Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
The Technical Magazineof the Gearing Partners Klingelnberg and Liebherr
No. 20/2011
Presence in Global MarketsProducts – Benefits – Service
2sigma RepoRt 20/2011
sigma RePoRT Nr. 20
Publisher
Sigma Pool
Klingelnberg GmbH Peterstrasse 45 · 42499 Hueckeswagen Germany
Liebherr-Verzahntechnik GmbH Kaufbeurer Strasse 141 · 87437 Kempten Germany
Klingelnberg AG Binzmuehlestrasse 171 · 8050 Zurich Switzerland
editorial Staff
Heinz Hoffmann Phone +49 2192 81-370 [email protected]
editorial Contributions
Dr.-Ing. Klaus Finkenwirth, Dr.-Ing. Hansjörg Geiser, Dr.-Ing. Andreas Mehr, Dipl.-Ing. Georg Mies, James Mitchell, Dr.-Ing. Hartmuth Müller, Dr.-Ing. Alois Mundt, Dr. Jamie Pears, Dipl.-Ing. (FH) Florian Schuon, Dipl.-Ing. Frank Seibicke, Dr.-Ing. Oliver Winkel
editing and Design
C&G: Strategische Kommunikation GmbH, Olper Strasse 10–12 · 51491 Overath Germany www.c-g-gmbh.de
Text: Tobias Hartmann Graphics: Viola Dreyling
Photos
C&G:, Klingelnberg, Liebherr, Winergy, ZF
IMPRINT
0403
2620
06
30
14
36
Partnership for Success
Presence in Global Markets
Complete Machining in a New Dimension
Efficient Software
Good Things Need Some Time
Measurement Technology
Customer Portrait Cutting Beveloid Gears
The New Hardness for Short Grinding Times
3sigma RepoRt 20/2011
Presence in Global MarketsWorldwide Growth and Further Developments in Technology
Dear Readers,
The market is characterized by new challenges every day. This
is true not only for the further development of our technol-
ogies but also for our worldwide customer support. Liebherr
and Klingelnberg have been facing this challenge together for
almost two decades as partners in a joint association called
the Sigma Pool.
Globalization not only means the delivery of goods across
the world, globalization also means that global companies
produce and provide services on-site for local demand – prod-
ucts and services follow the markets. We have been responding
to this necessity for a long time through our own distribution
and sales offices in many countries.
The Sigma Pool has opened a site of its own in Shanghai for
service and spare parts in order to offer our customers rapid
and qualified support in China as well, where a number of
machine tools and measuring machines from Klingelnberg
and/or Liebherr are already in operation. We therefore follow
customer requirements with a view to geographic proxim-
ity and to technological progress. In this way, we successively
enhance the global availability of our services and applica-
tion technology.
In addition to services available all over the world, we focus on
technological innovation in this report: In the area of beveloid
cutting, Liebherr has achieved a technological breakthrough in
the process reliability of this procedure in production through
intensive development work and practical application. Much
the same is true for skiving: Even though the principle has
already been known for more than 100 years, Klingelnberg is
the first to be able to implement it in a cost-effective fashion
with respect to machinery, tools and production processes.
Dr. Alois Mundt, General Manager of Liebherr-Verzahntechnik GmbH
As you can see, the machines themselves are only one of
many factors which account for the achievements of the
Sigma Pool. Our solution package is made up of a combina-
tion of development work, consultation, machinery, software,
training, service and worldwide cooperation.
In order to understand the new challenges in terms of this
holistic approach, our approach is to think outside of exist-
ing models of products and markets. As the Sigma Pool of
today, we remain your partner for solving the problems of the
future. This is what we work on every day - around the clock,
around the globe.
I hope you have an interesting read.
Yours Alois Mundt
4sigma RepoRt 20/2011
Rubrik
Service in China: Partnership for Success
In recent years, Sigma pool partners Klingelnberg and Liebherr have sold machine tools and measuring machines very successfully in China. Due to the wide variety of machines that have been commissioned on the Chinese market, the companies decided to establish their own service location in China.
5sigma RepoRt 20/2011
Service Joint Venture
Service in China: Partnership for Success
In recent years, Klingelnberg has installed a great number of
measuring devices and cutting tools in China. Liebherr has
also sold numerous hobbing, shaping and grinding machines
to Chinese customers. Previously, Klingelnberg and Liebherr
have provided all of their services from Europe. Now the
Sigma Pool has established a joint venture in Shanghai – a
new service location that significantly reduces reaction times.
In order to cope with the growing significance of the Chinese
market and to do justice to the promising projects that will
lead to even more machines delivered to China, quick reac-
tion times for service and good, local spare parts supply are
necessary. In addition to Klingelnberg and Liebherr, DKSH is
the third partner in the joint venture. This company had
already represented the Sigma Pool in China. DKSH has a
comprehensive distribution network, which has contributed
significantly to the opening of the Chinese market for ma-
chines produced by Klingelnberg and Liebherr. In the future,
Information
DKSH is the leading Market Expansion Services provider with
a focus on Asia. The company helps other partner companies
to expand their business in existing or new markets. The DKSH
spectrum of services includes the entire value chain for all
types of products and services: sourcing, research
and analysis, marketing and sales as well
as distribution and after-sales service.
DKSH offers companies professional
expertise, well established local
logistics and solutions customized to
individual situations. A comprehensive,
unique distribution network completes the
spectrum. The business activities are orga-
nized into four highly specialized business
units, which reflect the DKSH fields of expertise in
specific industries: consumer goods, health care and
pharmaceutical products, specialized raw materials
and technology products.
Headquarters in Zurich, Switzerland•
Subsidiaries in 35 countries•
Locations: 590 in the Asia Pacific region •
and 20 in Europe and the Americas
Source/further information: www.dksh.de
China will remain one of the largest growth markets for the
Sigma Pool.
Under its own name, DKSH is currently providing services for
Liebherr and Klingelnberg. With the professional technical
support provided in the context of the new joint venture,
the manufacturing companies Klingelnberg and Liebherr are
moving directly into the customers’ focus. At the same time,
this expresses the tremendous importance of this market for
both companies.
The newly established company will provide the following services:
Installation and approval of new machines • and measuring devices
Inspection and maintenance work•
Calibration of measuring devices, • analysis and remedy of faults
Machine and measuring device repair•
Technical application consultation•
Each of the three partners has a one-third interest in the
service joint venture located in Shanghai. A local spare parts
storage location for all important components ensures the
customers access to quick supply.
In 2010, Klingelnberg and Liebherr already started training
eight Chinese employees with regard to servicing Sigma Pool
machines. Within three years, the joint venture will provide all
major services on site in China - independent of the European
locations. n
Dr.-Ing. Hartmuth Müller
Chief Technical Officer (CTO)Klingelnberg GmbH
Dr.-Ing. Klaus Finkenwirth
Managing DirectorLiebherr-Verzahntechnik GmbH
Good Things Need Some Time
6sigma RepoRt 20/2011
It began more than 100 years ago: the story of skiving. on March 1st, 1910, Wilhelm von pittler registered a patent which was to revolutionize the manufacture of internal gears.
7sigma RepoRt 20/2011
Skiving
the hob. The advantage of this procedure lays in its enormous
productivity. Even though the manufacture of such tools was
not simple, the short processing times and the high quality
of the gears manufactured in this fashion were convincing
enough to ensure that hobbing became the established stan-
dard toothing procedure for cylindrical gears.
Unfortunately, hobbing can only be applied to external cylin-
drical gears. In order to produce rings with internal gear-
ing, even today one is still forced to rely on broaching, form
cutting or shaping. It is precisely at this point that skiving
opens up new opportunities. An internal gear with cutting on
the abutting face is used as the tool. In contrast with shap-
ing, however, the cutting movement is not generated by an
oscillating stroke movement. It is far more the case that the
intersecting axis alignment of the tool and workpiece creates
an axial relative speed which makes the cutting movement
possible. During the rotation of the tool, each cutting edge
cuts through different tooth depths on the workpiece – a
movement which is required for the cutting process. The
intersection of the axes accounts for the fact that the helix
angle of the tool and the helix angle of the internal gear
to be manufactured differ by the amount of the axis inter-
section angle (see Fig. 1 sketch). Von Pittler thus developed
a continuously revolving toothing process which can drasti-
cally increase productivity for internal gearing. As a basic rule,
skiving makes it possible to generate any kind of periodic
structures on axially symmetrical lateral areas. ➔
Fig. 1.: Patent application of Wilhelm von Pittler and sketch, 1910
His patent for skiving with the title “Procedure for the cut-
ting of internal gears by means of a internal gear-like cutting
tool on which the faces of the teeth are provided with cutting
edges” was initially reminiscent of the method for shaping
internal gears that was already known at the time. The truly
revolutionary aspect of this idea required a second look.
Differentiation from shaping and hobbing
With shaping, the cutting movement is generated by means
of the stroke of the shaper cutter in an axial direction, which
rotates the workpiece and the tool somewhat further in accor-
dance with the number of their teeth during the oscillating
stroke movements. The tool is pulled back from the workpiece
in a radial direction to an extent sufficient to ensure a colli-
sion-free return stroke. All in all, this results in an interrupted
cutting movement of the shaper cutter. Because of the return
stroke, during which no cutting takes place, this shaping of
cylindrical gears always involves a time loss.
Approximately 50 years prior to the invention of skiving,
Christian Schiele obtained a patent for a screw-shaped hob
for the manufacture of cylindrical gears, the predecessor of
8sigma RepoRt 20/2011
Skiving
Fig. 2 shows the degrees of freedom of the
kinematics of skiving. In addition to this gra-
dient for the axis intersection angle, there is
also a tilting angle, the gradient of which pro-
ceeds perpendicular to the axis of rotation of
the tool and perpendicular to the gradient for
the axis intersection angle. With this tilting,
a relief angle is achieved between the tooth
flanks of the tool and the tooth flanks of the
workpiece, which can also be referred to as
the kinematic relief angle. In addition, two
linear offsets are required. On the one hand,
the distance between the workpiece axis and
the tool axis must be adjusted, and on the
other hand, the tool must be traversed along
the workpiece axis. This traversing of the tool
along the workpiece axis requires a rotation
which overlaps the tool rotation or the work-
piece rotation which is dependent on the axis
intersection angle. It is usually referred to as
differential speed.
