matching Grant for Climate Change Adaptation Investments: The Project will support
medium to large-scale investments in activities that are considered to add value to primary
products supplied by local producers, and which will increase climate change resilience along
the value chain of agri-business. Entrepreneurs who have a viable business plan and secure
equity finance, loans or grants from government or financing institutions for climate change
related adaptation investments will be eligible for a matching grant of up to 25 percent of the
investment or a ceiling value of US$30,000 per investment. Such investments will target
communities that would benefit from value addition activities focusing on agro-processing,
game ranching, aquaculture fingerling production, eco-tourism, honey processing, biogas
plants, and wildlife management.
111. Sub-component 1.2: Support to Integrated Community Based Adaptation (US$ 2.5
million grant). This sub-component will support the local government and community
groups in each district to incorporate climate risk management principals into local area
development planning (sub-component 1.1) and in selecting adaptation initiatives that will
build climate resilience at the community level. Support will be provided to local non-
governmental organizations to mobilise, train and facilitate communities in risk and
vulnerability assessment at the district in integrating climate risk management principals in
local area planning. The sub-component will also support the work of Area Development
Committees in mobilising and creating awareness among local communities and in
supervising or backstopping the implementation of the micro-projects.
112. This component will be aimed at climate proofing Local Area and District
Development Plans in the nine (9) districts. The activities to be included in the Plans for
project support will be based on addressing additional stresses caused by climate change and
variability, such as floods and droughts. Support will be provided to local government,
community groups and farmers in each district to identify and thereafter incorporate climate
vulnerability and risks into local area development plans and to ensure that community-level
and farm-level projects are climate resilient. This will be done through a systematic
livelihood vulnerability and risk assessment, undertaken at community level, in which each
social group will have its specific input. Climate related risks to livelihoods, production
systems and to natural resources will be identified. Response options will be developed and
designed for each group and for each production line. The relevance of plans and investments
to climate risks will be ensured through this process. For this purpose, support will be
provided to mobilize, facilitate and train communities and local government officials in
undertaking vulnerability and risk assessments and in integrating climate risks into
development plans as well as into the design of community and farm level investments. In
order to benefit from the latest knowledge and experience in climate change adaptation, the
project will be able to call upon expertise from civil society, academia and research
organizations.
- 65 -
113. Building capacity of government staff at district and community levels in participatory
diagnosis, planning and implementation of adaptation projects at community level will be
critical. Two measures will be undertaken: Establish a five member Project Implementation
Team (PIT) drawing on members of the District Development Coordinating Committee
(DDCC) and whose team leader will be the District Planner in each of the nine (9) districts.
Membership shall include line ministries responsible for agriculture and natural resources
management. The PIT is designed for long term sustainability and to ensure that the project
activities are integrated and mainstreamed within public sector plans and finances. The PIT
will be supported with training in climate change adaptation skills, and equipped with basic
facilities such as motorbikes, computers, and operational funds. The PIT will primarily
ensure that community plans are financed and that public sector plans (Local Area
Development Plans) incorporate community adaptation plans. They will receive, evaluate and
recommend climate adaptation activities from communities for top-up financing through the
project. The PIT will also participate in the participatory community mobilization, training
and planning activities (which will be carried out by the qualified NGOs. They will monitor
the project by receiving reports from the participating NGO on project activities.
114. Engaging a participating NGO in each district to mobilize, train and facilitate
communities in risk and vulnerability assessment, developing community plans and applying
for financing from the district and project development funds will be supported by the
Project. The NGO will work with the PIT at each district in the selected vulnerable wards
and communities in mobilizing and in selecting adaptation measures for inclusion in the
Local Area Development Plans (LADP). The NGO will further support the detailed design,
costing and implementation of the LADPs at all times in close cooperation with community
level government staff. The NGO will facilitate identification of beneficiary households to
benefit from the various services of the project. The NGO will establish a team of staff
comprising at the minimum of a Team Leader, a Community Development Specialist,
Agriculturalist, and Natural Resources Management Specialist. These shall be well versed
and exposed to climate change adaptation and shall be trained in submitting lessons learnt
and M&E reports to the PIT. These reports shall be tabled at each meeting of the DDCC,
consolidated by the PIT and submitted to the Climate Change Secretariat through the M&E
officer.
