Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
02/10/14 | Dominik Kraus | NIF and JLF User Group Meeting 2014 | 1
Probing matter at Gbar pressures at the NIF
Dominik Kraus Department of Physics
University of California, Berkeley T. Doeppner, A. L. Kritcher, D. C. Swift, J. Hawreliak, D. Chapman, B. Bachmann,
P. M. Celliers, G. W. Collins, T. Darling, E. Dewald, J. Eggert, L. B. Fletcher, E. Foerster, D.O. Gericke, S.H. Glenzer, S. Hamel, R. Hemley, R. Jeanloz, O. L. Landen, H. J. Lee, S. LePape,
T. Ma, E. McKee, D. Milathianaki, J. Nilsen, P. Neumayer, R. Redmer, S. Rose, S. Rothman, C. Keane, and R. W. Falcone
02/10/14 | Dominik Kraus | NIF and JLF User Group Meeting 2014 | 1
02/10/14 | Dominik Kraus | NIF and JLF User Group Meeting 2014 | 2
Matter at Gbar pressure | Challenges and applications
ICF Plasmas at NIF!
Brown Dwarfs!
- Interplay of Coulomb pressure and
electron-degeneracy pressure
- Partial ionization, shell effects
- Difficult description of compressibility and heat capacity
W. B. Hubbard et al, Physics of Plasmas 4, 2011 (1997)
02/10/14 | Dominik Kraus | NIF and JLF User Group Meeting 2014 | 3
Matter at Gbar pressure | Shell effects: heat capacity of aluminum
J. C. Pain, HEDP 3, 204 (2007)
02/10/14 | Dominik Kraus | NIF and JLF User Group Meeting 2014 | 4
Matter at Gbar pressure | Shell effects: Aluminum Hugoniot
J. C. Pain, HEDP 3, 204 (2007)
02/10/14 | Dominik Kraus | NIF and JLF User Group Meeting 2014 | 5
2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5
10−3
10−2
10−1
100
101
mass density [g/cm3]
pre
ssure
[G
bar]
SESAME #7592Cauble et al.Barrios et al.Ozaki et al.
Matter at Gbar pressure | CH Hugoniot & shell structure
PP0~ r−1
02/10/14 | Dominik Kraus | NIF and JLF User Group Meeting 2014 | 6
3.3-mm- diameter large LEH"
Solid CH or CD spheres with Ge preheat shield
Streaked Radiography"
X-ray Scattering"
Zn foil"9 kev line emission"
Au shield "
"Au Hohlraum"(5.75 x 9.42 mm)"Fill: 0.96 mg/cc "4He "
Modified existing NIF platform (1D Convergent Ablator) Main diagnostics: - Streaked X-ray radiography
(shock speed, mass density)
- X-ray Thomson scattering(electron temperature)
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
0
10
20
-2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12
Laser pulse shapes for F_Gbar_Gbar_AAA
inner (TW)
total (TW)
outer (TW)
Backlighter (TW)
La
se
r P
ow
er
(TW
)
Ba
ck
ligh
ter B
ea
ms
(TW
)
Time (ns)
Laser pulse shapes
Time (ns) Po
wer (T
W)
Experimental setup | X-ray radiography and scattering
02/10/14 | Dominik Kraus | NIF and JLF User Group Meeting 2014 | 7
Experimental setup | Target design
Zn backlighter foil
Au radiation shield
Rout = 1150 µm
CH (PaMS)
CH (GDP)
CH + 0.5% Ge
CH + 1% Ge
CH + 0.5% Ge
965 µm
capsule design with graded Ge dopant layer
02/10/14 | Dominik Kraus | NIF and JLF User Group Meeting 2014 | 8
Simulations | Parameter space
A. L. Kritcher et al., HEDP 10, 27 (2014)
Pressure at shock front
02/10/14 | Dominik Kraus | NIF and JLF User Group Meeting 2014 | 9
X-ray radiography | Raw data
N130701 N130103
'me
Self emission at 25.27±0.06 ns
January 03, 2013
July 01, 2013
radius (mm)
Time (ns)
6
4
8
10
2 0 0.5 0.5 1.0 1.0
N130701
22
20
24
26
18
Time (ns)
radius (mm) 0 0.5 0.5 1.0 1.0
02/10/14 | Dominik Kraus | NIF and JLF User Group Meeting 2014 | 10
X-ray radiography | Analysis
- Profile matching to infer µ(r) = ρ(r) σ(r)
- Movement of shock front with time gives shock velocity
- After shock passes marker layer, enclosed mass between shock front and marker layer is known
- Assuming constant density and constant opacity for first time step after passing marker layer: simultaneous density and opacity unfold
- As shock propagates: Using relative comparison to the first time step after passing the marker layer gives full density and opacity profile
