33
Professor Jean Penny, University of Derby [email protected] Embedding Improvement Science in Training Programmes: Why Bother?

Professor Jean Penny, University of Derby [email protected] Embedding Improvement Science in Training Programmes: Why Bother?

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Professor Jean Penny, University of Derby jean.penny@btinternet.com Embedding Improvement Science in Training Programmes: Why Bother?

Professor Jean Penny, University of [email protected]

Embedding Improvement Science in Training Programmes:

Why Bother?

Page 2: Professor Jean Penny, University of Derby jean.penny@btinternet.com Embedding Improvement Science in Training Programmes: Why Bother?

All working life in and with NHSDiagnostic Radiographer and teacherNational improvement roles 1994 – 2008Improvement educator and advisor 2008 – present Awarded OBE for services to NHS 2003Visiting professor University of Derby 2008

[email protected]

Improvement: 19 years and still learning

Page 3: Professor Jean Penny, University of Derby jean.penny@btinternet.com Embedding Improvement Science in Training Programmes: Why Bother?

Healthcare will not realise its full potential unless change

(improvement) making becomes an intrinsic part of everyone’s job, every

day, in all parts of the system.

Batalden, P. B et al. Quality and Safety in Health Care 2007;16:2-3

Page 4: Professor Jean Penny, University of Derby jean.penny@btinternet.com Embedding Improvement Science in Training Programmes: Why Bother?

◦ What is Improvement Science?

◦ Why bother embedding it into training programmes?

Page 5: Professor Jean Penny, University of Derby jean.penny@btinternet.com Embedding Improvement Science in Training Programmes: Why Bother?

Who likes change?

Page 6: Professor Jean Penny, University of Derby jean.penny@btinternet.com Embedding Improvement Science in Training Programmes: Why Bother?

Any improvement is a change◦not every change is an improvement◦but we cannot improve something unless

we change it

Eliyahu GoldrattGoldratt E (1990) Theory of Constraints, North River

Press, Massachusetts

Page 7: Professor Jean Penny, University of Derby jean.penny@btinternet.com Embedding Improvement Science in Training Programmes: Why Bother?

Any improvement is a change any change is a perceived threat to security◦there will always be someone who will

look at the suggested change as a threat

Eliyahu Goldratt

Page 8: Professor Jean Penny, University of Derby jean.penny@btinternet.com Embedding Improvement Science in Training Programmes: Why Bother?

Any improvement is a change any change is a perceived threat to security

any threat to security gives rise to emotional resistance◦ you can rarely overcome emotional resistance

with logic alone

Eliyahu Goldratt

Page 9: Professor Jean Penny, University of Derby jean.penny@btinternet.com Embedding Improvement Science in Training Programmes: Why Bother?

“Anyone who thinks you can

overcome emotional

resistance with logic was probably

never married”

Page 10: Professor Jean Penny, University of Derby jean.penny@btinternet.com Embedding Improvement Science in Training Programmes: Why Bother?

Any improvement is a change any change is a perceived threat to

security any threat to security gives rise to

emotional resistance emotional resistance can only be

overcome by a stronger emotion

Eliyahu Goldratt

Page 11: Professor Jean Penny, University of Derby jean.penny@btinternet.com Embedding Improvement Science in Training Programmes: Why Bother?

What to change?◦ Pin point the core problems

What to change to?◦ Construct (simple) practical solutions

How to cause the change?◦ Induce the appropriate people to invent such solutions ◦ they must own the problem

Eliyahu GoldrattGoldratt E (1990) Theory of Constraints, North River

Press, Massachusetts

Page 12: Professor Jean Penny, University of Derby jean.penny@btinternet.com Embedding Improvement Science in Training Programmes: Why Bother?

4 equally important parts of improvement

Diagnostic tools and techniques

Project and programme

management

User and public involvement

Change management

Discipline of improvement in health and social care (Penny 2003)

People Process

What

How

Page 13: Professor Jean Penny, University of Derby jean.penny@btinternet.com Embedding Improvement Science in Training Programmes: Why Bother?

If I had one hour to save the world, I would spend 59 minutes defining the problem and one minute finding a solution

A Einstein

Page 14: Professor Jean Penny, University of Derby jean.penny@btinternet.com Embedding Improvement Science in Training Programmes: Why Bother?

