96
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station General Technical Report PNW-GTR-709 June 2007 Potential Vegetation Hierarchy for the Blue Mountains Section of Northeastern Oregon, Southeastern Washington, and West-Central Idaho David C. Powell, Charles G. Johnson, Jr., Elizabeth A. Crowe, Aaron Wells, and David K. Swanson

Potential Vegetation Hierarchy · boundaries were established by using aquatic rather than terrestrial ecological units (Maxwell et al. 1995, Seaber et al. 1987). Province M332, “middle

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Potential Vegetation Hierarchy · boundaries were established by using aquatic rather than terrestrial ecological units (Maxwell et al. 1995, Seaber et al. 1987). Province M332, “middle

United StatesDepartment ofAgriculture

Forest Service

Pacific NorthwestResearch Station

General TechnicalReportPNW-GTR-709

June 2007

Potential Vegetation Hierarchyfor the Blue Mountains Sectionof Northeastern Oregon,Southeastern Washington,and West-Central IdahoDavid C. Powell, Charles G. Johnson, Jr., Elizabeth A. Crowe,Aaron Wells, and David K. Swanson

Page 2: Potential Vegetation Hierarchy · boundaries were established by using aquatic rather than terrestrial ecological units (Maxwell et al. 1995, Seaber et al. 1987). Province M332, “middle

The Forest Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture is dedicated to theprinciple of multiple use management of the Nation’s forest resources for sus-tained yields of wood, water, forage, wildlife, and recreation. Through forestryresearch, cooperation with the States and private forest owners, and manage-ment of the national forests and national grasslands, it strives—as directed byCongress—to provide increasingly greater service to a growing Nation.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all itsprograms and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability,and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion,sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all orpart of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Notall prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who requirealternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print,audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voiceand TDD).

To file a complaint of discrimination write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights,1400 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider andemployer.

AuthorsDavid C. Powell is a silviculturist, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service,

Umatilla National Forest, 2517 SW Hailey Avenue, Pendleton, OR 97801; Charles

G. Johnson, Jr. (deceased) was an area ecologist, U.S. Department of Agriculture,

Forest Service, Wallowa-Whitman National Forest, P.O. Box 907, Baker City, OR

97814; Elizabeth A. Crowe is a vegetation ecologist, U.S. Department of the

Interior, National Park Service, Greater Yellowstone Inventory and Monitoring

Program, Box 173492, 229 AJM Johnson, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT

59717; Aaron Wells is a postdoctoral associate, Department of Ecology, 310 Lewis

Hall, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59715; David K. Swanson is an

area ecologist, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Wallowa-Whitman

National Forest, P.O. Box 907, Baker City, OR 97814.

Cover Photo CreditsAll photos by David C. Powell, show examples of the cool moist (top), warm dry

(middle), and cold dry (bottom) upland forest plant associatioin groups.

Page 3: Potential Vegetation Hierarchy · boundaries were established by using aquatic rather than terrestrial ecological units (Maxwell et al. 1995, Seaber et al. 1987). Province M332, “middle

AbstractPowell, David C.; Johnson, Charles G., Jr.; Crowe, Elizabeth A.; Wells,

Aaron; Swanson, David K. 2007. Potential vegetation hierarchy for the Blue

Mountains section of northeastern Oregon, southeastern Washington, and west-

central Idaho. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-709. Portland, OR: U.S. Depart-

ment of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 87 p.

The work described in this report was initiated during the Interior Columbia Basin

Ecosystem Management Project (ICBEMP). The ICBEMP produced a broad-scale

scientific assessment of ecological, biophysical, social, and economic conditions for

the interior Columbia River basin and portions of the Klamath and Great Basins.

The broad-scale assessment made extensive use of potential vegetation (PV) infor-

mation. This report (1) discusses certain concepts and terms as related to PV, (2)

describes how a PV framework developed for the broad-scale ICBEMP assessment

area was stepped down to the level of a single section in the national hierarchy of

terrestrial ecological units, (3) describes how fine-scale potential vegetation types

(PVTs) identified for the Blue Mountains section were aggregated into the midscale

portion of the PV hierarchy, and (4) describes the PVT composition for each of the

midscale hierarchical units (physiognomic class, potential vegetation group, plant

association group).

Keywords: Potential vegetation, Blue Mountains, potential vegetation hierarchy,

plant ecology, potential vegetation type, plant association group, physiognomic

class, potential vegetation group.

Page 4: Potential Vegetation Hierarchy · boundaries were established by using aquatic rather than terrestrial ecological units (Maxwell et al. 1995, Seaber et al. 1987). Province M332, “middle

Contents1 Introduction

2 Ecological Unit Hierarchy

3 Naming Conventions

5 Potential Vegetation Concepts

7 Potential Versus Existing Vegetation

9 Potential Vegetation Classification

11 Potential Vegetation Hierarchy

11 Fine-Scale Hierarchical Units

14 Midscale Hierarchical Units

15 Temperature-Moisture Approach

15 Physiognomic Classes

16 Temperature-Moisture Matrix (Plant Association Groups)

25 Potential Vegetation Groups

32 Step-Down Process for Developing Midscale Hierarchical Units

33 Concerns About Subjectivity

36 Glossary

43 Species List

51 Acknowledgments

52 References

64 Appendix

Page 5: Potential Vegetation Hierarchy · boundaries were established by using aquatic rather than terrestrial ecological units (Maxwell et al. 1995, Seaber et al. 1987). Province M332, “middle

1

Potential Vegetation Hierarchy for the Blue Mountains Section of Northeastern Oregon…

IntroductionA distant summer view of the Blue Mountains shows a dark band of coniferous

forest occurring above a lighter-colored grassland zone. Each of the two contrast-

ing areas seems to be homogeneous, and the border between them appears sharp

(Powell 2000).

A closer view reveals great diversity within each zone and borders that are

poorly defined: herbaceous communities and stands of deciduous trees are scattered

throughout the coniferous forest, and the species of dominant conifer changes from

one site to another (Powell 2000).

At the foot of the Blue Mountains, fingers of forest and stands of tall deciduous

shrubs invade the grassland zone for varying distances before becoming progres-

sively less common and eventually disappearing altogether (Powell 2000).

This vegetation pattern demonstrates that the Blue Mountains are actually

broken up into a myriad of small units, many of which repeat in an intricate,

changing pattern. Making sense of this landscape mosaic is possible by using a

concept called potential vegetation (PV) (Powell 2000).

Potential vegetation is defined as the community of plants that would become

established if all successional sequences were completed, without interference by

humans, under existing environmental conditions including edaphic, topographic,

and climatic factors (Hall et al. 1995).1 Potential vegetation, the theoretical end-

point of plant succession in the absence of disturbance, is used to characterize

biophysical settings and their associated potential natural communities (Daubenmire

1968, Zerbe 1998).

This report describes a potential vegetation hierarchical analysis process

initiated during the Interior Columbia Basin Ecosystem Management Project

(ICBEMP). The ICBEMP began in January 1994 when the Chief of the USDA

Forest Service (FS) and the Director of the USDI Bureau of Land Management

(BLM) signed a charter; it directed that an ecosystem-based strategy be developed

for management of FS and BLM lands within the project area.

The ICBEMP project area includes the U.S. portion of the interior Columbia

River basin east of the crest of the Cascade Mountains in Oregon, Washington,

Idaho, and western Montana, along with adjacent parts of Wyoming, Nevada,

California, and Utah (some of the adjoining area includes portions of the Klamath

and Great Basins). It contains over 145 million acres (58.7 million hectares), about

1 Scientific and technical terms are defined in the glossary.

The Blue Mountainsare actually brokenup into a myriad ofsmall units, many ofwhich repeat in anintricate, changingpattern.

