PRIVATE POLICE Who? Where? Why?

ANNUAL GIVING 1970-71 Report

ALUMNI DAY "The New Consumerism"

From the Dean's Desk:

Freshman Year My freshman year as Dean is past, and I enjoyed it.

The balance sheet of the school's achievements and disappointments, the goals for next year and beyond, these will appear in my Annual Report early in the fall. In past issues of this Journal I have spoken of some of the exciting work of our faculty, the composition and activities of our student body, and the changes in pros­pect as a result of our examination of the Law School curriculum. In this message, however, I would like to take note of the extraordinary, diverse contributions

which you, the graduates of the school, make to our educational enter­prise.

There can be no doubt of the fact that the vitality of the school and its leadership on a na­tional scale would diminish substanti­

ally without the continuous activity and support of its alumni. The Law Advisory Board, chaired by Robert L. Trescher, '37, when I became Dean last July and now by Frederick L. Ballard, '42, stands ready to help the Dean on any subject affecting the school. Individually and as a group, the members of the Board offer judg­ment, based on wisdom, experience and love for the school, that is irreplaceable as a guide to decision­making. During the coming year it is my hope that the Board will meet for further consideration of curricular questions, and for a discussion of Law School policy on such questions as admissions, placement and finance.

The Law Alumni Society, headed by William F. Hyland, '49, is the organized body of our more than 5,000 living alumni. Under the guidance of its Officers and Board of Managers, the Society provides the link between the school and its alumni. The link, forged in opportunities for social contact among the alumni, has become stronger as the Society has provided increasing intellectual ties with the school and the faculty. The seminars on Law Alumni Day have grown in value and interest, and last year the Society added its support to the Owen J. Roberts Memorial Lecture by becoming one of its co-sponsors. A major achievement of the year was the Society's publication of the Alumni Directory, with the writing and publication of a History of the school set as a goal for the near future.

The Pennsylvania Chapter of the Order of the Coif continues to encourage and recognize academic achieve-

2

ment in the student body, and to co-sponsor the Owen J. Roberts Memorial Lecture with which it has been identi­fied from the start of the series. Thomas N. O'Neill, '53, has just succeeded Robert W. Sayre, '40, as Chapter President.

Our alumni activity does not center in Philadelphia alone. Washington, Southern California, New York City, Southern New Jersey, and Delaware have active Law Alumni Clubs which meet and hear speakers at least annually. These clubs provide an important nexus to the school as well as varied opportunities for informal contact and renewal among alumni. It is likely that the coming year will see the beginning of similar clubs in New England and Florida.

The Organized Classes meet to celebrate graduation anniversaries, some more often than others, and on these reunion occasions our graduates revitalize their rela­tionships with the school and enjoy once again the fellowship that began in their days as students.

This issue of the Journal contains the Annual Giving Report for 1970-71, and it is an extraordinary one. While other educational institutions report a decline in alumni support and annual giving, John F. E. Hipple, '26, General Chairman of our Campaign, reports a 1970-71 increase of $8404. over the prior year. This reflects the wide-spread understanding and generosity of our alumni. It also exemplifies the remarkable energy, imagination and dedication of John F. E. Hipple, '26, James W. Macintosh, '26, Chairman of the Annual Giving Executive Committee, and the others who served in leadership roles. It is the fund raised from annual giving that gives us our opportunity to excel, to inno­vate, to continue intellectual lines of contact with our alumni. Without annual giving, there would be no re­search assistance for the faculty; the rich colloquium and book night programs would not exist ; the Law Review and this Journal would cease publishing; library support would be curtailed. I "kicked-off" the Annual Giving Campaign last fall by telling you that the budget for faculty research had been cut by 55%. Now I can report that your financial support has made possible a partial restoration, reducing the cut to 40%. This re­mains severe, and it is my hope that despite inflation and increased costs, your response in the 1971-72 Campaign

(Continued on page 29)

LAW ALUMNI JOURNAL

file UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA

Law ournal FALL 1971

VOLUME VII

NUMBER I

TABLE OF CONTENTS

From The Dean's Desk . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 by Dean Bernard Wolfman, '48

Private Police in Philadelphia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 by Noel Thun

A Student Looks At Curriculum Reform . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 by Joseph H. Cooper, '72

Alumni Day Revisited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6

Professor Kras: Father of the PUD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 by John Michael Willmann, '70

FTC: Kirkpatrick's Growling Watchdog . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 Advertising and Industry Self-Regulation ........................ 10

by Miles Kirkpatrick, '43, FTC Chairman ALUMNI ANNUAL GIVING: 1970-71 REPORT ............. 13

News Notes ................................................... 39 Alumni Notes .............................. .... ............... 40 Faculty & Staff Notes ......................................... 44 Necrology ........ . . .... .... ... ....... ......................... 47 Alumni President's Message ...... .. ... . .......... ..... ........ 48

by William F. Hyland, '49

IN THIS ISSUE:

Fall 1971

A Look At Private Police Page 4

Alumni Day Revisited

Page 6 $

Editor: John Michael Willmann, '70

Contributing Editor: Mary M. Broderick

Alumni Advisory Committee: Robert V. Massey, '31 J. Barton Harrison, '56

Secretary: Katherine Merlin

THE LAW ALUMNI JOURNAL IS PUBLISHED THREE TIMES A YEAR BY THE LAW ALUMNI SOCIETY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA FOR THE INFORMATION AND ENJOY­MENT OF ITS MEMBERS.

PLEASE ADDRESS ALL COM­MUNICATIONS AND MANU­SCRIPTS TO:

The Editor

LAW ALUMNI JOURNAL University of Pennsylvania Law School 3400 Chestnut Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104

Kras: Father Of The PUD

Page 7

Alumni Giving 1970-71 Report Page 13

3

Who Are The 'Private Police' In Philadelphia? Are Cities Becoming Fortified Towns With 'Hired' Guns, Guards?

By Noel Thun Who are the private police? How many of them are

there? Are our cities really becoming fortified towns in which every shopkeeper hires guards and many neigh­borhoods form their own patrols? What kind of ru1es govern this situation? How many private police carry guns? Do they use them? Who controls this or is it uncontrolled?

As soon as one begins to ask such questions about the private police, one is overwhelmed by the extent of public ignorance on the subject. One is also over­whelmed by the extent of the ignorance and the po­tential consequences of that ignorance, of those who are either in the private police business or are frequently involved with them as employers or lawyers or some other comparably related profession.

The variety of answers which one receives to such questions is absolutely incredible.

There are many myths surrounding the subject and these myths will vary to suit the particular interest of the group which perpetuates a particular myth. Security guards themselves, security agency managers, public po­licemen, shopkeepers, lawyers, detectives-every one will have a different interpretation of a ru1e or a differ­ent story about common activities or a different account of procedures or practices.

There have been a few efforts by journalists to reveal some aspects of the situation but these are usually either inaccurate or simply sensational. Written commentaries are virtually non-existent. Neither the literature of the professional police nor the legal literature provide any really extensive studies of these problems and issues.

With this in mind, perhaps some allowances can be made for the absence of specifics. All of the data which is present in this study is open to some question, partly because of the rapidly changing conditions which deter­mine the accuracy of the data and partly because of the absence of information about most aspects of private police activities.

(Continued on page 29)

The Author

4

Miss Thun, 30, is presently employed as a planner in the Office of Court Administration of Philadelphia's Court of Common Pleas. In this position she has been involved with the develop­ment and funding of new programs designed to meet specific needs of the criminal justice system and with the improvement of local procedures and methods.

As a student in City Planning at the University of Pennsylvania, Miss Thun had been involved with numerous projects concerning the problems of law enforcement. In addition to several studies

of the Philadelphia Police Force, a study of private security guards and public housing was completed in 1969 for the Resident Advisory Board of the Philadelphia Housing Authority. This introduction to the field of private guards was the stimulus for a study completed in 1970 under the direction of Dr. Leon Radzinowicz and Dr. Marvin Wolfgang of the Criminology Department of the University of Pennsylvania.

Miss Thun received her B.Sc. from McGill in 1964 and her Master's degree in City Planning from Penn in 1971.

LAW ALUMNI JOURNAL

A Student's View

Must 'Lawyer Education' Be Abstract, Theoretical?

Because of the continuing interest in the problems of curriculum reform at the Law School (Journal, Spring 1969, Fall 1970) the Journal is pleased to present its first statement of the problem from a student's point of view.

The author is a member of the Class of 1972 and his article is excerpted frqm a far-ranging piece entitled "The Law School Way" which he is preparing for the Law Review.

By Joseph H. Cooper, '72 To prepare one to play a role instrumental To be knowledgeable and wise, accurate and sure We need more training in the fundamental Education in the obvious not the obscure Recently, the editor-in-chief of a well-respected law

review related the following account to the members of his Juris prudence class:

"My neighbor asked me if I would draw up liis will. I explained to him that I didn't feel com­petent to do the job. He then asked me if I would handle an accident case he was thinking of bring­ing. I told him that I could be of assistance if and when he was involved in an appellate proceed­ing, but that I really wasn't prepared to represent him in the earlier stages of his suit." It is possible that the individual who made this state­

ment was being far too modest. It is also likely that he could handle both of these "lawyer tasks" competently given enough time. However, the fact that he doesn't think he can or doesn't think he ought to take on such work reflects on his education. His training should not breed insecurity and reluctance.

One might well ask why "taught law" must be tough law; why the orientation of "lawyer education" must be abstract rather than practical, theoretical rather than pragmatic, metaphysical rather than utilitarian, hypo­thetical rather than real. In the words of Professor R. E. Megerry in Law As Taught and Law As Practiced:

"We should not be preparing the law student mainly so he can win the apparently hopeless case but so he can be relied on not to lose a case that ought to be won." Law School is a means to an end. A law school's

function is to train those enrolled to be competent practitioners. A competent practitioner is one who is prepared to efficiently perform "lawyering" functions and to effectively respond to legal problems in a

Fall 1971

"lawyerly" fashion. "Lawyering" as defined by Karl Llewellyn is concerned with the settlement of actual disputes and the prevention of potential ones. The lawyer is a dispute-adjuster and the law is what officials do about disputes. Justice Holmes in The Path of the Law wrote that "law is nothing more pretentious than the prophecies of what courts will do in fact."

"When we study law we are not studying a mystery but a well-known profession. We are studying what we shall want in order to appear before judges, or to advise people in such a way as to keep them out of court ... the object of our study, then, is prediction ... "

The effective "lawyerly' response is an informed pre­diction, a reliable prognosis. Thus, the prospective competent dispute-adjuster must be trained in the art of appraising and apprising.

Jerome Frank quoted with approval the following characterization of the typical graduate of a university law school in Courts on Trial:

"With the practical working of the law he has little or no familiarity. He may come to the bar almost ignorant of how the law should be applied

(Continued on page 34)

THERE WAS A MAN IN OUR TOWN AND HE WAS WONDROUS WISE:

HE JUMPED INTO A BRAMBLE BUSH AND SCRATCHED OUT BOTH HIS EYES­

AND WHEN HE SAW THAT HE WAS BLIND, WITH ALL HIS MIGHT AND MAIN

HE JUMPED INTO ANOTHER ONE AND SCRATCHED THEM IN AGAIN.

Karl Llewellyn

THERE WAS A SCHOLAR IN OUR SCHOOL AND HE WAS WONDROUS WISE

HE JUMPED INTO THE LAWYER'S WORLD SCRATCHED HIS HEAD AND OPENED HIS EYES

AND WHEN HE SAW THAT HE WAS BLIND WITH APPRECIATION AND DISDAIN

HE ASKED A FORMER LAW PROFESSOR WHAT WAS THE PURPOSE OF ALL THE PAIN.

Joseph Howard Cooper

5

Aluinni Look At 'New Consuinerisin' With Two Of Ralph Nader's Raiders

Reitz Contends Education

Is Consumer Enterprise Two recent Law School graduates who now bear the

designation "Nader's Raider" provided a first-hand look at the New Consumerism for those attending Law Alumni Day at the Law School on April 22.

Larry Silverman, '69, and Chris White, '70, described their experiences working for consumer advocate Ralph Nader during the first half of a two-part seminar on consumerism which highlighted the day's events.

A luncheon honoring the quinquennial classes be­tween 1906 and 1971 initiated the day-long activities.

Former Law School professor and current University provost and vice president Curtis R. Reitz, '56, told the luncheon crowd that "education is a consumer en­terprise with a very strange and at the moment difficult dimension."

"We haven't yet found a way to produce education in a mass production way," he said, "but costs continue to spiral at an alarming rate."

Luncheon Speaker Reitz

6

What keeps the University from losing its edge of excellence over other institutions, Reitz said, are "very long and deep ties with the Commonwealth of Pennsyl­vania. As a result, the University is a hybrid organiza­tion: not totally private and it has never been.

"What results," Reitz continued, "is the happy com­bination of the best that a private institution can provide and the best kind of institution for state support."

"Robin Hood, Martin Luther and Paul Revere. . . with a touch of Don Quixote," is how Professor Louis B. Schwartz characterized those who work as Nader's Raiders. Mr. Schwartz moderated the first of two after­noon sessions dealing with consumerism.

Anmore, a West Virginia town with a population of 900 was the setting for Larry Silverman's 'raid' on Union Carbide.

MORE PICTURES ON PAGES 37 & 38 l Silverman began his study of occupational health and

safety in the coal mines by attending a local union meet­ing, and found that the men were only interested in wages and seniority.

"If the union in this little town had missed the im­portant issues, so too had those of us who studied and taught labor law in law school," Silverman observed. "In my research after I left Anmore, I found that there are almost no cases in this kind of thing. The union had done almost nothing not because they were venal, but because they didn't know what to do."

"You give us the facts and we can make a law," Sil­verman concluded-addressing both the alumni and the union.

Chris White, Raider No. 2 on the panel, trains his eye on the Pesticide Registration Division of the Environ­mental Protection Administration, because "they make the decisions."

"One of our first problems with these agencies," he ex­plained, "is trying to find out what they do. They are so secretive that many times we have to cite them the in­formation act cases to obtain what we want.

"Once you have the information, you have to under­stand it ... and then try to impress the public's point of view on the issue. But the companies have all the re­sources," he continued.

"There's absolutely no way to bring the corporate seg­ment of America up to minimal standards of decency unless the law schools become more responsive."

Professor Edward Sparer launched the second session of the seminar by asking "What is the profession and

(Continued on page 36)

LAW ALUMNI JOURNAL

Kras: Father Of The PUD In The U.S.A. Penn Superconsultant Never

Took Formal Property Course

By John Michael Willmann, '70

He is considered by most real estate and property ex­perts to be the "father" of the Planned Unit Development in the United States.

Yet he has never had a formal course in property law. And his interest in the subject did not begin until

after he had been admitted to the bar and found a teaching position at the University of Notre Dame's Law School.

"He", of course, is the pride of the Law School's first­year property course and land-use superconsultant-at­large, Jan Z. Krasnowiecki.

The "Z" stands for Zygmunt, but he is known neither by that name nor by the shorter, more pronounceable Jan.

Instead, to everyone he is "Kras." Professor Kras was born in Poland in 1929 and clings

tenaciously to the East European accent which he has preserved intact in spite of a boyhood spent largely in England, and an Oxford education.

Kras, who fled Poland as a refugee at age 10, came to the United States in 1952 after receiving his B.A. and B.C.L. degrees from Oxford.

After spending two years with the U.S. Army he re­ceived an M.A. from Oxford in 1955 and one year later he was awarded an LL.M. from Harvard.

He was admitted to the Illinois bar that same year and clerked successively for Justice Walter Schaefer of the Illinois Supreme Court and Northern Illinois Fed­eral District Court Judge William J. Campbell.

After a year on the faculty at Notre Dame-and a belated introduction to the vagaries of property law­Kras came to Penn in 1959.

Looking back to his introduction to the world of real estate ("That's what they asked me to teach so I did") Kras admits that he knew vaguely of Shelley's Rule and the fee tail when the call came.

He also admits, with characteristic understatement, that he shortly "began to develop a very substantial interest" in property law.

In a recent interview, squeezed obligingly into a late summer rush to complete still another paper on planned

Fall 1971

unit development, Professor Kras delineated some of his theories on his pet subject.

For openers he lamented the fact that many students shun the property field. "It's unfortunate that it had (traditionally) grown to be an area of the law that stu­dents didn't particularly like . . . after all, property is involved so much in every problem in society," Kras told me with a somewhat disconsolate look.

But then his rubbery visage brightened. All of a sudden it was like first year property all

over again. Not that I went to class that much, but very gray memories still haunt my subconscious in moments of weakness.

For that matter I had Kras for his Housing and Urban Development course, too. But I couldn't tell you the difference between a condominium and a co-op if my J.D. depended on it.

(Continued on page 8)

Hsieh-Chai Available To: Law Alumni of the University of Pennsylvania Gentlemen:

I am sure that each of you is familiar with the Hsieh-Chai statue which was given to the Law School some years ago by a group of alumni and other friends.

Hsieh-Chai (pronounced "Syeh-Jai") is a one­horned goat, the Chinese symbol for a judge. Ap­parently the ancient Chinese chancellor used the goat as a lie detector-when witnesses told con­flicting stories the goat would be introduced into the court and presumably would butt the malefac­tor!

Henry Mitchell, the well-known artist who cre­ated this outstanding work, has agreed to fashion a limited number of signed original models of the statue for the Law Alumni Society, which will make them available to alumni at a price of $350.00 each.

This is a rare opportunity to acquire a Mitchell original at substantially less than its true value and, at the same time, benefit the Society.

If this suggestion appeals to you, please place your order promptly with Harold Cramer, Esquire, 1510 The Fidelity Building, Philadelphia, Pennsyl­vania 191 09-KI 5-4000.

With best regards,

Thomas N. O'Neill, Jr. Secretary

7

Despite the fact that my knowledge of property law and HUD secretary George Romney's one-time presi­dential aspirations shared the same early demise, I tempted fate and continued the interview.

I wrote it all down religiously-which is more than I had done as his student-and I regurgitate it here with affection if not understanding.

Kras is, as noted earlier, the bona-fide father of the PUD in this country.

The PUD, he told me, is at least one answer to the antiquated labyrinth of planning and zoning legisla­tion--circa 1920-that now dominates the real estate scene.

That 1920ish notion that a legislative body should set forth all the rules "into the indefinite future" in ex­acting detail with no chance for the intervention or

Professor Krasnowiecki

further exercise of discretion is all wrong, according to Kras.

"It is," he says, "a concept of land use control that is not consonant with reality."

The two most important fallacies which Kras sees as inherent in this old planning/ zoning notion are that ( 1) communities get "totally swamped" because their 20 year projections of planned growth can be arbitrarily telescoped into a span as short as two years with devel­opment occurring "all at once" and (2) the concept deals "only with physical control ... it has no elements relating to the quality of the developer and his funda­mental capacity to deliver a decent development ... not to mention his capacity to complete" the project.

Assuming a rather professorial air, Kras summed it

8

up. "Most development," he told me, "has occurred not in accord with pre-established rules, but rather with change at the threshold of development."

What results, contends the father of six and some­times artist, is that the old system actually regulates "at a level just below the level at which development can occur." Therefore, development is only really permit­ted "through all kinds of changes"-variances, special exceptions and the like.

With this nasty antediluvian setup-which I have un­doubtedly explained poorly through ignorance, not malice-Kras likes to contrast his baby-the planned unit development.

A combination of residential, commercial and in­dustrial development which stresses a mix of housing for all income levels, the PUD concept changes all the old rules.

No longer does the legislative body set down all rules in advance. Instead it sets down the principles and standards under which plans will be developed­"when development actually materializes."

The stress is on the submission and review of plans­judging the quality of the development at the time the particular developer is presenting his plan.

Kras points out that the old system, which operates only through change at the threshold of development, "causes moderate and low income housing to be left to the last."

For the private developer "it's just not worth spend­ing the money and going through the grief," according to Kras.

It is Kras's hope that since the PUD allows a devel­oper to internalize all his costs, low and moderate in­come housing will prosper in PUD's because the com­munity won't see such development as an extra tax expense.

Reviewing such efforts at mass PUD as Reston, Va. and Columbia, Md. , Kras contrasted the two "new towns." Reston has had major difficulties he says be­cause it omitted low and moderate income housing for its "service" oriented lower income labor force.

Acknowledging many other problems peculiar to Reston and some peculiar to Columbia as well, Kras adds that in general, private capital very often doesn't have the "staying power" to make it with a really big PUD.

"The returns are just too far away," he says with some finality.

Not an ivory tower type himself, Kras admits to many problems with his beloved PUD concept.

He is keenly interested in litigation on the issue of PUD housing mixes which is now pending in Camden, N.J.

There the Camden Legal Services outfit is proceeding against a number of PUD's on the theory that since large scale development is quasi-public the developer is obligated to do something affirmative to counteract dis­crimination because he is in reality "building what amounts to a new community."

(Continued on page 35)

LAW ALUMNI JOURNAL

Federal Trade Commission:

'43 Grad Transforms Agency Into A 'Growling Watchdog'

The New York Times calls it "the new and improved, action-packed, talent-enriched, streamlined Federal Trade Commission (It Scares Advertisers 12 Ways)."

The Wall Street Journal says it has been transformed into a "Growling Watchdog."

Presidential consumer watchdog Virginia Knauer al­ludes to "the great strides made thus far by the dedi­cated leadership .. . "

The Business Lawyer refers to "this Cinderella-like transformation."

Even omnipresent critic Ralph Nader somewhat grudgingly admits that "the Commission is waking up to its responsibilities, which is attributable to a new and more vigilant staff. If they keep up the accelerated pace, the FTC may become a prime recruiting ground for idealistic young lawyers who want to use the au­thority of a democratic government to protect consum­ers and root out anti-competitive practices."

And just who-the-devil is responsible for this bureau­cratic miracle?

None other than Miles W. Kirkpatrick, Law School vintage 1943, late of the Philadelphia super-firm of Morgan, Lewis & Bockius and chairman of the once­dottering FTC for the past year.

And what does Kirkpatrick think about his agency and its phoenix-like renaissance?

With some reserve he told the Antitrust Law Section of the New York State Bar Association that it had his assurance "that the Federal Trade Commission is to­day alive and well."

He added additional assurances that "we are moving into 'high gear' in the task of preserving and promoting competition throughout the American economy; and that we fully intend to be in the vanguard of explora­tion of the new frontiers of antitrust law."

As "major new developments" during his tenure Kirkpatrick cites "new and expanded use of rulemaking processes, public hearings on the impact of television advertising, and documentation of advertising claims."

In a recent speech before the Grocery Manufacturers of America, he outlined current activities of the Federal Trade Commission in these three areas.

Rulemaking proceedings initiated during the past year, he said, include proposed rules to:

Abrogate the holder-in-due course doctrine in con­sumer credit transactions. Require disclosures and warnings concerning phos­phate content in all detergent products. Require the allowance of a three-day cooling-off

Fall 1971

FTC Chairman Kirkpatrick

period in connection with door-to-door sales. Regulate the labeling and advertising power output of amplifiers used in home entertainment products.

Two rules have been issued recently, the chairman said. These: 1) require the posting of minimum octane ratings on gasoline dispensing pumps, and 2) proscribe the unavailability and mispricing of advertising food "specials" by retaii grocery stores. Other proceedings are "in progress" and still others are being considered.

Turning to the second new development, Kirkpatrick called the hearings on television advertising "a fascinat­ing experiment that offers great promise."

"No proposed rule is involved in this matter," he said, "nor is there any purpose to generate litigation. The Commission simply seeks to further educate itself with respect to several complex aspects of television advertis­ing."

