PPC051209 RESOLUTION NO. 09-69 · 2009. 6. 9. · ppc051209 resolution no. 09-69 h:\resolutions\2009res\r09-69 prop k sfcta upp match.doc page 1 of 4 resolution appropriating $77,890

$Page 1: PPC051209 RESOLUTION NO. 09-69 · 2009. 6. 9. · ppc051209 resolution no. 09-69 h:\resolutions\2009res\r09-69 prop k sfcta upp match.doc page 1 of 4 resolution appropriating $77,890$
PPC051209 RESOLUTION NO. 09-69

H:\Resolutions\2009RES\R09-69 Prop K SFCTA UPP Match.doc Page 1 of 4

RESOLUTION APPROPRIATING $77,890 IN PROP K FUNDS FOR THE URBAN

PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM PRE-IMPLEMENTATION PROJECT, SUBJECT TO THE

ATTACHED FISCAL YEAR CASH FLOW DISTRIBUTION SCHEDULE, AND AMENDING

THE RELEVANT 5-YEAR PRIORITIZATION PROGRAM

WHEREAS, The Prop K Expenditure Plan Transportation Demand Management and

Parking Management category provides Prop K funds for transportation demand management and

to support projects that can lead to reduction of single-occupant vehicle dependence; and

WHEREAS, In 2008, the U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) awarded $87

million to multiple agencies in the San Francisco Bay Area to implement a package of congestion

management projects under its Urban Partnership Program (UPP); and

WHEREAS, Through the UPP, the USDOT initially provided a $1.6 million grant to the

Authority for Doyle Drive tolling analysis and other pre-implementation activities; and

WHEREAS, On May 20, 2008, through Resolution 08-74, the Authority appropriated

$299,240 in Prop K funds to match the federal pre-implementation grant from the Prop K

Expenditure Plan Doyle Drive category; and

WHEREAS, In December 2008, following discussions with regional partners and the

USDOT, the Authority’s pre-implementation grant was reduced to $600,000 and the scope revised

to include a specify a program-wide UPP evaluation and further work on San Francisco’s area-wide

congestion pricing feasibility study, and to no longer include the study of tolling on Doyle Drive;

and

WHEREAS, In May 2009, Authority staff administratively de-obligated the unspent balance

of the prior pre-implementation Prop K appropriation ($262,405), making those funds available for



future appropriation to the Doyle Drive project; and

WHEREAS, Authority staff has requested appropriation of $77,890 in Prop K funds from

the Transportation Demand Management and Parking Management category to, when combined

with $24,110 in state Planning, Programming, and Monitoring funds, meet the local match

requirement for the revised scope of the UPP Pre-Implementation Project; and

WHEREAS, The 5-Year Prioritization Program (5YPP) for the aforementioned Prop K

category includes a line item for the Authority to perform parking assessment studies, which is no

longer needed because of the Municipal Transportation Agency’s SFpark project; and

WHEREAS, The requested action requires an amendment to the relevant 5YPP to

reprogram $70,000 in Fiscal Year 2007/08 funds and $7,890 in Fiscal Year 2008/09 funds from the

Parking Assessment Studies Project to the UPP Pre-Implementation Project in Fiscal Year 2008/09;

and

WHEREAS, There are sufficient funds in the Capital Expenditures line item of the

Authority’s adopted Fiscal Year 2008/09 budget to cover the proposed action; and

WHEREAS, At its April 22, 2009 meeting, the Citizens Advisory Committee was briefed on

the subject request and unanimously adopted a motion of support for the staff recommendation;

and

WHEREAS, At its May 12, 2009 meeting, the Plans and Programs Committee reviewed the

subject request and unanimously recommended approval of the staff recommendation; now,

therefore, be it

RESOLVED, That the Authority hereby amends the Transportation Demand and Parking

Management 5YPP to reprogram $70,000 in Fiscal Year 2007/08 funds and $7,890 in Fiscal Year

2008/09 funds from the Parking Assessment Studies Project to the UPP Pre-Implementation



Project in Fiscal Year 2008/09; and be it further

RESOLVED, That the Authority hereby appropriates $77,890 in Fiscal Year 2008/09 Prop

K funds for the UPP Pre-Implementation Project; and be it further

RESOLVED, That the Authority finds the appropriation of these funds to be in

conformance with the priorities, funding levels, and prioritization methodologies established in the

Prop K Expenditure Plan, the 2005 Prop K Strategic Plan, and amended 5YPP; and be it further

RESOLVED, That the Authority hereby authorizes the actual expenditure (cash

reimbursement) of funds for these activities to take place subject to the Fiscal Year Cash Flow

Distribution Schedule detailed in the attached Allocation Request Form; and be it further

RESOLVED, That the Capital Improvement Program of the Congestion Management

Program (CMP) and the 2005 Strategic Plan are hereby amended, as appropriate.

Attachments:

1. Allocation Request Form 2. Prop K Capital Budget 3. Prop K Fiscal Year Cash Flow Distribution – Summary Table


San Francisco County Transportation AuthorityProposition K Sales Tax Program Allocation Request Form

FY of Allocation Action: 2008/09

Project Name:

Implementing Agency:

EXPENDITURE PLAN INFORMATION

Category:

Subcategory:

EP Project/Program:

EP Line Number (Primary): 43 Current Request:Other EP Line Numbers:

Urban Partnership Program Pre-Implementation - Local Match

SCOPE

San Francisco County Transportation Authority

D. TSM/Strategic Initiatives

i. TDM/Parking Management

a. Transportation Demand Management/Parking Management

$77,890

Please see attached Word document.

