Upload
tianchu-liang
View
15
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Plasmonic Enhancement of Single Methylene Blue Molecule Fluorescence Near Individual
Gold Nanorods
Tianchu LiangOptical Science GroupNanoBiophysics GroupUniversity of Twente
2014-08-19
Introduction
Image (left) from Resonant Plasmonic Enhancement of Single-Molecule Fluorescence by Individual Gold Nanorods.Image (right) from Jesse Mak’s Thesis.
• Single Molecule imaging and spectroscopy requires high photon counts by emitters.
Introduction-Emitters• Methylene Blue
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Methylene_blue
Images from Jesse Mak’s Thesis, Fig 2.1.
Introduction-Plasmonic Enhancement
• Excitation Enhancement– Confine the light field to nano structure’s near
surface.– The shape of nano structure is important.
• Emission Enhancement– Altering emitters radiative and nonradiative decay
rates of the emitter molecules.
Excitation Enhancement
Images from Jesse Mak’s Thesis, Fig 3.3, Fig 3.4.
• Optical properties described by a frequency dependent dielectric function.
• Plasmonic resonances in quasi-static structures.• Plasmonic resonances in elongated structures.
Fabry-Perot Resonantor
Emission Enhancement
Intrinsic quantum yield:
New quantum yield:
Emission Enhancement
Images from Jesse Mak’s Thesis, Fig 4.1.
Quantum yield of an emitter near a gold sphere, as a function of their separation dis- tance, for emitters with different intrinsic quantum yields (Φ0q ).
Methylene Blue has 1%-2% quantum yield.
My job over the summer
• Separate emission enhancement from the total enhancement.
• Possible quenching caused by emitters sticking to the nanorods.
Experiment-SetupNanorod sample covered with solution
Objective
640nm Laser
Dichroic Filter
664nm Long pass
APD
Experiment-Nanorod sample
Images from Jesse Mak’s Thesis。
Experiment-MB solution
• 102.8nM of Methylene blue in glycerol.
Pick the right nano rod
Images from Jesse Mak’s Thesis.
Experiment
• Hit the same nano rod with two polarizations, along short axis, and along long axis. – Short axis-> Emission Enhancement.– Long axis-> Emission Enhancement + Excitation
Enhancement.• For a certain polarization, vary the light focus
height: aiming at nano rods, slightly above nano rods, a lot higher than the nano rods.
Results-Emission Enhancement
Results-Total Enhancement
Results-With varying light focus heightEnhancement factors
Distance from the nanorods (nm)
Emission Enhancement
Total Enhancement
Conclusion
• At the maximal enhancement, the total enhancement is about 1.41 times stronger than the emission enhancement.
• As the light focus ascend from nanorods to 600nm above, the total enhancement tends to decrease. But the emission enhancement is maximum at 150nm above the nanorods.
• There might be quenching for emission enhancement when emitters are too close to the nano rods.
Future work
• More data to be taken.• Autocorrelation (FCS) curves may give useful
information.
Acknowledgements
• University of Twente• Optical Science Group, NanoBiophysics Group• Jord Prangsma• Amin Abolghassemi Fakhree• Jennifer Herek