Upload
estella-townsend
View
213
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Problem Solving Problem Solving ModelModel
NC DPI
Summer 2010 1
Preparation Preparation && ImplementationImplementation
North CarolinaNorth Carolina
Let’s review…..
• Two National models of RtI– Problem-solving– Standard Protocol
• North Carolina’s RtI ModelProblem-Solving Model (PSM)
• Four tiersAssessment
• Includes Curriculum Based Measurement (CBM) and Formative Assessment (FA)
2
What is a Problem-Solving Model ?
• Systematic analysis
• Functional assessment
• Data
• Instructional plan
• Plan implementation
• Monitoring
3
Why use a Problem Solving Model ? (PSM)
■ Ensure positive student outcomes, rather than determining failure or deviance
(Deno, 1995)
4
Problem-Solving Model (PSM)
• Core Curriculum assessment
• Meet the needs of diverse learners within school districts
• Identify and implement best educational strategies for all learners
5
So ………• You’ve assessed your core….
• Identified gaps….
• Strengthened your curriculum and instruction…
• Differentiated instruction for all learners………..
AND students are still struggling………
What’s next ?
6
Problem-Solving Model (PSM)Change in mind-set is necessary for all
Student problems are definedQuestions drive assessmentsEngage in instruction that addresses learning Intervention is derived from analysis of
baseline data
7
Implementation of a RtI System
Seven step cyclical process
■ All seven occur throughout the process
8
9
7Problem Solving (PSM) Process
16
5 43
2Step 7Analysis of the
Intervention Planmake a team decision on the
effectiveness of the intervention
Step 1Define the
ProblemDevelop a behavioral (observable) definition
of problem
Step 2Develop an
Assessment PlanGenerate a hypothesis and
assessment questions related to the problem
Step 3Analysis of the
Assessment PlanCreate a functional and
multidimensional assessment to test the hypothesis
Step 4Generate a Goal
StatementSpecific Description of the changes
expected in student behavior
Step 5Develop an
Intervention PlanBase interventions on best
practices and research-proven strategies
Step 6 Implement the
Intervention PlanProvide strategies, materials, and
resources: include progress monitoring
10
7Problem Solving (PSM) Process
16
5 43
2Step 1
Define the Problem
Develop a behavioral (observable) definition
of problem
Step 1: Define the Problem
• Essential step
• Develop a behavioral/academic definition
• Concrete, Observable and Measurable
• Stranger test ?
• Most difficult step !
11
12
7Problem Solving (PSM) Process
16
5 43
2Step 1
Define the Problem
Develop a behavioral (observable) definition
of problem
Step 2Develop an
Assessment PlanGenerate a hypothesis and
assessment questions related to the problem
Step 2: Develop an Assessment Plan
• Generate a hypothesis– Why is the problem occurring ?– Formulate predictions of student’s behavior– Formulate assessment questions to confirm / reject hypothesis
• Procedure (RIOT)– Review– Interview– Observe– Test
13
14
7Problem Solving (PSM) Process
16
5 43
2Step 1
Define the Problem
Develop a behavioral (observable) definition
of problem
Step 2Develop an
Assessment PlanGenerate a hypothesis and
assessment questions related to the problem
Step 3Analysis of the
Assessment PlanCreate a functional and
multidimensional assessment to test the hypothesis
Step 3: Analysis of the Assessment
Plan
Consider all that are relevant
Not required to address all domains each time
I
Domains that impact learning– Curriculum– Instruction– Environment– Learner
Procedure– Review– Interview– Observe– Test
15
16
7Problem Solving (PSM) Process
16
5 43
2Step 1
Define the Problem
Develop a behavioral (observable) definition
of problem
Step 2Develop an
Assessment PlanGenerate a hypothesis and
assessment questions related to the problem
Step 3Analysis of the
Assessment PlanCreate a functional and
multidimensional assessment to test the hypothesis
Step 4Generate a Goal
StatementSpecific Description of the changes
expected in student behavior
Step 4:Generate a Goal Statement
• Essential step
• Precise definition
• Set before plan implementation
• Goal statement- specific description of desired change in student behavior as a result of an intervention
• SMART Goal17
Doran, George T. "There's a S.M.A.R.T. way to write management's goals and objectives." Management Review, Nov 1981, Volume 70 Issue 11.