Page 6: Potential Vegetation Hierarchy · boundaries were established by using aquatic rather than terrestrial ecological units (Maxwell et al. 1995, Seaber et al. 1987). Province M332, “middle

2

GENERAL TECHNICAL REPORT PNW-GTR-709

76 million acres (30.8 million hectares) of which are federal lands administered by

the FS and BLM (Quigley and Arbelbide 1997, Quigley et al. 1996). At the time it

was conducted, it was the largest assessment of its kind in the world (Quigley and

Cole 1997).

The ICBEMP produced a framework for ecosystem management (Haynes et al.

1996) and a broad-scale assessment of ecological, biophysical, social, and economic

conditions in the project area (Quigley and Arbelbide 1997, Quigley et al. 1996).

The broad-scale assessment made extensive use of PV information (Jensen et al.

1997).

This report has four objectives:

• Discuss certain concepts and terms relating to PV–a glossary of terms is

provided on page 36.

• Describe how the PV hierarchical framework developed for the ICBEMP

broad-scale assessment was stepped down to the level of a single section

(the Blue Mountains) in the national hierarchy of terrestrial ecological

units.

• Describe how fine-scale potential vegetation types (PVTs) identified for the

Blue Mountains section were aggregated into midscale PV hierarchical

units.

• Describe the PVT composition for each of the midscale hierarchical units

(physiognomic class, potential vegetation group, plant association group) in

the Blue Mountains PV hierarchy.

Ecological Unit Hierarchy

Land and water areas have been classified into broad-scale hierarchies of aquatic

and terrestrial ecological units (Bailey 1998, Maxwell et al. 1995). “The primary

purpose for delineating ecological units is to identify land and water areas at

different levels of resolution that have similar capabilities and potentials for man-

agement” (Cleland et al. 1997).

Understanding different levels of resolution (e.g., scales) is central to an

understanding of ecological capabilities and potentials because ecosystem compo-

nents (composition, structure, and function) are scale dependent (Levin 1992).

Eight levels are included in a national hierarchy of terrestrial ecological units,

as adopted by the USDA Forest Service: domain, division, province, section, sub-

section, landtype association (LTA), landtype, and landtype phase (Cleland et al.

Understandingdifferent levels ofresolution (e.g.,scales) is central toan understanding ofecological capabili-ties and potentials.

Page 7: Potential Vegetation Hierarchy · boundaries were established by using aquatic rather than terrestrial ecological units (Maxwell et al. 1995, Seaber et al. 1987). Province M332, “middle

3

Potential Vegetation Hierarchy for the Blue Mountains Section of Northeastern Oregon…

1997, McNab and Avers 1994). This report describes how a hierarchical PV process

was implemented for a single section in the interior Pacific Northwest (section

M332G, the Blue Mountains).

The broad-scale scientific assessment of the interior Columbia River basin and

portions of the Klamath and Great Basins (Quigley and Arbelbide 1997, Quigley et

al. 1996) included all or part of 7 provinces and 23 sections; only portions of some

provinces or sections were included in the ICBEMP assessment area because its

boundaries were established by using aquatic rather than terrestrial ecological units

(Maxwell et al. 1995, Seaber et al. 1987).

Province M332, “middle Rocky Mountain steppe–coniferous forest–alpine

meadow,” is located in the Northwestern United States and includes parts of

Oregon, Washington, Idaho, and Montana (Bailey 1998).

In the terrestrial ecological unit hierarchy, province M332 occurs in the “dry”

domain and within a mountainous variant of the “temperate steppe” division

(specifically, the “temperate steppe regime mountains”) (McNab and Avers 1994).

Section M332G, the Blue Mountains, is the westernmost of seven sections in

province M332 (Bailey 1998, McNab and Avers 1994).

At a regional scale, the Blue Mountains section consists of a series of mountain

ranges occurring in a southwest to northeast orientation, extending from the

Ochoco Mountains in central Oregon, the southwestern portion of the section, to

the Seven Devils Mountains in west-central Idaho, the northeastern portion of the

section (fig. 1).

This west to east orientation allows the Blue Mountains to function ecologically

and floristically as a transverse bridge between the Cascade Mountains province to

the west, and the main portion of the middle Rocky Mountains province to the east

(Bryce and Omernik 1997, Rydberg 1916).

Naming Conventions

Potential vegetation types are traditionally referenced by using scientific plant

names (e.g., Pseudotsuga menziesii/Spiraea betulifolia), common plant names

(e.g., Douglas-fir/birchleaf spiraea), alphanumeric acronyms (e.g., PSME/SPBE2),

and database codes (e.g., CDS634). (See “Species List” for common and scientific

names and appendix tables 8 and 9 for potential vegetation types and codes.) When

referring to a potential vegetation type in this report, the following naming conven-

tions are used:

Page 8: Potential Vegetation Hierarchy · boundaries were established by using aquatic rather than terrestrial ecological units (Maxwell et al. 1995, Seaber et al. 1987). Province M332, “middle

4

GENERAL TECHNICAL REPORT PNW-GTR-709

• Species in the same life form are separated with a dash (e.g., subalpine fir-

whitebark pine), whereas species in different life forms are separated with

a slash (e.g., grand fir/queencup beadlily).

• Alphanumeric acronyms are derived from scientific plant names: the first

two letters of the genus name are combined with the first two letters of the

species name and capitalized (e.g., ABGR for Abies grandis). If more than

one species has the same code, then a number is added to differentiate

between them (e.g., PIMO3 for Pinus monticola). The acronyms associated

with the initial Blue Mountains potential vegetation classifications (Crowe

and Clausnitzer 1997, Johnson and Clausnitzer 1992, Johnson and Simon

1987) were generally derived from Garrison et al. (1976).

• Nomenclature for scientific plant names was revised when the U.S.

Department of Agriculture adopted a new national taxonomy called the

PLANTS database (USDA NRCS 2004). In this report, the PLANTS codes

are used for any plant species included in a Blue Mountains potential

vegetation classification (Crowe and Clausnitzer 1997, Johnson 2004,

Johnson and Clausnitzer 1992, Johnson and Simon 1987, Johnson and

Swanson 2005, Wells 2006).

Figure 1—The Blue Mountains section. In the context of the national hierarchical framework of terrestrial ecological units (Clelandet al. 1997), the Blue Mountains are classified as section M332G; the Blue Mountains are the westernmost section in provinceM332: middle Rocky Mountain steppe–coniferous forest–alpine meadow (Bailey 1998, McNab and Avers 1994).

Page 9: Potential Vegetation Hierarchy · boundaries were established by using aquatic rather than terrestrial ecological units (Maxwell et al. 1995, Seaber et al. 1987). Province M332, “middle

5

Potential Vegetation Hierarchy for the Blue Mountains Section of Northeastern Oregon…

• For compatibility with Blue Mountains classifications published before the

PLANTS database, the plant species codes used with the original reports,

along with any PLANTS synonyms and synonym codes for these species,

are provided in the species list (“R6 code”). Synonyms refer to instances

where the PLANTS database has changed the original plant name to a new

one. For example, Stipa occidentalis was the scientific name for western

needlegrass in the original reports (Crowe and Clausnitzer 1997, Johnson

and Clausnitzer 1992, Johnson and Simon 1987), but Achnatherum

occidentale occidentale is the PLANTS scientific name for this species now

(USDA NRCS 2004).

• All common names are shown in lower case letters except for proper names

(e.g., Sandberg’s bluegrass; Rocky Mountain maple).

• Ecoclass codes, used for recording PVTs on field forms and in databases,

are described in Hall (1998, as supplemented); ecoclass codes for PVTs

described in Blue Mountains potential vegetation classifications are

provided in appendix tables 8 and 9.

Potential Vegetation ConceptsThe genetic characteristics of a plant species allow it to be adapted to a specific

range of environmental conditions, which is called its ecological amplitude

(Daubenmire 1968). Ecological amplitude controls how a plant species interacts

with physical site factors such as altitude (elevation), aspect, geology, and soil type.

Together these factors create the underlying foundation, a geomorphic template,

upon which the biological landscape is constructed.

