Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
4/8/2014
1
P R E S E N T E D B Y
How We’ve Perpetuated
Organizational Excellence
Eric Franks
Technology & QA Manager
A p r i l 1 5 , 2 0 1 4
Bryan Vaughn
President
How We’ve Perpetuated
Organizational Excellence
KEY CONCEPTS:
• Our Company & Product
• Our Culture & Environment
• Key Steps Along the Way
• How We’ve Kept it Going
• Where We’re Headed Now
GOAL STATEMENT:
To help you see how the pursuit of Organizational Excellence has
benefited our company, so that you can see why you should: “Take
Every Opportunity to Demonstrate that Organizational Excellence Is
Your Priority by Making it Personal!”
Our Company
Leipsic, OH 1,500,000-ton
capacity
1990 joint venture between
U. S. Steel & Kobe Steel
CGL1 CGL2
CAL
Our Product
A Focus on Safety
Crumple Zones
(engine compartment, trunk)
deform to absorb energy and
control magnitude of deceleration
Safety Cage
(passenger compartment)
resists deformation to prevent intrusion
Steels for Crumple Zone
• Highest Energy Absorbing
• Strength AND Ductility
• Dual Phase and TRIP Grades Preferred
Steels for Safety Cage Zone
• Highest Strength
• High Tensile Dual Phase, Martensite,
and Boron Steels Preferred
Our Culture
“We are what we
repeatedly
do. Excellence,
therefore, is not an
act, but a habit.”
Aristotle
• Self-directed work teams
• All Associates are salaried
• Promotions occur from within
4/8/2014
2
Concept of Boundaries
Leadership is safety.
Leadership is service.
Leadership is trust.
Everyone Is a Leader Concept of Boundaries
Processes wrapped in culture ensure
quality by establishing broad boundaries
within which our Associates are free to
practice ORA and innovate!
Provide
basis to make
decisions
Freedom to
be self-
directed
Freedom to
be
innovative
Freedom
to grow
“If you can’t explain it simply, you don’t
understand it well enough.”
– Albert Einstein
Growth Phase (1993 – 2000)
• Documentation
• “Big Honking Binders”
• Automotive Supplement
ISO 9001 (’96) & QS
(‘97)
• Increased Capacity 67%
• Increased Workforce 62%
• Largest Automotive Hot-Dip Galvanize
CGL2 (‘98)
• Environmental Policy & Work Instructions
• Integrated into Quality & Environmental System (QES)
• OAE Inaugural Recipients
ISO 14001 & QES (2000)
Criteria for Performance Excellence
Customers
(Outputs)
Workforce
Context
Process
Management
&Improvement
Suppliers
(Inputs)
This is who we are &
what we do
1. Key Organization Factors
• Organizational Description
– Org. Environment
– Org. Relationships
• Organizational Situation
– Competitive Environment
– Strategic Context
– Performance Improvement
System
This is how we do what we do
3. Processes & Systems 1. Leadership
2. Strategic Planning
3. Customer Focus
4. Measurement, Analysis,
and Knowledge
5. Workforce Focus
6. Operations Focus
This is how well we do it
4. Results / Outcomes 7.1 Product & Process
7.2 Customer-Focused
7.3 Workforce-Focused
7.4 Leadership &
Governance
7.5 Financial & Market
This is what we believe
2. Core Values • Visionary Leadership
• Customer-Driven Excellence
• Organizational & Personal Learning
• Valuing Workforce Members & Partners
• Agility
• Focus on the Future
• Managing for Innovation
• Management by Fact
• Social Respons./Community
• Focus on Results & Creating
Value
• Systems Perspective
Seeking Phase (2001 – 2005)
• Preparation – OAE
• Gap Analysis – “Quality Assurance Guy’s”
• Site visit, Feedback Report, & Lots of Opportunities for Improvement (OFIs)
• Tier 3 Recognition
Initial OAE (2001-02)
• Voluntary Program with Goals & Objectives
• Refined Financial Controls & Procurement Manual
EPA-NEPT & SOX (2003)
• Strategic Planning, Key Success Factors, Balanced Scorecard, Surveys, & OFIs
• Site Visit, Feedback Report, & Lots of OFIs
