Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
ED 213 332
potumENT RESUME
/ ' HE 014 79'6
AUTHOR Kramer, RenaTITLE A Profile of the Fall 1979 Freshmen at CUNY.INSTITUTION City Univ. of New 'York, NY. Office of Institutional
Research and Analysis.PUB DATE , Oct 80NOTE , -
% ,AVAILABLE FROM Office of Institutional Reseatch and Analysis, the
City University of New York, NY 10021.
EDRS'PRICE Mk01/PCO2-Plus_ Postage.DESCRIPTOR Admission Criteria; fCollege Applicants; *College
Freshmen; *Community Colleges; DevelopmentalltudiesPrograms; Economically DisadvantagedrEducationallyDisadvantaged; *Enrollment Trends; Full TimeStudents; Higher Education; Open Enrollment; PartTithe Students; *State Universities; Trend Analysis;Tuition; Upper Division Colleges
IDENTIFIERS City Uaiversitvof New York
ABSTRACT /A profile of the f 197- 9' first-time _freshmen at the
City University of New York (CUNY) 4s presented and comparisons aremade withLthe fall 1975 end 1976 classes.In fall 1976 tuition wasimposed for the first time and new admissions criteria were set. In{comparison. to fall 1976 'enrollments, the'number of first-timefreshien enrollment at CUNY in fall -1919 increased 12 percentoverall,'20 percent at the senior colleges and seven percent at thecommunity colleges. At t e.senior%ccilleges, freshman enrollment isstill 37 percent beta, h fall a975 preluition and preadmissioncriteria level, but at =unity colleges, freshman enrollmentat the 1975 level. Intoruation is provided for the specific colleges.At the senior colleges, ;9 percent )4f the regular freshmen meet theadmission criteria., whiletthe copmunit colleges have no high schoolgrade point verage cutoff level req ed for admission. Informationis prOvided freshman enrollment in two programs--SEEK and etllegeDiscovery (CD --which are -designed to help economically,educationally, and ,socially disadvanttaged.stbdents. At CUNY, 99percent of the SEEK/CD freshmen, 91 percent-of the regular seniorcollege freshmen, and 82,percent of the regular community collegefreshmen are full a-time, students. The average full -tine freshman isenrolled.fbr 14-.15 credits and/or equated credits. The averagepart-time freshman is enrolled for seven.credits and/or equatedcredits, including one compensatory/remedial hour at senior collegesand three compensatptyltemedial hours at community colleges. Thenumber of fiestiman applicants to CUNY senior,has declined by 15percent since 1976, while the number applying to CUNT communitycolleges has increased by 12 percent.,(SW)
. , .
*************,*4***************************;**********-*************-******1* Reproactions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made *
.*
, from, the oiriginaltocument. . *-......._
***********************************************************************
F
41
.
.
I
c
A PROFILE OFT
THECUNYFALL 1979:
FRESHMEN A
..,
'PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE THISMATERIAL HAS BEEN GRANTED BY
I.
TO THEEDUCATIONAL RESOURCES
INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC)
f-.)
9
I.......,
r
October, 1980. ,
Office of Institutional Research and AnalysisThe City'Uniersity of ,New York
535 East 80 Street. New -York, N.Y. 10021
t
.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATIONNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF EDUCATION
EDUCATIONAL RESQURCES INFOIIMATIONCENTER (ERIC!LW: document has been f'ep.oduced as
,eCecep 1,0, the demon or oedemata..oodmated ftWoo. changes have been made to erea.ovec ecooduc000 quatrty
Powds 01 +clew 9f of rocols stated CI INS docu
meet do cot r...cessard'i f'floeserd oteK-0t Mt.pofoo or pocy
.,. . '
...
,
sr
Co
SI,
.
*
I
THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YOR'
- 535 East-80 StreetNew York, R.Y. 10021
A PROFILE OF'TflE FALL 1979 FRESHMEN
sATCUNY
by
Rena Kramer
1
f5:
v
;.
October -9801 Office of Iristitutional Research and Analysis.
. Barry KaufMan, University Associate Dean
'
4.4
Introduction
CONTENTS
.4Page
1
Enrollment: F 1975 & 1976 vs. Fall 1979 2,'
Special. Program FretAmen: SEEK and College,Discovery '6
Course Load 7
Fall 1975 & 1976 vs.,Fall 1979 10
4111111
r ,
It
isk
4
.t
TABLES
Table
1, 2, 3: Number of Firstlitite Freshmen Enrolled in CONY
1T15, 1976,,1979, . 1
Changes iin XfrS't-Tithe.Freshman Enrollment: 1976-79
1: Unive4sity-wide Stimmar'11,.2: Senior Colleges .
, .
.
3': Community Colleges. .
..
,
.
4: CUNY First-time Freshmen by College: Fall 1975, 1976,1979
.
'5:, Distributidn of Senior College Freshmen by College
Admissions Averae/Percentile Rank admission
Criteria: Fall 1979 1
6: Regular and Special Program Freshmen at Community '
Colleges: Fall 1979
7,8: High' School Grdduation Date and GED Recipients Regularand Special Program Freshmen: Fall 1979
Senior Colleges '--.8:, Community Colleges
9: Regul4r and Special Program FreshMen by Age: Fall 1979,
10: Initial .Program Registration of tegular and CD Freshmen
at CoMmunity Colleges: 'Fall 1979
11, 12: Comparison of CUNY First-time Freshmen in Regular and
SEEK /CD Programs:' Pall 1976 and Fall 1979
J
11: Senior Colleges12: Community Colleges
.)
13: Attendance Status, Course Load, and Remedial CorseEnrollment of Regular and 'Special Program Freshmen:
Fall 19179
14: Remedial Course Enrollment.of Regular and Special Program
Freshmen by CAA: Fall 1979
15: Number of First-tithe Freshman Applicants' to CUNY through
UAPC: 1975, 1976, 197Changes in First -time Feshman Applicants: 1976'- ,1975
16' ;;'. Percentage of Applicants through UAPC Who enrolled at
CUNY by CAAI Special Program Allocation, and Allocation
to First Choice College: 1975,1976, 1979
1
17: Percent of Applicants. Who,Earolled at CUNY'by College
of Allocation: Fall 1979
A
4
40 Appendift
A, B:
. ,
.4 APPENDICES 1; 4
Percentage Distribution of First-time Freshmenby,High School Rank and College AdmissionsAverage: Fall 1979 Regular Program Freshman
'A: Senior Colleges''B; Community Colleges,
fr
C*:'CUNY'APplicants, and Enrollees by High School: Fall 1979
K
a.
4
4401
-
.10
op,
c.
; .4P-,
1
s.
2
ENROLLMENT: Fall 1975 & 1976 vs. Fall, 1979
The ember of,first-time freshmen enrolled at CUNY in
,Fall 1979 has increased 12% overall, 20% at the senior colleges
and 7% at the community colleges, compared to Fall 1976. At
the senior colleges freshman enrollment is Still 37% below the.
.Fall 1975- pre-tuition, pre-Admission-cria level, but at-
'the community colleges, freshman enrollment is at the-1975 level
(Tables 1, 2, '3) .
*. ) .--, i
/s
.
tills freshman classes at LaGuardia, Baruch, John Jay, and
York have increased at least 48% since 1976. At Bronx, Evers,
Lehman, City, anManhattan, the Eieshman.classes, are smaller
than they were iri 1976' (Table 4).
At.Hostos,Stateri Island-4 Brooklyn, and'IBronx,'at least
20% of the first-time .freshmeh,are "direct" admits4. Overall
9% of the freshmen are "directl: admits,, compared to 7% in' 1975
and 5% in .1976.
=
Women represent 57% of. the freghman class, continuing a trpnd
of increasing, female representation among new enrollees.
4Traditipnally, "direct dmiWare Students whose applications
are processed by a coll $ admissions office rather than by the
University'Applications ocesting Center. Often though, eventhe applications of these direct admits are processed subse=quently by UAPC. The direct adtit's included here ve studentswhoSe.applications either were never procesSed by IJAPC or wereprocessed with a different-social security number and thus did
not match he fie of freshman enrollees. For these "direct"admits, background data such as* high school percentile rank andCAA were not available for this repor4,..-"'1/4,,
.
