Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Project Management is an Organizations
Lethal Weapon
Presenter: Kris Bailey MLP, BA, MBA, PMP, ICD.D
Business Owner: AiCon Inc.
Let’s do an inventory
Project Managers
• Small (<$1M, 3-5 people, 2-4 deliverables)
• Medium (<$5M, 6-10 persons, 3-8 deliverables)
• Large ($-5-10M, 10-20 persons, 5-10 deliverables)
• Very Large Projects ($>20M, 20+ internal & external)
2
Let’s do an inventory
Type of Projects
• IT applications (new or replacement); e-commerce;
application development; enterprise-wide systems
• Automation
• Organizational change (merger, acquisition, cultural re-
boot)
• Construction
3
Let’s do an inventory
• Leaders who sign off on project
• People who work on projects
• Stakeholders
• 3rd party
4
Learning Objectives
1. Key characteristics and skills of a PM who keeps a project aligned with scope, expectations and leadership wants / needs.
2. What “value” does a well managed project bring to an organization.
3. What constraints, barriers and risks have I encountered.
4. What lessons have I learned, particularly how to balance life and a demanding job.
5
Project
Is
• an undertaking aimed at satisfying a requirement;
• a specific, non-routine, finite, one-time activity performed by people;
• With well defined set of desired outcomes; and
• Constrained by limited resources and risk(s)
For a
• person, department, organization(s) who will use the outcome to
improve value.
6
My version of a project
Is an art and is a science, is an attitude and a way of
implementing business decisions. It is a one-time
activity, with well-defined outcomes requiring
interdependency of skills, products and processes.
Competent Project Managers use a project
management toolkit to enable organizations to realize
their vision, as execution matters.
7
Why Project Management?
• Growing demand for projects that are complex, take months/years to
deliver, involve multiple parties, cost a lot that deliver integrated
and/or customized goods and services using internal staff and/or 3rd
party vendors.
• Takes Time (duration), cost (internal / external human resources,
capital & operating funds), complexity and quality criteria
matched against
• RoI (revenue & sustainability), RoQ (quality) and RoF (risk of failure).
8
Project System
A System is a group of interdependent components.....
each component is dependent on one or more of the
other components to performs its function.
People Cost Integration Time Communication
Scope Quality Risk Context Procurement
1. What component is most often emphasized?
2. Ignored? With what impact?
9
Adaptable to Complexity
- # / type persons needed- # & size of deliverables- Complexity of deliverables- Timetable- Task interdependence
Dose of Reality
- Culture- $ needed / available- H-R needed / available- Org. Complexity- Achievable
Projects Need
TeamworkWorking groups or teams – what is yours? (see HBR – On Point, The Discipline of Teams)
OwnershipManagers, Sponsors, Boards
Plans are not successful, People are!
CommittedLeaders
10
What does a PM do?
• Project Initiation
• Project Planning
• Project Execution
• Project Control
• Project Closure
• Review and Reflect
COMMUNICATE
Working Group Oversight
Politics
Government
11
TimeCost
QualityRisk
Is <
RoI,RoQ
COMMUNICATION
Business Case
Business Case Review
Detail Design
Develop & Build
PilotValidate, Test, Monitor, Adjust
Implementation
Feedback, Learn, Adapt
Project Charter
Requirements
Specifications
Integration
Success
or
Failure
Baseline actualConcept Phase
12
A Systems Approach
1. Develop ProjectCharter
2. Select Players
3. Determine Task or WBS
Steps
4. Identify Key Customer &
Suppliers
5. Develop PerformanceIndicators
6. Develop Monitoring &
Feedback Loops
7. Analyze & Manage Risks
8. Develop Performance
Strategy
12
Step one
Why?
• To get everyone on the project team aligned
Method
• Identify customer requirements
• Set scope, determine goals
• Determine criteria for success (KPIs)
• Identify key assumptions and constraints
• Identify and analyze stakeholders
• Develop an outcome statement
• Identify barriers to success and potential risks
1. Develop ProjectCharter
14
COACH
STRATEGY:INVOLVE
RED FLAG
STRATEGY: COLLABORATE
EVEN KEEL
STRATEGY:MONITOR
ANTI-SPONSOR
STRATEGY:DEFEND
Low
High
High
Pote
ntial fo
r co-o
pera
tion
Potential for threat
Stakeholder Analysis
1. Develop ProjectCharter
15
Communications
INFORMAL
• More than 60% is informal
• Undocumented and spontaneous
(chatter)
• Talking maintains integrity of
relationships
6. Develop
Monitoring &
Feedback LoopsFORMAL
Documentation of project meetings, memoranda and other visible interactions
Assure that the right people get
accurate information at the right time
• Project Report
• Regular Project Mtgs.
