Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Pregnancy-associated pyogenic sacroiliitis:case report and review
Mohammad O. Almoujahed, Riad Khatib and Joseph Baran
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, St John Hospital and Medical Center,Detroit, MI
Background: Pyogenic sacroiliitis occurs infrequently during the peripartum period.Case: A case at our institution and a review of the literature were analyzed. A total of 15 cases were discovered.The onset of illness was during pregnancy (40% of cases), within 3 weeks postpartum (40%) or post-abortion(20%), and the presentation was usually acute (< 7 days in 67% of cases). Frequent manifestations includedlocalized pain in the hips or buttock, sacroiliac joint tenderness and fever. Computed tomography or magneticresonance imaging revealed joint involvement in all cases tested. Microbiology was confirmed by blood (40%) orjoint aspirate (75%), and most patients were treated with antibiotics. Surgical intervention took place in five cases.Preterm labor was reported in only one case. All patients responded well to therapy without locomotive disability,and persistent pain was uncommon.Conclusion: Septic sacroiliitis should be considered in peripartum patients who present with fever and severelocalized pain. Medical management is usually curative, and without an adverse effect on pregnancy.
Key words: SACROILIAC JOINT; SACROILIAC JOINT INFECTION; PERIPARTUM
INTRODUCTION
Sacroiliac joint disease usually presents with lowback pain that increases with ambulation.Although the majority of cases represent non-specific arthritis, this joint can be seeded afterbacteremia, resulting in a pyogenic process1. Thiscomplication is more common in injection drugusers, although it may develop after anybacteremia1,2. If it develops during pregnancy, itmay pose a diagnostic challenge, as pain in thelower back and buttocks is common and oftennonspecific during the pregnancy and postpartum
periods3,4. We encountered such a case whichprompted us to review all previously reported casesin the English literature and to present a compre-hensive review of this subject in order tocharacterize the clinical manifestations, diagnosticapproach, therapy and prognosis.
CASE REPORT
A 26-year-old woman, gravida-1 (24 weeks’gestation), para-0, presented with severe pain inthe right buttock region. This area was mildly
Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol 2003;11:53–57
Correspondence to: Dr Joseph Baran Jr, Medical Education, St John Hospital, 22101 Moross Road, Detroit, MI 48236, USA.E-mail: [email protected]
ã 2003 The Parthenon Publishing Group 53
The findings described in this article were presented in part as Poster #22, Clinical Research 2001, American Federation for MedicalResearch, Arlington, Virginia, on 8 March 2001.
irritable for a few weeks, but the pain then becameworse and began to radiate to the leg and toincrease with ambulation. The patient deniedexperiencing feverishness, chills or other systemicsymptoms. Her medical history was negative.She claimed that she did not smoke, drink alcoholor use injection drugs.
Physical examination was significant, revealinga temperature of 38.2ºC and localized tendernessover the right sacroiliac joint. Laboratory testsrevealed leukocytosis (14.7 ´ 106 white bloodcells/l with 87.7% neutrophils), an elevatederythrocyte sedimentation rate (70 mm/hour) andasymptomatic E. coli bacteriuria. Magnetic reso-nance imaging (MRI) of the lumbar spine wasunrevealing. The patient was suspected of havingeither sacroiliitis or piriformis syndrome, and wasstarted on oral prednisone, steroid injections inthe right sacroiliac joint and cephalexin for thebacteriuria. She noted some relief of her shootingpain initially, but the remaining symptoms con-tinued to worsen. MRI of the pelvis and sacroiliacjoint was performed on day 11 after admission. Itrevealed widening of the right sacroiliac joint, asoft tissue density anterior and posterior to thejoint space, and a fluid collection measuring3 ´ 3 ´ 6 cm within the iliacus muscle anterior tothe right sacroiliac joint, consistent with sacroiliitisand a probable abscess.
A computed tomography-guided aspiration ofthe sacroiliac joint fluid collection yielded 2.2 mlof thick, brownish, chocolate-like fluid, andthe Gram stain showed Gram-positive cocci inclusters. The patient was started on cefazolin IV6 grams/day, and steroids were gradually dis-continued. Culture grew methicillin-susceptibleStaphylococcus aureus. The patient showed clinicaland radiological improvement with follow-upMRI. Cefazolin was continued for a 6-weekcourse. She subsequently had an uneventfulnormal vaginal delivery. At a follow-up visit6 months after discharge, she was doing well withnormal ambulation, although she continued tohave mild discomfort in the right buttock.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS
A total of 14 cases published in English wereidentified through a MEDLINE search for articles
(1966–2001) and relevant bibliographies. Searchterms that were used included septic sacroiliitis,sacroiliitis, sacroiliac joint, septic arthritis andpregnancy. All cases identified in addition to ourswere included in the review1,3–12. Demographics,risk factors, clinical manifestations, microbiology,radiological studies, management and outcomewere noted.