. '
ENROLLMENT: Fall 1975 & 1976 vs. Fall, 1979
The eumber of.first-time freshmen enrolled at CUNY in
,Fall 1979 has increased 12% overall, 20% at the senior colyleges\
and 7% at the community colleges, compared to Fall 1976. At
the senior colleges freshman, enrollment is still 37% below the'
,Fall 1975 pre- tuiti on, pre-Admission-crite'ria level, but at.
the community colleges, freshman enrollment is at the-1975 level
(Tables 1, 2, 3).
the freshman classes at LaGuardia, Baruch, John Jay, arid
York have increased at least 48% since 1976. At Brbnx, Evers,
Lehman', City, and'Manhattan, the "reshman.classeg are smaller
than they were in 1976' (Table 4) .
At.Hostos,7Stateri Island;, Brooklyn, and'Bronx, at least
20% of the first time freshmen,are '"direct" admits4
. Overall
9%of,thefreshmepare"direct".admits, compared to 7% in' 1975
anti 5f in ,1976.
Women represent 57% of.the freftman class, continuing a trend
of increasing, female representation 'among new enrollees.
4Traditipnally, "direct dmits,-'1are dtudents whose app1ications,
are processed by a coll S admissions office rather than by the..
Unimersity'Applications ocesting Center. Often though, eventhe applications of these direct admits are processed subse-quently by UAPC. The direct adritit$ included here agFe studentswhoSe'applications either were never procesSed by OAPC or wereprocessed with a-different-social security number and thus did
not match he fie of freshman enrollees. For these "d'irect'"admits, background data such as' high school percentile rank andCAA were not available for this repor4t."'N.,
-0"
.-3
At theseniOr colleges 79% of the regular fr'eshmen gieet
the CAA/High' School percentile rank admission criteria5'dmAn ing:
frqm 55% at Jbhj Jay and 58% at York to 93% at the -Co' ilege of
Staten Island and 90% at Baruch (Table 5).
'An additional 14.51 df_the regular freshmen are either
missing CAA and have a High Shoolpercentile rank below the
req4red level, or'are missing percent4e rank and have a CAA.
below the required ldvel. it is possible that the missing/CAA,
f'A. or percentile rank is above the required level. comparison, of ,
)
remedial coursewor 're ired of regular senior college freshmen,
missing CAA and -of tlose,.with a recorded CAA indida that the. -
freshmen missing CAA most closely resemble the group with a CAA/ ,
80 and above (Table,11),"thus supporting the hypothesis-that-..
the group missing CAA would have fallen into the category of- e a
e I
acceptable admission criteria.
For freshmen not meeting the CAA percentile rank admission
criteria,several alternate criteria for adMission can be
suggested: applicants-who have a combined SAT score bf at
leas't 900 mays be admitted without the requi40 CAA and percentile
5 In Fall 1979- of all senior colleges except John 'ay and York, aCAA of 80 or abode 6r a Hig4 School percentile rank of at least66.is'requir6d for regularprogram admission. At John Jay, aCAA of 75' or above or a HS percentile rank ofat least'66 isrequired. At the College of Staten Islpnd, the admission
-criteria refer only to freshMen applying to baccalaureate-
degree programs: -
- 9
-47
AD.A.
"^ t
rank; applicants accepted toSEEK but later xuled ineligible
for the programare oftep retained as regular', students.by the
co4eges; rejected applicants sometimes appeal)to and are 'accepted,
by a college adminiitrative committee. basedon skij.ls assessment
test results and high,school record.; et John Jay, freshmen in
special satellite Programs'are allowed tb enroll :even if they
don 't, meet the'ciiteria.
Far all. senior college freshmen,with:a reported CAA,'the
greatest increase was'among those, with a CAA between 75 and 79
(Table 2)1 . Thisvcan be attributed to the increase in SEEK
freshmen at this level, (to be discussed latex) and to those
'with e high school percentile rank of at least 66 but with a /
CAA less than 8-0.. At the same time, more'than.two7thirds
the regular senior "college freshmen had a CAA of 80 and. above
(Table 11) .
At t 4 community colleges Where there is no CAA cutoff'
level required for admission, and more students come from non-
traditional high scho91 backgrounds (e.g., GER,-,modi4ied pro-.
grams), 23% of the freshmen are missing CAA6, up fror7%
Missing in 1976. Of those recorded, the higher CAAs show d the4 % 4
greater decreases in enrollment.
".60f. theSe 23% misiritj, 12% fall into the "inapplicable"...category,,and 11% are actually missi (i.e.,.data,-if recorded on tran's-cript,' were not transmitted` to UAPC) 4
4
:
Three quarV-rs of the senior collegg freshmen enrolled `in
college. directly, high.school,,bptapared to only half (52%) .
of tbe 'community college fiethmen (Tables 7 and 8) . GE'b reci-'
-
pients account kor.7% of.the senior college freshMen and13% of
L
the community college freshmen.
2 , t
A related finding is -that senior college freshmen, as a.% i
,
I -
group, ere youbger than community college freshmen: 62% of the, 4
senior college freshmen but only 3$% of the community college
'1 freshmen are18.or younger (Table 9).
4
At community colhges!Where students are required -to de-4
clare their degree program uponbaa4nissi6n,_more than two-thirds'
are in.-career programs; a majority of these are in-Business..
College Discovery freihmen tend more, towards career programs
than do regular fresVMen ,(Table l()). Liberal Arts Was among
the top two majors at all community.,c011eges-except,Bronxgrai
New York City. Business was among the top two.majors at ,all
community colleges except'Hostos. Health Services'ranked high
at Bronx, Hostos and Manhattan. Engineering and Science Tech,-
,nology ranked high at New York City.
0
11 .
1r-
i
,
. i
f%
SPECALPROGRAM FRESHMEN! SEEKJiND COLLEGE DiSCOVERY..(CD)7'..
,to
r I
.
There has been,a 57 %3 increase in SEEK fl-eshman enro llment.. . -
, ,
,
and a3.6% rease in CD freshman enrollmenqcompared to Fall0 '4.
1e76/ StE epresent 2,5%- of the- senior college
freshmen, while C freShmen,represent10% cf\pie oOmmuniti. .
c011ege'frehmen tTable 1? and 12). Since the total number of..
SEEK and CD students enrolled e CtJNY is constant and mandated.°. I-.
n . . -, /by theState, the increased freshman SEEIV'CD eriro4ment suggests
-- , - ,,. *
a higher graduation/attrition rate emq,'SEEK/CD-studentsenrolled
'prior to 'Fall 1979.
Special program freshmen account for 47% of the first-time
freshmen, Lehman and for 30% or more of the first-time freshmen
- at city; -Hunter, York, and .Medgar Evers'Colleges (Tables 5 and 6).
Women represent a larger proportion of the special program
freshmen than they do.of the regular program freshmen (Tables 11
'.'and 1-2):
As a result of a change in SEEK/CD eligibility requirements
that took effect in 178, special, program freshmen have higher
A
7 SEEK, at,the senior, colleges, and College Discovery (CD) at thecommunity collegesla're.programs-designedo help' economically,educationally Ad socially disadvantaged students successfully /-
complete-their education at CLINY. These programs'provide'th6students with academic and ,extra-curricular support serVides
.well as financial grants based on individual need.
.
12
A
CAAs in 1979 than they did in 1976: (The,1976-1,97 requirement
was .for.a CAA under 75. The requirement beginning id 1978 Was fbr
Uncler 80, a return to the pre-1976 standard). Only 6% A
._the SEEK freshmen had a CAA 75 or abqve in 1976 compared to 34%
in 1979. -Only 7% of-the CD freshmen had 'a CAA 75 or aboe ink
/ 1976 compared to 26% in 1979.
ligh7schOol percentile rank.
The same'upwanl trend occurs in
(By contrast; regular program
freshmen show a decrease in CAA levelrand high school percentile
rank frOm 1976 to 1979).
V
SEEK and CD freshmen are more likely to enroll direcliky
after, high school than regular program freshmen (Tables 7 and
8). -tiowever, whereas SEEK freshmen are slightly older than
regular senior "collegefreshmen,C,Q freshmen are younger than
regular °community collect: freshmen (Table 9) . This is'because4'
regular community co134e freshmen cOmprisepthe oldest of thee
freshman'groulls.
