Upload
fg-summer
View
66
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
An unforeseen disaster
The buncefield explosion
Overview
� Introduction
� Chain of events
� Explosion and ignition source
� Organisational factors� Organisational factors
� Conclusion
No smoke without fire
IntroductionIntroduction
Overview
� Hemel Hempstead
� Buncefield oil depot
� The incident
� Responses
Hemel Hempstead
� Oil storage facility
� North of London
� County of
Hertfordshire
� 89,000 people
Hemel Hempstead
� Engineering compagnies
� Nearby London and
motorway
� Hertfordshire Oil Storage � Hertfordshire Oil Storage
Terminal (HOST)
Hemel Hempstead
Buncefield oil depot
� UK oil pipeline network
� Operator is Total for 60%,
Texaco for 40% and Shell
and BP also use their and BP also use their
facilities
Buncefield oil depot
Buncefield oil depot
� 5th largest of UK
� Capacity:
� 273 million litres of fuel
� 400 tanker lorries every day � 400 tanker lorries every day
� 2.37 million tonnes oil every year
� 5% of UK oil storage
� Storage of aviation fuel, diesel
and petrol
The Incident
� Explosion at six o’clock
� Heard 160 km away in the
Netherlands and France
� 2.4 scale of Richter� 2.4 scale of Richter
� Flames seen hundreds of
meters high from many
kilometers away
The Incident
The Incident
� Huge black smoke plume
headed over southeast
London
� Ultimately towards France � Ultimately towards France
and Portugal
� Could be seen on satellite
images
The Incident
The Incident
� Security worker at the depot:
"I sat down and all of a sudden there was
a huge orange light and a massive a huge orange light and a massive
explosion which blew the doors through
and knocked me off my chair, and the
ceiling fell in.”
The Incident
� Widespread damages
in local area:
� Broken windows and
blown-in doorsblown-in doors
� Cars caught fire
� Removed wall 800
meters away
� Roofs blown off
The Incident
The Incident
� 22 tanks were destroyed
� Biggest of its kind since
WWII
Responses
� 150 firefighters with 6
pumps for 25,000 litres of
water per minute
� Fire under control by the � Fire under control by the
evening of wednesday the
14th
Responses
� Heathrow Airport:
� 30% of supplied fuel
� Delay of landings
� Plains had to refuel at � Plains had to refuel at
other airports
� Fuel shortage for
months
Responses
� 2000 people had to find
alternative homes
� 227 schools, libraries
and other public and other public
buildings closed
� M1 motorway closed for
12 hours
Responses
� ‘go in, stay in, tune in’
� Information provided about plume
direction and spread
Responses
� Information collected
about air quality, soil
and grass samples
� Minimal impact of fire � Minimal impact of fire
on population due to
heat and weather
conditions
� Minimal health risks
Events leading to the explosionsEvents leading to the explosions
Chain of events
Overview
� Succession of events
� Layout of the tank
� Spread of vapour
� Bow-Tie Model
Layout of tank 912
� Levels and
temperature
� Independent
ultimate high level ultimate high level
switch
� Override keyswitch
� Floating deck
� Breather holes
� Deflector plate
Bow Tie
Looking at the location of the explosion Looking at the location of the explosion
Explosion and ignition source
Overview
� Facts
� Explosion mechanisms
� Ignition source
� Emergency generator cabin
� Pump house
� Conclusion
Facts
� Leak of unleaded petrol� Flashpoint below 32ºC
� Flammable range; 1.4%-7.6%
� Highest overpressures were
generated in the area of the
Northgate and Fuji car parks
Overpressures
Explosion mechanisms
� Gas cloud is ignited within a
confined volume� Majority of the cloud was not
confined!confined!