Gray cells will automatically be filled in.

Sufficient scope detail should be provided to allow Authority staff to evaluate the reasonablenes of the proposed budget and schedule. If there are prior allocations for the same project, provide an update on progress. Long scopes may be provided in a separate Word file. Maps, drawings, etc. should be provided on Worksheet 7-Maps.or by inserting additional worksheets.

Project sponsors shall provide a brief explanation of how the project was priortized for funding, highlighting: 1) project benefits, 2) level of public input into the prioritization process, and 3) whether the project is included in any adopted plans, including Prop K 5-Year Prioritization Program (5YPPs). Justify any inconsistencies with the adopted Prop K Strategic Plan and/or relevant 5YPPs.

Indicate whether work is to be performed by outside consultants and/or by force account.

P:\Prop K\FY0809\ARF Pending\SFCTA UPP Pre Imp, 1-Scope Form v. 0809 Page 1 of 11

1 of 4

San Francisco Urban Partnership Program (SF UPP) Program Evaluation and Pre-Implementation Grant for Area-Wide Pricing Scope of Work April 15, 2009 Introduction The US Department of Transportation (USDOT) has awarded approximately $87 million to multiple agencies in the San Francisco Bay Area to implement a package of congestion management projects under its Urban Partnership Program (UPP). The list of projects includes: contributions to the Doyle Drive Replacement Project, downtown San Francisco parking and pricing facilities, information initiatives support for San Francisco area-wide pricing, improvements to ferry services, improvements to travel forecasting, 511 system upgrades, parking payment upgrades, a Vehicle Infrastructure Integration (VII) testbed; and an evaluation of the parking pricing and traveler information systems. Among these funds, USDOT has provided a grant to the San Francisco County Transportation Authority (the Authority) to participate in the SF UPP evaluation and support further work on San Francisco’s area-wide congestion pricing feasibility study. Scope of Work The work to be funded by this grant is divided into the following tasks, described in more detail in the sections that follow:

Task 1: Support and participation in SF UPP evaluation and Transportation Demand Management (TDM) component development

Task 2: Area-wide pricing feasibility studies Task 1: Participation in SF UPP Evaluation and TDM development The Authority will participate in the USDOT-led National Evaluation of the UPP sites. Participation in the evaluation process will entail attendance at conference calls and meetings to advise the USDOT Evaluation Team on relevant performance metrics, available data, and other technical issues as needed or requested to complete the SF UPP Evaluation. The Evaluation Team has identified questions and hypotheses that will be answered and tested in the Evaluation, including those related to congestion and TDM. The Authority will provide input for further refinement of the questions and hypotheses and the specific metrics to be used, as well as the analysis methodologies for the Test Plans that the Evaluation Team will develop. Finally, the Authority will provide data to support specific portions of the evaluation. Participation is expected at a level of preparation and attendance of one meeting per month for the duration of the UPP implementation period, ending in December 2010. Approximately ¾ of the effort for this task is expected to be expended on work relating to the SF UPP Evaluation.

2 of 4

The Authority is also responsible for developing efforts to expand TDM activities as part of the SF UPP. There are no federal funds available for TDM implementation, but there is an opportunity to position the region’s current, locally funded TDM activities to work in conjunction with other projects of the SF UPP, including SFpark and the 511 technology projects. Two specific linkages the Authority will work to make with these other SF UPP projects include:

1. Bikesharing. San Francisco is currently working on two efforts: a pilot bikesharing effort to be implemented in the Summer/Fall 2009, and a bikesharing planning effort for which San Francisco is pursuing State funding. These efforts could be coordinated with SFpark in terms of the locations where bikesharing is provided, providing an opportunity for synergies between better parking policies and a new alternative-mode travel option.

2. TDM outreach. San Francisco conducts outreach to employers on a regular basis to

educate them on potential TDM features they could offer. These efforts could be coordinated with the SF UPP’s 511 technology enhancements that will improve information availability for commuters seeking alternative modes.

In this task, the Authority will provide the necessary support and coordination to make connections between the above locally funded TDM activities and those relevant SF UPP projects. Approximately ¼ of the effort for this task is expected to be expended on work relating to the TDM portion of the SF UPP. Task 1 Deliverables and Schedule:

Participation in National Evaluation process: ongoing throughout SF UPP implementation period, to December 2010

Memorandum describing TDM and SF UPP linkages: May 2009

Task 2: San Francisco area-wide pricing feasibility studies This task will support San Francisco’s area-wide pricing effort, called the Mobility, Access, and Pricing Study (MAPS), a conceptual feasibility study funded by a separate FHWA Value Pricing Program grant. The Authority expects to release the MAPS draft and final report in late-Spring 2009. Grant funds under this task will support an expansion of public involvement activities to disseminate the study findings. The next phase of work is expected to entail more-detailed system planning to advance implementation of a potential pricing system. This task will also support public education and outreach efforts related to pricing entry to Treasure Island.

