27
Presentation to Presentation to The Joint Subcommittee to Study the The Joint Subcommittee to Study the Commonwealth's Program Commonwealth's Program for Prisoner Reentry to Society for Prisoner Reentry to Society September 26, 2007 Richmond, Virigina Michael D. Thompson Director Justice Center Council of State Governments

Presentation to The Joint Subcommittee to Study the

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Presentation to The Joint Subcommittee to Study the

Presentation toPresentation toThe Joint Subcommittee to Study theThe Joint Subcommittee to Study the

Commonwealth's Program Commonwealth's Program for Prisoner Reentry to Societyfor Prisoner Reentry to Society

September 26, 2007

Richmond, Virigina

Michael D. Thompson

Director

Justice Center

Council of State Governments

Page 2: Presentation to The Joint Subcommittee to Study the

• Non-profit, non-partisan membership association of state government officials

• Represents all three branches of state government

• Provides practical, nonpartisan advice informed by the best available evidence

• Support from the U.S. Department of Justice and private grantmakers such as The Pew Charitable Trusts

Page 3: Presentation to The Joint Subcommittee to Study the

• Building blocks of a statewide reentry plan

• Justice Reinvestment: a strategy to increase public safety and save money

• Getting Started

Page 4: Presentation to The Joint Subcommittee to Study the

National Projects

Page 5: Presentation to The Joint Subcommittee to Study the

RE-ENTRY POLICY COUNCIL

Develop Policies and Programs:

Make smart release and community supervision decisionsEnsure support for victimsOffer safe places to liveBreak the bonds of addictionTreat physical and mental illnessFoster meaningful relationshipsProvide training, education, and jobs

What Does the RPC Report Recommend?

Page 6: Presentation to The Joint Subcommittee to Study the

RE-ENTRY POLICY COUNCIL

Address Core Challenges:

Redefine missionsMaximize the value of existing fundingIntegrate systemsMeasure performanceInform and reassure the public

What Does the RPC Report Recommend?

Page 7: Presentation to The Joint Subcommittee to Study the

RE-ENTRY POLICY COUNCIL

Immediate dilemmas:

What subset of people released from prison will we focus on?What package of supervision, supports, and services will we provide?How will we manage and oversee the initiative?How will we track performance and measure accountability?How will we pay for it?

What Does the RPC Report Recommend?

Page 8: Presentation to The Joint Subcommittee to Study the

Sources: US Census 2005; BJS “Probation and Parole in US, 2005”; jail figures from BJS “Prison and Jail Inmates at Midyear 2005”; prison figures from BJS, Prisoners in 2005, November 06 report

19.2 million14.6 adults

22.8 million16.4 adults

36.1 million26.4 adults

752,817 2.8% of adults

767,7654.6% of adults

264,8361.8% of adults

State Population Probation, Jail, Prison and Parole Population

17.1 million13.6 adults

436,0063.2% of adults

TX

CA

FL

NY

Incarceration Rates in 4 Large States

Page 9: Presentation to The Joint Subcommittee to Study the

Population

1980: 14,229,1912005: 22,859,968

+61%

Source: Population US Census Historical Report; Crime, FBI Crime in US; Incarceration, BJS, Prisoners in US

1980: 24,037,6262005: 36,132,147

+50%

1980: 17,558,0722005: 19,254,630

+10%

1980: 9,746,3242005: 17,789,864

+82%

Incarceration Rate*

1980: 226 2005: 691

+206%

1980: 162 2005: 466

+188%

1980: 2422005: 499

+106%

1980: 1872005: 326

+74%

Crime Rate*

1980: 6,0302005: 4,862

-19%

1980: 6,4682005: 3,849

-40%

1980: 6,8212005: 4,716

-31%

1980: 5,5772005: 2,554

-54%

Incarceration and Reported Index Crime Rate by FBI per 100,000 population

TX

CA

FL

NY

Changes in Crime Rates

Page 10: Presentation to The Joint Subcommittee to Study the

Justice Reinvestment Strategy

Step 1: Analyze the prison population and spending in the communities to which people in prison often return

Step 2: Provide policymakers with options to generate savings and increase public safety

