4
Materials Chemistry and Physics 93 (2005) 395–398 Preparation, characterization and lithium-intercalation performance of different morphological molybdenum dioxide Yongguang Liang, Shuijin Yang, Zonghui Yi, Jutang Sun , Yunhong Zhou Department of Chemistry, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, PR China Received 15 November 2004; received in revised form 19 March 2005; accepted 25 March 2005 Abstract Molybdenum dioxide (MoO 2 ) powders with various morphologies were synthesized using a hydrothermal reaction and a rheological phase reaction as two novel routes. The physical characterization was carried out by TG/DTA, XRD and SEM. The electrochemical characteristics of as-prepared MoO 2 powders as anode materials for lithium batteries has also been studied and the morphological properties were found to play an important role in their lithium-intercalation activity and cycling stability. The fissile MoO 2 displays 484 mAh g 1 capacity in the initial charge process with a capacity retention of 98.9% after 20 cycles, while the porous spherical MoO 2 provides 769 mAh g 1 high capacity in the first charge process and the charge capacity decreases rapidly in subsequent cycles in the range of 0.01–2.00 V versus metallic lithium at a current density of 100 mA g 1 . The SEM and XRD results reveal that there is a correlation between the electrochemical performance of the MoO 2 powders and their morphological properties. © 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Keywords: Oxides; Chemical synthesis; Surface properties; Lithium-intercalation 1. Introduction The fast technological progress in the area of portable devices puts higher demands on high capacity rechargeable lithium-ion batteries. Since the introduction of carbon as an- ode material by Sony Company in 1990, research has been undertaken to search for new anode materials to improve the energy density and cycling performance of these practical cells. Idota et al. [1] have reported that tin-based amorphous oxides as new negative electrode materials provide a high lithium storage capacity. Recently, some metal oxides and metal-based composite oxides [2,3], and intermetallics [4,5] were also found to deliver much higher specific capacity than carbonaceous materials for which the theoretical capacity is 372 mAh g 1 [6,7]. However, there are still concerns mainly associated with the improvement of the synthesis conditions and cycling stability before these materials can be consid- ered as possible anode candidates for lithium rechargeable batteries. Corresponding author. Tel.: +86 27 87218494; fax: +86 27 68754067. E-mail address: [email protected] (J. Sun). Auborn and Barberio [8] reported the use of MoO 2 powder as possible commercial anode in 1987, but their results showed a limited success because of the poor stability of their electrolyte at low potential. Further- more, several molybdenum oxides and composite oxides, such as MoO 2+δ [9], MnMoO 4 [10], Mo y Sn x O 2 [11], V 9 Mo 6 O 40 [12], Mn 1x Mo 2x V 2(1x) O 6 [13] have been stud- ied as anode materials for lithium batteries. However, these compounds obtained by different synthesis meth- ods usually showed inconsistent lithium-intercalation prop- erties. It is meaningful to investigate the electrochemi- cal behaviors, especially the lithium-intercalation perfor- mance in these materials with different physical proper- ties. In this paper, we introduce two novel routes to the syntheses of porous spherical MoO 2 and fissile MoO 2 by a hydrothermal reaction and a rheological phase reac- tion, respectively. The physical properties of MoO 2 pow- ders with different morphologies were presented as well as the electrochemical performance of the resulting elect- rodes. 0254-0584/$ – see front matter © 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.matchemphys.2005.03.034

Preparation, characterization and lithium-intercalation performance of different morphological molybdenum dioxide

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Materials Chemistry and Physics 93 (2005) 395–398

Preparation, characterization and lithium-intercalation performance ofdifferent morphological molybdenum dioxide

Yongguang Liang, Shuijin Yang, Zonghui Yi, Jutang Sun∗, Yunhong ZhouDepartment of Chemistry, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, PR China

Received 15 November 2004; received in revised form 19 March 2005; accepted 25 March 2005