The chairman stated that the Commission intends to focus on these four areas:

The impact of TV ads addressed to children. The extent to which TV ads may unfairly exploit desires, fears and anxieties. Technical aspects of the preparation and production

9

of TV commercials that may facilitate deception. Consumers' physical, emotional and psychological responses to advertising, as they may affect the standards by which advertising is judged.

The hearings are scheduled to begin in September at FTC headquarters, with subsequent hearings planned for other major cities.

The third major development-documentation for advertising claims-offers "great promise" for future trade regulation, Kirkpatrick feels.

"This new approach," he told the grocery leaders, "invo~d the issuance of a resolution requiring adver­tisers to submit, on demand by the Commission, all tests, studies or other data available to substantiate advertising claims with respect to the price, safety, per­formance, efficacy or quality of the product advertised. Except for trade secrets or other confidential aspects of the data, all of this material will be made subject to public review and scrutiny."

Chairman Kirkpatrick said the resolution was signi­ficant in two very important ways:

First, public access to all documentation will mean that consumer groups and competitors ... can screen and scrutinize all of the data available, with a view to determining "adequacy" to support claims.

Second- and more important, he said- is the fact that publication of data supporting ad claims will en­hance the role of competition as an effective regulator of advertising practices. It will replace to some extent the need for government intervention with free market incentives in the form of greater consumer awareness and sophistication with regard to ad claims.

Born in Easton, Pa., Kirkpatrick, 52, became chair­man of the FTC on Sept. 15, 1970. He was named by President Nixon to succeed Caspar W. Weinberger after Nixon designated Weinberger deputy director of the Office of Management and Budget.

In 1969 as chairman of the Antitrust Section of the American Bar Association Kirkpatrick headed an ABA commission to study the FTC at Nixon's request. The ABA report, containing myriad recommendations for major reform of the commission was submitted to the President exactly one year prior to Kirkpatrick's ap­pointment as chairman.

A Republican who was not really active in politics and a Princeton grad, Kirkpatrick joined the Morgan firm after completing a tour of duty with the Army in World War II.

The ABA report, which Kirkpatrick will not disown or otherwise gainsay now that the fence to greener pastures has been hurdled, was straightforward in its call for reform of the commission.

"Notwithstanding the great potential of the FTC in the field of antitrust and consumer protection, if change does not occur, there will be no substantial purpose to be served by its continued existence," the report stated.

Looking back at the report Kirkpatrick says: "I think on the whole that the ABA report was a remarkably good blueprint for just what has happened here."

10

Nader, Knauer, the Times, the Wall Street Journal and the Business Lawyer all seem to agree.

Kirkpatrick On:

'Advertising & Industry

Self-Regulation' This article is excerpted from a statement on "Ad­

vertising and Industry Self-Regulation" delivered by Federal Trade Commission chairman Kirkpatrick be­fore the Subcommittee on Activities of Regulatory Agencies Relating to Small Business of the House Select Committee on Small Business on June 18, 1971.

By Miles W. Kirkpatrick, '43 To place this subject in its proper perspective, it

should be noted that concern with the quality of ad­vertising is not a new phenomenon. As early as 1710, one writer objected to advertising which was, in his words, "not at all proper to appear in the works of polite writers." Subsequent critics have not always been so gentle. But, as has recently been pointed out, with the demise of the 12 inch screen and the advent of the "home entertainment center," advertising in recent years has taken on new dimensions.

I bring up this history not to add to it, but rather to illustrate the persistence of the problems, and the elu­siveness of effective solutions. In fairness, it should be noted that there are inherent in advertising a number of characteristics which make it a particularly con­spicuous target for criticism; these are, primarily, its highly visible nature, its obvious impact on consump­tion and living habits, and its susceptibility to ethical and aesthetic criticism. I also should add, at this point, that the benefits which flow from advertising are clear. To go back in history again, another observer in the 1700's, Samuel Johnson, suggested that "The trade of advertising is now so near to perfection that it is not easy to propose any improvements." And while not entirely so satisfied, I should make clear my own point of view.

I believe that advertising plays an essential and productive role in our economy. With new products constantly being introduced, and old products improved, advertising provides the primary means of insuring that the consumer will be aware of competitive alternatives. By widening marketing areas and bringing buyers into contact with sellers, advertising fosters competition and encourages the functioning of a competitive market­place. But, given the vast scope and pervasiveness of today's advertising, it seems inevitable that some meas­ure of questionable advertising will exist.

LAW ALUMNI JOURNAL

I have become increasingly interested in exploring the potentialities of industry self-regulation as a supple­ment to, and perhaps to some extent a substitution for government regulation of advertising. It is perhaps ob­vious that self-regulation cannot completely displace external controls, nor can it be expected to assume the role of government in the regulation of advertising.

It could, however, play a significant role in bolstering and supplementing, clarifying and refining, and bringing pragmatic experience to bear upon existing govern­mental regulation.

Self-regulation is not a new concept, nor one, I might add, which inspires universal confidence. In the advertising industry, I know that trade associations, advertising agencies, and the media themselves are very much involved in various forms of self-regulation. In both theory and practice, however, the concept has a number of inherent limitations, not the least of which is imposed by the antitrust laws. The industry itself recognizes this, and frankly admits that self-regulation has its imperfections and affords no panacea. I hope, however, that these obstacles can be overcome and we can achieve the goal set forth in a recent, far-reaching study of "Advertising in America: The Consumer View":

"Accomplishing the task of making improvements in advertising is a weighty burden. As is the case with business ethics in general, company top man­agement must lead the way, aided and abetted by responsible leaders within the advertising frater­nity." Of course, it must be acknowledged that industry

self-regulation can create as many, perhaps more, prob­lems as it may solve. It has been noted that when in­dustries enact their own private advertising codes, they sometimes mistakenly treat price advertising as an unfair practice. Certain features of industry self -regulation programs, if abused, can become devices for excluding new entrants, boycotting competitors, and otherwise un­dermining the competitive vitality of an industry; on the other hand, these same programs, if properly applied, can contribute substantially to the goal of consumer protection, in terms of product safety, integrity of ad­vertising and greater availability of product information.

It is in the area of enforcement that most self-regula­tion programs confront the legal uncertainties which introduce an element of grave risk into the develop­ment of potentially beneficial programs. In the past, such uncertainty has deterred the planning of such pro­grams, or has greatly impaired their effectiveness.

But on the basis of current legal thought, I would suggest that anyone desiring to organize or sponsor this kind of self-regulation would be wise, as a minimum, to consider the following precautions:

1. While commendable motives may at times be rel­evant to the question of legality, the actual or likely competitive effect of a particular program will usuaiiy be determinative. The best of intentions will not suffice to legitimize a means of self -regulation which has a

Fall 1971

dampening impact upon competition. 2. Due process requirements, includng the right to

notice, hearing, and an appeal or review process, should be scrupulously observed before making any decision or taking any action which adversely affects any in­terested party.

3. The program should avoid, to the extent possible, exclusionary or coercive tactics or effects, and any ex­ercise of practices of that nature would be subject to a severe burden of justification. Group boycotts or con­certed actions which restrain trade are clearly subject to attack. The use of publicity, when wielded as a pre­ventative or punitive measure, may well constitute a form of coercion equaiiy as effective as any boycott.

4. The program should be based on clearly defined standards which give adequate notice of the line of demarcation between what is considered "proper" and that which is considered "improper".

5. The standards should be "reasonable" in terms of their relationship to the legitimate purposes for which the program exists ; they should be sufficiently general to avoid unessential restraints on an individual business­man's imagination and freedom, but precise enough to insure objectivity in their application and impartiality in their enforcement.

6. While the legitimate scope of self-regulation may extend beyond a concern with deception, any program which goes beyond such a point, in an effort to prohibit or discourage other presumed "abuses" or "unfair" practices should proceed with extreme caution.

There exists, of course, a considerable body of law dealing with this question in the broadest terms which provides a starting point for thinking in this area. This case law, however, to give guidance, requires inter­pretation, refinement, and further development. This may be a role appropriate for the Federal Trade Com­mission. The FTC is in an excellent position to give guidance in determining the line of demarcation be­tween the legal and illegal aspects of self-regulation. I believe the Commission can perform a service in faci­litating and encouraging the development of this self­regulatory program.

But let there be no mistake about our intentions or enforcement policy: The Commission cannot condone any plan of self -regulation which, because of defects in its structure or operation, poses any danger to the com­petitive vitality of the affected industry. That, however, does not in the least deter me in my belief that self­regulation has a great potential for benefiting all parties concerned, including, most importantly, the consumer.

By nature, an agency such as the Federal Trade Com­mission is most often involved in telling business what it cannot or should not do. I believe there is a role, and perhaps a very significant one, to be played by the FTC in the planning and development of programs of self-regulation in a manner which would both serve the consumer interests and promote fair competition. An approach available to trade associations may be through cooperation with the Federal Trade Commis-

11

sian in a kind of partnership that would leave enforce­ment efforts in the hands of the government.

Trade associations are increasingly questioning their role as mere "agents" of the industries they represent. They are coming to recognize as a principal role that of being intermediaries between their members and efforts by the government to achieve consumer justice; it also seems to be increasingly recognized that the best interests of an industry as a whole may be fully consistent with the efforts by government and by con­sumer groups to prevent unfair practices on the part of some industry members.

A key role today for trade associations may be to help the government to regulate their industries in a manner that will insure a minimum degree of government in­terference.

However, it would be unrealistic for us to fail to recognize that despite the most vigorous educational efforts on the part of a trade association, some industry members will find it to be profitable to violate the law and engage in unfair practices. The use of such prac­tices by some industry members, as a means of divert­ing business away from the vast majority of law-abiding industry members, is obviously unfair to the other in­dustry members.

In order to defend the competitive position of fair and honest businessmen, as well as to preserve a sub­stantial degree of respect for the law's demands, it is essential that action be taken against the unscrupulous members engaging in such practices. This fact suggests a major way in which trade associations could serve the interests of self-regulation and promote a fair and honest marketing system. Trade associations could develop whatever· machinery may be necessary to moni­tor effectively the practices of their industries, and to detect unfair and deceptive practices as they exist.

Wherever such practices are found to exist, the as­sociation might then assume the role of applicant to the Commission, informing the Commission of all the facts and circumstances which the association believes warrants Commission action.

I am in no position to promise Commission action with respect to every referral or complaint of that nature from an industry trade association, but I think it is fair to say that any complaint received by the Com­mission from an association which has developed a repu­tation for a genuine and active, good faith concern for the reconciliation of industry conduct with the law and consumer welfare would seem likely to receive priority attention from our staff.

In closing, I would make note of the fact that the crunch between the desire and need for self-regulation, and the dictates of the antitrust laws has often been cited as the prime impediment to self-regulation. I sub­mit that, to some extent, and in some cases, these anti­trust problems have been used as a rationalization, rather than a rationale, for lack of action. There has been much discussion of what the antitrust laws pro-

(Continued on page 35)

12

Class of '32: A 'Special' Reunion

The following epistle detailing the exploits of the Class of 1932 comes to the Journal's readers from Herbert N . Shenkin, '32.

The 39th Reunion of the Class of '32 was held on May 21, 1971 , at the Faculty Club, and was attended by some 30-odd Class members and many of their wives. This was a "special" occasion for a Class that has met annually since 1936-no one seems to remember if there were Reunions the first three of the acute Depression years.

"Special?" In the preceding 12 month period, mem­ber Alexander F. Barbieri was appointed to the highest State Court (Pa. Supreme Court), member Max Rosenn was appointed to the highest (in the area) Federal Court (U. S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, and, last but not least, member Israel Packel was appointed Special Counsel (a newly created but long needed position) to Pennsylvania Governor Milton Shapp, with Cabinet rank-though he is said to have refused the private car and chauffeur to which a cabinet officer is entitled!!

Research discloses that not since James Wilson "founded" the Law School in 1790 has any Class, in a 12-month period, had three of its members appointed to such prestigious positions.

Aside from several Common Pleas Judgeships, the Class of 1932 first attracted wide attention when mem­ber John Morgan Davis, now a U. S. District Judge for the Eastern District of Pa., was elected Lieutenant Governor of Pennsylvania, in 1958. But the Class has otherwise staked its claim to distinction. It has had more Judges than any other Law School class (9); it has had more consecutive annual Reunions than any other class (except perhaps the class of 1933); and it seems to be among the longest-lived classes (85 members, or 70 % plus, of the graduating class still present!) .

Also remarkable: A son of one member (Arthur M. Cooper) not only won a Rhodes Scholarship but went on to be first in his class at the Harvard Law School­and President of the Harvard Law Review-surely an all-time first or at least a second for our Law School! This "remarkable" young man, now only 28, married with one child, went on to a Clerkship with Justice Brennan of the U. S. Supreme Court and is presently engaged in legal work in Uganda. Our winter sports­minded member (David J. Speck) has a son who is an Olympic Team Skier. And finally (this is surely without precedent), Class member Bernard Schwartz went into the funeral business shortly after graduation and today heads the oldest Jewish mortuary in the United States!!

LAW ALUMNI JOURNAL

14

LAW OFFICES

0BERMAYER, REBMANN , MAXWELL & HIPPEL

14T H F LOOR PACKARD B UILDING

G . R UHLAND REBMANN , .J R. .JOHN F E. HIPPEL R I CHARD W. THORINGTON H. CLAYTON LOUDERBACK H E RB ER T A . FOGEL WILLIA M G. O'NEI LL

DAVI D F'. M AXW E LL GEORGE B . CLOTHIER F'RANK E. HAHN, JR. WILLIAM .J . F'UCHS ROBERT W. LEES WILLIAM F'. SULLIVAN, JR WALTER R. MILBOURNE

PHILADELPHIA, PA. 19102

AA£A Coo£ 215 LOcusT 8 · 7911

CA B LE " EO M ER ..

FRANKLIN S . ED MONDS

••o•·1••s .JOHN .J . LOM B ARD, .J R LEON J . O B ERMAY E R A . GRANT SPRECHER B ARTON P. .JE N KS m 11 0WA R O H. LE W I S

H . THOMA S FELIX , n ALAN C . KAU F'F'MAN G RAHAM£ P. RICHARDS, JR J AMES LEW I S GR I F'f"ITH

HUGH SCOTT t::OUNS£L

PAUL C . HEINTZ ANTHONY F'. VISCO , JR. P E TE.R M. BRE I TL I NG

L . DAVID WILLISON,:m JOHN L . JENKINS

I-I UG H C. SUTH E RLAND WALTER BE H, n

ROBERT I. WHITELAW

Dean Bernard Wolfman The Law School University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia, Pennsylvan i a 19104

Dear Bernie:

August 13, 1971

It is an honor for me to write on behalf of our 96 volunteer Law School Annual Giving workers and to report that a new record of $130,166 was established in the 1970-71 cam­paign . This represents an increase of $8404 over our previous high total of $121,762 which was set last year.

This shows an increase of 105 contributors over last year and significant increases in the number of William Draper Lewis Associates, Sustaining Fellows of the Century Club and Century Club members.

Our Executive Committee, our Special Gifts Chairmen, our Class Agents, and our Regional Chairmen did outstanding jobs. Our success is wholly attributable to their great ef­forts and to the inspiration which you provided. It is obvious that our alumni, bless 'em, recognize that the Law School needs their support as never before.

To every alumnus who contributed to the campaign, to our dedicated workers, and to you, I want to express my gratitude. It has been a privilege to serve as Law School Annual Giving Chairman, and to work with the wonderful alumni of our Law School.

JFEH:mca

Sincerely,

~ ~F. E. Hippel

LAW ALUMNI JOURNAL

UNIVERSITY of PENNSYLVANIA PHILADELPHIA 19104

The Law School

OFFICE OF THE DEAN

Fall 1971

August 16, 1971

Dear John:

It was a joy to read your final report on the 1970-71 Law School Annual Giving Campaign. You, and every one of your 96 colleagues merit summa cum laude recognition for the work, skill and dedication which produced the highest Law School Annual Giving total ever attained, as well as a substantial increase in the number of contributors.

I hope every alumnus will come to know just what it is that annual giving does for the Law School -- how many programs and activities it sustains. That knowledge would add substantially to the satisfaction they derive from supporting our Law School.

You have done a great job, John. The pleasure I derived during my first year as Dean comes in no small part from my association with you, your colleagues in the campaign, and the many alumni with whom I have had regu­lar contact. My heartfelt thanks go to you, to Jim Macintosh, to each of your co-workers, and to the 1,736 contributors to the 1970-71 campaign.

Sincerely,

Bernard Wolfman

BW:rdb

John F. E. Rippel, Esquire 1418 Packard Building Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19102

15

16

BENJAMIN FRANKLIN

ASSOCIATES

THE BENJAMIN FRANKLIN ASSOCIATES ARE A UNIVERSITY-WIDE GROUP OF ALUMNI AND FRIENDS WHO CONTRIB­UTE ONE THOUSAND DOLLARS OR MORE TO ALUMNI ANNUAL GIVING. LISTED ARE LAW SCHOOL ALUMNI WHO JOINED THE BENJAMIN FRANKLIN ASSOCIATES.

THE FELLOWS OF THE BENJAMIN FRANKLIN ASSOCIATES, THE HIGHEST LEVEL OF CONTRIBUTION IN ALUMNI ANNUAL GIVING, HONORS THOSE WHO CONTRIBUTE FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS OR MORE TO ALUMNI ANNUAL GIVING.

Chairman for the Law School -ROBERT DECHERT, L'21

FELLOW OF THE BENJAMIN FRANKLIN ASSOCIATES Bernard G. Segal, L'31

BENJAMIN FRANKLIN ASSOCIATES

*Anonymous *Philip W. Amram, C'20, L'27 *Gustave G. Amsterdam, C'30, L'33 *Walter W. Beachwood, C'29, L'32 *Edwin H. Burgess, L'14

Sylvan M. Cohen, C'35, L'38 Ralph W. Crowell, W'15, L'l5 Robert Dechert, C'l6, L'21

*L. Leroy Deininger, L'14 in memory of

Hon. Samuel W. Pennypacker *Richard M. Dicke, L'40 *Aaron M. Fine, C'43, L'48

Max Freedman, W'23, LNA *Jacques H. Geisenberger, L'27

Estate of

*Donald W. Hedges, W'43, L'47 *Hon. James F. Henninger, L'l5,

Estate of *John F. E. Hippe!, C'23, L'26 Charles M. Justi, W'22, L'27

*Harold E. Kohn, C'34, L'3 7 Robert C. Ligget, W'13, L'17

*Robert L. Lingelbach, W'29, L'34 *John T. Macartney, W'44, L'49 *W. James Macintosh, W'22, L'26 *Baldwin Maull, L'25 *John L. McDonald, L'40 J. Wesley McWilliams, W'15, L'15

*Albert B. Melnik, C'24, L'27 *Leon J. Obermayer, W'08, L'08 *Lipman Redman, C'38, L'41

Stuart B. Glover, W'25, L'28 *Moe H. Hankin, L'37 *John F. Headly, L'27

Edmund H. Rogers, W'09, L'l2 *Maurice B. Saul, C'07, L'05 *Ernest Scott, C'25, L'29

*Wendell E. Warner, L'24

* To recognize those whose gifts were allocated solely to the Law School.

WILLIAM DRAPER

LEWIS ASSOCIATES

TO HONOR THE MEMORY OF WILLIAM DRAPER LEWIS, DEAN OF THE LAW SCHOOL FROM 1896 TO 1914, THE WIL­LIAM DRAPER LEWIS ASSOCIATES WAS FOUNDED IN RECOGNITION OF CONTRI­BUTIONS OF FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS OR MORE TO LAW SCHOOL ANNUAL GIVING.

Chairman-HARRY E. SPROGELL, L'35

William B. Arnold, L'29 Martin J. Aronstein, L'65 Hon. Francis Shunk Brown, Jr., L'16 Barton E. Ferst, L'44 Joseph P. Flanagan, Jr., L'52

G. William Shea, L'36

Robert McCall Gilkey, L'l5 Leon C. Holt, Jr., L'51 Daniel Lowenthal, L'31 Desmond J. McTighe, L'25 Marvin Schwartz, L'49

LAW ALUMNI JOURNAL

0 ~NTURY

CENTURY CLUB MEMBERSHIP IS AWARDED JN RECOGNITION OF CONTRIBUTIONS OF ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS OR MORE TO LAW SCHOOL ALUMNI ANNUAL GIVING.

THE SUSTAINING FELLOWS OF THE CEN­TURY CLUB ARE THOSE MEMBERS WHO EXCEED THE BASIC MEMBERSHIP REQUIRE­MENTS AND ASSIST THE SCHOOL BY CON­TRIBUTING TWO HUNDRED AND FIFTY DOLLARS OR MORE.

