ppm 2015 Volume 1 FDOT

7/25/2019 ppm 2015 Volume 1 FDOT

1/914


2/914


3/914

PLANS PREPARATION MANUAL

VOLUME 1

ROADWAY DESIGN OFFICE

TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA

JANUARY 1, 2013 EDITION

Revised January 1, 2015

http://www.dot.state.fl.us/rddesign/PPMManual/PPM.shtm
http://www.dot.state.fl.us/rddesign/PPMManual/PPM.shtmhttp://www.dot.state.fl.us/rddesign/PPMManual/PPM.shtmhttp://www.dot.state.fl.us/rddesign/PPMManual/PPM.shtm


4/914

THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY


5/914

Topic #625-000-007 January 1, 2013Plans Preparation Manual, Volume 1 - English

PLANS PREPARATION MANUAL

REGISTRATION

The Department of Transportation has created a new contact database that will enable the Department toe-mail important information to registered users on topics selected by each user. The database is willallow a user to update their e-mail address, topics of interest and any other information in their profile atany time. The information users provide will not be shared with any other company or agency.

All PPM users (and other Roadway Design manual users) must register their e-mail addresses in thiscontact database in order to receive future updates, notices, design memos, or other importantinformation concerning the Department's design manuals. The old database of PPM users is nolonger in use, and registrations of current PPM users in the old database were not automaticallyimported into the new contact database. PPM users who have not already done so must register inthe new contact database at the following link:

http://www2.dot.state.fl.us/contactmanagement/
http://www2.dot.state.fl.us/contactmanagement/http://www2.dot.state.fl.us/contactmanagement/http://www2.dot.state.fl.us/contactmanagement/


6/914




7/914


STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

SUGGESTIONS AND COMMENTSPLANS PREPARATION MANUAL

NAME OF FIRM OR

FDOT DEPARTMENT:

PHYSICAL ADDRESS:

NAME OF PERSONRESPONSIBLE FORSUGGESTIONS ORCOMMENTS:

EMAIL ADDRESS:

TELEPHONE NO.:

FAX NO.:

SUGGESTIONS

OR COMMENTS:

(Comments or Suggestions may be attached as marked up copies of pages from the manual)

Please complete the requested information on a copy of this sheet and return to:

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIONROADWAY DESIGN OFFICE

MAIL STATION 32605 SUWANNEE STREET

TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399-0450FAX NUMBER (850) 414-5261


8/914




9/914

Topic #625-000-007 January 1, 2013Plans Preparation Manual, Volume 1 English Revised July 1, 2013

Table of Contents i

Table of Contents

Introduction Plans Preparation Manual, Volume 1

Chapter 1 Design ControlsChapter 2 Design Geometrics and Criteria

Chapter 3 Earthwork

Chapter 4 Roadside Safety

Chapter 5 Utilities

Chapter 6 Railroad Crossing

Chapter 7 Traffic and ITS Design

Chapter 8 Pedestrian, Bicycle and Public Transit Facilities

Chapter 9 Landscape and Community Features

Chapter 10 Transportation Management PlanChapter 11 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan

Chapter 12 Right of Way

Chapter 13 Initial Engineering Design Process

Chapter 14 Final Engineering Design Process

Chapter 15 Update Engineering Design Process

Chapter 16 Design Submittals

Chapter 17 Engineering Design Estimate Process

Chapter 18 Quality Assurance and Quality Control

Chapter 19 Sealing Design Documents

Chapter 20 Plans Processing and RevisionsChapter 21 Transportation Design for Livable Communities

Chapter 22 Lump Sum Project Guidelines

Chapter 23 Design Exceptions and Design Variations

Chapter 24 Federal Aid Project Certification

Chapter 25 Floridas Design Criteria for Resurfacing, Restoration andRehabilitation (RRR) of Streets and Highways

Chapter 26 Bridge Project Development

Chapter 27 Hydraulic Data and Agency Permits

Chapter 28 Shop and Erection Drawings

Chapter 29 Structural Supports for Signs, Luminaires, and Traffic Signals

Chapter 30 Retaining Walls

Chapter 31 Geosynthetic Design

Chapter 32 Noise Barriers

Chapter 33 Reinforced Concrete Box and Three-Sided Culverts


10/914

Topic #625-000-007 January 1, 2013Plans Preparation Manual, Volume 1 English Revised July 1, 2013

Table of Contents ii



11/914

Topic #625-000-007 January 1, 2013Plans Preparation Manual, Volume 1 English Revised January 1, 2015

Introduction

Plans Preparation Manual, Volume 1

PURPOSE:

This Plans Preparation Manual, Volume 1 sets forth geometric and other designcriteria, as well as procedures, for Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT)projects. The information contained herein applies to the preparation of contract plansfor roadways and structures.

AUTHORITY:

Sections 20.23(4)(a) and 334.048(3), Florida Statutes.

SCOPE:

This procedure impacts anyone preparing roadway and structures construction plans forthe Department.

GENERAL INFORMATION:

Chapter 334 of the Florida Statutes, as part of the Florida Transportation Code,establishes the responsibilities of the State, counties, and municipalities for the planningand development of the transportation systems serving the people of Florida, with theobjective of assuring development of an integrated, balanced statewide system. TheCode's purpose is to protect the safety and general welfare of the people of the Stateand to preserve and improve all transportation facilities in Florida. Under Section334.048(3), the Code sets forth the powers and duties of the Department ofTransportation including to adopt rules, procedures and standards for the conduct of itsbusiness operations and the implementation of any provisions of law for which theDepartment is responsible.

PROCEDURE:

The criteria in this manual represent requirements for the State Highway System whichmust be met for the design of FDOT projects unless approved Design Exceptions orDesign Variations are obtained in accordance with procedures outlined in this manual.

Introduction I-1


12/914


Roadway and structures design is primarily a matter of sound application of acceptableengineering criteria and standards. While the criteria contained in this manual provide a

basis for uniform design practice for typical roadway design situations, precisestandards which would apply to individual situations must rely on good engineeringpractice and analyses.

Special requirements for Non-Conventional Projects, e.g., Design-Build Projects and allNon-Design-Bid-Build Public-Private-Partnership Projects, may be shown in aModification for Non-Conventional Projects box as shown in the following example:

These boxes are located at the beginning of the chapter or after a section, paragraph ortable which is to be modified. The requirements listed within these boxes are onlyapplicable to Non-Conventional Projects.

The Author of a Request for Proposal (RFP) for a Non-Conventional project shall usethe standard boilerplate language as a starting point in developing RFPs on allDepartment Design-Build projects. Section V of the Design-Build Boilerplateestablishes Department, FHWA and AASHTO criteria, procedures, guidelines anddesign codes that serve as design constraints to be used in the performance of thework. The governing regulations list in Section V cannot be modified without theapproval of the State Construction Office. The standard boilerplate language isavailable at the FDOT Construction Office website:

http://www.dot.state.fl.us/construction/DesignBuild/DBDocuments/DBDocsMain.shtm

Pre-scoping questions have been developed to aid in the establishment of projectconstraints and requirements to be included in the RFP. The Pre-scoping questionscan be found at:

http://www.dot.state.fl.us/construction/DesignBuild/DBRules/DBRulesMain.shtm

Modification for Non-Conventional Projects:

Delete PPM7.2.5 and replace with the following:

7.2.5 Signing Project Coordination

The Design-Build firm shall submit a master signing plan with the TechnicalProposal. The master signing plan can be on a roll plot.

Introduction I-2
http://www.dot.state.fl.us/construction/DesignBuild/DBDocuments/DBDocsMain.shtmhttp://www.dot.state.fl.us/construction/DesignBuild/DBDocuments/DBDocsMain.shtmhttp://www.dot.state.fl.us/construction/DesignBuild/DBRules/DBRulesMain.shtmhttp://www.dot.state.fl.us/construction/DesignBuild/DBRules/DBRulesMain.shtmhttp://www.dot.state.fl.us/construction/DesignBuild/DBRules/DBRulesMain.shtmhttp://www.dot.state.fl.us/construction/DesignBuild/DBDocuments/DBDocsMain.shtm


13/914


Situations will exist where these criteria will not apply. The inappropriate use of andadherence to these criteria does not exempt the engineer from the professional

responsibility of developing an appropriate design. The engineer is responsible foridentifying those criteria which may not apply to a particular design, and for obtainingthe necessary Design Exception or Design Variation to achieve proper design.