Ab
44'0A greater proportion of special program freshmen'who have
delayed' college attendance are,GED recipients.
, COURSE LOAD
.At all New York State colleges, twelve credits and/or equated
credits8
(i.e. compensatory or remedial hours) are required
8 Remedial Courses*incrude compepsatory and develcipmental'courseswhich offer credits and equatdd credits, and noncredit remedialcourses which offpr equated credits only. 'These equated credits:count towards full-time status and TAP eligibility (accordingto criteria established by the State-Education Department),
. but not towards credits required for the degree.
13
irk
Assia de Program -(TAP) igibility. At CU14Y, 99%of the
ta
for full-time status an(
-8- i) /
for the Ne-w York State Tuition
SEEK/CD fteshmen, 91%'of the regular seniorcollege freshmen, andot),
. , ,
82% of the regular community, college freshmen arse ;Lill-time- .
(Table 13).
The average Lull -time freshman is enrolled for 14-15
credits and/or equated credits (2-3 credits and /or ,equated credits-4
abovie the required fu14-time ievel). t The number of actual
credits,-though, differsa depending on program and college
level: The average regular senior college freshman is enrolled
for 12 credits and 2.5 compensatory/ remedial hours (equated
credits) and-would be full-time even if one disregarded the
equated credits in remedial courses. The average,regular com-
munity college freshman 'is enrolled for 9. credits arid 6 .
compensatory/remedial hours.. The average SEEK/CD freshman
is enrolled .for .8-9 credits and-8 compensatory/remedial
hours. Thu-s,,about half of the SEEK /CD freshman's program isfr
in non credited remedial coursework compa ed to on11/ 17% of
the regular senior college freshman's an 39% of the regular
'communiey college freshman's: this higher remedial loadCan
be expected to lengthen the amountof time a SEEK/CD freshman
will need to complete the credits required-for graduation.
The average regular part-time freshman is enrolled for
7.credits and/or equated credits, including 1 compensatory/re-,
medial hour at senior colleges and 3 compensatory/remedial
14'
I
.A
hOurs at community college's. The'average part time freshman
theny-is at least a half-time student..
_ .
'4 Among regular program freshmen,.remecal course enrollment
is relipted to CAA. Half of the freshmen with a CAA of-80 or
&bove'take no remedial courses compared to about 39%"of those
with a CAA`below .80 taking no remedial courses. For
students, the ,skills assessment,prOgram,instituted in Fall
1979 may have led to increased enrollment in remedial
programs. .At senior colleges, 66% of the freshmen are enrolled
in at least one"renedial course compared to about 68% 1,n 1976.
At community cccslleges, 79% of the freshmep are enrolled-in at
least one remedial course compared to about 72% in 1976. More
thin 90% of the special program freshmen'enroll in at least one
remedial course, regardless of CAA.
CD freshmen generally enroll in 1 or 2 remedial courses.
SEEK freshmen generally enroll in 3 or more remedial courses.
1'
Controlling .for CAA, reguiar senior college freshmen take fewer,
remedial courses than regular community college freshmen.
r'
4 .4
T
-
V
710-
.APPLICANTS`:` 'Fall 1975 & tj6 vs. Fall 1979
o4 .
.The numbee.oaf freshman applicants to CUNY senior colleges,
has declined by 15:% since 1976 (compare'd to a 20% increase,
.in enrollees,, while- the, number applying to CUNY community
cdllegea'has4ncreased by 12% (compared to a 7% increase in4 ,4471
enrolle60. .
4Although there Were more senior college applicants than
`,community college applic ts, there are more community college
freshman enrollee, than "senior college freshman enrolleeS: This
can be explained in terms of allocation and rate of enrollment.,
More studdhts applied to senior colleges but more were allocate,
to community.colleges.-Also, .those who applied and/or were
allocated to senior 59.11eges were less likely to enroll-than
those allocated, to community colleges (Table 17)..
'New YorleCi.ty public high school graduates' account for 60%' a
of all ippligants (Appendix C). `The proportion of these high.
school graduatefwith a.high CAA hasbeeh declining for the
past severflyears, partially explaining the lower CAA distri-.
bution among CUNY applicants (Table 15). (It should be noted
that the proportion of New York City ptiblic high school gradu-
ates witha.CAA 90 and above who apply to CUNY is greater now
than it,-was-tin 1976, evin though the actual slumbers are smaller).
I ig
16
V
OveTall, the perce ntage of applicants-who enrolled 9 in 1979
(58'%) is higher than it Was in 19.76 (52%), arld the'same as in
Ateach CAA level, students enrolled more often in 1979
than irrt19'76 (14able 16) . However, those with a CAA of 80 on4
above continue to-enroll less °item than those with lower GAAs.
,
Many = more applicants in 1979, were eligible for .a special
program. 'Of all eligibie.students,,87% were allocated to a
. special program in 1979, compared to 37% in 1975 and 91% in
4
E.
1976.
A2p1,icants who were eligible for a special program dn-.
'rolled more often (66%) than those who were not eligible (56%)..
This was true regardless of whether or not they were allocated
.
to a special program, a marked change from past years. (One
reason. for the increased enrollment rate of applicants eligible4_
for but not allocated to a special program may be an incneased
awareness among applicants of sources ofjpancial aid
available, apart from the SEEK/CD programsy A
. .1
Many more applicants'were allocated to their first choice
college in 1979 (81%) than in 1975 (72%) or in 1976 (62%).
Possible explanations of `this increase may be that special
program applicants, now a larger portion of the applicant pool,
9Applicants in 1979 who enrolled as nondegree students, and"direct" admits, are not included in these enrollment figures.
.
'
rr 712-
are no longer allocated through a lottery but by*tteir choice,
t,
of colfege: Also, now that the admissions criteria have been in
place for four'years, applicants are More aware of them, and Are
-applying more often to colleges where they meet. the criteria:
Of tAD hose allocated to.their first choice college, 60% enrolled
in'1979compared to 54% in 1976. Of fhote not allocated to
.their first choice college, 52% enrolled in 1979 compared to
47% ih 1976.
Students applyrng and allocated to coMmunitycolleges
enrolledmore often,than those 'applyingilF and allocated to
senior colleges. , Of all applicants allocated to a CUNY
college, 55' enrolled at their allovtlion:collegeand another
..3% enrolled at a different CUNY college (Table 17).
/
4
THE CITY-UNIVERSITY OF EW YORKOffice of Institutional esea hand Analysis
TABLE 1
,Number of First-time Freshmen Enrolled in LUNY: 1975, 1976, 1979
Changes in First-time Freshman Enrollment: 1976-79
University-wide Summary
' Number of Freshmen-
% Increase(Decrease) % Distribution
1975 4976 1979 1976-1979 1975 1976 1979
LUNY Total 0,368 29,2.83...
32,687 '11.6% 100.0 400.0 100.0
1
SEXMale 19,321 13,519 13,978 3.4 47.9 .46.2 42.8
'Female 21,047 15,764 18,709 52.1 53.8 57.2
100.0 100-.0 10.0.0
'CAA 4
> 80 12,521 9,178
75-79,* 8,103's 5,648
70-74 ,7,770
8,1-27
5 ,789
8,689
(11.4)
2.5
11.7
32.8
21.2
22.0*
33.020.3
27.9
29.8
21.8,401
31,.81
1
Beloir7 9,163 5,222 4,690 (10.2) 24.0 18.8 1742qI.
100.0 100.0 100..
1.
,2,180 '1,459 5,392
% '5.4% 4' SAO 16.5%
.7
'H.S.-PERCENTILE RANK 1
> 66 %ile . 10,490 8,263. 7,095 (14,1) 43.1 45.6 44.0
25-65 10;599,
7 3 .447,023 ( 9.6) 43.5 42.8 ,43.6
< 25 %ile ,3,259 ,104 1,996* 5.1) 13.4 11.6 12:4
.777 100.0 100.0
Missing - 1P 16,020 ,-- 11,143 16, 3
%39,7% ',38,0% , . 50.7%
C
S1:),ECIAL PGM ENROLLENT(Included Above)
SEEK/CD 3,762 3,542 5,258 48,4 9.3 12.1 16.1
,
lInapaicable CAAJincludes missing Ild inapplicable CAAs,
19
i.5/27/80
4 .
