Upload
emery-stokes
View
217
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
PROFESSIONAL ETHICS IN A SOCIAL WORK AND HEALTH CONTEXT
David Anderson-FordChair: Brunel University Research Ethics
Committee
Brunel University 2009
Ethics is concerned with how men and women ought to live their lives
Morality concerns the process of deliberation about right and wrong.Moral Immoral
(Right) (Wrong)
Seedhouse D Ethical Issues in Health Care
Brunel University 2009
Two Forms:
• Everyday Ethics• Technical Ethics:
i.e. the attempt to design a theory which is internally coherent and which enables a person to “act morally” (according to the particular theory) whatever the situation in life which confronts her/him.
Brunel University 2009
Aspects of Technical Ethics1. Moral philosophy as a quest to understand
‘good’2. Moral philosophy based on either
consequences or dutiesConsequences (Teleology)
• Utilitarianism (JS Mill)• Consequentialism
Duties (Deontology)• Right/wrong• Duty/obligation – the Moral Imperative (Kant)
3. Moral philosophy as a process of deliberation – Aristotle
Brunel University 2009
Principles of Ethics
Jacques Thiroux (1980) – 5 Principles:• The Value of Life
At all costs? Abortion; Euthanasia; killing in self-defence; war; capital punishment; suicide; moral dilemmas: e.g. ‘quality adjusted life years’ – quantity rather than quality.
Brunel University 2009
• Goodness or RightnessDo no harm: - beneficence
- non-malfeasance- malfeasance
• Justice or FairnessDilemmas e.g. kidney transplants
• Truth-telling or Honesty – fraud/plagiarism• Individual Freedom
Respect for the autonomy of the individual
Brunel University 2009
Human Rights Act 1998• Convention Rights
– Article 2: A right to life– Article 3: Inhuman or degrading treatment– Article 5: A right to liberty and security– Article 6: A right to a fair trial– Article 8: A right to respect for family life and
private life– Article 14: Prohibits discrimination NB: Any interference with convention rights
must be lawful, necessary and proportionate
Brunel University 2009
LEGAL ASPECTS OF PROFESSIONAL
ACCOUNTABILITY
• Professional Negligence• Confidentiality• Consent
Brunel University 2009
LIABILITY IN NEGLIGENCE
Based on concept of duty of care
Brunel University 2009
3 ingredients• The defendant owed the claimant a duty of
care
• The defendant was in breach of that duty by negligent conduct – i.e. a failure to act with reasonable care (+ concept of foreseeability)
• The defendant’s negligent conduct caused damage to the claimant (concept of causation)
Brunel University 2009
Bolam v Friern Barnet Hospital Management Committee (1957)
See now: Bolitho v City and Hackney Heath Authority
(1997)
Brunel University 2009
THE STANDARD OF CARE
The test is the standard of the ordinary skilled [social worker/health professional] exercising and professing to have that special skill. A professional need not possess the highest expert skill…. It is sufficient if s/he exercises the ordinary skill of the ordinary competent person exercising that particular art….”
Brunel University 2009
• “A [social worker/health professional] will not be negligent if s/he acted in accordance with the practice accepted by a responsible body of [health professionals] skilled in that particular art.”
Brunel University 2009
VICARIOUS LIABILITY
The Local Authority/NHS Trust or employer has two forms of liability in negligence:
• Direct liability, i.e. the Local Authority/Trust itself is at fault.
• Vicarious liability (indirect liability), i.e. the Local Authority/Trust is responsible for the faults of others – mainly employees, providing they were acting in the course of employment.
Brunel University 2009
COMPETENCE, CONSENT & COMPULSION
AUTONOMY v PATERNALISM
Brunel University 2009
The Competent Adult/Child
The Nature of Consent
-Express
-Implied ('need to know' basis)
Brunel University 2009
3 issues:
• Was the consent voluntarily given?
• Was the person giving consent appropriately informed beforehand? – issue of informed consent.
• Did the patient/client have capacity in law? -i.e. was the patient/client competent to give consent?
Brunel University 2009
Children
Gillick v West Norfolk & Wisbech Area Health Authority
(1986) Children Act 1989 Test of 'Gillick competence' ? But see: Re R (1992) Re W (1992)
Brunel University 2009
Incapacity: Adults/Children
• Meaning of 'incompetence? Lack of capacity/ ‘decisionally incapable’/intellectually challenged
• Mental Health Acts 1983/2007 • Test of Competence:
Re C (1993)1. Comprehension and retention of information2. Believing such information3. Weighing the information and balancing the risks.See now: B v An NHS Hospital Trust (2002)
Mental Capacity Act 2005
Brunel University 2009