• Townhall Meetings
• Newsletter, Chat rooms, file sharing
• Executive Summaries
Nobody ever died of over communication
Learning cannot occur without feedback
16
Risk
• Definitions
- Factors – are particular events, situations, processes, which have
the potential to adversely affect the outcome of a project
- Risk is equal to the sum of possible factors on the project
Risk = sum of (impact of factors probability of occurrence)
• Uncertainty is the parent of all risk
• Not everyone can manage risk, so project managers must
gauge client tolerance for ambiguity – but not ignore it.
Faced with uncertainty, we so often
resort to arranging the deck chairs
on our Titanic project ship.
Former Project Manager
7. Analyse& Manage
Risks
17
Risk
In general there are
• known and unknown factors
with
• known and unknown risks
Risk management involves
• Identification of risks
• Analyze and quantify
• Respond and mitigate
• Monitor and adapt and/or fix
The only real enemy of the known-
factor-known-risk, is denial.
Unknown
Known
UnknownKnown
Your duty
What if’s
Explore theFactor
Focus onthe Risk
Factor
Risk
7. Analyse& Manage
Risks
18
Story 1 - Success
• 3rd party representing 1- client (private sector US-based organizations)
• 3 PM’s –client (lab), client (build) -construction
• Project (concept to go-live):
- Design/Build greenfield 20,000 sq ft
facility (all 3)
- Select, purchase Total lab automation
solution (me)
- Workflow re-design / Lean (me)
- Retool workforce (me)
- New information system / automation
middleware (me)
- Relocation and implementation
- $25 M; 3 years from concept to
operational go-live
Architectural Showcase for Clinical
Laboratories: Won ‘Citation of Merit’ in
HealthCare Design – international
Construction Design of Merit
Considered the “go to laboratory” for
innovation, design and efficiency
Project was delivered early
Project was delivered under budget
Project working groups were fully engaged
with developed leaders
No staff quit
All systems worked
19
Skills
A successful project manager is one who intuitively understands and demonstrates the attitude, behavior and commitment of project
management.
1. Project Leadership - vision, strategy, project decision makers, execution and reporting
2. Communication – clarity, top-down & bottom-up, 3rd party, stakeholders
3. Systems thinking - scheduling, prioritization, resource management, connections and assignments
4. Risk Management – issues identification - resolution & high level control
5. Persuasion and Negotiation – people leadership, conflict resolution
There are others …
The selection of a PM is one who can get you where you want to go and what they can do NOT what they have done.
Eric Kikuchi Linked In
20
Story 2 - Unsuccessful
• 3rd party representing 2- US client
(hospital academic organizations)
• 4 PM’s – client (build), client (lab), client
(IT), construction
• Project (concept / detail design ONLY):
- Design/Build greenfield 15,000 sq ft facility
- Select, purchase Total lab automation (me)
- Workflow re-design / Lean (me)
- New information system (client IT) /
automation middleware (me) – 43 mission
critical identified projects
- $20 M (construction); 1 year
• Risks included integration and go-live of IT
systems, timing, decanting from hospital
site; potential loss of “promised” revenue of
$12/month from Outreach / Sales
Concept / design detail delivered on-time
≠ Intensive, micromanaged project from
Sponsor
≠ Real decision makers were unknown to the
contract PM (me)
≠ IT / client not in sync (including outsourcing
of client IT to 3rd party); IT / telecom /
automation vendor order & contract issues
≠ Project was not approved by the medical staff
≠ Management issues with the unions
≠ Sponsors, management and physicians
needed a PM on-site at their beck and call
≠ Project working groups were NOT fully
engaged
21
22
Aptitudes
1. Calmly, work with and through people!
2. Be relentlessly organized & disciplined.
3. Use logic and critical thinking.
4. Have a sense of humour.
5. Be comfortable in uncertainty – life is messy!
6. Be patient – Listen - stay with the questions, the rhetoric & the fears.
7. If 3rd party, learn the local constraints & assumptions – FAST; be prepared to fall on your sword to save the internal team.