A
t 4
THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORKOffice of institutional Research and Analysis
TABLE 2 .
,
Numbei. dfFirst-time Freshmen 'Enrolled in CUNY: 9f5; 1976, 1979 ..
,,Changes in First-time Freslean Enrollment: 1976-1979
Senior Colleges-
Number oaf Freshman
19752 1976 1979
SC Total 20,904 10,982 13,161
SEX,dale 10,260 4,837 5,626
Female 10,644 6,145 j 7,535
CAA 4. ,
> 80 . 9,585 6,748 6,306
75-79 . 4,081 1,357 ".2,553 /
70-74 3,181 1,352 ! 2,219r
Below 70 ,515 1,299 1,142
Inapplicablel- # 542 236 . 941
- % : ` 2.6% 2.1% 7-.1%
H.S. PERCENTILE RANK66.96ile 7,926
25-65 '4,918.
< 25 %ile 1,225
fifssing # 6,835
32.76
5,773 5,,410' .
1,556 ' 2,474
416 57Q
3,237
29.5%
4,707
35.8%
SPECIAL PGM ENROLLNENT(;nCluded Above)
SEEK 2,00 3,285
% Increase(Decrease)
1976-1979'
f9.8f.61
(=
16 .3
,. 226.6
1Inapplicable.CAA includes Missing and. inapplicable CAAs.
2The 'se data exclude Medgar Evers College.
20
.( 6.3),
59.0 ,
37.0
57,4
%.Distribution
1975 1976 ,1970
100.0 100.0 100.
'49.1 44.0) 42.
50'.9 56.0 57
100.0 100.0 100
ik
-47.1 62'.7 51
'20.0' 812.6. 20
15.6 12.6 18
17.3. 12.1 9
100.0 100.0 100
w
56.3 74%5 64
35.0 20.1 29
8.7 5.4 6,
100.0, 100.0 lop
9:9 X9.0, 25
5/27/80
. '
' \
s 5 r I,
TtlEili-UNIVERSITY OF ilE,WYORKOffice ofInstitutional Research and4nalysis
, TABLE
A'
. . . . ..
Number of,Pirst-time.Fr9shmen Enrolled in, .
CUNY:',1975, 1976, 1979
. -, ,e.
dhanges in First -time Freshman Enrollment: 1976-1975If .,
.- .N e
,-. /
-Community Colleges \. '---.,
-.7 4 Increase.(Decrease) .% Distribution
4,) '..
1 CC Total
SEXMaleFemale
4*,
CAA> 80
75 -79
'70-74below 70,
Inapplicablet: //'
. %
Numbei of FreShmen
19752 1976 1979
19,464, 18,301 19,t526
1976-1979 1975 1976 1979
6.7% 160.0 100.0 100.0
. 9,061 8,682 8,352 (, 3.8) 46.6 47.4 42.8
10,403 9,619 11,174 16.2 53.4 52.6 53.2
I 100.0 100.0 ,,100.0.
2,9364,022
5,220
5,648
1,638
8.4%
2,4304,291
6,424
3,923
1,233
6.7%
1,8213,236,
6,470'3,548
4,451 '
22.8%
H.S.PERCENTILE RANK kO
>'666 %ile1
2,564 2,4901 1,685
25-65' f 5,681 6,217 4,549
<'25 vile,
2,054 17688 ' 1,426. .
)ftasing ii 9:185 7,906 11,866
47.2%4Z43.2 % 60.8%.,-
SPECIAL PGMENROLLMNT(Pncludgd;iAbove)uu 1,684 1,45 1,973
(25.0-(24.6)
0.7
( 9.6)
(32.3)
(26.8)
(15.5)
'Inapplicable CAA includes missing andinapplicible CAAs.
2These data include Hedger Evers Collhe.
I'
16.S- 14.2 12.1
22.5 8.2 21.5
29.3 37.6- 42.9
31.7 23.0 23.5
100/0. 100.0 100.0
24.9 24.0 22.0
55.3, 59.8 59.4
19.8 16.2 186.6
100.0 100.0 '100.0
35.6 8.6 8.0 10.1
5/2/80.
THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YOROfficvf Institutional Research and Analysis
TABLE 4A
CUNY First-time Fseshmen'by College: Fall 1975, 1976, 1979
College 1975, .
1976.1979
% Increase(Decrease)l976-1979
# Di t AdmitsInclude ..in 197
.
.
Baruch 1,997 ,1,412 2,202 .55.9% 23
Brooklyn 4,745 ,. 2,290 2,498 9.1 653
City 2,810 1,7'30 1,696 ( 2.0) 117
Hunter 2,532 1,614* , 1,800 11.5 37
Sohn Jay 0Lehman
1,0672,995
'i* 667
917
1,108
894 .
/66.1( 2.5)
17
122
Queens4
3,334 ' 1,988 2,230 12.2 42
York 1,424 364 606 66.5 22
4'
tBronx 3,232 2,526 2,053 (18.7) 765
Evers 675 636 518 (18.6) . 17
Hostos' 642 - 799 801 0.3 161
. Kingsborough 3,010 2,822 2,864 1.5 106'04, LaGuardia 1,562 1,650 2,447 48.3 164
Mgmhattan 1,929 2,331 2,291 ( 1.7) 109
New York City 2,934 2,768 - 3,693 33.4 179
Weensborough 3,024 3,083 3,160 2.5 \ 67
Staten Island2
. 2,456 1,686 1,826 8.3 14.11
f TOTAL 40,368_ 29,283 32,68i 11.6 3,012
. I . .
,,,
Direct Admits3 - 4
Included in Total4
N . 2,868 1,588 3-,0(42
% 7.1% 5.4% 9.2% ,.
. 4Hostos 1979 figures are based on preliMnarj, data.
2A11 1979 freshmen at Stet Island are included here regaildless of program.
`Traditionally, "direct" admits are freshmen whose applications are-processed bya.,college's admissions office rather than by the University Applications Processing
Center. bIten, thoUgh;.even the applications of these direct admits are processed
subsequently by U.PC. The direct admits included here are freshmen whose application:either were never processed by UAPC or were processed with A,differen social securlt:
number and thus Ad not match the file of freshman enrolleegF5/27/80
2
f
Distribu
Rank Adm
THE CITY UNIVERSOffice of Institutional
'ABLE 5
Y OF NEW YORKsearch and Analysis
ion of Senior College Frdshmen by College Admissions Average/Percentilesion Criteria: Fall 1979
Total
College
Regular Freshmen SEEK
Total
Regular
% MeetingCAAnile
Admission \ICriteria'
% Missing -
CAA or %11e2
% Admittedon Alternate
Vrtteria:
Total,
SEEK
% of
'Total N
Baruch, 2,202 '1,617 90.1 31 6.1 585 26:6
Brooklyn 2,498 2,06' / 75.8 19.0 5:2 432 17.3
City 1,696 1,093 81.6 12.0 6'24 603 35.6
Hunter 1,800 tf 1,247 it/ 88.0 6.0 6.0 553 30.7
John Jay 1,108 931 54.6 29.1 16.3 177 16.0
Lehman 894 476 64.3 26,9 8.8 418 46:8
Queens 2,230 1,907 85.; 10.7 3.6 323 14.5.
,Staten Island 127 121 92.6 7.4 0.0 6 0.8,7
York. 606 418-. 57.6 38.8 3.6 18g 31.0
TOTAL. SC 13,161 9,876 79.1 14.5 6,4 3,285 25.0
'In Fall 1979 at all senior colleges.except lOhn Jay and York, a CAA of 80 or above or aHigh School perCentile rank of at least 66 is required for regular program admission. At
John Jay, a CAA of 75 or above or a HS percen4ile rank, of atleast 46 is required.. At York
a CAA of 75 or above 'or a HS percentile rank of at least 661isArequired. At College ofStaten Island the admission criteria refer only to freshmen applying to Baccalaureate degre
dprogram2.. .