1. PLANS PREPARATION MANUAL, VOLUME 1 -MANUAL ORGANIZATION

a. Background

The Florida Department of Transportation Plans Preparation Manual(PPM) was published in the current format in January 1998. The criteria inthe 1998 PPM were given in metric units.

b. Organization

The Plans Preparation Manual is a two-volume manual. Volume 1contains the design criteria and process and Volume 2contains materialconcerning plans preparation and assembly.

2. DISTRIBUTION

This document is available electronically on the PPM web page:

http://www.dot.state.fl.us/rddesign/PPMManual/PPM.shtm

PPM users can register to receive notification of updates and Roadway DesignBulletinsonline through the Departments Contact Management Database at:

http://www2.dot.state.fl.us/contactmanagement/

For information on updates and Roadway Design Bulletins, contact:

Roadway Design Office, Mail Station 32Telephone (850) 414-4310FAX Number (850) 414-5261http://www.dot.state.fl.us/rddesign/

3. REVISIONS AND UPDATES

Plans Preparation Manual(PPM) users are encouraged to submit comments and

suggestions for changes to the manual to the State Roadway Design Office.When ideas or suggestions are received they will be reviewed by appropriateRoadway and/or Structures Design staff in a timely manner and will be coordinatedwith other offices affected by the proposed change. Items warranting immediatechange will be made with the approval of the State Roadway Design Engineerand/or State Structures Design Engineer in the form of a Design Bulletin.

Introduction I-3
http://www.dot.state.fl.us/rddesign/PPMManual/PPM.shtmhttp://www.dot.state.fl.us/rddesign/PPMManual/PPM.shtmhttp://www2.dot.state.fl.us/contactmanagement/http://www2.dot.state.fl.us/contactmanagement/http://www.dot.state.fl.us/rddesign/http://www.dot.state.fl.us/rddesign/http://www2.dot.state.fl.us/contactmanagement/http://www.dot.state.fl.us/rddesign/PPMManual/PPM.shtm


14/914


Roadway Design Bulletinsare numbered based on the two digit calendar yearand bulletin number (YY-##). Notices are sent to all users who are registered to

receive notifications for Roadway Design Bulletins and updates to the PPM.Design Bulletins affecting the PPMwill remain effective until either:

1. An official manual revision is published; or

2. The Design Bulletinis made void.

Roadway Design Bulletinsare posted online at:

http://www.dot.state.fl.us/rddesign/bulletin/

Structures design issues, which are subject to modification and revision, will beprocessed in coordination with the State Structures Design Office. See theStructures Manualfor more information on this process.

Proposed revisions are distributed in draft form to each Districts RoadwayDesign Engineer or Structures Design Engineer. These experienced engineersprovide the necessary technical and practical input on how the revision willpotentially affect their Districts operations and customers. Periodically, theseengineers meet collectively with the State Roadway Design Office or the StateStructures Design Office to discuss comments on the proposed revisions.Proposed revisions with comments are then presented to the District DesignEngineers (DDE) for review and comment. Once the comments are addressed,the Florida FHWA Division Office is given the opportunity to review the revisions

as per the Departments Partnership Agreement with FHWA.

The State Roadway Design Office will also coordinate proposed revisions oradditions with affected offices within the Central Office. Substantive revisionsthat result in policy change may be coordinated with the Executive Committeefor adoption.

Revisions and updates are adopted or rejected by the State Roadway DesignEngineer (for Roadway Design issues) or the State Structures Design Engineer(for Structures Design issues). Requirements mandated by FHWA or StateRules will be coordinated with the DDEs and affected offices within the Central

Office and are considered compulsory.

All revisions and updates will be coordinated with the Forms and ProceduresOffice prior to publishing to ensure conformance with and incorporation into theDepartment's Standard Operating System.

Introduction I-4
http://www.dot.state.fl.us/rddesign/bulletin/http://www.dot.state.fl.us/rddesign/bulletin/http://www.dot.state.fl.us/rddesign/bulletin/


15/914


Notification of the adopted revisions and addenda will be distributed to registeredusers of the manual through the Departments Contact Management Database.

TRAINING:

None required.

FORMS ACCESS:

Documents marked as Exhibitsprovide only a starting point allowing users to changeor alter the document as needed to fit specific situations. These Exhibits are not officialforms of the Department. Templates for these documents are available online at:

http://www.dot.state.fl.us/rddesign/PPMManual/NForms/PPMForm.shtm

Introduction I-5
http://www.dot.state.fl.us/rddesign/PPMManual/NForms/PPMForm.shtmhttp://www.dot.state.fl.us/rddesign/PPMManual/NForms/PPMForm.shtmhttp://www.dot.state.fl.us/rddesign/PPMManual/NForms/PPMForm.shtm


16/914


GLOSSARY OF TERMS:

In the application of the criteria in this manual, the following definitions are assigned forconsistency of understanding and interpretation.

1. Arter ials: Divided or undivided, relatively continuous routes that primarilyserve through traffic, high traffic volumes, and long average trip lengths.Traffic movement is of primary importance, with abutting land access ofsecondary importance. Arterials include expressways without full control ofaccess, US numbered routes and principal state routes. May be classifiedas urban or rural.

2. Auxi liary Lane: The designated widths of roadway pavement marked to

separate speed change, turning, passing and climbing maneuvers fromthrough traffic. They may also provide short capacity segments.

3. Bicycle Lane: A bicycle lane (bike lane) is a portion of a roadway (eitherwith curb and gutter or a flush shoulder) which has been designated bystriping and special pavement markings for the preferential use by bicyclists.

4. Bicycle Way: Any road, path or way which by law is open to bicycle travel,regardless of whether such facilities are signed and marked for the preferentialuse by bicyclists or are to be shared with other transportation modes.Examples include bicycle lanes, paved shoulders, shared use paths, and

traffic lanes.

5. C-D Roads: Collector-Distributor Roads are limited access roadwaysprovided within a single interchange, or continuously through two or moreinterchanges on a freeway segment. They provide access to and from thefreeway, and reduce and control the number of ingress and egress points onthe through freeway. They are similar to continuous frontage roads exceptthat access to abutting property is not permitted.

6. Collectors: Divided or undivided routes which serve to link arterial routeswith local roads or major traffic generators. They serve as transition linkbetween mobility needs and land use needs. Collectors include minor stateroutes, major county roads, and major urban and suburban streets.

7. Conventional Projects: Projects for which the preparation of the contractdocuments is a stand-alone effort resulting in Plans, Specifications andEstimates required to advertise a Construction Contract.

Introduction I-6


17/914


8. Freeways: Divided arterial highways, with full control of access. Movementof traffic free of interference and conflicts is of primary importance. Essential

elements include medians, grade separations, interchanges, and, in somecases, collector-distributor roads and frontage roads. Freeways includeInterstate, toll road and expressway systems. May be classified as urban or rural.

9. High Speed: Descriptive term used to summarize all conditions governingthe selection of Design Speeds 50 mph and greater.

10. HOV Lane: Special designated widths of pavement marked to provide travellanes for high occupancy vehicles (HOV). They may be directly adjacent toother travel lanes or separated.

11. Local Roads: Routes which provide high access to abutting property, lowaverage traffic volumes, short average trip lengths and on which through trafficmovements are not of primary importance. Local roads include minor countyroads, minor urban and suburban subdivision streets, and graded or unimprovedroads.

12. Low Speed: Descriptive term used to summarize all conditions governingthe selection of Design Speed of less than 50 mph.

13. Low Volume and High Volume: Descriptive terms used to describe certain

operating characteristics and driver expectancy on highways. Criteria forsome elements are selected according to these qualifying controls.Standards for these controls are given in the table following this section.

14. Match Existing: This term is used when the existing cross slopes are toremain. This is applicable to constant depth milling and resurfacing.

15. Paratransit: Comparable transportation service required by the ADA forindividuals with disabilities who are unable to use fixed route transportationsystems. The specific requirements and parameters for this service,

including eligibility and service requirements, are contained in 49 CFR Part37, Subpart F.

16. Pedestrian Access Route: A continuous and unobstructed path of travelprovided for pedestrians with disabilities within or coinciding with apedestrian way.