• Governor’s Award (Tier 4)
2nd OAE (2003-04)
**Ohio Partnership for Excellence: Governor’s Award (September 17, 2004)
**Now known as The Partnership
for Excellence which includes Ohio,
West Virginia, and Indiana
4/8/2014
3
Seeking Phase (2001 – 2005)
• Systems Approach
• Outcomes-Based
• Beyond Compliance & Actively Soliciting OFIs
QS to ISO/TS 16949 (2004)
• Voluntary Program • STAR Site, 1st in Standard Industrial Code, and VPP and NEPT in Ohio
• VPP Site Visit, Feedback Report, Lots of OFIs
OSHA VPP (2004)
• Criteria, Focus on Support Processes, and OFIs
• Validated OAE Evaluation
• Consensus, Feedback Report, and Lots of OFIs
1st MBNQA (2005)
Innovation Phase (2006 > > > >)
• Mapped Critical Systems, 6-D Methodology, and OFIs
• Leadership Team Category Ownership • Site Visit, Feedback Report, and Lots of OFIs
2nd MBNQA (2006)
• ISO/TS and VPP Recertification (3-Year Cycle)
• VPP Site Visit, Feedback Report, Lots of OFIs
ISO/TS 16949 &
VPP (2007)
• Criteria, Mapped Culture, Vision, Tactical Team, Individual Plans, and OFIs
• Embraced by Organization
• Site Visit, Feedback Report, Lots of OFIs, BAR
3rd MBNQA (2007)
Our Journey Has Just Begun....
April 22, 2008
Where We Are Today
Baldrige Performance Excellence Criteria
• Root Cause Analysis
• Interim Actions
• Corrective Actions
• Systematic Continuous Improvement
ISO 9001, ISO 14001, ISO/TS 16949, ISO 17025
Click to edit Master title style
4/8/2014 17
Concept of Boundaries Our Mission
To foster human
potential, a spirit of
cooperation, and
technical innovation
for the betterment of
our industry,
Associates, and
community.
Vision
BE
DO
HAVE
• Totally committed to personal safety and wellness.
• Recognized as industry technology leader in both
product and process.
• Consistently profitable.
• Provide on-time delivery with world-class quality.
• Develop/maintain world-class facility and
business systems.
• Maintain high standard for community citizenship
and service.
• A highly skilled, engaged workforce committed to on-
going performance excellence.
• Optimal utilization of production capacity and
capability.
• Valuable vendor/supplier relationships.
4/8/2014
4
Core Values
• INTEGRITY – We abide by the highest standard
of moral and ethical behavior.
• HONESTY – There is truth in our words and
sincerity in our actions.
• GENEROSITY – We are willing to serve.
• COLLABORATIVE – We are willing to work
together for a common goal.
• HUMILITY – We are confident and humble.
• TRUST – Our stakeholders can rely on us to do
the right thing.
• RESPECT – We appreciate the strength of
individuals and value diversity.
Strategic Position (Core Competency): “Innovation Leader in Technologically Advanced Steel”
Strategic Themes:
• Automotive Market
• Value-Added Steel
• Coated Steel
• Technologically Advanced Steel
• Ultra-High Strength Steel
• Advanced High Strength Steel
• High Strength Steel
Ability to provide break-through processes to meet the customers’
needs using our expertise in technologically advanced automotive
steels. Through highly flexible, innovative teams, we demonstrate
the agility to develop solutions delivering high-quality, reliable
products that meet the demands of our customers.
Innovation Alignment
Organizational excellence
is perpetuated at
PRO-TEC by innovation
being a mindset and a
demonstrated behavior
inherent in our ORA
culture.
Mission: to foster human potential, a spirit of cooperation, and
technical innovation for the betterment of our industry,
Associates, and community.
Vision: BE recognized as the industry technology leader in
both product and process; DO develop/maintain a world-
class facility and business systems; HAVE a highly skilled
workforce committed to ongoing performance excellence.