Physical and other abiotic factors govern belowground ecosystem processes

(such as nutrient cycling) and create aboveground gradients in productivity, struc-

ture, and composition. Does this mean that the abundance or distribution of a

potential natural community is controlled exclusively by elevation, rock type, or

any other individual factor? In general, the answer to this question is “no.”

Potential vegetation can be thought of as the algebraic sum of all environmental

factors influencing the flora of an area (Daubenmire 1976). The physical factors of

a plant’s environment interact to form a temperature and moisture regime influ-

enced primarily by gradients of elevation, slope steepness and configuration, aspect,

and geologic parent materials and their resulting soils (Kruckeberg 2002, Meurisse

et al. 1991, Swanson et al. 1988, Westveld 1951). These site factors interact by

complementing or counteracting each other, so any individual factor has limited

influence by itself.

Potential vegetationcan be thought of asthe algebraic sum ofall environmentalfactors influencingthe flora of an area.

Page 10: Potential Vegetation Hierarchy · boundaries were established by using aquatic rather than terrestrial ecological units (Maxwell et al. 1995, Seaber et al. 1987). Province M332, “middle

6

GENERAL TECHNICAL REPORT PNW-GTR-709

The concept of complementary factors is illustrated by the situation where a

plant community occurs on different aspects as elevation changes. At a low eleva-

tion within its distribution, a plant community may grow on a steep, north-facing

slope because this combination of environmental factors results in cooler and

moister conditions than are typical for the elevation. At intermediate portions of its

elevational range, a plant community tends to be at an optimum and it then occurs

on zonal soils and moderate aspects (east- or west-facing exposures). At high eleva-

tions, it may be found on a steep, south-facing slope because this combination of

environmental factors results in warmer and dryer conditions than typically prevail

for the altitude (Blumer 1911, Daubenmire 1952).

This example demonstrates that plant species seldom have the same ecological

indicator status wherever they occur. Land managers should be able to interpret the

indicator status of the plant species and communities with which they work

(Westveld 1951). This skill is particularly important when working with mixed-

species communities (Powell 2000).

The presence of ponderosa pine in stands trending toward domination by grand

fir, for example, may indicate only that one or more mature ponderosa pines

happened to be within seed dissemination distance when the last wildfire or other

disturbance event occurred. How would a land manager come to that conclusion?

Shade-intolerant tree species such as ponderosa pine can colonize sites that are

moister than they can hold onto when facing competition from shade-tolerant

species such as grand fir; ponderosa pine and grand fir occurring together on the

grand fir/twinflower plant association is an example of this situation for the Blue

Mountains section (Johnson and Clausnitzer 1992).

This species occurrence pattern suggests that varying proportions of ponderosa

pine and grand fir may not indicate changes in temperature or moisture relation-

ships (ponderosa pine indicating warm and dry microsites; grand fir indicating cool

and moist microsites), but may instead represent an expected progression in a post-

disturbance sere where early-seral ponderosa pine is gradually being replaced by

late-seral grand fir (Daubenmire 1966).

This example illustrates that the proportion of ponderosa pine in a mixed-

conifer stand may have limited indicator value with respect to a site’s temperature

and moisture status, but it might be useful as an indicator of how much time has

passed since the last wildfire or other disturbance event with sufficient intensity to

initiate a cohort of early-seral tree species (Daubenmire 1966).

Page 11: Potential Vegetation Hierarchy · boundaries were established by using aquatic rather than terrestrial ecological units (Maxwell et al. 1995, Seaber et al. 1987). Province M332, “middle

7

Potential Vegetation Hierarchy for the Blue Mountains Section of Northeastern Oregon…

Potential vegetation implies that over long periods and in the absence of

disturbance, similar types of plant communities (PVTs) will develop on similar

sites. Knowing which PVT will develop is useful because it indicates ecological site

potential (Cook 1996, Westveld 1951) and helps predict ecosystem response to

disturbance processes such as wildfire (Brown et al. 2004, Crane and Fischer 1986,

Franklin and Agee 2003, Hann et al. 2005) and invasive species (Despain et al.

2001, Weaver et al. 2001).

Potential vegetation offers insights about inherent productivity and other

vegetation-site relationships (Meurisse et al. 1991), is valuable for projecting plant

succession pathways (Beukema et al. 2003, Clausnitzer 1993, Kurz et al. 2000),

and helps put the existing vegetation patterns of an area into an ecological context

(Daubenmire 1966, 1976).

Potential Versus Existing Vegetation

The occurrence of ponderosa pine and grand fir in mixed stands demonstrates an

important difference between potential vegetation and existing vegetation. Potential

vegetation describes the floristic composition produced in a disturbance-free envi-

ronment and under existing climatic conditions, and it accounts for internal or

autogenic changes occurring during plant succession (soil changes, nutrient cycling,

etc.).

Classifying vegetation by assuming that disturbance is absent, might seem

irrelevant in the interior Columbia River basin where disturbance processes are

ubiquitous (Hann et al. 1997, Losensky 1994), but this classification concept

identifies the most competitive plant species in the context of existing climate,

and they can then function as useful indicators of a site’s ecological potential

(Pfister and Arno 1980).

Because classification describes the plant composition associated with recent

historical and existing climate, the composition and distribution of PVTs is ex-

pected to change as climate changes. Climate change modeling for the broad-scale

scientific assessment of the interior Columbia River basin and portions of the

Klamath and Great Basins predicted that with a doubling of atmospheric carbon

dioxide levels, the Thuja plicata/Clintonia uniflora (western redcedar/queencup

beadlily) plant association would occur in the Blue Mountains section even though

it does not occur there now (Jensen et al. 1997).

In the pine-fir, mixed-species plant community example described above,

ponderosa pine will not ultimately prevail because grand fir is more competitive

in the absence of disturbance. When considering the PV concept established by

Daubenmire (1968), Pfister and Arno (1980), and many others, this means that

Potential vegeta-tion offers insightsabout inherent pro-ductivity and othervegetation-siterelationships.

Page 12: Potential Vegetation Hierarchy · boundaries were established by using aquatic rather than terrestrial ecological units (Maxwell et al. 1995, Seaber et al. 1987). Province M332, “middle

8

GENERAL TECHNICAL REPORT PNW-GTR-709

grand fir is a more useful indicator species than ponderosa pine because the classifi-

cation objective is to identify the dominant composition associated with climate and

other abiotic conditions, not with stochastic factors such as disturbance (McCune

and Allen 1985a, 1985b). In other words, this concept recognizes that plant asso-

ciations are distinct entities varying in response to biophysical site factors, not just

random groupings of plants brought together by chance (Westveld 1951).

In the interior Pacific Northwest, fire and other disturbance processes usually

intervene to prevent development of climax plant communities (Agee 1993, 1998;

Habeck and Mutch 1973), but knowledge about life history traits and vital at-

tributes allows us to predict a site’s potential floristic composition (Huston and

Smith 1987, Noble and Slatyer 1980, Roberts 1996). This is why the concept is

referred to as potential vegetation—certain site characteristics (the physical and

abiotic environment), in combination with the presence or absence of diagnostic

indicator plants, provide clues about the potential composition of an area’s vegeta-

tion (the climax plant community) (Powell 2000).

Potential vegetation is an indicator of the environmental gradients controlling

vegetation dynamics—it reflects how shade-tolerant and shade-intolerant tree

species develop and interact in mixed forests (Smith and Huston 1989); the rate

at which ecosystems produce and accumulate biomass (Daubenmire 1976); and

the potential impact of fire, insects, pathogens, and other disturbance processes

on forest composition and structure (McDonald 1991, Powell 2005, Schmitt and

Powell 2005, Steele et al. 1996).

The management implications of plant succession, forest growth, and other

ecosystem processes are predictable (within limits) because they can be related to

PV, and sites with similar PV tend to respond to disturbance processes in a similar

way (Cook 1996, Daubenmire 1961). For this reason, the “fire regime condition

class” protocol (Hann et al. 2005) and several other assessment or mapping pro-

cesses (Comer et al. 2003, Küchler 1964) have adopted a PV concept explicitly

incorporating natural or historical disturbance.