Classic tools for skiving
In accordance with the idea contained in
Pittler’s patent, shaping cutters have been
used for skiving in the past. This becomes
particularly evident when the tool is a
straight-toothed cylindrical cutting wheel.
The axis intersection angle must then cor-
respond precisely to the helix angle of the
internal gear to be manufactured. Such
tools can therefore only be utilized if the
helix angle of the internal gear to be manu-
factured is sufficiently large. The cutting
profile must be adjusted in accordance with
the helix angle. Because of the cylindrical
contour of the cutting wheel, it is manda-
tory to set a suitable tilting angle in order
for a usable relief angle to result from the
process. This tilting angle requires a renewed
adjustment in the tooth profile of the cutting
wheel (for an example of such tools, see
Fig. 3 above). The immediately recogniz-
able advantage of such tools is the simple
resharpening. It is sufficient to resharpen
after the stripping of the rake face and to
apply a new coating to the tool. The geome-
try does not change, which means that after
each resharpening with the original kine-
matics, the same tooth form is generated.
The longer the cutting wheel is, the more
often resharpening can be applied to it
and the lower the associated tool costs
becomes.
The decisive disadvantage to such tools
lies with the relief angle, which is always
way too small. The smaller the relief
angle, the higher the thermal load on
the cutting edge and the shorter the tool
life of the tool. The wearing characteris-
tics with cylindrical cutting wheels are
always exposed surface wear and cracks.
The problem of a relief angle which is too
small can be avoided through the utiliza-
tion of conical tools.
Furthermore, Fig. 3 shows a conical cut-
ting wheel. The relief angle is integrated
here in the tool. If the helix angle and the
axis intersection angle are different, then
one will obtain extremely different rake angles for the leading and trailing
flank of the cutters. In such cases, a step cut must be carried out on the rake
Fig. 3: Classic tools for skiving: cylindrical (above) and conical(Source: Bechle, A.: Beitrag zur prozessicheren Bearbeitung beim Hochleistungsfertigungsverfahren Wälzschälen, Dissertation WBK, University Karlsruhe, 2006)
Axis intersection angle
Common perpendicular
Sax
SD
Wz Wo
Rake face offset
Contact point
Tilt angle
Tool rotationWorkpiece rotation
Differential feed
Axial feed of tool parallel to workpiece axis
Fig. 2: Kinematics of the skiving process: The intersecting axis arrangement is achieved by a tilting around the distance of closest approach and base points of the perpendicular of the axes of tool and workpiece.
9sigma RepoRt 20/2011
Skiving
faces. It is only that a similar rake angle can be
achieved for the leading and tailing flanks of
the cutters. This makes resharpening a difficult
process. In addition to that, a somewhat dif-
ferent profile is obtained after each time the
tool is resharpened. In order to produce the
same exact tooth space, adjustments to the
kinematics are necessary. Experience has
shown that conical tools can be resharpened
only a very few times.
Here the first dilemma becomes evident:
A cylindrical tool requires little effort for
resharpening, but always exhibits an inferior
behavior with respect to wearing. A conical
tool has a significantly better wearing behav-
ior, but it can be resharpened only a very few
times and this resharpening is a very diffi-
cult process.
Why has skiving been unsuccessful to date?
The productivity of a machining process
depends essentially on thickness and on
the number of cuts per time unit. The
great potential of skiving is evident in the
number of cuts per time unit. The required
cutting speed can be achieved by means of
suitable tool and workpiece rotation speeds
and through the suitable choice of the axis
intersection angle. For a dry cutting proce-
dure with a carbide tool, cutting speeds of
150 to 250 meters per minute are beneficial.
Simple approximate calculations make this
difference clear: With an assumed rotation
speed of 2,000 rotations per minute, which
leads to 200 meters per minute of cutting
speed, and with a tool with 25 teeth, 50,000
cuts are obtained per minute. A hob with
8 studs and two gears, which requires only
1,200 rotations per minute of tool rotations
for the same cutting speed, provides by con-
trast only 19,200 cuts per minute.
Naturally the question comes up of why, given
this potential, skiving has had a completely
unsuccessful existence to the present day. It
is certainly not for lack of scientific interest.
For more than 20 years, many investigations
have been carried out in this area, all of which are in agreement on one point:
skiving is a high-performance procedure, the success of which cannot take
hold because of the limited tool lives, excessive machinery vibrations and
critical chip removal.
The previously mentioned parameters of chip thickness and cuts per time unit
do indeed define the essence of productivity, but it is the cost-effectiveness of a
procedure which is of decisive importance for success in everyday practice. Short
processing times alone are not sufficient if the tool life is unsatisfactory.
In order to understand why the tools fail so rapidly, one must analyze the chip
formation in detail. Even though the kinematics of skiving can be described
in very simple terms, the relation between the cutting edge and workpiece
is a complicated movement for which suitable simulation tools are required
Fig. 4: Track of a cutter in relation to the workpiece from above (left) and viewed from the inner radius (below)
(Fig. 4). In this example, the workpiece has 48 teeth and the tool 17. After
every 17 teeth, this cutter machines the next tooth space of the workpiece.
Because the number of teeth is relatively prime, all of the tooth spaces of
the workpiece will actually be machined. If one numbers the tooth spaces
sequentially and counts them in counterclockwise order starting with the
tooth space at 9 o’clock, then the cutter depicted will machine the tooth
spaces in the sequence 1-18-35-4-21-38-7 etc., or to formulate this precisely
ix17mod48+1. ➔
10sigma RepoRt 20/2011
Skiving
In the right-hand side of the image, one sees the movement
of the cutter within a tooth space. The cutter plunges into
the tooth space from the upper right. The radial movement
advances as far as the bottom of the tooth space and then
back again out of the tooth space. During the radial plung-
ing and emergence, the cutter moves axially along the face-
width of the workpiece. The curved course of the track is
significant. From it one can recognize that the tip rake angle
is continuously changing during the cutting in a tooth space
and can even take on a negative value at the end.
Starting results are obtained when simulation tools are used
for precise analysis of the dimensions relevant to the rake
and relief angles for chip formation. The rake angle is zero
degrees at best (0°) and during the process it can take on
negative values down to minus fifty degrees (-50°). It is easy
to appreciate that even the most suitable cutting material
is subjected to stresses in excess of its limits. This is intensi-
fied even more by the fact that negative rake angles always
lead to an increase in cutting forces and result in considerable
challenges to machine tools with respect to profile accuracy,
dynamics and stiffness.
It is because of this combination of tool problems, unfavor-
able chip formation and extremely high demands on the
machine tool that skiving, despite its benefits, has still not
become accepted.
Machine and tool – The success factors for skiving
Modern machine concepts, which are optimized with respect
to chip flow, stiffness, attenuation and geometric accuracy,
have made tremendous advances recently. An example is
the Oerlikon Spiral Bevel Gear Cut-
ting Machine C 29. This was originally
developed for the high-performance
dry cutting of bevel gears. In addition,
it offers ideal characteristics for skiving.
The outstanding stiffness, the highly
dynamic direct drives and the chip
flow which is optimized by the verti-
cal concept, along with precision axis
alignment, are necessary prerequisites
for the success of skiving.
In addition to the machine tool, the
tool itself is the decisive success factor.
As was shown above, chip forma-
tion is quite complicated with skiving
and always associated with disad-
vantageous conditions for the classi-
cal tools, no matter whether they be
cylindrical or conical in design. Usable
relief angles lead to conical tools
which cannot be implemented in a
cost-effective manner. Cylindrical tools
which can be resharpened in a way
which is acceptable from the point of
view of cost-effectiveness, do not offer
Fig. 5: Skiving on an Oerlikon Spiral Bevel Gear Cutting Machine C 29 – the machine axes are shown in red.
11sigma RepoRt 20/2011
Skiving
The advantages of this tool are immediately evident:
Rake and • relief angles can be freely selected and can be optimized for chip
flow
Resharpening • is a reliable process which has been mastered worldwide for more than ten years for bevel gear
tools
Profile modifications can • be implemented immediately by grinding the bar blades
sufficient tool life. Under ideal circumstances the tool design
would only take the cutting edge into account. Any com-
promises with regard to the cutting wheel would become
obsolete.
This tool technology is already available and has been tested
worldwide for a very different application. The Oerlikon stick
blade system with the ARCON® and SPIRON® cutter heads
offer precisely these possibilities for spiral bevel gears. A rect-
angular carbide bar is ground to produce a cutting pro-file
and then coated and inserted in the core of the cutter head,
where it is built with high precision.
The solution is thus, in simple terms, to apply this stick blade
system to skiving. Instead of a cylindrical or conical completely
carbide cutting wheel, now only the cutting geometry is ground
into a carbide bar blade. These profiled bar blades are fastened
in a suitable cutter head core in order to form the cutters of a
stick blade cutting wheel (Fig. 6).
A tool system is thus created which for the first time per-
mits the optimization of the blades for skiving. Together with
the proven Oerlikon bevel gear cutting machines, a manufac-
turing system is available with which skiving can now finally
make a successful appearance on the market, 100 years after
its invention.
Closed loop production
Reliable processes require far more than reliable machines and
suitable tools. It is only the integration of all steps along the
process chain into a continuous data technology composite
which can guarantee stable and reliable results. This method
of approach is familiar to Klingelnberg. The closed loop has
been a proven standard worldwide for bevel gears for many
years. In order to ensure that the user profits from the same
process reliability with skiving that he has with bevel tooth cut-
ting, Klingelnberg has developed the closed loop for cylindri-
cal gear machining by means of skiving. ➔
Fig. 6: Stick blade cutting wheel
12sigma RepoRt 20/2011
Skiving
The structure of closed loop production can be seen in Fig.
7. Everything begins with the design of the gearing. Here the
macrogeometry of the component is defined and the tooth
profile is modified in accordance with various optimization
criteria. In contrast to the approach with bevel gears, here
only one single internal gear, is observed. It is usual with
involute cylindrical gears to observe the topography devia-
tion between the optimized and the non-optimized tooth
flank instead of the ease-off. As soon as the complete
gearing geometry is calculated, the theoretical nominal data
of the tooth form is generated and the calculation of the tool
and of the kinematics begins.