RESULTS
The mean age of the patients was 25.4 years(range 17–35 years). The onset of illness wasduring pregnancy in six cases (40%)1,4,6,10,11
(including this case) within 3 weeks of deliveryin six instances (40%)3,5,7–9 and within 3 weeksof abortion in three cases (20%)7,11,12. Amongthe postpartum cases, forceps outlet delivery wasutilized in one case, 9 days prior to presentation9.In addition, delivery was complicated by anepisode of chills and bleeding within 24 hours ofvaginal delivery in one case5, and by high feverwith disseminated intravascular coagulopathy andfetal distress in another case5. Among the threepost-abortion cases, termination of pregnancywas spontaneous in one case12, induced but in-complete in one case11, and followed inductiondue to fetal death in the other case7.
Possible risk factors were identified in eightpatients (53.3%), including injection drug use(n = 3; 20%)1,3,10, infective endocarditis (n = 2;13%)4,10, urinary tract infection (n = 3; 20%)1,6,10,endometritis (n = 2; 13%)5,11 and extensive sinus-itis requiring multiple irrigations in thepre-antibiotic era11.
The clinical characteristics are listed in Table 1.Frequent manifestations included localized pain(100% of cases), sacroiliac joint tenderness (80%)and ambulatory impairment (47%). The intervalbetween the onset of symptoms and diagnosis was2–32 days, although the majority of cases (66.7%)had an acute onset (< 7 days). Of interest, feverwas absent in a substantial number of cases (n = 5;33.3% of patients with an adequate history)1,3,6,10,12.High fever and extension of infection to thesurrounding structure were common in patientsreported in the pre-antibiotic era, presumablybecause of a delay in recognition and lack oftherapy11,12. Leukocytosis was present in eight
Review of bacterial sacroiliac joint infections in pregnancy Almoujahed et al.
54 INFECTIOUS DISEASES IN OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY
Review of bacterial sacroiliac joint infections in pregnancy Almoujahed et al.
INFECTIOUS DISEASES IN OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY 55
Age
Cultu
rec
Trea
tmen
t
Refe
renc
eYe
ars
(tim
e)a
Risk
fact
orsb
Ons
etSy
mpt
oms
Org
anism
BCJo
int
Antib
iotic
sdSu
rger
y
1 3 4 5 5 6 7 7 8 9 10 11 11 12 Cas
e
33(2
5w
eeks
)23
(1da
y)(p
ost-
P)
24(2
6w
eeks
)
26(3
wee
ks)
(pos
t-P)
26(3
wee
ks)
(pos
t-P)
18(2
8w
eeks
)35
(ata
bort
ion)
23(2
wee
ks)
(pos
t-P)
32(2
days
)(p
ost-
P)26
(9da
ys)
(pos
t-P)
17(2
4w
eeks
)
20(2
wee
ks)
(pos
t-A
)28
(32
wee
ks)
24(3
wee
ks)
(pos
t-A
)26
(24
wee
ks)
IDU
,UT
IID
U
Endo
card
itis
Endo
met
ritis
Non
e
UT
IN
one
Non
e
Non
e
Non
e
IDU
,UT
I,en
doca
rditi
sEn
dom
etrit
is
Sinu
sitis
Non
e
Non
e
Acu
te(3
days
)Su
bacu
te(2
1da
ys)
Acu
te(1
day)
Suba
cute
(21
days
)
Suba
cute
(21
days
)
Acu
te(6
days
)A
cute
Acu
te
Acu
te(1
day)
Acu
te(4
days
)
Acu
te(5
days
)
Acu
te(2
days
)
Suba
cute
Acu
te(7
days
)
Suba
cute
(14
days
)
Butt
ock
pain
Back
and
butt
ock
pain
Back
and
hip
pain
;fe
ver
Butt
ock
pain
;fev
er
Butt
ock
pain
;fev
er
Hip
pain
Butt
ock
pain
;fev
erBu
ttoc
kpa
in;f
ever
Butt
ock
pain
;fev
er
Butt
ock
pain
;fev
er
Back
and
butt
ock
pain
Leg
pain
;fev
er
Back
pain
;fev
erBa
ckpa
in
Butt
ock
pain
;fev
er
Stap
hylo
cocc
usep
ider
mid