115. Vulnerability and Risk Assessment (VRA): This entails identifying vulnerable groups
and high priority adaption measures best suited to overcoming limiting factors in terms of
improving livelihoods and protecting the natural resource base. The PIT shall identify the 3
most vulnerable wards and communities and participatory tools shall be applied to conduct a
vulnerability and risk assessments in each targeted district, wards and communities. The
studies will provide detailed information on climate related vulnerabilities and risks and their
impact on livelihoods for all social groups in communities, and in order of priority for each
group to enable adaptation measures to be targeted for maximum impact. The studies will
help developing the LADPs provide will underpin the selection of adaptation initiatives. It
will be important to distinguish between climate related risks and risks related to other causes
in order to ensure that investment funds are disbursed as per the development objective of the
project. In order to facilitate this task, a Technical Assistant (TA) consultant on VRA will be
engaged for a period of three months during the first year to help each district PIT and NGO
staff.
116. Monitoring and Evaluation – Knowledge generation, Up-scaling ad Sustainability: A
Monitoring and Evaluation expert shall be placed in the Climate Change Secretariat. The
- 66 -
M&E expert will work closely with each district PIT with the District Planner as focal point
to design an M&E and lessons learnt compilation system. The information collected from the
NGO implementation team shall form the primary basis for the M&E system. The M&E
system will monitor the process and outcome indicators, baselines and targets set for each
component of the project based on the Logframe developed. In order to track progress of
adaptation initiatives, the monitoring tools shall be defined and embedded in the planning and
project application protocol (form) specifying the objective, inputs, outputs and expected
outcomes. The M&E protocols will be used to undertake structured discussions with those
involved with the initiatives to spot unforeseen problems and agree on remedial actions. The
information from the monitoring protocol shall form the basis for quarterly and annual
reports. A mid-term evaluation will be undertaken halfway during the life of the project and
at completion of the project.
117. This being a pilot project, it is vital that learning is documented and that sharing of
experiences is a continuous process during implementation. The communities, NGO and PIT
staff shall be supported with exchange and exposure visits to successful projects to learn from
peers’ new ways of doing things. The project shall also call in knowledgeable experts from
other NGOs, private companies, research organizations, academia and the CGIAR system. A
key condition for sustainability and up-scaling is that the new adaptation initiatives are
economically and technically viable for their intended target groups. As part of building a
package of sustainable and scalable adaptation measures, successful initiatives will be
documented and made available to other actors engaged in climate change adaptation in
Zambia and beyond. The conditions for access will be made clear such as, for example access
to markets for new produce. The NGO, in cooperation with the PIU and government staff
will be responsible for this knowledge product. An amount will be allocated to be able to
engage experienced writers and media people for this purpose.
118. Eligibility Criteria: In order to ensure that project funds will be used for initiatives
related exclusively to climate change adaptation, building resilience and disaster risk
reduction, screening will be undertaken against the following criteria. An initiative will be
eligible to the extent that it:
reduces the risk, exposure or sensitivity of human or natural systems to climate
variability and change,
increases the potential or capacity of a system to adapt to effects and impact of
climate stimuli,
builds problem solving capacity to develop responses to climate variability and
change,
incorporates climate hazard risk information into decision-making, and/or
addresses impacts exclusively linked to climate variability and change,
The proposed adaptation sub-projects should demonstrate clear adaptation co-
benefits11
and not contribute potentially to mal-adaptation (e.g. have short-term
benefits, but increase vulnerability over the long-term).
The activity should have been identified as a priority in the process of participatory
planning (at the community/group level), or Local Area/Integrated Development
11
By (a) directly diminishing impacts of climate change and variability on the beneficiaries and their assets, (b) building the beneficiaries’
capacity for response to climate change (resilience), (c) incorporate climate risk information into decision-making, or (d)
reinforcing/enhancing the capacity of an ecosystem to adapt to the impacts of climate change.
- 67 -
Planning process at the district level). Sub-grants to support climate resilient planning
(planning that takes into consideration climate risks such as drought and floods).
The proposed sub-projects must be screened for potential social and environmental
impacts (and must not require a full-scale Environmental and Social Impact
Assessment (i.e. sub-projects of Category “1” would be ineligible).
A minimum beneficiary contribution of 10 percent (for soft adaptation) or 15 percent
(for structural adaptation) is required. The contribution could be in-kind (this would
apply to group grants only)
The participatory plans should follow the process specified in the Operational
Manual, and should identify the most vulnerable groups or households
Community/group level sub-grant should be earmarked for women-headed
households, or female-headed households meeting the criteria of highly vulnerable to
extremely vulnerable groups or households.
