Upload
tullio-opatti
View
24
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Algorithm for the Prediction of Power at the
Preliminary Design Stage
Resistance & Propulsion (1)MAR 2010
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Method is appropriate for large ocean going vessels with modern slow speed direct drive
diesel engines
Method is a basic design tool using chart series diagrams
Design Scope
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Ship owner require that a ship should achieve an average speed in service at a certain engine power.
Initial acceptance will be based upon demonstration of a higher speed on trial at the same power
Vtrial = Vservice + V
(V ! 1 knot)
Design Scope
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Design Scope
Contract stipulate that the ship should achieve trial speed with the engine developing 85% of its maximum continuous power rating (MCR)
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Preliminary Prediction of Power
Estimate resistance and effective power for a range of speeds using appropriate Methodical Series
Data or Statistical Analysis Data (Holtrop & Menen)
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Preliminary Prediction of Power
methodical series or other
PE =
PE trial =
PE service =
(1 + x)PE
1.2 PE trial
From BTTP - 65 procedure
Based upon 20% sea margin
02000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0Speed (knot)
Pow
er (
kW)
Pe Trial (kW)PE Service (kW)
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Preliminary Prediction of Power
20% sea margin
Plot trial and service conditions
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Preliminary Prediction of Power
Lbp = 135.34mB = 19.3mT = 9.16mCb = 0.704
Assumed vessel particulars from previous example:
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Optimum RPM, Propeller and Engine Size
Chose maximum permissible propeller diameter with respect to hull clearances
Determine the optimum engine speeds corresponding to trial conditions, the required maximum continuous power
and the mean face pitch.
Select an appropriate engine
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Optimum RPM, Propeller and Engine Size
Using the equations provided in the handout determine the wake fraction and thrust deduction factor
DB ! 0.6T = 5.5m = DThe required diameter behind the hull is given as
This gives:
w = 0.304 t = 0.214
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Optimum RPM, Propeller and Engine Size
As the behind condition allows a smaller propeller diameter calculate the equivalent open water
diameter
DB ! 0.6T
Do =DB0.95
Corresponding open water diameter
= (5.79m)
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Optimum RPM, Propeller and Engine Size
Bp Select diagram on basis of blade number and blade area ratio
For this exercise the B4.55 diagram is to be used
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Optimum RPM, Propeller and Engine Size
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0Speed (knot)
Pow
er (
kW)
Pe Trial (kW)PE Service (kW) At TRIAL speed read off from the
plot the effective power at trial speed
Remember is not known as it requires knowledge of the
propeller hull interaction.
D
D =(1 t)(1 w) o R
D = k1 o
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Optimum RPM, Propeller and Engine Size
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0Speed (knot)
Pow
er (
kW)
Pe Trial (kW)PE Service (kW)
Therefore a value is selected and an iteration is performed
until convergence
D = 0.70
Vs (trial) = 16 knots
Pe (trial) = 3550 kW
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Optimum RPM, Propeller and Engine Size
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0Speed (knot)
Pow
er (
kW)
Pe Trial (kW)PE Service (kW)
Assume an initial D = 0.7
From the graph:
PD =PE trial
D
PD =35500.7
PD = 5071 kW
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Optimum RPM, Propeller and Engine Size
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0Speed (knot)
Pow
er (
kW)
Pe Trial (kW)PE Service (kW)
Flow through the propeller disc
VA = Vtrial(1 w)
VA = 16(1 0.304)
VA = 11.14 knots
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Optimum RPM, Propeller and Engine Size
Let:
Bp = k2 N
Bp = 1.158 NP12
D
V 2.5A
Bp = 1.158 N 507112
11.142.5
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Optimum RPM, Propeller and Engine Size
and
= k3 N
=1J
= 3.2808 NDoVA
= 3.2808 N 5.7911.14
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Preliminary Prediction of Power
Enter the BP delta values onto the diagram provided