Existing vegetation differs from PV because it represents conditions as they

exist today—what a land manager finds on the ground and deals with on a daily

basis (Brohman and Bryant 2005). Historically, natural resource management was

based on classifications of existing vegetation (e.g., Eyre 1980, Shiflet 1994).

Although maps displaying existing vegetation provide valuable information about

current composition and structure, they supply little insight about site productivity

and other management implications (Daubenmire 1973, Deitschmann 1973,

Westveld 1951).

Page 13: Potential Vegetation Hierarchy · boundaries were established by using aquatic rather than terrestrial ecological units (Maxwell et al. 1995, Seaber et al. 1987). Province M332, “middle

9

Potential Vegetation Hierarchy for the Blue Mountains Section of Northeastern Oregon…

This means that the two classification approaches—PV and existing vegeta-

tion—tend to be used in different ways and for different purposes: existing vegeta-

tion is well suited for meeting operational needs because it represents “what is”

(current conditions), whereas PV is ideally suited for planning and assessment

processes because it represents “what could be” (ecological site potential) (Powell

2000, Westveld 1951).

Potential Vegetation Classification

Ecosystems are complexes of living organisms interacting with each other and their

environment. There are many kinds of ecosystems but not an infinite number, and

ecologists have learned that similar ecosystems occur repeatedly across the land-

scape (Klinka and Carter 1980). Vegetation is a readily observed component of an

ecosystem. It can be used to characterize floristic communities and to help map

aquatic and terrestrial ecological units (Bailey 1996).

The process of delineating and characterizing floristic communities is called

vegetation classification. Potential vegetation is classified by using a taxonomic

approach of sampling stands with climax or late-successional plant composition.

These classifications are based on the concept that a community of plants proceeds

through successional pathways to a potential climax association that is typical or

characteristic of a particular biophysical environment (Pfister and Arno 1980).

Grouping similar PVTs results in a taxonomic hierarchy. For the Blue Moun-

tains section, PV has been organized as one hierarchy consisting of two integrated

portions—the fine-scale hierarchical units are useful for operational or project-level

planning (Emmingham et al. 2005, Hall 1989), and the midscale hierarchical units

are suitable for ecosystem analysis at the watershed scale (REO 1995) and for other

strategic purposes (Johnson et al. 1999) (fig. 2).

The midscale taxonomic units have been particularly useful for ecological

mapping. Plant association groups resulting from a temperature-moisture classifica-

tion framework (Jensen et al. 1997, Powell 1998), along with information about

geomorphology, geologic rock types, soil complexes, and other abiotic compo-

nents, were used as the PV component or element when mapping landtype associa-

tions (LTAs) for national forests of the Blue Mountains section during 2003 and

2004 (Winthers et al. 2005).

Landtype association is one of the categorical classification units within the

national hierarchy of terrestrial ecological units (Cleland et al. 1997, McNab and

Avers 1994). The mapping unit for LTAs is based primarily on landforms, surficial

geology, and midscale taxonomic units for soils and PV (Winthers et al. 2005).

Existing vegetationis well suited formeeting operationalneeds because itrepresents “whatis,” whereas poten-tial vegetation isideally suited forplanning and as-sessment processesbecause it repre-sents “what couldbe.”

Page 14: Potential Vegetation Hierarchy · boundaries were established by using aquatic rather than terrestrial ecological units (Maxwell et al. 1995, Seaber et al. 1987). Province M332, “middle

10

GENERAL TECHNICAL REPORT PNW-GTR-709

Figure 2—Hierarchy of potential vegetation (PV) for the Blue Mountains section (figure adaptedfrom Powell 2000). The PV taxonomic units have been organized as two integrated portions of aPV hierarchy. The fine-scale hierarchical units are described in PV classification reports and theirassociated keys (Crowe and Clausnitzer 1997, Johnson 2004, Johnson and Clausnitzer 1992,Johnson and Simon 1987, Johnson and Swanson 2005, and Wells 2006). Potential vegetationtypes (PVTs) provide a link between the fine-scale and midscale portions of the PV hierarchybecause PVTs are aggregated to form plant association groups.

Page 15: Potential Vegetation Hierarchy · boundaries were established by using aquatic rather than terrestrial ecological units (Maxwell et al. 1995, Seaber et al. 1987). Province M332, “middle

11

Potential Vegetation Hierarchy for the Blue Mountains Section of Northeastern Oregon…

During mapping of LTAs for the Blue Mountains section, it was found that fine-

scale PV units (particularly PVTs as defined in this report) were at too fine a scale

to be useful, but that midscale units (particularly potential vegetation groups)

provided a reasonable level of discrimination when delineating LTA mapping units

in the field.

Predictive mapping of PV has many useful applications for ecosystem planning

and management (Deitschmann 1973, Kelly et al. 2005). A recent classification-

tree modeling project used geographic information system (GIS) layers for topog-

raphy, slope position, geology and soils, solar radiation, and precipitation and

topographic moisture in a map-overlay computer processing environment (Bailey

1996) to predict plant associations, plant association groups, and vegetation series

for a large study area in northeastern Oregon. The midscale plant association

groups (and the other predicted units) were then mappable in GIS. Note that for

this modeling project, all predicted units of PV pertained exclusively to upland

types because riparian types function at a different (finer) scale, and it is seldom

possible to discriminate between them in a modeling or GIS context (Kelly et al.

2005).

Potential Vegetation HierarchyFine-Scale Hierarchical Units

Literally thousands of plant species call the Blue Mountains home (Botanical

Resources Group 2004, Hanson 2000). The vegetation of a region tends to reflect

the types of habitat that are available to it, and the Blue Mountains provide a

diversity of habitat owing to variation in landforms, topography, climate, soils,

slope exposure, geologic parent materials, and other abiotic factors. The almost

limitless combination of these abiotic factors offers a vast array of habitats where

plants can become established and grow (Clarke and Bryce 1997).

Each unique combination of abiotic factors results in a slightly different tem-

perature and moisture regime. Ecological amplitude controls how plants interact

with abiotic factors. As plant occurrence and distribution are influenced primarily

by temperature and moisture, when abiotic factors vary enough to modify the

temperature and moisture regime, they cause a change in plant composition

(Sampson 1939).

In the Blue Mountains section, temperature and moisture regimes vary some-

what predictably with changes in elevation, aspect, and slope exposure (Kelly et al.

2005). This variation across biophysical settings is consistent with our current

Each unique combi-nation of abioticfactors results in aslightly differenttemperature andmoisture regime.

Page 16: Potential Vegetation Hierarchy · boundaries were established by using aquatic rather than terrestrial ecological units (Maxwell et al. 1995, Seaber et al. 1987). Province M332, “middle

12

GENERAL TECHNICAL REPORT PNW-GTR-709

understanding of the environmental tolerances (life history traits and vital at-

tributes) for the dominant plant species (McCook 1994, Powell 2000).

One objective of PV classification is to delineate relatively homogeneous units

of biophysical environment. Each biophysical environment is characterized by its

potential floristic composition. The biophysical environments of an area are de-

scribed in PV classifications (e.g., Crowe and Clausnitzer 1997, Johnson 2004,

Johnson and Clausnitzer 1992, Johnson and Simon 1987, Johnson and Swanson

2005, and Wells 2006, for the Blue Mountains section).

The PV classifications not only define the fine-scale PV hierarchical units of an

area (Pfister and Arno 1980), but they also provide dichotomous keys to aid in their

identification.

Series—

The highest level of the fine-scale portion of the PV hierarchy is based on the

dominant climax plant species and is called the series (fig. 2). The subalpine fir

series, for example, includes every plant association where subalpine fir is presumed

to be the dominant tree species at climax. The series unit of the PV hierarchy is

assumed to reflect macroclimatic conditions at the site scale.