Kinematics and the tool exhibit an influence on one another
in this iterative process. The user is shown the important
parameters for chip formation as the basis for the manufac-
turing simulation of the skiving process. He has the oppor-
tunity of optimizing the tip rake angle, the flank angle and
the relief angle at the head and flanks. As a by-product, he
obtains the appropriate kinematics for the machining equip-
ment and the form of the cutting edge. This software pack-
age supports not only stick blade cutting wheels but also just
as much the classical cylindrical or conical cutting wheels
with and without rake face offset. The gearing design is com-
pleted after these steps and the data for the component to be
produced, the data for the tool and the data for the machine
tool are all completed.
The next step in the process chain is the tool production. For
stick blade cutting wheels, it is here that the tool closed loop
comes into play, as has been known for many years for bevel
gear tools. The description of the tool contains not only the
number of teeth and the form of the cutting edge, but also
all of the geometric parameters of the tool. These include
all rake angle and relief angle information as well as all data
regarding the position of the stick blade in the cutting wheel.
Corrections
Corrections
Skiving
Finished gearing Match to the design
Gearing measurement
Stick blade cutting wheel adjustment
Exact tool
Toothed gear designTool authorization nominal data
Blade grinding
Stick blade measurement
Closed loop for skiving
13sigma RepoRt 20/2011
Skiving
Once a stick blade has been ground, it can be dimensioned
geometrically. Even the smallest deviation of the stick blade
profile from the nominal form is recorded and processed in a
correction algorithm. The results are modifications to the set-
ting values of the grinding machine, so that the measured
deviations are minimized. There are now stick blades com-
pleted which exactly possess the specified profile. These are
positioned in the cutter head with micrometer exactitude
by the Oerlikon CS 200 cutter head adjustment device and
screwed in place. Starting here, it is ensured for the remain-
der of the process that a tool will be used which corresponds
precisely to required specifications.
The truly distinctive features of skiving a gear on an Oerlikon
cutting machine of the C series are the very short processing
times and the manufactured qualities. Once a part has been
milled, its dimensions are recorded in order to determine their
deviations from the theoretical form. Klingelnberg follows a
new path for the measurement of these parts. Instead of the
usual measurement of profile and lead trace as deviations
from an involute tooth form, measurement is carried out here
with a topographic grid. If the deviation at all grid points is
practically zero, then the manufactured component will cor-
respond to the specifications resulting from the tooth design.
Deviations will once again be fed into a correction algorithm
which calculates the correction values for the cutting machine
motions. As is the case with the machine tool, these are fed
per network to the machine control unit which then auto-
matically grinds the next part in such a way that the devia-
tions become minimal.
All closed loop users worldwide now agree that the main
advantage of closed loop production are the reliable processes.
In addition to process-capable machines and tools, it requires
control loops which keep the process stable. It is only when
one produces precisely what was designed that gearing opti-
mizations can occur.
So why skiving?
Internal gears which previously could only be manufactured
through the use of shaping can now be manufactured very
productively and with high precision when skiving is applied.
Even though the kinematics of the skiving process appears
simple at first glance, the chip formation is actually very
complex. Rake angles and relief angles which are subject to
continuous changes during the intervention lead to unfavor-
able chipping conditions with classical cutting wheels – no
matter whether they are conical or cylindrical in shape. This is
precisely the reason for the previous lack of success of skiving
during the last 100 years.
The decisive success factor for skiving is the stick blade tool-
ing system with its open design of relief angles and rake
angles. These kinds of tools have been successfully utilized
around the world for the dry cutting of spiral bevel gears for
more than a decade.
Thanks to the very short machining times and the high com-
ponent quality, it has become possible to reduce manufac-
turing costs drastically – while as a “by-product” the energy
consumption per component is falling and the stick blade
tool system is ensuring exceptionally short run-through times.
All prerequisites, both for large lots and for individual piece
manufacture, are thus fulfilled.
The system process reliability of the procedure is based on
the closed loop for the production. In terms of data, the tool
preparation and the skiving process are in a continuous data
network with the internal gear design. Thanks to the under-
lying quality control loops, it is ensured that that which is pro-
duced is also exactly what was designed.
The actual principle has not changed since the registration
of the Von Pittler patent. However, technical progress with
respect to machinery, tools and production processes in
general has ensured that it turned out well after all. n
Dipl.-Ing. Frank Seibicke
Chief Engineer Calculation SoftwareKlingelnberg GmbH
Dr.-Ing. Hartmuth Müller
Chief Technical Officer (CTO)Klingelnberg GmbH
14sigma RepoRt 20/2011
Cutting Beveloid Gears – Complex Processes Made Easy
Dry cutting, beveloid gears, ChamferCut – to begin with, the unusual combination of requirements was new territory for all involved. But today, ZF in Saarbrucken and Liebherr can already look back on five years of successful colla- boration. From the initial enquiry to the complete setup of the complex machining application, the project progressed remarkably smoothly.
15sigma RepoRt 20/2011
Cutting Beveloid Gears
16sigma RepoRt 20/2011
implemented another technology change to Liebherr dry cut-
ting. No single machine or feature decided it. The overall con-
cept had to be right – and it was ideal.”
Cutting and deburring in a single step
“When we started looking for the right tool system to pro-
duce beveloid gears, we realized there was an important
factor to consider on which Liebherr was able to deliver. We
needed reliable, reproducible and economical deburring of
the gears”, explains Maurer. Previously the deburring process
was very time-consuming, particularly around the root.
“We knew that ChamferCut was a suitable system that could
help us progress”, Maurer says. The fact that cutting and de-
burring are performed in a single process increased overall
production efficiency. But the crucial point, says Maurer, was
finding the right machine technology and software.
In short, 2006 found ZF on the search for a dependable ma-
chine and software solution for the ChamferCut tool system.
Liebherr had not only the right technology, but also the know-
how to rise to the challenge. There followed a series of ex-
periments, joint development work and the in-depth discus-
sion of possible solutions, all of which resulted in a positive
outcome in several areas: “Today, there are three main pillars
to the partnership: ChamferCut, dry cutting on the Liebherr
Reinhold Driess
Cutting Beveloid Gears
“Once our development department had completed the
necessary tests and approvals, the new Liebherr cutting tech-
nology was integrated into our production process in the space
of a few weeks. Then of course there was an internal phase
of optimization and fine-tuning”, says Department Head Gear
Production Hans-Joachim Maurer, recalling the start of the
collaboration between ZF and Liebherr. But how did the part-
nership first start, and what challenges did the two partners
encounter along the way?
Beveloid gears: the beginning
In 2005 the EU introduced a new directive on pedestrian
safety, which required a number of design modifications to
vehicles, including adaptations to the engine compartment.
To enlarge the crumple zone, the vertical gap between the
hood and engine block had to be extended. This produces
an offset, which can however be bridged with the help of a
beveloid or tapered cylindrical gear – which is associated with
particular design challenges of its own. In 2006, ZF became
the first manufacturer to use this solution for all-wheel drive
technology, in its 6HP six-stage automatic transmission.
Jürgen Roos, Department Head Advance Production, explains:
“For the beveloid concept, we basically modified two things.
Firstly, we converted the deburring process to ChamferCut
(from LMT Fette). Secondly, on this larger module scale we
Stefan BauerHans-Joachim Maurer
Jürgen Roos
We were speaking to (illustrations on page 16ff.): Stefan Bauer, CNC Programming/Tool Planning and Standardization, Car Driveline Technology DepartmentReinhold Driess, Department Head Process Planning Gear/Planet Carrier/Advance Production Automatic TransmissionsHans-Joachim Maurer, Department Head Gear Production/Automatic Transmissions Jürgen Roos, Department Head Advance Production and Machine Standards Automatic Transmissions All at ZF in SaarbruckenDr. Oliver Winkel, Head of Application Technology/Technology Development Gear Cutting, Liebherr-Verzahntechnik GmbH
17sigma RepoRt 20/2011
LC series hobbing machines, and beveloid cutting. This com-
bination represented new terrain for all involved. What‘s
more, it meant changing our standard supplier”, says Rein-
hold Driess, Department
Head Process Planning at
ZF. The company required
not only the right equip-
ment, but a high standard
of technology know-how
and tool expertise.
Gears deburred with Cham-
ferCut exhibit a clean, de-
fined chamfer right down
to the root. This was a key
requirement, and one that
was not satisfied by the
previous ECM technology.
Unlike with ECM deburring,
there is no thermal stress and no deformation of the tooth
edges, which makes the process suitable for sensitive follow-on
processes such as honing. Stefan Bauer, from the ZF tool plan-
ning team, describes the complexity of the new tool system:
“Using ChamferCut is a complex task in itself. Applying it to
beveloid gears is even more so.”
Cutting Beveloid Gears
Dr. Oliver Winkel
Optimizing the entire production process
Dry cutting: challenges and benefits
Setting up a new dry cutting system at a customer plant
was not a new challenge for Liebherr, but this project had
a unique feature in the special tooth design, which initially
presented a significant problem. The original tool design had
to be modified for dry cutting and put through its paces on
the test rig. “It was important that we could rely on the new
supplier”, says Maurer. “We chose to rely on the expertise of
Liebherr, and soon realized we had made the right decision
when the redesigned tools and solution were delivered in just
a few weeks.”
Bauer adds: “We had already used dry cutting for smaller
modules, so we knew a lot about the process. Thanks to
Liebherr, we learned even more.” ➔
Hobbing machineWet machining
Washing
Bottleneck, part jamECM deburring Washing
Electrolyte removal
Preservation
Washing for hardening
Hard end machining
Hardening
» Long throughput times and high volume of material in circulation
After integration of deburring in milling process and introduction of dry machiningLiebherrLC120
Hobbing (dry) with ChamferCut deburring
Hard end machining
Hardening
» Minimum throughput times and material in circulation
18sigma RepoRt 20/2011
The adjustment of the workpiece clamping to allow access
to the tools also underlines the coherent concept of the sys-
tem – without impairing quality or machining efficiency. The
successful deployment of the technology is due not only to
the manufacturer‘s technology expertise and on-site support,
but its user-friendliness, which Bauer sums up as follows: “Our
staff likes working on Liebherr machines.”