For each RPM calculate the open water efficiency from the diagram
Plot the results
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Preliminary Prediction of Power
For a range of values of N calculate Bp
N (rpm) Bp
80 15.93 136.4 0.62
90 17.91 153.5 0.624
100 19.91 170.5 0.626
110 21.90 187.6 0.622
120 23.89 204.6 0.605
o
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Preliminary Prediction of Power
0.6
0.605
0.61
0.615
0.62
0.625
0.63
75 85 95 105 115 125
oo= 0.626
N =100
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Preliminary Prediction of Power
0.55
0.56
0.57
0.58
0.59
0.6
0.61
0.62
0.63
0.64
0.65
65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100
N
N o
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
D =(1 t)(1 w) o R
Preliminary Prediction of Power
More data is now available to update the initial estimate of D
D =(1 0.214)(1 0.304) 0.626 1.0
D = 0.707
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Preliminary Prediction of Power
To test convergence the difference from the original and new should be less than 0.005D
Continue until convergence to get N and D
0.707 - 0.7 = 0.007
use the new value of and re-calculate the delivered power and repeat BP d diagram
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Preliminary Prediction of Power
For this exercise the previous calculation is assumed converged, therefore:
D = 0.707
N = 100
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Engine Selection
Once the propulsive efficiency is known the power required for sea trials can be calculated
PB(trial) =PE trialD S
PB(trial) =3550
0.707 0.98
PB(trial) = 5123.7 kW
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
From this Break Power required to satisfy the trial speed, the contract specified that the engine should
only be at 85% of its total rating
Engine Selection
PB(installed) =PB(trial)
0.85
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
This value can now be used to calculate the required engine size
Engine Selection
PB(installed) = 6028 kW
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Finally modify the propeller diameter using the empirical relationships given previously
Re- calculate (as in example 1 of the numerical example the new diameter for the same delivered power
Bp Plot on the diagram and read the P/D ratio
Engine Selection
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Engine Selection
PD = PB(trial) s
Calculate the delivered power at the trial condition
PD = 5123.7 0.98PD = 5021.23
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Engine Selection
Calculate the delivered power at the trial condition
Bp = 19.81
= 3.2808 100 5.5011.14
= 161.97
Bp = 1.158 100 5021.2312
11.142.5
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Engine Selection
Bp = 19.81 = 161.97
P
D= 1.0
Enter the final values onto the diagram
1.0DB = 5.50mean face pitch:
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Engine Selection
Calculated optimum rpm = 100
Installed power = 6029 kW
Trial power = 5123.7 kW
Calculate the power per cylinder and use suitable engine diagrams to select an engine
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Engine Selection
R1
R2R3
R4
85% MCR
reducing fuel consumption
trial power
installed power
Engine RPM
Engine Power
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Engine Selection
R1
R2R3
R4
Engine RPM
Engine Power
1. Assume a number of Cylinders2. Calculate the required number of installed power
per cylinder3. from range of engines select the appropriate engine
with optimum RPM and power range
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Engine Selection
R1
R2R3
R4
Engine RPM
Engine Power
4 Cylinders:5123.7 / 4 (trial) = 1280.92 kW/cyl6028.0 / 4 (total) = 1509 kW/cyl
Suitable engines could be RTA68 and RTA62 at 4 cyl.
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Prediction of Service Performance
The final stage is to find the new ship service speed and propeller rate of rotation at constant power of:
PD = 0.85 PB s
i.e with the engines developing 85% of their Brake Power (including transmission losses)
PD = 5123.7 0.98 = 5021.23 kW
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Prediction of Service Performance
Caution:This method is different than the calculation for the trial condition.
For the trial condition the propeller was designed to absorb a particular power
In the service condition the propeller design is fixed :
Diameter (behind) = 5.5m Pitch = 1.0
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Prediction of Service Performance
At this new condition there will be a new wake fraction to allow for hull roughness, wind, waves, etc.