Task 2.1 Outreach and dissemination of current feasibility study findings This task will support dissemination of current feasibility study findings. The MAPS project has already completed three rounds of public workshops and outreach, but it is also clear that continued outreach is a critically important element of the effort,

3 of 4

especially as the pricing concepts undergo additional refinement in response to community input. This task will focus mainly on direct outreach to media outlets, key stakeholders, and community groups. Activities will also include outreach materials developed by the consultant, including fact sheets and press releases or press packets. In addition, efforts in this task will be linked with the launch of the Authority’s update to the Countywide Transportation Plan, with the aim of tying the city’s current congestion conditions and congestion management strategies more concretely with the city’s goals for sustainable economic growth and reduced climate change impacts in the coming years. The Authority’s consultants will support logistics and development of an agenda for these major outreach events to conclude the feasibility study and launch the visioning component of the Plan. This task is expected to begin in late Spring 2009, to coincide with completion of the feasibility study, and continue through the Fall of 2009. Task 2.1 Deliverables:

Major workshop within the congestion pricing focus area: Summer 2009

Neighborhood and regional workshops (4-6): Summer – Fall 2009

Online webinars (2-5): Summer 2009

Community, merchant, and Central Business District meetings (multiple): Summer – Fall 2009

Summary report of outreach activities: Fall 2009

Poll on attitudes toward congestion and congestion pricing: Fall 2009

Summary report of poll responses and report on changes since round one polling at start of study: Fall 2009

Task 2.2 Next-phase feasibility study The next phase of work is expected to entail more-detailed system planning, including: design of the potential pricing system; continued public outreach; definition of an ongoing evaluation and monitoring program, including both policy and technical components. This task will also include further definition of the potential priced area, including pricing policy, discount policy, and use of funds to improve mobility, with a view to creating an initial framework of an expenditure plan for pricing revenue. Activities will also support environmental review of the congestion pricing program, with consultant support, and development of legislative initiatives. This task is expected to begin in Fall 2009, following the completion of the feasibility study, and continue through the end of 2010.

4 of 4

Task 2.2 Deliverables: Refined description of potential multimodal improvements and programs to

support network enhancement and demand shift, culminating in a potential investment package: Winter 2009 - Spring 2010

Description of monitoring and evaluation program, including policy approach and technical components: Spring 2010

Refined description of pricing program, based on public feedback, legislative initiatives and refinement of potential plan: Summer - Fall 2010

Environmental documentation of potential congestion pricing program (pending Board approval): Winter 2010

Cost Estimate The cost estimate for these tasks totals approximately $509,000, comprised of $407,000 for the 80% share of UPP grant funds and $102,000 for the 20% share of local match funds. The proposed budget supports the Authority staff and consultant activities described above. Cost detail is provided below.

2 Area-Wide Pricing Feasibility Study Support

Labor Category Rate Hours Cost Hours Cost Hours Cost Hours Cost

Authority * Manager 107$ 100 10,700$ 200 21,400$ 300 32,100$ Principal Planner 79$ 350 27,650$ 500 39,500$ 850 67,150$ Senior Planner 68$ 240 16,320$ 50 3,400$ 300 20,400$ 590 40,120$ Planner 59$ 300 17,700$ 500 29,500$ 800 47,200$ Authority Subtotal 240 16,320$ 800 59,450$ 1,500 110,800$ 2,540 186,570$

Consultant Staff 1 200$ 100 20,000$ 700 140,000$ 800 160,000$ Staff 2 125$ 400 50,000$ 900 112,500$ 1300 162,500$ Consultant Subtotal 500 70,000$ 1,600 252,500$ 2,100 322,500$

Grand Totals 240 16,320$ 1,300 129,450$ 3,100 363,300$ 4,640 509,070$

Local Match (20%) 101,814$

Federal Share (80%) 407,256$

*Authority staff salaries include a 42.11% fringe benefit rate.

1 UPP Eval. SupportTotal2.1 Outreach & Dissem. 2.2 Next-Phase Study

5YPP Amendment The recommended action will require a 5YPP amendment to the TDM/Parking Management category to reprogram $70,000 in unallocated Fiscal Year 2007/08 funds and $7,890 in unallocated Fiscal Year 2008/09 funds currently programmed to the Parking Assessment Studies project to the subject project. These funds are no longer needed for the Parking Assessment Studies project due to the award of federal funds to the MTA’s SFpark project included in San Francisco’s UPP grant.


FY 2008/09

Project Name:


ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE

Type : Completion Date

(mm/dd/yy)

Status:

Start Date End DateQuarter Fiscal Year Quarter Fiscal Year

4 2008/09 2 2010/11

N/A N/AN/A N/A

N/A N/A


SCHEDULE COORDINATION/NOTES


Environmental Studies (PA&ED)

PROJECT DELIVERY MILESTONES

Provide project delivery milestones for each sub-project included in the current request, if appropriate. Describe coordination with other project schedules or external deadlines (e.g., obligation deadlines) that impact the project schedule, if relevant.

Planning/Conceptual Engineering

Start Procurement (e.g. rolling stock)Project Completion (i.e., Open for Use)

Design Engineering (PS&E)R/W Activities/AcquisitionAdvertise ConstructionStart Construction (e.g., Award Contract)

Enter dates for ALL project phases, not just for the current request. Use July 1 as the start of the fiscal year. Use 1, 2, 3, 4 to denote quarters and XXXX/XX for the fiscal year (e.g. 2008/09). Additonal schedule detail may be provided in the text box below.