2These freshmen are either missing CAA and have a High School percentile rank below therequired lever, or are missing percentile rank and have a CAA below therequired level.It is possible that the missing CAAs or percentile ranks'are above the required level, andif they had been coded, the freshmen would haVe been iocluded in the column of Freshmen
Meeting CAA / %ile MI:fission Criteria. Thus, some of the 14.5% total here might have beenincluded with the 79.1% total of the regular senior college freshmen meeting the CAA/%ileadmisions criteria; others might have been admitted based on alternate criteria (seer
....footnote 3).
3These freshmen have a CAA and High School percentile rank below the required level butare accepted on the ,basis of SAT scores; prior SEEK acceptance; special college adminis-trative action;or a-speciallrogram such as the satellite program John ay.J
4
.2°1
5/27/80
SI" *THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK
Office of Institutional Research and Analysis
'TALE 6
-Regular'and Special Program Freshmen at Community Colleggs: Fall 1979
College
6
.TotalN
Bronx
Everg
Hostos1
Kingsborough
LaGuardia
Manhattan
New York City
Queensborough
Staten Island
2,053
518
801
2,864
2,447
2,291
, 3
3,160
1,699
TOTAL CC.. .
19,526
RegularF eshmen" CD
Total % ofRegular CD 'Total' N
1,755
. 347
795
2,600
. 2,1i2
1,996
3,362
2,994
17.553
1Hostos figures are based on prelimifiary data.
24
4
, ,14.S.
171 33.0
6 0.7
264 9.2
29 , 12.0
295 12,9
331 9.0
165 5.2
148 8.7
1,973 10.1
k
5/27/80
I THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORKOffice .of Institutional Research and Analysis
A- S
TABLE 7
a
High School Graduation Date'and GED Recipients--Regular and Special ProgramFreshmen: Fall 1979
a
k
GED;
Total Total asN of Year
e`
Regular
Senipr-Calleget AP
\./SEEK
Tote).
41:1'
Total
N
GEDas %of Year
Yeas of H.S. Graduation 4
19802 53 0.5 0.0i
. 0
0.0 0.0
1979 7,375 74.6 2.5 2,577 78.5 5.2
1978 461 4.7 28.8 228 6.9 50.4
1977 225 2.3 18.2 76 2.3 36.8*
197j0-76 592 6.0 / 20.4., - 180 5.5 28.9
Y
1960-69 ' 205 2.1 -5 . 8 56. 1.7 12.5.
"Before 1960 115 1.2 1.7 20 0.6 25.0
/ Unknown 850 8.6l((.
5.0
e148 4,5 6.8
140TAL 9,876 100.0 5.4 3,285 100.0 10.7
'GED recipients are included in 'Total N tor Year- of 3.S. Graduation.
21980 High School Graduates accepted in Fa11197.9 in Early Admissiort; programs.
25e
5/27/80
Ira
THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK
Office of:Institutional Research and Anttlysis
TABLE, 8
I.
;
,High School-Graduation Date and GED Recipients- Regular and Special Program
Freshmen: Fall 4979
'1
Yeai of H.S.Graduation
Total
N
1979 . 8,916
1978 1,626
1977 699
1970-76- 2,183
1960-69 846
Before 1960 426
Unknown 2,857
TOTAL 17,553
r
CommunityColleges
Regular
GED1
Total as
% of Year
TotalN
. ,
'CD''
50.8 9.3
'9.3- 35.0
4.0 28.5
12.4 .21.9.
4.8 9.3/
2.4 7.7
16.3 5.3
100.0 13.3
1,339
&
180
38
195
45
151
161
1,973
AGED recipients are included n Total N for Year of H.S. Graduation.
CED
Total - as %
% of Year
6718 4.5
9.1 47.8
1.9 39.5
9.9 27.2
2.3 11.1
0.8 6.7
8.2 11.2
100.0 12.1
5/27/80:
Age
18 or less 6,485
19 -20 1/501
21-25 726
26-40 620
I
)00411.
THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORKOffice of Institutional Research and Analysis
TABLE +it
/Regular and Special Program Freshmen by Age: Fall 1979
4
Senior Colleg6
egular SEEK / a
41 & Above, 141
403
9.,876
% N %
65,6% 1,617 49.2%
0.,
15.2 975- 29:7
7.4 356..._, 10.8 y
6.35
246 7...5'
1.4 I . 23 . 0.7
/4.1 68 2.1
100.0 3,285 100.0
4
#
-N
a
,2"1
a.
Commilnity Colleges
Regular CD
N N %
6,657
3;354
2,723
37.'9%
19.1
15.5
795
/646
278
32.7
14.1
,2,846 16.2 217 11.0
592 = 3.4 24 1.2
1,381 n (y.6
17,553 100.0 1,973 100.0
a
\I
5)27/80
4'*
THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK.Office of.Institutional Research and Analysis
TABLE 10 4
Initial Program Registration of Regular and CD Freshmen at Community Colleges: 1'alL 1979
0WW U
r4al 41 0
E-
N c0anO 0.SPM
Total,CC-N 6,695
% of Regular Freshmen 33.3
% of CD Freshmen 41.8
Br:x
Evqrs
558
24-7
Hostos2 131
Kingsborough 1,233
-LaGuardia 1,094
Manhattan
New York City
Queensborough
Staten Island
965
1,017'
1,023.
427,
"1,802
9.+2
9.6
209
., 0
0
244
351'
320 4 0
N204 ,14001
364 431
1,838
7.7
217
0
0
0
0
2,,700
.14.0
12.6
556
,to
188,
tr,
4-10 in
CJrl .rl N CV0 CO
0 a) '0 0c 1.3
554
2.7
3.8
67
95
86
209 179
.70 2
502 3
517 66
396lb
110. I 189 I 262 56
The program codes arethe. first two digits of
HosticIfigures ore based on preliminary data.
28
the HECIS code as
13,589
68.9
75.5
1,607
342
405
1,865
5,93,7
31.1
24.5
176
396
999
1,517 930
1,790 501
2,805 88$
2,214 946
1,044 655
H
0
19,526
100.0
,100.0
2,053
518
801
2,864
'2,447.
2,291
3,693
A
3,160
1,699
recorded on the Show - Registration tape.
5/-27/80
29.
THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORKOffice of Institutional Research and Analysis
TABLE 11
Comparison of CUNY First-time Freshmen in Regular and SEEK Programs: Fall 1976 and Fall 1979
1,
Number1976
Regular SEEK1979
Regular SEEK
Senior Colleges
% SEEKof Total1976 1979
% Increase(Decrease)1976-1979
Regular SEEK
'"'".
Percent Distribution1976
Regular SEEK .
1979
Regular SEEK
SC Total 8,895 2,087 9,876 3,285 19.0 .25.0 11.0 57,4 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
SEXMale 4,,036 801 4,391 1,235 16.6 22.0 8.8 54.2 45:4 38.4 44.5 .6
Female -4,859 1,286 5,485 2,050 20.9 27.2 12.9 59.4 5,4.6 61.6 55.5 62.4
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
CAA '
80 , 6,713 35 6,201 105 0.5 1:7 (I.6) 200.0 76.9 1.7 67.9
75-79 1,281 76 1,600 955 5.6 37.3 24.9 1153.9* 14.7 3.8 11.5 30.9
70-74 ' 403 949 1,023 1,196 70.2 53.9 153.8 26.p 4.6 46.8 11.2 .38.9
Below 70 333 966 315 827 74.4 72.4 ( 5.4) (14.4) 3.8 7' 47.7 3.4 26.8
100.0 100.0 100.0 f'-100.0
Inlopplicaldi-ii. 165 61 737 204-.1 1'.8% 2.9% 7.5% 6.2%
94,
H.SPERCENTILE RANK> 66 %ile 5,641 132 4,731 576 2.3 10.8 (16.1) 336.4 $5.1 11.8 73.2 28.8
25-65 865 691 1,433 1,144 44.4° 44.4 05.7 65.6 13.1 61.8 22.2 57.4
< 25 %Hol1 121' 295 294 276 70.9 48.4 143.0 ( 6.4) 1.8 26.4 4.6 13.8
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
Missing - fi. , 2,"268 96 3,418 1,2899
--:.%4 25.5%. -46.4% 34.6% ,39.2%
lInapplicdble CAAincludes missing and inapplicable CAAs and CAAs less than 50.
i. -..
