Upload
amberlynn-norman
View
218
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Progress Monitoring Intensive Behavior Supports
December, 2008, 2008
Overview
• Progress Monitoring Tools
• Data Based Decision Rules
• Modifications for non-responders
Big Ideas in FBA and Intervention Planning
• Different levels of FBA
• Build FBA/behavior plan on response classes
• Build capacity at the school level to conduct efficient FBAs
• Make the smallest change that will produce the largest impact
Common Practices
• The “check in”
• Lots of data, no graph
• Waiting for the student to fail before changing the intervention
• Changing several components of the intervention at one time
• Failing to document changes to the intervention
Ensuring Data-Based Decisions
• Must develop systems that support: – Data collection procedures– Summarizing data– Reviewing data on a regular basis – Data-based decision making
For more information on systems…
• Intensive Positive Behavior Support (IPBS) Project
• http://www.uoecs.org
• Examples?
Progress Monitoring Tools:
• SWIS: Majors and Minors
• Percent of points earned on behavior card (SWIS or Excel)
• Daily Teacher Ratings
• Direct Observations
• DIBELS/AIMSWEB (more on this later…)
Progress Monitoring Tools
• Must reflect the behavior of concern
• Frequent (daily is best)
• Efficient
• Sensitive to change
SWIS
• Office referrals may provide some indication of change, but are probably not adequate for secondary/tertiary support alone
• Recommendation: Use ODRs as a secondary piece of data when evaluating effects of an intervention plan
Percentage of points
• Daily points on a behavior card are highly correlated with direct observations IF the card is used correctly
(Campbell & Anderson, 2008)
Daily Teacher Ratings
• Correlated with points and direct observations– Must be specific – Must be objective – Must occur daily – Compare with typical peers
(Campbell & Anderson, 2008)
Data-Based Decision Rules
• Establish general rules for determining whether or not to change an intervention plan
• Rules should be flexible
Browder, D. M., & West, B. J. (1991). Assessment of social skills and interfering behavior. In D. M. Browder Assessment of individuals
Data-Based Decision Rules for Deceleration Behavior
Trend
1. Clear,rapid deceleration
2. Evidence of deceleration
Intervention mean lower than baseline mean
OR
Standard quarter intersect method shows decelerating trend
3. No evidence of deceleration (e.g., flat or accelerating mean same as baseline)
Other Considerations
2a. Considerations to continue intervention
Acceleration in alternative behavior
First period of evaluation
Prediction line shows acceptable rate of deceleration
2b. Considerations to change intervention
None of 2a considerations present
Behavior presents physical danger
Behavior or intervention has created major disruption in instruction
3a. Considerations to continue intervention
Acceleration in alternative behavior
First period of evaluation
“Extinction burst” apparent
3b. Considerations to change intervention
None of 3a considerations present
Behavior presents a physical danger
Behavior or intervention has created major disruption in overall intervention
Decision
1. Continue intervention
2a. Continue intervention
2b. Change intervention
3a. Continue intervention
3b. Change intervention
•
Baseline = 50%
Browder, D. M., & West, B. J. (1991). Assessment of social skills and interfering behavior. In D. M. Browder Assessment of individuals
Data-Based Decision Rules for Deceleration Behavior
Trend
1. Clear,rapid deceleration
2. Evidence of deceleration
Intervention mean lower than baseline mean
OR
Standard quarter intersect method shows decelerating trend
3. No evidence of deceleration (e.g., flat or accelerating mean same as baseline)
Other Considerations
2a. Considerations to continue intervention
Acceleration in alternative behavior
First period of evaluation
Prediction line shows acceptable rate of deceleration
2b. Considerations to change intervention
None of 2a considerations present
Behavior presents physical danger
Behavior or intervention has created major disruption in instruction
3a. Considerations to continue intervention
Acceleration in alternative behavior
First period of evaluation
“Extinction burst” apparent
3b. Considerations to change intervention
None of 3a considerations present
Behavior presents a physical danger
Behavior or intervention has created major disruption in overall intervention
Decision
1. Continue intervention
