19
Plasmonic Enhancement of Single Methylene Blue Molecule Fluorescence Near Individual Gold Nanorods Tianchu Liang Optical Science Group NanoBiophysics Group University of Twente 2014-08-19

PresentationAugust19th

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: PresentationAugust19th

Plasmonic Enhancement of Single Methylene Blue Molecule Fluorescence Near Individual

Gold Nanorods

Tianchu LiangOptical Science GroupNanoBiophysics GroupUniversity of Twente

2014-08-19

Page 2: PresentationAugust19th

Introduction

Image (left) from Resonant Plasmonic Enhancement of Single-Molecule Fluorescence by Individual Gold Nanorods.Image (right) from Jesse Mak’s Thesis.

• Single Molecule imaging and spectroscopy requires high photon counts by emitters.

Page 3: PresentationAugust19th

Introduction-Emitters• Methylene Blue

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Methylene_blue

Images from Jesse Mak’s Thesis, Fig 2.1.

Page 4: PresentationAugust19th

Introduction-Plasmonic Enhancement

• Excitation Enhancement– Confine the light field to nano structure’s near

surface.– The shape of nano structure is important.

• Emission Enhancement– Altering emitters radiative and nonradiative decay

rates of the emitter molecules.

Page 5: PresentationAugust19th

Excitation Enhancement

Images from Jesse Mak’s Thesis, Fig 3.3, Fig 3.4.

• Optical properties described by a frequency dependent dielectric function.

• Plasmonic resonances in quasi-static structures.• Plasmonic resonances in elongated structures.

Fabry-Perot Resonantor

Page 6: PresentationAugust19th

Emission Enhancement

Intrinsic quantum yield:

New quantum yield:

Page 7: PresentationAugust19th

Emission Enhancement

Images from Jesse Mak’s Thesis, Fig 4.1.

Quantum yield of an emitter near a gold sphere, as a function of their separation dis- tance, for emitters with different intrinsic quantum yields (Φ0q ).

Methylene Blue has 1%-2% quantum yield.

Page 8: PresentationAugust19th

My job over the summer

• Separate emission enhancement from the total enhancement.

• Possible quenching caused by emitters sticking to the nanorods.

Page 9: PresentationAugust19th

Experiment-SetupNanorod sample covered with solution

Objective

640nm Laser

Dichroic Filter

664nm Long pass

APD

Page 10: PresentationAugust19th

Experiment-Nanorod sample

Images from Jesse Mak’s Thesis。

Page 11: PresentationAugust19th

Experiment-MB solution

• 102.8nM of Methylene blue in glycerol.

Page 12: PresentationAugust19th

Pick the right nano rod

Images from Jesse Mak’s Thesis.

Page 13: PresentationAugust19th

Experiment

• Hit the same nano rod with two polarizations, along short axis, and along long axis. – Short axis-> Emission Enhancement.– Long axis-> Emission Enhancement + Excitation

Enhancement.• For a certain polarization, vary the light focus

height: aiming at nano rods, slightly above nano rods, a lot higher than the nano rods.

Page 14: PresentationAugust19th

Results-Emission Enhancement

Page 15: PresentationAugust19th

Results-Total Enhancement

Page 16: PresentationAugust19th

Results-With varying light focus heightEnhancement factors

Distance from the nanorods (nm)

Emission Enhancement

Total Enhancement

Page 17: PresentationAugust19th

Conclusion

• At the maximal enhancement, the total enhancement is about 1.41 times stronger than the emission enhancement.

• As the light focus ascend from nanorods to 600nm above, the total enhancement tends to decrease. But the emission enhancement is maximum at 150nm above the nanorods.

• There might be quenching for emission enhancement when emitters are too close to the nano rods.

Page 18: PresentationAugust19th

Future work

• More data to be taken.• Autocorrelation (FCS) curves may give useful

information.

Page 19: PresentationAugust19th

Acknowledgements

• University of Twente• Optical Science Group, NanoBiophysics Group• Jord Prangsma• Amin Abolghassemi Fakhree• Jennifer Herek