Potential vegetation types—

The middle level of the fine-scale portion of the PV hierarchy (fig. 2) is defined by

using one or more species from the dominant (overstory) vegetation layer and one

or more indicator plants from the subordinate (undergrowth) layer. This hierarchical

unit is the PVT. The PVTs include three of the taxonomic units described in PV

classifications for the Blue Mountains section: plant associations,2 plant community

types, and plant communities.

Plant associations—

Plant associations are named for their dominant overstory and undergrowth plants,

such as the Abies grandis/Clintonia uniflora plant association (abbreviated ABGR/

CLUN2).

2 For much of the Western United States, the lowest level of the fine-scale portion of thepotential vegetation hierarchy is called a “habitat type” instead of a plant association.There is actually little distinction between the two terms because a habitat type refers tothe physical environment (land area) having the capability to support a particular plantassociation; habitat types are named for the climax plant communities (plant associations)they can support. In other words, habitat types are land-mapping units; plant associationscan be thought of as their attributes, legend items, or map labels (Alexander 1985).

Page 17: Potential Vegetation Hierarchy · boundaries were established by using aquatic rather than terrestrial ecological units (Maxwell et al. 1995, Seaber et al. 1987). Province M332, “middle

13

Potential Vegetation Hierarchy for the Blue Mountains Section of Northeastern Oregon…

From an ecological perspective, it is assumed that the dominant (overstory)

species of a plant association reflects macroclimate at a site scale, whereas the sub-

ordinate indicator plants represent an area’s microclimate and soils. For the Abies

grandis/Clintonia uniflora plant association, Abies grandis is assumed to reflect the

macroclimatic regime, whereas Clintonia uniflora is responding to microclimatic

conditions.

The land area capable of supporting a plant association (the habitat type) is

considered to be fairly homogeneous in terms of its growing environment, and it

integrates site-scale variability in elevation, soil, geology, and other abiotic factors

in such a way that the same climax overstory and understory vegetation will

eventually be produced (Davis et al. 2001).

Plant community types—

Some late-seral vegetation types persist on the landscape and have been referred to

as plant community types in PV classifications (Johnson and Clausnitzer 1992). This

taxonomic unit includes vegetation that might be climax but about which there is

uncertainty. Plant community types occur repeatedly across the landscape, but they

are considered to be successional to one or more plant associations.

Plant community types are named in much the same way as plant associations:

they use a binomial name consisting of one or more of the dominant (overstory)

species and one or more of the subordinate (undergrowth) plants.

For plant community types, the undergrowth indicator plants are typically

assumed to represent the climax composition, whereas the overstory dominants are

often early- or midseral species that have not yet been supplanted by late-seral or

potential natural community species (Hall et al. 1995).

Early- or midseral tree species can dominate plant community types when

their longevity exceeds that of the late-seral, shade-tolerant species, or because they

possess a set of life history traits (such as thick bark and low bark resin) (Flint

1925, Starker 1934) rendering them particularly well suited to a stand-maintaining

disturbance regime such as frequent surface fire (McCook 1994).

Plant communities—

Some PV classifications also include a taxonomic unit called plant communities.

Vegetation types designated as a plant community have no particular successional

(seral) status. Generally, plant communities are vegetation types with a limited

distribution in the geographical area covered by the classification, or they were

described by using such a small number of sample plots that it is not possible to

infer their true successional status (Johnson and Clausnitzer 1992).

Page 18: Potential Vegetation Hierarchy · boundaries were established by using aquatic rather than terrestrial ecological units (Maxwell et al. 1995, Seaber et al. 1987). Province M332, “middle

14

GENERAL TECHNICAL REPORT PNW-GTR-709

Phases—

The lowest level of the fine-scale portion of the PV hierarchy is called a phase,

which represents a subdivision of a plant association (fig. 2). Phases reflect minor

environmental differences within a plant association and are named for an indicator

species, such as the pinegrass phase of the Douglas-fir/birchleaf spiraea plant

association (PSME/SPBE2, CARU phase) (Steele et al. 1981).

Although commonly used elsewhere in the Rocky Mountains (Alexander

1985, Pfister and Arno 1980), phases were not included in PV classifications for

the Blue Mountains section (Crowe and Clausnitzer 1997, Johnson 2004, Johnson

and Clausnitzer 1992, Johnson and Simon 1987, Johnson and Swanson 2005, Wells

2006).

Midscale Hierarchical Units

Once an area has been classified and mapped into PVTs (plant associations, plant

community types, plant communities), this fine-scale information can then be ag-

gregated to make it useful for midscale analysis and assessment purposes (Bergeron

and Bouchard 1984). Although aggregation has potential pitfalls (oversimplification

often does more harm than good), it can provide clarity and foster strategic think-

ing: “we must learn how to aggregate and simplify, retaining essential information,

without getting bogged down in unnecessary detail” (Levin 1992).

Potential vegetation information is useful for a variety of midscale purposes

such as these:

• Land and resource management planning (Emmingham et al. 2005, Hall

1989)

• Ecosystem analysis at the watershed scale (REO 1995)

• Bioregional assessments such as the Interior Columbia Basin Ecosystem

Management Project (Johnson et al. 1999)

• Assessing wildland fire susceptibility (Graham et al. 2004, Huff et al.

1995, Peterson et al. 2005, Powell 2005, Schmidt et al. 2002)

• Characterizing suggested tree stocking levels (Cochran et al. 1994, Powell

1999).

To support the strategic needs described above, fine-scale PV information

for the Blue Mountains section was aggregated into midscale PV hierarchical units

(fig. 2).

Although aggrega-tion has potentialpitfalls, it can pro-vide clarity andfoster strategicthinking.

Page 19: Potential Vegetation Hierarchy · boundaries were established by using aquatic rather than terrestrial ecological units (Maxwell et al. 1995, Seaber et al. 1987). Province M332, “middle

15

Potential Vegetation Hierarchy for the Blue Mountains Section of Northeastern Oregon…

Midscale PV information provides an ideal framework for characterizing the

dynamic nature of plant succession and for explicitly recognizing the need to man-

age vegetation at a broad geographical scale. A midscale approach also results in

more congruence between inherent patterns of ecological site potential and native

disturbance regimes (Everett and Lehmkuhl 1999).

The midscale portion of the PV hierarchy has three levels: physiognomic

classes, potential vegetation groups (PVGs), and plant association groups (PAGs).

As PVTs (e.g., plant associations, plant community types, plant communities) are

aggregated to form PAGs, PVTs provide a link between the fine- and midscale

portions of the PV hierarchy (fig. 2).

Temperature-Moisture Approach

At a broad scale, PV varies along an environmental gradient reflecting the interac-

tion of landform, topography, climate, geology, and other macro-scale factors

(Daubenmire 1968, 1976). At a fine scale, however, the environmental gradient is

controlled by site-level factors such as elevation, slope steepness and configuration

(convex, flat, concave), and slope direction (aspect) (Jensen et al. 1997).

In its simplest form, a midscale environmental gradient can be defined by using

two characteristics integrating environmental factors: temperature and moisture.

This classification framework relies on the premise that physiognomically dominant

species, such as those used to define a fine-scale hierarchical unit called the series

(see fig. 2), indicate a temperature gradient and that subordinate species, such as

shrubs and herbs found on the forest floor in a conifer-dominated community,

indicate a moisture gradient.

By using temperature and moisture as a classification framework, PVTs can be

arrayed in two-dimensional space, showing not only their relationship to relative

gradients of temperature and moisture but also to other PVTs found in the same

geographical area.