This request is for the Authority's share of local match for the San Francisco Urban Partnership Program (UPP) Pre-Implementation grant from USDOT. Pre-Implementation work includes participation in the Program's National Evaluation, as well as conducting the next stage of area-wide congestion pricing work for the Authority's Mobility, Access, and Pricing Study. All work is expected to be complete by December 2010.

P:\Prop K\FY0809\ARF Pending\SFCTA UPP Pre Imp, 2-Schedule Form v. 0809 Page 2 of 11

San Francisco Urban Partnership Program Pre-Implementation GrantDeliverable Schedule

Deliverable Dates

Task 1 UPP evaluationParticipation in National Evaluation process June 2009 to December 2010Memorandum describing TDM and SF UPP linkages June 2009

Task 2 Area-wide pricing feasibility studies2.1 Outreach and disseminationMajor workshop within congestion pricing focus area Summer 2009Neighborhood and regional workshops (4-6) Summer to Fall 2009Online webinars (2-5) Summer 2009Community, merchant, and Central Business District meetings (multiple) Summer to Fall 2009Summary report of outreach activities Fall 2009Poll on attitudes toward congestion and pricing Fall 2009Summary report of poll responses and changes since round one polling Fall 2009

2.2 Next-phase feasibility studyRefined description of potential multimodal improvements and investment package Winter to Spring 2009

Description of monitoring and evaluation program Spring 2010Refined description of pricing program Summer to Fall 2010Environmental documentation Winter 2010


FY 2008/09

Project Name:


COST SUMMARY BY PHASE - CURRENT REQUEST

Cost for Current Request/Phase

Yes/No Total CostYes

COST SUMMARY BY PHASE - ENTIRE PROJECT

Total Cost Source of Cost Estimate$509,000

$509,000 Expected Useful Life: 50 Years

Prop K - Current Request

$77,890$509,000

$509,000 $77,890

Design Engineering (PS&E)


ConstructionProcurement (e.g. rolling stock)


Operations


USDOT/Caltrans Cooperative Agreement

Total:

Environmental Studies (PA&ED)Design Engineering (PS&E)R/W Activities/Acquisition


Operations

ConstructionProcurement (e.g. rolling stock)

Environmental Studies (PA&ED)

R/W Activities/Acquisition

Enter expected useful life of completed capital project (e.g., use audit number).

Allocations will generally be for one phase only. Multi-phase allocations will be considered on a case-by-case basis.

In the table below provide information just for the phase or phases included in the CURRENT Prop K request. For instance, if the request is for Phase 1 of a planning study, just show the total cost for Phase 1 and the amount of Prop K funds requested for Phase 1.

Show total cost for ALL project phases based on best available information.

Source of cost estimate is intended to help gauge the quality of the cost estimate, which should improve in reliablity the farther along a project is in its development.

P:\Prop K\FY0809\ARF Pending\SFCTA UPP Pre Imp, 3-Cost Form v. 0809 Page 4 of 11

San Francisco Urban Partnership ProgramPre-Implementation Cost EstimateLast Edited: 4.17.09

2 Area-Wide Pricing Feasibility Study Support

Labor Category Rate Hours Cost Hours Cost Hours Cost Hours Cost

Authority * Manager 107$ 100 10,700$ 200 21,400$ 300 32,100$ Principal Planner 79$ 350 27,650$ 500 39,500$ 850 67,150$ Senior Planner 68$ 240 16,320$ 50 3,400$ 300 20,400$ 590 40,120$ Planner 59$ 300 17,700$ 500 29,500$ 800 47,200$ Authority Subtotal 240 16,320$ 800 59,450$ 1,500 110,800$ 2,540 186,570$

Consultant Staff 1 200$ 100 20,000$ 700 140,000$ 800 160,000$ Staff 2 125$ 400 50,000$ 900 112,500$ 1300 162,500$ Consultant Subtotal 500 70,000$ 1,600 252,500$ 2,100 322,500$

Grand Totals 240 16,320$ 1,300 129,450$ 3,100 363,300$ 4,640 509,070$

Local Match (20%) 101,814$

Federal Share (80%) 407,256$

*Authority staff salaries include a 42.11% fringe benefit rate.

1 UPP Eval. SupportTotal2.1 Outreach & Dissem. 2.2 Next-Phase Study


FY

Project Name:


FUNDING PLAN - FOR CURRENT PROP K REQUEST

Prop K Funds Requested:

5-Year Prioritization Program Amount: (enter if appropriate)

Strategic Plan Amount for Requested FY:

Programmed

$0

Prop K Match % - Current Request:Total from Cost worksheet


Prop K sales tax

SB45 planning, programming & monitor.USDOT UPP

Total: $509,000$0

$24,110 $24,110$0

15.30%

$0$0

$77,890$407,000$407,000

$0

$0$0

Fund Source

$501,000


$0

Allocated TotalPlanned

$77,890 $431,110

$77,890

$77,890

$509,000

2008/09

Enter the funding plan for the phase or phases for which Prop K funds are currently being requested. Totals should match those shown on the Cost worksheet.