“Significant improvements”
The ChamferCut technology has the apparant disadvantage
that it adds to the main processing time, but ZF compensated
for this by integrating it optimally into the overall process.
The introduction of dry cutting and deburring in a single pro-
cess has optimized the production process as a whole. Pre-
viously, parts had to be removed from the process, washed,
fed in again and then deburred, before being washed again
and preserved prior to hardening. “In this way we achieved
significant improvements in terms of logistics and through-put
times”, says Bauer (see illustration on page 17). Consequently,
ChamferCut was applied to other parts too.
With such finely optimized processes and very short lead
times in production, system availability is of the essence.
„We require 98 percent availability. Since the Liebherr LC 120
actually exceeds this, delivering 99 percent availability, we
eventually did away with our internal evaluation of
machine availability“, says Roos – testament to the
reliability of the machine and the stability of the
process.
Cutting Beveloid Gears
Dr.-Ing. Oliver Winkel
Head of Application Technology Technology Development Gear CuttingLiebherr-Verzahntechnik GmbH
Promises kept
Driess concludes: “We always have to consider the system
as a whole, and in this respect Liebherr delivered on all its
promises from the development phase – in terms of the
technology, the economy of the machine and tool, and tech-
nical availability. That applies not only to the commissioning of
the system, but beyond.” Or in Maurer‘s words: “Both com-
panies view the collaboration as a partnership combining their
respective strengths. That includes maintaining an open dialog
on joint development projects, and delivering on promises.
In life, you often ask yourself `With the benefit of hind-
sight, would I make the same choice again?´ For this
partnership, the answer is unequivocally yes.” n
Dr. Oliver Winkel, Stefan Bauer and Hans-Joachim Maurer inspect the ChamferCut tool system in front of a Liebherr LC 120.
Cross-section of the 8HP eight-stage automatic transmission – the beveloid gears produced on the Liebherr LC 120 machines are used in the all-wheel drive design. (Source: ZF)
19sigma RepoRt 20/2011
Cutting Beveloid Gears
ZF Friedrichshafen AG(Saarbrucken plant)
The ZF Group is one of the world‘s leading suppliers of
driveline and chassis technology to the automotive indus-
try. The company develops and manufactures innovative,
high-quality products to improve the mobility of people
and goods and all associated technologies.
The Saarbrucken plant, where this project took shape,
belongs to the Car Driveline Technology division. Here are
some facts and figures about this division:
Sales: • € 2.3 billion (16 percent of group sales)
Founded: 1970•
Sites: • Saarbrucken, Brandenburg, Shanghai
Approx. 7,200 employees; • over 5,000 at Saarbrucken
5,000 transmissions manufactured per day•
Investments in R&D: € 646 million in 2010, laying the
foundations for the company‘s innovative force, driven by
the dynamism of the automotive industry; the continuous
development of the product portfolio; and the further
expansion of machine and employee capacities at all sites.
Products of the Driveline Technology division:
Manual transmissions•
Automatic transmissions•
Dual-clutch transmissions•
Hybrid systems•
Clutch systems•
Torque converters•
Dual mass flywheels•
Axle transmissions•
Bevel gear sets•
Differential gears•
ZF driveline and chassis technology helps to make driv-
ing more agile, safe and efficient. To take just one figure
as an example, each new generation of automatic trans-
missions reduces fuel consumption by up to 6 percent.
The company was the first to start volume production of
beveloid gears.
Each ChamferCut deburrs around 800,000 gears per year
(approximately 400,000 beveloid and 400,000 helical) –
that‘s around 3 to 3.5 million gears since it was first
introduced.
For more information, please visit: www.zf.com
The ZF plant at Saarbrucken produces around 5,000 transmissions every day.
Beveloid – dry-cut and chamfered
So many publications have been issued worldwide on the optimization of gear transmissions, one inevitably asks: “Is there any room left for more?”
Efficient Software for Realistic Simulation
20sigma RepoRt 20/2011
942_sigmaREPORT_2011_20-25_GB.indd 20 01.09.2011 12:00:37 Uhr
21sigma RepoRt 20/2011
New Software Solution
Efficient Software for Realistic Simulation
Klingelnberg has extensively investigated the subject of tooth
flank modifications for bevel gears and implemented trend-set-
ting developments. All possibilities for this kind of optimization
have been integrated not only in the motions of the gearing
machines but also in the KIMoS software in a manner suitable
for daily use. Actually, it would be possible to sit back, relax
and announce that everything has already been done to exploit
the entire potential available for gearing design.
Alternative production methods for the manufacture of bevel
gears have been presented recently which use 4-axis or 5-axis
free-form cutting for the machining of tooth flanks. The use
of this method permits the creation of unprecedented tooth
forms, because tool movements associated with the free-
form cutting of a bevel gear need not be oriented to the
kinematics of a bevel gear cutting machine. The opportuni-
ties of these occasionally outlandish tooth forms have been
presented with great pomp at conferences and in special-
ist publications – although no practical results have been
presented to date.
The more closely one studies what actually goes on in the
operation of a set of bevel gears – no matter which tooth
shape is involved – in the overall transmission system, the
more clearly it becomes evident that flank modifications can-
not be usefully applied unless the entire transmission system
has been subjected to sufficient analysis.
If one cannot describe this entire system with sufficient pre-
cision, then the inner workings of the transmission remains
unknown. All discussions about alternative tooth forms or
tooth flank modifications are for that reason obsolete: The
prerequisites required for the optimization are not in place.
Criteria for gear calculation
The key to the gear design lies in the tooth contact. In order
to ensure that a set of bevel gears can continue to work ef-
ficiently for many years, it must be ensured that the stresses
which occur at the tooth contact do not exceed the permit-
ted limit values for the material used. In addition to lubri-
cation conditions, the pressure, the tooth root tension and
the tensile and shearing stresses generated by sliding are the
most important parameters of a tooth contact.
The input variables of the operational conditions are load, ro-
tation speed, and the material and lubricant specifications.
Safety factors representing the relationship between opera-
tional conditions imposed on a gearset and the gearset limits
are output as the result. It is thus that one obtains very quick-
ly an approximate statement regarding the load-bearing ca-
pacity of a gearing under given load conditions. Fig. 1 shows
in graph form the typical resistances of various materials.
The calculation procedures based on the
standards proceed from several simplify-
ing assumptions. Thus, for example, it is
assumed – and quite reliably so – that
the load contact characteristic exhibits a
constant pressure distribution and that
normally 80 percent of the face width
is covered, along with the entire active
tooth depth.
These kinds of simplified assumptions,
however, do not take into account the
complex interactions between the load,
deformation and stress exhibited on
the curved tooth flanks found on bevel
gears. In order to take these kinds of
interactions correctly into account, the
mesh must be analyzed, along with its
actual geometry, as a surface contact
condition.
Surface contact conditions can be solved
with FE methods. Fig. 2 shows a tooth
contact analysis which is based on an FE
model. One recognizes the fine grid ➔
600
N/mm2 N/mm2
HRC
Surface hardness
500
400
Film
300
200
100
1200
1000
800
600
400
200450 500
50 55 60 65
600 700 800
ML
ME MQ
ML
ME
MQ 17CrNiMo6
15CrNi6
16MnCr5
Case-hardened alloyed steels
High core strength (≤ 40 HRC)Medium core strength (≤ 34 HRC)Low core strength (≤ 28 HRC)(DIN 17210)
Heat-treated, flame- / induction-hardened (including tooth root fillet)
FE
Fig. 1: Materials parameters
Fig. 2: Tooth contact analysis by means of FEM
942_sigmaREPORT_2011_20-25_GB.indd 21 01.09.2011 12:00:39 Uhr
22sigma RepoRt 20/2011
New Software Solution
in the area of the tooth flanks and the tooth base. It is a charac-
teristic of FE procedures that the finer the grid, the greater the
precision. Unfortunately, the computing time increases along
with it as well. The rapid BEM methods have been preferred
for years, because they provide results of comparable quality
while reducing computing time.
When the results from the standard calculation are compared
with the results of a stress analysis, it can be seen that, while
simplified assumptions can indeed lead to initial results, it is
not until the real conditions are completely taken into account
that the potential for optimization becomes evident.
Complete transmission analysis and gear optimization
For a complete stress analysis, it is not sufficient to mod-
el only the teeth and their immediate environment. Under
loaded conditions, it is not only the tooth flanks which
become deformed, but also the gear bodies, the shafts, the
bearings and the transmission housing. This results in altered
contact conditions for the tooth flanks: The tooth flanks are
displaced by the load deformations of the housing and the
gear bodies on one hand; and become deformed themselves
on the other. Detailed knowledge of these two effects is
necessary in order to be able to begin with the optimization
of the gearing.
KIMoS and RomaxDesigner are software packages, both of
which have been in worldwide use for many years. The utili-
zation of KIMoS has however been restricted to date to the
calculation of the actual gearing; any influences on the load-
dependent deflection of the relative position of ring gear and
pinion had to be calculated outside of KIMoS. RomaxDesigner,
on the other hand, is an analysis tool which focuses on the
housing, shafts and bearings of a gearbox. This means that the
two programs complement one another in an optimal man-
ner and finally provide the user with a software tool which
analyzes the entire gearbox and thus leads to the path to
optimization. This kind of optimization can be applied not only
to tooth flanks but also to bearings, shafts and housing.
The interface between the two program systems is the
deflection of the tooth flanks and considers both the load
spectrum and the geometry of the gearing. Fig. 3 depicts all
of the degrees of freedom of the deflection of tooth flanks.
The pinion may shift in an axial direction (H) or in the direc-
tion of the perpendicular of the axes of pinion and ring gear
(V). The ring gear may also be subject to axial shifting (J)
and the shaft angle between ring gear and pinion may also
change (Σ). All imaginable spatial deflections between ring
gear and pinion can be linked to these four offsets.
In order now to describe the interaction of these two pro-
gram systems for a complete gearbox analysis, the system
limitations of KIMoS and RomaxDesigner must be clearly
understood.
Fig. 4 shows the model upon which KIMoS is based. The
gear body is regarded as a rigid body with flexible teeth. Any
deformation of the gear body must be entered in KIMoS as
a relative deflection between the rigid bodies of ring gear
and pinion, so that the deformation of the teeth can be
calculated there.