The proposing institution – District Councils, Local Area Committee, or community
groups – should meet the minimum fiduciary criteria (as specified in the Operational
Manual)
District and ward-level adaptation should be geared at reducing the vulnerability of
existing assets. Financing of new social or productive infrastructure would be
ineligible unless designed to specifically reduce exposure or vulnerability of an
existing asset (e.g. elevation and/or displacement of structure to higher grounds)
Typology of Indicative Sub-Projects
Type of grant Likely exposure and climate impact Sub-projects
Community/group soft adaptation Increased incidence of floods, more intense floods, erratic rainfall, increases temperature, reduced soil moisture and/or seasonal droughts
Projected changes in climate – mean increased temperature, decreased precipitation and extreme (along the lines above) impacting agricultural production and livelihoods
Agriculture and livestock practices:
Introducing/scaling up conservation tillage and soil moisture retention – improved management of soil moisture through the use of mulch/organic matter and conservation of soil organic matter
Diversifying agricultural practice such as crops/varieties grown including drought tolerant or grown under water-logged conditions or staggering time of planting
Changing times for applying agriculture inputs to take advantage of available moisture and rainfall
Diversifying livestock production (animals raised0 and agro-forestry and/or integration of crops and livestock (e.g. goats, sheep) in a mixed farming system
Diversifying livelihoods opportunities into sustainable activities that are not climate sensitive, and/or moving them to less climate sensitive locations (such as bee-keeping, crafts using local, non-timber material, agro-processing, and aquaculture
Accessing improved weather (flood, drought, frost) early warning system
Access to agricultural insurance system using measurements of local rainfall/flood measures for pay-off at appropriate area level and monetary
Community preparedness support
Community/group small-scale infrastructure
Change in mean and extremes both in frequency and duration
Infrastructure initiatives for water management to reduce effects of flooding
Construction/rehabilitation of wells and boreholes for water access during unseasonal droughts
Rehabilitate and/or manage canals to improve drainage and/or store water to overcome shorter
- 68 -
growing seasons and allow early planting and full maturation
Strengthen or raise mounds/paths/bridges used to cross flood plains around the community areas during unusually long floods
Floating platforms for evacuation of people/livestock
District/ward Changes in mean and extremes both in frequency and duration
Meeting places or field days to support knowledge on diversification of agriculture and livestock-based livelihoods
Facilitate links with micro-finance institutions/tools to support livelihoods and livestock diversification
Facilitate/equip local livestock para-vet centers for vaccination and disease control
Component 2: Construction and Rehabilitation of Climate Resilient Roads (US$
17.5million loan)
119. The objective of this component is to strengthen the climate resilience of rural roads
that link farmers to markets as well as to the Kafue National Park for a total of 251.25km in
the Kafue sub-basin to be able to withstand floods. The roads include, (i) Kalomo to
Dundumwezi (75.25km); and (ii) Itezhi-Tezhi to Namwala (52km). The project roads are
minor arterial roads, connecting local centres of population. The majority of the vehicles will
be passenger, tourist and ZAWA vehicles, and the horizontal alignment of the road is such
that a perceived safe driving speed of 60-70 km/h can be adopted. It is therefore
recommended that a Type III cross-section be employed comprising 2x2.75m carriageway
and 2x0.5 m shoulders.
120. The design standards comprise; (i) provision of cement stabilized fill of approach
gravel wearing course and over drainage structures shaped to provide good flow
characteristics in invents of overtopping; (ii) erosion protection of side slopes of approach
fills and pavement layers; and (iii) tree planting of selected areas in the catchment basin; (iv)
5percent camber to ensure that rain-water is drained speedily to avoid saturating the wearing
gravel layer; provision of side drains on either side of the carriageway in cut conditions;
cement stabilized against scour where gradients dictate; and (v) limiting side slopes to a
minimum of 1:5 reduce runoff velocities.
121. Introduction: The component is meant to strengthen the capability of the roads to
withstand extreme climate events, mainly floods in the Kafue basin of a total of 127km of
farm-to-market access roads in the Kafue Basin. The project roads comprise, (i) Kalomo to
Dundumwezi (75km); and (ii) Ngoma-Itezhi-Tezhi-Namwala (81km). The roads traverse the
southern and central parts of Zambia. Kalomo is located in Southern Province along the T1,
approximately 126km from Livingstone. The D344 starts at Kalomo and follows a
northwesterly route to the junction of the D714. This stretch is within Kalomo district and is
18.2km in length. The D714 starts at the junction with the D344 and continues its
northwesterly and westerly route to Dundumwezi, which is the southern entrance to the
Kafue National Park (KNP). The length of this section to Dundumwezi is 55.4km. KNP
covers portions of Southern, Central and Northwestern provinces, with a total area of
22,400km². The alignment connects Dundumwezi with Ngoma, some 95km to the north.