Physiognomic Classes

Although the temperature-moisture matrix approach is intuitively attractive, it is

difficult to adequately represent the vegetation diversity of the Blue Mountains and

other large landmasses in a single temperature-moisture matrix. After reaching that

conclusion, we refined the temperature-moisture approach for the Blue Mountains

section in a three-step process:

Page 20: Potential Vegetation Hierarchy · boundaries were established by using aquatic rather than terrestrial ecological units (Maxwell et al. 1995, Seaber et al. 1987). Province M332, “middle

16

GENERAL TECHNICAL REPORT PNW-GTR-709

1. The vegetation was initially divided into three broad physiognomic classes:

forest, shrub, and herb (herb includes both grasses and forbs).3 This division

was made to acknowledge that temperature and moisture gradients differ for

each class—what is considered warm in a forest setting differs from warm for

herb environments.

2. The initial division into three physiognomic classes resulted in too much varia-

tion to adequately meet midscale needs, particularly with respect to moisture.

Therefore, the initial classes were divided again to better represent their mois-

ture variability. This step established upland and riparian variants for each of

the original classes: upland and riparian forest, upland and riparian shrub, and

upland and riparian herb.

3. A final division was made to separate a woodland physiognomic class (consist-

ing of western juniper plant associations) from the remainder of the upland

forest physiognomic class. This division was made to explicitly recognize that

juniper woodlands represent important differences in vegetation structure and

function when compared with other PVTs having forest physiognomy.

This process resulted in establishment of seven physiognomic classes, each of

which has its own temperature-moisture matrix:

• Upland forest, upland woodland, upland shrub, and upland herb;

• Riparian forest, riparian shrub, and riparian herb.

Temperature-Moisture Matrix (Plant Association Groups)

By delineating multiple categories of temperature, and by doing the same for

moisture, a temperature-moisture matrix was developed for use with the physiog-

nomic classes. This matrix framework was initially developed for a broad-scale

scientific assessment of the interior Columbia River basin and portions of the

Klamath and Great Basins; the matrices were used when characterizing biophysical

environments of the basin (Jensen et al. 1997, Reid et al. 1995).

The temperature-moisture matrix provides a convenient ecological framework

for aggregating fine-scale PVTs into what is termed plant association groups.4 This

3 This stratification into three physiognomic classes was identical to the potentialvegetation classification framework developed for the interior Columbia River basinscientific assessment (Jensen et al. 1997, Reid et al. 1995).4 Sometimes, plant association groups (PAGs) are assumed to be equivalent tobiophysical environments. This assumption is seldom true because the delineation criteriafor biophysical environments typically incorporate physical or abiotic factors such asgeology or geomorphology explicitly (Jensen et al. 1997), whereas PAGs are delineatedby using potential vegetation types only.

The temperature-moisture matrixprovides a conve-nient ecologicalframework for ag-gregating fine-scalePVTs into what istermed plant asso-ciation groups.

Page 21: Potential Vegetation Hierarchy · boundaries were established by using aquatic rather than terrestrial ecological units (Maxwell et al. 1995, Seaber et al. 1987). Province M332, “middle

17

Potential Vegetation Hierarchy for the Blue Mountains Section of Northeastern Oregon…

means that each cell in a temperature-moisture matrix represents a unique plant

association group. Plant association groups are the lowest level of the midscale

portion of the PV hierarchy established for the Blue Mountains section (fig. 2).

For the upland physiognomic classes, a 4-row by 4-column (16-cell) matrix

consisting of four categories of temperature (cold, cool, warm, hot) and 4 catego-

ries of moisture (wet, very moist, moist, dry) was adopted (table 1).5

Assignment of upland PVTs to physiognomic temperature-moisture matrices is

presented for the four upland physiognomic classes (table 2).

For the riparian physiognomic classes, three categories of soil moisture were

found to be more ecologically relevant than the four classes of ambient (site)

moisture used for the upland types (Manning and Engelking 1997). Therefore, the

riparian matrices used four categories of temperature (the same ones used for the

upland matrices) and three categories of soil moisture.

The three categories of riparian soil moisture were identical to the three

“riparian moisture phases” used when developing riparian PV settings for a broad-

scale scientific assessment of the interior Columbia River basin and portions of the

Klamath and Great Basins (Jensen et al. 1997, Manning and Engelking 1997).

For the riparian physiognomic classes, a 4-row by 3-column (12-cell) matrix

consisting of four categories of temperature (cold, cool, warm, hot) and three

categories of soil moisture (high, moderate, low) was adopted (table 3).

Table 1—A 16-cell matrix of temperature and moisture categories

Moisture

Temperature Wet Very moist Moist Dry

Cold Cold wet Cold very moist Cold moist Cold dry

Cool Cool wet Cool very moist Cool moist Cool dry

Warm Warm wet Warm very moist Warm moist Warm dry

Hot Hot wet Hot very moist Hot moist Hot dry

A 4 by 4 temperature-moisture matrix like the one shown here was used for the four physiog-nomic classes included in table 2: upland forest, upland woodland, upland shrub, and uplandherb. The fine-scale potential vegetation types occurring in an upland physiognomic class wereassigned to one, and only one, of the class’s matrix cells. Individual matrix cells (warm dry, coolwet, etc.) are used as plant association groups in the midscale portion of the potential vegetationhierarchy (fig. 2).

5 The temperature and moisture categories are roughly analogous to soil temperatureand moisture regimes used for soil taxonomy and classification (Meurisse et al. 1991,USDA NRCS 2003), but they are not directly comparable category to category. Soiltemperature and moisture regimes are defined by using criteria that incorporate timingof moisture and temperature with respect to plant growing seasons.

Page 22: Potential Vegetation Hierarchy · boundaries were established by using aquatic rather than terrestrial ecological units (Maxwell et al. 1995, Seaber et al. 1987). Province M332, “middle

18

GENERAL TECHNICAL REPORT PNW-GTR-709

Table 2–Potential vegetation groups (PVG), plant association groups (PAG), and potential vegetation type(PVT) codes and common names for upland physiognomic classes

PVG PAG PVT code (PLANTS code) PVT common name

ABLA/MEFE subalpine fir/rusty menziesiaABLA/RHAL2 subalpine fir/white rhododendronABLA-PIEN/LEGL subalpine fir-Engelmann spruce/Labrador teaABLA-PIEN/MEFE subalpine fir-Engelmann spruce/rusty menziesiaABLA-PIEN/RHAL2 subalpine fir-Engelmann spruce/white rhododendronABLA-PIEN/SETR subalpine fir-Engelmann spruce/arrowleaf groundsel

