15
Preventing Carbon Lock-in David G. Hawkins, NRDC Robert H. Williams, Princeton January 2005

Preventing Carbon Lock-in

  • Upload
    taber

  • View
    19

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Preventing Carbon Lock-in. David G. Hawkins, NRDC Robert H. Williams, Princeton January 2005. Investments Today Drive Impacts Tomorrow. Temperature forcing drives impacts Concentrations drive forcing Emissions drive concentrations Investments drive emissions. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Preventing Carbon Lock-in

Preventing Carbon Lock-in

David G. Hawkins, NRDCRobert H. Williams, Princeton

January 2005

Page 2: Preventing Carbon Lock-in

2

Investments Today Drive Impacts Tomorrow

• Temperature forcing drives impacts

• Concentrations drive forcing

• Emissions drive concentrations

• Investments drive emissions

Page 3: Preventing Carbon Lock-in

3

Carbon Deficit Spending—Do the Math

• Energy carbon emissions in year 2000 = 6.3 billion metric tons

• Removal to oceans, soils, trees = 3.1 billion metric tons

• Net buildup in air = 3.2 billion metric tons

0

2

4

6

8

CarbonIn

CarbonOut

CarbonDebt

Annual Carbon Debt

Page 4: Preventing Carbon Lock-in

4

Emissions Drive Concentrations

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

450 550 650 750

ppm

Billion

ton

nes C

arb

on

19

00

-21

00

Page 5: Preventing Carbon Lock-in

5

The Budget is Disappearing

Cumulative carbon emissions 1900-2100 (GtC)

Budget for 450 ppm Stabilization

Today

531283

2010

375 439

2020

322492

2030

638 176

2040

809 5

Spent

Remaining

Page 6: Preventing Carbon Lock-in

6

Biggest Emitters 2000-2025

24%

15%

12%6%4%

4%

35%USAChinaWest EuropeRussiaI ndiaJ apanOther

Top six = 66%

Cumulative CO2 Emissions 2000-2025, EIA, IEA 2002

Page 7: Preventing Carbon Lock-in

7

Carbon Lock-inNew Fossil Units 2003-2030

1,391

1,883

237

0

500

1,000

1,500

2,000

GW

Coal Gas Oil

Source: IEA, WEO2004

Lifetime CarbonCoal = 145 GtCGas = 63 GtCOil = 2 GtC

Page 8: Preventing Carbon Lock-in

8

New Fossil Plant EmissionsRival Historic Totals

210

149134

0

50

100

150

200

250

1751-1974 All Sources

1975-2000 All Sources

New FossilPlants

LifetimeEmissions

Billion tonnes Carbon

Source: ORNL, CDIAC; IEA, WEO 2004

Page 9: Preventing Carbon Lock-in

9

New Coal Build by Decade

0

200

400

600

800

GW

Coa

l

Other Developing 43 90 128

India 16 48 79

China 150 168 226

Transition 1 11 19

OECD 12 184 218

2003-2010 2011-2020 2021-2030

Source: IEA,WEO 2004

221

500

670

Incremental new coal capacity by decade

Page 10: Preventing Carbon Lock-in

10

Fund CCS for New Coal in Developing Countries

• Industrialized countries (Annex II, OECD, G8, G8+) agree to finance incremental costs of IGCC with CCS for 10 years (2011-2020) in developing countries.

• Ramp in coverage: 2011=20% of new build; 20% increase each year.

• Cover full incremental cost of electricity (levelized capital and operating costs) for IGCC/CCS to 2020.

Page 11: Preventing Carbon Lock-in

11

Funding CCS for New Coal in Developing Countries

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

GW

Conventional PC

I GCC/ CCS

New CoalCapacity fromIEA, WEO 2004

251 GW out of306 GW usesCCS with fund

Page 12: Preventing Carbon Lock-in

12

Costs of CCS Fund• Levelized discounted costs = $6.2 billion/yr• Compare 2003 G7 ODA = $50 billion• But compare GEF = $3 billion for four yrs.

Costs derived from Foster Wheeler Study for IEA GHG Programme, May 2003

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020

Bil

lio

n $

/year

Annual Outlays Levelized Discounted Payments

Page 13: Preventing Carbon Lock-in

13

What About Industrialized Countries?

Applying the same CCS deployment schedule in industrialized countries results in 160GW of CCS capacity (out of 200GW coal forecast) with added costs of $3.9 billion per year.

Page 14: Preventing Carbon Lock-in

14

Costs in Context• $6.2 billion per yr = 0.5 mills/kwh if applied

to OECD generation. ($10.1 billion global program = 0.8 mills/kwh)

• Combining CCS fund with efficiency initiative can reduce costs and emissions more. If demand growth is cut from 3%/yr to 2.5%, CCS LDC program costs drop to $5.1 billion per yr.

• Enables avoidance of 36 billion tonnes carbon emissions just from initial covered capacity; much more with spillover benefits.

Page 15: Preventing Carbon Lock-in

15

Warming Won’t Wait. Will We?