Alvin C. Ackerman, L'57 Alexander B. Adelman, L'31 Louis D. Apothaker, L'56 William W. Atterbury, Jr., L'50 Frank B. Baldwin, III, L '64 Henry W. Balka, L'26 Augustus S. Ballard, L'48 Frederic L. Ballard, L'42 J. William Barba, L'50 Samuel Bard, L'36 Ralph M. Barley, L'38 Jay D. Barsky, L'45 John G. Bartol, Jr., L'52 Max M. Batzer, L'33 Lewis B. Beatty, Jr., L'49 Robert M. Beckman, L'56 Harry P. Begier, Jr., L'64 Hon. John C. Bell, Jr., L' I 7 Joseph Bell, L'37 Martin M. Bell, L'48 Robert K. Bell, L'24 J. Glenn Benedict, L'27 Milton Berger, L'29 Leonard J. Bernstein, L'34 Marshall A. Bernstein, L'49 Franklin H. Berry, L'28 John Bertman, L'57 John H. Bertolet, L'31 Claire G. Biehn, L'37 Stanley W. Bluestine, L'54 Francis H. Bohlen, Jr., L'21 Richard L. Bond, L'56 Bernard M. Borish, L'43 Clifford M. Bowden, L'28 John P. Bracken, L'39 Christopher Branda, Jr., L'51 Joseph Brandschain, L'28 Samuel A. Breene, L'40 Herbert Brener, L'4l John W. Brock, Jr., L'59 Sol Brody, L'26 Gerald Broker, L'59 Hon. Hazel H. Brown, L'24 Herman M. Buck, L'35 Joseph W. P. Burke, L'39

Fall 1971

SUSTAINING FELLOWS OF THE CENTURY CLUB

S. Samuel Arsht, L'34 Hon. Alexander F. Barbieri, L'32 Robert M. Bernstein, L'14 Samuel A. Blank, L'32 William C. Bodine, L'32 Raymond J. Bradley, L'47 Mitchell Brock, L'53 Richard P. Brown, Jr., L'48 E. Calvert Cheston, L'35 Marvin Comisky, L'41 Stuart Coven, L'51 Clive S. Cummis, L'52 Hon. John Morgan Davis, L'32 Guy G. deFuria, L'28 Park B. Dilks, Jr., L'51 Bernard Eskin, L'35 Eugene C. Fish, L'34 Frank H. Gelman, L'35 Kenneth W. Gemmill, L'35 John R. Gibbel, L'64 Louis J. Goffman, L'35 Edward M. Harris, Jr., L'49 Robert A. Hauslohner, L'50 William S. Rudders, L'29

William F. Hyland, L'49 William B. Johnson, L'43 Lester E. Kabacoff, L'37 Edward A. Kaier, L'33 Lewis Kates, L'59 Bernard V. Lentz, L'36 W. Barclay Lex, L'12 William B. Mcintosh, L'17 David 0. Miller, L'60 Paul A. Mueller, Jr., L'55 Philip F. Newman, L'17 Thomas A. O'Boyle, L'40 Michael A. Orlando III, L'58 Gilbert W. Oswald, L'34 Charles C. Parlin, Jr., L'49 G. Ruhland Rebmann, Jr., L'22 Edwin P. Rome, L'40 John N. Schaeffer, Jr., L'37 Mrs. Sylvia Schorr, LNA Mr. Dorrance Sexton, LNA Robert M. Shay, L'61 Robert W. Valimont, L'49 Stewart E. Warner, L'27 Morris L. Weisberg, L'47

Dean Bernard Wolfman, L'48

Chairman-HAROLD CRAMER, L'51

CENTURY CLUB MEMBERS

Thomas J. Burke, L'49 Walter M. Burkhardt, L'14 John Butterworth, L'53 J. Russell Cades, L'28 J. Scott Calkins, L'52 Robert J. Callaghan, L'33 Watson S. Campbell, L'42 fames D. Carpenter, L'OS Curtis C. Carson, Jr., L'46 Benjamin E. Carter, L'58 Louis J. Carter, L'49 Meyer L. Casman, L'17 Harry Cassman, L' 12 Sidney Chait, L'33 Keron D. Chance, L'38 Frederick J. Charley, L'41 Morris Cheston, L'28 Dr. Roland J. Christy, L'34 J. Horace Churchman, L'34 Hon. Joseph S. Clark, Jr., L'26 Roderick T. Clarke, L'36 William N. Clarke, L'42 Mr. Samuel P. Cloud, LNA

in memory of EdwardS. Lower, L'29

W. Frederic Colclough, L'30 William H. Conca, L'34 Harold J. Conner, L'32 George H. Conover, Jr., L'52 Charles R. Cooper, Jr., L'47 Jerome J. Cooper, L'51 Samuel B. Corliss, L'49 Americo V. Cortese, L'29 Henry B. Cortesi, L'63 Robert T. Cottom, L'41 J. Harry Covington III, L'38 Stephen A. Cozen, L'64 Cassin W. Craig, L'49 Harold Cramer, L'51 Albert J. Crawford, Jr., L'39 Fred B. Creamer, L'3 I Samuel S. Cross, L'49 Edward I. Cutler, L'37 The late Herman S. Davis, L'41

David J. Dean, L'27 Daniel DeBrier, L'29 Charles S. Delaney, L'31 Raymond K. Denworth, Jr., L'61 John M. Desiderio, L'66 Harry T. Devine, L'36 Samuel Diamond, L'55 Ralph B. D'lorio, L'49 M. Carton Dittmann, Jr., L'38 James B. Doak, L'35 Robert J. Dodds, Jr., L'40 Robert J. Dodds III, L'69 Robert B. Doll, L'47 Charles H. Dorsett, L'35 Albert G. Driver, L'47 Herbert G. DuBois, L'36 John F. Dugan II, L'60 Wayland F. Dunaway III, L'36 Murray S. Eckell, L'59 Nathan L. Edelstein, L'28 Joseph L. Ehrenreich, L'16 Ron. Jay H. Eiseman, L'33 WilliamS. Eisenhart, Jr., L'40 Mr. Robert R. Endicott, LNA Neil G. Epstein, L'65 John A. Erickson, L'56 Leonard L. Ettinger, L'38 Harold Evans, L'IO Neil K. Evans, L'64 John K. Ewing III, L'27 Samuel E. Ewing, L'30 William E. Ewing, L'65 Richard J. Farrell, L'4 I Nelson P. Fegley, L' 11 Albert J. Feldman, L'53 Joseph G. Feldman, L'26 Anthony G. Felix, Jr., L'34 Howard W. Fineshriber, L'33 Ron. Thomas K. Finletter, L'20 Joseph M. First, L'30 Joseph H. Flanzer, L'33 Peter Florey, L'50 Herbert A. Fogel, L'52 Caleb Foote, L'53

17

CENTURY CLUB Continued

Jefferson B. Fordham Leon S. Forman, L'39 Michael D. Foxman, L'61 Hon. Michael V. Franciosa, L'58 Bernard Frank, L'38 Stanley Frank, L'58 Edward P . Frankel, L'36 Mark A. Frankel, L'70 James A. Freyer, L'65 Calvin J. Friedberg, L'35 Harry Friedman, L'27 Edward H. P. Fronefield, L'24 Fred T. Fruit, L' 11 Carl W. Funk, L'25 S. Harry Galfand, L'45 Hon. IsaacS. Garb, L'56 Marvin Garfinkel, L'54 Milton B. Garner, L'36 Morris B. Gelb, L'29 Franklin B. Gelder, L'29 Lewis M. Gill, L'36 M. Kalman Gitomer, L'50 Howard Gittis, L'58 Thomas P. Glassmoyer, L'39 Fred P. Glick, L'35 Henry J. Goldberg, L'33 Hyman Goldberg, L'37 Samuel A. Goldberg, L'23 Larry J. Goldsborough, L'57 Stephen M. Goodman, L'65 Mr. Lothar H. Goold, LNA Joseph K. Gordon, L'51 Morton S. Gorelick, L'54 Arthur R. Gorr, L'59 Joseph A. Grazier, L'28 Oliver F. Green, Jr. , L'51 Harry A. Greenberg, L'38 Robert W. Greenfield, L'30 Elihu A. Greenhouse, L'31 Harold D. Greenwell, L'27 W. Edward Greenwood, Jr. , L'29 William P. Gregory, Jr., L'40 Hon. George W. Griffith, L'23 Miss Mary E. Groff, L'32 Hon. Bernard M. Gross, L'59 Bernard M. Guth, L'58 Paul D. Guth, L'56 Frank E. Hahn, Jr., L'35 Rayner M. Hamilton, L'61 Louis S. Hankin, L'37 William D. Harkins, L'22 J. Barton Harrison, L'56 Jesse G. Heiges, L'38 Paul W. Heil, L'66 Carl E. Heilman, L'39 Col. Edmond H. Heisler, L'51 Norman M. Reisman, L'57 Carl J. W. Hessinger, L'40 Stewart A. Hirschhorn, L'66 Irving M. Hirsch, L'55 Donald E. Hittle, L'42 Hon . T. Linus Hoban, L'l7 Edward B. Hodge, L'31 Abraham Hofferman, L'34 The late Hubert J. Horan, Jr. , L' 11 Andrew Hourigan, Jr., L'40 Richard A. Huettner, L'52 Gilbert R. Hughes, L'15 Philip L. Hummer, L'61 James Hunter III, L'39 Hon . Daniel H. Huyett III, L'48 Thomas M. Hyndman, L'll Mr. and Mrs. Sam Jablon, LNA Dr. and Mrs. Murray B. Jacobson, LNA Myron Jacoby, L'31 Paul L. Jaffe, L'50 Hon. Robert B. Johnson, L'27 Thomas McE. Johnston, L'24 John P. Jordan, L'28 Ben F. Kaito, L'54

18

Henry H. Kaplan, L'50 John 0. Karns, L'57 Allan Katz, L'60 Solomon Katz, L'48 Ernest R. Keiter, L'l9 Hon. Bernard J. Kelley, L'26 William F. Kennedy, L'29 Joseph H. Kifer, L'29 Richard Kirschner, L'57 David Kittner, L'51 John P . Knox, L'53 Charles G. Kopp, L'60 Mr. and Mrs. Joseph Koppelman, LNA Bernard J. Korman, L'55 Meyer Kramer, L'44 Otto Kraus, Jr., L'08 Herman H. Krekstein, L'22 Goncer M. Krestal, L'57 Hon. Gregory G. Lagakos, L'38 Albert W. Laisy, L'59 William W. Lanigan, L'57 George C. Laub, L'36 Samuel S. Laucks, Jr. , L'42 Charles H . Laveson, L'57 Henry W. Lavine, L'60 Nathan Lavine, L'31 Samuel P. Lavine, L'28 James F. Lawler, L'51 Arthur W . Leibold, Jr., L'56 Anthony S. Leidner, L'61 William T. Leith, L'41 Dr. A. Leo Levin, L'42 Harvey B. Levin, L'48 Hon. Herbert S. Levin, L'31 Leonard Levin, L'50 Russell R. Levin, L'47 Hon. Louis E. Levinthal, L' 16 A. Harry Levitan, L'35 Arthur Levy, L'55 Paul G. Levy, L'61 William J. Levy, L'64 Edward J. Lewis, L'62 S. Cyrus Lewis, L'31 Herbert M. Linsenberg, L'51 William Lipkin, L'33 Louis Lipschitz, L'27 Arthur Littleton, L'20 S. Gerald Litvin, L'54 H. Allen Lochner, L'39 SamuelS. Logan, Jr., L'4 1 Edwin P. Longstreet, L'15 David P. Loughran, L'62 Carl P . Lundy, L'33 Harry K. Madway, L'36 D. Arthur Magaziner, L' 14 Elias Magi!, L'30 Wm. Morris Maier, L'35 DavidS. Malis, L'll Richard B. Malis, L'40 Robert H. Malis, L'47 Frank H. Mancill, L'l4 Alan W. Margolis, L'58 Robert Margolis, L'48 Albert J . Marks, L'17 Francis E. Marshall, L'48 Ralph S. Mason, L' 39 William L. Matz, L'29 David F. Maxwell, L'24 Robert F. Maxwell , L'48 Milford L. McBride, Jr. , L'49 John F. McCarthy, Jr., L'48 Daniel J. McCauley, Jr., L'41 Thomas McConnell III, L'22 Hon. Barron P. McCune, L'38 Jack J. McDowell, L'31 Walter P . McEvilly, L'39 Stephen J. McEwen, Jr. , L'57 George W. McKee, Jr., L'34 Edward M. Medvene, L'57 Thomas F. Meehan, Jr. , L'54 Edward B. Meredith, L'51 Leon I. Mesirov, L'34

Charles W. Miles III, L'36 A. Arthur Miller, L'34 George J. Miller, L'51 William E. Miller, Jr. , L'49 Burton M. Mirsky, L'59 Charles J. Moos, L'41 Thomas R. Morse, Jr. , L'51 Jerrold V. Moss, L'57 John T. Mulligan, L'59 Robert E. Newcomb, Jr., L'42 Alexander L. Nichols, L'31

in memory of Frank E. Gordon

Eugene A. Nogi, L'32 Roderick G. Norris, L'53 Philip S. Nyman, L'62 David W. O'Brien, L'49 James E. O'Connell, L'51 Harris Ominsky, L'56 Thomas N. O'Neill, Jr., L'53 Isidor Ostroff, L'30 George Ovington, Jr. , L'07 Israel Packel, L'32 HaigH. Pakradooni, Jr. , LNA Marion D. Patterson, Jr. , L'52 Henry N. Paul, Jr. , L'25 Henry D. Paxson, Jr., L'29 Robert E. Penn, L'60 Mr. & Mrs. HenryS. Perry, LNA

in memory of Edward S. Lower, L'29

Lawrence M. Perskie, L'49 Marvin D . Perskie, L'48 Morris Pfaelzer II, L'38 John C. Phillips, L'39 Harry Polikoff, L'31 Herman I. Pollock, L'27 Robert C. Porter, L'39 Harry A. Poth, Jr., L'36 Franklin Poul, L'48 Herman B. Poul, L'38 Howard I. Powell, L' I 6 Calvin K. Prine, L'53 Samuel F. Pryor III, L'53 Louis C. Pulvermacher, L'51 William J. Purcell, L'54 Alfred W . Putnam, L'47 R. Stewart Rauch, Jr. , L'41 Pace Reich , L'54 Samuel J. Reich, L'60 G. Hayward Reid , L'48 Curtis R. Reitz, L'56 Russell R. Reno, Jr., L'57 Hon. Augustine A. Repetto, L'3 I Paul H. Rhoads, L'31 Grover C. Richman, Jr., L'35 Jacob S. Richman, L'31 Victor J. Roberts, Jr. , L'37 Edward Robin, L'60 Herman M. Rodgers, L'47 Richard M. Rosenbleeth , L'57 David H. Rosenbluth, L'33 Harold S. Rosenbluth. L'50 Hon. Max Rosenn, L'32 John Ross, L'35 Michael J. Rotko, L'63 William Rowe, L'27 Alexander N. Rubin, Jr., L'50 Hanley S. Rubinsohn, L'38 William M. Ruddock, L'25 John J. Runzer, L'58 HenryS. Ruth, Jr., L'55 Marshall A. Rutter, L'59 Charles Sabin, L'47 Maurice Saeta, L'17 Hon. Herbert W . Salus, Jr. , L'48 W. Albert Sanders, L'31 Alex Satinsky, L'37 Hon . Edwin H. Satterthwaite, L'40 H. James Sautter, L'l4 Joseph H. Savitz, L'58 Hon. Ralph F . Scalera, L'55

LAW ALUMNI JOURNAL

CENTURY CLUB Continued

James W. Scanlon, L'30 Henry W. Scarborough, Jr., L'36 Carl W. Schneider, L'56 Andrew J. Schroder II, L'30 Lloyd J. Schumacker, L'30 Louis B. Schwartz, L'35 Murray M. Schwartz, L'55 Emanuel G. Scoblionko, L'34 W. Frazier Scott, L'39 Bernard L. Segal, L'59 Mrs. Anita R. Shapiro, L'65 David V. Shapiro, L'44 Milton H. Shapiro, L'40 Mrs. Norma Levy Shapiro, L'51 William J. Sharkey, L'58 W. Simms Sharninghausen, L'39 Hon. Charles A. Shea, Jr., L'36 Stanford Shmukler, L'54 John A. Shrader, L'48 David S. Shrager, L'60 Morris M. Shuster, L'54 Joel D. Siegel, L'66 Nathan Silberstein, L'33 Howard A. Silver, L'30 John P. Sinclair, L'39 Jack Sir ott, L' 52 Mrs. Dolores K. Sloviter, L'5.6 Alan J. Smith, L'29 Hon. Arnold D. Smorto, L'38 Edward L. Snitzer, L'55 Alvin L. Snowiss, L'55 D. Hays Solis-Cohen, L' 10 Elvin R. Souder, L'42 Oscar F. Spicer, L'59

PARENTS Max Freedman, Chairman Mr. Robert R. Endicott Mr. Lothar H. Goold Mr. & Mrs. Sam Jablon Dr. & Mrs. Murray B. Jacobson Mr. & Mrs. Charles H. Keehn Mr. & Mrs. Joseph Koppelman Mr. & Mrs. Anthony C. Olowinski Mr. & Mrs. William N. Papian Mr. & Mrs. Jesse Ross Dr. Harold Sanders Mr. Dorrance Sexton Mr. & Mrs. Herbert D. Sterns Mr. Joseph Weinstock

NON ALUMNI Anonymous Mr. Samuel P. Cloud Mr. & Mrs. Charles David Professor Jefferson B. Fordham Mrs. Elizabeth M. Greenfield Miss Helen Herrmann Mr. Wendell C. Kelley Dr. Jane C. Kronick Mr. Howard H. Lewis Miss Joyce Lewis Miss Dolores G. Norton Mr. HaigH. Pakradooni, Jr. Mr. & Mrs. Henry S. Perry Miss Jeanne C. Pollock Mr. Allen G. Powell Miss Elizabeth C. Preston Miss Margaret Ryan Mr. Louis Schneiderman Mrs. Sylvia Schorr Miss Ruth 0. Stallfort Miss Lois R. Taber

*deceased

Fall 1971

Joseph H. Stanziani, L'55 Sidney S. Stark, L'32 Lee N. Steiner, L'49 Hon. James L. Stern, L'33 Stanley P. Stern, L'53 J. Tyson Stokes, L'31 J. Pennington Straus, L'35 James A. Strazzella, L'64 C. Leo Sutton, L'27 Marc L. Swartzbaugh, L'61 Edward J. Swotes, L'17 Kenneth Syken, L'52 Harry A. Takiff, L'37 Myles H. Tanenbaum, L'57 L. Gerald Tarantino, Jr., L'58 Louis M. Tarasi, Jr., L'59 Howard W. Taylor, Jr., L'39 William J. Taylor, L'52 S. Robert Teitelman, L'41 William Thatcher, L'54 George W. Thompson, L'48 Caspar B. Townsend, Jr., L'49 Charles C. Townsend, L'27 William F. Trapnell, L'51 Robert L. Trescher, L'37 RobertS. Trigg, L'51 Edmund P. Turtzo, L'41 Frederick VanDenbergh, Jr., L'37 Lawrence R. VanDeusen, L'33 Charles B. P. Van Pelt, L'49 Harry P. Voldow, L'31 Ernest R. VonStarck, L'3 7 Theodore Voorhees, L'29 Murray J. Waldman, L'52 Mrs. Virginia B. Wallace, L'50 John A. Walter, L'60

CONTRIBUTORS Daniel J. Walsh's Sons, Ins. Mr. 'Edwin F. Washburn Dr. Julius Wishner

CLASS OF 1903 Morris Wolf

CLASS OF 1904 Walter C. Longstreth

CLASS OF 1905 Maurice B. Saul Harold S. Shertz

CLASS OF 1906 Robert J. Eby

CLASS OF 1907 George Ovington, Jr.

CLASS OF 1908 Isaac Ash James D. Carpenter Otto Kraus, Jr. Leigh M. Morss Leon J. Obermayer Arthur M. Widdows

CLASS OF 1909 Russell Wolfe

CLASS OF 1910 Conway W. Dickson Harold Evans Sidney Loewenstein D. Hays Solis-Cohen Philip Sterling

CLASS OF 1911 Nelson P. Fegley Fred T. Fruit *Hubert Horan, Jr. Thomas M. Hyndman Michael Korn David S. Malis C. Edward Paxson David E. Rattin

CLASS OF 1912 Harry N. Brenner Harry Cassman W. Barclay Lex Edmund H. Rogers Wilton W. Webster

CLASS OF 1913 Edward T. Curry J. Julius Levy Samuel R. Rosenbaum

CLASS OF 1914 J. Charles Adams Robert M. Bernstein Edwin H. Burgess Walter M. Burkhardt L. Leroy Deininger Domenic Furia D. Arthur Magaziner Frank H. Mancill Mark T. Milnor H. James Sautter

CLASS OF 1915 Justin S. Bamberger Hon. Robert V. Bolger

Guy E. Waltman, L'29 Paul F . Ware, Jr., L'69 Michael Waris, Jr., L'44 Mrs. Helen Moran Warren, L'30 Gilbert Wasserman·, L'61 Wilton W. Webster, L'12 Jerome B. Weinstein, L'34 Lewis Weinstock, L'40 Joseph Weintraub, L'28 H. John Weisman, Jr., L'42 Morris Weisman, L'27 Aaron Weiss, L'16 Robert T. Weniger, L'38 Carroll R. Wetzel, L'30 Edward S. Weyl, L'28 David H. Wheeler, L'61 Thomas R. White, Jr., L'36 William White, Jr., L'38 Thomas E. Wilcox, L'48 Mervin M. Wilf, L'55 Hon. Roy Wilkinson, Jr., L'39 William C. Wise, L'33 Morton Witkin, L'17 Marvin M. Wodlinger, L'60 Morris Wolf, L'03 Paul A. Wolkin, L'41 Frederick D. Wood, L'60 William A. Wyatt, L'53 Sidney T. Yates, L'54 H. Albert Young, L'29 John R. Young, L'30 Norman P. Zarwin, L'55 Judah Zelitch, L'27 Ronald Ziegler, L'60 David B. Zoob, L'27 Richard V. Zug, L'32

Ralph W. Crowell R. McCall Gilkey David D. Goff Estate of Hon. James F. Henninger Gilbert R. Hughes Edwin P. Longstreet J. Wesley McWilliams Thomas Reath

CLASS OF 1916 Hon. Francis Shunk Brown, Jr. Joseph L. Ehrenreich Harry G. Lenzner Hon. Louis E. Levinthal Hon. Thomas M. Lewis Howard I. Powell Thomas E. Shipley Moses J. Slonim Paul C. Wagner Aaron Weiss

CLASS OF 1917 Hon. John C. Bell, Jr. Meyer L. Casman Hon. T. Linus Hoban Robert C. Ligget Albert J. Marks William B. Mcintosh Marshall H. Morgan Philip F. Newman Mrs. Rose Lerner Perlman Maurice Saeta Edward J. Swotes Morton Witkin

CLASS OF 1918

Ernest N. Votaw

19

CLASS OF 1919 Ernest R. Keiter

CLASS OF 1920 Hon. Harold L. Ervin Hon. Thomas K. Finletter Arthur Littleton Harry Polish Eugene H. Southall Donald H. Williams

CLASS OF 1921 Samuel J. Becker Francis Bohlen, Jr. Robert Dechert Armand L. Koethen Clarence G . Myers John Russell, Jr. Isadore S. Wachs William I. Woodcock, Jr.