� Deflagration� Velocity is subsonic
� Turbulence, acceleration
Explosion mechanisms
� Detonation� Faster than the speed of sound
� Coalescence of a strong shock wave
and a fast-moving chemically reacting and a fast-moving chemically reacting
front
Ignition source
Emergency generator cabin:
� Scenario 1 � 'bang-box' explosion inside the
generator cabin
� Propagate with diminishing speed
across the south of the Northgate car
park
� Accelerate rapidly up the tree line
along Buncefield Lane (deflagration)
� Second explosion in the Pump house
Ignition source
Ignition source
Emergency generator cabin:
� Scenario 2 � 'bang-box' explosion inside the
generator cabingenerator cabin
� Detonation, as a result of pressure
and flame interaction with the
Porsche car
� Deflagration across Buncefield Lane
� Second explosion in the Pump house
Ignition source
Pump house:� Scenario 3
� Activation of the site emergency
system, sparks generated, explosionsystem, sparks generated, explosion
� Flame propagating toward the tree
lines (deflagration)
� Scenario 4
� Explosion in the pump house resulted
in a detonation
Ignition source
Ignition source
� Damage to the trees was
extensive and became worse as
Tree Cherry Trees Lane was
approached (scenario 1, 2)
� Relatively even level of damage
across the full car park area
(scenario 2)
� High level of damage to cars
parked at the south-east corner of
the car park (scenario 3, 2)
Ignition source
� Abrasion on the south side of posts
and trees (all options)
� Expected fuel-rich concentration of � Expected fuel-rich concentration of
the cloud in the vicinity of the pump
house (against scenario 4)
Conclusion
� Uncertainty regarding the
composition of the vapour cloud
� Uncertainty regarding the
explosion severity required to
cause the level of damage cause the level of damage
observed
� The time available, as the possible
scenarios could not be tested
against the considerable amount
of information available
Putting the ‘human’ in human errorPutting the ‘human’ in human error
Organisational factors
Organisational factors
� E-mail to Buncefield Investigations
� “As you may be aware, the criminal investigation is still ongoing and, although a decision to prosecute still ongoing and, although a decision to prosecute rests with HSE and the Environment Agency and not with the Board, we are unable to discuss certain issues in order to prevent prejudice of any potential criminal proceedings. Due to this, we are unable to assist you further with the information you require”
Tom Monger, Information Officer – Buncefield Major Incident Investigation Board
Organisational factors
The aftermathThe aftermath
Consequences
Overview
� Injuries/deaths
� Post traumatic stress
� Structure damages (on site)
� Economical damages (environment)� Economical damages (environment)
� Air quality
� Water quality
� Reputation
� Lawsuit damages
Injuries/deaths
� Although 43 people were
injured in the blasts on
Sunday, the 11th of
december, none were december, none were
fataly wounded.
� there were no fatalities.
Post traumatic stress
� Survey among 5000
residents. 40%
respondence.
� Explosion had high
physical impact;
88% heard the blast
84% considered smoke
close to house.
Post traumatic stress
� Low psychological
distress after explosion.
� Highest in South Dacorum
where fire was most where fire was most
apparent.
� Seeing and smelling the
fire was associated with
higher distress.
Structure damage
� Blast and following fire
destroyed most of the fuel
depot.
� Estimates up to 1 billion � Estimates up to 1 billion
euro in damages.
� BP part survived but is
still not in operation.
Economical damages
� 76% of the surrounding
households had experienced
some damage
� Some 92 firms on the � Some 92 firms on the
Maylands business park,
employing about 9,500
people, were directly
affected by the explosion.
Economical damages
� The incident cost firms more
than £70m, according to a
study by the East of England
Development Agency.
� About 1,422 jobs were
relocated and 79 people lost
their jobs.
Air Quality
� Particulate Measure (PM)
� 10, 5, 1
� 10 is harmful
� 5 and 1 get into system,
potentially very harmful
Air Quality
� NETCEN has estimated that
8000 tonnes of PM10 particles
have been released = 6% of
total annual emitions in UK.total annual emitions in UK.
� Plume was mainly black carbon
soot.
Air Quality
� No significant increase in
ground level polution.
� High buoyancy of the plume
resulted in bulk of emisions resulted in bulk of emisions
being trapped aloft, above cold
layers of air.
� Explosion in summer would
have caused far higher air
polution.
Water quality
� Fires were put out using fire
fighting foam
� Non dissolvable and not � Non dissolvable and not
biodegradable
� Big volumes of water, oil and
foam after fire had been put
out.
Water quality
� 26 million litres of
contaminated water used to
fight the blaze is stored
� During the years some
800,000 litres of stored water
was found to have leaked into
the Colne from the Blackbird
sewage treatment works.
Water quality
� ‘Fire water’ (water, oil, foam)
caused elevated levels of
ground water contaminance
but below concern levels.
� Concentration of PFOS in
drinking water was below 3
micrograms/litre which is
indicated as “unlikely to cause
health problems” by HPA.
Reputation
Chevron Stock price 2003 - 2007
Lawsuit damages
� Some 3,300 claims, worth a
potential £700m, have been
filed by individuals, loss
assessors and companies. assessors and companies.
� Of the claims, there are about
250 from individuals, which
total £20m, and 2,754 out of
the 3,300 claims are for less
than £10,000.
Summing upSumming up
Conclusion
Conclusion
� On December 11th 2005 the
Buncefield depot exploded
� Cause: Tank overflow > vapour
cloud
� Ignition source is still under
investigation
Conclusion
� Due to ongoing criminal
investigation, information
about the organisational
factors can not be made publicfactors can not be made public
� No fatalities
� Mainly structure damage
� Limited damage to
environment