2a. Continue intervention
2b. Change intervention
3a. Continue intervention
3b. Change intervention
•
Browder, D. M., & West, B. J. (1991). Assessment of social skills and interfering behavior. In D. M. Browder Assessment of individuals
Data-Based Decision Rules for Deceleration Behavior
Trend
1. Clear,rapid deceleration
2. Evidence of deceleration
Intervention mean lower than baseline mean
OR
Standard quarter intersect method shows decelerating trend
3. No evidence of deceleration (e.g., flat or accelerating mean same as baseline)
Other Considerations
2a. Considerations to continue intervention
Acceleration in alternative behavior
First period of evaluation
Prediction line shows acceptable rate of deceleration
2b. Considerations to change intervention
None of 2a considerations present
Behavior presents physical danger
Behavior or intervention has created major disruption in instruction
3a. Considerations to continue intervention
Acceleration in alternative behavior
First period of evaluation
“Extinction burst” apparent
3b. Considerations to change intervention
None of 3a considerations present
Behavior presents a physical danger
Behavior or intervention has created major disruption in overall intervention
Decision
1. Continue intervention
2a. Continue intervention
2b. Change intervention
3a. Continue intervention
3b. Change intervention
•
Allowed Brian special peer time for reward
Browder, D. M., & West, B. J. (1991). Assessment of social skills and interfering behavior. In D. M. Browder Assessment of individuals
Data-Based Decision Rules for Deceleration Behavior
Trend
1. Clear,rapid deceleration
2. Evidence of deceleration
Intervention mean lower than baseline mean
OR
Standard quarter intersect method shows decelerating trend
3. No evidence of deceleration (e.g., flat or accelerating mean same as baseline)
Other Considerations
2a. Considerations to continue intervention
Acceleration in alternative behavior
First period of evaluation
Prediction line shows acceptable rate of deceleration
2b. Considerations to change intervention
None of 2a considerations present
Behavior presents physical danger
Behavior or intervention has created major disruption in instruction
3a. Considerations to continue intervention
Acceleration in alternative behavior
First period of evaluation
“Extinction burst” apparent
3b. Considerations to change intervention
None of 3a considerations present
Behavior presents a physical danger
Behavior or intervention has created major disruption in overall intervention
Decision
1. Continue intervention
2a. Continue intervention
2b. Change intervention
3a. Continue intervention
3b. Change intervention
•
Allowed Brian special peer time for reward
Browder, D. M., & West, B. J. (1991). Assessment of social skills and interfering behavior. In D. M. Browder Assessment of individuals
Data-Based Decision Rules for Deceleration Behavior
Trend
1. Clear,rapid deceleration
2. Evidence of deceleration
Intervention mean lower than baseline mean
OR
Standard quarter intersect method shows decelerating trend
3. No evidence of deceleration (e.g., flat or accelerating mean same as baseline)
Other Considerations
2a. Considerations to continue intervention
Acceleration in alternative behavior
First period of evaluation
Prediction line shows acceptable rate of deceleration
2b. Considerations to change intervention
None of 2a considerations present
Behavior presents physical danger
Behavior or intervention has created major disruption in instruction
3a. Considerations to continue intervention
Acceleration in alternative behavior
First period of evaluation
“Extinction burst” apparent
3b. Considerations to change intervention
None of 3a considerations present
Behavior presents a physical danger
Behavior or intervention has created major disruption in overall intervention
Decision
1. Continue intervention
2a. Continue intervention
2b. Change intervention
3a. Continue intervention
3b. Change intervention
Combining Academic and Behavior Supports
An example: Combining reading with behavior support for escape maintained behavior
DesiredAlternative
AcceptableAlternative
TypicalConsequence
Told “good job”Get good grades
Do workw/o
complaints.
Ask forbreak,ask forhelp.
The Competing Pathways chart for our friend Eddie
Setting Events TriggeringAntecedents
MaintainingConsequences
ProblemBehavior
Extended structured
activity (Reading)
Do difficult reading task(grade level
material)
Threatens, Uses profanity
Remove fromclass.