If the amount requested is inconsistent (e.g., greater than) with the Strategic Plan amount and/or the 5-Year Prioritization Program (5YPP), provide a justification in the space below including a detailed explanation of which other project or projects will be deleted, deferred, etc. to accommodate the current request and maintain consistency with the 5YPP and/or Strategic Plan annual programming levels.

The requested appropriation requires a concurrent 5YPP amendment to program $77,890 from the Parking Assessment Studies project to the subject project. See the Authority Recommendations section for more details.

The Strategic Plan amount includes $414,000 in Fiscal Year 2008/09 funds and $87,000 in unprogrammed funds from prior fiscal years, for a total of $501,000.

P:\Prop K\FY0809\ARF Pending\SFCTA UPP Pre Imp, 5-Funding Form v. 0809 Page 6 of 11


Is Prop K providing local match funds for a state or federal grant? Yes

Required Local Match%

20.00%

FUNDING PLAN - FOR ENTIRE PROJECT (ALL PHASES)

Programmed

$0

Prop K Match % - Entire Project:Total from Cost worksheet

FISCAL YEAR CASH FLOW DISTRIBUTION FOR CURRENT PROP K REQUEST

Prop K Funds Requested:

Sponsor Request - Proposed Prop K Cash Flow Distribution ScheduleReimbursed

Annually

13%87%0%0%0%

FY 2008/09

Total:

FY 2009/10

Total:

Fiscal Year

Fund Source

$0

$0$0

Urban Partnership Program (UPP)Fund Source

$0

$67,890

$0

$509,000

Balance

$0

$0

$0

$0

Planned

$0$10,000

$0

$67,890

$

$0

$101,750

$0Total

$0

$0.00

Allocated

$0

Cash Flow

$ Amount

$407,000

#DIV/0!

$77,890

$0

$77,890

$0

Entire the funding plan for all phases (environmental studies through construction) of the project. This section may be left blank if the current request covers all project phases. Totals should match those shown on the Costworksheet.

Use the table below to enter the cash flow distribution schedule (e.g. the maximum Prop K funds that are guaranteed to be available for reimbursement each fiscal year) that you would like for the current request. If theschedule is more aggressive than the Strategic Plan and/or 5YPP, please explain in the text box below how cash flow for other projects and programs will be slowed down to accommodate the current request without exceeding annual cash flow assumptions made in the Strategic Plan.

P:\Prop K\FY0809\ARF Pending\SFCTA UPP Pre Imp, 5-Funding Form v. 0809 Page 7 of 11


This section is to be completed by Authority Staff.

Last Updated: 04.16.09 Resolution. No. Res. Date:

Project Name:

Implementing Agency:Phase:

Prop K Recommended: Appropriation

Total:

Cash Flow Distribution Schedule by Fiscal Year (for entire allocation/appropriation)EP

Line%

Reimbursable

43 13%43 87% 0% 0%

0%100%

Cash Flow Distribution Schedule by Fiscal Year & Phase (for entire allocation/appropriation)EP

Line Fiscal YearMaximum

Reimbursement

43 FY 2008/09 $10,00043 FY 2009/10 $67,890

$77,890

Prop K Fund Expiration Date: Eligible expenses must be incurred prior to this date.

AUTHORITY RECOMMENDATION

Total:

Notes (e.g.,justification for multi-phase recommendations, notes for multi-EP line item or multi-sponsor recommendations):

$0

$10,000 $67,890

Amount$77,890

$67,890FY 2008/09



Balance

$0

Total: $77,890

Fiscal Year Maximum Reimbursement

$77,890

6/30/2011

13%

Cumulative % Reimbursable


$0

FY 2009/10

$0

$67,890Planning/Conceptual EngineeringPhase

$0

Balance


100%

100%

100% $0$0$0

100%

P:\Prop K\FY0809\ARF Pending\SFCTA UPP Pre Imp, 6-Authority Rec Form v. 0809 Page 8 of 11


This section is to be completed by Authority Staff.

Last Updated: 04.16.09 Resolution. No. Res. Date:

Project Name:


AUTHORITY RECOMMENDATION



Action Fiscal Year PhaseFuture Commitment to:

Trigger:

Deliverables:1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

Special Conditions:1.

2.

3.

Notes:1.

2.

3.

Sub-project detail? No If yes, see next page(s) for sub-project detail.

TA Project Reviewer: P&PD Project # from SGA:

Amount

The requested funds are to, in combination with the SB45 Planning, Programming and Monitoring funds, cover the local match portion for the proposed scope of work.Reminder: Quarterly progress reports are required for appropriations.

The recommended appropriation is contingent upon a 5YPP amendment to reprogram $70,000 in FY 2007/08 funds and $7,890 in FY 2008/09 funds currently programmed to the Parking Assessment Studies project to the subject project. See attached 5YPP amendment for details.

Upon completion of the deliverable, provide the Memorandum describing Transportation Demand Management and San Francisco UPP linkages (Task 1, expected May 2009)Upon completion of the deliverable, provide summary report of outreach activities and summary report of poll responses and changes since round one polling (Task 2.1, expected Fall 2009).Upon completion of the deliverable, provide refined descriptions of potential investment package, monitoring and evaluation program, and pricing program (Task 2.2, expected Spring 2010)Upon completion of the deliverable, provide environmental documentation of potential congestion pricing program (Task 2.2, expected Winter 2010).