CLASS OF 1922 Franklin H. Bates W. Meade Fletcher, Jr. William D. Harkins Herman H. Krekstein Thomas McConnell III Edward A. G. Porter G. Ruhland Rebmann, Jr. Richard W. Thorington Arthur B. Van Buskirk Miss Sybil U. Ward Allen H. White

CLASS OF 1923 Samuel A. Goldberg Cadmus Z. Gordon, Jr. Hon. George W. Griffith Holman G. Knouse Hon. Felix Piekarski

CLASS OF 1924 Robert K. Bell Hon. Hazel H. Brown Mrs. Ida Oranovich Creskoff Edward P. Fronefield Thomas McE. Johnston David F . Maxwell Philip S. Polis Wendell E. Warner

CLASS OF 1925 Meyer E. Cooper Francis I. Farley Carl W. Funk Samuel R. Greenwald Charles P. Larkin, Jr. Abram L. Lischin Baldwin Maull Desmond J. McTighe Henry N. Paul, Jr. William M. Ruddock Walter Seiler Geoffrey S. Smith Hon. J. Colvin Wright

CLASS OF 1926 Henry W. Balka Julius C. Baylinson Sol Brody Hon. Joseph S. Clark, Jr. Joseph G. Feldman Rev. Edward B. Guerry John F. E. Hippel Hon. Bernard J. Kelley W. James Macintosh Frank M. Travaline, Jr. *deceased

20

CLASS OF 1927 Herman P. Abramson Philip W. Amram Robert H. Arronson J. Glenn Benedict Alvin W. Carpenter David J. Dean Herman Eisenberg John K. Ewing III Harry Friedman Estate of Jacques H. Geisenberger Mrs. Jacques H. Geisen berger

In memory of Jacques H. Geisen berger

Hon. Emil F. Goldhaber Harold D. Greenwell John F. Headly Harold H. Hoffman Hon. Robert B. Johnson Charles M. Justi Louis Lipschitz Albert B. Melnik Thomas P. Mikell Herman I. Pollock Rev. Elwood F. Reeves, Jr. William Rowe Raymond Saltzman Hon. Frederick Smillie C. Leo Sutton Charles C. Townsend Stewart E. Warner Morris Weisman W. Nelson West John H. Wharton Judah Zelitch David B. Zoob

CLASS OF 1928 Franklin H. Berry Clifford M. Bowden Mrs. Esther G. Brandschain JoseJ?h Brandschain J. Russell Cades William V. Cherry Morris Cheston Guy G. DeFuria Frederick W. Deininger Nathan L. Edelstein Stuart B. Glover Joseph A. Grazier Martin Greenblatt Arthur M. Harrison Jesse Hyman Louis Ingber John P. Jordan Harrison G. Kildare Samuel P. Lavine Hon. Paul S. Lehman Abraham Levin Thomas R. MacFarland, Jr. George M. Miller, Jr. James A . Montgomery, Jr. Benson N. Schambelan A. Allen Simon Leon Sobel Joseph Weintraub Edward S. Weyl

CLASS OF 1929 William B. Arnold Milton Berger Samuel R . Block Stanley B. Cooper Americo V. Cortese Daniel De Brier Lawrence E. Frankel Morris B. Gelb Franklin B. Gelder Walter E. Greenwood, Jr. Gilbert G. Harris

William S. Hudders Joseph G. Jackson William F. Kennedy Joseph H. Kifer William L. Matz *Nathan Miller Simon Mustokoff Henry D. Paxson, Jr. Sidney Schulman Ernest Scott Louis Sherr Alan J. Smith Theodore Voorhees Guy E. Waltman W. Wyclif Walton H. Albert Young

CLASS OF 1930 Samuel A. Armstrong George M. Brodhead W. Frederick Colclough George C. Denniston Samuel E. Ewing Joseph M. First Edward W. Furia Sydney Gerber J. Russell Gibbons Samuel E. Gilbert Robert W. Greenfield Stanley Jakubowski Joseph Kaplan Herman Krakovitz Hon. I. Harry Levin Samuel Lichtenfeld Elias Magil Clarence Mesirov Hon. Dawson H. Muth Isidor Ostroff James W. Scanlon Andrew J. Schroder II Lloyd J. Schumacker Howard A. Silver Norman Snyder Mrs. Helen Moran Warren Fraley N. Weidner, Jr. Carroll R. Wetzel John R. Young

CLASS OF 1931 Alexander B. Adelman Nathan Agran Philip I. N. Alperdt Joseph Atlas Arthur W. Bean Kellogg W. Beck John H. Bertolet Isadore J. Brodsky Fred B. Creamer Preston B. Davis Charles S. Delaney Natt M. Emery, Jr. Edward L. Frater Theodore R. Gardner Elihu A. Greenhouse Samuel Handloff Edward S. Heins *Knox Henderson Edward B. Hodge Myron Jacoby Edward I. Jaffe Israel I. Jamison Alexander Katzin George D. Kline Ashby M. Larmore Nathan Lavine Albert Laub Hon. Herbert S. Levin Abraham J. Levinson S. Cyrus Lewis Daniel Lowenthal John B. Martin

Robert V. Massey, Jr. Jack J. McDowell Alexander L. Nichols Martin H . Philip Harry Polikoff Col. Shalon Ralph Hon. Augustine A. Repetto Paul H . Rhoads George M. D. Richards JacobS. Richman Hon. Samuel J. Roberts Arthur S. Salus W. Albert Sanders Willis H . Satterthwaite Bernard G. Segal Morris C. Solomon J. Tyson Stokes Allen C. Thomas William H. Vincent Harry P. Voldow Mrs. Edith H. West Jackson Wheatley

CLASS OF 1932 Hon. Alexander F. Barbieri Walter W. Beachboard M. Robert Beckman Samuel A. Blank William C. Bodine Harold J. Conner Hon. John M. Davis Saul Finestone Miss Mary E. Groff Mrs. Rose Kotzin Landy Eugene A. Nogi Israel Packel Harold R. Prowell Hon. Max Rosenn Bernard Schwartz Mrs. Grace Heritage Smith Sidney S. Stark William H. S. Wells Edward z. Winkleman Richard V. Zug

CLASS OF 1933 Gustave G. Amsterdam Max M. Batzer Ellis Berger Robert J. Callaghan Sidney Chait Martin B. Ebbert Hon. Jay H. Eiseman Howard W. Fineshriber Edward First Joseph H. Flanzer Austin Gavin, Jr. Warren G. George Henry J. Goldberg Henry Greenwald Edward A. Kaier Joseph M . Leib William Lipkin Carl P. Lundy Mrs. Samuel Mink

In memory of Samuel Mink

Francis J. Morrissey, Jr. Henry B. Oestreich John B. Pearson Samuel Popper John E. Power, Jr. David H . Rosenbluth Col. Francis M. Sasse Nathan Silberstein Hon. James L. Stern Edward G. Taulane, Jr. Lawrence R. Van Deusen Louis H. Wilderman William C. Wise Samuel R. Wurtman

LAW ALUMNI JOURNAL

CLASS OF 1934 Berthold W. Levy CLASS OF 1939 *Herman S. Davis Harry K. Madway Mrs. Roxana Cannon Arsht Richard J. Farrell S. Samuel Arsht Edwin S. Maimed Henry M. Biglan Oscar Goldberg William D. Barfield Charles W. Miles III William T. Leith Leonard J . Bernstein John W. Bohlen Samuel S. Logan, Jr. John N. Osterlund John P. Bracken Dr. Roland J. Christy Harry A. Poth, Jr. William J. Lowry III J. Horace Churchman Joseph Rhoads Philip A. Bregy Daniel J . McCauley, Jr. William H. Conca Henry W. Scarborough, Jr. Joseph W. P. Burke Charles J. Moos Louis W. Cramer Hon. Charles A. Shea, Jr. T. Sidney Cadwallader II R. Stewart Rauch, Jr. Mrs. Irene R. Dobbs Leo T. Connor Lipman Redman G. William Shea Albert J. Crawford, Jr. Philip B. Driver, Jr. Karl H. Strohl Joseph A. Romig Anthony G. Felix, Jr. Thomas R. White, Jr. Fronefield Crawford Milton W. Rosen Eugene C. Fish William H. Egli Leonard Sarner Edward Fishman John K. Young Leon S. Forman William J. Scarlett Solomon Freedman William L. Fox Norman Seidel Raymond Heimlich CLASS OF 1937 Robert S. Gawthrop, Jr. Bernard J. Smolens Abraham Hofferman Thomas P. Glassmoyer Wilson Stradley Robert L. Lingelbach Joseph Bell Carl E. Heilman Edwin K. Taylor George W. McKee, Jr. Claire G. Biehn James Hunter III S. Robert Teitelman Leon I. Mesirov Edward I. Cutler Arthur R. Kane, Jr. Edmund P. Turtzo A. Arthur Miller Ivan M. Czap H . Allen Lochner Robert C. Walker, Jr. Gilbert W. Oswald Mrs. Florence S. Davidow William H. Loesche, Jr. Roy J. Waychoff, Jr. Ernest D. Preate Dr. Lawrence 0. Ealy Ralph S. Mason Paul A. Wolkin Harold B. Saler Sydney M. Friedman Le Roy S. Maxwell

Emanuel G. Scoblionko Albert B. Gerber Sherwin T. McDowell CLASS OF 1942 Milton C. Sharp Hyman Goldberg Walter P. McEvilly

Morris Smith Louis S. Hankin Miss Doris E. Montgomery Frederic L. Ballard Jerome B. Weinstein Moe H . Hankin John C. Phillips Philip E. Barringer

Lester E. Kabacoff Robert C. Porter Pershing N. Calabro Herman F. Kerner W. Frazier Scott Watson S. Campbell

CLASS OF 1935 Harold E. Kohn W. Simms Sharninghausen William N. Clarke Herman M. Buck

Benjamin S. Loewenstein John P. Sinclair Thomas F. Gill Randal Morgan Elias W. Spengler Donald E . Hittle E. Calvert Cheston Norman L. Plotka Benjamin F. Stahl, Jr. Samuel S. Laucks, Jr. James B. Doak Bayard H. Roberts Aaron S. Swartz III Dr. A. Leo Levin Charles H. Dorsett Victor J. Roberts, Jr. Howard W. Taylor, Jr. Robert E. Newcomb, Jr. Bernard Eskin Alex Satinsky Robert Ungerleider Charles E. Rankin Samuel Fessenden John N. Schaeffer, Jr. Nelson D. Warwick Wi lliam Z. Scott Calvin J. Friedberg Lester J. Schaffer Hon. Roy Wilkinson, Jr. Mrs. Mabel Ditter Sellers Gordon W. Gabell Harry A. Takiff Craig M. Sharpe Frank H. Gelman Robert L. Trescher Elvin R. Souder Kenneth W. Gemmill Frederick A. VanDenbergh, Jr. CLASS OF 1940 Thomas B. Steiger Fred P. Glick Ernest R. Von Starck Hon. Mark Addison Joseph W. Swain, Jr. Louis J. Goffman Benjamin Weinstein Samuel A. Breene H. John Weisman, Jr. Frank E. Hahn, Jr.

John C. Decker Donald V. Hock Richard M. Dicke CLASS OF 1943 Emanuel Laster CLASS OF 1938 Robert J. Dodds, Jr. Robert F. Lehman Ralph M. Barley WilliamS. Eisenhart, Jr. Joseph N. Bongiovanni, Jr.

A. Harry Levitan Samuel B. Blaskey William P. Gregory, Jr. Bernard M. Borish Daniel W. Long Theodore L. Brubaker Carl J. W. Hessinger William J. Dickman Josiah Macy, Jr. Keron D. Chance Andrew Hourigan, Jr. John A. Geisz Wm. Morris Maier Richard N. Clattenburg Richard B. Malis Donald E. Hogeland Daniel F. Marple Sylvan M. Cohen John L. McDonald William B. Johnson Harry R. Most J. Harry Covington III Samuel V. Merrick Charles M. Kschinka Nathan L. Reibman Frederick Y. Dietrick Clinton F. Miller Mrs. Elizabeth Landis Grover C. Richman, Jr. M. Carton Dittmann, Jr. Paul V. Miller Austin M. Lee John Ross Leonard L. Ettinger Arthur E. Newbold III Richard E. McDevitt Louis B. Schwartz Robert N . Ferrer Thomas A. O'Boyle I. David Pincus Boyd L. Spahr, Jr. Bernard Frank Anderson Page John N . Stull Harry E. Sprogell Richard W. Goslin, Jr. William R. Reynolds Ellis W. Vanhorn, Jr. J. Penninton Straus Harry A. Greenberg Edwin P. Rome T. F. Dixon Wainwright Jesse G. Heiges David J. Salaman CLASS OF I 944 Albert C. Weymann, Jr. C. Clothier Jones, Jr. Hon. Edwin H. Satterthwaite Theodore A. Evans Irving Wilner Hon. Gregory G. Lagakos Robert W. Sayre Barton E. Ferst Arnold Winokur Maurice Levin Jacob Seidenberg Frederick G. Kempin, Jr. Erwin Lodge Milton H. Shapiro Meyer Kramer CLASS OF 1936 H. Clayton Louderback Francis R. Tworzydlo L. Stanley Mauger Hon. Barron P. McCune Julius G. Weinberger Carl F. Mogel Sydney S. Asher, Jr. John L. Owens Lewis Weinstock G. Selden Pitt Samuel Bard Irwin Paul David V. Shapiro John Bishop VI Morris Pfaelzer II CLASS OF 1941 Michael Waris, Jr. Roderick T. Clarke Herman B. Poul PaulL. Wise Alfred F. Conard Hanley S. Rubinsohn Edmund Backman Harry B. Davidson Roger Scattergood Herbert Brener

CLASS OF 1945 Harry T. Devine John S. Simpson Horace R. Cardoni Herbert G. Du Bois H. Arthur Smith, Jr. Hon. Paul M. Chalfin Jay D. Barsky Wayland F. Dunaway III Hon. Arnold D. Smorto Frederick J. Charley S. Harry Gal.fand Edward P. Frankel Charles M. Solomon John R. Clark Mrs. Marcella C. White Milton B. Garner James A. Sutton Marvin Comisky Lewis M. Gill Herbert Toff Robert I. Cottom CLASS OF 1946 George C. Laub Robert T. Weniger John J. Dautrich Bernard V. Lentz William White, Jr. Edward M. David Curtis C. Carson, Jr.

Fall 1971 21

Robert G. Erskine, Jr. CLASS OF 1949, February Merton J. Matz Anthony S. Minisi John L. Esterhai

Francis Ballard Charles F. Mayer Edward M. Nagel

John K. Hanrahan J . Grant McCabe III Wilson H. Oldhouser John R. Miller Hyman L. Battle, Jr. William G. O'Neill Marion D, Patterson, Jr. H. Warren Ragot Lewis B. Beatty, Jr. Stanley W. Root, Jr. William P. Quinn Harold Tull Thomas J. Burke Harold Rosenbluth Benjamin H. Read William H. G. Warner Samuel B. Corliss Alexander N. Rubin, Jr. Benjamin F. Schweyer

Cassin W. Craig Sylvan H. Savadove Jack Sirott Samuel S. Cross Alvin R. Schomer George V. Strong, Jr.

CLASS OF 1947 Ralph B. D'Iorio Frank K. Tarbox Walter I. Summerfield, Jr. Sidney Apfelbaum

Hon. George C. Eppinger Thomas Thatcher Kenneth Syken Samuel S. Blank

Bernard A. Fischer Mrs. Virginia B. Wallace William J . Taylor Raymond J. Bradley

Robert B. Frailey Hon. Henry H. Wiley Robert E. Wachs James E. Carr

Gordon W. Gerber Murry J. Waldman Charles R. Cooper, Jr.

M. Stuart Goldin Seth W. Watson, Jr. James W. Hagar CLASS OF 1951 Emerson L. Darnell Edward M. Harris, Jr.

Minturn T. Wright III Robert B. Doll A. C. Reeves Hicks Clyde W. Armstrong Albert G. Driver George Katz, Jr. Marvin K. Bailin CLASS OF 1953 Justin G . Duryea William F. Lynch II Milton Becket Leon Ehrlich John T. Macartney Harold Berger Margaret P . Allen Donald W. Hedges Milford L. McBride, Jr. Christopher Branda, Jr. E. Boyd Asplundh George M. James Lambert B. Ott Crede C. Calhoun Leonard Barkan Robert M. Landis Lawrence M. Perskie William J. Carlin Richard A. Bausher Russell R. Levin Lee N. Steiner Jerome J. Cooper Frederick T. Bebbington Robert H. Malis Caspar W. B. Townsend, Jr. Stuart Coven Don B. Blenko William H. Mann Charles B. P. Van Pelt Harold Cramer Mitchell Brock Alfred W. Putnam William T. Walsh Park B. Dilks, Jr. John Butterworth Herman M. Rodgers Henry M. Wick, Jr. Martin S. Goodman Mrs. Elizabeth Hill Carson Charles Sabin Howard Yarus Joseph K. Gordon Gordon Cavanaugh Henry W. Sawyer Oliver F. Green, Jr. William F. Chester, Jr. Morris L. Weisberg Francis B. Haas, Jr. Warren R. Dwyer

CLASS OF 1949, June Gerald J . Haas Albert J. Feldman George J. Hauptfuhrer, Jr. Louis S. Fine

CLASS OF 1948 William H. Bayer Col. Edmond H. Heisler A. Theodore Flum James G. Aiken Marshall A. Bernstein Leon C. Holt, Jr. Caleb Foote Walter Y. Anthony, Jr. Francis J. Carey Henry M. Irwin Joseph H. Foster John M. Bader Louis J. Carter David Kittner John C. Garner Augustus S. Ballard David A. Clarke James F. Lawler Philip Huss, Jr. Martin M. Bell Basil S. Cole, Jr. Robert L. Leininger Bernard M. Kimmel James C. Bowen Marvin R. Halbert Herbert M. Linsenberg Harry V. Klein, Jr. James F. Brown, Jr. Bancroft D. Haviland Col. Robert F. Maguire John P. Knox Richard P. Brown, Jr. William M. Hebrank John B. McCrory Louis E. Levy Hon. James E. Buckingham Hon. John F . Henderson Edward B. Meredith Allan W. Lugg John A. Clark James F . Hyde, Jr. George J. Miller Donald R. McKay Charles M. Donnelly William F. Hyland Thomas R. Morse, Jr. Ellis H. McKay Aaron M. Fine Frederick H. Law, Jr. James E. O'Connell Hon. William J . McLaughlin III Robert P . Frankel Herman H. Mattleman Donald G. Oyler Charles E. Mechem William J. Fuchs Thomas A. Mcivor James C. N . Paul George A. Moore, Jr. David Goldberg William E. Miller, Jr. James H. Peters Roderick G. Norris Leonard B. Gordon Edward W. Mullinix Louis C. Pulvermacher C. Lee Nutt III Harry M. Grace David W. O'Brien David M. Satz, Jr. Thomas N. O'Neill, Jr. Gordon D. Griffin James A. O'Neill Henry G. Schaefer, Jr. Calvin K. Prine John I. Hartman, Jr. Charles C. Parlin, Jr. Edward M. Seletz Samuel F. Pryor III Joseph F. Harvey Francis M. Richards, Jr. Mrs. Norma Levy Shapiro Donald T. Puckett Hon. Daniel H. Huyett III Marvin Schwartz Robert M. Smith David N. Savitt Solomon Katz Robert W. Valimont John D. Smyers William B. Scatchard, Jr. Noyes E . Leech Franklin H . Spitzer, Jr. Philip Shuchman Harvey Levin William F. Trapnell Richard B. Smith Marvin Levin CLASS OF 1950- Robert S. Trigg Alan M. Spector Robert Margolis Morton Abrams George A. Spohrer Francis E. Marshall William W. Atterbury, Jr. CLASS OF 1952

Stanley P. Stern Robert F. Maxwell J. William Barba Charles B. Strome, Jr. John F. McCarthy, Jr. Frank J. Bowden, Jr. J. Stokes Adams III Donald P . Vernon Marvin D. Perskie Kenneth F. C. Char John G. Bartol, Jr. David E. Wa!loner Franklin Poul Arthur C. Dorrance, Jr. Mrs. Juliet T . Brace S. Donald Wiley Henry T. Reath John W. Douglass J. Scott Calkins Alan D. Williams, Jr. G. Hayward Reid Peter Florey John P. Chandler William A. Wyatt Donald Reuter William J. Garvey Ira B. Coldren, Jr. George R. Rittenhouse John R. Gauntt George H. Conover, Jr.

CLASS OF 1954 Samuel B. Russell M. Kalman Gitomer B. Patrick Costello Hon. Herbert W. Salus, Jr. Richard J. Gordon Clive S. Cummis Paul C. Astor Scott W. Scully Charles H . Greenberg Edward L. Flaherty, Jr . Jerome R. Balka Charles S. Shapiro Robert A. Hauslohner Joseph P. Flanagan, Jr. Edward J . Blake E. Eugene Shelley John F . Heinz Herbert A. Fogel Stanley W. Bluestine John A. Shrader Thomas M. Hyndman, Jr. Maxwell P. Gorson John H. Bozic, Jr. George W. Thompson Paul L. Jaffe Robert S. Hass Berel Caesar Mrs. Mildred L. Weisberg Hon. D. Donald Jamieson Richard A. Huettner Bruce L. Castor Thomas E. Wilcox Henry H. Kaplan Alvin J. Ivers Aims C. Coney, Jr. Dean Bernard Wolfman Stephen J. Korn Milton P. King Chester T . Cyzio Milton A. Wollman Leonard Levin Edwin R. Lowry Pasquale DiQuinzio John F. Zeller III Solomon Lubin William J. Lubic Robert Freedman

22 LAW ALUMNI JOURNAL

Marvin Garfinkel Richard V. Holmes Howard Gittis Jesse H. Choper William L. Glosser Seymour Kanter Melvin D. Glass Frederick Cohen Morton S. Gorelick Alan G. Kirk II Richard T. Gross Edward I. Dobin Garry G. Greenstein Arthur W. Leibold, Jr. Bernard M. Guth John F. Dugan II Ralph V. Jones Charles F. Ludwig John G. Harkins, Jr. Frank Federman Richard J. Jordan Richard L. McMahon Henry R. Heebner, Jr. Melvin S. Feldman Ben F. Kaito Mrs. Mercea Panfil Mears Raymond L. Hovis Mrs. Ruth M. Ferrell E. Brooks Keffer, Jr. James W. Moore Baron E. Kessler Cherie A. Gaines Samuel M. Lehrer Milton 0. Moss Michael G. Kurcias Gordon Gelfond S. Gerald Litvin Robert Neustadter Harvey Levin Lewis J. Gordon Albert F. McGee, Jr. Harris Ominsky James A. Loughran Frank E. Greenberg Henry C. McGrath Mrs. Ruth Renner Percy Alan W. Margolis Robert J. Hastings Thomas F. Meehan, Jr. Mrs. Guyla W. Ponomareff John P. McKenna, Jr. Edmund G. Hauff Gerald J. Mongelli Curtis R. Reitz George B. McNelis Charles A. Heimbold, Jr. William J. Purcell John S. Schmid T. Weldon Monteith, Jr. Edward Hoopes IV Pace Reich Carl W. Schneider Ramon R. Obod I. Grant Irey, Jr. Eugene H. Rotberg Alvin G. Shpeen Michael A. Orlando III John R. Jakubowski Stanford Shmukler Leonard S. Slavit John H. Parkes Allan Katz Morris M. Shuster Donn P. Slonim James A. Perrin Charles G. Kopp Barry R. Spiegel Mrs. Dolores Sloviter Littleton W. Roberts, Jr. Gerald G. Kramer Michael J. Stack, Jr. Dr. Barlow Smith Paul S. Roeder, Jr. Henry W. Lavine George S. Stewart III John A. Vuono John J. Runzer William S. Lee James F. Swartz John M. Wajert Joseph H. Savitz Frank H. Lewis William Thatcher Saul I. Weinstein Allan B. Schneirov Randall D. Luke William A. Whiteside, Jr. Vincent X. Yakowicz William J. Sharkey Bernard H. Lundy Mrs. Joan P. Wohl David J. Steinberg David 0. Miller Edward A. Woolley

CLASS OF 1957 Richard W. Stevens Benjamin S. Ohrenstein

Sidney T. Yates L. Gerald Tarantino, Jr. Robert E. Penn Alvin S. Ackerman Friedrich J. Weinkopf Alan B. Portnoff

CLASS OF 1955 Maurice Axelrad Marvin Weiss Samuel J. Reich John Bertman Elliott Yampell Richard D. Rivers

Joel C. Coleman Isaac H. Clothier Edward Robin Samuel Diamond Robert S. Cohen CLASS OF 1959

George F. Robinson Edward L. Edelstein James N. Diefenderfer Hugh A. A. Sargent Milton A. Feldman Mahlon M. Frankhauser Louis J. Adler David E. Seymour Bernard J. Goodheart Samuel L. Glantz Philip G. Auerbach David S. Shrager David C. Harrison Robert E. Glaymon Donald Beckman Silas Spengler Donald R. Haws Larry J. Goldsborough John W. Brock, Jr. William T. Sutphin Robert L. Hesse George C. Greer Gerald Broker Lowell S. Thomas, Jr. Irving M. Hirsh Gordon F. Harrington, Jr. H. Donald Busch Thomas T. Trettis, Jr. James M. Howley Norman M. Heisman Richard L. Cantor Nicholas Vadino, Jr. W. Scott Johns III John 0. Karns Robert D. Carroll Joseph T. Vodnoy David J. Kaufman Richard Kirschner Jonathan S. Cohen John A. Walter Robert L. Kendall, Jr. Goncer M. Krestal William Congreve III Charles M. Weisman Bernard J. Korman Seymour Kurland Wallace P. Cooney Alvin M. Weiss Norman M. Kranzdorf William W. Lanigan John J. Cowan David L. Williams Edwin Krawitz Charles H. Laveson Murray S. Eckel! Marvin M. Wodlinger Arthur Levy William G. Malkames Seymour H. Feingold Frederick D. Wood Arthur H. Moss Stephen J. McEwen, Jr. Gerald F. Flood, Jr. Ronald Ziegler Paul A. Mueller, Jr. Edward M. Medvene Arthur R. Gorr Bertram S. Murphy Joseph S. Moloznik Austin B. Graff CLASS OF 1961 Barton L. Post Jerrold V. Moss August E. Grashof Benjamin R. Achenbach S. White Rhyne, Jr. James M. Mulligan Hon. Bernard M. Gross James H. Agger Angus M. Russell D. Frederick Muth Selwyn A. Horvitz Paul R. Anapol Henry S. Ruth, Jr. Jay G. Ochroch John R. Hudders Lewis Becker Hon. Ralph F. Scalera Russell R. Reno, Jr. David M. Jordan Lawrence F. Corson Murray M. Schwartz Thomas B. K. Ringe, Jr. Lewis Kates Raymond K. Denworth, Jr. Edward L. Snitzer Richard M. Rosenbleeth Albert W. Laisy Mrs. Ruth Morris Force Alvin L. Snowiss Edward E. Russell Robert A. Martin Michael D. Foxman Joseph H. Stanziani Richard G. Schneider Burton M. Mirsky Fredric J. Freed D. Charles Valsing Mrs. Ellen Queeney Suria Thomas B. Moorhead Robert A. Freedman Mervin M. Wilf John R. Suria John T. Mulligan Bernard Glassman Barry B. Wohlman Myles H. Tanenbaum Herbert L. Olivieri Rayner M. Hamilton Norman P. Zarwin Michael L. Temin Peter C. Paul Mrs. Ann Epstein Harrison

Parke H. Ulrich, Jr. Peter H. Pfund Joseph J. Horvath

CLASS OF 1956 E. Norman Veasey Hon. George F. Reed James N. Horwood Ronald P. Wertheim G. Wayne Renneisen Philip L. Hummer

Herbert J. Abedon Marshall A. Rutter Anthony L. Joseph Louis D. Apothaker CLASS OF 1958

Bernard L. Segal Michael Joseph Edward F. Beatty, Jr. Oscar F. Spicer Malcolm B. Kane Robert M. Beckman Robert M. Abramson Alan R. Squires Charles K. Keil Donald K. Bobb Duffield Ashmead III Joseph F. Strain Lewis S. Kunkel, Jr. Richard L. Bond Bennett I. Bardfeld Louis M. Tarasi, Jr. Herbert W. Larson Paul C. Dewey S. David Brandt Ira P. Tiger Anthony S. Leidner John A. Erickson Benjamin E. Carter Herbert A. Vogel P:wl G. Levy Leonard Etz Alvin M. Chanin John D. Wilson Wilfred F. Lorry Henry B. Fitzpatrick, Jr. Philip Cohen Jack K. Mandel Richard H. Floum John H. Flannery, Jr.