One of six Key Success Factors: Technical innovation
and product development.
Today’s Records Are Tomorrow’s Standards
Strategic Position (core competency): Innovation Leader in
Technologically Advanced Steel [Strategic Themes: innovative
people and process, flexible organization, we do the tough stuff,
exceeding customer needs, advanced products]
Process Overview Map
Outside
Processing/
Warehouse
Customer
Technical
Service
Shipment to
customer
CUSTOMER
Order
Review
Continuous
Galvanizing
Line
Determine
customer
requirements
Place order
on plant
CUSTOMER
Customer
Service /
Inventory
Management
**Logistical
Services
Human
Resource
Management
Corrective
Action
Continual
Improvement/
Preventive
Action
(I-to-I Process)
Management
Review
Internal AuditsProject
Management
Information
Systems
Reliability
USS Sales
PRO-TECCorporate
Support
Processes
USS Sales
Purchasing
**Support-
Oriented
Processes
Management-
Oriented
Processes
Customer-
Oriented
Processes
Processed
Products
Finishing
Processed
Products
Business
Intelligence
(ASNs)
Corporate
Support
Process
Process Mgmt &
Customer Input
Strategic Planning &
Deployment
Charitable
Contributions,
Scholarships &
Outreach Support
Legal Compliance &
Ethics
Governance System
Leadership System
Knowledge Mgmt
Comparative
Selection Criteria for
Operation Innovation
Customer
Relationship Building
Customer & Market
Knowledge
Customer
Satisfaction
Determination
Customer Complaint
Mgmt
Training Plan
Compensation &
Benefits
Performance Mgmt
System
Work Systems
Safety &
Environmental
Hiring Process
Process Mgmt &
Customer Input
Performance
Excellence
Processes
**Product /
Line
Conditions
Audit
Process Owner (s): Current I-to-I Resource Committee Chairperson, C. Walther
Revised by: C. Walther
Process Input(s): Process Output(s): a: Concern or Potential Problem a: Preventive Actions
b: Business Plan Objectives b: Process Change
c. Key Measures c. Work Instruction Revision
d. **Opportunity for Improvement (OFI) d.
Process Effectiveness Measures: Process Effectiveness Monitoring Techniques:
a: Number of PARs a: Jeopardy Report
b: Outstanding PARs b: Monthly Reports
c.
Various Key Measures / Balanced
Scorecard c. Plant Management Meetings
d. d.
Process Efficiency Measures: Process Efficiency Monitoring Techniques:
a: Monthly Distribution of CARs/PARs/CAPs a: Monthly Reports
b: b:
c: c:
Customer Oriented Processes: Customer Oriented Processes Interactions:
a: Order Review a: Key Measures
b: CGL Process b: Key Measures
c: Finishing Process c: Key Measures
Support or Management Oriented Processes: SOP/MOP Interactions:
a: Internal Audits a: Audit Findings
b: Management Review b: Review Inputs
c: Corrective Action c: CARs
d: d:
e: e:
Methods/Procedures (how?): Equipment: (with what?):
a: Work Instructions a: ISO / TS Requirements
b: I-to-I Process b:
c: PARs c:
d: PAR Feedback d:
e: PAR Presentations at PMM e:
f: f:
Continual Improvement/
Preventive Action
(I-to-I Process) Originator fills in
the first section of
PAR and submits
Mgmt
Systems Analyst
determines
routing?
QA Specialist
assigns&logs PAR
number and types
it and forwards to
PAR Leader
Mgmt Systems
Analyst
assigns PAR
Leader,
if necessary
Forward to QA
Specialist for
typing
Actions
OK?
QA Specialist
closes and
files original
PAR
QA Specialist
assigns PAR
number, types it,
and returns it to
the Mgmt Systems
Analyst
Paperwork
returned to PAR
Leader with
explanation
Direct
to
PAR
Leader
Mgmt Systems
Analyst reviews
submitted PAR
paperwork for
completion
PAR
paperwork
complete?
