Phenomenology of pi

The universe has habits, not laws, and habits can be broken…

The composition of all things; even and especially that which is unseen, is energy by the

very nature of its created-ness. The following mathematics/philosophy/physics paper will

describe the basic processes of accurate measure in tetrahedral shapes, three to be precise. This

process is important because it illustrates the inner dynamics of measure with regard to ALL

shapes based on their most simple “origin” [180 line] and always and already as a “finished”

process [360 circle].

The first aspect of knowledge that is important is to understand that all shapes are the same

but not identical to their origin: 180 parts- line. Which means simply, that line of 180 is the

same but not identical as a circle 360. This due to the basic nature that all circles (and any other

shape) are always and already composed of 180-line from their origin. With this knowledge in

hand, precise analysis and measure can be done on any structure.

The processes of the following paper understand all shapes as fluid in nature, and with that

measure, find any shape's perimeter to attain that shape's circumference within .00035 parts of

traditional pi.

In keeping with that process, measures a single line, multiplied by (4) to construct a square

where by covering an area with a square in order to formulate the circle and circumference of

that space.

The most important factor in this papers' processes is that measure is based on a perfect

construction of three tetrahedra. This papers' process construct is based on 3.33 and understands

pi and phi as rational concepts, and that both concepts, pi and phi, are currently not as accurate as

they could be with regard to scientific study and mathematics. The considerations, for the

concepts of this paper in application, are to replace conventional pi.

V

V (ב Veit) Applied To Triangles

The basis for all mathematics falls first under philosophical processes and NOT under

mathematics. The following introduction to this paper is to illustrate what pi is and how it was

formed and to show how Veit (a new concept in this paper) “works” in accord with the processes

of pi. The following mathematical breakdown was done to ensure that proofing processes would

be understandable with regard to how pi compares to Veit.

1 P = 4

1 1.4142146247

The above square is a perimeter 4 square. The diagonal is found:

1(1.4142146247) = 1.414214247, typically this number is understood in this paper as Hyp or

“hypotenuse finding number” (the line between the two triangles that compose the square).

The parts percentage is found: (Parts-percentage also is a delineation of the author in order to

describe the thought processes of how shapes are understood by the author. That all shapes are

composed of parts, degrees, and percentages, all of which are interchangeable. Another different

example of the author’s theoretical processes is; that all shapes are fluid and not static.)

The diagonal divided by the perimeter yields the basic parts-percentage of all squares, just over

35%.

For example: 1.4142146247/4= .353553656175

𝜋d is found on the basic parts-percentage of the basic square and shows us that pi is

foundationally based on 3.33. Diameter is always 1/3 of circumference, therefore,

3.141592653(.353553656175) = 1.11072… or 1/3 of 3.33… The writers of pi knew that the

diagonal measured solidly and they also must have known that one third of the circumference

was to be 1.11 or 1/3 of 3.33 on the whole (which was their starting point). They knew this

perhaps from “old lost knowledge”. They understood that the diagonal is too short, however, to

accommodate the equation to be 3(.353553656175) = 1.060660968525(3) = 3.181982905575

NOT equal to 3.33 the final goal; therefore the 3.141592653…enigma was adopted as that which

was “closest” to facilitate the best approximation to 1/3 of 3.33.

Finding the diagonal of a square with “parts-percentage” processes:

The following square is a 16 perimeter square, and the illustration will show how the “parts-

percentage” processes of .353553656175 can find the diagonal of the square.

The perimeter multiplied by the “parts-percentage” number (.353553656175) is used to equate

the diameter.

16 (.353553656175) = 5.6568584988

D= 5.6568584988

4

4 5.6568584988

𝜋𝑑 is: 3.141592653(5.6568584988) = 17.771545098891

C= 17.771545098891

The term circumference will be used for pi equations and tricumference is the term for

surrounding circle around Veit equations.

The next section will illustrate how Veit was found and how it works compared to “pi

processes”. The processes of sequencing are essential to this paper. The following number

.37037 was found using sequencing on the “long-form” process. That process will be illustrated

below.

1.11/3 = .37

1.111/3 = .37033333repeating

1.1111/3 = .37036666r

1.11111/3 = .37037 The number use to replace .353553656175…

1.111111/3 = .370370333333r

And…

.37037(3) = 1.11111 (five places only)

.37037(6) = 2.22222

.37037(9) = 3.33333

Veit circle in a square:

4 P = 16

4

This above 16 perimeter square is how a Veit circle looks. Notice that the diameter is no longer

diagonal, rather, it is identical to side.

Pi vs Veit comparison:

3.141592653(.353553656175) = 1.11072…

3(.37037) = 1.11111

4(.353553656175) = 1.4142146247….

4(.37037) = 1.48148

The number 1.48148 is the new hypotenuse finding number.

Pi breakdown vs Veit comparison, continued:

Pi Side Hyp

3.141592653 4 1.4142146247 = 17.771545098891…

Veit Diameter/Side Hyp

3 4 1.48148 = 17.77776 (Rational)

Compare pi and Veit difference

17.77776

-17.771545098891

.006214901109/17.77776 = .00035 parts-percentage difference from pi.

ALSO, another way to illustrate the same equation:

16(1.11111) = 17.77776 Therefore ANY perimeter multiplied by 1.11111 will yield a

tricumference to within .00035 parts of traditional pi.

Hyp on 16 perimeter “long-form” multiplied by 3 illustrates that diameter is 1/3 of the

tricumference: 5.92592(3) = 17.77776

And another way to equate tricumference:

Calculate ½ perimeter and then divide by .45. For example 16 perimeter/2 = 8/.45= 17.77777r

The above processes allow for ANY shape/perimeter to be measured. The basic idea is to equate

all shapes as the same but not identical to 180-line or 360-circle. All shapes are equivalent to

180-line and 360-circle, because first and foremost all shapes begin first as line.

The original form of this process is Veit “long-form” in the following illustration: *Long-

Form was the initial formula composed first by the author in order to find all aspects of Veit. The

author understands the square as a 5 sided “square” with regard to the hypotenuse in the center of

the square.

P [perimeter]= 16

Hyp [hypotenuse finding number] = 16(.37037) =

Hyp= 5.92592

Z= [divided square] 5.92592+16 =

Z= 21.92592(.45) =

D= [diameter shape] 9.866664

D= 9.866664(2) =

W= [whole circle] 19.733328 =

W=19.733328/1.11 =

T= [tricumference] 17.77777297297r

5.92592(3)=

The divisions of 3rds in the long form 17.77776

Squares: Z/W = 21.92592/19.733328 = 1.111111r

Triangles: Z/D = 21.92592/9.866664 = 2.222222r

Whole conceptual shape: 5.92592(9)= 53.33328/16=3.33333 (Accurate 3.33)

Circle: W/Hyp = 19.733328/5.92592 =3.3300024300024r (This 3.33 is different because it is a

descriptive measure of two isosceles triangles that compose a square.)

Veit: T/P= 17.77776/16 = 1.11111

Complete: 5.92592(3) = 17.77776 (A descriptive measure of equilateral triangles, one in this

case. The 5.92592 number is a diagonal and would be illustrated as a traditional

diameter/diagonal.)

16(1.11111) = 17.77776

vdhyp (3)(4)1.48148 = 17.77776

½ p/.45 8/.45 = 17.77777r

Long-form = 17.77777297297r

Pi circumference = 17.771545098891