8. BE authentic – if bad news, be clear and early.
23
Story 3 – 70 (success):30
• CEO (me) as PM and Sponsor for the
company (private sector organization)
• 2 PM’s – client (me), client (IT – 3rd party)
• Project:
- Network upgrade (IT)
- New information system, 47 hospital interfaces
and CRM (IT)
- New Finance system with integration to Ops (IT)
- E-commerce – QM & Risk Management
- Workflow re-design / Lean (me)
- Website updating and new website for new
business line
- $1 M
• Risks included timing, 47 foreign hospital lab
interfaces, integration and go-live of IT
systems while launching a new business
Small company, with limited H-R and $
resources but with big hearts and can-do
attitude
√ Network upgrade, new info system with 47
interfaces and workflow redesign and
finance system were done on time and on
budget (including a government grant
handled via MentorWorks)
≠ Integration of Finance / Ops PROBLEMS;
costing overage of $500K (unknown risk)
≠ Risk Management not implemented
≠ Legacy web-site not implemented
• CEO: PM, sponsor and board liaison
24
Constraints & Barriers
• Management’s words do not match their actions
• Underestimate scope and resources
• Unknown risks
• Lack of accountability to scope, time & resources
• Conflicting goals and priorities
• Inadequate and inappropriate communication
• Detractors, saboteurs – passive aggressive are the worst
• Unexamined and unknown assumptions
• LIFE … lack of scenario planning
25
As per Harold Schroeder (Linked In)
The most commonly cited reasons for failure of complex projects:
• Managing People
• Team members from multiple organizations, working from a variety
of locations, often crossing national boundaries, who are multi-
lingual and multi-cultural
• Reconciling organizational cultures
Formula for success (smooth implementation, achieving
business objectives and generating intended value)
Project management is a combination of Art (culture & people) and Science (best practice business + PM tools + techniques)
26
Why Projects fail?
• Not Motivating the project players
• Poor communication (listener and questioner)
• Insufficient resources (type, number and duration)
• Ignore cost, quality and time; scope creep
• Lack of integrated planning, development and execution
• Insufficient support senior management where leadership has ‘Lost the plot’
27
What did I learn?The Good
• Remain calm and positive
• Always keep the outcome centered
• Keep focused
• Learn the culture
• Know the players and the sub-plots
• Get referrals, if 3rd party (reputation and income)
• Leaders are the architects of strategies & activities that spur innovation and growth
• Be a great communicator and coordinator
• Run common meetings
• Use stage-gate approaches to risky and highly technical projects
• Create opportunities for growth and partnership.
28
What did I learn?The Not so Good
• Over-controlling leaders (sponsor group, CEO, Boards)
• Not understanding the culture (sometimes it is well hidden)
• Not knowing the power brokers and the control owners
• Great PM’s ≠ Ops leaders (get caught up in the day to day)
• Being an internal project manager is good for understanding
the context and knowing the resources but may not have
positional power with leverage (sometimes viewed as just a
staff position!)
29
3030
31
Tom Peters, on project management
• Seeing the big picture and the small detail;
• Providing inspirational leadership one moment and detailed management the next;
• Holding autocrat / delegator roles dependent on the circumstances; and
• Handling complexity while keeping the rules simple.
In Search of Excellence
32
Value is a Lethal Weapon
• Canada GDP is 2-3%; balanced deficit to GDP – tough to deliver complex
projects on time, on budget, to specifications with RoI and RoQ.
• Replication of products, services and pricing strategies can be easily
copied and beat by the competition.
• Time (duration), cost (internal / external human resources & capital &
operating funds), complexity and quality is managed with positive
rewards of RoI and RoQ with staff enthusiasm / ownership.
• Realizing vision and executing business objectives sets companies apart
from their competition.
• Operational leadership ≠ Project Management & vise versa
• Successful project management is HARD.
Replicating a PM talent and behavior is nearly impossible!
33
Project Management Trends
• Business Agility – effective in boosting communication, making teams more
receptive to change and improving RoI; caters to younger workers; proliferation of
tools using AI while automating project management decisions
• Leverage Staff Strengths – recognize employees vs hierarchies; people deliver
projects – they are invaluable
• Focus on Project Strategy – org’s are constantly affected by competition, lack
of resources and time / budgetary difficulties – focus more on reaching corporate goals
• Accountability and Social Responsibility – and RoI too
• Remote Project Management Tools, Labour & Security –
recognizing a more mobile workforce
• Contemporary Leadership
34
This is a little story about four people named Everybody, Somebody, Anybody and Nobody.
There was an important job to be done and Everybody was sure that Somebody would do it.
Anybody could have done it, but Nobody did it.
Somebody got angry about that because it was Everybody’s job.
Everybody thought that Anybody could do it, but Nobody realized that Everybody wouldn’t do it.
It ended up that Everybody blamed Somebody when Nobody did what Anybody could have done.
Poem
Condensed version of Charles Osgood’s poem
35
Thank You
36
Presenter: Kris Bailey MLP, BA, MBA, PMP, ICD.D (on Linked In)
Business Owner: AiCon Inc.