Introduction I-7


18/914


17. Pedestrian Way: A space for pedestrian travel separated from traffic lanes.Sidewalks, shared use paths, footpaths and shoulders are considered to be

pedestrian ways. However, footpaths and shoulders are not accessiblefacilities, since they lack specific improvements or provisions toaccommodate persons using mobility aids.

18. Ramp:A turning roadway that connects two or more legs at an interchange. Thecomponents of a ramp are a terminal at each leg and a connecting road. Thegeometry of the connecting road usually involves some curvature and a grade.

19. Roadway: The portion of a highway, including shoulders, for vehicular use.A divided highway is a facility that provides a separation between opposingtraffic lanes.

20. Rural Areas: Places outside the boundaries of concentrated populationsthat accommodate higher speeds, longer trip lengths and freedom ofmovement, and are relatively free of street and highway networks. Ruralenvironments are surroundings of similar characteristics.

21. Strategic Intermodal System (SIS): A transportation system comprised offacilities and services of statewide and interregional significance, includingappropriate components of all modes. The highway component includes alldesignated SIS Highway Corridors, Emerging SIS Highway Corridors, SIS

Intermodal Connectors, and Emerging SIS Highway Intermodal Connectors.

22. Streets: The local system which provides direct access to residentialneighborhoods and business districts, connects these areas to the higher orderroad systems and offers the highest access to abutting property; sometimesdeliberately discouraging through-traffic movement and high speeds.

Note: Local roads and streets are not generally a part of the State HighwaySystem and therefore, may not be governed by the FDOT roadway designcriteria, but by the Manual of Uniform Minimum Standards for Design,Construction and Maintenance for Streets and Highways and/or criteria

established by the local government.

23. Traffic Lane/Traveled Way: The designated widths of roadway pavement,exclusive of shoulders and bicycle lanes, marked to separate opposing trafficor vehicles traveling in the same direction. Traffic lanes include through travellanes, auxiliary lanes, turn lanes, weaving, passing, and climbing lanes. They

Introduction I-8


19/914


provide space for passenger cars, trucks, buses, recreational vehicles and, insome cases, bicycles.

24. Travel Lane:The designated widths of roadway pavement marked to carrythrough traffic and to separate it from opposing traffic or traffic occupyingother traffic lanes. Generally, travel lanes equate to the basic number oflanes for a facility.

25. Truck Traffic: When significant, heavy, substantial, high percent, etc. trucktraffic is used as a qualifying control, it shall mean 10% of the AADT or 10% ofthe daily count (24 hr.)

26. Urban Area: A geographic region comprising as a minimum the area insidethe United States Bureau of the Census boundary of an urban place with apopulation of 5,000 or more persons, expanded to include adjacent developedareas as provided for by Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) regulations.The FHWA Urban Boundary maps are available online at:

Urban Area 1-Mile Buffer Maps

27. Urbanized Area: A geographic region comprising as a minimum the areainside an urban place of 50,000 or more persons, as designated by the UnitedStates Bureau of the Census, expanded to include adjacent developed areasas provided for by Federal Highway Administration regulations. Urban areas

with a population of fewer than 50,000 persons which are located within theexpanded boundary of an urbanized area are not separately recognized.

Introduction I-9
http://www.dot.state.fl.us/rddesign/PPMManual/PPM.shtmhttp://www.dot.state.fl.us/rddesign/PPMManual/PPM.shtm


20/914


STANDARDS FOR LOW AND HIGH VOLUME HIGHWAYS IN ANNUALAVERAGE DAILY VOLUMES

HIGHWAY TYPE LOW VOLUME HIGH VOLUMEAADT AADT

FREEWAY - URBAN4-LANE FACILITY 57,000 69,0006-LANE FACILITY 86,000 103,0008-LANE FACILITY 114,000 138,000

FREEWAY - RURAL4-LANE FACILITY 46,000 56,0006-LANE FACILITY 69,000 83,000

8-LANE FACILITY 92,000 111,000

ARTERIALS - URBAN2-LANE FACILITY 16,000 20,0004-LANE FACILITY 37,000 43,0006-LANE FACILITY 55,000 64,0008-LANE FACILITY 69,000 80,000

ARTERIALS - RURAL2-LANE FACILITY 9,000 14,0004-LANE FACILITY 38,000 47,0006-LANE FACILITY 58,000 71,000

COLLECTOR - URBAN

2-LANE FACILITY 11,000 16,0004-LANE FACILITY 37,000 45,000

COLLECTOR - RURAL2-LANE FACILITY 8,000 13,0004-LANE FACILITY 30,000 38,000

LOW VOLUME FACILITIES ARE HIGHWAY TYPES WITH PROJECTED DESIGN YEAR AADTVOLUME EQUAL TO OR LESS THAN THE LOW VOLUME VALUES SHOWN.

HIGH VOLUMEFACILITIES ARE HIGHWAY TYPES WITH PROJECTED DESIGN YEARAADT

VOLUME EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN THE HIGH VOLUME VALUES SHOWN.

Introduction I-10


21/914


Chapter 1

Design Controls

1.1 General ...................................................................................... 1-1

1.2 Traffic ......................................................................................... 1-1

1.3 Capacity and Level of Service .................................................... 1-3

1.4 Roadway Functional and System Classification ......................... 1-4

1.5 RRR Design ............................................................................... 1-4

1.6 Design Consistency and Driver Expectancy ............................... 1-5

1.7 Transportation Design for Livable Communities (TDLC) ............ 1-7

1.7.1 Policy Statement ........................................................ 1-7

1.7.2 Aesthetics .................................................................. 1-7

1.8 Access Management .................................................................. 1-9

1.9 Design Speed .......................................................................... 1-13

1.9.1 Design Speed Coordination and Approvals .............. 1-13

1.10 Public Involvement ................................................................... 1-16

1.11 Context Sensitive Solutions in Design ...................................... 1-18

1.12 Design Vehicle ......................................................................... 1-19

Design Controls 1-i


22/914


Tables

Table 1.8.1

Freeway Interchange Spacing .................................. 1-11

Table 1.8.2 Arterial Access Management Classifications &Standards ................................................................. 1-11

Table 1.8.3 Interim Access Management Standards ................... 1-12

Table 1.9.1 Design Speed State Highway System - Non-SISFacilities ................................................................... 1-14

Table 1.9.2 Minimum Design Speed SIS ..................................... 1-15

Figures

Figure 1.12.1 Florida Interstate Semitrailer (WB-62FL) .................. 1-19

Design Controls 1-ii


23/914


Chapter 1

Design Controls

1.1 General

Designs for highway and street projects are based on established design controls for thevarious elements of the project such as width of roadway, side slopes, horizontal andvertical alignment, drainage considerations and intersecting roads. Selection of theappropriate criteria and standards is influenced by traffic volume and composition, desiredlevels of service, functional classification, terrain features, roadside developments,

environmental considerations and other individual characteristics.

The identification of applicable design controls is basic to providing the desired level ofservice, optimum safety, and cost effectiveness.

1.2 Traffic

It is the Departments responsibility to provide for an interconnected transportationsystem to insure the mobility of people and goods. In order to achieve these objectives,designers must determine if the proposed improvements will satisfy future needs bycomparing the forecast directional hourly volume with the traffic handling capacity of animproved facility. Project traffic forecasts and capacity are used to establish the numberof through lanes, length of auxiliary lanes, signalization timings, right of wayrequirements, etc., so that the facility will operate at an acceptable level of servicethrough the design year.

Roadway geometric design shall be based on project traffic for the design year. Thedesign year for new construction and reconstruction projects shall be 20 years after theproject is opened to traffic. The Design Hourly Volume (DHV) is determined through theuse of the Departments Standard K factors, as provided by the FDOT Transportation

Statistics Office. The Standard K factors can be found in the Departments ProjectTraffic Forecasting Handbook.

The traffic forecast is also used in pavement design to determine the vehicular loadingson the pavement. The proposed pavement design must provide structural strengththrough the pavements service life. On pavement rehabilitation, the design year for

Design Controls 1-1


24/914


pavement design varies from 8 to 20 years based on the type of construction. Thepavement design manuals provide guidance.

Traffic forecasts are developed during the Project Development and Environmental(PD&E) study of a project. A Traffic Report is generally required. When a PD&E study isnot conducted, traffic forecasts must be prepared during the plans design process.Project traffic used for design must be attested to as shown in Chapter 19of this volume.