P:\Prop K\FY0809\ARF Pending\SFCTA UPP Pre Imp, 6-Authority Rec Form v. 0809 Page 9 of 11


MAPS AND DRAWINGS

Two options currently under consideration for congestion pricing. Shading indicates cordon area for congestion pricing, stars on the Double Ring option indicate additional "gateway" locations.

Insert or attach files of maps, drawings, photos of current conditions, photo compositions, etc. to support understanding of the project scope and evaluation of how geographic diversity was considered in the project prioritization process.

This text box and the blue header may be deleted to better accommodate any graphics.

P:\Prop K\FY0809\ARF Final\SFCTA UPP Pre Imp, 7-Maps.etc Form v. 0809 Page 10 of 11


FY of Allocation Action: 2008/09 Current Request:

Project Name:


Signatures

Project Manager Grants Section Contact

Name (typed):Chief Deputy Director

Title:

Phone:

Fax:

Email:

Address:

Signature:

Date:


$77,890

100 Van Ness Avenue, 26th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94102

Maria Lombardo

for Policy and Programming

415.522.4802

415.522.4829

[email protected]

100 Van Ness Avenue, 26th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94102

Deputy Director for Planning

415.522.4832

[email protected]


Tilly Chang

By signing below, we the undersigned verify that: 1) sales tax revenues shall be used to supplement and under no circumstance replace existing local revenues used for transportation purposes and 2) the requested sales tax funds will not be used to cover expenses incurred prior to Authority Board approval of the allocation.

415.522.4829

Please sign in blue ink.

P:\Prop K\FY0809\ARF Pending\SFCTA UPP Pre Imp, 8-Signatures Form v. 0809 Page 11 of 11

Prop K 5YPP Living Program of Projects

Agency Project Name FY 04/05 FY 05/06 FY 06/07 FY 07/08 FY 08/09 5- Yr TotalSFCTA 5YPP Development 8,000 8,000PLANNING Transit Effectiveness Project (MEA Position)7 8,000 8,000

DOE Commuter Benefits Program (Clean Air Program)3 311,000 90,000 99,000 100,000 119,790 719,790DOE Emergency Ride Program (Clean Air Program)4 10,000 11,000 11,000 13,310 45,310DOE Bicycle Program (Clean Air Program)5 10,000 10,000 20,000 10,000 50,000DOE Regional Rideshare Program Delegated County (Clean Air Program)6 35,884 35,884MTA-DPT Bicycle Plan Update Policy Framework Env. Review 24,000 24,000PLANNING City Carshare 100,000 100,000

MTA-DPT Pedestrian Master Plan 115,854 115,854MTA-DPT/SFCTA Pedestrian Master Plan Part 2 & 3 44,146 160,000 204,146MTA-MUNI Network Planning - Route Restructuring7 150,000 142,000 292,000

SFCTA On-Street Parking Management Study 45,000 45,000SFCTA Congestion Pricing Feasibility Study - Local Match 1 100,000 30,000 130,000SFCTA Urban Partnership Program (UPP) Pre-Implementation - Local Match 8 77,890 77,890

SFCTA/ PLANNING Parking Assessment Studies 2, 8 0 92,110 92,110

Total Programmed in 5YPP 443,000 315,000 380,000 311,000 498,984 1,947,984Total Allocated To Date 443,000 315,000 380,000 131,000 186,984 1,455,984

Total Unallocated To Date 0 0 0 180,000 312,000 492,000

Total Programmed in Strategic Plan 443,000 315,000 379,000 399,000 414,000 1,950,000Cumulative Remaining Programming Capacity 0 0 (1,000) 87,000 2,016

= Already allocated

Modal Plans

Pricing and Parking Management

EP 43 - Transportation Demand and Parking Management

Last Update: 04.17.09

Citywide TDM

Programming and Allocations To-date

Prop K Funds Programmed By Year

P:\Prop K\SP-5YPP\2005 Living\5YPP\43 Transportation Demand and Parking Mgmt Page 1 of 2

Prop K 5YPP Living Program of Projects

= Pending allocation

5YPP Amendment to accommodate local match for the Congestion Pricing Feasibility Study (11.30.06):

5YPP Amendment to accommodate addition of the Regional Rideshare Program Delegate County project (07.15.08):

1 $100,000 in FY 2006/07 and $30,000 FY 2007/08 funds added for the Congestion Pricing Feasibility Study.2 FY 2006/07 funds reduced from $100,000 to $0 and FY 2007/08 funds reduced from $100,000 to $70,000.

5YPP Amendment to accommodate change in funding needs for individual projects within Clean Air Program and to reconcile with FY 2007/08 TFCA recommended programming. Total of $131,000 still programmed for the Clean Air Program (05.02.07):

5YPP Amendment to fund new Transit Effectiveness Project (MEA Position) project (Res. 09-46, 02.24.09)

6 Regional Rideshare Program Delegated County project programmed using $35,884 of the unprogrammed capacity ($37,900 in FY 2008/09) leaving $2,016 of unprogrammed capacity in FY 2008/09.

8 Reprogrammed $70,000 in FY 2007/08 and $7,890 in FY 2008/09 funds from the Parking Assessment Studies project to the UPP Pre-Implementation - Local Match project.