CLASS OF 1960 Spencer G. Nauman, Jr. Hon. Isaac S. Garb Hon. Michael V. Franciosa S. Allen Needleman Paul D. Guth Stanley Frank David Acton David F. Norcross J. Barton Harrison Jacques Geisenberger, Jr. Edward L. Batoff Frederick D. Pettit

Fall 1971 23

Arthur D. Rabelow Mrs. Myrna Paul Field Howard Shapiro Lawrence A. Garber David V. Randall Melvyn Freeman Gordon D. Simonds Robert S. Gardner Robert A. Rosin Edward M. Glickman Earl B. Slavitt Mark E. Goldberg James M. Scanlon Jay L. Goldberg Burton K. Stein Marvin S. goldklang Mayor Shanken J.ohn L. Harrison, Jr. James A. Strazzella Roger L. Goldman Robert M. Shay John B. Hayter Peter C. Ward William T. Hangley Anthony J. Sobczak Arthur S. Karafin Richard D. Wood III Paul W. Heil A. Grant Sprecher Martin N. Kroll Bruce G. Her melee David L. Steck Robert Kruger CLASS OF 1965 Stewart A. Hirschhorn Marc L. Swartzbaugh Judah I. Labovitz

Martin J. Aronstein Robert S. Hodavance

Gilbert Wasserman John J. Langenbach John P. Howland David H. Wheeler Arthur L. Levine Harvey Bartle III Gerald Kobell Roger S. Young Arnold Machles Robert E. Benson Jeffrey K. Kominers

David H. Marion Harold P. Block Mark Landis Sidney G. Masri Malcolm M. Blumberg Joseph E. Lastowka, Jr. CLASS OF 1962 John H. McGrail George G. Breed William N. Levy

Richard D. Atkins Henry F. Miller Paul J. Bschorr Stephen S. Lippman Paul Auerbach Joseph L. Monte, Jr. Mrs. Lita Indzel Cohen Stephen N. Lipton Leigh W. Bauer Earle J. Patterson III Robert F. Dakin Edward F. Mannino John W. Beatty Neil Reiseman Albert L. Doering III Leroy S. Maxwell, Jr. George R. Beck, Jr. Herbert Riband, Jr. Charles H. Dorsett, Jr. John R. Merrick R. David Bradley Michael J. Rotko Alfred J. Dougherty J. Anthony Messina Jon as Brodie Stephen A. Sheller Neil G. Epstein Miss Patricia A. Metzer E. Barclay Cale, Jr. Daniel C. Soriano, Jr. William H. Ewing Melvin B. Miller Leonard J. Cooper Max Spinrad James A. Freyer Mrs. Stephanie W. Naidoff James D. Crawford Robert J. Stern Meritt B. Gavin Todd S. Parkhurst Kenneth M. Cushman David C. Toomey Stephen M. Goodman H. Donald Pasquale George C. Decas Thomas R. White III Allan B. Greenwood Samuel S. Pearlman Richard D. Ehrlich Mrs. Faith Ryan Whittlesey David D. Hagstrom Elliot B. Platt Nick S. Fisfis Miss Susan P. Windle Gilbert W. Harrison David Plimpton John E. Gillmor Stephen G. Yusem Paul C. Heintz Daniel Promislo Herbert Goldfeld John F. Hellegers William M. Robinson Stephen R. Goldstein James W. Jennings Capt. Emery H. Rosenbluth, Jr. Harold Greenberg CLASS OF 1964 James H. Johns, Jr. Daniel R. Ross John A. Herdeg John T . Andrews, Jr. J. William Johnson Fred A. Ruttenberg Burton Hoffman Richard A. Ash Richard F. Kotz Michael A. Sand Paul D. Horger Steven T. Atkins Louis Kurland Roland J. Santoni Garry Hyatt Frank B. Baldwin, III, L '64 William M. Labkoff Palmer K. Schreiber

William H. Lamb Joel D. Siegel Steven D. Ivins Michael M. Baylson Alan M. Lerner Warren J. Kauffman Gurney P. Sloan, Jr. John P. Kelley

Harry P. Begier, Jr. Albert L. Lingelbach Richard D. Steel G. William Bissell Harry R. Marshall, Jr. Edward D. Temoyan Daniel J. Lawler Max E. Blumenthal Edward J. Lewis George C. Bradley Gerald J. McConomy .T ohn H. Titley Charles A. Lintgen William J. Morehouse Glen A. Tobias Earl T. Britt Morgan L. Pape Robert I. Toll David P. Loughran Jerome S. Cohen Edwin S. Moore III Nicholas D. Constan, Jr. Ernest D. Preate, Jr. Michael B. Vath Mrs. Suzanne S. Morris CarlS. Rauh Harold K. Vickery, Jr. Stephen A. Cozen Harry E. Reagan III Stephen J. Moses George M. Dallas IV Richard N. Weiner

Joseph A. Ryan Matthew C. Weisman Francis W. Murphy David Dearborn Blair L. Sadler Paul T. Willis Alexander Neave Francis W. Deegan Sheldon N. Sandler H. Christopher Nolde Marshall A. Deutsch Thomas E. Wood Peter V. Savage Richard A. Wylie Philip S. Nyman Neil K. Evans Mrs. Anita R. Shapiro Lewis F. Parker Peter A. Eveleth

Robert M. Philson H. Robert Fiebach Arthur R. Spector CLASS OF 1967 Richard F. Stern Alan J. Pogarsky Dennis M. Flannery David F. Stover Ira Brind Martin M. Pollock Michael 0. Floyd Joseph T. Stratman C. Oliver Burt III John H. Potts Michael H. Frankel Neil H. Tannebaum Stephen J. Cabot Richard J. Sharkey Steven R. Frankel John T. Williams Melvyn L. Cantor M. Michael Sharlot Robert G. Fuller, Jr. Parker H. Wilson Edward T. Chase Louis P. Silverman John R. Gibbel James A. Wimmer Mark H. Chazin Martin W. Spector L. Anthony Gibson Harold K. Cohen Clayton H. Thomas, Jr. Henry A. Gladstone CLASS OF 1966 Mrs. Irene H. Cotton

Richard J. Haber Daniel A. Durkin CLASS OF 1963 Cary R. Hardy John N. Ake, Jr. Andrew M. Epstein

Henry S. Hilles, Jr. David J. Anderson Donald G. Gavin Steven A. Arbittier George H. Jackson III Mrs. Carol Rubovitz Aronoff William Goldstein David E. Auerbach Richard A. Jacoby Robert N. Axelrod William B. Gray David C. Auten Alan K. Kaplan James F. Bell Michael R. Green Phillip H. Baer William J. Levy James B. Blinkoff Dr. William C. Hewson Donald V. Berlanti Mrs. Frederica K. Lombard Harry 0. Boreth William A. Humenuk Aaron D. Blumberg Richard K. Mandell Stephen M. Brett David E. Jordan Harold Bogatz Charles M. Marshall Robert A. Budd M. Richard Kalter Abraham J. Chasnoff Francis J. Murphy Charles B. Burr II Arthur L. Klein Birchard T. Clothier Samuel H. Nelson Henry D. Cavanna William H. Kuehnle Henry B. Cortesi Bruce S. Nielsen Philip L. Cohan James B. Leonard Robert J. Cotton David C. Patten Michael M. Coleman Alan R. Markizon Thomas F. Cunnane Miss Marian R. Pearlman Roger F. Cox Harry D. Mercer Nicholas P. Damico David I. Robinson John M. Desiderio Marvin J. Mundel Mrs. Joanne R. Denworth Christopher R. Rosser James Eiseman, Jr. Arthur E. Newbold IV Lowell H. Dubrow Melvyn B. Ruskin Allan M. Elfman John C. Newcomb David M. Epstein Herbert F. Schwartz Burton D. Fretz Mrs. Sue C. Ostuni

24 LAW ALUMNI JOURNAL

Robert C. Ozer Norman Pearlstine Miss Dale J. Penneys Richard R. Rulon Louis S. Sachs Harold A. Schwartz, Jr. Mrs. Roberta Lee Scott Paul E. Shapiro J. Robert Vankirk Mrs. Sharon K. Wallis Lawrence Weiner Warren E. Winslow, Jr.

CLASS OF 1968

Stanton V. Abrams Richard L. Bazelon Richard I. Beattie Jr. David Bender Stanley J. Bernstein Paul A. Coghlan Douglas C. Conroy Terrence J. Daily Peter H. Dodson William E. Elwood John W. Fischer Earl R. Franklin John W. Frazier IV Michael A. Gaffin Peter G. Glenn Mark D. Gordon Murray A. Greenberg Gail Sanger Halperin Richard E. Halperin H. Ben Bander Lawrence B. Hannah Thomas D. Renderer

Robert A. Jones John T. Kehner Brian T. Keirn William 0. Lamotte III Mrs. Edith Gresham Laver Norman E. Levine David H. Lissy David S. Litwin Carl N. Martin II Charles M. Newbrand Charles H. Norris, Jr. Mrs. Joy Kleiner Pollock Arthur H. Rainey Thomas A. Ralph Miss Paula Rosenthal Kenneth A. Sagat John D. Schupper Leonard A. Segal Howard L. Shecter John 0. Shirk Norman B. Skydell Rudolph A. Socey, Jr. Lewis G. Steinberg Clifford H. Swain Peter S. Thompson Miner H. Warner Alfred H. Wilcox Richard H. Woods

CLASS OF 1969

Stephen M. Adelson Jay R. Baer James A. Bartholomew Loftus E. Becker, Jr. Arthur M. Best

ABOVE AVERAGE These classes equalled or bettered the over-all

Alumni participation of 35%

Class Agent Per Cent 1911 David S. Malis 67 1921 William I. Woodcock, Jr. 61 1931 Knox Henderson 51 1904 50 1908 Isaac Ash 50 1960 John A. Walter 46 1927 C. Leo Sutton 45 1915 44 1954 Morris M. Shuster 44 1920 Donald H. Williams 43 1938 M. Carton Dittmann, Jr. 43 1939 James Hunter III and

Arthur R. Kane, Jr. 43 1914 Frank H. Mancill 42 1916 Joseph L. Ehrenreich 42 1944 Barton E. Ferst 42 1933 Nathan Silberstein 40 1957 Richard G. Schneider 40 1961 David L. Steck 39 1928 Joseph Brandschain 38 1964 William J. Levy 38 1966 James F. Bell III 38 1926 Joseph G. Feldman 37 1935 Frank E. Hahn, Jr. 37 1962 Kenneth M. Cushman 37 1948 Franklin Poul 36 1953 Leonard Barkan 36 1965 Harvey Bartle III 36 1922 E. Perry Campbell 35 1925 Desmond J. McTighe 35 1929 Alan J. Smith 35 1950 Stephen J. Korn 35 1963 Herbert S. Riband, Jr. 35

Fall 1971

Miss Brigid E. Carey Mark D. Coler Stewart R. Dalzell George W. Davies Robert J. Dodds III Thomas E. Doran Dennis J. Drabelle William D. Eggers Richard A. Flye Spencer W. Frank, Jr. John B. Galus Henry Y. Goldman Charles A. Gordon Albert P. Hegyi John F. Hunsicker, Jr. Lee M. Hymerling Detlef G. Lehnardt Santiago G. Leon Marjorie G. Marinoff John F. Meigs J. Gregg Miller Mrs. Lynn S. Moore Edward L. Peck Mrs. Margaret Moist Powers William R. Powers, Jr. Robert R. Radway James B. Robinson William G. Rogerson Miss Carol 0. Seabrook William Mark Sendrow Richard P. Sills Albert R. Simonds, Jr. Courtney C. Smith, Jr. Miss Susan I. Spivak Richard W. Stevenson Jeffrey M. Stopford Samuel 0. Tilton

Jay C. Waldman Paul F. Ware, Jr. Gregory A. Weiss Bradford F. Whitman Stephen G. Young

CLASS OF 1970

Mark L. Austrian Lt. William A. Bachmann Walter S. Batty, Jr. Paul Bernbach Stephen L. Blumberg Ronald E. Bornstein Carroll J. Cavanagh Howard L. Dale Mark A. Frankel Steven B. Fuerst Earl D. Greenburg Frederick B. Henry Edward J. Kaier Anthony S. Kaufmann John E. Kratz, Jr. Steven B. Lapin Daniel Lewis Thomas J. Me Grew John W. Reading Stephen A. Saltzburg Charles H. Scherer Mrs. Mary Ellen Schwab Alfred L. Shilling David R. Straus Ralph N. Teeters Mrs. Leslie L. Tomenson Robert K. Vincent, Jr. Edward H. Weis J. Michael Willmann

CLASS PERFORMANCES GREATEST NUMBER

OF DOLLARS CONTRIBUTED

Class Agent Amount 1931 Knox Henderson $8,639 1927 C. Leo Sutton 6,335 1948 Franklin Poul 4,071

GREATEST NUMBER OF CONTRIBUTORS

Class Agent Number 1966 James F. Bell III 70 1931 Knox Henderson 54 1964 William J. Levy 53

BEST PER CENT OF PARTICIPATION (Classes of 25 or more)

Class Agent PerCent 1931 Knox Henderson 51 1960 John A. Walter 46 1927 C. Leo Sutton 45

BEST PER CENT OF PARTICIPATION (Classes of less than 25 )

Class Agent PerCent 1911 David S. Malis 67 1921 William I. Woodcock, Jr. 61 1904 50 1908 Isaac Ash 50

25

REPORT OF CLASSES Charman-ANDREW HoURIGAN, JR., L'40

1970-71 1969-70 No. in No. Per Cent No. in No. Per Cent Class Giving Giving Amount Class Giving Giving Amount

Class Agent Parents 14 $1 ,545.00 Non-Alumni 23 1,241.00 4 $1 ,950.00

1897-1902 8 17 1 6 15.00 1903 Morris Wolf 5 1 20 100.00 7 I 14 100.00 1904 2 1 50 25.00 3 1 33 25.00 1905 6 2 33 1,025.00 8 2 25 1,025.00 1906 John Martin Doyle 4 1 25 50.00 4 1 25 50.00 1907 4 1 25 100.00 6 2 33 200.00 1908 Isaac Ash 12 6 50 1,340.00 14 7 50 1,520.00 1909 Russell Wolfe 9 1 11 10.00 9 I II 20.00 1910 Philip Sterling 15 5 33 290.00 20 5 25 225.00 1911 David S. Malis 12 8 67 565.00 14 6 43 635.00 1912 W. Barclay Lex 18 5 28 1,015.25 20 7 35 1,067.50 1913 Samuel R. Rosenbaum 15 3 20 90.00 18 2 ll 65.00 1914 Frank H. Mancil! 24 10 42 2,715.00 32 11 34 2,844.88 1915 23 10 44 2,584.82 26 7 27 1,200.00 1916 Joseph L. Ehrenreich 24 10 42 980.00 25 11 44 920.00 1917 Rodney T. Bonsall 40 12 30 1,935.00 48 15 31 1,920.00 1918-19 10 2 20 230.00 12 3 25 230.00 1920 Donald H. Williams 14 6 43 385.00 16 11 69 3,786.88 1921 William I. Woodcock, Jr. 13 8 61 770.00 15 10 67 1,745.00 1922 E . Perry Campbell 34 12 35 715.00 36 11 31 660.00 1923 Hon. George W. Griffith 16 5 31 262.00 18 6 33 297.00 1924 31 8 26 1,422.81 33 15 45 2,041.88 1925 Desmond J. McTighe 37 13 35 2,065.00 38 18 47 3,955.00 1926 Joseph G. Feldman 30 11 37 2,697.00 34 7 21 1,002.00 1927 C. Leo Sutton 73 33 45 6,335.00 79 29 37 5,305.00 1928 Joseph Brandschain 74 28 38 2,212.00 76 21 28 1,450.00 1929 Alan J. Smith 77 27 35 3,420.00 77 24 31 3,430.00 1930 J. Russell Gibbons 87 29 33 1,715.00 93 32 34 1,895.00 1931 Knox Henderson 105 54 51 8,639.06 108 36 33 7,400.00 1932 Walter W. Beachboard 87 20 23 2,942.50 94 17 18 2,312.50 1933 Nathan Silberstein 82 33 40 3,115.00 86 32 37 3,261.25 1934 Dr. Roland J. Christy 76 26 34 3,323.19 82 29 35 3,394.19 1935 Frank E. Hahn, Jr. 90 33 37 3,127.81 93 33 35 2,511 .00 1936 Milton B. Garner 97 27 28 2,615 .00 98 27 28 2,404.00 1937 Harry A. Takiff 91 25 27 2,821.76 94 29 31 3,170.50 1938 M. Carton Dittmann, Jr. 82 35 43 2,702.00 84 38 45 2,698.00 1939 James Hunter III &

Arthur R. Kane, Jr. 86 37 43 2,320.00 88 36 41 2,253 .50 1940 Lewis Weinstock 93 27 29 3,920.00 97 25 26 4,885.00 1941 Paul A. Wolkin 98 33 34 3,113 .13 100 31 31 3,310.13 1942 Frederic L. Ballard 66 19 29 1,371.50 68 21 31 1,030.13 1943 Richard E. McDevitt 50 13 26 630.00 48 9 19 230.00 1944 Barton E. Ferst 24 10 42 895.00 24 11 46 575.00 1945 9 3 33 210.00 9 5 56 275.00 1946 John L. Esterhai &

John R. Miller 26 8 31 220.00 27 7 26 135.00 1947 Robert M. Landis 75 21 28 2,873.50 75 14 19 850.00 1948 Franklin Poul 130 47 36 4,070.75 130 42 32 2,346.50 1949F Charles B. P. VanPelt 87 28 32 3,075.00 87 31 36 3,017.50 1949J Louis J. Carter 73 22 30 1,675 .00 73 31 42 2,005.00 1950 Stephen J. Korn 100 35 35 1,931.00 100 33 33 1,605 .00 1951 Henry M. Irwin 127 43 34 3,557.39 130 41 32 2,830.62 1952 Joseph P. Flanagan, Jr. 118 35 30 2,291.80 118 36 31 1,713.44 1953 Leonard Barkan 132 48 36 2,320.00 132 52 39 2,309.00 1954 Morris M. Shuster 89 39 44 1,945.00 89 34 38 1,440.00 1955 Irving M. Hirsh &

Robert L. Kendall, Jr. 100 33 33 2,170.00 100 34 34 2,010.00 1956 Henry B. Fitzpatrick

& Hon. Isaac S. Garb 122 39 32 2,008.00 122 44 36 1,763.00 1957 Richard G. Schneider 96 38 40 2,323.00 96 39 41 1,725.00 1958 George B. McNelis 124 42 34 1,985.00 124 34 27 1,455 .00 1959 Joseph Beller 152 42 28 2,085.00 152 48 32 2,341.25 1960 John A. Walter 111 51 46 2,478.75 111 60 54 2,338.75 1961 David L. Steck Ill 43 39 1,905.00 111 37 33 1,205.00 1962 Kenneth M. Cushman 123 46 37 1,260.00 123 50 41 1,504.50 1963 Herbert S. Riband, Jr. 135 47 35 1,215.00 135 43 32 1,100.50 1964 William J. Levy 140 53 38 2,838.10 140 39 35 2,483.00 1965 Harvey Bartle III 141 51 36 1,787.42 141 53 38 1,003.23 1966 James F. Bell III 184 70 38 1,725.00 184 50 27 1,345.00 1967 Jacob P. Hart &

Lawrence Weiner 168 39 23 560.00 168 37 22 637 .00 1968 Thomas A. Ralph &

Alfred H . Wilcox 171 50 29 890.00 171 51 30 2,826.00 1969 George W. Davies &

Gregory A. Weiss 188 47 25 860.00 181 30 17 457.00 1970 Franklin L. Best &

Robert K. Vincent 140 29 21 530.00 25.00 5,016 1,736 35% $130,165.53 4,991 1,631 33 % $121,761.63

1970-71 SPECIAL GIFTS

During the past year, the Law School received anum­ber of significant special purpose gifts and gifts in the nature of additional endowment, aggregating approxi­mately $291,750. Although this is the Annual Giving Report, it seems appropriate to append this summary of substantial special gifts which will provide nurture to the Law School for both specific and general purposes for the coming year and many years to come:

Alumni and friends of the Biddle Law Library res­ponded to a call from the Dean, providing a special development fund in honor of Morris L. Cohen, the Biddle Law Librarian. The University added $25,000 to the almost $38,000 contributed by alumni and friends.

The firm of Blank, Rome, Klaus and Comisky hon­ored its senior, Philip F. Newman, L'17, on the occa­sion on his 75th birthday, by providing a generous gift for general Law School purposes. The main Law School administration office has been dedicated in honor of Philip F. Newman.

Three Philadelphia law firms (Blank, Rome, Klaus and Comisky; Schnader, Harrison, Segal and Lewis; and Wolf, Block, Schorr and Solis-Cohen) joined a number of individuals and foundations in providing needed scholarship assistance for black law students without which the students helped would not be in school today. Members of the Law School Faculty, providing gifts totaling $5,000, were among those con­tributing for this purpose.

A substantial additional sum has been added to the Ida Russell Cades Memorial Fund, the income of which is available for general Law School purposes.

The Fels Foundation made a grant which enabled the School's Prison Research Council to carry on its outstanding, unique educational and service activities.

The M. H . Goldstein Memorial Prize in Labor Law has been established at the Law School by generous contributions from the law firm of Ettinger, Poserina,

ABOVE AVERAGE These Regions equalled or bettered the over-all alumni

participation of 35%

Region Agent PerCent Cleveland, Ohio Henry W. Lavine, L '60 62

Lackawanna County, James E. O'Connell, L '51 56 Pennsylvania

York County, 50 Pennsylvania

Northampton County, John C. Hambrook, L '47 45 Pennsylvania

Boston, Philip S. Nyman, L '62 43 Massachusetts

Fall 1971

Silverman, Dubin, Anapol and Sagot, and others in memory of their late partner, M. H. Goldstein, dean of the labor bar. An award will be given each year at commencement to the outstanding student in the field of Labor Law.