Abstract

Molybdenum dioxide (MoO2) powders with various morphologies were synthesized using a hydrothermal reaction and a rheological phasereaction as two novel routes. The physical characterization was carried out by TG/DTA, XRD and SEM. The electrochemical characteristicsof as-prepared MoO2 powders as anode materials for lithium batteries has also been studied and the morphological properties were found toplay an important role in their lithium-intercalation activity and cycling stability. The fissile MoO2 displays 484 mAh g−1 capacity in the initialcharge process with a capacity retention of 98.9% after 20 cycles, while the porous spherical MoO2 provides 769 mAh g−1 high capacity inthe first charge process and the charge capacity decreases rapidly in subsequent cycles in the range of 0.01–2.00 V versus metallic lithium ata ce of theM©

K

1

dlouecolmwc3aaeb

theirpoor

er-ides,

-ver,eth-

rop-mi-for-per-

the

reac-

welllect-

0d

current density of 100 mA g−1. The SEM and XRD results reveal that there is a correlation between the electrochemical performanoO2 powders and their morphological properties.2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

eywords:Oxides; Chemical synthesis; Surface properties; Lithium-intercalation

. Introduction

The fast technological progress in the area of portableevices puts higher demands on high capacity rechargeable

ithium-ion batteries. Since the introduction of carbon as an-de material by Sony Company in 1990, research has beenndertaken to search for new anode materials to improve thenergy density and cycling performance of these practicalells. Idota et al.[1] have reported that tin-based amorphousxides as new negative electrode materials provide a high

ithium storage capacity. Recently, some metal oxides andetal-based composite oxides[2,3], and intermetallics[4,5]ere also found to deliver much higher specific capacity thanarbonaceous materials for which the theoretical capacity is72 mAh g−1 [6,7]. However, there are still concerns mainlyssociated with the improvement of the synthesis conditionsnd cycling stability before these materials can be consid-red as possible anode candidates for lithium rechargeableatteries.

∗ Corresponding author. Tel.: +86 27 87218494; fax: +86 27 68754067.E-mail address:[email protected] (J. Sun).

Auborn and Barberio[8] reported the use of MoO2powder as possible commercial anode in 1987, butresults showed a limited success because of thestability of their electrolyte at low potential. Furthmore, several molybdenum oxides and composite oxsuch as MoO2+δ [9], MnMoO4 [10], MoySnxO2 [11],V9Mo6O40 [12], Mn1−xMo2xV2(1−x)O6 [13] have been studied as anode materials for lithium batteries. Howethese compounds obtained by different synthesis mods usually showed inconsistent lithium-intercalation perties. It is meaningful to investigate the electrochecal behaviors, especially the lithium-intercalation permance in these materials with different physical proties.

In this paper, we introduce two novel routes tosyntheses of porous spherical MoO2 and fissile MoO2by a hydrothermal reaction and a rheological phasetion, respectively. The physical properties of MoO2 pow-ders with different morphologies were presented asas the electrochemical performance of the resulting erodes.

254-0584/$ – see front matter © 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.oi:10.1016/j.matchemphys.2005.03.034

396 Y. Liang et al. / Materials Chemistry and Physics 93 (2005) 395–398

2. Experimental

2.1. Materials preparation

The MoO2·xH2O precursor was synthesized through hy-drothermal reaction method. 1.77 g (NH4)6Mo7O24·4H2Owas fully dissolved in 20.0 mL distilled water and the stirredsolution was slowly dropped with 10.0 mL N2H4·H2O. Themixture was sealed in a closed container at 130◦C for 12 h,then cooled and filtrated. The filter cake was washed succes-sively with distilled water and absolute alcohol. After driedunder vacuum at 100◦C, a brown precursor was yielded.

The oxalate precursor was prepared by a rheological phasereaction route. (NH4)6Mo7O24·4H2O and C2H4O2·2H2Owere fully mixed by grinding with a molar ratio of 1:1.05. Aproper amount of absolute alcohol was added to get a rheo-logical body. The mixture was sealed in a closed containerat 80◦C for 8 h. After dried under vacuum at 80◦C, a whiteprecursor was obtained.