ABGR/ARCO9 grand fir/heartleaf arnicaABGR/VASC grand fir/grouse huckleberryABLA/CAGE2 subalpine fir/elk sedgeABLA/FEVI subalpine fir/green fescueABLA/JUDR subalpine fir/Drummond’s rushABLA/JUPA (AVALANCHE) subalpine fir/Parry’s rush (avalanche)ABLA/JUTE subalpine fir/slender rushABLA/POPH subalpine fir/alpine fleeceflowerABLA/POPU3 subalpine fir/Jacob’s ladderABLA/STOC2 subalpine fir/western needlegrassABLA/VASC subalpine fir/grouse huckleberryABLA/VASC-PHEM subalpine fir/grouse huckleberry-pink mountainheathABLA/VASC/POPU3 subalpine fir/grouse huckleberry/Jacob’s ladderABLA-PIAL/ARAC2 subalpine fir-whitebark pine/prickly sandwortABLA-PIAL/CAGE2 subalpine fir-whitebark pine/elk sedgeABLA-PIAL/FEVI subalpine fir-whitebark pine/green fescueABLA-PIAL/JUCO6 subalpine fir-whitebark pine/mountain juniperABLA-PIAL/JUCO6-ARNE subalpine fir-whitebark pine/mountain juniper-pinemat manzanitaABLA-PIAL/JUDR subalpine fir-whitebark pine/Drummond’s rushABLA-PIAL/JUPA-STLE2 subalpine fir-whitebark pine/Parry’s rush-Lemmon’s needlegrassABLA-PIAL/POPH subalpine fir-whitebark pine/alpine fleeceflowerABLA-PIAL/POPU3 subalpine fir-whitebark pine/Jacob’s ladderABLA-PIAL/RIMO2/POPU3 subalpine fir-whitebark pine/mountain gooseberry/Jacob’s ladderABLA-PIAL/VASC/ARAC2 subalpine fir-whitebark pine/grouse huckleberry/prickly sandwortABLA-PIAL/VASC/ARCO9 subalpine fir-whitebark pine/grouse huckleberry/heartleaf arnicaABLA-PIAL/VASC/CARO5 subalpine fir-whitebark pine/grouse huckleberry/Ross’ sedgeABLA-PIAL/VASC/FEVI* subalpine fir-whitebark pine/grouse huckleberry/green fescueABLA-PIAL/VASC/LECOW2 subalpine fir-whitebark pine/grouse huckleberry/Wallowa LewisiaABLA-PIAL/VASC/OREX subalpine fir-whitebark pine/grouse huckleberry/little ricegrassABLA-PIAL/VASC-PHEM* subalpine fir-whitebark pine/grouse huckleberry-pink mountainheathABLA-PIEN/LUHI4 subalpine fir-Engelmann spruce/smooth woodrushABLA-PIEN/POPU3 subalpine fir-Engelmann spruce/Jacob’s ladderABLA-PIEN/VASC-PHEM subalpine fir-Engelmann spruce/grouse huckleberry-pink mountainheathPIAL/ARAC2 whitebark pine/prickly sandwortPIAL/CAGE2 whitebark pine/elk sedgePIAL/FEVI whitebark pine/green fescuePIAL/JUCO6-ARNE whitebark pine/mountain juniper-pinemat manzanitaPIAL/LUAR3 whitebark pine/silvery lupinePIAL/RIMO2/POPU3 whitebark pine/mountain gooseberry/Jacob’s ladderPIAL/VASC/ARAC2 whitebark pine/grouse huckleberry/prickly sandwortPIAL/VASC/ARCO9 whitebark pine/grouse huckleberry/heartleaf arnicaPIAL/VASC/LUHI4 whitebark pine/grouse huckleberry/smooth woodrushPICO(ABGR)/VASC/CARU lodgepole pine(grand fir)/grouse huckleberry/pinegrass

Col

d up

land

fore

st

Col

d m

oist

Col

d dr

y

Page 23: Potential Vegetation Hierarchy · boundaries were established by using aquatic rather than terrestrial ecological units (Maxwell et al. 1995, Seaber et al. 1987). Province M332, “middle

19

Potential Vegetation Hierarchy for the Blue Mountains Section of Northeastern Oregon…

Table 2–Potential vegetation groups (PVG), plant association groups (PAG), and potential vegetation type(PVT) codes and common names for upland physiognomic classes (continued)

PVG PAG PVT code (PLANTS code) PVT common name

PICO(ABLA)/CAGE2 lodgepole pine(subalpine fir)/elk sedgePICO(ABLA)/STOC2 lodgepole pine(subalpine fir)/western needlegrassPICO(ABLA)/VASC lodgepole pine(subalpine fir)/grouse huckleberryPICO(ABLA)/VASC/POPU3 lodgepole pine(subalpine fir)/grouse huckleberry/Jacob’s ladderPIFL2/JUCO6 limber pine/mountain juniperPSME/RIMO2/POPU3 Douglas-fir/mountain gooseberry/Jacob’s ladderTSME/VAME mountain hemlock/big huckleberryTSME/VASC mountain hemlock/grouse huckleberry

ABGR/COOC grand fir/goldthreadABLA/ARNE/ARAC2 subalpine fir/pinemat manzanita/prickly sandwortABLA/CARU subalpine fir/pinegrassABLA/XETE subalpine fir/beargrassABLA-PIMO3/CHUM subalpine fir-western white pine/prince’s pinePICO/CARU lodgepole pine/pinegrassPICO(ABGR)/ARNE lodgepole pine(grand fir)/pinemat manzanitaPICO(ABGR)/CARU lodgepole pine(grand fir)/pinegrass

ABGR/TABR2/CLUN2* grand fir/Pacific yew/queencup beadlilyABGR/TABR2/LIBO3 grand fir/Pacific yew/twinflowerABLA/STAM2 subalpine fir/claspleaf twistedstalk

ABGR/GYDR grand fir/oakfernABGR/POMU-ASCA2 grand fir/swordfern-gingerABGR/TRCA grand fir/false bugbanePICO(ABGR)/ALSI3 lodgepole pine(grand fir)/Sitka alderPOTR5/CAGE2 quaking aspen/elk sedge

ABGR/CLUN2 grand fir/queencup beadlilyABGR/LIBO3* grand fir/twinflowerABGR/VAME* grand fir/big huckleberryABGR/VASC-LIBO3 grand fir/grouse huckleberry-twinflowerABGR-CHNO/VAME grand fir-Alaska yellow cedar/big huckleberryABLA/ARCO9* subalpine fir/heartleaf arnicaABLA/CLUN2* subalpine fir/queencup beadlilyABLA/LIBO3* subalpine fir/twinflowerABLA/TRCA subalpine fir/false bugbaneABLA/VAME* subalpine fir/big huckleberryABLA-PIEN/ARCO9 subalpine fir-Engelmann spruce/heartleaf arnicaABLA-PIEN/CLUN2 subalpine fir-Engelmann spruce/queencup beadlilyABLA-PIEN/LIBO3 subalpine fir-Engelmann spruce/twinflowerABLA-PIEN/TRCA subalpine fir-Engelmann spruce/false bugbanePICO(ABGR)/LIBO3 lodgepole pine(grand fir)/twinflowerPICO(ABGR)/VAME lodgepole pine(grand fir)/big huckleberryPICO(ABGR)/VAME/CARU lodgepole pine(grand fir)/big huckleberry/pinegrassPICO(ABGR)/VAME/PTAQ lodgepole pine(grand fir)/big huckleberry/bracken fernPICO(ABGR)/VAME-LIBO3 lodgepole pine(grand fir)/big huckleberry-twinflowerPICO(ABLA)/VAME* lodgepole pine(subalpine fir)/big huckleberryPICO(ABLA)/VAME/CARU lodgepole pine(subalpine fir)/big huckleberry/pinegrass

Coo

l dry

Moi

st u

plan

d fo

rest

Coo

lve

ry m

oist

Coo

l moi

stC

ool

wet

Col

d up

land

fore

st Col

d dr

y

Page 24: Potential Vegetation Hierarchy · boundaries were established by using aquatic rather than terrestrial ecological units (Maxwell et al. 1995, Seaber et al. 1987). Province M332, “middle

20

GENERAL TECHNICAL REPORT PNW-GTR-709

Table 2–Potential vegetation groups (PVG), plant association groups (PAG), and potential vegetation type(PVT) codes and common names for upland physiognomic classes (continued)

PVG PAG PVT code (PLANTS code) PVT common name

ABGR/ACGL* grand fir/Rocky Mountain maple

ABGR/ACGL-PHMA5 grand fir/Rocky Mountain maple-mallow ninebarkABGR/BRVU grand fir/Columbia bromePSME/ACGL-PHMA5 Douglas-fir/Rocky Mountain maple-mallow ninebarkPSME/ACGL-SYOR2 Douglas-fir/Rocky Mountain maple-mountain snowberryPSME/HODI Douglas-fir/oceanspray

