16

PowerPoint Presentation · 2016-10-17 · FET Rank O LOW 80 20 HIGH In line with the national average (102.7) % Expected standard+ (Re, Wr, In line with the national average % Expected

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: PowerPoint Presentation · 2016-10-17 · FET Rank O LOW 80 20 HIGH In line with the national average (102.7) % Expected standard+ (Re, Wr, In line with the national average % Expected
Page 2: PowerPoint Presentation · 2016-10-17 · FET Rank O LOW 80 20 HIGH In line with the national average (102.7) % Expected standard+ (Re, Wr, In line with the national average % Expected
Page 3: PowerPoint Presentation · 2016-10-17 · FET Rank O LOW 80 20 HIGH In line with the national average (102.7) % Expected standard+ (Re, Wr, In line with the national average % Expected
Page 4: PowerPoint Presentation · 2016-10-17 · FET Rank O LOW 80 20 HIGH In line with the national average (102.7) % Expected standard+ (Re, Wr, In line with the national average % Expected
Page 5: PowerPoint Presentation · 2016-10-17 · FET Rank O LOW 80 20 HIGH In line with the national average (102.7) % Expected standard+ (Re, Wr, In line with the national average % Expected
Page 6: PowerPoint Presentation · 2016-10-17 · FET Rank O LOW 80 20 HIGH In line with the national average (102.7) % Expected standard+ (Re, Wr, In line with the national average % Expected
Page 7: PowerPoint Presentation · 2016-10-17 · FET Rank O LOW 80 20 HIGH In line with the national average (102.7) % Expected standard+ (Re, Wr, In line with the national average % Expected
Page 8: PowerPoint Presentation · 2016-10-17 · FET Rank O LOW 80 20 HIGH In line with the national average (102.7) % Expected standard+ (Re, Wr, In line with the national average % Expected
Page 9: PowerPoint Presentation · 2016-10-17 · FET Rank O LOW 80 20 HIGH In line with the national average (102.7) % Expected standard+ (Re, Wr, In line with the national average % Expected
Page 10: PowerPoint Presentation · 2016-10-17 · FET Rank O LOW 80 20 HIGH In line with the national average (102.7) % Expected standard+ (Re, Wr, In line with the national average % Expected
Page 11: PowerPoint Presentation · 2016-10-17 · FET Rank O LOW 80 20 HIGH In line with the national average (102.7) % Expected standard+ (Re, Wr, In line with the national average % Expected
Page 12: PowerPoint Presentation · 2016-10-17 · FET Rank O LOW 80 20 HIGH In line with the national average (102.7) % Expected standard+ (Re, Wr, In line with the national average % Expected
Page 13: PowerPoint Presentation · 2016-10-17 · FET Rank O LOW 80 20 HIGH In line with the national average (102.7) % Expected standard+ (Re, Wr, In line with the national average % Expected
Page 14: PowerPoint Presentation · 2016-10-17 · FET Rank O LOW 80 20 HIGH In line with the national average (102.7) % Expected standard+ (Re, Wr, In line with the national average % Expected
Page 15: PowerPoint Presentation · 2016-10-17 · FET Rank O LOW 80 20 HIGH In line with the national average (102.7) % Expected standard+ (Re, Wr, In line with the national average % Expected
Page 16: PowerPoint Presentation · 2016-10-17 · FET Rank O LOW 80 20 HIGH In line with the national average (102.7) % Expected standard+ (Re, Wr, In line with the national average % Expected