2.2. Physical characterization

The thermal stability of the precursors was examined bymeans of thermogravimetry and differential thermal analysis(TG/DTA) with a Netzsch STA 449 thermal analysis systema ◦ −1 ◦o rriedo ningrp d bya

2

e desw eb ickelgs Cel-g aratorT othw ubse-q .0 and

Fig. 2. XRD patterns of the resultant samples.

0.01 V versus metallic lithium at a constant current densityof 100 mA g−1.

3. Results and discussion

The TG and DTA curves of the precursors are presented inFig. 1. It indicates that the decomposition of the MoO2·xH2O(x∼ 0.75) (Fig. 1a) proceeds one step to give amorphousMoO2 with successive loss of the adsorbed water from 79.1 to336◦C, which is different with the results reported by Man-thiram and Tsang[9]. The endothermic peak on the DTAcurve at about 171◦C is due to the loss of the adsorbed wa-ter. The sharp exothermic peak located at about 372◦C inthe DTA curves is attributed to the formation of crystallizedMoO2 [14]. As shown inFig. 1b, the pyrolysis of the oxalateprecursor proceeds with 43% mass loss from 88.5 to 332◦C.The endothermic peaks on the DTA curve at about 106 and178◦C correspond the loss of the adsorbed water and the de-composition of surplus oxalate acid. The sharp endothermicpeak located at about 258◦C is associated with the formationof crystallized MoO2, which is confirmed by the XRD data.

Fig. 2 illustrates the XRD patterns of the resultantswhen the precursors treated at 400◦C for 6 h in ar-gon atmosphere. The patterns are assigned to a sin-gle phase of MoO. MoO -H (obtained by a hydrother-m ithM TheX rep upP

rs: (a)

t a heating rate of 10C min from 25 to 700 C in a flowf argon. Identification of phases and structures was caut on a Shimadzu 6000 X-ray diffractometer at a scanate of 2◦ min−1, using Cu K� radiation (λ = 1.54056A). Thearticle sizes and morphological features were observescanning electron microscope (Hitachi SEM X-650).

.3. Electrochemical measurement

The electrochemical cell consisted of a MoO2 workinglectrode and a lithium foil counter electrode. Electroere prepared by mixing MoO2 powders with 15% acetylenlack and 5% PTFE, compressing the mixture onto a nauze current collector. A 1 mol L−1 solution of LiClO4 dis-olved in EC/DEC (1:1) was used as the electrolyte. Aard 2400 microporous membrane was used as a sephe cell was assembled in an Ar-filled glove box with bater and oxygen concentrations less than 5 ppm. Suently, the cell was discharged and charged between 2

Fig. 1. TG and DTA curves of the precurso

.

2 2al reaction) displays lower intensity comparing woO2-R (prepared by a rheological phase reaction).RD results of MoO2-H were well defined as a puhase MoO2 with monocline symmetry, space gro21/n, with cell parametersa= 5.6062(2)A, b= 4.8596(1)A,

MoO2·xH2O precursor and (b) oxalate precursor.

Y. Liang et al. / Materials Chemistry and Physics 93 (2005) 395–398 397

Fig. 3. SEM images of MoO2 powders: (a) MoO2-H and (b) MoO2-R.

Fig. 4. The discharge and charge curves of MoO2/Li test cells.

c= 5.5371(3)A, β = 119.400(2)◦, V= 131.4244(2)A3, co-inciding with JCPDS 32–0671. The data of MoO2-Rwere identified as monoclinic MoO2 (P21/c) with cell pa-rametersa= 5.6034(1)A, b= 4.8544(1)A, c= 5.6190(2)A,β = 120.858(3)◦, V= 131.207(3)A3, agreeing with JCPDS73-1807.