D. C. Swift et al., in prep.
shock front
Ge marker
02/10/14 | Dominik Kraus | NIF and JLF User Group Meeting 2014 | 11
X-ray radiography | Results
T. Doeppner et al., in prep.
Inferred opacity
Hugoniot data
2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5
10−3
10−2
10−1
100
101
mass density [g/cm3]
pre
ssure
[G
bar]
SESAME #7592, 24 KSESAME #7592, 298 KNIF (24 K)NIF (298 K)Cauble et al.Barrios et al.Ozaki et al.
02/10/14 | Dominik Kraus | NIF and JLF User Group Meeting 2014 | 12
X-ray scattering | Temperature measurement
- X-rays are scattered from
plasma electrons
- Elastic (Rayleigh): scattering from tightly bound electrons or free electrons which dynamically follow the ion motion
- Inelastic (Compton): scattering from free or weakly bound electrons, mirrors electron velocity distribution ! Te
02/10/14 | Dominik Kraus | NIF and JLF User Group Meeting 2014 | 13
Calibration shot
Zn He-‐α
Cu He-‐α Cu He-‐β
Photon energy 7.4 keV 10 keV
Bragg crystal (HOPG)
(10° offset from DIM- axis) Debris shield
Mounts to gated detector
High-efficiency, gated x-ray spectrometer (7.4 – 10 keV)
Filter pack
X-ray scattering | Spectrometer setup
T. Doeppner et al., in prep.
02/10/14 | Dominik Kraus | NIF and JLF User Group Meeting 2014 | 14
X-ray scattering | Raw data
time-resolved x-ray spectrum
Kme
8.85 ns
X-‐ray ScaOering Signal
Photon energy
9.33 ns
Ungated Hard x-‐ray background
X-‐ray conKnuum emission
Zn source plasma and/or gold L-‐shell emission
streaked radiograph
space
02/10/14 | Dominik Kraus | NIF and JLF User Group Meeting 2014 | 15
8 8.5 9 9.50
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
Photon Energy [keV]
Sca
ttering in
tensi
ty
r=0.05mmr=0.1mmr=0.2mmr=0.3mmr=0.4mmr=0.5mm
X-ray scattering | Analysis: inhomogeneous sample
Different expected X-ray scattering spectra from different radii
0 200 400 600 800 10000
10
20
30
40
radius [µm]
mass
densi
ty [g/c
c]
mass density
0 200 400 600 800 10000
100
200
300
400
radius [µm]
ele
ctro
n tem
pera
ture
[eV
]
electron temperature
02/10/14 | Dominik Kraus | NIF and JLF User Group Meeting 2014 | 16
Kme
Kme
X-ray scattering | Analysis: scattering signal weighting
D. Chapman et al., in prep.
y [µm]
x [µm]
z [µm]
to spectrometer
9 keV radiaKon
02/10/14 | Dominik Kraus | NIF and JLF User Group Meeting 2014 | 17
Kme
Kme
Full analysis: - Calculate radial
scattering spectrum for sample conditions
- Apply weighting maps (3D)
- Ray-tracing of weighted spectra to detector (3D)
- Compare result with measured spectrum
X-ray scattering | Analysis: spectrometer ray-tracing
−8 −7 −6 −5 −4 −3 −2 −1 0 1−1
−0.5
0
0.5
1simulated detector image
x [mm]
y [m
m]
8600 8700 8800 8900 9000 9100 92000
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1lineout
photon energy [eV]
inte
nsi
ty [
a.
u.]