Challenge the

paradigms

Page 15: Professor Jean Penny, University of Derby jean.penny@btinternet.com Embedding Improvement Science in Training Programmes: Why Bother?

What are you trying to accomplish?

How will you know that a change is an improvement?

What changes can you make that will result in the improvements that

you seek ?

Act Plan

Study Do

The Model for The Model for Improvement Improvement Understanding the problem.

Defining what you’re trying to do

Langley G, Moen R, Nolan K, Nolan T, Norman C, Provost L, (2009), The improvement guide: a practical approach to enhancing organizational

performance 2nd ed, Jossey Bass Publishers, San Francisco

Page 16: Professor Jean Penny, University of Derby jean.penny@btinternet.com Embedding Improvement Science in Training Programmes: Why Bother?
Page 17: Professor Jean Penny, University of Derby jean.penny@btinternet.com Embedding Improvement Science in Training Programmes: Why Bother?

Average length of pre-ward stayStroke Ward

from 01/2007 to 07/2007

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7Months

Mike Davidge NHS Institute for Innovation and

Improvement

Average length of pre-ward stayStroke Ward

from 01/2007 to 07/2007

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

9.0

1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31

Weeks

Patient length of pre-ward stay Stroke Ward

from 01/2007 to 07/2007

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

30.0

35.0

Patients

Page 18: Professor Jean Penny, University of Derby jean.penny@btinternet.com Embedding Improvement Science in Training Programmes: Why Bother?

What are you trying to accomplish?

How will you know that a change is an improvement?

What changes can you make that will result in the improvements that

you seek ?

Act Plan

Study Do

The Model for The Model for Improvement Improvement

What have others done? What does the evidence say? What hunches do we have? What can we learn as we go along?

Langley G, Moen R, Nolan K, Nolan T, Norman C, Provost L, (2009), The improvement guide: a practical approach to enhancing organizational

performance 2nd ed, Jossey Bass Publishers, San Francisco

Page 19: Professor Jean Penny, University of Derby jean.penny@btinternet.com Embedding Improvement Science in Training Programmes: Why Bother?

Solution / change in

team / organisation A

Change principle Change principle

Solution / change in team / organisation

B

Page 20: Professor Jean Penny, University of Derby jean.penny@btinternet.com Embedding Improvement Science in Training Programmes: Why Bother?

PDSA cycle for learning and PDSA cycle for learning and improvementimprovement

Act

• what changes are to be made?

• next cycle?

Plan•objective• questions and predictions (why)• plan to carry out the cycle (who, what, where, when)

Study

•complete the analysis of the data

•compare data to predictions

•summarise what was learned

Do

• carry out the plan• document problems and unexpected observations• begin analysis of the data

We planned to.......( state the basic plan)In order to ….. (tie it back to the aim)

What we did was….. (brief description of actions)

Looking at what happened, what we learned from this was….. (lessons learned)

What we plan to do next is …. (state next plan)

Page 21: Professor Jean Penny, University of Derby jean.penny@btinternet.com Embedding Improvement Science in Training Programmes: Why Bother?

The Model for Improvement breaks things down into small steps and works on the ‘little dots’ – at the frontline

These small steps should be part of the answer to the question of how to move the ‘big dots’

Align all improvement projects to strategy

Page 22: Professor Jean Penny, University of Derby jean.penny@btinternet.com Embedding Improvement Science in Training Programmes: Why Bother?

Intervention 1

Intervention 2

Intervention 3

Intervention 1

Intervention 2

Intervention 3

Intervention 1

Intervention 2

Intervention 3

The interventions / change ideas that contribute directly to secondary drivers

Secondary Drivers:Contribute directly to

primary drivers

Intervention 1

Intervention 2

Intervention 3

Intervention 1

Intervention 2

Intervention 3

?

Primary Drivers:Contribute

directly to the strategic aim

The strategic aim (and

big problem)

Page 23: Professor Jean Penny, University of Derby jean.penny@btinternet.com Embedding Improvement Science in Training Programmes: Why Bother?

◦ What is Improvement Science?

◦ Why bother embedding it into training programmes?

Page 24: Professor Jean Penny, University of Derby jean.penny@btinternet.com Embedding Improvement Science in Training Programmes: Why Bother?