Fig. 3shows the SEM images of the resulting MoO2 pow-ders. As seen inFig. 3a, spherical particles with average par-ticle size of 400 nm aggregated and piled up loosely with aporous state. The presence of tight-stacked particles inFig. 3bshows fissile with diameter about 700 nm and thickness lessthan 100 nm estimated from SEM data.

The discharge–charge profiles of spherical MoO2 and fis-sile MoO2 recorded with a current density of 100 mA g−1

are presented inFig. 4. The initial discharge curves of spher-ical MoO2-H and fissile MoO2-R do not show too much

Fig. 6. Cycle performance of the obtained MoO2 samples.

difference in except of the capacity, which the former is1426 mAh g−1, the latter 996 mAh g−1. The initial chargecapacities are 769 and 484 mAh g−1, respectively. How-ever, the charge and discharge curves in the following cy-cle present characteristics. There are no distinct plateaus inMoO2-H but two constant potential plateaus in MoO2-R at1.39 and 1.70 V on charge as well as 1.57 and 1.28 V on dis-charge during charge and discharge process. Clearly, differ-ent lithium-intercalation reaction took place during the pro-cess.

In order to evaluate any structural changes of MoO2electrodes during Li ion extraction, a group of cells werestopped at different states during the initial charge pro-cess, respectively. These cells were opened in an argon-filled glove box to recover the electrodes, and the elec-trodes were subsequently rinsed in EC to remove the resid-ual LiClO4 and finally dried under vacuum. The dried elec-trodes were subjected to XRD.Fig. 5 presents the changesof XRD patterns in the electrodes. The major diffractionpeaks at different states were identified with correspondingh, k, l values. The MoO2 electrodes of both samples pre-sented amorphous phase at 0.01 V, which is coincided withsubsequent SEM images inFig. 7. The spherical MoO2-H remains amorphous phase whereas fissile MoO2-R rep-resents a transition of phase during the initial charge pro-cess.

earch[ i

F ctrodeL

ig. 5. XRD patterns of the electrodes at different states: (a) MoO2-H eleiMoO2 (#), Li0.98MoO2 (&); (3) 1.75 V, Li0.42MoO2; (4) 2.0 V, MoO2.

Based on the XRD results above and the previous res15], the possible reaction of these MoO2 electrodes with L

s and (b) MoO2-R electrodes (1) 0.01 V, fully lithiated MoO2; (2) 1.36 V,

398 Y. Liang et al. / Materials Chemistry and Physics 93 (2005) 395–398

Fig. 7. SEM image of MoO2 electrodes after the initial discharge: (a) MoO2-H and (b) MoO2-R.

during the initial charge process were presented as below:

MoO2-H :

Li3.8MoO2 → Li2.3MoO2 + 1.5Li+ + 1.5e

(0.01–1.46 V);

Li2.3MoO2 → MoO2 + 2.3Li+ + 2.3e (1.46–2.00 V).

MoO2-R :

Li2.4MoO2 → LiMoO2(Li0.98MoO2) + 1.4Li+ + 1.4e

(0.01–1.36 V);

LiMoO2 → Li0.42MoO2 + 0.58Li+ + 0.58e

(1.36–1.75 V);

Li0.42MoO2 → MoO2 + 0.42Li+ + 0.42e (1.75–2.00 V).

As seen inFigs. 4 and 5b, the inflection point betweenthese plateaus represents a transition of phase in the partiallyLixMoO2 [8,15]. When the cell was discharged through theinflection point, the capacity would decrease rapidly. How-ever, in the second discharge curve of MoO2-R test cell, thecapacity between plateaus changed little. The cycling behav-iors within 20 cycles are shown inFig. 6. The reversible ca-p sb ityr d re-v lest

p eds se int on-t -f tivec ace).T entw ile-t isb Mi nd-

ing” [16] took place in the MoO2-R electrode. Smaller par-ticles shows near sphere with average particle size about300 nm. It is crucial to MoO2 powders with proper parti-cle size as stable anode materials for lithium batteries[17].The average particle size reduced, thereby increasing theexposed surface area. So the effective current density be-came lower. At same time, lithium-ion diffusion becameeasier as well as better capacity utilization. Its coulom-bic efficiency ascended from the first cycle to the forti-eth up to 1. The different effects from two facets providethe unique cycling performance of fissile MoO2-R. Clearly,there is a correlation between the cycling performance ofMoO2 powders and their morphological properties and par-ticle sizes.