The Haas Community Fund made a very significant unrestricted gift to the Law School which was used to augment funds available for faculty research. In addi­tion, it provided needed funds for minority student scholarships.

The Keystone Foundation made a gift to the Law School to support research on problems of pollution.

A very generous gift has been provided the Law School by B. Nathaniel Richter, L'33, and one of the classrooms in the Law School addition has been named Richter Hall. This gift will be available for general Law School purposes.

Charles S. Shapiro, L'48, contributed a fund in mem­ory of his father, Harry S. Shapiro, L'11, for the bene­fit of the Biddle Law Library, in particular to provide funds for augmenting its collection of Israeli Law and to purchase a set of the 60 sterling silver commemorative medals issued in a limited edition by the Legal Heritage Society and executed by the Franklin Mint, dealing with man's history of Law from ancient days to our current legal system.

The Samuel L. Sperling Foundation has made a gen­erous gift to the Law School in memory of Samuel L. Sperling, L'32. The Samuel L. Sperling Fund thus created will perpetuate the memory of a distinguished law student and practitioner and will provide income for general Law School needs.

The Trustees of the Frank Strick Foundation have contributed a sum for the benefit of our student aid program.

In addition to the foregoing, a number of smaller gifts, some given anonymously, have augmented the School's student scholarship and loan funds.

A GLANCE AT TEN YEARS OF ANNUAL GIVING

Year Number of Per Cent Amount Contributors Participation Contributed

1961-62 1498 37 $53,325. 1962-63 1680 41 63,389. 1963-64 1791 42 72,935. 1964-65 1860 42 87,164. 1965-66 1920 43 102,124. 1966-67 1904 43 105,454. 1967-68 1857 40 118,491. 1968-69 1760 37 118,187. 1969-70 1631 33 121,7~2.

1970-71 1736 35 130,166.

27

CORPORATE GIFT PROGRAM

A total of 28 forward-looking companies matched, wholly or in part, the gifts that their employees, officers and directors made to Law Alumni Annual Giving in the 1970-71 campaign.

Alumni who are eligible to have their gifts matched are urged to send their company's form in order that the Law School may benefit from it. The matching

AIR PRODUCTS & CHEMICALS, INC. AIR REDUCTION COMPANY, INC.

BRISTOL-MYERS COMPANY

CAMPBELL Soup CoMPANY

CHASE MANHATTAN BANK FoUNDA noN

CONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY

COVINGTON & BURLING EATON, YALE & TOWNE, INC.

FIRST PENNSYLVANIA BANKING & TRUST COMPANY FORD MOTOR COMPANY

INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA

INTERNATIONAL TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH

ITEK CORPORATION JOHNSON & HIGGINS

amount is also credited to you, your class, and your re­gion. The Alumni Office will be glad to supply informa­tion to any alumnus who may be in a position to suggest the establishment of a matching gift plan in his company.

The companies who participated in the 1970-71 Law School Alumni Annual Giving campaign are listed below.

JONES & LAUGHLIN STEEL LAWYERS COOPERATIVE PUBLISHING COMPANY, THE

MARINE MIDLAND CORPORATION

OCCIDENTAL PETROLEUM

OLIN MATHIESON CHARITABLE TRUST PAN AM CHARITABLE FouNDATION, INc.

PEAT MARWICK MITCHELL FouNDATION

PENNSYLVANIA PowER & LIGHT CoMPANY

PENNWALT CHEMICAL CORPORATION

PITNEY-BOWES, INC. PITTSBURGH NATIONAL BANK FouNDATION

PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA

ScoTT PAPER CoMPANY

SMITH, KLINE & FRENCH FOUNDATION

SUMMARY OF REGIONS (Areas, other than Delaware Valley, with 15 or more alumni)

Chairman-LIPMAN REDMAN, L'41

Number No. parti- Per Cent Region Chairman Alumni cipating participation Amount

California Los Angeles Marshall Rutter, L'59 81 19 23 $ 1,685 San Francisco 51 13 25 395

Delaware Wilmington Herbert W. Larson, L'61 90 30 33 1,477

District of Columbia Charles B. Ruttenberg, L'49 270 91 34 4,983

Illinois Chicago Richard G. Farrell, L'41 30 10 33 545

Massachusetts Boston Philip S. Nyman, L'62 49 21 43 678

New Jersey Atlantic City Robert Neustadter, L'56 51 11 22 650 Mercer County Edward B. Meredith, L'51 40 9 23 500

New York City Richard M. Dicke, L'40 374 114 31 10,064

Ohio Cleveland Henry W. Lavine, L'60 29 18 62 610

Pennsylvania George J. Miller, L'51 91 29 32 1,815 Allegheny County

Berks County 49 11 22 575 Dauphin County Francis B. Haas, Jr. , L'51 65 22 34 835 Erie County 30 5 17 90 Lackawanna Co. James E. O'Connell, L'51 48 27 56 1,580 Lancaster County Robert L. Pfannebecker, L'58 41 12 29 2,615 Lehigh County Emanuel G. Scoblionko, L'34 52 14 27 1,461 Luzerne County Charles D. Lemmond, Jr., L'55 66 15 23 1,638 Northampton Co. John C. Hambrook, L'47 44 20 45 880 Schuylkill County Calvin J. Friedberg, L'35 22 3 14 300 York County 22 11 50 492

1,595 505 32% $33,868

28 LAW ALUMNI JOURNAL

Wolflllan (Continued from page 2)

will justify a return to our prior levels of research ac­tivity.

Finally, I want to say a word about you as individ­uals. Your noteworthy performance as practitioners of the law, your leadership in the organized Bar and in efforts to secure law reform and more equal justice, your recognition by appointments to the Bench and to positions of governmental responsibility, and the stead­fastness of your loyalty to the school, have been in­spiring to my colleagues and to me. Some of you have made very significant capital gifts to the school which will be noted in my Annual Report. Others have been at my side and on the telephone with words of advice and encouragement. You understand the importance and the meaning of academic freedom. You defend those who exercise it whether or not you agree with their substantive views. In this atmosphere the Law School flourishes. For all of this your Law School and its Dean are grateful.

Police (Continued from page 4)

Acknowledging these limitations, this study still at­tempts to describe, as fully as possible, the private police situation in one major city-Philadelphia. It also at­tempts an analysis of some of the broader implications of the problems in Philadelphia with respect to control mechanisms and regulatory devices for private police generally.

Who Are The "Private Police"? If we consider anyone who is involved with the pro­

vision of security services, either investigative or protec­tive, and who is not actually an agent of the state as a private policeman, we find that there are four kinds of such private police in Philadelphia.

There are those who are employed by security com­panies or agencies who normally operate with a private detective's license. There are those who are employees of a large department store or chain store in their security department. There are those who operate with a private watchman or a private patrolman commission and there are those who provide security service solely on and for state property. ( 1) Security Agencies and the Private Detective Licenses:

Almost all of the agencies which provide security service operate with this type of license. It is obtained

Fall 1971

by petitioning the Court for a license in a procedure which is set out in the Private Detective Act of 1953. The County Detective's office for the District Attorney will review each application for this license. They verify all of the information and pay special attention to the requirement of previous experience in security work. Fingerprints are checked with both local and state police. The DA will recommend to the Court that the license be denied if he determines that the applicant does not meet the requirements. It is estimated that about one­third of the applications are refused each year. (2) Security Departments of Department Stores or Chain Stores:

Most chain stores, department stores and some large industries simply operate their own security force with­out hiring guards from a contract agency or obtaining a special license. They usually hire an ex-policeman or security officer to be the head of the security department and all of the employees in the department are respon­sible to him. Because they do not provide security services to any outside company or business, they do not come under the Private Detective Act and they are not obliged to obtain a license. ( 3) Private Watchmen and Private Patrolmen:

These are individuals who are given a specific com­mission by the Philadelphia Police Department. This commission may be either that of a watchman or a patrolman and there are differences in the powers granted by the two commissions. The individuals who apply for, and are granted either of these commissions may, or may not, be employees of a large security agency. They may also be employees of a public agency such as the Philadelphia Housing Authority or the City of Philadelphia. They may also use the commission as freelance neighborhood patrolmen. ( 4) State Property Police:

This kind of policeman is limited at this time to the security force of Temple University. Temple is per­mitted, under State Act #149, 1968, to operate its own security force. These non-commissioned police have powers which are peculiar to this force and they are also subjected to controls which are peculiar to this force.

How Many Private Police Are There? The only answer to this question is "who knows".

It is generally agreed that the business of providing security service is one of the fastest growing industries in the country. National crime protection industries such as William J. Burns, Globe Security, Pinkerton's, Inc., and the Wackenhut Corporation claim growth rates of 10-40% nationally. This growth rate, and there is no reason to doubt the claims, compounds the problem of estimating numbers. This problem is caused by the fact that there is absolutely no public record of the security forces of any of the companies which sim­ply operate their own force. Since this information is considered classified by the companies there is no way to even give an educated guess about the numbers

29

that may be in this category. There are, however, figures which give some idea of

the really fantastic numbers of people involved. As of June, 1970, the County Detective's Office recorded 16,079 employees of those agencies which operate un­der the private detective license. Four security agen­cies in Philadelphia have more than 1000 employees each. The vast majority of these employees will be pri­vate guards rather than private detectives since far more manpower is demanded in this field and the agencies with the really large staffs all supply guard service.

We can add to this figure the security force at Tem­ple which numbers approximately 130 and we can add those who possess the watchman or patrolman com­mission. There are approximately 200 commissioned watchmen and patrolmen who are not working for one of the registered agencies. This brings the total of registered private police to more than 1 ,400.

Are There Requirements For Becoming A Private Policeman?

We have noted that the original applicant for the license of a private detective must meet certain require­ments. The only mandatory requirement for any of the personnel who are then hired by this licensed direc­tor is, however, that no employee shall have been con­victed of a felony. Security agencies presently direct all potential employees to the Police Administration Building for fingerprinting or they do this themselves and check with both the local and the State Police to check the applicant's record. There are no figures avail­able to indicate the number of applicants which are prevented from working in security agencies for this reason and there is no mechanism for any kind of of­ficial review of this process.

The stores and companies with their own security forces tend to check all applicants for the existence of a criminal record also, but they do this at their own dis­cretion and with no accountability.

The Police Department also checks for a record before granting a commission and, out of the 15% of applicants who were denied commissions in the year 1969-70, the primary reason was the existence of a record.

The Police Department also denies the patrolman's commission for the one other requirement which is fre­quently found in this field, proficiency in the use of weapons. The Police administer their test at the Police Academy but many of the security agencies who pro­fess to have a testing procedure for ability to use weapons will simply have the applicant fire rounds in the basement or some other similarly informal setting.

Some agencies prefer to hire people with experience in security work and there is a very high rate of "swap­ping" among agencies. Military experience is taken into consideration by many employers. Some knowledge of criminal law is mentioned as being a factor to consider by some personnel officers in security agencies.

30

In general, however, there are very, very few require­ments and this is evident in the caliber of person hired. In 1969, a study of the security guards of the Philadel­phia Housing Authority showed an average education level of grade 9, previous experience with at least one and often two or three security agencies for all but a few guards, and previous employment primarily in very undemanding jobs such as delivery men. Although this study cannot be applied to all security personnel, it is certainly of interest and it is indicative of what can, and possibly often does, happen as the result of the lack of requirements for security positions.

Other Factors Which Determine Quality Of Private Police:

Training programs: There is a great deal of variation in trammg pro­

grams. Many agencies require their employees to attend several sessions on criminal law and criminal procedure. The sessions are normally conducted by the agency's own staff and the accuracy and adequacy of the infor­mation are open to question. On-going in-service pro­grams are extremely rare and the general rule is that new employees are assigned to a superior officer for the probationary period. The rate of failure from this period of probation is not known and a really extensive research study of the agencies might yield some faci­nating information.

There are two exceptions to the lack of training programs. All of the agencies which use dogs will have a special program for all officers in the canine corps. This is often a nationally operated training center and local personnel are sent to a special course run by the agency.

Both of the major local universities have far more ex­tensive training programs than the agencies. Security guards at both Temple and Penn go through programs which include community relations, psychology, and other intangible aspects of police work. They use the Police Guidance Manual as their reference and they are taught far more criminal law than is evident in other programs. There is an emphasis on recent develop­ments in interpretations of civil liberties and civil rights . No one really knows how effective these efforts are-it may be that training is less of a determinant than the quality of the supervision-and a study of the attitudes of the guards, students, and administrative staff at the universities would be interesting. Low Salary Levels:

It is not at all uncommon for security agencies to pay only minimum wage and few agencies pay more than $2.00/ hour to their rank and file guards. Exceptions to this occur in both universities and in the Housing Authority where the salary range is $3.00-$4.00/ hour. Agencies do pay higher salaries to their specially trained personnel such as the canine corps and the senior officers receive higher salaries, but, in general, the wage scales are low. Guards are unionized in many plants and the International Union of the United Plant Guards

LAW ALUMNI JOURNAL

of America claims 100% wage increases in the last ten years but at this time security agencies are not competi­tive with even most semi-skilled salary scales.

Does All This Lead To A Vast Army Of Untrained Para-Policemen?

It is really very difficult to estimate the degree to which private police are operating in a semi-professional or even professional police style. For instance, no one really knows how many private police are armed. Some sources insist that fewer than 10% of the private guards are armed but estimates vary a great deal and there is no way of really checking these figures.

In Philadelphia, the ease of obtaining a permit to carry concealed weapons has been significantly reduced and the Department of Licenses and Inspections, which reviews all applications for permits, maintains strict standards for issuance. The legislation for these re­strictions is being challenged, however, and this regu­latory mechanism may not be allowed to stand. Even with this regulation, we still find that all of the guards who have the commissions from the city police, and the security force for Temple University are all armed if they have passed whatever probationary period their particular employer deems to be adequate.

It may not be possible to estimate the number of armed guards but it is easy to get a fairly accurate pic­ture of the wide variety of situations in which guards are armed. While preparing this study, I found armed guards in city hospitals, city playgrounds, private and public schools, public and private colleges, low-income housing projects, luxury apartment buildings, residential associations of suburban homeowners, chain stores, factories, warehouses, etc. etc.

Many of these places also use dogs and several agen­cies supply dogs. They also supply various kinds of communication equipment and various kinds of patrol vehicles. The degree of the sophistication of these tools varies tremendously. There are guard agencies in which the guards have dogs, police radios, walkie talkies of the most elaborate kind, and wagons or cars for patrol. There are others in which the guard may have only a rudimentary walkie talkie. The extent of the profession­alization of guards is increasing-especially in agencies which have adopted many characteristic features of military organization in their staff structuring and oper­ating procedures.

One of the main services which security agencies provide is quite distinct from that of the public police. This is the provision of electronic protection devices. Many companies prefer to install elaborate equipment to reduce the expenses of continuous guard service. This equipment varies tremendously. There are closed circuit TV cameras, motion detectors , electronic beams, radar systems, telephone monitoring systems, and many warn­ing systems. The installation and operation of these devices is one of the main sources of revenue for the large security agencies and it is perhaps one of the few limiting factors reducing the numbers of guards which

Fall 1971

might otherwise be considered necessary.

How Do The Para-Policemen Relate To The City Police?

One of the first elements of this relationship which becomes obvious as soon as either the police themselves or security guards start to talk is the sense of inferiority which many private guards have. There are many guards who resent the fact that they do not have the same powers as the police themselves and these feelings are aggravated by the taunting of the children in the vicinity of known guard limits such as the boundaries of Hous­ing Authority Projects. Many guards who are author­ized by a commission or a license to carry weapons only on specified premises ignore these restrictions and they wear their guns regularly, whether they are in uniform or not. This is often because guards are afraid that people they have arrested or punished are out to get even with them. Guards discuss this constantly and there are innumerable stories of their fellow guards who have been ambushed, attacked or robbed. Their fears are probably not groundless but their insistence that the answer to the problem is to simply play policeman and carry a gun everywhere is open to question.

Guards are dependent on the police in many ways­normally the police are called for the actual transporta­tion of the defendant to the police station. The relation­ship between guards and police varies a great deal­often the police react to the presence of a security force in an area by reducing their patrols there or even stop­ping them altogether. At times, this may be because of a tacit agreement between the security forces and the police-e.g., at Penn and at Temple, the police only go in on the request of the director of security.

There are many other occasions though, in which there is no such understanding, and in which the security force is not nearly adequate in meeting all the situations which regularly arise. In public housing projects, many tenants contend that the police either do not come at all in an­swer to calls from tenants about muggings, robberies, burglaries etc., or they arrive in busloads in answer to calls from the guards or the management.

There are no written rules which define the relation­ship between the metropolitan police and security guards. There are some areas in which there seems to be a very good working relationship and this is often due to the personality of the director of security or the man­ager of the company or housing project. The police seem to respond favorably, both in their routine patrols and in their provision of special services, when the direc­tor or the manager has established a direct relationship with the District Supervisor. Unless there is a pressure from superior officers for cooperation with security forces , most policemen would probably prefer to 'leave it to the guards'. At the same time as the police want to 'leave it to the guards' they will also bitterly resent it when the guards respond by playing police, and the relationship between the two could be improved a great deal if some understanding of their respective roles were possible.

31

.r~------------------------------------------

How Much Authority Do The Private Police Actually Have?

One way of approaching the answer to this question is by defining the powers of arrest. The confusion which surrounds this issue is total. There are obviously many fine points of legal terminology involved and there are also endless varieties of opinions which range from vir­tual myth to exact legal definition. The variety of respon­ses which occur to all questions about the police power of private police is incredible. Questions such as what constitutes an arrest or a detention, what rights do private police have which they would not also have simply as private citizens, what is 'reasonable cause', what is 'reasonable time'--none of these questions will be an­swered with any degree of consistency or accuracy by even the experts in the field.

Much of this variation can be attributed to the vari­ation in the kinds of situations which regularly occur. In some cases, guards call for police assistance before they take any action themselves. In others, they may hold the suspect for the police or even take the suspect to the station. They may hold suspects for questioning and/ or "disciplining" without ever calling the police or they might report the incident to the police and later swear to an affidavit at the police station. There are innumerable ways in which security guards may operate and it is un­fortunate that it is virtually impossible to really docu­ment cases.

This lack of documentation plagues the study of pri­vate police throughout. Most of the cases which involve private police are shoplifting cases or some other kind of summary offense and these cases are normally settled at the level of the Divisional courts--with no central record­ing system. Until recently, there were no court records for summary offenses other than the police documents and other unofficial records.

Consequently, unless an extremely detailed study of the files of all of the Divisional Courts could be made, there will not be the kind of statistical support for theories which is normally required for scholarly studies.

There are no statistics--there are only verbal accounts and these may or may not be accurate. If they are accurate, there is a very informal system of street justice operating in the Divisional courts . If a judge thinks that the private policeman has overstepped his authority in the arrest, he will simply drop some of the charges or dismiss the case. He will also dismiss the case if the plaintiff is not present and many stores and companies do not bother to send representatives to all the court hearings which concern their property.

Even with the absence of real data on the subject, it would seem that there should at least be a substantive body of legal literature and cases in higher courts. For some reason, this isn't true. There are a very few cases which involve private police which are appealed to higher courts. In view of the tremendous number of cases which challenge the rights and responsibilities of the public police, it is very hard to even guess why there are

32

not more cases concerning private police--perhaps the 'street justice' system is adequate, perhaps the expense of appeal is prohibitive, perhaps the minor nature of most cases does not warrant appeal--one can make many guesses but no assertions.

There are two cases in Pennsylvania which define the arrest powers of those private police who hold the license of a Private Detective. The first is a case in Berks County in which the private detective's appli­cation for the renewal of his license was under question because of allegations of misconduct and abuse of authority--License of Niehoff , 9 D & C 2d, 410. In this case it is clearly stated that the present Private De­tective Act does not confer upon the recipient of the license any powers which are greater than those of any private citizen. They do not have the right to serve warrants in criminal cases nor should they be concerned with the outcome of the cases which they have investi­gated except as witnesses.

This seems to be the standing decision on this matter but it doesn't seem to have had any effect on the beliefs or the policies of any of the people in the security business and it was never referred to by any of the per­sons contacted during this study. The second case is also one concerning the renewal of a private detective license and it too addresses itself to the private police powers. It occurred in Philadelphia. The Court of Quarter Sessions had suspended the license of someone on the grounds that one may not maintain the private detective status at the same time as one is serving as a constable. In this case, Re Stanley , 204 Pa. Super. 29, the Superior Court upheld the decision of the lower courts. Its reasons were that the constable has authority not possessed by the private policeman--the authority to "execute warrants of arrest, to arrest on sight for the breach of the peace, vagrancy and drunkenness, and to carry a deadly weapon concealed". None of these rights are conferred upon the private citizen and the Private Detective must be considered as a private citizen. If a private policeman possessed these powers by virtue of another position it was considered to be a grave risk of the abuse of powers. This case does not seem to have had any effect on the security personnel either and it is probably unpublicized.

Unfortunately, there aren't any cases at all which define the powers of either the watchmen and patrolmen com­missioned by the police or the campus police at Temple. The only other kind of case which one can turn to on this subject are cases which are based on the Pennsyl­vania shoplifting regulations. The state shoplifting act was passed in 1957 and amended in 1967, (Purdon's Penna. Stat. Ann. 18 §4816: 1). It defines a shoplifter as "any person wilfully concealing merchandise, un­purchased goods, either on or off the premises" and it states that such persons "may be detained in a reason­able manner, for a reasonable length of time by a peace officer, a merchant or a merchant's employee in order that the recovery be effected". "Such detention shall not render such peace officer, merchant or merchant's

LAW ALUMNI JOURNAL

employee criminally or civilly liable for false arrest, false imprisonment or unlawful detention."

One would think that this statute would have been challenged immediately and frequently. It seems to be a carte blanche to store owners and their hired detectives and one would think that there would have been many appeals in shoplifting cases to curb this apparently unre­stricted authority. There are a few, but not many and there certainly haven't been substantive changes in store policies or suggested legislative reforms as a result of the pitifully few cases.

In one 1967 case in Lackawanna County, Murphy v Cleland Simpson Co., Inc. 68, Lakawanna Jurist, 58, 1967, a woman was awarded substantial damages in a suit against a department store for several charges includ­ing false imprisonment, invasion of privacy, and slander. It was a jury case and the jury decided that the detention had not been for a reasonable length of time and it was not done in a reasonable manner. The question of the limitations on the authorizations under the shoplifting statute was discussed. The exemption from liability was also discussed-the plaintiff had signed one of the release or confession forms which are frequently used by stores in shoplifting cases. These forms vary , and the permissible varieties of release forms were not an issue in the case but the manner of using a release form was. It was de­cided that any form which was signed by the defendant before all of the charges and other information were filled in by the store employees was an invalid release. When the defendant is not aware of the charges, when. the defendant is only told to sign a form which will en­able him/ her to leave, this constitutes a coerced confes­sion according to the jury in this case.

Again, it is impossible to assess the effect of this de­cision on store policies or on subsequent court decisions. It seems that the stores may be more influenced by the actions of judges in the lower courts than they are by major decisions, and the practices of the judges seem to be based more on individual interpretations of justice or decency than on legal precedents.

Aren't Private Police Subject To The Same Control As Public Police?

Although it seems incredible, the plain answer to this question is 'no'. The regulations which are applied to govern the actions of the public agencies as they affect the civil rights and liberties of all people cannot be ap­plied to the actions of private agencies according to the standing legal decisions at this time.