From Ngoma, the U1 connects to Itezhi-tezhi a distance of just over 20km. Between Itezhi-
tezhi and Kacheleko, the D769 extends some 108.2km in length, through the Itezhi-tezhi and
Mumbwa districts. The project roads are within the Kafue River Basin and are subjected to
wash-aways and flooding during the rainy season.
- 69 -
Kalomo – Dundumwezi Road
122. Alignments: That starts at Kalomo and branches off into 714. The total length is
18.2km, traversing rolling terrain with gentle gradients. Within Kalomo a 250m section is
surfaced with a carriageway width of 6.1m and an approximate formation width of 9m.
Thereafter the road is partially in a sunken state, with a carriageway width varying from 5.5m
to 7m, with literally no gravel on it as it seemingly has been eroded over time.
123. The length of D714 is 57.05km. The existing carriageway width varies between 4.5m
and 6m. The formation width varies between 8m and 9m. The riding quality for both
D344/D714 was observed to range from poor to very poor. The comfortable riding speed
averages no more than 20km/h due to the worsening conditions during the rainy season.
Information obtained is that the road was re-gravelled approximately 10 years ago and
consequently because of the climatic action and traffic the gravel has completely been
completely lost. The poor condition of the riding surface leads the traffic to avoid the middle
of the road and to drive on the verges and side drains. As such side drains have been lost due
to traffic riding on the verges and drains with the exception of approaches to drifts/culverts.
124. Drainage and Construction Materials: There are 25 existing drainage structures and 2
bridges on D344. The two bridges, at Sichikwenkwe River and Kalomo River, are in the first
9.5km stretch. The Sichikwenkwe Bridge at km 1+750 is a single lane three-span steel
trussed bridge supported on concrete piers and abutments. Some of the truss members have
been damaged and the deck and its approaches were in a deplorable condition. Some
maintenance of the trusses will be required as is the cleaning of expansion joints and the
reconstruction of the deck. The Kalomo Bridge at km 7+590 is a 7-span concrete beam and
slab structure, with no handrails. Erection of the handrails and some maintenance of the joints
and clearing of debris will be necessary.
125. There are approximately 80 existing drainage structures on D714, three of which are
vented pipe drifts at km 44 and km 67. The majority of drainage structures are 600 and
900mm diameter pipes. It was difficult to measure the structure at approximately km 44.1 as
it was submerged and, hence, posing a risk to the travelling public. The three drifts are in
unsound condition and will require appropriate interventions. One drift has bad approaches
and a partially eroded deck, threatening to collapse, and the other has an unsound deck with
one-half badly eroded. There are noticeable inadequacies in the condition of most of the
existing culverts such that some measure of interventions will need to be carried out.
Associated works, such as rechanneling and cleaning the channels will also be necessary.
126. Approximately 10 possible borrow areas for construction materials were noted along
the link. It would be appropriate to investigate the areas in the vicinity of old borrow areas
that were used, and later reinstated, a decade ago during the improvement of this link. As one
gets further away from Kalomo and the two rivers in the first 9.5km stretch, water for road
works will pose a challenge during the dry season, as most streams are seasonal. It will be
necessary to consider construction of a few dams at strategic stream locations.
Itezhi Tezhi – Namwala (RD367)
127. Alignment: The start point of the road is after the ZESCO control barrier running to
Namwala, a distance of 56km. There was an Output and Performance-Based Road Contract
(OPRC) on this road up to approximately km35 (from 2006 to 2010). The 26km distance had
- 70 -
received full gravel and the remaining length to km 35 being earth formed only. The
geometry on this stretch is very good.
128. The road traverses the flat terrain of the Kafue River flood plain with alluvial silty
sandy soils. The carriageway width approximates 5.5m on a slightly raised formation
constructed to Class II standard. Side drains, where available, are shallow such that running
water fills up and cuts overtops the road. For the first 6km the gravel layer has been eroded in
places. Between km6 and km20, there are sections still with full layers of gravel. Between
Km20 and km26 is badly eroded. The next 9km up to km35 features some gravel loss due to
rain. From km35 the road follows a waterlogged track towards the river.