4. Conclusions

The spherical and fissile MoO2 powders were preparedthrough two novel methods and presented different lithium-intercalation performance. Morphological properties of as-prepared MoO2 play an important role in their lithium inter-calating activity and cycling stability because of the changesof structure. Proper morphology, structure and particle sizeare very suitable for fissile MoO2 to be employed as anodematerials for rechargeable lithium batteries.

A

nceF

R

ature

em.

ou,

cta

.

8.3.

[ em.

[ 000)

[ . Soc.

[ 12

[ 01.[[ 698.[ Res.

acity of MoO2-H diminished rapidly in the following cycleut the process in fissile MoO2-R was stable with a capacetention of 98.9% after 20 cycles. In fact, the observeersible capacity of MoO2 rises slowly in subsequent cycill the 13th cycle.

As mentioned above, the physic properties of MoO2-Hrovide a full Li ionic diffusion, so that the crystalliztructure changes irreversible leading amorphous phahe following cycles and a rapid fall of capacity. On crast, to large particles of MoO2-R, the rate of ionic difusion through the particle is slow relative to the effecurrent density (the rate of charge transfer at the surfhis would result in a radial lithium concentration gradiith the particle, with only the outer layers of the rut

ype crystals actively involved in lithium intercalation. Iteneficial for MoO2-R to keep its structure. From the SE

mage (Fig. 7b), a phenomenon of “electrochemical gri

cknowledgement

This work was supported by the National Natural Scieoundation of China (No. 20471044).

eferences

[1] Y. Idota, A. Matsufuji, Y. Miyasaki, Science 276 (1997) 1395.[2] P. Poizot, S. Laruelle, S. Grugeon, L. Dupont, J.M. Tarascon, N

407 (2000) 496.[3] S. Denis, E. Beudrin, M. Touboul, J.M. Tarascon, J. Electroch

Soc. 144 (1997) 4099.[4] Q.F. Dong, C.Z. Wu, M.G. Jin, Z.C. Huang, M.S. Zheng, J.K. Y

Z.G. Lin, Solid State Ionics 167 (2004) 49.[5] N. Tamura, M. Fujimoto, M. Kamino, S. Fujitani, Electrochim. A

49 (2004) 1949.[6] J.R. Dahn, T. Zheng, Y. Liu, J.S. Xue, Science 270 (1995) 590[7] H.Y. Wang, M. Yoshio, Mater. Chem. Phys. 79 (2003) 76.[8] J.J. Auborn, Y.L. Barberio, J. Electrochem. Soc. 134 (1987) 63[9] A. Manthiram, C. Tsang, J. Electrochem. Soc. 143 (1996) L1410] S.S. Kim, S. Ogura, H. Ikuta, Y. Uchimoto, M. Wakihara, Ch

Lett. 13 (2001) 760.11] M. Martos, J. Morales, L. Sanchez, Electrochim. Acta 46 (2

83.12] Y. Takeda, R. Kanno, T. Tanaka, O. Yamamoto, J. Electrochem

134 (1987) 641.13] D. Hara, H. Ikuta, Y. Uchimoto, M. Wakihara, J. Mater. Chem.

(2002) 2507.14] A. Manthiram, A. Dananjay, Y.T. Zhu, Chem. Mater. 6 (1994) 1615] J.R. Dahn, W.R. Mckinnon, Solid State Ionics 23 (1987) 1.16] Y. Piffard, F. Leroux, D. Guyomard, J. Power Sour. 68 (1997)17] D.W. Murphy, F.J. Si Salvo, J.N. Carides, J.V. Waszczak, Mater.

Bull. 13 (1978) 1395.