In Weyandt v Masons Stores, 279 F.Supp. 283 D.C. ( 1968) a Federal District Court dealt with this issue in a shoplifting case. The plantiff asserted that she had been deprived of several constitutional rights by the private detectives who had arrested her for shoplifting. The court based its decision on the fact that the actions of a private detective agency could not be classified as actions by a public agency, the private agency does not operate "under color of state law". The court held that the rules which

Fall 1971

govern the agencies which act "under color of state law" would not apply to private agencies and that no violation of civil liberties could be claimed against the private agency. This is the only case which was found during this research which is specifically concerned with the questions of procedural safeguards to protect civil liberties of people arrested for shoplifting-perhaps further re­search might reveal others but there is still an astonish­ing paucity of cases.

There are, however, cases which are concerned with other practices of private agencies as they affect civil liberties and the decisions have been the same. On the question of whether the 'right to privacy' must be ob­served by private agencies , the standing decision at this time is that of Burdeau v. McDowell. In this case, 256 US 405 (1921), the Supreme Court held that the provi­sions of the fourth amendment apply only to govern­mental agencies and that private citizens may not be held subject to the controls of unlawful search and seiz­ure. Since the courts classify the actions of detective agencies as private actions, the implications of this case are obvious.

It may be, however, that the implications of these de­cisions are far more alarming than the actual situation. The apparent open invitations to private agencies for abuse of civil rights are probably controlled to some degree by other societal mechanisms. One of these mechanisms has already been mentioned-the tendency of judges in the lower courts to dismiss charges against defendants when the methods used in making the arrest or obtaining the evidence indicate obvious violations of civil liberties. Another is the ability of the agency which regulates the allocation of detective licenses to withhold licenses from applicants whose practices are in violation of civil liberties. There are several cases in which this has occurred. None of these are in Pennsylvania but there are undoubtedly instances in which licenses have been denied for this reason which were not appealed and therefore are not present in the literature. Obviously this method of regulating the practices of private detec­tive agencies is possible only in those states in which there are licensing procedures and only when the re­quirements for licenses are enforced uniformly and effi­ciently.

As we have seen, this is not the case even in Philadel­phia where there are opportunities for regulation which do not exist in most states. There are several procedures for licensing private police in Philadelphia and there are several agencies which are responsible for this.

However, none of these controls can be said to be adequate. Many private security forces are exempt from any license requirement. The control over private agencies is minimal and there should be major reforms in many of the activities of security agencies-in stand­ards for personnel, for training, for weapons control, and for performance standards. The demand for reforms in this area must come from an educated public and an enlightened legal community.

33

Curriculun1 (Continued from page 5)

and is applied in daily life." Surely this is not the way to produce an effective

dispute-adjuster or a skillful appraiser-appriser. The enrollees should be taught the law which most of the practicing attorneys graduated from that caliber of in­stitution have to know or are likely to come in contact with during the early years of their professional careers . They should be given opportunities to observe, practice and assess prediction exercises and techniques (the law school being a proving ground as well as a training center).

Finally, they should learn and be encouraged to develop the skills of arranging, manipulating, explain­ing, emphasizing and presenting rules of law and ques­tions of fact to clients, juries, and judges. To do other­wise, is to do a disservice to the enrollee's future em­ployer and prospective clients. To do otherwise is to send the enrollee out as less of an asset and more of a liability. In the words of Llewellyn in the The Bramble Bush:

"As an advocate, you must be a good technician, for when you slip, it is your client who falls." (and a senior partner who calls)

"Hunching is vital to your practice. Y otir dient pays you to hunch right. Of course, he pays you too, if you hunch wrong. Once." Summer or part-time legal jobs should not prove to

be startling and sobering experiences. The law school experience should not delude or beguile.

In Courts on Trial Frank described "the Pickitup Theory of training" as follows.

"It is often said that it will do no harm to leave the law student ignorant of a large part of the facts in the legal world he will later enter, that he can learn those facts after his graduation. That argument comes to this : Have the student spend three long years being mis-educated-i.e., receiv­ing erroneous impressions about the ways in which many courts and lawyers behave-because he will be able to dissipate those impressions sub­sequently."

Tis the stuff that breeds disillusionment with formal education.

A good legal education is a useful one. Valuable learning, is learning that can be used.

The law school should be training and producing young lawyers, not merely equipping enrollees to be trained at some later time, under unpredictable and un­controllable circumstances, and at someone else's ex­pense. The acquisition and development of the skills and arts of the practioner should not be left to the early years of practice. An enrollee should be trained with

34

a goal in mind, proficiency in practice. And the earlier in his career he attains a fair degree of proficiency, the better. Judge Edward A. Tamm of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia has com­mented on the problem of inexperienced and ill­informed advocacy:

"The average young practitioner appearing be­fore me has no concept as to how to make an opening statement. He is unable briefly to sum­marize his case to the jury. He has no idea as to how to request a bench conference. He has no concept as to when or how or why he submits re­quests for instructions to the jury, and his closing argument is generally based on something that apparently he heard on a very inferior television program.

It is shocking to me to have young lawyers ap­proach the bench and say, 'Your Honor, I want you to know that this is not only the first case I have ever tried, but this is the first time I have ever been in a real courtroom.'" Proficiency in advocacy, planning, drafting, negotiat­

ing, counselling, fact-gathering, dispute-adjusting, per­suading and predicting is not acquired during a three­year tutelage. However, those three years can do much to send an enrollee up the road to its attainment. The objective of "lawyer education" should be to ensure that the graduate has covered a substantial distance along that road upon entry into practice and is pre­pared to cover the remaining ground at a swift but sure pace (rather than an uphill struggle or a path marked by unidentified pitfalls) . In defining what an enrollee should be or become, the law school must be concerned with what he or she is able to do. In the words of Clarence Morris in How Lawyers Think:

"Clients have specific problems and want con­crete solutions. If a client wants a business unit organized, he is not academically interested in all enterprises or types of organization. He does not want to buy a treatise. He wants the services of an organizer who will arrive at the suitable or­ganization for his needs." Frank wrote that university law schooling is sup­

posed to teach men what they are to do in court rooms and law offices. He was not advocating a plan for legal education which would produce mere legal technicians, but was calling for a change from what he viewed as the "library-law school" orientation. He advocated "lawyer-schools" and more learning by observing and doing. He viewed law school as "a sort of sublimated law office". He noted that abstract theory divorced from concrete practical interests is usually dull ; that the difference between his proposals and Langdell's method was "like the difference between kissing a girl and read­ing a treatise on osculation." In Courts On Trial he asked :

"Why does what we teach as 'law' so little re­semble 'law' as practiced? . .. . without giving up entirely the case-method and without discarding

LAW ALUMNI JOURNAL

the invaluable alliance with the so-called 'social sciences' , our law schoois should once more bring themselves into close contact with what clients need and what courts and lawyers actually do." Professor Megarry wrote along the same line of

thought in Law As Taught and Law As Practiced: "What I do propose is that in the approach to

the subjects taught in the law schools there ought to be some greater degree of approximation bet­ween law as taught and law as practiced ...

The teaching of medicine and surgery would not be improved if it were carried on in relation to some species of idealized human body. instead of our vile and earthly frames. There must be no denaturing of academic law so as to make it a pale image of the practice of the law." As the reader may well have gathered the thesis of

this paper is that the law student needs more practical experience with, and exposure to, actual legal problems, courts, and governmental agencies. As part of my func­tionally or vocationally oriented jurisprudence, I would emphasize the development of "lawyering skills" through the use of simulation techniques and "clinical" pro­grams. For, as I see it, the purpose of legal education is "lawyer education" and "lawyer education" is con­cerned with equipping one to appraise and apprise, to predict and persuade .... to practice law.

Kras (Continued from page 8)

Kras also points to a newly enacted Fairfax County, Va., ordinance which requires PUD developers to pro­vide a fixed minimum percentage of low and moderate income housing.

He adds that in the long run large scale projects with · only high income housing are just plain "economically unsound."

A hopeful sign the professor sees is the "self interest" of the private sector in mixed housing for POD's.

"The housing industry can't for long survive on small scale developments . . . and local resistance to planned unit development will be less because costs can be in­ternalized ... the planned unit development is going to be a very substantial factor in the future."

Kras also sees a shift of PUD control to "higher" re­gional regulatory agencies. "The larger the develop­ment, the less a local governing body is able to assess its impact on the broader region," he says.

We are fast approaching the day, Kras feels, when local authorities just won't have the technical compe­tence to assess the effects of large scale POD's on them­selves-much less their regions as wholes.

But Kras is hardly a man of theory alone. As a matter of fact his office is piled high with draft

Fall 1971

codes, articles, enabling legislation for this state and that, and reports from myriad study commissions with which he has worked.

If a visitor asks aBout his work with Commission X, a trip to an overstuffed cardboard box relegated to a position of honor under a nearby table brings forth a three inch report, four legislative drafts, two updates and a subsequent 100 page article for some scholarly journal.

The sheer amount of paper involved is frightening­not to mention the content.

But then being the father of anything-particularly some beast like the PUD concept-is not a burden to be taken lightly.

Over the past several years Kras's ministry in the gospel of the PUD has taken him all over the country. From 1967 to 1969 he served as assistant reporter for the American Law Institute's efforts at drafting a model land development code.

Following that came a stint as special consultant to the Maryland Planning and Zoning Law Study Commis­sion and then another special consultant plum with the New York State Office of Planning Coordination.

Planning and zoning law was being wiped out and revised up and down the east coast and Kras was in on the 'crime' almost every time.

And then there was a period as consultant to the Temporary Study Commission on the Future of the Adirondacks, and more proposed legislation.

Not forgetting his adopted state of Pennsylvania­which can match any of its 49 brethern in archaic laws of any genre-Kras also works with the Advisory Com­mittee to the Commonwealth's Joint State Government Commission and has recently been appointed to the Governor's Advisory Council on Housing.

Add to this major texts such as Ownership and De­velopment of Land (1965) and Housing and Urban Development (1969), technical bulletins for the Wash­ington-based Urban Land Institute on PUD's-which look like telephone books and have been adopted in part by the F.H.A.-and a few Model State Enabling Acts and it all starts to pile up.

Top it off with a first year property course, a course in housing and urban development, a seminar in land development and city planning, special offerings in real estate financing and development and a new Fall course in "Co-ops and Condominiums" and it's almost enough to make a man wish those good Holy Cross fathers in South Bend had never prevailed on him to teach prop­erty.

Almost. But then what did Knute Rockne and Frank Leahy ever know about planned unit developments.

Kirkpatrick (Continued from page 12)

hibit-perhaps this has deterred constructive considera-

35

tion of what is permitted. While there are antitrust problems inherent in any group self-regulation efforts, it is clear that self-regulation by individual companies of their own activities carries few, if any, antitrust perils. This is a form of self-regulation which can be under­taken by a business with 100% effectiveness.

Alulllni Day (Continued from page 6)

what is legal education doing to give the consumer some say over what happens to him?" and responded to his own question by answering "Very little."

Warning that a kind of professional elitism is develop­ing in law schools and public interest firms which bodes ill for any new world consumerism, Sparer commented: "The test is not whether Ralph Nader or any other per­son or firm is leading the struggle. The test is whether or not the thrust is directed toward building constituen­cies of people who are affected, who will be able to call the shots on what's going on.

"The real question is 'Who should decide the issues?' " Taking up a similar theme, Professor Bruce Ackerman

said that the current environmental programs redound mainly to the benefit of the middle class.

"If you were a poor person, what would your priorities be? 1) Garbage; 2) Air; 3) Noise and 4) Water pollu­tion.

"And where is the money going?" he asked. "To water pollution. So the poor are to a significant degree paying for the interests of the rich."

Addressing himself to the problems of housing, Pro­fessor Jan Z. Krasnowiecki said: "We cannot rely on the private litigation process to solve this problem unless some people get into it who think they know best what is good for the low income consumer. People who have an interest are not able to organize themselves to represent themselves properly for the kind of problems they have to overcome.

"The only other solution," he said, "would be to re­structure the location of the power so as to regionalize the regulatory system-but this is very difficult to do."

Finally, Professor John Stedman said that attempts are being made to bring consumerism into other areas of the law.

"Those of us in these other areas like to think that in some small degree we are doing our part," he remarked.

The business meeting included reports from both the president of the Law Alumni Society, William F. Hy­land, and Dean Bernard Wolfman, who described the new program leading to a J.D. and a Ph.D. in law and policy planning.

Elections of officers and the Board of Managers for the coming year were followed by cocktails and supper­a pleasant conclusion to an eventful day.

36

Law Alumni Day, April 22, was the occasion for the reelection of all five of the Law Alumni Society's officers. A list of the officers who were reelected for the 1971-72 term and a complete listing of the members of the Board of Managers of the Society, excluding ex officio members, appears below:

OFFICERS

President

William F. Hyland, Esq., L'49 499 Cooper Landing Road Cherry Hill, N.J. 08034

First Vice President

Joseph P. Flanagan, Jr., Esq., L'52 1035 Land Title Building Philadelphia, Pa. 19110

Second Vice-President

Edwin P. Rome, Esq., L'40 1100 Four Penn Center Plaza Philadelphia, Pa. 19103

Secretary

Thomas N. O'Neill, Jr., Esq., L'53 20th Floor, Three Parkway Philadelphia, Pa. 19102

Treasurer

Joseph N. Bongiovanni, Jr., Esq., L'43 1020 The Fidelity Building Philadelphia, Pa. 19109

BOARD OF MANAGERS

John L. McDonald, Esq., L'40 1500 United Penn Bank Building Wilkes-Barre, Pa. 18701

Hon. D. Donald Jamieson, L'50 688 City Hall Philadelphia, Pa. 19107

David H. Marion, Esq., L'63 2600 The Fidelity Building Philadelphia, Pa. 19109

Robert A. Hauslohner, Esq., L'50 1900 Packard Building Philadelphia, Pa. 19102

Francis B. Haas, Jr., Esq., L'51 Box 1166 Harrisburg, Pa. 17108

Thomas E. Wood, Esq., L'66 1100 Philadelphia National Bank Bldg. Philadelphia, Pa. 19107

Leonard L. Ettinger, Esq., L'38 1420 Walnut Street, 11th floor Philadelphia, Pa. 19102

William S. Hudders, Esq., L'29 27 North Seventh Street Allentown, Pa. 18101

William T. Leith, Esq., L'41 601 New Hampshire Avenue NW Washington, D.C. 20037

Edward I. Cutler, Esq., L'37 Exchange National Bank Building, 20 fl. Tampa, Florida 33601

LAW ALUMNI JOURNAL

Fall 1971

Hon. G . Fred DiBona, L'40 591 City Hall Philadelphia, Pa. 19107

G . William Shea, Esq., L'36 615 S. Flower Street Los Angeles, Cal. 90017

Arthur E. Newbold IV, Esq., L'67 1600 Three Penn Center Plaza Philadelphia, Pa. 19102

Marshall A . Bernstein, Esq., L'49 1000 Pennsylvania Lumbermens Bldg. Philadelphia, Pa. 19107

Joseph N . Bongiovanni , Jr., Esq. , L'43 1020 The Fidelity Building Philadelphia, Pa. 19109

'Raider' Chris White

'Raider' Larry Silverman

Hyland (Continued from page 48)

Harold Cramer has been appointed as Law Alumni representative on the Editorial Board of the General Alumni Society. Norma Shapiro will continue her splendid work as our representative on the Board of the Association of Alumnae, and Marvin Comisky will represent the law alumni on the Board of the General Alumni Society.

As indicated by these activities, the Law Alumni Society is endeavoring, with even renewed vigor, to fulfill its mission as an aid to the law school in accomplishing its educational purposes and in helping to continue the strong ties of professional and social friendship among its graduates.

Alumni Secretary: Katherine Merlin

37

38 LAW ALUMNI JOURNAL

NEWS NOTES Dean BERNARD WOLFMAN in April announced

creation of the nation's first program to offer a joint graduate degree in law and public policy, sponsored by the Law School and the Pels Center of Government, a division of the Wharton School of Finance and Com­merce. Students in the program will be able to earn both a J.D. and a Ph.D. in public policy analysis in four years, a process that previously took from six to seven years.

Dean Wolfman reports that the 1971 version of the old law school stand-by "Book Night" was "very suc­cessful." Featured was a discussion of Columbia Law School professor Telford Taylor's controversial offering "Nuremberg and Vietnam: An American Tragedy."

Professor Joseph Bishop of the Yale Law School joined panel moderator and Law School professor Noyes Leech and Professor Taylor.

New officers of the Order of the Coif include: Thomas N. O'Neill, '53, president; Norma L. Shapiro, '51, vice president; and Robert F. Maguire, '51 , secretary_­treasurer.

Dean Wolfman and Alumni Affairs director Lloyd Herrick remind alumni of the Law School that the school would be a worthy beneficiary of foundation assets from family or other private foundations that are considering or engaged in disposing of their assets.

They point out that a number of family and other private foundations are being terminated and their assets being transferred to charities such as educational institutions.

They add that a number of colleges have benefited handsomely from such arrangements and that a trans­fer of all or part of a foundation's assets can be arranged so that the objective of the foundation may be car­ried on and its name or the names of its founders perpetuated.

A representative of the alumni office staff is available to work with donors and trustees to effect dispositions which will benefit the foundation as well as the school.

NormaL. Shapiro, '51, will become the first woman member of the Law Advisory Board when she attends her initial meeting in the Fall. On the agenda for that meeting are the school's admissions policy-particularly minority admissions, and placement-with emphasis on the placement of women and other minority students.

The Board is chaired by Frederick L. Ballard, '42 and all members are associate trustees of the University.

Fall 1971

The participation of Law School alumni in the New York-London annual meeting of the American Bar Association was highlighted by a reception hosted by the Alumni Society on July 16 at the London home of Robert Montgomery Scott, '54.

The gathering was attended by over 240 alumni and their spouses and included Alumni Society President William Hyland and his wife; Vice President Joseph Flanagan and his wife; immediate past president of the Alumni Society and chancellor-elect of the Philadelphia Bar Association Harold Cramer and his wife; former A.B.A. president Bernard G. Segal and his wife; and Dean Bernard Wolfman and his wife.

Scott is personal aide to the American ambassador and formerly a partner in the Philadelphia firm of Montgomery, McCracken, Walker & Rhodes.

Dean Wolfman has announced the Owen J. Roberts Memorial Lecturers for 1972 and 1973 . Slated to deliver the 1972 address on March 2 is Anthony Lewis, New York Times columnist and London correspondent. Lewis is a former Nieman fellow and has covered the United States Supreme Court for the Times.

The retired Chief Judge of the U.S. Third Circuit Court of Appeals, William Hastie, will deliver the 1973 address.

The Council on Legal Education for Professional Responsibility has awarded a $37,000 grant to the Uni­versity's Health Law Project. The award covers a two year period and will be used principally to pay the salary of a lawyer to supervise the work of some 10 law students per year in a clinical service program con­ducted under the project's auspices.

The students will be part of the Health Law Seminar and will give direct service and representation on either prison health conditions or Medicare/Medicaid griev­ances, according to law school professor and project director Edward V. Sparer.

The clinical advocacy program is open to second and third year students. Students from the 1970-71 Health Law Seminar who participate will receive three credits for the program built around the clinical project. Stu­dents who did not take last year's seminar will partici­pate fully and receive the full 6 credits for the program.

The supervising lawyer, who will be responsible to Sparer and the Health Law Project staff director Sylvia Law, is Carl McConnell.

McConnell is a graduate of the Yale Law School and has served with the Redwood City, Calif. Legal Services Program.

39

r:

A new shrubbery planting around the Rebecca Ford­ham Memorial Fountain in the Law School courtyard comes as the result of a gift made for this special purpose by an anonymous donor.

Alumni as Deans: Burton L. Laub, '28, continues his stewardship of Dickinson Law School in Carlisle, Pennsylvania as does Dean Murray L. Schwartz, '49, at the U.C.L.A. Law School.

Errata in the same vein : The Spring issue of the Journal incorrectly stated that Rutgers-Newark Dean James C. N. Paul was a member of the Class of '59. He graduated from the law school in 1951.

More Errata: James H. Lyons, '47, now of Los Angeles, has noted that the University of Santa Clara is in no way connected with the University of California at Santa Clara.

Alumnus Lyons points out that the University of Santa Clara is a private institution and the oldest insti­tution of higher learning in California. He adds that it was founded as a college in 1851 by the Jesuit order at the site of the Mission Santa Clara which was estab­lished in 1777. The school is still both private and operated by the Jesuits.

And an Omission : Bruce Ackerman, the author of the incisive piece in the Spring Journal on the garbage crisis and the new technology, is-in addition to being a garbage expert-a member of the law school faculty .

The Directory The University of Pennsylvania LAW ALUMNI

DIRECTORY was published in April, 1971. Bound in an attractive hard cover, the Directory contains data on living graduates of the Law School in an alphabetical section, a geographical section, and a class section. Over fifteen hundred copies have been sold thus far.

If you do not have a directory, you may purchase one by writing or calling :

Law Alumni Office University of Pennsylvania Law School 3400 Chestnut Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104 Telephone : (215) 594-6321

The Price is $10. Checks should be made payable to University of Pennsylvania.

ALUMNI NOTES 1918

SIDNEY GRABOWSKI, of Scranton, Pa., was the recipient of an award for distinguished service to Buck­nell University during its annual alumni luncheon on May 29. A native of Poland, Grabowski was a member of the original Bucknell Alumni Council and served as president of the Bucknell Alumni Club of Scranton. He has served through more than four decades as gen­eral counsel, as a director and as president of the Polish Union of the United States.

1927 LAURENCE H. ELDREDGE, of Philadelphia, will become a professor of law at Hastings College of the Law, an affiliate of the University of California. All full-time professors at the school must be at least 65 years of age. Eldredge, who is the author of Modern Tort Problems and Trials of a Philadelphia Lawyer, is the only faculty member selected by Hastings in recent years from active practice.

1930 NORMAN J . KALCHEIM, of Philadelphia, chairman of the American Bar Association's White House Task Force Committee on Retirement and Employment, will represent the American Bar Association's Family Law Section at the White House Conference on Aging to be held in Washington in November. A past member of the Mayor's Advisory Committee on Aging, he has also served on the Committee on Public Welfare of the Health and Welfare Council and the Task Force on

40

Legislation of the Pennsylvania Citizens Council.

1933 JEROME L. MARKOVITZ, of Philadelphia, chairman of the class of 1933, reports that the annual class reunion was held on June 4 at the Blue Bell Inn, Blue Bell, Pa. Sixteen members of the class were in attendance.

1935 ARNOLD WINOKUR, of Washington, D. C., a mem­ber of the office of General Counsel of the U. S. Depart­ment of Agriculture, received the Department's Supe­rior Service Award in Program Administration during the annual honor awards ceremony held in Washington on May 18. Secretary of Agriculture Clifford Hardin made the presentation. LOUIS J. GOFFMAN, of Philadelphia, a member of the Philadelphia firm of Wolf, Block, Schorr and Solis­Cohen, has been elected a director of Provident Na­tional Corp., owner of Provident National Bank and Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Co. Goffman is a past chancellor of the Philadelphia Bar Association.

1936 SAMUEL M. TOLLEN, of Chester, Pa., has been elected president of the Delaware County Bar Asso­ciation.

1937 DAVID COHEN, of Philadelphia, former Philadelphia city councilman, entered the city's Democratic race for mayor, but withdrew from the primary race in favor of

LAW ALUMNI JOURNAL

U.S. Rep. William J. Green. State Rep. HARDY WILLIAMS, '57, also entered the race, but the winner was former police commissioner Frank L. Rizzo. BENJAMIN S. LOEWENSTEIN, of Philadelphia, a senior partner in the firm of Abrahams & Loewenstein, was elected president of the Jewish Community Rela­tions Council of Philadelphia. Other officials elected by the Council included LEONARD GOLDFINE, '41 and I. DAVID PINCUS, '43.