isSt
aphy
loco
ccus
aure
us
Alp
haSt
rept
ococ
cus
Not
defin
ed
Not
defin
ed
Stap
hylo
cocc
ussp
ecie
sSt
aphy
loco
ccus
aure
usN
otde
fined
Not
defin
ed
Gro
upB
Stre
ptoc
occu
s
Stap
hylo
cocc
usau
reus
Stre
ptoc
occu
spn
eum
onia
e
Stre
ptoc
occu
spn
eum
onia
eN
otde
fined
Stap
hylo
cocc
usau
reus
- - + - ND
ND + - - + + ND - ND
ND
+ + ND
ND
ND + ND
ND - ND - + + ND +
Naf
cilli
n(4
2da
ys)
Naf
cilli
n(4
2da
ys)
Not
stat
ed(4
2da
ys)
Cef
tria
xone
(42
days
)
Pris/
Rif(
30da
ys)
Fluf
loxa
cin
Not
stat
edN
otst
ated
(56
days
)
Dic
loxa
cilli
n,ce
ftri-
axon
e(6
0da
ys)
Not
stat
ed(4
2da
ys)
Not
stat
ed(4
9da
ys)
Not
stat
ed
Not
stat
edN
otst
ated
Cef
azol
in(4
2da
ys)
Ope
ndr
aina
geN
one
Non
e
Non
e
Non
e
Ope
ndr
aina
geN
one
Non
e
Non
e
Non
e
Non
e
Rese
ctio
n
Rese
ctio
nD
ebrid
emen
t
Non
e
a Post
-P,p
ostp
artu
m;p
ost-
A,p
ost-
abor
tion;
b IDU
,inj
ectio
ndr
ugus
e;U
TI,
urin
ary
trac
tinf
ectio
n;c - ,
nega
tive;
+,p
ositi
ve;N
D,n
otdo
ne;d Pr
is,pr
istin
amyc
in;R
if,ri
fam
pin
Tab
le1
Clin
ical
char
acte
ristic
sof
pyog
enic
sacr
oilii
tisas
soci
ated
with
preg
nanc
yor
the
post
nata
lper
iod
of 13 cases (62%), and an elevated erythrocytesedimentation rate was observed in eight ofeight patients (100%).
Routine X-rays often yielded nonspecificfindings, whereas computed tomography (CT)and MRI, which were performed in seven and sixcases, respectively, showed evidence of boneerosion and joint involvement in all cases tested.A bone scan was obtained in five postpartum orpost-abortion cases, and it demonstrated increasedlocalized isotope uptake in the involved joint,consistent with sacroiliitis, in all cases. Bilateralinvolvement was uncommon (n = 2; 13.3%).
Microbiological etiology was determined in66.7% of cases. Bacteremia was documentedin four of ten cases and joint fluid culture waspositive in six of eight cases. In five cases, nomicroorganism was identified. The most commonorganism was Staphylococcus aureus.
The management was described in 14 cases.Three cases were reported in the pre-antibioticera11,12, all of which were treated with surgicaldebridement. The remaining cases received intra-venous antibiotics for 30–60 days; the medianperiod was 6 weeks. Surgical drainage wasrequired in only two cases1,6. All of the patientsrecovered, and only two patients had residualpain. Preterm labor was reported in one case3.
DISCUSSION
The diagnosis of pathologic conditions in thesacroiliac joints during pregnancy may pose adiagnostic challenge. Low back pain, which is theusual presentation of inflammatory processes inthis joint, is fairly common during pregnancy.Furthermore, the rare incidence of the disease,the nonspecific symptoms and the difficulty inlocalizing the pain without careful examinationall contribute to the problem of establishingthe diagnosis. Therefore when pregnant womendevelop septic sacroiliitis, the initial manifestationscan be attributed to pregnancy-associated arthro-pathy. The presenting manifestations are still
nonspecific and fever is absent in a substantialnumber of patients. Our case illustrates thischallenge. This patient presented with increasingbackache that was initially attributed to nervecompression. The sacroiliac source was not sus-pected for several days.