Fig. 3: Displacement of the tooth flanks in 4 degrees of freedom
Fig. 4: Rigid gear bodies and flexible teeth in KIMoS
942_sigmaREPORT_2011_20-25_GB.indd 22 01.09.2011 12:00:40 Uhr
23sigma RepoRt 20/2011
New Software Solution
In RomaxDesigner, by contrast, the teeth are considered
rigid, which means that the tooth forces have a direct influ-
ence on the flexible gear body. Fig. 5 shows the interaction
which exists between KIMoS and RomaxDesigner. One begins
first with a bevel gear design in KIMoS. After the external
gearing geometry has been defined, the contact pattern and
the parameters of the load calculation are optimized in accor-
dance with the experiences of the user. At the end of the first
step, the tooth forces and the torsional rigidity of the set of
bevel gears are calculated by KIMoS in relation to the angle
of rotation and transferred together with the exact flank
geometry and the load spectrum to RomaxDesigner.
Now begins the calculation of the entire gearing environment,
which must be present in RomaxDesigner as a complete CAD
model. The tooth forces deform the gear bodies, the bear-
ings and the housing. This is calculated as an offsetting of the
tooth flanks in relation to one another for each load level in
accordance with the deflection definition shown in Fig. 3 and
made available to KIMoS.
Example: Automobile axle gearbox
The hypoid gear assembly of a sports car is presented here as
an example. The gearbox is first depicted in the CAD system;
the result is displayed in Fig. 6 as a solid model.
The macro-geometry of the hypoid gear set is known and
input into the dimensioning module of KIMoS. Then the
micro-geometry (EaseOff curve) is optimized. The objective is
to minimize transmission error, contact and bending stress-
es considering the load-dependent deflections expected at
established torque levels. Stresses must remain under limit
values given by the material used. Assembly tolerances are
also considered in the optimization. The results of the EaseOff
development are validated in the Load Tooth Contact Analysis
module for two load levels (200 Nm and 500 Nm), with cor-
responding deflections. ➔Fig. 5: Interaction between gearing and environment
KIMoS Bevel gear calculation
RomaxDesigner Powertrain analysis
• Dimensioning• Load spectrum• Contact geometry• Tooth forces• Load analysis under
displacements
• Bearings, shafts and housing deformation
• Gear body deformation
• NVH results• Load analysis under
displacements
Fig. 6
Now that the entire environmental situation is known in
KIMoS, the gearing geometry can be optimized for these con-
ditions. Precisely targeted flank modifications are performed to
guarantee acceptable contact conditions for the load-induced
deflections and therefore ensure the capacity of the gearing to
handle the required load.
The following shows an example in which one can recognize
the potential of this approach for the optimization of bevel
gearboxes.
942_sigmaREPORT_2011_20-25_GB.indd 23 01.09.2011 12:00:42 Uhr
24sigma RepoRt 20/2011
New Software Solution
Fig. 7 shows the de-
veloped, load-free
EaseOff; Fig. 8 the
results of the tooth
contact analysis un-
der load for the two
load levels.
Up to this point, the
development of the
gearing is based on
the model used in KIMoS, in which the environment of the
gearing is assumed to be infinitely rigid and modifications in the
relative position of the meshing flanks to one another is on the
basis of assumptions.
A new path was now selected for the application example.
The gear tooth profile was exported from KIMoS for reuti-
lization in RomaxDesigner. The data exchange takes place
by means of an XML file which, in addition to the geomet-
rical values, also contains the fine geometry, specifications
regarding stresses, rotational speeds and – if available- also
regarding deflections. Parallel to this, the CAD model of the
transmission housing was networked and imported into
RomaxDesigner. The imported data was integrated into the
complete model of the powertrain in RomaxDesigner. Shafts,
bearings, seals and other relevant components were com-
piled in RomaxDesigner and combined. The resulting model
is depicted in Fig. 9. A static analysis was carried out with
this model in order to determine the deformations of the
individual components. Evaluation is possible using graphic
representation, see Fig. 10, and in numerical values.
RomaxDesigner offers major opportunities for the detailed
analysis of the entire system or of individual components.
Critical for the development of the set of beveled gears, how-
ever, are the relative deflections between the tooth flanks
located in the mesh. RomaxDesigner describes an interface
file in which the deflections determined from the overall
analysis are transformed into the coordinate system required
for KIMoS calculations with its origin in the axis intersection
point. After these deflections have been imported into
KIMoS, a tooth contact analysis was carried out under
load and taking into account these deflections. It is clearly
evident that the previously developed EaseOff needs to be
improved.
The results of the tooth contact analysis under load, taking into
account the calculated deflections, are shown in Fig. 11.
Fig. 7: Developed EaseOff and contact pattern of the basic version
Fig. 8: Results of the TCA under load for the two load levelsFig. 10.: Graphic evaluation of the displacements, based on the static analysis of the hypoid gear assembly
Fig. 9: Transmission model in RomaxDesigner
Contact pattern for Mt = 200 Nm V=0.05mm, H=0.10mm, J=0.00mm
(Gear flank, Drive) 2mm
Tip
Root
Toe
Heel Max. pressure 1012 MPa0 MPa 110 Mpa 1100 Mpa
Contact pattern for Mt = 500 Nm V=0.10mm, H=0.20mm, J=0.00mm
(Gear flank, Drive) 2mm
Tip
Root
Toe
Heel Max. pressure 1323 MPa0 MPa 140 Mpa 1400 Mpa
942_sigmaREPORT_2011_20-25_GB.indd 24 01.09.2011 12:00:45 Uhr
25sigma RepoRt 20/2011
New Software Solution
After a few targeted iterations in the KIMoS EaseOff develop-
ment, results were achieved which are depicted in Fig. 12.
It will be seen that the value for the maximum surface pres-
sure with specification of the maximum torque of 1,512 Mpa
has been reduced to 1,334 Mpa in the result of the optimi-
zation, which corresponds to a reduction of 11.8 percent.
Naturally, in addition to the distribution of the Hertzian pres-
sure, the tooth depth tension, rotational error and meshing
rigidity under load are also considered for the analysis. The
EaseOff developed should always represent the best compro-
mise for all parameters.
The procedure described is applied in precisely the same way
for the thrust side as well.
Contact pattern for Mt = 200 Nm V=0.12mm, H=0.10mm, J=0.14mm
(Gear flank, Drive) 2mm
Tip
Root
Toe
Heel Max. pressure 990 MPa0 MPa 100 Mpa 1000 Mpa
Contact pattern for Mt = 200 Nm V=0.12mm, H=0.10mm, J=0.14mm
(Gear flank, Drive) 2mm
Tip
Root
Toe
Heel Max. pressure 1072 MPa0 MPa 110 Mpa 1100 Mpa
Contact pattern for Mt = 500 Nm V=0.33mm, H=0.23mm, J=0.38mm
(Gear flank, Drive) 2mm
Tip
Root
Toe
Heel Max. pressure 1512 MPa0 MPa 160 Mpa 1600 Mpa
Contact pattern for Mt = 500 Nm V=0.33mm, H=0.23mm, J=0.38mm
(Gear flank, Drive) 2mm
Tip
Root
Toe
Heel Max. pressure 1334 MPa0 MPa 140 Mpa 1400 Mpa
Fig. 12: Results after the optimization
Fig. 11: LTCA results, taking into account the displacements determined in RomaxDesigner
James Mitchell
Lead Product EngineerRomax Technology Limited
Dr. Jamie Pears
Software Product ManagerRomax Technology Limited
Dipl.-Ing. Frank Seibicke
Chief Engineer Calculation SoftwareKlingelnberg GmbH
Dr.-Ing. Hartmuth Müller
Chief Technical Officer (CTO)Klingelnberg GmbH
Considerable savings potentials through efficient data exchange
With the development of the interface between KIMoS and
RomaxDesigner a solution has been found to simplify the
data exchange between the two systems. The great advan-
tage for the user is to be able to perform the analysis of a
complete powertrain based on the exact tooth geometry ver-
sus the time consuming FEM calculation. But what pays off
the most is that the software provides a link between the
analysis of the system and the real behavior of the powertrain
which makes time consuming and costly trials (developments)
a thing of the past. n
942_sigmaREPORT_2011_20-25_GB.indd 25 01.09.2011 12:00:51 Uhr
Complete Machining in a New Dimension
26sigma RepoRt 20/2011
27sigma RepoRt 20/2011
LDF 350
Variety instead of monoculture – with the new Liebherr turning-milling machine LDF 350, “work-in-process” is permanently reduced for the production of toothed gears and toothed gear shafts. At the same time, the company is meeting a market demand, as for many users it is important that the competency for the entire process chain remains with the gearing expert.
Complete Machining in a New Dimension
The objective was to develop and design a combined turn-
ing and hobbing machine with which turning, drilling and
hobbing work could be carried out in the same clamping
arrangement as the hobbing of the gearings and the sub-
sequent chamfering and deburring processes. The result of
this new development, Liebherr‘s response to current trends
and demands of the market, is the LDF 350. This offers the
latest technical options for the machining of cylindrical gear
gearings, not only of wheels but also of shafts.
These kinds of innovative machine concepts are in demand
because of the increasing workpiece complexity and the
wish for increasingly smaller batch sizes, for reduced cy-
cle times and for intermediate layers in production to be as
small as possible. The turning and hobbing machine LDF 350
enables the combination of different machining processes
ranging up to complete machining in a single clamping
arrangement.
One special challenge that the Liebherr engineers faced was
the controllability of both processes (turning and hobbing) for
workpieces up to a maximum diameter of 350 mm, a total
length of up to 500 mm and a maximum module of 5 mm.
The most important component of the LDF is therefore the
workpiece table which fulfills two main requirements:
high rotation speeds of the turning process and•
high rigidity of the gear hobbing. •
Sequence of the fabrication steps
Aligned in the center of the rotation machine and perma-
nently connected with the machine bed, the table ensures
high-production turning and gear hobbing.