129. Drainage and Construction Materials: There are 24 concrete pipe culverts and one
box culvert believed to have been constructed under the OPRC contract. With an exception of
a few of the structures, most appear to be efficiently discharging the storm-water. The
defective ones will need rehabilitation works. From km35 to the river, a series of culverts will
need to be constructed to cater for the flooding of the flat plain. In addition to constructing a
series of culverts through the flood plain, consideration should be given to provide raised
embankments to some sections of the road from Km0 to Km35 and most of the road from
km35 onwards if this road is to be in service throughout the year.
130. There is scarcity of construction materials as one gets further away from the gravel
sources within Itezhi-tezhi, and the resultant haul distance should be noted. Proper side drains
and outfalls will be required for the road. Even though the road traverses the flood plain,
water for the road-works will be a challenge.
Design Standards:
131. Geometric Standards: Functionally, the project roads are minor arterial roads,
connecting local centres of population. The majority of the vehicles will be passenger, tourist
and ZAWA vehicles, and the horizontal alignment of the road is such that a perceived safe
driving speed of 60-70 km/h can be adopted. It is therefore recommended that a Type III
cross-section be employed comprising 2x2.75m carriageway with no shoulders. A cross fall
of 5% will be utilized.
132. Hydraulic Standards: Precipitation variation in the project area is expected to range
between -3% to +3% by 2100 resulting in increases in flow in the Kafue River area by 11%
according to the IFC study. The storm-water capacities of the drainage structures have
therefore been increased by 15%. Additional measures to enhance the resilience of the roads
is to; (i) provide cement stabilized fill for the approach gravel wearing course and over
drainage structures shaped to provide good flow characteristics in invents of overtopping; (ii)
erosion protect the side slopes of approach fills and pavement layers; (iii) tree planting in
selected areas of the catchment basins; (iv) provide 5% camber to ensure that rain-water is
drained speedily to avoid saturating the wearing gravel course; (v) provide side drains will on
either side of the carriageway in cut conditions; cement stabilized for protection against scour
where gradients dictate; (vi) limit in fill conditions side slopes to a maximum of 1:5 reduce
runoff velocities.
133. The implementation for roads will comprise two parts; (i) civil works entirely financed
by the Bank; and (ii) a five (5) year maintenance period based on an Output and
Performance-Based Road Contract (OPRC) entirely financed by Government.
- 71 -
134. Executing Agency: The Road Development Agency (RDA) will be the executing
agency for the road-works and consulting services for supervision. The entity is currently
implementing two transport sector projects and therefore has the requisite expertise to
implement the project. The entity will assign a roads coordinator (RC) for close follow up
and timely response to correspondence forwarded from the consultant and contractor. The RC
for the works and services will be a civil engineer with a minimum of47 years’ experience in
road project management. The RC will prepare and forward quarterly reports to the Bank.
The PC will attend all site meetings, follow day to day operations including disbursement
requests and participate in the preparation of the joint Project Completion Report within six
(6) months after 98% disbursement rate. The RDA has assigned an RC with the requisite
qualifications and experience whose Curriculum Vitae (CV) has been reviewed and found
acceptable for the task. The civil works and day to day activities on site will be supervised
and monitored by an experienced consulting firm. The supervision consultant in conjunction
with RDA Environmental Safety Section will supervise and monitor implementation of the
environment and social management plans.
135. Sustainability: In 2002 the government created three road sector Agencies by Acts of
Parliament namely; (i) the National Road Fund Agency (NRFA) Act 13 of 2002; (ii) the
Road Development Agency (RDA) Act No. 12 of 2002; and (iii) the Road Transport and
Safety Agency (RTSA) Act No. 11 of 2002. The reforms in the roads sub-sector have given
the Road Development Agency (RDA) the a mandate to manage the core road network and
the National Road Fund Agency (NRFA) to raise, manage and disburse funds for the
management of the network. The Road Transport and Safety Agency (RTSA), oversees road
safety issues. The road sections referred to herein are part of the designated road network and
therefore fall within the responsibility of RDA for maintenance. Their sustainability therefore
will depend primarily on the ability of RDA and the NRFA to plan, program, finance and
implement timely maintenance of the road sections. ROADSIP II being reviewed to cover the
next five years includes planning, programming, and implementation of road maintenance in
Zambia. A Road Fund (RF) has been established and ring-fenced financing to secure a stable
flow of funds for road maintenance. Revenues collected are being fully remitted to the sector
for maintenance purposes.