1940 FRANK C. P. McGLINN, of Philadelphia, senior vice president, The Fidelity Bank, has been appointed a member of the United States National Commission for the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) for a term ending in 1973. He was notified of his appointment by Secretary of State William P. Rogers.

1941 PETER F. PUGLIESE, and IDA ROSE PUGLIESE, '44, his wife, of Strafford, Pa., were both presented the annual Man of the Year award of the Trinity Chapter Knights of Columbus in ceremonies in Springfield, Pa. Pugliese is general counsel of the Bell Telephone Co. of Pennsylvania and the Diamond State Telephone Co. of Delaware. The award was conferred because of "their joint and individual efforts for church, community, arts and their common profession."

1943 MILES W. KIRKPATRICK, of Washington, D. C., chairman of the Federal Trade Commission, was a featured speaker at The Proprietary Association's 90th annual meeting at The Greenbrier, White Sulphur Springs, West Virginia, in May. The Proprietary Asso­ciation is the national trade association which represents manufacturers of advertised proprietary medicines.

1946 JOHN L. ESTERHAI, of Philadelphia, associate gen­eral counsel for the Penn Mutual Life Insurance Com-

Fall 1971

pany, has been elected Secretary of the company by its board of trustees.

1948 JOHN F. ZELLER, III, of Lewisburg, Pa., has become vice president for administration and finance of Buck­nell University. Formerly vice president for business and finance, his new title reflects his added duties in the field of administration, including alumni relations, public relations and development. HERBERT W. SALUS, JR., of Philadelphia, has been appointed a Judge of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County.

1949 LOUIS J. CARTER, of Lower Merion Township, Pa., has been appointed to the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission. He was formerly counsel to the PUC.

1950 JOHN S. REYNOLDS, of Philadelphia, was elected secretary, Insurance Company of North America. He joined INA in 1958 as an underwriting trainee in the Treaty Reinsurance Department and advanced to deputy underwriter and manager. He was elected assistant sec­retary in 1968.

1951 GERALD JONATHAN HAAS, of Philadelphia, was recently appointed consultant to the secretary of the Department of Labor and Industry in Pennsylvania in workmen's compensation matters. He was also elected vice president of the Philadelphia Region of United Synagogue of America. In addition to private practice, he serves as lecturer on Pennsylvania Workmen's Com­pensation Law & Practice at Temple University's Law School. HAROLD BERGER, of Philadelphia, has been elected a member of the International Academy of Astronautics which is headquartered in Paris. The academy is com­posed of persons from 29 nations who have distin­guished themselves in one of the fields of astronautics. Berger is international chairman of the Inter-American Bar Association Aerospace Law Committee and na­tional chairman of the Federal Bar Association Com­mittee on Aerospace Law. ROBERT F. MAGUIRE, of Philadelphia, assistant dean for graduate studies and business affairs at the Law School, announces the marriage of his daughter, Mary, toR. Gary Wallace, of Baltimore.

1953 ROBERT N. C. NIX, JR., of Philadelphia, a Judge of the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas, has been selected by the Pennsylvania Democratic party as a candidate for the Pennsylvania Supreme Court.

1954 ROBERT MONTGOMERY SCOTT, of London, Eng­land, hosted a reception given by the Law Alumni So­ciety for more than 240 alumni and spouses attending the American Bar Association Convention in July. Scott is a personal aide to U.S. Ambassador Walter Annenberg and formerly a partner in the Philadelphia firm of Montgomery. McCracken, Walker & Rhoads.

41

BARRY R. SPIEGEL, of Philadelphia, has become a member of the Philadelphia firm of Schnader, Harrison, Segal & Lewis.

1955 SAMUEL DIAMOND, of Philadelphia, announces the formation of the firm of Tate, Diamond, Polsky, Bauer & Ervin. Joining him in the firm are LEIGH W. BAUER, '62, and W. BOURNE RUTHRAUFF, '69.

1957 NORMAN M. REISMAN, of Glen Mills, Pa., has been named general counsel of Scott Paper Company. Fol­lowing service with the antitrust division of the U.S. Department of Justice and a private law firm, he joined Scott in 1959 as assistant legal counsel and has served as counsel for trade regulation and litigation and as assistant general counsel at Scott.

1958 CAROLYN ENGEL TEMIN, of Philadelphia, has be­come the first full time counsel to the Pennsylvania State Parole Board. Previously the Attorney General's office handled this work. Ms. Temin, formerly chief of the federal courts division for the Defender Associa­tion of Philadelphia, is the attorney who won the State Supreme Court decision striking down discriminatory sentencing for women in Pennsylvania. MARTINS. EVELEV, of Dearborn, Mich., who works with the Philco-Ford division of the Ford Motor Com­pany, is also involved in handling the Asia-Pacific area for the company.

1959 WILLIAM J. GEEN, of New York, has completed a new edition of Foreign Tax Credit, a portfolio published by Tax Management Incorporated of Washington, D. C. He serves as a special consultant to Tax Management and is a member of the New York firm of Chadbourne, Parke, Whiteside and Wolff.

1960 CHERI GAINES, of San Francisco, is teaching poverty law and serving as director of the Minority Curriculum Project at the Golden Gate College School of Law. DAVID S. SHRAGER, of Philadelphia, a partner in the firm of Parage & Shrager, was inducted as president of the Pennsylvania Trial Lawyers Association during the organization's annual convention in Atlantic City, N.J. LABERT B. MITCHELL, of Sumneytown, Pa., as­sistant vice president and associate counsel for The Pitcairn Company of Jenkintown, Pa., has been gradu­ated from the Program for Management Development of the Harvard University Graduate School of Business Administration.

1961 WILFRED F. LORRY, of Philadelphia, has announced the formation of the partnership of Lorry, Machles & Hymnowitz with offices at Two Penn Center Plaza. His partners are ARNOLD MACHLES, '63 and STEVEN HYMNOWITZ, '65.

42

1963 NORMAN ASHTON KLINGER, of Philadelphia, now practicing law in Philadelphia and Montgomery County, was elected commissioner at large of Plymouth Town­ship, Pa., unseating an incumbent by the largest vote in township history. He was recently appointed as Montgomery County chairman of the ABA Drug Abuse Education Program. JOHN H. McGRAIL, of Pittsburgh, Pa., has been elected assistant vice president, Trust Division, Pitts-

•

burgh National Bank. He was previously senior gen­eral services specialist and trust officer. ARNOLD B. COHEN, of Philadelphia, formerly with the firm of Mesirov, Gelman, Jaffe & Levin, has joined the faculty of the Villanova University School of Law.

1964 MARTIN F. ROBINSON, of Chicago, Ill., has be­come a partner in the firm of Leibman, Williams, Ben­net, Baird and Minow. ARTHUR F. STAUBITZ, of Chicago, Ill. , has become senior attorney in the Univac Division of Sperry Rand Corporation in Blue Bell, Pa.

1965 PETER S. LATHAM, of Washington, D.C., has be­come associated with the firm of Wachtel, Wiener & Ross. ALBERT C. OEHRLE, JR., of Norristown, Pa., an­nounces the opening of an office for the general practice of law at 409 Cherry Street in Norristown. THEODORE A. FLERON, of Baltimore, Md., has been promoted to counsel in the legal department of

LAW ALUMNI JOURNAL

Sun Life Insurance Company of America. Prior to joining Sun Life in 1970, Fleron was associated with John Hancock Mutual Life Company in New York City. JOSEPH G. J. CONNOLLY, of Philadelphia, form­erly assistant to the Solicitor General of the United States, has become a partner in the firm of Ewing and Cohen. WILLIAM H. EWING, of Philadelphia, formerly di­rector Consolidated Laws of Ethiopia, has become a partner in the firm of Ewing & Cohen. J. WILLIAM JOHNSON, of Huntington Bay, N.Y.,

Fall 1971

has been elected vice president of Long Island Trust Company, Garden City, N.Y., where he will be respon­sible for new business development in Nassau County. He was formerly employed by First National City Bank in New York.

1966 J. RICHARD GREENSTEIN, of Penn Valley, Pa., re­ceived a Master of Law degree from the New York University School of Law. In addition to being a part­ner in the firm of Steinberg, Greenstein, Richman & Price, Greenstein is the firm's tax specialist. RICHARD M. ZIMMERMAN, of New York, has been elected assistant vice president of Irving Trust Company, New York City. He is a trusts and estates specialist in the bank's personal trust department. HENRY D. CAVANNA, of New York City, is now a registered representative with Harris, Upham & Co. MORTON JOEL GOLDFEIN, of Morristown, N.J., announces the opening of offices for the general practice of law at 5 Maple A venue in Morristown. CHARLES B. BURR, II, of St. David's, Pa., has been serving as an assistant U.S. attorney, and was recently honored by the U.S. Department of Justice for his superior performance. JOEL WEISBERG, of Philadelphia, has been appointed Director of the Commonwealth Bureau of Consumer Protection in Pennsylvania by State Attorney General J. Shane Creamer. As director, he will be in charge of bureau offices in Philadelphia, Harrisburg, Scranton, Erie and Pittsburgh. He was previously special assistant attorney general in the Bureau and had also served as chief of the consumer law reform section of the Phila­delphia Community Legal Services.

1967 ARTHUR MAKADON, of Philadelphia, has been promoted to chief of the Major Case Division of the Philadelphia District Attorney's office. W. WILLIAM COHEN, of Philadelphia, chief of the policy and planning division of the Philadelphia District Attorney's Office, is also currently serving as project administrator of Safe Streets, Inc., the only federally funded gang control program in the nation. JOHN G. ABRAMO, of McDaniel Crest, Del., has been appointed assistant U.S. attorney. He previously worked as patent attorney for the Pennwalt Corp. ANDREW M. EPSTEIN, of East Windsor Township, N.J., and his wife Myra, a 1966 graduate of the College of Women, announce the birth of their first child, a daughter, Dana Hope, on November 1, 1970. Epstein is a research associate for the New Jersey Legislature Rules of Court Commission, and practices law in Eliz­abeth, N.J. JONATHAN M. STEIN, of Philadelphia, was ap­pointed chief of law reform at Community Legal Serv­ices, Inc. in Philadelphia. S. AHMED SARWANA, of Karachi, Pakistan, has formed the partnership of Abraham and Sarwana on the pattern of American law firms. He is also assistant

43

professor of law, teaching contracts and sales at Islamia Law College. ROBERT T. STERN, of Washington, D.C., has been serving as a trial attorney with the antitrust division of the U.S. Department of Justice. He was previously with the Norwalk-Stamford-Danbury Regional Legal Serv­ices, Inc. in Connecticut.

1968 JOHN H. VAN MERKENSTEIJN, RICHARD N. TOUB, AND BURTON K. HAINES, of London, are all with the London firm of Gottesman & Partners. PAULA ROSENTHAL, of San Francisco, has become assistant professor of law at Golden Gate College School of Law where she will teach family law and criminal law. PETER GREENBERG, of Philadelphia, has accepted an appointment as assistant professor of law at Case Western Reserve. He was formerly with Schnader, Harrison, Segal and Lewis.

1970 STEVEN YOSLOV, of Newark and Beach Haven, N.J., has announced his engagement to Chias Gordon, a graduate assistant at Temple University. A January wedding is planned. MARK SOLOMONS, of Washington, D.C., currently with the U.S. Department of Labor, is working toward an LL.M. at the George Washington University School of Law. DAVID STRAUS, of Alexandria, Va., continues to be the legal backbone of the U.S. Postal Service in Wash­ington. ROBERT KUPITS, of Philadelphia, has extended his clerkship with Philadelphia Common Pleas Court Judge Edward J. Bradley for another year. JOEL YUDSON, of Washington, D.C., is currently the star of the Federal Communications Commission's legal staff. JAMES NEHRIG BRYANT, of Philadelphia and "Pepper Zoo" fame, has become an assistant district attorney in Philadelphia.

1971 HARRY JACKSON, of Philadelphia, is currently an assistant district attorney in Philadelphia. STEVEN R. WAXMAN, of Philadelphia, was feted by the American Bar Association as their 150,000th mem­ber in special ceremonies in New York on July 5. He has been clerking for Judge Daniel H. Huyett of the Fed~ral District Court for Eastern District of Pennsyl­vania.

DAVID J. LESTER, of Philadelphia, is the administra­tor of the new Release-on-Recognizance (ROR) pro­gram of the Philadelphia Common Pleas and Municipal Courts. The $304,000 program is expected to save the city of Philadelphia more than $3 million a year.

While at the Law School, Lester organized a group of law students from area law schools to represent de­fendants at bail hearings when the Defender Associa­tion became unable to represent indigent clients because of a fiscal crisis. Lester was also the catalyst behind the Philadelphia Bonding Company, a non-profit bond­ing company designed to put professional bail bondsmen out of business. BRUCE LOUIS THALL, of Philadelphia, is the win­ner of the $250 first prize at the Law School in the 1971 Nathan Burkan Memorial Competition, sponsored by

the American Society of Composers, Authors and Pub­lishers. His paper, entitled "Popular Music, Plagiarism, and Copyright," has been entered in the national com­petition.

FACULTY & STAFF NOTES Professor GEORGE L. HASKINS delivered an ad­

dress entitled "Representative Government and the 'Bible Commonwealth' in Early Massachusetts," at the 50th anniversary of the Institute of Historical Research, University of London on July 9. The address dealt

44

with the development of law and legal institutions in that colony, particularly the fact that its government, al­though inspired by biblical precepts, did not become a theocracy because of deep-seated English legal tradi­tions running counter to authoritarianism.

LAW ALUMNI JOURNAL

Mr. Haskins also attended the annual meeting of the Selden Society, of which he is an Overseas Correspond­ent, on July 14, and was present at the opening session of the American Bar Association on the same day.

In June, he was elected to appointed membership in the Societe Internationale pour !'Etude de la Philosophie Medievale (Belgium).

Dean BERNARD WOLFMAN expresses his own deep regret and that of the faculty at the School's loss of three cherished faculty members whose resigna­tion was effective on June 30.

Professor MORRIS L. COHEN, has left the Law School to become Law Librarian at the Harvard Uni­versity School of Law. He had been on the faculty since 1963. In late Spring, Mr. Cohen testified before the House and Senate Education Subcommittees in con-

nection with pending legislation on higher education. Currently president of the American Association of Law Libraries, Mr. Cohen joined with representatives of the Association of American Law Schools and the American Bar Association in presenting proposals for expanded Federal assistance to legal education.

Former Professor JOHN HONNOLD, who was Wil­liam A. Schnader Professor of Commercial Law, has left the law school to serve as chief of the International Trade Law Branch of the United Nations. He had been on a leave of absenc(;) from the Law SGhool to the United Nations since 1969.

A member of the Law School faculty since 1946, he

Fall 1971

is the author of The Life of the Law: Readings on the Growth of Legal Institutions (1964) and of Unification of the Law Governing International Sales of Goods ( 1966), as well as a casebook on Sales and Sales Fi­nancing. He is also co-author of a casebook on Con­stitutional Law and one on Commerical Law.

Former Professor HENRY RUTH, who was also on

45

leave of absence from the Law School, has left to head the Criminal Justice Coordinating Council in the city of New York.

WILLIAM E. NELSON, formerly clerk to U.S. Supreme Court Justice Byron White, has been ap­pointed assistant professor of law. He will teach History of American Law since the Revolution during the fall semester and Contracts during the spring semester. He will also direct a seminar on Law and Social Change in 20th Century America during the spring semester.

HOWARD I. KALODNER, a member of the New York University Law School faculty, will serve as visit­ing professor of law during the coming school year, teaching Urban Housing during the fall semester and Property and Environmental Law during the spring semester.

MIRJAN DAMASKA, a member of the law faculty of the University of Zagreb in Yugoslavia, will serve as visiting professor of comparative law during the spring semester. He held the same post at the Law School in 1966-67.

ISABEL STEWART, who has been at the Law School'since early 1971, has been appointed an admis­sions officer with primary responsibilities for recruit­ment and admission of minority students.

New Biddle Law Librarian is RICHARD SLOANE, formerly attorney in charge of the library of the New

46

York firm of Cravath, Swaine and Moore. A graduate of the City College of New York, Mr.

Sloane received a bachelor of science degree in library science from Columbia University in 1940. He has served as chairman of the business libraries committee of the American Bar Association's Section on Corpora­tion, Banking, and Business Law since 1967. He also serves as member of the ABA's Special Committee on Law Book Publishing Practices and was the editor of the ABA's Recommended Law Books.

Mr. Sloane, who is a member of the New York Bar, is presently serving as editor of a series of ten basic books on different legal subjects published by Federal Legal Publications.

Former Dean JEFFERSON B. FORDHAM, has re­turned to the Law School to assume his duties as Uni­versity Professor of Law, after a year as visiting uni­versity professor at the University of Utah. He has taken up his Law School residence in his former office in the Old Law School building-intact save for its distinctive spiral staircase.

Professor LOUIS B. SCHWARTZ participated in an aU-day conference on the Non-Medical Use of Drugs

sponsored by the Canadian Commission of Inquiry in Montreal in March.

Part-time instructors for the coming year include PHILIP A. BREGY, who will teach Will Drafting in the spring; MURRAY GERSTENHABER, who will teach Statistics for Law in the spring; ROBERT IN­MAN, who will teach Economics in the fall; JEROME

LAW ALUMNI JOURNAL

KURTZ, who will teach Estate and Gift Tax in the spring; LAWRENCE NEWMAN, who will teach Trusts in the fall; ARLEN SPECTER, who will teach a year­long prosecution seminar; PAUL TAUBMAN, who will teach Economics in the spring; JAMES D. CRAW­FORD, who will teach Trial of an Issue of Fact with Professor Levin in the spring; HENRY GELLER, who will teach Communications Law in the spring; LEON­ARD LEIMAN, who will teach Advanced Corporations with Professor Mundheim in the fall; JOHN G. HARK­INS, JR., who will teach Securities Regulation in the spring; and DAVID RUDOVSKY, who will teach Community Law and Criminal Litigation.

Professor ROBERT H. MUNDHEIM ·organized and edited with New York attorney Arthur Fleischer, Jr., the proceedings of the Second Annual Securities Regula­tion Institute. In May, he moderated a round table dis­cussion on the impact of the Institutional Investor Study on banks, whose participants included SEC Commis­sioner Richard B. Smith; the co-directors of the Presi­dent's Commission on Financial Institutions and rep­resentatives from the Federal Reserve Board. The discussion was sponsored by the Law School's Center for the Study of Financial Institutions, which Mundheim heads.

Mr. Mundheim also moderated a discussion of legal problems raised by negotiated commission rates at the Institutional Investor Block Traders Conference on June 19.

1900 MICHAEL J. LARKIN, Philadelphia. 1903 WILSON A. WERT, New Tripoli, Pa., February 6. 190S DAVID BORTIN, Philadelphia, March 3. 1908 HENRY P. NORRIS, West Chester, Pa., September 19,

1970. 1909 WILLIAM D. LONG, Philadelphia, February 27. 1910 REBECCA ROBERTS SHELLY, Norristown, Pa., February 16. 1911 HARRY SHAPERA, Pittsburgh, Pa., January 2S. 1912 CLARENCE E. YEAGER, Portland, Oregon, March 23. 1914 JAMES R. MAGEE, Gaithersburg, Md., December 31,

1970. 1921 ROLAND B. HAIG, Philadelphia, November 1S, 1970.

Fall 1971

Professor Mundheim

1924 WILLIAM C. FERGUSON, JR., Philadelphia, May 16. 1925 ALFRED G. MUENCH, Lancaster, Pa., March 9. 1926 HUGH J. MURTAGH, Abington, Pa., February 28, 1970. MORRIS H. GOLDSTEIN, Philadelphia, April 13 1928 EDWIN W. SEMANS, Narberth, Pa., March 18. 1929 EDWARD S. LOWER, Rosemont, Pa., February 3. NATHAN I. MILLER, Cynwyd, Pa., June 22. 1932 HON. THOMAS C. GAWTHROP, West Chester, Pa.,

February 2. CALVIN H. RANKIN, Philadelphia, April 27. 193S HENRY M. CANBY, Wilmington, Del., May 30. 1941 HERMAN S. DAVIS, Philadelphia, March 8. JOHN S. SPEICHER, Reading, Pa., October 22, 1970.

47

..----

William F. Hyland, '49

Alun1ni President's Message Attendance by more than 200 Law School

alumni and their guests at a reception in London during the American Bar Association meeting was one of the highlights of a busy year for the Law Alumni Society. The reception was hosted by Mr. and Mrs. Robert Montgomery Scott in their lovely home on Chester Square. Bob Scott, '54 is serving as Special Assistant to Ambassador Walter Annen­

berg, and his presence in Lon­don provided a fine opportunity for our gradu­ates to meet in a most unique and refreshing set­ting. Their de­light in being given that op­portunity was clearly estab­

lished by the capacity crowd that accepted the Scotts' kind invitation.

Earlier this year the Law Alumni Directory was distributed to subscribers. This exceedingly am­bitious undertaking, which could not have been completed successfully without the dedicated work of Harold Cramer, Joe Flanagan, Leonard Ettin­ger, Frank Haas, Lloyd Herrick, Jeff Fordham and Bernie Wolfman, has provided us with an excellent source of information about our fellow graduates. Arrangements to update the Directory periodically are already underway, and those who have not ordered a copy would find it useful to do so. The price is $10 and orders should be directed to the Law Alumni office at the law school.

The Law Alumni Society has been able to play a significant role in assuring the continued support and success of the Owen J. Roberts' Memorial Lecture Series which, until now, has been spon­sored by the Order of the Coif. Inflation being what it is, that organization's resources simply became inadequate to permit the series to be

3400 ~HESTNUT STREET PHICADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA 19104 RETURN REQUESTED

continued at its traditionally high level of excel­lence. The Society is fortunate to have had the opportunity to make such a worthwhile contribu­tion to the academic program of the law school community by joining with the Order of the Coif in co-sponsoring this important series.

Regional alumni meetings in Atlantic City and Washington, D. C. were attended by officers of the Society. It has been encouraging to see these gatherings grow in size and enthusiasm. The Board of Managers would be interested in assisting alumni in various parts of the country to create such regional groups where they presently do not exist.

Arthur E. Newbold IV, Marshall Bernstein, and Judge Theodore 0. Rogers are the most re­cently elected members of the Board of Managers. At a meeting held in May, the new members were welcomed to the official family and will be partici­pating in the work of the various committees to which assignments have been made for the coming year. Among these committees is a group headed by Joe Flanagan which has assumed responsibility for a complete review of the Constitution and By­Laws of the Society. Dave Marion and Norma Shapiro are also on this committee. Their report will be presented to the Board of Managers in the Fall, and those recommendations accepted by the Board will be submitted for appropriate action by the general membership at the Annual Meeting of the Society next Spring.

The Distinguished Service Award Committee for the coming year consists of Henry T. Reath as chairman, Harold Cramer, Marshall Bernstein, Bob Hauslohner, Walter Read, Sharon Wallis and Carroll Wetzel.

Because of the expanding activities of the Soci­ety, Leonard L. Ettinger has been requested to head a committee to study the Society's financial needs and the manner in which those needs are to be met. Joseph Bongiovanni, Bob Hauslohner and Tom O'Neill are also members of this committee.

(Continued on page 37)

Non-Profit Org.

U. S. Postage

PAID

Permit No. 2147 Philadelphia, Pa.