Pending 5YPP Amendment to fund Urban Partnership Program (UPP) Pre-Implementation - Local Match project:

3 Commuter Benefits Program amended from $108,900 in FY 2007/08 to $100,0004 Emergency Ride Home Program amended from $12,100 in FY 2007/08 to $11,0005 Bicycle Program amended from $10,000 in FY 2007/08 to $20,000

7Reprogramed $8,000 in FY 08/09 funds from MTA's Route Restructuring project to a new Planning Department project (Transit Effectiveness Project (MEA Position) in FY 08/09.

P:\Prop K\SP-5YPP\2005 Living\5YPP\43 Transportation Demand and Parking Mgmt Page 2 of 2

Attachment 2.Prop K FY 2008/09 Capital Budget

Cash Flow DistributionEP # Sponsor Project Name Total FY 2008/09 FY 2009/10 FY 2010/11 FY 2011/12

TRANSIT1 MTA (MUNI) 6th and Irving TPS Improvements $60,000 $60,000

1 MTA (DPT)McAllister One-Way to Two-Way Conversion Between Hyde and Jones Streets $142,000 $142,000

1 Planning MEA Environmental Planner III $21,750 $5,438 $16,3121 SFCTA 19th Avenue TPS Bulb-Outs - Env. Phase $717,000 $143,400 $573,600

5 TJPAConstruction Management/General Contractor (CM/GC) Pre-Construction Services Contract $4,300,000 $500,000 $3,300,000 $500,000

5 TJPADemolition and Construction Management (CM) Services Contracts $8,000,000 $1,100,000 $6,900,000

5 TJPAPE Phase for Architecture & Engineering of Transit Center Building & Ramps $12,810,000 $8,330,000 $4,480,000

7 PCJPB Signal and Communication Improvements $12,000 $12,0007 PCJPB Operational Facilities & Equipment $410,967 $410,9677 PCJPB Maintenance of Engineering Standards $145,000 $145,000

7 PCJPBCaltrain 2025 Implementation Plan & Capital Project Development $1,333,334 $1,333,334

17M MTA (MUNI) Restoration of 8 Light Rail Vehicles $2,600,000 $550,000 $1,550,000 $500,000

17M MTA (MUNI)Vehicle Driver Risk Management System (DriveCam) $2,000,000 $1,200,000 $800,000

17P PCJPB Operational Facilities & Equipment $406,000 $277,627 $128,37318 MTA (MUNI) Trolleybus wheelchair lift O&M $350,000 $350,00019 MTA (MUNI) F-line historic streetcar O&M $683,000 $683,000

20M MTA (MUNI) Green Roof and HVAC Replacement Project $782,681 $391,340 $391,34120P PCJPB Operational Facilities & Equipment $200,266 $200,26620P PCJPB Systemwide Station Improvements $333,333 $333,33320P PCJPB South Terminal Station $160,000 $160,000

21 MTA (MUNI) MUNI MMX O&M $2,314,000 $2,314,00022M MTA (MUNI) Capital Planning and Grants Staffing $420,000 $420,00022M MTA (MUNI) Central Control UPS Replacement $100,000 $100,000

22M MTA (MUNI) Central Control HVAC Computer Room Upgrade $100,000 $100,00022M MTA (MUNI) ATCS Network Upgrades to Windows $100,000 $100,00022M MTA (MUNI) Misc. Rail Replacement $2,735,000 $1,367,500 $1,367,500

22M MTA (MUNI)Church and Duboce Track Improvement - Additional Funds $210,000 $105,000 $105,000

22M MTA (MUNI) Cable Car Propulsion Controller Upgrade $1,845,844 $369,168 $922,922 $553,754

22M MTA (MUNI)Overhead Rehabilitation - Traction Power Feeders - Additional Funding $437,278 $43,728 $371,686 $21,864

22M MTA (MUNI)Overhead Rehabilitation - Traction Power Substations - Additional Funding $907,973 $90,797 $726,379 $90,797

22P PCJPB Signal and Communication Improvements $185,000 $185,00022P PCJPB Systemwide Track Rehabilitation Program $216,667 $216,667

22P PCJPBSystemwide Track Rehabilitation Program - Additional $15,994 $15,994

22P PCJPB Bridge Replacement and Rehabilitation Program $148,333 $74,166 $74,167Transit Subtotal: $45,203,420 $21,829,725 $21,707,280 $1,666,415 $0

PARATRANSIT23 MTA (MUNI) Paratransit $9,670,000 $9,670,000

Paratransit Subtotal: $9,670,000 $9,670,000 $0 $0 $0

Capital Budget FY 0809 April Capital Budget - 1 [Revised 12/23/2008] Page 1 of 4



STREETS AND TRAFFIC SAFETY

25 DPWBernal Heights Street Improvements - Bradford/Jarboe Area $698,000 $350,000 $348,000

27 SFCTA Bi-County Area Planning and Design Study $45,000 $22,500 $22,500

30 MTA (DPT)Mission-Geneva Pedestrian Improvements - Local Match $27,000 $27,000

30 MTA (DPT) 19th Avenue Edgeline Project $185,000 $63,825 $121,17531 MTA (DPT) New Signal Contract 59 $1,493,596 $746,866 $630,000 $116,73031 MTA (DPT) Contract 59 Supplemental $208,830 $208,830