point source1 mm spherical plasma
02/10/14 | Dominik Kraus | NIF and JLF User Group Meeting 2014 | 18
Kme
X-ray scattering | Results
8500 8600 8700 8800 8900 9000 9100 9200 93000
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4x 10
5
photon energy [eV]
inte
nsi
ty
r < 0.12mmr < 0.20mmr < 0.30mmr < 0.40mmr < 0.50mmr < 0.60mmfull sample
8600 8700 8800 8900 9000 9100 92000
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
photon energy [eV]
inte
nsi
ty
measured spectrumcalculation
D. Kraus et al., in prep.
at r = 400 µm (Hydra + SESAME): Te = 60 eV ρ = 5.0 g/cm3 ZC = 3.9
Signal dominated by 300 µm ≤r ≤ 500 µm
02/10/14 | Dominik Kraus | NIF and JLF User Group Meeting 2014 | 19
X-ray scattering | Bremsstrahlung continuum
Photon energy
X-‐ray conKnuum emission
- Slope sensitive to core plasma temperature:
- Fitting slope with LTE bremsstrahlung spectrum ~ exp(-hν/kTe): Te=400 eV
- Fitting slope with Planck spectrum
~ ν3 exp(-hν/kTe): Te=350 eV
0 200 400 600 800 10000
100
200
300
400
radius [µm]
ele
ctro
n tem
pera
ture
[eV
]
electron temperature
7700 7800 7900 8000 810010
7
108
photon energy [eV]
inte
nsi
ty [a. u.]
measured spectrumbremsstrahlung fit
02/10/14 | Dominik Kraus | NIF and JLF User Group Meeting 2014 | 20
CD targets | Hotspot ion temperature via DD fusion
We attempted CD experiment with no ablator
solid CD
CH
1150
µm
Capsule design: CD with a graded Ge doped ablator
Rout = 1150 µm
solid CD
CH
CH + 0.5% Ge
CH + 1% Ge
CH + 0.5% Ge 96
5 µm
solid CD
<1um RMS
Outgassing caused wrinkles
02/10/14 | Dominik Kraus | NIF and JLF User Group Meeting 2014 | 21
CD targets | Hotspot ion temperature via DD fusion
Au
CD CD
He LEH
DD Rate
Tion
DD ra
te [a. u.] T
rad [A. U.]
Laser P
ower [A
.U.]
Time (ns)
Hohlraum Component
2 8 4 6 0
Capsule Component
02/10/14 | Dominik Kraus | NIF and JLF User Group Meeting 2014 | 22
CD targets | Hotspot ion temperature via DD fusion
neutron Time-‐of-‐flight (ns)
PMT ou
tput (V
)
Preliminary
Hohlraum: Tion=6(2)keV Yield=1.29(10)e10
Capsule: Tion=0.5(1)keV Yield=0.1(1)e10
n-‐ToF Data 2-‐component Fit
§ neutron energy measured through time-of-flight over 18 m
§ neutron energy distribution is Doppler-broadened
02/10/14 | Dominik Kraus | NIF and JLF User Group Meeting 2014 | 23
Summary - Developed and fielded an experimental platform for absolute Hugoniot
measurements up to the 1 Gbar regime - Developed dedicated tools for data analysis for this very special and
demanding experimental geometry: - Simultaneous density and opacity unfold of time resolved
radiography images - 3D analysis of X-ray Thomson scattering from inhomogeneous,
mm scale, multi-component dense plasma samples Posters M-15, T-10, T. Doeppner, D. Kraus
- … - First two Gbar equation of state experiments measured Hugoniot of
CH up to 720 Mbar Poster T-01, J. Hawreliak
- Several approaches to experimentally constrain temperature: - X-ray Thomson scattering (also sensitive to ionization state) - DD fusion neutron yield - X-ray self emission spectrum - X-ray self emission absolute intensity Poster M-04, B. Bachmann
02/10/14 | Dominik Kraus | NIF and JLF User Group Meeting 2014 | 24
Outlook
- Hugoniot measurements at lower pressure (connection to NOVA data)
- Repeat of CD experiment
- Further development of temperature diagnostics
- Apply platform to different materials (HDC, …)
- Development dedicated NIF platformfor X-ray Thomson scattering