1
0 2 4 6 8 10 -200 -150 -100 -50 0 Current (I) Voltage (V) Not Optimized P3 Process Optimized P3 Process LASER PROCESSING OPTIMIZATION FOR 2DMATERIALS-PEROVSKITE SOLAR MODULES STEFANO RAZZA 1 , ANTONIO AGRESTI 1 , SARA PESCETELLI 1 , ALDO DI CARLO 1,2,3 1 C.H.O.S.E., Electronic Engineering Department, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Via del Politecnico 1, 00133, Rome, Italy. 2 Laboratory of Advanced Solar Energy, National University of Science and Technology ‘MISiS’, Moscow, Russia 3 Istituto di Struttura della Materia, CNR-ISM, via del fosso del cavaliere 100, 00133, Rome, Italy. Perovskite Glass/FTO cTiO 2 mTiO 2 Gold For the optimized P2 process, we set a fluence value lower than the required one for an optimal removal of all the layer stack, by repeating the process more than one time. In this way we achieved a robust and repeatable manufacturing process, independently from layer thickness, and by preventing damages in the underneath FTO layer due to intrinsic fluctuations of the laser power. As clearly visible in the microscope image, two ablation steps guarantee a good material removal. The obtained P2 area showed in the image on the right was obtained for all the produced modules with good repeatability. 3 2 1 The insertion of 2D materials-based interlayers or dopants within the device structure can modify the gold adhesion strength to the underneath layer. An incomplete gold removal (Fig.a) generates electrical bridges between module constituting sub-cells, by eventually reducing the Fill Factor (FF). On the other hand, an excessive stress of the layer during the laser process could induce layer delamination (Fig.b), by eventually reducing the active area. During P3 process the risk to damage FTO is lower than P2 process, so a larger tolerance about laser fluence is allowed and it’s possible to achieve a good result by only one step (Fig.c). a) b) c) Industrial applications for two-dimensional (2D) material-perovskite solar devices require optimized fabrication steps devoted to scale-up efficient lab-scale devices to large area modules. In this work, with the aim to get an efficient series interconnection between module constituting sub-cells, we employed a 10 ps laser (λ=355 nm) for all the ablation processes (namely P1, P2, P3), by carrying out a fully optimized device layout [1,2]. If, on one hand, the quality of P2 process has a strong impact on the module serial resistance, on the other hand a not fully optimized P3 process can lead to low parallel resistance value. In the present work, we show how the module performance can be improved by the optimizing P2 and P3 processes. The parameters used for each laser ablation step were set to obtain an efficient and fast process by retaining high process repeatability. As a matter of fact, laser fluence and process speed need to be optimized taking into account the presence of 2D materials and their depositions techniques, preventing the incomplete removal of the layers or the laser- induced active area degradation. The Graph shows how P3 process impacts on module performance. The red I-V curve is acquired on a module with not optimized P3 process. The incomplete gold removal reduces the module maximum voltage and FF. By performing a second optimized P3 process on the same module, the efficiency was boosted up to 15,3% (blue curve) Using the procedures described in this work we realized more than 400 modules during the last year, changing dimensions, layout and layer composition. We obtained a good uniformity and repeatability on substrate of dimension up to 14X14 cm 2 . Antonio Agresti, Sara Pescetelli, Alessandro Lorenzo Palma, Beatriz Martín- García, Leyla Najafi, Sebastiano Bellani, Iwan Moreels, Mirko Prato, Francesco Bonaccorso, Aldo Di Carlo, ACS Energy Lett. 2019, 4, 8, 1862-1871 Alessandro Lorenzo Palma, Fabio Matteocci, Antonio Agresti, Sara Pescetelli, Emanuele Calabrò, Luigi Vesce,Silke Christiansen, Michael Schmidt, and Aldo Di Carlo,IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics, 6 (2017) 1674-1680 P2 P3 ABSTRACT STEFANO RAZZA [email protected] RESULTS 11.2% 15.3% [1] [2]

Presentación de PowerPointphantomsfoundation.com/ONLINE/GrapheneIF/Posters/...3 2 1 The insertion of 2D materials-based interlayers or dopants within the device structure can modify