To develop health and social care students who are curious about how they could improve their service, and who are receptive to different ideas and able to bring about the necessary changes by applying a variety of tools and techniques in their own context

Improvement in pre-registration Improvement in pre-registration education: education: aim – to raise awareness to aim – to raise awareness to improvement for better safer careimprovement for better safer care

2006

Page 25: Professor Jean Penny, University of Derby jean.penny@btinternet.com Embedding Improvement Science in Training Programmes: Why Bother?

‘my duty, part of my professional role, I should get involved’

‘be prepared to extend role and take on new responsibilities’

‘small problems have a big impact on patients’

‘anyone can take part – we’re all responsible’

‘I have the skills’

Tribal consulting, External evaluation 08/09

Page 26: Professor Jean Penny, University of Derby jean.penny@btinternet.com Embedding Improvement Science in Training Programmes: Why Bother?

‘…..I have interviewed over 100 applicants of newly qualified staff …..One of the questions asked was " Service development is everyone's responsibility, …have you been involved in any changes happening while you have been on a placement?

It was obvious …that one particular University's candidates had all identified an area for improvement in practice .. and had tested and evaluated them during their stay there. Some of their ideas were still in use and others were not. Some of the ideas were interesting and made us think about looking at those areas for improvement ourselves.

…..it was very clear that the candidates from other local universities had not been involved in any changes

……we employed those that could clearly discuss how to introduce and evaluate a change in practice or improvement to patient care’. 

Nurse Manager, Neonatal Unit, North of England, March 2011

It is making a difference......

Page 27: Professor Jean Penny, University of Derby jean.penny@btinternet.com Embedding Improvement Science in Training Programmes: Why Bother?

Engagement of key stakeholders◦ Barriers in engaging

with practice◦ Engaging Faculty and

colleagues Resources

◦ Time◦ Funding◦ Human Resources

and Extra work◦ Rooms

Timescale / Timing◦ University structures i.e.

plan everything in advance

◦ Difficult time as currently revalidating

◦ Difficulty getting everybody in the same room at the same time

Attitudes◦ Student Attitude and

receptiveness◦ Staff Attitude and

receptiveness

Tribal Consulting, External evaluation of 08/09

Page 28: Professor Jean Penny, University of Derby jean.penny@btinternet.com Embedding Improvement Science in Training Programmes: Why Bother?

The main challenge to sustainability is ensuring that key faculty and senior academics truly understand and value improvement as a concept. When this happens improvement is prioritised and sustained in an ever pressurised curriculum.

Replies from 33 universities (69%) of the 48 universities on the NHSI contact list

Page 29: Professor Jean Penny, University of Derby jean.penny@btinternet.com Embedding Improvement Science in Training Programmes: Why Bother?

Work with your team /colleagues: value differences Really understand the problem Develop aims and measures: What are you trying to

achieve? Measure for improvement: How will you know a

change is an improvement? Gather change ideas: What changes can you make

that will result in the improvement you want? Test change ideas (PDSA cycles) before implementing Learn from things that do not work Link frontline changes to strategic objectives

Page 30: Professor Jean Penny, University of Derby jean.penny@btinternet.com Embedding Improvement Science in Training Programmes: Why Bother?

Healthcare will not realise its full potential unless change

(improvement) making becomes an intrinsic part of everyone’s job, every

day, in all parts of the system.

Batalden, P. B et al. Quality and Safety in Health Care 2007;16:2-3

Page 31: Professor Jean Penny, University of Derby jean.penny@btinternet.com Embedding Improvement Science in Training Programmes: Why Bother?

Professor Jean Penny, University of Derby

[email protected]

Embedding Improvement

Science in Training

Programmes: Why Bother?

What are we trying toaccomplish?

How will we know that achange is an improvement?

What change can we make that

will result in improvement?

Model for Improvement

Page 32: Professor Jean Penny, University of Derby jean.penny@btinternet.com Embedding Improvement Science in Training Programmes: Why Bother?
Page 33: Professor Jean Penny, University of Derby jean.penny@btinternet.com Embedding Improvement Science in Training Programmes: Why Bother?

‘Competence: what individuals know or are able to do in terms of knowledge and skill

Capability: extent to which individuals can adapt to change .... and continue to improve their performance’

‘These days there is so much knowledge available that we risk drowning in it.......Learning about how things are interconnected is often more useful than learning about the pieces’

Fraser Greenhalgh (2001) Coping with complexity: educating for capability