The following traffic information should be available to the designer prior to or very earlyin the design process:


Delete the previous sentence and replace with the following:

See RFP for the following traffic information:

1. AADT for the current year, opening year (completion of construction) and design year.

2. Existing hourly traffic volumes over minimum of 24-hour period, including peakhour turning movements and pedestrian counts.

3. Directional distribution factor (D).

4. Standard K factor (K).

5. Truck factors (T) for daily and peak hour.

6. Design speed and proposed posted speed.

7. Design vehicle for geometric design.

8. Turning movements and diagrams for existing and proposed signalizedintersections.

9. Special or unique traffic conditions, including during construction.

10. Crash history, including analyses at high crash locations within the project limits.

11. Recommendations regarding parking or other traffic restrictions.

Design Controls 1-2


25/914


1.3 Capacity and Level of Service

The AASHTO publicationA Pol icy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets andthe Transportation Research Board Highway Capacity Manual provide the detailedanalysis and calculation guides necessary for the number and configurations of lanesrequired and the resulting levels of service provided. As illustrated in those texts,gradients, roadside developments, number, spacing and types of crossings andintersections, traffic volumes, and signalization patterns all greatly influence capacity andlevel of service. Those factors, in addition to the roadway functional classification, have adirect influence on the design speed to be adopted at the preliminary design level.

Design of signalized intersections should ensure an adequate Level of Service through

the design year of the facility, especially when right of way acquisition is beingconsidered. The capacity of an at-grade arterial or collector is primarily controlled by itsability to move traffic through signalized intersections, rather than the mid-block throughlane capacity.

The operational analysis methods in the Highway Capacity Manualshall be used fordesign of signalized intersections. The designer must provide information or assumptionson basic intersection geometrics, lane utilization, movement-specific traffic volumes, etc.The primary output of the operational analysis method is Level of Service and delay at asignalized intersection; however, this method can be used to determine geometricrequirements, signal timing or service flow volumes.

It is emphasized that signal timing is interactive with geometric design. That is, changesto geometrics, such as adding a turn lane, must consider changes to the signal timingsimultaneously. Department approved software, including the Highway CapacitySoftware, should be used to simulate the operation of independent or interconnectedsignals. Output from these programs can be used for the analysis and evaluation ofproposed designs.

Design Controls 1-3


26/914


1.4 Roadway Functional and System Classification

The AASHTO publication A Pol icy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets,5th Edition (2004) presents an excellent discussion on highway functionalclassifications. Florida Statutes, Title XXVI, Chapters 334, 335and 336give similardefinitions, and establish classifications for road design in the State of Florida.

The Systems Planning Office, in compliance with Rule Chapter 14-97and the FloridaStatutes, has developed a comprehensive Access Management Classification systemfor all segments of the State Highway System. The purpose is to enhance thefunctional integrity of the State Highway System, protect public safety and provideimproved mobility of goods and people.

Functional and Access Management classification and the standards required by themare predetermined controls over which the designer has little choice.

1.5 RRR Design

Design criteria applicable for the State Highway System facilities are contained inChapter 25 of this volume, Floridas Design Criteria for Resurfacing, Restorationand Rehabilitation (RRR) of Streets and Highways.

Design Controls 1-4


27/914


1.6 Design Consistency and Driver Expectancy

Design consistency is achieved when the geometric features of the roadway areconsistent with the operational characteristics expected by the driver. Inconsistenciesnormally relate to:

1. Changes in design speed.

2. Changes in cross section.

3. Incompatibility in geometry and operational requirements.

Changes in design speed may occur on a given stretch of roadway because portions ofthe highway were built as separate projects over an extended period of time.

Inconsistencies may be due to a number of factors: changes in standards or FDOTpolicy, reclassification of the facility, and lack of necessary funding.

There are two major types of design inconsistencies relative to cross section. Theseare point inconsistencies and a general incompatibility between cross section andalignment. A point inconsistency may be, for example, the narrowing of lane widths, anarrow bridge, a lane drop, or a change from multilane section to two lanes.

A cross sectional inconsistency is usually the result of upgrading a highway crosssection without upgrading the alignment. Sometimes pavements are widened and

shoulders added on an older two lane highway. The wider cross section on an oldalignment might convey a conflicting message to the driver and lead to an inappropriateexpectancy based on the visual aspects of the cross section, because cross sectionfeatures can be more apparent than the alignment.

Widening alone can measurably improve the safety characteristics of a road, particularlyon very narrow, low-volume roads. Designers should, however, be aware of potentialinconsistencies that frequently can be overcome with relatively low cost treatments. Inthe case of widened roads on old alignments, pavement markings, warning signs, anddelineation devices can be very helpful to the driver.

Inconsistencies may also relate to incompatibility in geometric and operationalrequirements. Occasionally elements of the design appear to have been selected forthe purpose of fitting together the geometric components conveniently andeconomically rather than for the purpose of satisfying operational requirements. Anexample of an inconsistency resulting from the incompatibility is a direct entry ramp thatis intended to permit vehicles to enter the stream of traffic without coming to a complete

Design Controls 1-5


28/914


stop but which, in reality, forces the vehicle to stop when a gap in the traffic stream isnot immediately available.

Design inconsistencies can result in driver uncertainty, an increase in response timeand an increase in the probability of inappropriate driver response.

Driver expectancy relates to the readiness of the driver to respond to events, situations,or the presentation of information. It can be defined as an inclination, based onprevious experience, to respond in a set manner to a roadway or traffic situation. Itshould be stressed that the initial response is to the expected situation rather than theactual one.

Expectancy can affect the perception and use of information. In most circumstances, theexpected and actual conditions are the same. However, when design inconsistenciesoccur and a driver's expectancy is incorrect, it takes longer to respond properly, theremay be no response, or the response may be inappropriate to actual conditions.

There are certain elements in the design of various components of the roadway thatparticularly affect design consistency, driver expectancy, and vehicular operation.These components include horizontal and vertical alignment, embankments and slopes,shoulders, crown and cross slope, superelevation, bridge widths, signing anddelineation, guardrail and placement of utility poles or light supports.

Design Controls 1-6


29/914


1.7 Transportation Design for Livable Communities

(TDLC)

1.7.1 Policy Statement

Designs should consider the incorporation of TDLC features on the State HighwaySystem when such features are desired, appropriate and feasible.

The incorporation of such features is a shared responsibility between the Department andlocal government. Design criteria for TDLC projects are in Chapter 21 of this volume.

1.7.2 Aesthetics

Highways are built first and foremost for functional purposes, but the designer should besensitive to how the highway will be perceived by the users. Designing aesthetictreatments is more than just providing for landscape plantings. The roadway shouldblend into the landscape, avoiding large cuts and fills, and round side slopes into theexisting terrain. Horizontal and vertical alignment should be coordinated so that a driverhas an opportunity to gain a sense of the local environment. Combinations of horizontaland crest vertical curves, and broken-back curves should be avoided. Excessively longtangent sections become monotonous. Either curvature or other features should be

added to maintain drivers interest.

Application of the clear zone concept discussed in the chapter on Roadside Safety willresult in a clean, uncluttered and pleasing roadside. Landscaping of the roadsideshould be considered early in the design process, so that plantings blend in with thegeometric design. Chapter 9 of this volume discusses landscape design criteria. Attimes extra right of way may be obtained for treatments if the need is identified early.Retention/detention ponds and other wetlands can be attractive if well designed andplaced in a location where they can be viewed from the roadway.

Community Aesthetic Features placed in the right of way to represent the community

are discussed in Section 9.3of this volume.

Vistas of exceptional beauty should be accentuated by the roadway geometrics.Ideally, such vistas should be on the outside of horizontal curves, without excessiveroadside appurtenances and signs to clutter the view.

Design Controls 1-7


30/914


"Streetscaping" techniques in urban areas include an emphasis on pedestrianaccommodation, trees and other plantings, access control, careful signing, and zoning

restrictions on commercial signs. Parkways and other roads specifically intended forpleasing aesthetics should be designed by a multidisciplinary team including landscapearchitects and planners.

Aesthetics and roadway design considerations and methods are discussed in the ProjectDevelopment and Environment Manual (Topic No. 650-000-001), Part 2, Chapter 15.