* A change in SEEK eligibility.requirements in 1978 raised the minimum eligible CAA from below 75 to
below !b, causing the large increase at this level.
C)
5/27/80
33
-
THE CITiUNrVERSITY -OF NEW YORK .Office of Institutional Research and Analysis
"".
TABLE 12
, -
Comparison of CUNY First-time Freshmen in Regular and CD Programs: Fall 1476 end Fall 1979
Community Colleges
Number
1976.
Regular CD
..e'
. . 1979 ,
Regular b
2
% CD
of Total1976 1979
% Increase(Decrease1976-19
Regular
Percent Distribution1976
Regular CD.1979
RegUlar CD..../
cc Total, 16,846 1,455 '17,553 1,973 8.0 10.1 4.2 35,6 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.00
SEX 1Male 8,147 535 7,697 655' 6.2 7.8 ( 5.5) 22.4 48.4 36.8 43.8 33.2Female 8,09 920 9,&56 1,318 9.6 11.8 3.3 43.3 51.6 63.2 56.2 66.8
1TE-5'100.0. 100.0 100.0
CAA
.29 1,775 46 1.2' 2.5 (26.1) 58.6 15,3 2.1 13.4 2.5> 80 2,401
75679 4,228 63 2,809 427 13.2 (33.6) 577.8 27.0 4.5 21.2 23.4
70-74 5,742 0. 682 5,727 743 10.6 11.5 ( 0.3) 8.9 36.7 48.7 43.2 40.8
Below 70 3,296 627 2,942 606 16.0 17.1 (I0.7) ( 3.3) 21.0 44.7 22.2 33.3
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0ieppliCable':# 1,179
7% 7.0%54
3.7%.4,100'
24.5%1517.6%
H.S.PERCENTILE RANK119
` 521
1,360
3,989
226
659
4.8
8.4 .
14.2
14.2
(42.6)
(30.0)
89.926.5
24.8
59.7
14.0
61.0
20.8
61.2
19. --;//'1
58.2> 66 %ile 2,371
25-65 5,696< 2 %ile 1 ,,475 2134 1,178 248 12.6 17.4 (20.1) 16.4 15.5 25,0 18.0 21.9
100:0 1TTOE 100.0
Missing-4 7 ,'304 602 11,026 84043.4% 41.4% 62.8%" 42.6%
'Inapplicable CAA includes missing and inapplicable CAAs and CAAs less than
32 335/27/80
tTHE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK
. Office of Institutional Research and Analysis(
TABLE 13
Attendance Status, Course Load, and'Remedial Course E rollment
of.Regular and Special Program Freshme4: Fall 1979 '
Percent Full-time
Percent Part-time
Senior Colleges Community Colleges
Total Regular SEEK
13,161 9,876 3,285
Full-time Average Course Load
90,8 99.3
9.2 0.7
t 12.0 8.8
Comp/Rem Hours (Equated.pj
Credits) 1
215 7.6
14.5 16.4
Total Regular CD
19,5.26 17,553 1,973
Comp/Rem as % of Total 17.2% 46.3%
Pat-time Average Course Load
Credits '' 5.8 y 5.0 4.5 5,4
.
N
'Comp/Rem Hours (Equated 1.1 3.3 2.6, 4.5
Credits) .
Total ,6.9 0 7.1 9.9
, l
Comp/Rem as % of Total ,15.9%/391.8% 36,,,.,0____ 45.4%.
81.9 98.5
9.3
6.0
15.31
39.2%
7.7
7.9
15.6
50.6%
Enrolled in at Least One Remedial Course2
8,658, 5,486 3,172
65.8% 5S.5 96.6%15,353 13,521 1,832
78.6% 77.0%. 92.8%.'s
I Equated credits include excess compensatory hours in compensatory courses, all
hours in cess of credit J.:4 developmental courses, and all contact hours in
noncr t remedial courses.
2Rem al courses inoldde compensatory, developmental, or noncredit remedial,
courses. r.. /
..
I
34I
5/27/80
eTHE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK
Office of Itistitutional Research and Analysis
TABLE 14
Remedial CourselEnrollment of Regular and Special Program Freshmen by CAA: Fall 1979
Senior Colleges
Regular SEEK
. ity
Regular CD
_S._
>80 CAA 4,201# Rem Courses:
'105I
1,775
_1.
46
0 3,01'1 49.0 5 4.8 539 30.4 S 10.9
1 1 1,626 26.2 20' 19.0 4449 25.5 12 26:1
2 196 12.8 18 17.1 410.. 23.1 15 32..6
3+ 738 11.9 62 .59.0 377 21:2 14 30.4
75-79 CAA 1,600 953 2,809 427 .
# Rem Courses:
0 502 31.4 43 4.5 663 23.6 34 8.0
1 444 27.8 114 12.0 822 29.3 86 20.1
2 357 22.3 184 194 757 26.9 150 35.1
3+ 297 18.6 612 64.2 567 20.2 157 36,8
70-74 GAA 1,023 1,195 5,727 743
# Rem Courses:0 346 33.8 29 2.4 1,063 18.6 49 6.6
1 263 25.7 118 9.9 1,488 26.0 119 16.0
2 245 23.9 210 17.6 1,875 32.7 272 36,6
3+ 169 16.5 838 70,1 1,301 22.7 303 40.8
< 70 CAA 314 827 2,942 606
# Relp Curses:.
0 ' 81 25:8 22 2.7 434 14.8 44
1 81 25.8 59 7.1 703 23.9 99 16.3
'2 82 26.1 133 16.1. 986 33.5 190 31.4
3+ 70 22.3 613 74.1 819 ,27.8 273 45.0
No CAA 737 204 4,300 15i37 Rem Courses:
0 419 56.8 13i 6.4 1,333 31.6 .6 4.6
1 170 23.1, -14 6.9 964 22.4 28 18.5
2 89 12.1 26 12.7 1,038 24.1 70 46.4
3+ 59 8.0 151 74.0 965 22.4' 47 31.1
1Remedial courses include compensatory, developmental, and non - credit remedial
, courses.
35
5/27/80
Number of F
THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORKOffice of Institutional ch nd Analysis
TABLE 15
-time_Freshman ipplicants to CUNY through UAPC: 1975,1976,1979
Changes in First-time-Freshman
-"1
Applicants: 1976-1975
Number of Appliconts Increase(Decrease)(Decrease)
% Distribution
1975 1976 19792 1976-1979 1975 1976 1979I
CUNY Total 63,927 53,689'. 51,020 ( 5.0) ipo.o 100.0 100.0
Senior Colleges 40,914 33,175 28,049 (15.4)
CAA> 80 18,268 15,448' 12,314 (20.3) 46.2 47.9 46.2 .
75-79 7,95.9 6,501 5,757 (11.4) 20.2 20.2 '21.6
70-74 . 6,971 6,66 5,391 (19.0) 17.7 20.6 20.2
51} -69 6,285 3,643 3,195 (12.3) 15.9 11,3 12.0100.0 100.0 100.0
% Missing 3.5% 2.8% 5.0%
Community Colleges' 23,013 20,514 22,971 12.0
CAA> 80 4,036 3,567 3,289 (-7.8) 18.1 18.1 16.1
75-79 4,829 4,063 4,077 0.3 21.7 20.7 20.0
70-74 6,073 7,499 8,096 8.0 27.2 38.1 39.7
50-69 7,340 4,539 4,946 9.0 '33.0 23.1 24.2
100.0 100.0 100.0
% Missing 3.2% 4.1% 11.2%
'All College of Staten Island applicants included with CCs in 1979. All applicantS
with no First Choice College included with CCs in 1979.
2Tofmaintain comparability, 1979 data e clude 3,012 enrollees who had no-UAPC
application data recorded.
C
-4
1
36
,5/27/8Q
C
0! THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORKOffice of Institutional Research and Analysis
TABLE 16
A.
.
e ercentage of Applicants Through UAPC Who Enrolled at CUNY by CAA, Special Program Alloeetion, and Allocation
to First Choice College: 1975, 1976, 1979 . ,
1
1
.
Total
CAA> 80
75-79
70-74
< 70.
1 9 7 g
'96 Applicants'
.Enrolled At
SC7 CC Total
3I.9 .7- 58.6.