This is defined as:
w = 1.1wtrial
(assume previous values for t & )R
w = 1.1 0.304 = 0.3344
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Prediction of Service Performance
The propulsive efficiency will change for this new condition therefore another iteration must be
performed
This iteration of follows a different method than previous to obtain the optimum efficiency
D
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Prediction of Service Performance
Assume an initial value of D
PE service = PD D
Use the plots of trial and service power to read off the value. Read from the plot the service
speed this occurred PE service
PE service = 5021.23 0.7 = 3514.86 kW
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Prediction of Service Performance
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
13 14 15 16 17 18
Speed [kn]
Pow
er [
kW]
PE (service)
PE (trial)
Vs (service) = 15.25 knots
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Prediction of Service Performance
Re-calculate the advance velocity based on this power and new wake fraction
Va = Vs(1 w)Va = 15.25 (1 0.3344)Va = 10.15 knots
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Prediction of Service Performance
Let:
Bp = k4 N
Bp = 1.158 NP12
D
V 2.5A
Bp = 1.158 N 5021.2312
10.152.5
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Prediction of Service Performance
Let:
= k5 N
= 3.2808 NDVA
= 3.2808 N 5.5010.15
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Prediction of Service Performance
As before use a range of shaft rotations and calculate the new coefficients Bp
Plot these values directly on the diagram Bp
Where this curve intersects the P/D of the propeller designed previously is the required value
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Preliminary Prediction of Power
For range of values of N calculate Bp
N (rpm) Bp
80 19.99 142.16
90 22.49 159.93
100 24.99 177.77
110 27.49 195.47
o
Basic Design - BP delta diagrams
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 26th February 2008
0
BP
PD
BP
1.0
o = 0.583
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Preliminary Prediction of Power
As before use the propulsive efficiency formula below and iterate until the difference between successive
iterations is within 0.005
D =(1 t)(1 w) o R
On convergence the ship speed in service condition has been calculated
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Prediction of Service Performance
D =(1 0.214)(1 0.334) 0.583 1.0
D = 0.688
(D)assumed (D)previous = 0.7 0.688 = 0.0011
(no need for iteration)
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Prediction of Service Performance
PE (service) = 5021.23 0.688
PE (service) = 3454.60 kW
PE (service)Read from the power diagram the for 3454.6 kW
Vs (service) = 15.15 knots
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Prediction of Service Performance
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
13 14 15 16 17 18
Speed [kn]
Pow
er [
kW]
PE (service)
PE (trial)
Vs (service) = 15.15 knots
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Prediction of Service Performance
At the intersection of the new line with the pitch line read off from the diagram the Service
values of BP
BP
BP = 24.2
B = 174
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Prediction of Service Performance
Re-calculate the advance velocity for the final service speed of 15.15 knots
VA = VS(1 w)
VA = 15.15(1 0.3344)VA = 10.08 knots
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Prediction of Service Performance
Finally at the service condition calculated read off the and calculate the RPM in serviceB
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Prediction of Service Performance
= 3.2808 NDVA
N = VA
3.2808D
N =174 10.083.2808 5.50
Nservice = 97.2 rpm
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Prediction of Service Performance
Therefore at 85% MCR:
The vessels service speed is 15.15 knots
The propeller rate of rotation is 97.2 rpm
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Determination of Blade Areas
Final stage in the design algorithm is to calculate blade surface area and blade area ratio
This is performed for TRIAL condition
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Determination of Blade Areas
T = 9.16m
N = 100 rpm
VA = 16 (1 0.3044) = 11.14 knots
D = 5.50m
P
D= 1.0 o = 0.626
Using the previous trial conditions:
PD = 5021.23 kW
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Determination of Blade Areas
h =D
2+ 0.2
h = 2.95
shaft immersion at centreline
H = T - h H = 9.16 - 2.95
H = 6.21m
Text
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Determination of Blade Areas
p e = 99629 10179Hp e = 99629 10179 6.21p e = 162840.59 N/m2
The static component
Calculation of the cavitation number
r =p eqt
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Determination of Blade Areas
qt = (11.66VA)2 + (0.828 nD)2
The dynamic component
qt = (11.66 11.14)2 + (0.828 100 5.50)2
qt = 224261.2 N/m2
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Determination of Blade Areas
The resultant cavitation number becomes:
r =162840224261.2
r = 0.726
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Determination of Blade Areas
Entering this value onto the Burrill Diagram:
r = 0.726
c = 0.23
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Determination of Blade Areas
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Determination of Blade Areas
T
AP= c qT
T
AP= 0.23 224261.2 = 51580.08
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Determination of Blade Areas
T
AP= 1941.3
PD oVA
AP
AP = 10.62 m2
AP =1941.3 5021.23 0.626
11.14 51580.08
AP =1941.3 PD o
VA TAP
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Determination of Blade Areas
AD =AP
1.067 0.229PD
AD =10.62
1.067 0.229 1.0
AD = 12.67 m2
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Determination of Blade Areas
BAR =ADpiD2
4
BAR =12.67pi5.52
4
BAR = 0.533
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Determination of Blade Areas
AeAo
Selected was 0.55 Ae ADAssuming
AeAD
= 0.533
Selected area was 0.55, therefore the design will provide a low risk of cavitation
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Coursework Submission
To satisfy the requirements of the coursework the following is required:
A typed report covering the 4 stages:
1. Effective power prediction2. Design of propeller and engine3. Prediction of performance in service, 4. Blade surface area and BAR
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Coursework Submission
To satisfy the requirements of the coursework the following is required:
The report should include a detailed hand calculation for one speed (e.g. service speed)
Include tables from Excel where necessary and appropriate graphs
If you only present Excel tables and make a mistake, you cannot collect method marks.
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Coursework Submission
Submission date is:
2nd May 2008
Rod Sampson - School of Marine Science and Technology - 4th March 2008
Determination of Blade Areas
End of Presentation