Function
Avoid task
Setting EventStrategies
AntecedentStrategies
ConsequenceStrategies
BehaviorTeaching Strategies
Teach alternatives to problem behavior:
1. Ask for break2. Ask for help
Teach reading fluency development
Teach problem-solving skills
Provide Reading curriculum at appropriate level
Additional instruction in reading (fluency)
1:1 instruction in Reading
Prompt task completion
Make task less difficult
Do first activity together
Provide different tasks
Present “forced” choice of which reading assignment to do first
Provide reward within 1 min. of starting task (3 min., 5 min., 10 minutes)
Give break & help when requested
Minimize rewards for problem behavior (don’t remove to a nicer area)
Reward expectations
Possible Interventions for Eddie
Eddie’s Evaluation Procedures
Data to be Collected
Procedures for Data CollectionPerson
responsibleBy When
Daily report on whether or not he met his goal each class period
Daily behavior report card. Make sure all staff (e.g., homeroom teacher, music teacher, etc.) understand purpose and use card consistently. Teacher responsible for filling out card on daily basis. Report data to team on Behavior Support Plan Chart.
School psychologist initiates and monitors
Begin immediately; continue at least to first review period.
Major discipline referrals
Major discipline referrals are entered into SWIS. Reports are generated prior to each progress review period
Office secretary enters SWIS data and generate reports
SWIS entered on regular basis
Short term goal: Ask for “break” or assistance when frustrated
Long term goal: Reading fluently at 154 word correct per minute on grade level material
Eddie’s Evaluation Procedures
Data to be Collected
Procedures for Data CollectionPerson
responsibleBy When
Oral reading fluency
Assessment progress monitoring probes weekly on grade level material
Classroom teacher
Begin immediately; review progress every three weeks
Short term goal: Ask for “break” or assistance when frustrated
Long term goal: Reading fluently at 154 word correct per minute on grade level material
Percent of points earned by Eddie on Daily Progress Report
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
100
11
/51
1/6
11
/71
1/8
11
/91
1/1
01
1/1
11
1/1
21
1/1
31
1/1
41
1/1
51
1/1
61
1/1
71
1/1
81
1/1
91
1/2
01
1/2
11
1/2
21
1/2
31
1/2
41
1/2
51
1/2
61
1/2
71
1/2
81
1/2
91
1/3
01
2/1
12
/21
2/3
12
/41
2/5
12
/61
2/7
12
/81
2/9
12
/10
12
/11
12
/12
12
/13
12
/14
12
/15
12
/16
12
/17
12
/18
12
/19
12
/20
12
/21
12
/22
12
/23
12
/24
12
/25
12
/26
12
/27
12
/28
12
/29
12
/30
12
/31
1/1
1/2
1/3
1/4
GoalBehavior Education Program 2005
Daily Report Card + silent reading in study hall
Daily Report Card with choice of incentives from “treasure chest”
Fictional Data
#1 extra silent reading practice 15 minutes during study hall
Eddie: Progress monitoring on Oral Reading Fluency
Fictional Data
Percent of points earned by Eddie on Daily Progress Report
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
100
11
/51
1/6
11
/71
1/8
11
/91
1/1
01
1/1
11
1/1
21
1/1
31
1/1
41
1/1
51
1/1
61
1/1
71
1/1
81
1/1
91
1/2
01
1/2
11
1/2
21
1/2
31
1/2
41
1/2
51
1/2
61
1/2
71
1/2
81
1/2
91
1/3
01
2/1
12
/21
2/3
12
/41
2/5
12
/61
2/7
12
/81
2/9
12
/10
12
/11
12
/12
12
/13
12
/14
12
/15
12
/16
12
/17
12
/18
12
/19
12
/20
12
/21
12
/22
12
/23
12
/24
12
/25
12
/26
12
/27
12
/28
12
/29
12
/30
12
/31
1/1
1/2
1/3
1/4
GoalBehavior Education Program 2005
Daily Report Card + silent reading in study hall
Daily Report Card with choice of incentives from “treasure chest” + Read Naturally
Fictional Data
#1 extra silent reading practice 15 minutes during study hall
#2
Read Naturally in reading lab for 30 minutes during study hall
Eddie: Progress monitoring on Oral Reading Fluency
Fictional Data
Problem-Solving
Problem Solving
Problem Solving
Problem Solving