Design Controls 1-8


31/914


1.8 Access Management

Unregulated access to the State Highway System was determined to be one of thecontributing factors to congestion and functional deterioration of the system. Regulationof access was necessary to preserve the functional integrity of the State Highway Systemand to promote the safe and efficient movement of people and goods within the state.Under F.S. 335.18, the Legislature authorized the Department to develop rules toadminister the "State Highway System Access Management Act". These are Rule 14-96and 14-97. In addition, the Department has adopted the Median Opening and AccessManagement Decision Process (Topic No. 625-010-021), which further defines theprinciples and processes for the Department to implement the Access ManagementStatute and Rules.

Each district has established an Access Management Review Committee to guideactions in access management and median decisions through all the Departmentsprocesses, and has assigned various offices the responsibility to permit connectionsand administer other parts of the program. In order to adhere to the program, thedesigner must be familiar with the statute, the rules, adopted procedures and directives,and the district program. In addition to driveway connections, features such as medianopenings affect safe and efficient operation. It is critical that the designer know whataccess classification has been assigned to the highway segment under design and todetermine what roadway features and access connection modifications are appropriateto adhere to the program.

During the PD&E phase, a conceptual access management plan is prepared for thepreferred alternative. Access management issues are also addressed in the PreliminaryEngineering (P.E.) Report. The designer should review these documents and the existingaccess management classification for information on access management decisionsmade during the PD&E process.

During the development of construction plans, the designer should evaluate the accessconnections within the project limits. Driveways and median openings should beconsidered in the analysis of safety and operational problems. Modifications or closuresto access may be the solution in certain cases. Rule 14-97.003(3)(b)gives the

Department the authority to alter, relocate or replace connections in order to meetcurrent Department standards. Furthermore, Rule 14-96.011 allows the FDOT torevoke a permit "if the connection causes a safety or operational problem on the StateHighway System substantiated by an engineering study".

Design Controls 1-9


32/914


Rule 14-97also provides guidance on the treatment of existing features in the highwayimprovement process:

14-97.003(3)(b)

(b) Existing lawful connections, median openings, and signals are not required tomeet the access management standards. Existing access management featureswill generally be allowed to remain in place, but shall be brought intoconformance with access management standards when significant changeoccurs or as changes to the roadway design allow.

In some cases where revisions are necessary due to operational or safety problems, itmay not be possible to totally upgrade a median opening or connection to the neweststandards because of existing conditions or constraints. In these cases, the designer

should provide the best solution, based on good engineering practice. Early identificationof access and median opening location in relation to individual parcels should becompleted before the right of way phase. Median Opening and Access ManagementDecision Process (Topic No. 625-010-021)requires the following:

1. Any significant change to driveway access will be shown in plans or the driveway willbe replaced in the same location, width and configuration (number of lanes).

2. Access design and impacts to a right of way acquisition parcel should be determinedprior to the right of way phase.

3. Changes to access details or decisions must be coordinated with District Right ofWay and General Counsels offices in addition to the Access Management

Review Committee.

Every owner of property that abuts a road on the State Highway System has a right toreasonable access to the abutting state highway but does not have a right tounregulated access to such highway. A means of reasonable access cannot be deniedexcept on the basis of safety and operational concerns as provided in Section 335.184,Florida Statutes. Nothing in Section 335.184 limits the Department's authority torestrict the operational characteristics of a particular means of access. Service roadsprovide reasonable access.

It should be noted that if there are any conflicts between these guidelines and the statute and

rules, the statute and rules shall govern.


See RFP for special requirements.

Design Controls 1-10


33/914


FLORIDA DOT ACCESS MANAGEMENT GUIDELINES RULE 14-97

Table 1.8.1 Freeway Interchange Spacing

AccessClass Area Type Segment Location

InterchangeSpacing(miles)

1Area Type 1 CBD & CBD Fringe For Cities In Urbanized

Areas1.0

Area Type 2 Existing Urbanized Areas Other Than AreaType 1

2.0

Area Type 3 Transitioning Urbanized Areas And UrbanAreas Other Than Area Type 1 or 2

3.0

Area Type 4 Rural Areas 6.0

Table 1.8.2 Arterial Access Management Classifications & Standards

Access

Class

Medians"Restrictive"

physically prevent

vehicle crossing."Non-Restrictive"

allow turns across atany point.

ConnectionSpacing

(feet)

Median OpeningSpacing

(feet)Signal

Spacing

(feet)

>45mph

45mph

Directional Full

2 Restrictive withService Roads

1320 660 1320 2640 2640

3 Restrictive 660 440 1320 2640 2640

4 Non-Restrictive 660 440 2640

5 Restrictive 440 245 660*2640/1320

*2640/1320

6 Non-Restrictive 440 245 1320

7 Both Median Types 125 330 660 1320

* 2640 feet for >45 mph; 1320 feet for 45 mph



34/914


Table 1.8.3 Interim Access Management Standards

Posted Speed(mph)

ConnectionSpacing

(feet)

Median OpeningSpacing

(feet)

SignalSpacing

(feet)

Directional Full

35 mph or less 245 660 1320 1320

36 - 45 mph 440 660 1320 1320

Over 45 mph 660 1320 2640 1320



35/914


1.9 Design Speed

Design speed is a principal design control that regulates the selection of many of theproject standards and criteria used to design a roadway project. The selection of anappropriate design speed must consider many factors. The AASHTO publication,

A Pol icy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets , has a thorough discussionon design speed and these factors.

1.9.1 Design Speed Coordination and Approvals

As a principal design control, design speed must be selected very early in the designprocess and must be documented in the project design file. The Engineer of Recordmust coordinate with the District Design Engineer (DDE), the District Traffic OperationsEngineer (DTOE), and the responsible PD&E engineer to discuss the anticipated postedspeed. Every effort should be made to use as high a design speed as practical toattain a desired degree of safety, mobility and efficiency. However, the design speedshall not be less than the projects proposed posted speed (existing posted speed if nochange is proposed) or legal speed limit. On new construction and reconstructionprojects, designers shall not include in their plans a posted speed higher than thedesign speed.

The selected design speed shall be jointly approved by the District Design Engineer and

the District Traffic Operations Engineer. This includes joint approval that the expectedposted speed will not exceed the selected design speed. This is to be documented onthe Typical Section Package as described in Section 16.2.3. When agreementbetween the DDE and DTOE on the Design Speed cannot be reached, the DDE andDTOE will forward the matter to the District Director of Transportation Development andDistrict Director of Transportation Operations for final resolution. Note that in somecases it may be appropriate to select a higher design speed to match an expectedposted speed and process Design Exceptions or Design Variations for those designelements that do not meet the criteria for the higher speed.

The modification of posted speed limits after the construction of a project has been

completed is a decision made under the authority of the District Traffic OperationsEngineer (FDOT Procedure No. 750-010-011). This is based on the 85th percentilespeed determined through engineering and traffic investigations described in SpeedZoning for Highways, Roads and Streets in Florida, (FDOT Procedure No. 750-010-002). The DTOE typically conducts a speed investigation within one year after anew construction or reconstruction project is completed. When it is determined from this



36/914


speed study that a posted speed higher than the original design speed is warranted, theDTOE working with the DDE must process Design Exceptions or Design Variations for those

design elements that do not meet the criteria for the higher speed. When agreementbetween the DDE and DTOE cannot be reached, the DDE and DTOE will forward the matterto the District Director of Transportation Development and District Director of TransportationOperations for final resolution. Further explanation on how posted speed limits aredeveloped can also be found on the State Traffic Operations web page:

http://www.dot.state.fl.us/trafficoperations/FAQs/SpeedLimitFAQ.shtm

While the selected design speed will establish minimum geometric requirements (e.g.,minimum horizontal curve radius and sight distance), this does not preclude the use ofimproved geometry (flatter curves or greater sight distances) where such improvements can

be provided as a part of economic design. The Engineer of Record is required to document,in a design speed matrix, any design features that were designed to speeds other than theproject design speed. Increments of 5 mph should be used when selecting design speeds.

Table 1.9.1provides a recommended range of design speeds for new construction andreconstruction projects on the State Highway System except for facilities on theStrategic Intermodal System (SIS). Design Speed for facilities on the SIS (including SISHighway Corridors, Emerging SIS Highway Corridors, SIS Highway IntermodalConnectors and Emerging SIS Highway Intermodal Connectors) shall meet or exceedthe values in Table 1.9.2.