Step 3: Quantify savings and reinvest in select communities

Step 4: Measure the impact and enhance accountability

Page 11: Presentation to The Joint Subcommittee to Study the

Key Funding Sources

Bureau of Justice Assistance, US Department of Justice

Pew Charitable Trusts

Page 12: Presentation to The Joint Subcommittee to Study the
Page 13: Presentation to The Joint Subcommittee to Study the

7000

7500

8000

8500

9000

9500

10000

10500

11000

11500

Current Capacity (9397)

1834bed shortfall

$500 m10 yr Costs

$180 mConstruction

$320mOperating

26%increase

20%increase

KansasPrison Population Projection

Page 14: Presentation to The Joint Subcommittee to Study the

65 %

35 %

KansasRecidivism a Key Driver

– 65 % of admissions

– 27 % of prison population

– Annual cost of $53 million

5 percent

29 percent

27 percent

Prison AdmissionsFY2006

36 percentProbation Violations

ParoleViolations

Prob./Parole, New Sentence

New Court Commitments

Page 15: Presentation to The Joint Subcommittee to Study the

KansasFocus on Reducing Recidivism Before & After Release

Page 16: Presentation to The Joint Subcommittee to Study the

8000

8500

9000

9500

10000

10500

11000

11500

2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016

Current Capacity: 9,397

Status QuoOption 1Option 2

Option 3

Combined Impact

Kansas: Options for PolicymakersFY2008-2016 (9 years) Projected Prison Population

Page 17: Presentation to The Joint Subcommittee to Study the

KansasEstimated Savings & Reinvestment

• $80 million in projected savings over the next 5 years

• $4.5 million reinvested in community corrections grant program

• $2.4 million reinvested in expanding in-prison and community-based program capacity

Page 18: Presentation to The Joint Subcommittee to Study the

150,834150,834

168,166164,592

162,298159,492

157,029153,849

140,000

145,000

150,000

155,000

160,000

165,000

170,000

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Source: Legislative Budget Board, June 06 and January 07, Adult and Juvenile Correctional Population Projections

Population

Operational Capacity

Bed Shortfall

3,015

17,332

TexasPrison Population Projection

Page 19: Presentation to The Joint Subcommittee to Study the

Expanding Capacity of Treatment & Diversion Programs

Page 20: Presentation to The Joint Subcommittee to Study the

688 probationers in zip 78745 are presently

assigned to 72 different officers

Austin, Travis County

Thinking About High Stake Communities Can Even Encourage a Better Utilization of Present Resources Like Probation Supervision

Page 21: Presentation to The Joint Subcommittee to Study the

688 probationers in zip 78745 could be assigned to 6 officers working in

the neighborhood instead of 72 different

officers from a “central” office

Austin, Travis County

Probation Caseloads Could Be Organized More Effectively Around “High Stakes” Neighborhoods

Page 22: Presentation to The Joint Subcommittee to Study the

153,849155,616

151,817153,849

168,166

164,592

162,298

159,492

157,029

153,849

145,000

147,500

150,000

152,500

155,000

157,500

160,000

162,500

165,000

167,500

170,000

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Source: Legislative Budget Board, January 07 Scenarios Impact Analysis

Parole Scenario $543 million in

probable savings 08-12

Baseline

Probation/Treatment75% Diversions

$65.1 million in probable net savings 08-12

Potential $377 million in avoided prison

construction costs

TexasImpact of Policy Options

Page 23: Presentation to The Joint Subcommittee to Study the

TexasEstimated Savings & Reinvestment

• $451 million in projected savings over the next 2 years

• $241 million to expand in-prison and community-based treatment and diversion programs

Page 24: Presentation to The Joint Subcommittee to Study the

Prison Expenditure: New Haven Neighborhoods

Page 25: Presentation to The Joint Subcommittee to Study the

Probationers

UI Claimants

TFA Recipients

Probationers, Unemployment Insurance Claimants, TFA Recipients: New Haven Neighborhoods

Page 26: Presentation to The Joint Subcommittee to Study the

• Commission a bipartisan analysis of why the prison population is growing

• Identify strategies to avert project growth and increase public safety and improve conditions in high-stakes communities

• Establish a bipartisan, interbranch structure to manage the implementation of these strategies

• Track performance

NEXT STEPS

Page 27: Presentation to The Joint Subcommittee to Study the

www.justicecenter.csg.org

Michael [email protected]