Appropriate
managers review
PAR
Reviewed by
I-to-I Resource Committee
Open PARs are
reviewed at I-to-I
Resource Committee
Meetings held twice
per month
PAR Leader
completes PAR
paperwork and
submits to Mgmt
Systems Analyst
Return PAR to
PAR Leader with
explanation of
need for further
action
A
Yes
No
Yes
No
B
B
CI is deployed
through the
I-to-I Process
PAR Leader uses
team-oriented
problem-solving
to complete PAR
Mgmt Systems
Analyst presents
to I-to-I Resource
Committee
Chairperson
B
Facilitator
assigned to assist
PAR team
New
PAR
INPUTS Concern or
potential problem Business Plan
Objectives Key Measures OFIs
OUTPUTS Preventive Actions Process Change Work Instruction
Revisions
I-to-I
Resource
Committee
Review
Explanation
given to
Originator
Refuse
PAR
Hold PAR for
further review at
future meeting
End
A
Process
Redesign
Process
Redesign
+ C
om
ple
xity
-
Attributes - Scope +
QES, AssociateOrientation, ORA
Technical Training& Vendor Support
QES, TeamTraining
Strategic PlanningProcessMethods:
Associate Surveys& Evaluations
Reliability, SafetyPreventive /
Corrective ActionsBudgets, Resource
AllocationMeasurements:
“Run-the-Business” Balanced Scorecard (BSC)“Change-the-
Business” BSCTools:
Procedure ChangeEngineering
ChangeTeam-Based
ChangeCapital-Budgeted
ChangeExamples:
QES, AssociateOrientation, ORA
Technical Training& Vendor Support
QES, TeamTraining
Strategic PlanningProcessMethods:
QES, AssociateOrientation, ORA
Technical Training& Vendor Support
QES, TeamTraining
Strategic PlanningProcessMethods:
Associate Surveys& Evaluations
Reliability, SafetyPreventive /
Corrective ActionsBudgets, Resource
AllocationMeasurements:Associate Surveys
& EvaluationsReliability, Safety
Preventive /Corrective Actions
Budgets, ResourceAllocationMeasurements:
“Run-the-Business” Balanced Scorecard (BSC)“Change-the-
Business” BSCTools: “Run-the-Business” Balanced Scorecard (BSC)“Change-the-
Business” BSCTools:
Procedure ChangeEngineering
ChangeTeam-Based
ChangeCapital-Budgeted
ChangeExamples: Procedure ChangeEngineering
ChangeTeam-Based
ChangeCapital-Budgeted
ChangeExamples:
Continuous Improvement &
Innovation Methods (I-to-I)
ORA – “We JustFix It!”
Subject MatterExperts (SME)
I-to-I ResourceCommittee (RC)
LeadershipTeam (LT)Decision:
ORA – “We JustFix It!”
Subject MatterExperts (SME)
I-to-I ResourceCommittee (RC)
LeadershipTeam (LT)Decision:
AssociateSME, Department
Initiatives (6-D)I-to-I PAR Team
SPP – Initiatives(Six Disciplines)Implementation: Associate
SME, DepartmentInitiatives (6-D)
I-to-I PAR TeamSPP – Initiatives(Six Disciplines)Implementation:
Huddles, 7:15Meeting / MP2
Staff Meetings, QES,Bulletins, I-to-I 6-D
PMM Presentation,Bulletins, QES
Tactical Team &Communication Mtgs.
KnowledgeMgmt. Sharing:
Huddles, 7:15Meeting / MP2
Staff Meetings, QES,Bulletins, I-to-I 6-D
PMM Presentation,Bulletins, QES
Tactical Team &Communication Mtgs.