41.2 12.7 53.9
30.5 30.8 6.1
23.0 39.3 62.3
22.3 37.6 59.9
U=== =
#
'Applicants
ALLOCATED 1st CHOICE 45,768
% of All Applicants 71.6%
ALLOCATED OTHER CHOICE (46,159
SPECIAL PROGRAMSEligible & Allocated 5,672Eligible & Not 'Allocated 9,705
Not Eligible 48,550
37
Enrolled
60.7 .
53.6
67.5
58.757.6
==
i 9 7 6
6 ApplicantsEnrolled At
19.0
CC
32.6
33.6 12.8
12.0 40.7
9.3 47.1
11.4 41.5Et =
Total
1 9 7 9
% ApplicantsEnrolled At
SC CC 'Total"7"-
51.6 .23.8 - 34.4 5.8.2
46.4 it 38.5 12.6 51.1
irs
52.7,
A 25.y 35.0 60.3
.
56.4 14.9 49.1 64.0
52.9 14.1 46.0 60.1
Applicants
33,20261.8%
20,486
5,925522
47,171
===sx========7===..----_== =sax ==ss=
#
Enrolled Applicants Enrolled
54.2
47.2
62%949.2
50.2
41,21180.8
9,809
59.6
52.0 .
9;044 65.4
1;295 65.7
40,681 56.3'
5/27/80
Percent of Applicants'
p
TH CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORKOffi e. of Institutional Research and Analysii
TABLE 17
Who Enrolled at CUNY by College of Allocation:
% of Allocated
Fall 19741
/, It At Same At 0ther
College Applicants Allocated College Col lege* Total
Baruch 5,653 3,844 54.1%0(
3 .3% 57.4%
Brooklyn 4,062 3,435 48.3 4 .3 52-6
City 4,276 2,990 47.7 3 .Z 50.9
Hunter . 4,545 3,280 50.5 3 .1 53.6
John Jay 1,627 1,643 63.5 3 .3 66.8
Lehman 1,552 1,182 59.1 2 .6 61.7
Queens 5,544 4,447 45.4 2 .2 47.6
York, 790- 973 55.8 6 .6. 62.4
TOTAL SC 28,049 21,794
Oh
Bronx 1,437 2,128 56.9 3.5 60.4
Evers 575 986 50.2 6.9 51.1
Hostos 918 1,042 60.1' 4.0 64.1
KingsboroughLaGuardia,
3,045
3,521
3,908
3, 63Z c-I 65.3
60.6
3.9
2.7
69.263.3
Manhattan 2,502 3,692 57.6 3.5 61.1
New Ydrk City 4,696 4,774 60.5 2.8 63.3
Queensborough 3;379' 4 79 59.2 2.8 62.0
Staten,Island2 2,128 2,67 5007 4.5 55.2
7
No College Listed3 770 1,514 35.2 35.2
TOTAL CC 22,971 19,226
Senior Colleges% Applicants Who Enrolled 53.2%
% AllocatedWbo Enrolled 54.3%
Community colleges% Applicants Who Enrolled 62.2%
% Allocated Who Enrolddi 61.0%
'Excludes 3,012 freshmen, who were not processed by UAPC.
2 Applicants. , .allocated to Staten Island includ4-here regardldss of prograR.
freshmen with Nostbllege Listed are, included' in the Community College summary.
5/27/80
3,
M1
.
THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORKOffice of Institutional Research ana Analysis
"IP
APPENDIX AA
Percentage Distribution of First-time Freshmen by High School Rank and College
Admissions Average: Fall 1979 Regular Program Freshmen at Senior Colleges
CAA/RANK Baruch
Brook-lyn City Hunier
JohnJay Lehman Queens
Staten.
Island York Total
>80 CAA .
>66 %ile 47.4 33.4 39.1 41.1 10.0. 18.7 46.8 -43.8 6.2 36.0
,J6465 5.4 4.1 - 2.9 6.3 1.4 4.2 6.1 0.8 1.0 4.4
<46A 2.5 3.6 1.1 3.'3 0.9 2.5 .5.1 0.8 0.2 3.0
No Zile 17.2 25.0 25.5 23.2 5.4 30.3 - 14.7 . 33.1 10.8 19.5,, .
.
q,.5-79CAA
, .
>66 %ile 12.7 5.8 8.5 10.2 5.0 7.4 6.7 9.1 2.2 7.8
46-65 1.4 1.8 1.7 1.8 '7.2 3.2 Ah.1.7 0.0 10.3 2.6
<46 . 1.4 1.1 0.7 1.6 4.0 .1.3 Clt.8 0.0 3.6 1.5
No Zile 1.2 3.6 4.4 2.6 9.5 10.7 0.6 '0.0 23.0 4.3
'
70-74CAA* ,
>66 %ile 3.2 1.1.001 2.6 3.0 1.8 01 0,8 5.0 0.2 1.8
46-65 N.0.9 0%7 0.9' 1.0 6.8 0.8 0.3 0.0 1.7 11.3
<46 1.5 0.9 1.4 0.8 '7.5 2.5 0.6 0.0 1 1.7 1.7
No./Ale 0.7 -5.0 5.1 1.4 21.9 5.7 0.2 0.0 . 30.6 5.6
.
<70CAA
>66 Zile 0.4 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1
46-65 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.0 1.5 0.4 ! 0.0 0.0 0:2 0.2
<46 0.7 0.6 1.5 0.7 8.8 0.6 0.3 0.0 0.0 1.4(g
No %ile 0,4 1. 1.4 0.3.
.
6.0 2.3 0.1 0.0 6.4 1.4
No CAA11
,
>66 Zile '1.3 2.9 1.1 1,.0 0.5 '0.2 5.9 , 0.0 0.2 . 2.3
46 -65 , 0.6 '0.6 0.4 ' 0.0 0.5 0.2 *1.8 440 0.0 0.7
<46 0.3 . 7 0.7 0.0 0.1 0.9 0.4'" 1.7 .',- 0.0 0,0, 0.6No %ile 0.7 8.0 0.7 1.6 0.3 7.6 6.3 7.4 1.7,4 '''' 3.8
. s.4
,Total % 100.0 100.0 100.0 190.0 -140.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 . 100.0
.
.
-I
,
Total
Regular 1617 2066 , 1093 1247 931 476 L907 1'21 418 9876
N6/30/80
: 4
THEICITYLUN 'lam" OF NEW YORKrA \ Iffice Of Iiistnion search and Ainalysts
4."APPENDIX ,B
Pgrcentage Dis,tribution.of Firalt.ime Freshmen by High School Rank and College.Admissions,peraget- .Fall 197.9 Regularilrogram Freshmen -at Community Colleges
CAA/RANK>80 CAA7->66, %ile '1.1.
46-65 0.2<46' 0.1No %ile
IBronx EversKings-
Hostos boro LaGC0 BMOC .1 NYCCCQgeens-boro
75- 7'9CAA'
>66.%ile 1.3i
46 -65 0.8. 0.3
NO 'Vac 9.3
70-74CA/k>60 %ile/T6,-65
0.61.5
<46 2.7No %ile 41.1
<70 CAA>66 %ile
<46
No 'ate
No CAAs.66
46-<4
,` No
0.1
0.6
3.2
7.5'
0.6,'0.6
1.422.8
Total % 100.0
Nti
/Regular. 1755
6.6
0.3
0.0
5,5
0.6
1.4
0.6
13.0
0.3
0.6
3.4
.7.8
0.00.0
0%3
%.0
- 100:0
347
o
0.0
0:9 '
0.0.
Q.0' 0.0
p.8 .
4h5.2.
1.1
0.34.5
2.4
7,Z2.7
6.9 2.4D1%4 0.6 0.7
0.3 0.1 0.33.8 [ 15.2
c
0.8 1,. 2.8
3.4 2.0 2.91.4 0.7 1.4
5.7 12.0 7:3
0.0 0.3 1L_0.6 . 0.3 }.0.0 , 7.3 3.3 2.6 I'0.0 7.8 4..6
1.6 17.3 15.7 = 41.1 16.3
6.0 0
1.1
0.54.3 -
2.3\
10.8
1 3.5
8.4_
0.0
1,30,0 ,11.2
0.7. 7.5 fi
c.42.0
2.9 .
90.2.