18
Three Components of a Goal Statement
19
20
7Problem Solving (PSM) Process
16
5 43
2Step 1
Define the Problem
Develop a behavioral (observable) definition
of problem
Step 2Develop an
Assessment PlanGenerate a hypothesis and
assessment questions related to the problem
Step 3Analysis of the
Assessment PlanCreate a functional and
multidimensional assessment to test the hypothesis
Step 4Generate a Goal
StatementSpecific Description of the changes
expected in student behavior
Step 5Develop an
Intervention PlanBase interventions on best
practices and research-proven strategies
Step 5: Develop an Intervention Plan
• Identify methods, procedures and materials that are research-based
• Describe plan of action
• Include specific goals
• Progress-monitoring plans included21
22
7Problem Solving (PSM) Process
16
5 43
2Step 1
Define the Problem
Develop a behavioral (observable) definition
of problem
Step 2Develop an
Assessment PlanGenerate a hypothesis and
assessment questions related to the problem
Step 3Analysis of the
Assessment PlanCreate a functional and
multidimensional assessment to test the hypothesis
Step 4Generate a Goal
StatementSpecific Description of the changes
expected in student behavior
Step 5Develop an
Intervention PlanBase interventions on best
practices and research-proven strategies
Step 6 Implement the
Intervention PlanProvide strategies, materials, and
resources: include progress monitoring
Step 6:Implement the Plan
• Multiple activities– Fidelity and integrity of intervention– Monitor the Intervention
• Effect on student performance• Integrity of implementation
– Make changes as indicated– Decisions !
23
Progress MonitoringAn act of collecting data to determine the
effectiveness of an intervention.
24
Intervention Plan• Continuation of hypothesis-testing step• Evaluate effectiveness of plan• Change as needed• Reasonable plan for implementation
– Clear understanding of implementation– Personnel– Skills and materials
**Retention is not a research-based intervention
25
26
7Problem Solving (PSM) Process
16
5 43
2Step 7Analysis of the
Intervention Planmake a team decision on the
effectiveness of the intervention
Step 1Define the
ProblemDevelop a behavioral (observable) definition
of problem
Step 2Develop an
Assessment PlanGenerate a hypothesis and
assessment questions related to the problem
Step 3Analysis of the
Assessment PlanCreate a functional and
multidimensional assessment to test the hypothesis
Step 4Generate a Goal
StatementSpecific Description of the changes
expected in student behavior
Step 5Develop an
Intervention PlanBase interventions on best
practices and research-proven strategies
Step 6 Implement the
Intervention PlanProvide strategies, materials, and
resources: include progress monitoring
Step 7:Analysis of the Intervention
Plan
EVALUATE the DATA
• Progress monitoring is essential– Examine student performance– Evaluate the effectiveness of instruction
27
School-Wide system of support for student
achievement should look like this:
Intensive Intervention 5%
Strategic Interventions 15%
Core Curriculum 80%
Tier IConsultation
Between Teachers-Parents
Tier II Consultation With OtherResources
Significance of Need(s)
Am
oun
t of R
eso
urce
s Req
uire
d to
Ad
dre
ss Need(s)
Tier IIIConsultation
with the Problem Solving
Team
Tier IVConsideration
for EC referral
The NC Problem-Solving Model
Identify Area(s)
of Need
Implement Plan
Evaluate
Develop a Plan
Tier IConsultation
Between Teachers-Parents
Tier II Consultation With OtherResources
Significance of Need(s)
Am
ount of Resources R
equired to A
ddress Nee
d(s) Benchmark
Strategic
Intensive
Tier IIIConsultation
With the Problem Solving
Team
Tier IVConsideration
ForEC Referral
31
Implementation of a RtI System
• Tiers I-III call for implementation of PSM and CBM in the general education setting
• Tier IV represents referral for consideration of Special Ed– the highest level of service intensity
32
Tier I
Examine the Core
Parent and teacher working together to define the problem
• What is it?• When does it occur?• Why is this happening?• Analyze baseline data or develop plan for
collecting baseline data?
33
Tier II
– Repeat steps of cyclical problem-solving model
– Additional school personnel are involved as needed
• Parent• Teacher• Teaching peer, Counselor, school psychologist,
reading teacher, administrator, social worker, nurse, etc.
34
Tier III
• Steps of cyclical problem-solving model repeat
• Team members may vary
• Problem-solving model forms are completed
• Collect :• Baseline, goal setting, and progress monitoring data
• Data are provided as evidence for need of intervention
35
Tier IVReview all available data and
– Continue interventions at Tier III
OR
–Refer for consideration of special education
If referral is made:Define the problem
Use progress monitoring data as baseline on IEP
IEP (intervention) is developed based on data
36
37
Target Student
Discrepancy 1: Skill Gap (Current Performance Level)
Avg Classroom Academic Performance Level
‘Dual-Discrepancy’: RTI Model of Learning Disability (Fuchs 2003)
Discrepancy 2:Gap in Rate of Learning (‘Slope of Improvement’)
Send us your tired, your hungry, your poor…. Your students who aren’t performing….
• Shift from placement to high quality interventions
• Progress of
ALL students
38