The gripper for loading the machine and the pressure de-
burring unit are also aligned on the revolver to the left of the
workpiece table, in addition to the necessary tools for the
turning and drilling processes. The gripper takes up the blank
directly from the storage belt and sets it down on the rapid
clamping system of the workpiece table. ➔
28sigma RepoRt 20/2011
LDF 350
To the right of the workpiece table is the gearing hobbing
head. This absorbs the high forces of the hobbing pro-
cess. In order to absorb the forces of the gearing process,
Liebherr optimized the entire machine by means of FEM and
designed the guides of the radial infeed and of the stroke
and its drives to be extremely solid. This type of construction
guarantees a maximum of stability during the machining pro-
cess, so that even the highest of cutting speeds are possible
in dry machining.
New dimensions can be implemented
The combined machining enables new dimensions for the
workpieces – gearings up to module 5 mm with a maximum
diameter of 25 to 350 mm. This makes the utilization of the
LDF 350 of particular interest, even in the range of larger
gearings.
For tool changes, the hob head swivels the tool axis into
a vertical position so that the machine operator can insert
the hob mandrel in an ergonomically efficient manner. The
counterbearing is automatically tensioned and clamped.
After the gear hobbing, the revolver presses the pressure
deburring wheel into the gearing and thus eliminates the burrs
and/or applies a chamfer to the workpiece. Residual burrs on
the face sides can be eliminated by repeated stripping.
Lowering of investment expenditures, machinery and piece costs
In comparison with a conventional production line (Fig. 1)
with three individual processing machines for turning/drill-
ing, hobbing and deburring, the so-called combination cell
(Fig. 2, next page) also reduces, in addition to the logistics
outlays for loading and unloading, the non-productive times
between the machining processes. This results in a shorten-
ing of the through-put times and intermediate storage of the
workpieces is dispensed with. Product changes also proceed
more economically and more rapidly, as only one machine
needs to be retooled for this purpose. The LDF 350 can be
operated completely automatically and in conjunction with
one or more turning cells.
The machine enables the complete processing of a wide
spectrum of toothed gear shafts and toothed gears in only
one clamping arrangement. In comparison with the other
processes, this ensures a greater amount of flexibility and an
optimized throughput. Time-consuming retooling from one
workpiece type to the next with several individual machines
is dispensed with.
Given optimum conditions, the processing times of the LDF 350
can match those of the single specialized machines. This was
one of the most important objectives for the development of
the LDF 350.
As a result of the utilization of the LDF 350, the num-
ber of required machines, set up procedures and the over-
all throughput times for the complete machining of toothed Fig. 1: Conventional production line
turning
Deburring
Gear hobbing
29sigma RepoRt 20/2011
LDF 350
LDF 350
gears is drastically reduced, which means that both the invest-
ment expenditures and the workpiece costs are considerably
lowered for the user.
Main advantages of the LDF:
no reclamping, no non-productive times•
no intermediate buffering•
High flexibility resulting from the considerably simpler conver-
sion for another workpiece: Only one machine needs to be
retooled and only one clamping fixture is required.
For maximum productivity, the workpiece axis must always be
kept in production operation wherever possible: Downtimes
are intended only for changing workpieces.
Additional qualitative improvements
Complete machining also opens up new qualitative possibilities:
It enables, for example, turning over the bearing seats once
more after gear hobbing. This makes it possible to minimize
deviations prior to hardening and any warpage which might
occur to be held out in an accordingly precise manner.
Result of joint development
As a specialist for gearing processes, Liebherr implemented
this innovation together with the lathe manufacturing com-
pany of Scherer from Mömbris, a professional partner who
has mastered the initial turning process. The result of this
joint development work, the Liebherr LDF 350, is expected to
be available from autumn 2011. n
Dr.-Ing. Hansjörg Geiser
Head of Development & Design Gearing MachinesLiebherr-Verzahntechnik GmbH
Technical datamax. Module mm Module 5
Drive performance kW 15
Hob rotation speed rpm 1,500
Tool diameter mm 30 to 110
Shift path mm 180
Path X axis mm 380
Path Z axis mm 600
Swivel angle -45° to +90° (90° for tool change)
Workpiece diameter mm 25 to 350
Workpiece length mm 500
Fig. 2: Complete production in the LDF 350
30sigma RepoRt 20/2011
this industry has a tailwind: the wind power industry is growing at a rapid pace. the reasons for this are many: Ambitious climate targets, necessary Co2 emission reductions and the ongoing debate about atomic energy are ensuring a boom in the industry and thus also a flurry of activity in terms of technological advancement. Modern measurement technology for enhancing efficiency in quality assurance is an important part of this endeavor. optimum component quality is a competitive advantage which enables the wind turbine transmission manufacturers to be at the cutting edge of this technology.
Advancement Through Measurement Technology
31sigma RepoRt 20/2011
Form and Position Measurement
The industry has considerably increased the performance of
the wind power plants in recent years – this is apparent to the
outside world from the sheer size of the systems. A central pri-
ority of all of the companies participating in the development
is therefore to enhance the performance density of the indi-
vidual components in order to avoid having the dimensions
and the weight of the nacelles increase to the same extent
as the output of the system.
Most of the wind power plants operate with a transmission
in order to transfer the relatively small rotation speed of the
rotor through several transmission stages to increase the rota-
tional speed suitable for the generator of around 1,500 rpm.
To accomplish this, typically several planetary gear stages are
arranged one after the other. The measurements of the trans-
missions have also increased along with the high outputs to
be transmitted, so that the internal gearings to be used some-
times have a diameter well in excess of 2 meters.
The transmission is thus one of the key components on
which, thanks to the clever design of all components, not
only the degree of efficiency, wear and the noise emissions
can be optimized, but also the size and weight of the nacelle
can be reduced. ➔
32sigma RepoRt 20/2011
Form and Position Measurement
Innovative transmission designs
It is for this reason that certain components are deliberately
omitted, already during the development stages, in order to
obtain a transmission which is as compact and lightweight as
possible (Fig. 1). This is possible by having individual compo-
nents assume responsibility for various tasks simultaneously
which are distributed between several components in con-
ventional designs.
The internal gearing ring of the planet stages, for example,
is at the same time a load-bearing part and the outer shell
of the transmission – which means that machine holder and
housing can thus both be dispensed with. In addition, the
first of two transmission stages is integrated directly into the
main bearing.
The planetary bearing is located in turn in the
planet gear. Instead of separate external bear-
ing rings on the planet gears, correspondingly
formed bearing surfaces are ground into the
gearing component. The rolling elements of
the bearing thus run directly in the bore hole
of the gearing. The components not only
become more compact as a result, advantages
also arise at the time of assembly, sources of
errors are reduced and concentricity precision
is enhanced.
The requirements for the remaining compo-
nents are considerably increased, however –
new production processes become necessary.
As a result of the fact that the rolling elements
of the bearing run in the bore hole of the
planet gears, grinding work of bearing qual-
ity is required on the bearing surfaces. The geometry of these
bearing surfaces is in the meantime relatively complex and
has very low tolerances. This becomes clear with the example
planet gear with integrated bearing surfaces (Fig. 2).
Measuring under a different banner
As a result of the changed design, new processes are required
not only for the production of these components but also for
their quality assurance.
In order to check all of the functions of the component-
relevant parameters – which are now assigned several tasks –
measurements of dimension, form and position must now also
ø 500
0,008 C0,008 C0,015 C0,015 C0,015 B0,015 B0,015 A–B0,015 A–B
+0,08+0,06
ø 500 +0,08+0,06
580
0,008 D0,008 D0,015 D0,015 D0,015 A0,015 C0,015 A–B0,015 A–B
Fig. 1: Transmission and generator of a wind power plant (Source: Winergy)
Fig. 2: Gearing component (planet gear) from a wind turbine transmission with tolerances
33sigma RepoRt 20/2011
Comparison of the Klingelnberg measurement system with the 3-D measurement systems of coordinate measurement machines
Measurement systems from
CMM (coordinate measure-
ment machine) are usu-
ally constructed in such a
way that the kinematics for
the three coordinate direc-
tions are physically arranged
behind one another. This de-
sign with serial kinematics
has the decisive disadvan-
tage that the moved mass
in the three coordinate di-
rections may differ from one
another and furthermore,
depending on the direction,
can even be very large. In or-
der to reduce the construc-
Form and Position Measurement
be carried out in addition to the complete gearing measure-
ment. The form measurements on the bearing surfaces are
thereby particularly challenging and are very demanding of
the measuring technology applied.
The solution for minimizing the overall cycle time for all mea-
surements, including tool time, is complete measurement
designed to run automatically on only one measuring device.
Towards this end, Klingelnberg has specially developed the
P 150 W for the requirements of the wind turbine trans-
mission components on the basis of the machines of the
P series. In contrast to the familiar P machines, the new 3-D
measurement system is fitted on a perpendicularly
aligned boom so that internal bore mea-
suring is possible (Fig. 3). This means that
not only external gears but also internal
gears can be measured to an equal extent
with short probe rods. This arrangement
also offers special advantages for form
measurements in bores.
Fig. 4: Diagram of a conventional 3-D measurement system with serial kinematics
Fig. 5: Diagram of the Klingelnberg 3-D measurement system with parallel kinematics
Fig. 3: Measurement center P 150 W
tion size, these measurements systems are designed to nest
inside one another. This does not influence the disadvantage
of serial kinematics, however. Fig. 4 shows this kind of 3-D
measurement system, simplified without nesting.
In the case of form measurement, it is well known that spe-
cial demands are made on the dynamics of the measurement
system. This is also true for gear tooth measurement, which
in principle is a combination of form and 3-D measurement.
It is for this reason that the Klingelnberg 3-D measurement sys-
tems (Fig. 5) have as a general rule unique, patented parallel
kinematics with three coordinate directions nested within one
another but which are arranged next to one another in physi-
cal terms. This construction provides decisive advantages: The
moved mass is not only identical in all directions, but also and
primarily considerably less than the conventionally structured
3-D measurement systems. As a result, the measurement sys-
tems of the Klingelnberg P series are suitable not only for gear-
ing measurement and general 3-D measurement but also for
other high-resolution form measurement tasks.