For design speed on RRR projects on the State Highway System, see Chapter 25 ofthis volume. Chapter 25 may be used for RRR projects on the SIS. However, theminimum design speed in Table 1.9.2should be used when practicable, consistent withproposed improvements defined for the facility in the Corridor Management Plan.

Table 1.9.1 Design SpeedState Highway System - Non-SIS Facilities

Facility Design Speed (mph)

FreewaysRural 70

Urban 50 - 70

Arterials Rural 55 - 70Urban 40 - 60

CollectorsRural 55 - 65

Urban 35 - 50

TDLC 30 - 40

http://www.dot.state.fl.us/trafficoperations/FAQs/SpeedLimitFAQ.shtmhttp://www.dot.state.fl.us/trafficoperations/FAQs/SpeedLimitFAQ.shtmhttp://www.dot.state.fl.us/trafficoperations/FAQs/SpeedLimitFAQ.shtm


37/914


Table 1.9.2 Minimum Design Speed SIS

Facility Minimum Design Speed (mph)

Interstateand

Freeways

Rural and Urban* 70

Urbanized* 60

ArterialsRural* 65

Urban andUrbanized*

50**

* Terms based on definitions contained in SIS Procedure (Topic No. 525-030-260).

** For curb and gutter facilities where existing posted speed is 45mph or less and AccessManagement Class 3 is proposed, a design speed of 45mph may be used.

Note: For SIS facilities (including SIS Highway Corridors and Emerging SIS Highway Corridors), designspeeds less than the above minimums shall be submitted to the Director, Office of Design andapproved by the Chief Engineer, following a review by the State Transportation DevelopmentAdministrator, in accordance with the SIS Procedure (Topic No. 525-030-260).

For SIS and Emerging SIS Highway Intermodal Connectors not on the State HighwaySystem, design speeds less than the above outlined minimums shall be approved by theDistrict Design Engineer, following a review by the District Planning (Intermodal SystemsDevelopment) Manager in accordance with the SIS Highway Component Standards &

Criteria(Topic No. 525-030-260). Refer to Chapter 2 of this Volume for design criteria.


Delete PPM1.9 and see RFP for design speed.



38/914


1.10 Public Involvement

It is the policy (Topic No. 000-525-050, Public Involvement Opportunities)of the FDOT topromote public involvement opportunities and information exchange activities in all functionalareas using various techniques adapted to local area conditions and project requirements.

Typically, when a project reaches the design phase, many of the project commitmentsand community issues have already been identified. However, this is not always true.Design alternatives still need to be reevaluated to determine their implications in relationto community impacts. Any commitments made in previous phases would becommunicated to designers, who will be responsible for carrying them out. Ifconstraints arise that require design changes which affect the Departments ability to

meet commitments, then the process would require follow-up with the affectedcommunity. In such cases, additional public involvement and community impactassessment may be necessary to address public concerns.

Projects may have potential community impacts that are not identified until the design phase,such as, but not limited to:

1. Impacts on public safety, including people with disabilities

2. School crossings or other areas of high pedestrian activity

3. Aesthetic features such as landscaping or tree replacement

4. Medians or access changes5. Intersections and driveways

6. Audible signalized intersections

7. Accessibility of corridor businesses and neighborhoods

8. Wider sidewalks or improved bicycle facilities

9. Lighting

10. Transit

11. Transportation Design for Livable Communities

12. Maintenance of Traffic

13. Railroad crossings

14. Location and extent of storm water management facilities



39/914


Each district has developed Community Awareness Plan (CAP) guidelines to beimplemented on all design projects for continued efforts in public involvement depending on

the level of impact to the community.


See RFP for commitments and special CAP requirements.



40/914


1.11 Context Sensitive Solutions in Design

In order to plan, design, construct, maintain and operate the State TransportationSystem, Context Sensitive Solutions should be considered in all projects, not onlyTDLC projects. This design philosophy seeks transportation solutions that improvemobility and safety while complementing and enhancing community values andobjectives. Context sensitive solutions are reached through joint effort involvingall stakeholders.

It is recognized that the Department is expected to provide mobility and a quality of lifethat includes the protection of the natural resources and the cultural and social values oftheir community, issues such as funding, maintenance, traffic demand, impact on

alternate routes, impact on safety and laws, and rules and regulations must beaddressed early with key stakeholders.

Context sensitive solutions can be achieved without necessarily reducing criteria. Theability to develop a context sensitive solution requires an understanding of theoperational effects of highway geometry. Designers have the challenging task ofcombining community desires with good highway design practice (design criteria andguidelines) to produce workable, acceptable solutions.


See RFP for special requirements.



41/914



1.12 Design Vehicle

One of the primary design controls for geometric highway design is based on thephysical characteristics of vehicles that will utilize the facility. The controlling vehicle fordesign is called the design vehicle. AASHTOs A Policy on Geometric Design ofHighways and Streets provides some general guidance on the selection of a designvehicle. AASHTOalso provides the dimensions and turning characteristics for a varietyof standard design vehicles (P, SU, WB-40, WB-62, etc.).

Studies have shown that the WB-50 is no longer a majority in the truck population onFloridas highways. The Florida Statutes allow truck-trailer combinations that aresimilar to the AASHTO WB-62 Interstate Semitrailer with some slight modifications.

This modified WB-62 design vehicle used in Florida is defined here as the FloridaInterstate Semitrailer (WB-62FL). The WB-62FL is more representative of the truckpopulation on Floridas highways than the WB-50. Therefore, the WB-62FL designvehicle should now be used in situations that previously called for a WB-50. In addition,the Floridas Turnpike and other truck routes allow tandem tractor trailers, so the

AASHTO WB-109D should be used as the design vehicle for tandem truck routes.

When designing for a WB-62FL at intersections, the design elements (control radii,return radii, etc.) can be based on the criteria tables and figures in AASHTO for aWB-62. In addition, when designing features for complex or constrained intersections(roundabouts, multi-lane turns, directional median openings, ramps, etc.) the geometric

design elements should be checked against the turning movement of a WB-62FL. TheWB-62FL is described in Figure 1.12.1.

Figure 1.12.1 Florida Interstate Semitrailer (WB-62FL)


42/914



See RFP for design vehicle requirements.



43/914

Topic #625-000-007 January 1, 2013Plans Preparation Manual, Volume 1 - English Revised January 1, 2015

Chapter 2

Design Geometrics and Criteria

2.0 General ...................................................................................... 2-1

2.0.1 Railroad-Highway Grade Crossing Near or WithinProject Limits ............................................................. 2-3