1$
100.0
795
100.0
2606
0.0 0.1
0.8 -1.1
8.5 - 5.9
6.5 10.5*
't0.7
1..6
30.3
100.0
2152
0.2
0.40.6
11.4
100.0
1996
41
2
1.66.3.
8.2
0.0
3362
0.4
7.4
3:4I
4 15.51
StatenIsland Total
4.4
0.6
0.1
4.5
2.4
,0.4
5.6
6.1
fY.9
r 0.0, i 0.1
0.8 0.8 1.0
8v6i
8.0
0 8.8 ,6.2
'4.6
0.8
0.2
45_
4:6%
1.7
7.7
0.64.5
6:0"21.5
4610:3
0.22.7
100.0
2995
.16
41-:/0.4
0.7
.0.6
32:0
100.0
1551
0.6 .
0.8
1.5,21.7:
100.0.
tHE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORKOffice of institutional Research and Analysis .
APPENDIX C
LUNY Applicants and Eniollees by High School: Fall 1979I v r g,
NEW YORK CITY . Enrolled EnrollId Not / Total'
MANHATTANPUBLIC AC 4, 'SC.
-.
CC
)115JAMIN NKLtN 38 eo 43
CHARLES E. HUGHES 53al
55
GEORGE WASHINGTON foo 65
H.S. OF MUSIC 6 ART 68 34. ..
HUNTER COLLEGE H.S. 13 0
------- .
UL RICHMAN 1,-0 _ 79
140 r. 05,LOUIS BRANDEIS
MARTIN L. KING JR. 43 39 .
. 0
SEWARD PARK
STUYVESANT
WASHINGTON IRVING
BRONXADLAI E. STEVENSON
* .
BRONX H.S. OP SCIENCE
CHRISTOPHER COLUMBUS
DeWITT CLINTON
EVANDER CHILDS
HARRY S. TRUMAN
HERBERT H. LEHMAN
JAMES MONROE
JOHN E. KENNEDY
MORRIS
THEODORE ROOSEVELT
WALTONA
WILLIAH HA TAFT
BROOKLYNABRAHAM LINCOLN
d.27 ' 117 '
* 4179 12
87 100
86 68 -
79 10
152 y 52
-...
- 71 63 '
4 $6 9j
.97 105
95 69
45 65
$
138 ' 85
1 53 . 66 /
114 106
*48 42
92 100A ,
Iii 149
130Y A GIRLS.BR YN TECHNICAL
,
0°
83
07
176
96-
, 89.
-- 124.
BUSHWICK i r: 79 ' 72
CANARSIE 124 144
-----EASTERNIIIISTRICT 38 , 60
EDWARD R. MURR6W :* 67 101
'`RASMt1 HALL, 180 ,201
Enrolled Applicants
85 166.
79 , . 187
107 fie272
174 276
34 47
.
119 304
251 496
65 147
178 P 422
VI.246 337
..
158 345
99 253
.1197 N 286
154 358
81 . 74 215
123 . 301 '
166 36S
ITI .. 277
'116 216
180 403
86 205
116 336
61 - 151
112 . 30%
146 413
117 296
103 e;59
400 700
73 . 224
'130 398 .
.
68 166
156 324
194 ' 575
12
BROOKLYN(cont"4FORT HAMILTON
FRAMLIN D ROOSEVELT
APPENDIX C, p. 2
0 I 0 '
Enrolled Enrolled Not,
Total
SC CC . Enrolled Applicants
100 ,oI34 173 407
..
90 i '136 114
FRANKLIN K. LANE
GEORGE H..WINGATE
,JAMES MADISON
,--J06-DENEY
45
89
84
.. 134"\,,-
'
53
109
115
156
-JOHN JAY i 93 f29
LAFAYETTE 65 150
NIDWOOD 120 126
NEW UTRECHT 84 ,124
' PROSPECT HEIGHTS 76 96
SAMUEL TILDEN 126 124
SHEEPSHEAD BAY, 97 165
SOUTH SHdE 189. 204
THOMAS JEFFERSON 76 82
QUEENS
-'
ANDREW JACKSON 66 99
4
AUGUST MARTIN 43 42
BAYSIDE 122 182
BEACH CHANNEL. - 105 122
BENJAMIN N. CARDOZO 114 106
FAR ROCKAWAY 60 78
FLUSHING 115 132
AP
OREST HILLS 109 1100
RANCIS LEWIS 101 0137
GROVER CLEVELAND - 135 191
0HILLCREST 112 98
JAMAICA 131 158 ,
JOHN ADAMS(
110' 125 12,
JOHN BOWNE 171 181
IfLONG ISLAND CITY ,149 110
MARTIN VAN BUREN 126 181
NEWTOWN 236 232,
RICHMOND HILL .74 78
SPRINGFIELD GARDENS 87 94
WILLIAM C. BRYANI 1,62 1781
el s
340
53 151
164 362
144 343
224 514
1.18 340
118 . 333
161 407'
84 292
4 266
160 410
161 423,
268 , 651
425551117-=--
124 289
79 164
272 576
166 393
205 425
111 249
116 363
199 415
175 413
190 516
183 393
262 551 so
141 389
216 568
164 475 .
217 524
236 704
87 239
113 294
161 501
10
STATEN ISLAND,CURTIS .
NititiONP
APPENDIX C, p. 3 -
Enrolled Enrolled Not Total
21 49Applicants
147SC. CC ' 'Enrolled
4U?. 14Th 45 241,r
PORTPORT RICHMOND 37. , 87 LI
21 245
24- .82, 90. 196SUVeN E. WAGNER
TOTTEMILLE 44 125 150 319 o
-,... .
tied YORK CITY
PUBLIC VOCATIONALMANHATTAN
54 67 105 228per 6 DESIGN '6
CHELSEA . '
18- 32 33 83
n
,'FASHION INDUSTRIES72 50 174
64 76 60 20014', 4431ABEL D. BACON
.1.1
-..MANHATTAN' VOC.6 TECR. .4,4 14 '22 38 74
1 .MURRY BERGIRAUM
6744 63 88. 218
' ... '
NEW YORK PRINTING 31 40- 41 112
1.46` 193 167 516NORMAN THOMAS 3-0.,,
PARK WEST(FOOD,4,WARITIME) 0_..0?1:r____;._41 44 120
BRONX =r
ALFRED E. SMITH25 29 76
...<4
GRACE H. DODGE 83 :0\
.o.:
SAMUEL GoMPERS
,.- 1r, -
JAN ADDAMS45,. 4%.
34
. .. -
BROOKLYN '.' #.
ALEXANDER RAMILTON .27
AUTOMOTIVE.. 28
: .,
93 93 269
26 27
133
70
32' 33 92
34 48 .110
CLARA BARTON', ; 138 132 114 384
)
EAST NEW YORK15 24' 23 62
ELI 1.411ITN
.%
EY50 111 72 213
GEORGE WESTINGHOUSE '36 79 81 196
*71aSARAH J. liAtE
4/ 74 192
WM. E. GRADY 26 85 68" it3 179
UM. H. MAXWELL 48 0, 47 35 13
QUEENS '
AVIATION ...1
JAMAICA VOCATIONAL
QUEENS'.
THOMAS-A. EbTSON
STATEN ISLANDRALPH McKEE.
64 J5 106 245; ,-......
2
26 48
$,
66 . 99
!.
4 21
4
1 3ofe
'45 119
)"1141114 88 233
22 47
1
f
APPENDIX C, p. 4 .
ALTERNATIVE HIGH SCHOOLS,
I
EnrolledSC _
#
Enr011ed+CC
'to
#
Not
Enrolled
. TotalApplicants
CITY AS SCHOOLs
. 14 14 25 53
HARLEM PREP Ze . 18 18 10 46
01LOWER EAST SIDE PREY 18 10 29 57
PARK BAST 10 8 '13 31
SATELLITE ACADEMIES 17 14 15 46.
TOTAL NEW YORK CITYPUBLIC SCHOOLS 8,211 9,352 12,298 29 861
NEW YORK CITY NON-P UBIC 11,710 1,839 3,660 7,2094
GED 4 ' 801 2,165 1:235 4,201
OUT OF CITY/OTHER . 1,406 4,191 4,152 9,749
c.