136. The establishment of the Road Fund has been complimented by gradually increasing
the role of the private sector in routine road maintenance that will ensure sustainability of the
core road network. The private sector is currently involved in routine maintenance activities
through Performance Based Maintenance (PBM) contracts. Presently, 4500km is covered by
PBM contracts. Besides sustainability the PBM contracts are contributing to the development
of a strong domestic contracting industry over time.
137. Total domestic resources made available for the road sector increased from USD154.6
million in 2006 to USD420.60 million in 2012. Over the same period, Road Fund receipts
increased from USD43.20 million to USD121.40 million. The Road Fund can sufficiently
cover the cost of routine maintenance of the core road network. The availability of
maintenance financing, the design standards used for climate resilience will minimize effects
of flood waters and therefore reduce the costs associated with emergency interventions. The
Output Performance Based Contract for maintenance over a five year period will ensure that
the roads are passable thought the year. It is estimated that the annual maintenance cost per
km will be reduced by 50% through use of a performance based contract. The resilience
design and the performance-based maintenance contract adopted will therefore offer
- 72 -
significant advantages with regards to cost and ensuring all year round access by the
communities within the zone of influence.
138. Monitoring: The RDA has assigned a project coordinator with the requisite
qualifications and experience that will monitor the implementation of the works. The day to
day activities of the civil works including oversight of the implementation of the mitigation
measures to mitigate the environmental negative effects will be monitored by a supervision
consulting team. Monthly and quarterly reports will be submitted to the Bank and will
include physical, financial, social and environmental indicators that the project has achieved.
The reports will provide updated information on project implementation highlighting key
issues and problem areas and recommended measures for resolving identified bottlenecks. At
least two field missions will be undertaken annually to the sites to monitor progress. At 85%
completion of the project components or 95% disbursement of the loan funds, the Bank and
the Executing Agency will prepare a joint Project Completion Report.
Risk Management
139. Sustainability: There is a risk that there is insufficient financing to adequately cover
routine and periodic maintenance of the two road sections herein. The risk is mitigated by the
utilization of an Output and Performance Based Contract (ORPC) for maintenance with
funding from a Road Fund dedicated to road maintenance.
Cost Estimates for Roads
135. The project cost estimates has been sub-divided into two parts, namely the cost for;
(ii) the rehabilitation and upgrading works; and (ii) the maintenance under the Output and
Performance-Based Contract (ORPC). The cost for rehabilitation and upgrading of the two
road sections measuring 156km amounts to ZMW102.1 billion or USD19.19 million. The
maintenance costs over a five-year performance-based contract amounts to ZMW66.44
billion or USD12.49 million. The total cost of the project is ZMW168.54 billion or
USD31.68 million.
Table 1: Road Works (Part I)
Description Lot A: Kalomo to Dundumwezi (75km)
Lot B: Ngoma to Itezhi-tezhi to Namwala (81km)
ZMW billion USD million ZMW billion USD million
Consulting Services
Supervision 1.88 0.35 2.03 0.38
Preliminary and General Items
8.10 1.51 8.75 1.64
Drainage 25.20 4.74 27.22 5.12
Earthworks (including gravelling)
9.00 1.69 9.72 1.83
Road Furniture 0.45 0.08 0.49 0.09
Total Works 44.63 8.38 48.12 9.06
Contingency 10% 4.46 0.84 4.81 0.91
GRAND TOTAL 49.09 9.22 53.02 9.97
- 73 -
Table 2: Five Year Maintenance (Part II)
Description Lot A: Kalomo to Dundumwezi (75km
Lot B: Ngoma to Itezhi-tezhi to Namwala (81km)
ZMW billion USD million ZMW billion USD million
Consulting Services
Supervision 0.13 0.03 0.14 0.03
ORPC Maintenance Contract
4.28 0.80 4.61 0.87
Total Maintenance 4.41 0.83 4.75 0.90
Contingency 10% 0.44 0.08 0.48 0.09
GRAND TOTAL 4.85 0.91 5.23 0.99
1UA=1.50396USD=8.00274ZMW
Component 3: Project Management and Coordination (US$ 2 million grant)
136. This component will support project coordination function of the Secretariat to
oversee project implementation.