Our review illustrates the fact that this condi-tion is relatively rare. In a comprehensive reviewof all relevant publications from 1878 to 1990,Vyskocil et al.1 identified 163 cases of pyogenicsacroiliitis, only four of which were associated withpregnancy1. Since then, we have found ten addi-tional cases3–12. Our findings demonstrate thatwithout proper diagnosis and treatment, theinfection frequently extends to the periarticularstructures11,12. In addition, in cases that involvedpreterm labor or fetal death, it is uncertain whetherjoint infection preceded, coincided with orfollowed these obstetric events3,7,11.
The pathogenesis of the condition is suspectedto be hematogenous. In support of this conclusion,this condition was seen either in patients with ahistory of injection drug use or in those who hadrecently had an infection elsewhere, includingendocarditis, sinusitis and urinary tract infection.The most common organism was Staphylococcusaureus.
With regard to diagnosis, routine X-ray wasrarely helpful. Bone scan was helpful, but it shouldonly be done during the postpartum periodbecause of concerns about radiation exposure. CTand MRI are both very helpful. MRI is probablythe method of choice in pregnancy, as it providesa highly sensitive means of detailed evaluationof the joint and surrounding soft tissue withoutexposing the fetus to ionizing radiation4.
The treatment for pregnancy-related bacterialsacroiliitis is similar to that for nonpregnancy-related cases. Most authors recommend 4–6 weeksof parenteral antibiotic therapy. Only two patientsrequired surgical drainage after initiating anti-biotics, and in both cases the disease extendedto the surrounding structure1,6. The outcome oftreatment appears to be favorable.
Review of bacterial sacroiliac joint infections in pregnancy Almoujahed et al.
56 INFECTIOUS DISEASES IN OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY
REFERENCES1. Vyskocil J, McIlroy M, Brennan T, et al. Pyogenic
infection of the sacroiliac joint: case report andreview of the literature. Medicine 1991;70:188–97
2. Zimmermann B III, Mikolich DJ, Lally EV. Septicsacroiliitis. Semin Arthritis Rheum 1996;26:592–604
3. Gordon G, Kabins SA. Pyogenic sacroiliitis. Am JMed 1980;69:50–6
4. Wilbur A, Langer B, Spigos D. Diagnosis ofsacroiliac joint infection in pregnancy by magneticresonance imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 1998;6:341–3
5. Tisserant R, Loeuille D, Pere P, et al. Septicsacroiliitis during the postpartal period: diagnosticcontribution of magnetic resonance imaging.Rev Rhum 1999;66:512–15
6. Sandrasegaran K, Saifudin A, Coral A, et al.Magnetic resonance imaging of septic sacroiliitis.Skeletal Radiol 1994;23:289–92
7. Siam A, Hammoudeh M, Uwaydah A. Pyogenicsacroiliitis in Qatar. Br J Rheumatol 1993;32:699–701
8. Linnet K, Kammelgaard L, Johansen M, et al.Bilateral pyogenic sacroiliitis following uncompli-cated pregnancy and labor. Acta Obstet GynecolScand 1996;75:950–1
9. Jedwab M, Ovadia S, Dan M. Pyogenic sacroiliitisin pregnancy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1999;65:303–4
10. Egerman RS, Mabie WC, Eifrid M, et al.Sacroiliitis associated with pyelonephritis inpregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 1995;85:834–5
11. Chandler F. Pneumococcic infection of thesacroiliac joint complicating pregnancy. JAMA1933;101:114–16
12. L’Episcopo JB. Suppurative arthritis of thesacroiliac joint. Ann Surg 1936;104:289–303
RECEIVED 07/16/02; ACCEPTED 10/08/02
Review of bacterial sacroiliac joint infections in pregnancy Almoujahed et al.
INFECTIOUS DISEASES IN OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY 57
Submit your manuscripts athttp://www.hindawi.com
Stem CellsInternational
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
MEDIATORSINFLAMMATION
of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Behavioural Neurology
EndocrinologyInternational Journal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Disease Markers
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
BioMed Research International
OncologyJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
PPAR Research
The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Immunology ResearchHindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Journal of
ObesityJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine
OphthalmologyJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Diabetes ResearchJournal of
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Research and TreatmentAIDS
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Gastroenterology Research and Practice
Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014
Parkinson’s Disease
Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine
Volume 2014Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com