11
presented to Performance Measures Session FDOT ITS Working Group Meeting, Tampa, FL presented by Kenny Voorhies, Cambridge Systematics March 20, 2008 Florida ITS Performance Measures Update

Presented to Performance Measures Session FDOT ITS Working Group Meeting, Tampa, FL presented by Kenny Voorhies, Cambridge Systematics March 20, 2008 Florida

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

presented to

Performance Measures Session

FDOT ITS Working Group Meeting, Tampa, FL

presented by

Kenny Voorhies, Cambridge Systematics

March 20, 2008

Florida ITS Performance Measures Update

Agenda

Incident Duration

• Highlights from last ITS working group meeting

• Progress report

• Action items

Travel Time Reliability

• Highlights from last ITS working group meeting

• Progress report

• Action items

Next steps

Incident DurationConcerns from Last Working Group Meeting

Actions of partner agencies will not be included in timeline• Time emergency vehicles arrive on the scene

• Incident investigation time by FHP

• FHP CAD system could be helpful for operations purposes

Initially, reporting of incident duration will likely differ among Districts• Roll out of SunGuide software

• Operators in different districts interpret the incident duration timestamps differently

Incident Duration Action Items

Review incident duration definitions with each District and fine-tune to resolve misinterpretations

Conduct pilot test for incident duration

• District 6

Plan for consistent training of operators across Districts

Conduct QA/QC of incident duration results across Districts to identify anomalies

Incident DurationProgress Report

Met with D6 SunGuide Transportation Management Center - March 10/11

Recommendations

• Document current SunGuide reports

• Provide validation of SunGuide reports

• Conduct Statewide Workshop

• Provide standard operating guidelines

• Conduct operations staff training on definitions

Travel Time ReliabilityConcerns from Last Working Group Meeting

Connection between speed data and reliability unclear

Method of calculating reliability not clear

Concern that since districts don’t have data for roadways before the implementation of ITS, it won’t be possible to quantify the full benefits of ITS

Travel Time Reliability Action Items

Conduct a reliability workshop with FDOT Districts to review FDOT definitions of reliability using actual data

Pilot test for travel time reliability in one district

Travel Time ReliabilityProgress Report

Met with D5 on February 12

Recommendations

• Create template for developing detector configuration file

• Create guidelines for detector quality and maintenance (statewide level)

• Define reporting templates

• Conduct training

Next Steps

Conduct Incident Duration Teleconference with Districts within next 4 weeks

• Review timeline and definitions

• Clarify expectations for this reporting cycle

• Discuss concerns

Conduct Reliability Teleconference within the next 2 months

• Review data and reporting

• Clarify expectations for this and next reporting cycles

• Discuss concerns

Next Steps (continued)

Central Office

• Develop and implement Incident Duration Performance Measures Policy

• Develop detector data quality guidelines

• Develop training materials and plan

• Begin compiling data for 07/08 report to FTC

Questions and Contact

Anita Vandervalk or Kenny Voorhies

[email protected]

[email protected]

Cambridge Systematics2457 Care Drive, Suite 101Tallahassee, Florida 32308