2.1 Lanes ......................................................................................... 2-8

2.1.1 Travel Lanes and Auxiliary Lanes............................... 2-8

2.1.2 Other Lane Widths ..................................................... 2-9

2.1.3 Ramp Traveled Way Widths ..................................... 2-10

2.1.4 Pedestrian, Bicycle and Public Transit Facilities ....... 2-10

2.1.4.1 Pedestrian Facilities ................................. 2-10

2.1.4.2 Bicycle Facilities ....................................... 2-11

2.1.4.3 Public Transit Facilities ............................. 2-11

2.1.5 Cross Slopes ............................................................ 2-12

2.1.5.1 Hydroplaning Analysis .............................. 2-13

2.1.6 Roadway Pavement ................................................. 2-16

2.1.6.1 Alternative Roadway PavingTreatments ............................................... 2-16

2.1.6.2 Maintenance Memorandum ofAgreement Requirements forPatterned Pavement ................................. 2-18

2.1.7 Transitions of Pavement Widths ............................... 2-20

2.1.8 Number of Lanes on the State Highway System ...... 2-20

2.2 Medians ................................................................................... 2-21

2.2.1 Median Width for Roadways ..................................... 2-21

2.2.2 Multilane Facility Median Policy ................................ 2-22

2.2.3 Median Treatments on Bridges ................................ 2-22

Design Geometrics and Criteria 2-i


44/914


2.3 Shoulders ................................................................................. 2-23

2.3.1 Limits of Friction Course on Paved Shoulders .......... 2-31

2.3.2 Shoulder Warning Devices (Rumble Strips) ............. 2-31

2.3.3 Use of Curb on High Speed Roadways .................... 2-32

2.4 Roadside Slopes ...................................................................... 2-33

2.5 Borders .................................................................................... 2-35

2.5.1 Limited Access Facilities .......................................... 2-38

2.6 Grades ..................................................................................... 2-39

2.7 Sight Distance .......................................................................... 2-42

2.8 Curves ..................................................................................... 2-45

2.8.1 Horizontal Curves ..................................................... 2-45

2.8.1.1 Supplemental Alignment Control(Mainline) ................................................. 2-45

2.8.1.2 Supplemental Alignment Control

(Intersections) .......................................... 2-50

2.8.1.3 Roadway Transitions ................................ 2-50

2.8.2 Vertical Curves ......................................................... 2-51

2.9 Superelevation ......................................................................... 2-53

2.10 Vertical Clearance .................................................................... 2-59

2.10.1 Vertical Clearance Over Water ................................. 2-67

2.10.2 Horizontal Waterway Clearance ............................... 2-68

2.10.3 Regulatory Agency Requirements ............................ 2-68

2.10.4 Airspace Obstructions .............................................. 2-69

2.11 Lateral Offset ........................................................................... 2-71

Design Geometrics and Criteria 2-ii


45/914


2.12 Bridge Railings and Separators ................................................ 2-80

2.13 Intersections ............................................................................. 2-93

2.13.1 Roundabouts ............................................................ 2-93

2.13.2 Queue Length for Unsignalized Intersections ........... 2-93

2.13.3 Offset Left Turn Lanes .............................................. 2-94

2.14 Interchanges and Median Openings/Crossovers ...................... 2-96

2.14.1 Limited Access Right of Way Limits atInterchanges ............................................................ 2-96

2.14.2

Median Openings at Interchanges ............................ 2-97

2.14.3 Ramp Widths ............................................................ 2-97

2.14.4 Crossovers on Limited Access Facilities .................. 2-99

2.15 Lighting Criteria ...................................................................... 2-105

2.16 High-Speed Urban and Suburban Arterial Highways .............. 2-105

2.16.1 Design Speed ......................................................... 2-107

2.16.2 Curbs ..................................................................... 2-107

2.16.3 Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities ............................ 2-1072.16.4 Medians ................................................................. 2-107

2.16.5 Shoulders ............................................................... 2-108

2.16.6 Friction Course ....................................................... 2-108

2.16.7 Border Width .......................................................... 2-108

2.16.8 Grades ................................................................... 2-108

2.16.9 Horizontal Curves ................................................... 2-109

2.16.10 Superelevation ....................................................... 2-109

2.16.11 Lateral Offset .......................................................... 2-110

Design Geometrics and Criteria 2-iii


46/914


Tables

Table 2.1.1 Lane Widths ............................................................... 2-8

Table 2.1.2 Lane Widths - Special ................................................ 2-9

Table 2.1.3 Ramp Widths ............................................................ 2-10

Table 2.1.4 Maximum Algebraic Difference in Cross Slope atTurning Roadway Terminals ..................................... 2-15

Table 2.2.1 Median Widths ......................................................... 2-21

Table 2.3.1 Shoulder Widths and Cross Slopes -Freeways ................................................................. 2-24

Table 2.3.2 Shoulder Widths and Cross Slopes -Arterials Divided ....................................................... 2-25

Table 2.3.3 Shoulder Widths and Cross Slopes -Arterials Undivided ................................................... 2-26

Table 2.3.4 Shoulder Widths and Cross Slopes -Collectors Divided and Undivided ............................. 2-27

Table 2.4.1 Roadside Slopes ...................................................... 2-34

Table 2.5.1 Highways with Flush Shoulders ................................ 2-36

Table 2.5.2 Highways with Curb or Curb and Gutter inUrban Areas ............................................................. 2-37

Table 2.5.3 Limited Access Facilities .......................................... 2-38

Table 2.6.1 Maximum Grades ..................................................... 2-40

Table 2.6.2 Maximum Change in Grade WithoutVertical Curves ......................................................... 2-40

Table 2.6.3 Criteria for Grade Datum .......................................... 2-41

Table 2.6.4 Grade Criteria for Curb and Gutter Sections ............. 2-41

Table 2.7.1 Minimum Stopping Sight Distance ............................ 2-43

Table 2.7.2 Minimum Passing Sight Distance ............................. 2-44

Table 2.8.1a Maximum Deflections without Horizontal Curves ...... 2-47

Design Geometrics and Criteria 2-iv


47/914


Table 2.8.1b Maximum Deflection for Through Lanesthrough Intersections ................................................ 2-47

Table 2.8.2a Length of Horizontal Curves ..................................... 2-48

Table 2.8.2b Arc Length (in feet) of Compound Curves withOne-Half/Double Radii - Turning Roadways ............. 2-48

Table 2.8.3 Maximum Curvature of Horizontal Curve(Using Limiting Values of "e" and "f") ........................ 2-49

Table 2.8.4 Maximum Horizontal Curvature Using NormalCross Slopes (-0.02) ................................................ 2-49

Table 2.8.5 Minimum Lengths of Crest Vertical Curves

Based on Stopping Sight Distance ........................... 2-51

Table 2.8.6 Minimum Lengths of Sag Vertical CurvesBased on Stopping Sight Distance andHeadlight Sight Distance .......................................... 2-52

Table 2.9.1 Superelevation Rates for Rural Highways,Urban Freeways and High Speed UrbanHighways (e max=0.10) ............................................. 2-54

Table 2.9.2 Superelevation Rates for Urban Highways

and High Speed Urban Streets (emax= 0.05) ............ 2-56

Table 2.9.3 Superelevation Transition Slope Rates forRural Highways, Urban Freeways andHigh Speed Urban Highways ................................... 2-58

Table 2.9.4 Superelevation Transition Slope Rates for UrbanHighways and High Speed Urban Streets ................ 2-58

Table 2.10.1 Minimum Vertical Clearances for New Bridges ......... 2-66

Table 2.10.2 Minimum Vertical Clearances for New Sign

and Signal Structures ............................................... 2-66

Table 2.10.3 FAA Notification Requirements ................................ 2-70

Table 2.11.1 Lateral Offset for Traffic Control Signs ..................... 2-72

Table 2.11.2 Lateral Offset for Light Poles .................................... 2-72

Design Geometrics and Criteria 2-v


48/914


Table 2.11.3 Lateral Offset for Aboveground Fixed Utilities(AFUs) ...................................................................... 2-73

Table 2.11.4 Lateral Offset to Traffic Infraction Detectors,Signal Poles and Controller Cabinets for Signals .... 2-74

Table 2.11.5 Lateral Offset to Trees .............................................. 2-74

Table 2.11.6 Lateral Offset to Bridge Piers and Abutments ........... 2-75

Table 2.11.7 Lateral Offset to Railroad Grade CrossingTraffic Control Devices ............................................. 2-76

Table 2.11.8 Lateral Offset to Canal and Drop-off Hazards ........... 2-76

Table 2.11.9 Lateral Offset to Other Roadside Obstacles ............. 2-76

Table 2.11.10 Lateral Offset for ITS Poles and Related Items ........ 2-77

Table 2.11.11 Recoverable Terrain ................................................. 2-78

Table 2.14.1 Ramp Widths - Turning Roadways ........................... 2-98

Figures

Figure 2.0.1 Partial Bridge Sections * ............................................. 2-4

Figure 2.0.2 Bridge Section * ......................................................... 2-5

Figure 2.0.3 Partial Bridge Sections * ............................................. 2-6

Figure 2.0.4 Bridge Section * ......................................................... 2-7

Figure 2.1.1 Standard Pavement Cross Slopes............................ 2-14

Figure 2.3.1.A Shoulder Superelevation .......................................... 2-28

Figure 2.3.1.B Special Shoulder Superelevation ............................. 2-29

Figure 2.3.2 Typical Paving Under Bridge .................................... 2-30

Figure 2.9.1 Superelevation Rate For Rural Highways,Urban Freeways and High Speed UrbanHighways (e max=0.10) ............................................. 2-55

Figure 2.9.2 Superelevation Rates for Urban Highwaysand High Speed Urban Streets (emax= 0.05) ............ 2-57

Design Geometrics and Criteria 2-vi


49/914


Figure 2.10.1 Clearances Rural and Urban Interstates(Freeways), Arterials and Collectors, with

Projected 20-Year ADT of 1500 or Greater .............. 2-60

Figure 2.10.2 Clearances Rural Arterials and Collectors withProjected 20-Year ADT of Less than 1500 ............... 2-61

Figure 2.10.3 Clearances Urban Arterials and Collectors(Without Curb and Gutter) with Projected20-Year ADT of Less than 1500 ............................... 2-62