A further prerequisite for form measurements on axially sym-
metrical components is the use of a high-precision rotational
bearing. The bearing of the P 150 W, for example, possesses
a static strength of 20 tons while at the same time having a
concentricity precision which is less than 0.5 micrometers. Both
the development and the production and integration of ➔
34sigma RepoRt 20/2011
Form and Position Measurement
Fig. 8: Cartesian measurement volume coordinates measurement device
Table: Schematic comparison of the Cartesian measurement volumes: The lesser volume of the P 150 W enables a very high basic precision.
this bearing is a core competency of Klingelnberg. No bear-
ing with this concentricity quality and the static strength of 20
tons is available on the market.
When a comparison is made between the conceptual structure
of the P 150 W with that of a conventional CMM (see table
above), it becomes clear which advantages can arise from the
structure of the P 150 W with three linear precision axes and
one high-precision axis of rotation.
In the case of the P 150 W, the Cartesian measurement vol-
ume set up by the three linear axes is deliberately consider-
ably smaller (Fig. 6) than is the case with a CMM. As a result,
a very high basic precision can be achieved in this measure-
ment volume, which is then additionally improved by a pat-
ented compensation procedure which was specially devel-
oped for this machine construction.
The combination of this measurement volume, which can
thus be mastered perfectly in geometric terms, and the high-
precision axis of rotation results as a whole in a considerably
larger, cylindrical measurement volume (Fig. 7) with a compa-
rably lower measurement uncertainty.
In contrast to this, the relatively large measurement volume of
a conventionally structured CMM must be compensated for
(Fig. 8). Due to the laws of physics, this is difficult to master,
very complex and must be repeated at certain intervals.
For the circular form measurement in the bore of the planet
gear described above, the circle must be generated by a com-
bined movement of two linear axes for this kind of CMM. In
doing so, a relatively large area of the measurement volume
P 150 W CMM
Volume size in mm (HxDxW)
1,500 x 600 x 800 1,500 x 1,500 x 1,500
Fig. 7: Total measurement volume P 150 W
Fig. 6: Cartesian measurement volume P 150 W
35sigma RepoRt 20/2011
Dipl.-Ing. Georg Mies
Manager R&D Measuring TechnologyKlingelnberg GmbH
Fig. 9: Measurement of a sun gear from a wind turbine transmission on a P 150 W
will be intersected by both axes, with correspondingly negative
effects on measurement accuracy. This measurement strategy
may be suitable for a coordinate measurement, but not, how-
ever, for high-precision circular measurements.
Modern measurement technology as an important part of further development
Efficient and modern measurement machines are a decisive
part of the dynamics for ongoing and future developments
in the wind power industry. They support the companies who
contribute to keeping the tailwind blowing – so that climate
targets can be achieved, emissions reduced and an alterna-
tive to both nuclear energy and CO2-intensive energies will
be strengthened. n
36sigma RepoRt 20/2011
The New Hardness for Short Grinding Times
the advantages of generating grinding with vitrified CBN grinding worms are particularly evident in comparison with established procedures. the reliable utilization of the extremely hard cutting material enables, among other things, shorter grinding time and longer tool life.
37sigma RepoRt 20/2011
Generating grinding is an established process
for the hard finishing of gears. The use of
generating grinding is very widespread in the
range of up to Module 5 mm, particularly
in industrial gear manufacturing and in the
service vehicle and automobile sector. For
Module 5 to 8 mm, profile grinding is also
used in addition to generating grinding, and
the former grinding technique is always more
widespread with larger modules. Current
trends in machinery and tool development
are opening up an ever greater potential
here for generating grinding up to Module
14 mm. In the case of generating grinding,
the following process variants are encoun-
tered on the market, each with advantages
and disadvantages with respect to process
technology: ➔
Generating grinding with electroplated CBN grinding worms
Resistant to • hardness fluctuations
High process stability through • long tool life
2-cut process for allowances • of up to 0.18 mm/flank
Machining of collision-critical • gearings
No profile correction • opportunities possible
during ongoing process
Limitations with respect to • profile form and surface quality
Generating grinding with dressable grinding worms made of corundum
Excellent profile and • surface quality
resulting from dressing in the machine
Flexible correction • opportunities for profile angle deviation fhα
Influencing of the surface • roughness through targeted modification of the dressing speed ratio
Low tool costs per workpiece•
A 3-cut process is • necessary, depending on
the allowance situation and pre-machining quality
Proportionate dressing time • per workpiece
Combination grinding (roughing with grinding worm/ finishing with profile grinding disk) with both electroplated and dressable corundum tools
Resistant to • hardness fluctuations
Excellent profile and surface • quality resulting from finishing in the profile grinding process
Machining of collision-critical • gearings with the use of electroplated CBN tools
Longer machining • time during finishing
resulting from the single indexing process
Coordination of the tool life • with CBN or of the dressing cycles with corundum for the roughing worm and the finishing disk
Vitrified CBN
38sigma RepoRt 20/2011
Vitrified CBN
Development of machining times for generating grinding with corundum
Grinding times overall have been considerably reduced with
a variety of further developments in procedures in the recent
past. Numbered among these developments are:
the development of high-performance corundum • grinding worms based on the SG corundum cutting materials or other special corundum
the further developments of ceramic bonding itself •
the optimum integration of these new, more • high-performance and/or of the proven corundum cutting materials in the ceramic matrix
One reason for the shortening of
the grinding time is that the cut-
ting speed has been increased
from 63 m/s to 75 m/s, and even
up to 80 m/s on the LCS machines.
However, the risk of thermal
joint damage also increases with
increasing cutting speed. In addi-
tion to the higher cutting speed,
increased feeds and greater cut-
ting depths per cut are also pos-
sible. This often opens up a 2-cut
process with a total allowance of
0.1 to 0.12 mm/tooth flank. At the
same time, though, the increased
grinding worm wear associated
with this must be compensated
for with greater dressing amounts. This is incorporated into
the proportional dressing time per workpiece and increases
the tool costs per workpiece.
All measures described for increasing performance when gen-
erating grinding with corundum grinding worms push the
grinding process to the limit. A different cutting material
must be selected to tap into further potential. CBN allows the
performance potential to be boosted in a risk-free and safe
way. The safety and stability limit of the grinding process is
increased and fluctuations avoided.
Table: Comparison of properties of different cutting materials important for machining
Corundum SG Corundum CBN
Structure Al2O3 Al2O3 SG-Al2O3 Chip space
Steel core Bonding (nickel)
Bonding (vitrified)
Pores Bonding (vitrified)
Pores
CBNAl2O3 Al2O3 SG-Al2O3 Chip space
Steel core Bonding (nickel)
Bonding (vitrified)
Pores Bonding (vitrified)
Pores
CBNAl2O3 Al2O3 SG-Al2O3 Chip space
Steel core Bonding (nickel)
Bonding (vitrified)
Pores Bonding (vitrified)
Pores
CBN
Bonding characteristics Multi-layer, dressing possible
Multi-layer, dressing possible
Single-layer, not dressable
Hardness [HK01] 1.850 2.150 4.500
Grain size [µm] 100–250 <1µm 100–250
Coefficient of friction[-] (with respect to steel) 0,34 0,19 0,19
Thermal conductivity[W/mK] e e
Temperature resistance[°C] 1.750 1.750 1.200
70–250
200–700
f.l.t.r.: - Tool set for combined generating and profile grinding- Vitrified CBN grinding worm- SG corundum grinding worm
39sigma RepoRt 20/2011
Vitrified CBN
Cutting material with the greatest potential for high machining performance
Cubic boron nitride, better known as CBN, is the second-
hardest cutting material after diamonds – which due to their
chemical properties are either only of limited suitability or un-
suitable for machining hardened steels. In addition to its high
Knoop hardness, CBN is outstanding for its high thermal con-
ductivity and a low coefficient of friction with respect to steel.
The advantages of CBN in comparison with other corundum
cutting materials becomes clear in light of this criterion (see
table on the previous page). This makes CBN the ideal cutting
material for the machining of hardened toothed gears – with
the potential of reducing the grinding time even further and of
increasing tool life thanks to its high wear resistance. Further-
more, CBN offers the possibility of machining materials with
a high surface hardness in excess of 64 HRC.
Development from electroplated to vitrified CBN
30 years ago, Liebherr developed generating and combi-
nation grinding with electroplated grinding tools. With the
development of a dressing unit integrated in the machine,
the possibility was opened up of profiling and sharpening
grinding worms and profile grinding disks made of corundum
on the LCS. This LCS grinding machine type has been estab-
lished on the market since 1998.
As a result of the many years of experience and the know-
ledge of the performance potential of the CBN cutting ma-
terial with the grinding of gears, and in view of the dressing
unit available in the LCS, Liebherr developed together with
two tool suppliers the idea of bonding the cutting material
CBN in a dressable ceramic matrix for grinding worms for
generating grinding. The objective here is to achieve the
performance advantages of the CBN cutting material with the
positive characteristics of the chemical bond such as:
higher flexibility for profile angle corrections • by dressing
attaining the highest profile form and surface qualities•
combining multi-layer and dressable CBN cutting • material structure for a long tool life utilization.
This basic principle was already known on the market, but
vitrified CBN grinding worms have only been used only in a
few special applications to date. A cost-effective and efficient
utilization of these tools was still not yet successfully imple-
mented in large-series production. The reason for this was that
the manufacture of vitrified CBN grinding worms and their pro-
cess-reliable dressing involved a few technical difficulties. Two
different tool systems manufactured by the Wendt and Lapport
companies were introduced at EMO 2007 in Hanover. Together
with the dresser manufacturer Dr. Kaiser and two users, the
process was then developed in a joint project ranging from
basic research to the start of production. ➔
Fig. 1: Vitrified CBN grinding worm (Wendt Co.)
REM detail exposure of the bonding structure
40sigma RepoRt 20/2011
Vitrified CBN
Challenges from the point of view of machinery and technology
For Liebherr as a manufacturer of gearing machinery, it was
important to develop the dressing and grinding process in
such a way that it would be employable on an already existing
LCS grinding machine with an integrated dressing unit. The
necessary additions with respect to machine technology
should be simple to retrofit as well.
One of the greatest challenges is represented by the dress-
ing of the vitrified CBN structure. Due to economic consid-
erations, it is on the one hand a prerequisite that the entire
dressing amount per dressing cycle is kept as low as possible.