KnowledgeMgmt. Sharing:
Safety Audits &Conversations
IP Status Updates& Outcomes
PAR Feedback &Updates to RC
Initiative Status& Update by 6-DEvaluation:
Safety Audits &Conversations
IP Status Updates& Outcomes
PAR Feedback &Updates to RC
Initiative Status& Update by 6-DEvaluation:
I-to-I
Teams
I-to-I
Teams
Technical
Resources
Technical
Resources
Associate
Responsibility
Associate
Responsibility
Continuous
Improvement
and
Innovation
Process
Redesign
+ C
om
ple
xity
-
Attributes - Scope + QES, Associate
Orientation, ORA Technical Training & Vendor Support
QES, Team Training
Strategic Planning Process Methods:
Associate Surveys & Evaluations Reliability, Safety
Preventive / Corrective Actions
Budgets, Resource Allocation Measurements:
“Run-the-Business” Balanced Scorecard (BSC) “Change-the- Business” BSC Tools:
Procedure Change Engineering
Change Team-Based
Change Capital-Budgeted
Change Examples:
OFI: “Although PRO-TEC has put numerous initiatives in
place with the intent of changing rather than running
the business, technical innovation at an organizational
level is not carried out deliberately through a
repeatable approach.”
Continuous Improvement
Methods (I-to-I)
I-to-I
Teams
Technical
Resources
Associate
Responsibility
ORA – “We Just Fix It!”
Subject Matter Experts (SME)
I-to-I Resource Committee (RC)
Leadership Team (LT) Decision:
Associate SME, Department Initiatives (6-D) I-to-I PAR Team
SPP – Initiatives (Six Disciplines) Implementation:
Huddles, 7:15 Meeting / MP2
Staff Meetings, QES, Bulletins, I-to-I Lite
PMM Presentation, Bulletins, QES
Tactical Team & Communication Mtgs.
Knowledge Mgmt. Sharing:
Safety Audits & Conversations
IP Status Updates & Outcomes
PAR Feedback & Updates to RC
Initiative Status & Update by 6-D Evaluation:
Organizational Learning Trend
World-Class Facility [4]
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Associate Quality of
Life [5]
Customer Service [3]
Technical Innovation
[6] Good Citizenship [1]
Long-Term Viability
[2]
4
3
2
1
0
Maturity Level
by Key Success
Factor [Category]
• Growth – Looking Back (green)
• Seeking – 1st MBNQA (orange)
• Innovation – BAR (blue)
• Current Focus (yellow)
• KEY: Criteria Scoring Guidelines {1-6}
4/8/2014
5
“Search for opportunities to demonstrate
that SAFETY is our #1 Priority.”
– Paul Worstell
“A mind once stretched by a new idea
never regains its original dimension.”
– Oliver Wendell Holmes
0
2,000
4,000
6,000
8,000
10,000
12,000
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
140%
Part
s P
er
Millio
n (
PP
M)
Customer-Focused Trend
Production / Design Capacity (%) GA Value-Added Product-Mix (%)
Milestones Customer Claims (PPM)
CGL-2 AHSS 7xCE UHSS
Design Capacity
Down-Turn
GA V-A =
CE+AHSS+UHSS
1% = 10,000 PPM
“An organization’s ability to learn, and translate that learning
into action rapidly, is the ultimate competitive advantage.”
– Jack Welch
“Anyone who stops learning is old, whether at twenty
or eighty. Anyone who keeps learning stays young.”
- Henry Ford
New Continuous
Annealing Line (CAL)
Conceptual Layout
U. S. Steel and Kobe Steel Announce
Capital Investment in PRO-TEC Coating
Company – (December 2010) U. S. Steel
and Kobe Steel, Ltd., have reached an
agreement for their joint venture, PRO-TEC
Coating Company in Leipsic, Ohio, to begin
construction on a continuous annealing line
at the facility. “With this investment in
PRO-TEC Coating Company, both U. S. Steel
and Kobe Steel are well-positioned to serve
our automotive customers. PRO-TEC is an
industry leader in quality sheet steel products,
and we are pleased to bring another quality
product to market," said John P. Surma,
chairman and chief executive officer of United
States Steel Corporation.
CAL Target Product and Market
• Estimated new market – 211# per mid-sized car
• Supports new rollover rating criteria
• Improved crash resistance
• Improved fuel economy
• About 80 new jobs
CR CAL
Coated Steels
4/8/2014
6
Construction of the Continuous
Annealing Line Continuous Annealing Line
First Prime Coil
February 28, 2013
Malcolm Gets a Bath……
“Do or do not.
There is no try.”
– Yoda