Figure 2.10.4.A Clearances Urban Arterials and Collectors(Curb and Gutter) 45 mph Elevation of Bridge .... 2-63

Figure 2.10.4.B Clearances Urban Arterials and Collectors (Curband Gutter) 45 mph Section through Bridge ....... 2-64

Figure 2.10.5 Clearances Urban Arterials and Collectors(Curb and Gutter) with Traffic Barrier ....................... 2-65

Figure 2.11.1 Lateral Offset to Guardrail ........................................ 2-79

Figure 2.12.1 Bridge Traffic Railings "F" Shapes ......................... 2-81

Figure 2.12.2 Bridge Traffic Railings Vertical Shapes.................. 2-82

Figure 2.12.3 Bridge Traffic Railings Other Shapes .................... 2-83

Figure 2.12.4 Bridge Traffic Railings Noise BarrierCombination ............................................................. 2-84

Figure 2.12.5 Bridge Railing and Separators MedianTraffic Railing and Separators .................................. 2-85

Figure 2.12.6 Bridge Fencing for Traffic Railings............................ 2-86

Figure 2.12.7 Bridge Railing Pedestrian / Bicycle Railing ............ 2-87

Figure 2.12.8 Bridge Railing Pedestrian / Bicycle Railing ............ 2-88

Figure 2.12.9 Bridge Railing Pedestrian / Bicycle Railing ............ 2-89Figure 2.12.10 Bridge Railing Pedestrian / Bicycle Retrofit Railing 2-90

Figure 2.12.11 Bridge Fencing for Pedestrian Railing ...................... 2-91

Figure 2.12.12 Enclosed Bridge Fencing for Pedestrian Railing ....... 2-92

Design Geometrics and Criteria 2-vii


50/914


Figure 2.13.1 Typical Opposing Left Turns (22 Median with

Negative 10 Offset) .................................................. 2-94

Figure 2.13.2 Typical Opposing Left Turns (22 Median withNegative 1 Offset).................................................... 2-95

Figure 2.13.3 Left Turn Offset Guidelines....................................... 2-95

Figure 2.14.1 Crossovers on Limited Access Facilities 6 or More Lanes ..................................................... 2-102

Figure 2.14.2 Crossovers on Limited Access Facilities 4 Lanes .................................................................. 2-103

Figure 2.14.3 Median Barrier Opening for Crossovers onLimited Access Facilities ......................................... 2-104

Figure 2.16.1 Four-Lane High-Speed Urban andSuburban Section ................................................... 2-106

Figure 2.16.2 Six-Lane High-Speed Urban andSuburban Section ................................................... 2-106

Figure 2.16.3 Superelevation Rates for High-Speed Urban andSuburban Sections ................................................. 2-109

Design Geometrics and Criteria 2-viii


51/914


Chapter 2

Design Geometrics and Criteria

2.0 General

The implementation of design criteria is outlined in the following text.

1. Design Criteria: The design criteria presented in this manual are intended asthe principal source of criteria for the design of new construction or majorreconstruction projects on the Florida State Highway System.

These criteria are presented by subject for major design elements as fixed values

or a range of acceptable values as defined by qualifiers.

Where design criteria appear in the Design Standards, they will be consistentwith the criteria in this manual. In addition, some criteria will remain in the otherchapters of this manual. When conflicts are discovered, they should be broughtto the attention of the State Roadway Design Engineer or State StructuresDesign Engineer, as applicable, for resolution.


Delete the last sentence of the above paragraph and replace with the following:

Where conflicts exist, the EOR shall select the criteria proven to result in bettersafety performance.

On reconstruction projects, existing project features which were constructed tomeet minimum metric design criteria, but are mathematically slightly less thanequivalent minimum English design criteria, do not require Design Exceptions orDesign Variations to remain.

Design criteria for Resurfacing, Restoration, and Rehabilitation (RRR) are presentedin Chapter 25of this volume and are applicable only on programmed RRR projects.


Delete the sentence above and see RFP for requirements.

Facilities on the Strategic Intermodal System (SIS) are subject to specialstandards and criteria for number of lanes, design speed, access, level of serviceand other requirements.

Design Geometrics and Criteria 2-1


52/914


SIS and Emerging SIS Highway Intermodal Connectors on the State HighwaySystem (SHS) shall be designed in accordance with the SIS criteria contained inthis manual. SIS and Emerging SIS Highway Intermodal Connectors on the local

system (non-SHS) should also be designed in accordance with the SIS criteriacontained in this manual, but the District may allow the use of the Manual ofUniform Minimum Standards for Design, Construction and Maintenance forStreets and Highways(commonly known as the"Florida Greenbook" ), TopicNo. 625-000-015 depending on project specifics, with approval by the DistrictDesign Engineer.


Delete the last sentence of the above paragraph and see RFP for requirements.

Design Criteria for roads that are not part of the State Highway System should beobtained from the Florida Greenbook.


Delete the last sentence.

2. Design Controls: Design controls are characteristics and conditions that influenceor regulate the selection of the criteria for project standards. It is the designer'sresponsibility to recognize and apply those controls applicable to the project.

3. Design Standards: The specific values selected from the design criteriabecome the design standards for a design project. These standards will beidentified and documented by the designer.

4. Project Parameters: The properties or specific conditions with limits whichrequire modification of design standards within these limits. The designer isresponsible for establishing and documenting any project parameters and theirlimits, as part of the justification for deviations from project standards.


Delete the last sentence of the above paragraph.

Many design standard considerations are related directly to the design speed, includingvertical and horizontal geometry and required sight distances. The minimum designvalues are very closely related to traffic safety and cannot be compromised without anapproved Design Exception or Design Variation. See Chapter 23of this volume.

http://www.dot.state.fl.us/rddesign/FloridaGreenbook/FGB.shtmhttp://www.dot.state.fl.us/rddesign/FloridaGreenbook/FGB.shtmhttp://www.dot.state.fl.us/rddesign/FloridaGreenbook/FGB.shtmhttp://www.dot.state.fl.us/rddesign/FloridaGreenbook/FGB.shtm


53/914


Public facilities constructed or funded by FDOT (parking garages, weigh stations,operation centers, park & ride facilities, etc.) shall comply with the criteria in this manual,FDOTDesign Standards, and other applicable Department manuals. Roads not on the

State Highway System which are impacted by the construction of these public facilitiesshould also be designed in accordance with Department criteria and standards, but theDistrict may allow the use of the Florida Greenbook depending on project specifics.


Delete the last sentence of the above paragraph.

Roadway and bridge typical sections developed for projects must reflect the values andproperties outlined in Items 1 - 4 of this section. These typical sections shall include the

location and limits of such features as lanes, medians, shoulders, curbs, sidewalks,barriers, railings, etc.. Section 16.2.3of this volume gives the requirements for approvaland concurrence of typical section packages.

Coordination is of primary importance on projects that contain both roadway and bridgetypical sections. The Roadway and Structures Offices must address the compatibility ofthe typical section features mentioned above, and provide for an integrated design andreview process for the project.

Example roadway typical sections are included in the exhibits in Volume 2, Chapter 6.Partial bridge sections, Figures 2.0.1 - 2.0.4, provide criteria regarding lanes, medians,

and shoulders for various facilities. Subsequent sections of this chapter contain specificinformation and criteria regarding these and other typical section elements, as well asgeometric features of both roadways and bridges.

2.0.1 Railroad-Highway Grade Crossing Near or WithinProject Limits

Federal-aid projects must be reviewed to determine if a railroad-highway grade crossingis in or near the limits of the project. If such railroad-highway grade crossing exists, theproject must be upgraded in accordance withSection 6.2.3.



54/914



Figure 2.0.1 Partial Bridge Sections *


55/914



Figure 2.0.2 Bridge Section *


56/914



Figure 2.0.3 Partial Bridge Sections *


57/914



Figure 2.0.4 Bridge Section *


58/914


2.1 Lanes

Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) criteria for lane widths and pavementslopes are given by highway type and area, through lanes, auxiliary lanes and otherspecial lanes.

2.1.1 Travel Lanes and Auxiliary Lanes

Standard practice is to provide lane widths that are consistent with AASHTOGuidelines. See Table 2.1.1. Auxiliary lanes for speed change, turning and storage,and other purposes supplementary to through-traffic movement should be of thesame width