On the other hand, the wear caused by the use of grinding
must be rectified by sufficient profiling. In order to ensure
this, the initial contact between dresser and grinding worm
must be detected down to a micrometer. In the case of the
individual infeeds for the entire dressing amount as well, only
up to 4 µm should be dressed per tooth flank in order to
ensure that the wear on the dressing tool does not become
too great. All this is made possible by the utilization of an
Acoustic Emission System (AE System). In addition to the AE
System, additional prerequisites are a very rigid dressing spin-
dle and the high-precision controllable tool spindle.
For the development of the dress-
ing technology, i.e. the dressing
speed ratio, a different strategy of
synchronus and asynchronus dress-
ing, and also the traversing speed
along the shift axis, it was advanta-
geous to carry out the single-flank
dressing usually used by Liebherr.
As a result, the processing forces
which arise when dressing the
CBN structure were considerably
reduced. It is only with the single-
flank dressing with the swiveling
dressing axis offered by the LCS
that precise adjustment or dressing,
respectively, of the pressure angle
at a point became possible.
A further focal point of develop-
ment from the point of view of
machine technology was to develop
a collision protection for the consid-
erably more expensive CBN grind-
ing worms which makes it possible
to protect the tool against either partial or entire break-outs of
worm segments or complete destruction. These kinds of colli-
sions could negate at one blow the very high tool life and the
economic efficiency associated with it. This collision protec-
tion developed by Liebherr on its own (see interview with Mr.
Florian Schuon on page 42) can be retrofitted on all LCS gear
grinding machines that have Siemens control units.
With respect to grinding technology, a new shift strategy
enabled an optimization of the tool life of the grinding worm.
For this new shift strategy, machining is not carried out in
segment shifts, as is usual on the LCS for dressable corun-
dum grinding worms, but instead is based on the example of
electroplated grinding tools with a roughing and a finishing
area. This does not involve two separate grinding worms, but
rather a mono-grinding worm which is divided into a finish-
ing area (main bearing side) and a roughing area (side oppo-
site the bearing) (Fig. 2). In each area, a prescribed number
of workpieces is ground in either axial or diagonal proce-
dure at one shift position, after which it is shifted further by a
defined offset. The following sequence is thereby maintained:
The first workpieces are each ground at the start positions at
Fig. 2: Function principle of the dynamic shift strategy
Finishing areaCounter bearing
Roughing area
Shift-Start Shift-Start
Direction Direction
Main bearing
Offset
30 P
ositi
on o
f w
orkp
iece
s 1
30 P
ositi
on o
f w
orkp
iece
s 2
diag
onal
, con
vent
iona
l
axia
l, cl
imb
50 P
ositi
on o
f w
orkp
iece
s 1
50 P
ositi
on o
f w
orkp
iece
s 2
Offset… etc. … etc.
Dyn
amic
ally
dis
plac
eabl
e SH
IFT
CEN
TER
Dep
endi
ng o
n th
e nu
mbe
r of
wor
kpie
ces
with
rou
ghin
g an
d fin
ishi
ng
Vitrified CBN
the ends of the grinding worm and then moved in the direc-
tion of the middle of the wheel by means of onward shifting.
The automatic dressing is triggered when the finishing and the
roughing areas meet in the middle of the worm.
The quantity of workpieces which can be ground for each
shift position is dependent on the grinding worm wear and
thus dependent on the allowance and the established grind-
ing parameters. The amount of the shift offset is dependent
on the respective gear geometry (module, pressure angle, ad-
dendum modification, etc.). Depending on the workpiece and
wear behavior, the length and the position of the roughing
and finishing area on the worm is managed dynamically by
the machine control unit and adjusted automatically.
This dynamic shift traversing can naturally only show its
strength if the grinding worm has a certain length and thus
makes sufficient shift positions available. In order to keep the
procurement costs of the grinding worm as low as possible,
the outside diameter can be reduced with corresponding worm
facewidth without any reduction in tool life. This is based on
the assumption of a tool spindle with high rotation speed and
one main bearing and one counter bearing. Both of these are
fulfilled by the LCS. ➔
Technology Comparison with a Machining ExampleWorkpieceModule 1.75 mm, z2 = 81
Worm facewidth 150 mm
Shift positions 24 per dressing cycle
Number of workpieces per shift position 40
24 x 40 = 960 workpieces per dressing cycle
Tim
e/Pa
rt [
min
.]
Process variation
With vitrified CBN, up to 40 times as many workpieces can be machined in a single shift position as with SG corunded worms – with a constantly high quality, as the comparison (on the right) between component no. 1 and no. 40 shows: The quality within one shift position is consistently high with all parts.
electroplated CBN: 2st, 66 m/s
SG corundum: 4st, 59 m/s
SG corundum: 4st, 75 m/s
vitrified CBN: 4st, 59 m/s
vitrified CBN: 4st, 75 m/s
41sigma RepoRt 20/2011
1st Cut 2nd Cut Dressing Idle Time Total Time
1,60
1,40
1,20
1,00
0,80
0,60
0,40
0,20
0
42sigma RepoRt 20/2011
Vitrified CBN
Collisions can result in high costs on gearing machines. Thus Liebherr offers a software solution which reduc-es the damages and their subsequent costs to a min-imum. This is particularly expedient with expensive tools and tool clamping fixtures. Florian Schuon, Con-trol Unit Development/CNC Development at Liebherr-Verzahntechnik GmbH, explains the principle of opera-tion and advantages of the unique collision monitoring in an interview.
sigma REPORT: Mr. Schuon, how do collisions happen
on gearing machines?
Florian Schuon: Collisions on gearing machines usually arise
from faulty operation or incorrect programming. Most collisions
occur as early as the setup stage when the attendant inadver-
tently selects an incorrect workpiece file that does not fit the
loaded workpiece or if the wrong direction key is pressed.
sigma REPORT: What are the difficulties in connection
with collision monitoring and how does your system
react to possible collisions?
Florian Schuon: The demand for ever-shorter machin-
ing times requires highly dynamic drives. Therefore a reduc-
tion of the torque is naturally unthinkable as a general solu-
tion. Furthermore, the monitoring should be active in manual
and automatic mode as well as in every phase of the axis
movement (rapid traverse, feed, running empty and machin-
ing). Naturally, we still continue to have a deliberate collision
during the gearing of the workpieces (hobbing, shaping,
grinding) to which the monitoring simply must not respond.
Our collision monitoring is purely a software solution which
can detect inadvertent collisions and which reacts to these
by quickly stopping the drive. Damages can be reduced to a
minimum or even prevented completely as a result.
sigma REPORT: How does your monitor function and how
does your system differ from systems of external suppliers?
Florian Schuon: The openness of new control unit genera-
tions permits the evaluation of drive signals in real time and
the initiation of reactions directly in the core of the control
unit. Rapid algorithms observe the current torque output of
the drives and link these to the process conditions. As a re-
sult of the direct assessment in the core of the control unit,
we have on the one hand the shortest reaction time, while on
the other hand we adjust our limit values dynamically to the
respective drive condition. In the event of an error, we effect
“ Reducing Damages to a Minimum or even Preventing them Completely”
Dr.-Ing. Andreas Mehr
Applications technology for grinding and shapingLiebherr-Verzahntechnik GmbH
Further development
Once the dressing and grinding technology and the grinding
machine technique were developed up to the start of produc-
tion, the next objective now is to optimize the tool life of the
grinding and dressing tools further in the series testing stage.
Initial reports from Production indicate that generating grinding
with vitrified CBN grinding worms on Liebherr gear grinding
machines can be implemented economically and with stable
reproducibility.
Currently, however, there is still no generally valid formula
which makes it possible to apply the experience gathered to
date with respect to wearing behavior and tool life to
other modules or applications. It is therefore in the interest
of Liebherr to expand its empirical knowledge in the future
in close collaboration with the users – through experiments
on other gears. n
43sigma RepoRt 20/2011
Vitrified CBN
Dipl.-Ing. (FH) Florian Schuon
Control Unit Development/CNC DevelopmentLiebherr-Verzahntechnik GmbH
a standstill as rapidly as possible. Several axes are monitored
at the same time with this system.
External systems work with sensors. They thus have no access
to information in the control unit core. For me, the greatest
disadvantage is in the reaction speed of these monitoring
systems. Due to the scanning and evaluation cycles of this
kind of sensor, the reaction speed to a collision is much too
slow and it is difficult to prevent a larger-sized damage with
this. Furthermore there is also the problem that there is no
optimum position at which, for example, a 3-D acceleration
sensor of this sort could be fitted.
sigma REPORT: On which Liebherr machines do you
install the collision monitoring?
Florian Schuon: Fundamentally speaking, monitoring is
expedient on all grinding, shaping and hobbing machines.
Particularly useful however is monitoring on machines with
relatively expensive tools. This means that collision monitor-
ing is recommended in any event for grinding machines with
tools made of dressable CBN.
sigma REPORT: Mr. Schuon, thank you
for this discussion.� n
with monitoring without monitoring
Reaction path/time 0.04 mm / ≤1 ms 18.45 mm / 448 ms
Brake path/time 0.36 mm / 20 ms 01
Deformation path 0.4 mm / 21 ms 18.45 mm / 448 ms
max. torque 4.39 Nm 37.13 Nm
max. force at collision point
4.81 kN 93.83 kN
1) 0 because reaction (contour monitoring) takes place only with movement against an absolute fixed stop
Axis speed vX1 = 2,5 m/min
without collision monitoring
with collision monitoring
Consequences of a collision of the corundum worm (head against head), at a feed rate of 4 m/min.The activated collision monitoring detects the collision immediately, stops the drive as fast as possible and minimizes the damage.
Klingelnberg GmbH Peterstrasse 45
D-42499 Hueckeswagen Fon +49 2192 81-0
Fax +49 2192 81-200 Mail [email protected]
www.klingelnberg.com
Klingelnberg AGBinzmuehlestrasse 171
CH-8050 ZurichFon +41 44 2787979Fax +41 44 2731594
Mail [email protected]
Liebherr-Verzahntechnik GmbHKaufbeurer Strasse 141
D-87437 KemptenFon +41 831 786-0
Fax +41 831 786-1279Mail [email protected]
www.liebherr.com
www.sigma-pool.com