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Presentación de PowerPointphantomsfoundation.com/ONLINE/GrapheneIF/Posters/...3 2 1 The insertion of 2D materials-based interlayers or dopants within the device structure can modify

0 2 4 6 8 10

-200

-150

-100

-50

0

Cu

rre

nt

(I)

Voltage (V)

Not Optimized P3 Process

Optimized P3 Process

LASER PROCESSING OPTIMIZATION FOR 2DMATERIALS-PEROVSKITE SOLAR MODULES

STEFANO RAZZA1, ANTONIO AGRESTI1, SARA PESCETELLI1, ALDO DI CARLO1,2,3

1C.H.O.S.E., Electronic Engineering Department, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Via del Politecnico 1, 00133, Rome, Italy.2Laboratory of Advanced Solar Energy, National University of Science and Technology ‘MISiS’, Moscow, Russia

3Istituto di Struttura della Materia, CNR-ISM, via del fosso del cavaliere 100, 00133, Rome, Italy.

Perovskite

Glass/FTO

cTiO2

mTiO2

Gold

For the optimized P2 process, we set a fluence value lower than the required one for an optimal removal of all the layer stack, by repeating the process morethan one time. In this way we achieved a robust and repeatable manufacturing process, independently from layer thickness, and by preventing damagesin the underneath FTO layer due to intrinsic fluctuations of the laser power. As clearly visible in the microscope image, two ablation steps guarantee a goodmaterial removal. The obtained P2 area showed in the image on the right was obtained for all the produced modules with good repeatability.

3 2 1

The insertion of 2D materials-based interlayers or dopants within the device structure can modify the gold adhesion strength to the underneath layer. Anincomplete gold removal (Fig.a) generates electrical bridges between module constituting sub-cells, by eventually reducing the Fill Factor (FF). On theother hand, an excessive stress of the layer during the laser process could induce layer delamination (Fig.b), by eventually reducing the active area. During P3process the risk to damage FTO is lower than P2 process, so a larger tolerance about laser fluence is allowed and it’s possible to achieve a good result byonly one step (Fig.c).

a) b) c)

Industrial applications for two-dimensional (2D) material-perovskite solar devices require optimized fabrication steps devoted to scale-upefficient lab-scale devices to large area modules. In this work, with the aim to get an efficient series interconnection between module constituting sub-cells, we

employed a 10 ps laser (λ=355 nm) for all the ablation processes (namely P1, P2, P3), by carrying out a fully optimized device layout [1,2]. If, on one hand, thequality of P2 process has a strong impact on the module serial resistance, on the other hand a not fully optimized P3 process can lead to low parallel resistancevalue. In the present work, we show how the module performance can be improved by the optimizing P2 and P3 processes. The parameters used for each laserablation step were set to obtain an efficient and fast process by retaining high process repeatability. As a matter of fact, laser fluence and process speed need tobe optimized taking into account the presence of 2D materials and their depositions techniques, preventing the incomplete removal of the layers or the laser-induced active area degradation.

The Graph shows how P3 process impacts on moduleperformance. The red I-V curve is acquired on amodule with not optimized P3 process. Theincomplete gold removal reduces the modulemaximum voltage and FF. By performing a secondoptimized P3 process on the same module, theefficiency was boosted up to 15,3% (blue curve)

Using the procedures described in this work werealized more than 400 modules during the lastyear, changing dimensions, layout and layercomposition. We obtained a good uniformity andrepeatability on substrate of dimension up to14X14 cm2.

Antonio Agresti, Sara Pescetelli, Alessandro Lorenzo Palma, Beatriz Martín-García, Leyla Najafi, Sebastiano Bellani, Iwan Moreels, Mirko Prato, Francesco Bonaccorso, Aldo Di Carlo, ACS Energy Lett. 2019, 4, 8, 1862-1871

Alessandro Lorenzo Palma, Fabio Matteocci, Antonio Agresti, Sara Pescetelli, Emanuele Calabrò, Luigi Vesce,Silke Christiansen, Michael Schmidt, and Aldo Di Carlo,IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics, 6 (2017) 1674-1680

P2

P3

ABSTRACT

STEFANO [email protected]

RESULTS

11.2%

15.3%

[1]

[2]