31 MTA (DPT)New Signal at Skyline Boulevard, Herbst Road, and Lake Merced Boulevard. $106,650 $53,325 $53,325

31 MTA (DPT)New Signal at Divisadero/Grove Sts-Conduit/Pull Boxes $22,540 $22,540

32 MTA (DPT)Oak and Fell Streets ITMS Deployment - Supplemental Funds $463,300 $463,300

33 MTA (DPT) Signal Equipment Procurement $475,000 $475,00033 MTA (DPT) Traffic Sign Grafitti Program 2009 $122,500 $122,50034 DPW Street Resurfacing $2,880,000 $1,440,000 $1,440,00035 DPW Street Repair and Cleaning Equipment $670,000 $335,000 $335,000

36 DPWEmbarcadero Roadway Operations and Maintenance $341,944 $341,944

37 DPW Public Sidewalk Repair $539,120 $539,12038 MTA (DPT) 24th and Mission BART Station Area Curb Bulbs $64,500 $32,250 $32,250

38 MTA (DPT)Tenderloin Pedestrian Improvements - Construction $53,900 $53,900

38 MTA (DPT) Masonic Avenue Traffic Calming Plan $120,000 $20,000 $80,000 $20,00038 Planning MEA Environmental Planner III $2,500 $625 $1,87539 MTA (DPT) Colored Bicycle Lane Experiment $225,000 $30,000 $185,000 $10,00039 MTA (DPT) Bike to Work Day Promotion $165,768 $92,000 $73,76839 MTA (DPT) Bicycle Safety Education Classes $121,774 $43,000 $54,000 $24,77439 Planning MEA Environmental Planner III $75,000 $18,750 $56,25039 MTA (DPT) Citywide Bicycle Counters $126,194 $126,19440 MTA (DPT) Ladder Crosswalks Maintenance $71,250 $35,625 $35,62540 MTA (DPT) Accessible Pedestrian Signals $775,000 $581,250 $193,75040 MTA (DPT) 24th and Mission BART Station Area Curb Bulbs $65,500 $32,750 $32,750

40 MTA (DPT)Tenderloin Pedestrian Improvements - Construction $136,100 $136,100

41 DPW Curb Ramps $701,000 $21,000 $680,00042 DPW Tree Planting and Maintenance $977,416 $977,416

Streets and Traffic Safety Subtotal: $11,959,382 $6,740,480 $5,047,398 $171,504 $0

TSM/STRATEGIC INITIATIVES43 DOE Clean Air Program $143,100 $143,100

43 DOEClean Air Program - Regional Rideshare Program Delegate County $35,884 $35,884

43 Planning MEA Environmental Planner III $8,000 $2,000 $6,000

43 SFCTAUrban Partnership Program Pre-Implementation Local Match $77,890 $10,000 $67,890

44 SFCTABayview/Hunters Point Neighborhood Transportation Plan $11,000 $9,000 $2,000

44 DPW Leland Avenue Streetscape Improvements Project $212,480 $63,744 $127,488 $21,24844 DPW A Renewed Valencia Streetscape $500,000 $150,000 $300,000 $50,000




44 SFCTA2008 Eastern Neighborhoods Travel Behavior Survey - Phase 2 $50,000 $50,000

44 SFCTAWestern SoMa Neighborhood Transportation Plan $40,000 $30,000 $10,000

44 SFCTAMarket and Octavia/Central Freeway Circulation Planning & Design Study $90,000 $73,500 $16,500

44 SFCTA Tenderloin Traffic Calming & Circulation $15,000 $7,500 $7,50044 Planning MEA Environmental Planner III $46,500 $11,625 $34,875

TSM/Strategic Initiatives Subtotal: $1,229,854 $586,353 $572,253 $71,248 $0

SUBTOTAL $68,062,656 $38,826,558 $27,326,931 $1,909,167 $0

SWAPS

RBPP (CMAQ) - Prop K Fund Swap1 $863,000 $560,000 $303,000 $0

TOTAL $68,925,656 $39,386,558 $27,629,931 $1,909,167 $0

Shaded lines indicate allocations/appropriations that are part of the current action.

1 Amount shown is part of a $2.025 million swap of Fiscal Year 2008/09 Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) funds programmed to 3 MTA Regional Bicycle and Pedestrian Program (RBPP) projects with an equivalent amount of Fiscal Year 2008/09 Prop K funds programmed to MTA's New Central Subway project. See Resolution 09-25, approved on November 25, 2008 for swap details.


Attachment 3.Prop K FY 2008/09 Capital Budget Summary

Cash Flow Distribution

Total FY 2008/09 FY 2009/10 FY 2010/11 FY 2011/12

Prior Allocations 68,847,766 39,376,558 27,562,041 1,909,167 0Current Request(s) 77,890 10,000 67,890 0 0New Total Allocations 68,925,656 39,386,558 27,629,931 1,909,167 0

NotesThis table shows Cash Flow Distribution Schedules for all FY 2008/09 allocations approved to date, along with the current recommended allocation(s). This includes Prop K funds allocated as part of the RBPP (CMAQ) - Prop K fund swap. See note 1 of Attachment 2 for further information.

Capital Budget FY 0809 April CF Summary - 1 Page 4 of 4

Documents

PPC051209 RESOLUTION NO. 09-69 · 2009. 6. 9. · ppc051209 resolution no. 09-69 h:\resolutions\2009res\r09-69 prop k sfcta upp match.doc page 1 of 4 resolution appropriating $77,890