ABGR/CAGE2 grand fir/elk sedgeABGR/CARU* grand fir/pinegrassABGR/SPBE2* grand fir/birchleaf spiraeaJUSC2/CELE3 Rocky Mountain juniper/mountain mahoganyPIPO/CAGE2 ponderosa pine/elk sedgePIPO/CARU ponderosa pine/pinegrassPIPO/CELE3/CAGE2 ponderosa pine/mountain mahogany/elk sedgePIPO/PUTR2/CAGE2 ponderosa pine/bitterbrush/elk sedgePIPO/PUTR2/CARO5 ponderosa pine/bitterbrush/Ross’ sedgePIPO/SPBE2 ponderosa pine/birchleaf spiraeaPIPO/SYAL* ponderosa pine/common snowberryPIPO/SYOR2 ponderosa pine/mountain snowberryPSME/ARNE/CAGE2 Douglas-fir/pinemat manzanita/elk sedgePSME/CAGE2 Douglas-fir/elk sedgePSME/CARU* Douglas-fir/pinegrassPSME/CELE3/CAGE2 Douglas-fir/mountain mahogany/elk sedgePSME/PHMA5 Douglas-fir/mallow ninebarkPSME/SPBE2 Douglas-fir/birchleaf spiraeaPSME/SYAL* Douglas-fir/common snowberryPSME/SYOR2* Douglas-fir/mountain snowberryPSME/SYOR2/CAGE2 Douglas-fir/mountain snowberry/elk sedgePSME/VAME* Douglas-fir/big huckleberryPSME-PIPO-JUOC/FEID Douglas-fir-ponderosa pine-western juniper/Idaho fescue

PIPO/ARAR8 ponderosa pine/low sagebrush

PIPO/AGSP* ponderosa pine/bluebunch wheatgrassPIPO/ARTRV/CAGE2 ponderosa pine/mountain big sagebrush/elk sedgePIPO/ARTRV/FEID-AGSP ponderosa pine/mountain big sagebrush/Idaho fescue-bluebunch wheatgrassPIPO/CELE3/FEID-AGSP ponderosa pine/mountain mahogany/Idaho fescue-bluebunch wheatgrassPIPO/CELE3/PONEW ponderosa pine/mountain mahogany/Wheeler’s bluegrassPIPO/FEID* ponderosa pine/Idaho fescuePIPO/PERA4 ponderosa pine/squaw applePIPO/PUTR2/AGSP ponderosa pine/bitterbrush/bluebunch wheatgrassPIPO/PUTR2/AGSP-POSA12 ponderosa pine/bitterbrush/bluebunch wheatgrass-Sandberg’s bluegrassPIPO/PUTR2/FEID-AGSP ponderosa pine/bitterbrush/Idaho fescue-bluebunch wheatgrassPIPO/RHGL ponderosa pine/smooth sumacPIPO-JUOC/CELE3-SYOR2 ponderosa pine-western juniper/mountain mahogany-mountain snowberry

War

mve

rym

oist

War

mm

oist

War

m d

ry

Dry

upl

and

fore

st

Hot

moi

stH

ot d

ry

Moi

st u

plan

d fo

rest

Page 25: Potential Vegetation Hierarchy · boundaries were established by using aquatic rather than terrestrial ecological units (Maxwell et al. 1995, Seaber et al. 1987). Province M332, “middle

21

Potential Vegetation Hierarchy for the Blue Mountains Section of Northeastern Oregon…

Table 2–Potential vegetation groups (PVG), plant association groups (PAG), and potential vegetation type(PVT) codes and common names for upland physiognomic classes (continued)

PVG PAG PVT code (PLANTS code) PVT common name

JUOC/ARTRV/FEID-AGSP western juniper/mountain big sagebrush/Idaho fescue-bluebunch wheatgrassJUOC/CELE3/CAGE2 western juniper/mountain mahogany/elk sedgeJUOC/CELE3/FEID-AGSP western juniper/mountain mahogany/Idaho fescue-bluebunch wheatgrassJUOC/FEID-AGSP western juniper/Idaho fescue-bluebunch wheatgrassJUOC/PUTR2/FEID-AGSP western juniper/bitterbrush/Idaho fescue-bluebunch wheatgrass

JUOC/AGSP western juniper/bluebunch wheatgrassJUOC/ARAR8 western juniper/low sagebrushJUOC/ARAR8/FEID western juniper/low sagebrush/Idaho fescueJUOC/ARRI2* western juniper/stiff sagebrush

ALSI3 Sitka alder snow slides

ARTRV/CAGE2 mountain big sagebrush/elk sedgeARTRV/CAHO5 mountain big sagebrush/Hood’s sedgeARTRV/FEVI mountain big sagebrush/green fescue

ARTRV/ERFL4-PHLOX mountain big sagebrush/golden buckwheat-phloxARTRV/LINU4 mountain big sagebrush/linanthusARTRV/STOC2 mountain big sagebrush/western needlegrass

POFR4 shrubby cinquefoil

ARAR8/FEID-AGSP low sagebrush/Idaho fescue-bluebunch wheatgrassARTRV/BRCA5 mountain big sagebrush/mountain bromeARTRV/CAGE2 (MONTANE) mountain big sagebrush/elk sedge (montane)ARTRV/ELCI2 mountain big sagebrush/basin wildryeARTRV/FEID-AGSP mountain big sagebrush/Idaho fescue-bluebunch wheatgrassARTRV/FEID-KOCR mountain big sagebrush/Idaho fescue-prairie junegrassARTRV-PERA4 mountain big sagebrush-squaw appleARTRV-SYOR2 mountain big sagebrush-mountain snowberryARTRV-SYOR2/BRCA5 mountain big sagebrush-mountain snowberry/mountain bromeCELE3/CAGE2* mountain mahogany/elk sedgeCELE3/FEID-AGSP mountain mahogany/Idaho fescue-bluebunch wheatgrassCELE3-PUTR2/AGSP mountain mahogany-bitterbrush/bluebunch wheatgrassCEVE snowbrush ceanothusJUCO6 mountain juniperPHMA5-SYAL* mallow ninebark-common snowberryPOFR4/FEID shrubby cinquefoil/Idaho fescuePREM bitter cherryPUTR2/FEID-AGSP bitterbrush/Idaho fescue-bluebunch wheatgrassPUTR2-ARTRV/FEID bitterbrush-mountain big sagebrush/Idaho fescuePUTR2-ARTRV/FEID-AGSP bitterbrush-mountain big sagebrush/Idaho fescue-bluebunch wheatgrassSYAL common snowberrySYAL/FEID-AGSP-LUSE4 common snowberry/Idaho fescue-bluebunch wheatgrass-silky lupineSYAL/FEID-KOCR common snowberry/Idaho fescue-prairie junegrassSYAL-ROSA5 common snowberry-roseSYOR2 mountain snowberry

Hot

moi

stH

ot d

ry

Moi

st u

plan

dw

oodl

and

Dry

upl

and

woo

dlan

dC

old

upla

nd s

hrub

Col

dve

rym

oist

Col

dm

oist

Coo

ldr

yC

ool

moi

stW

arm

moi

st

Moi

st u

plan

d sh

rub

Page 26: Potential Vegetation Hierarchy · boundaries were established by using aquatic rather than terrestrial ecological units (Maxwell et al. 1995, Seaber et al. 1987). Province M332, “middle

22

GENERAL TECHNICAL REPORT PNW-GTR-709

Table 2–Potential vegetation groups (PVG), plant association groups (PAG), and potential vegetation type(PVT) codes and common names for upland physiognomic classes (continued)

PVG PAG PVT code (PLANTS code) PVT common name

PHLE4 (TALUS) syringa-bordered talus strips

ARTRV-PUTR2/FEID mountain big sagebrush-bitterbrush/Idaho fescueCERE2/AGSP netleaf hackberry/bluebunch wheatgrassPERA4-SYOR2 squaw apple-mountain snowberryPUTR2/AGSP bitterbrush/bluebunch wheatgrass

ARAR8/AGSP low sagebrush/bluebunch wheatgrassARAR8/POSA12 low sagebrush/Sandberg’s bluegrassARRI2/PEGA stiff sagebrush/Gairdner’s penstemonARRI2/POSA12 (SCAB) stiff sagebrush/Sandberg’s bluegrass (scabland)ARTR4/POSA12-DAUN threetip sagebrush/Sandberg’s bluegrass-onespike oatgrassARTRV/AGSP-POSA12 mountain big sagebrush/bluebunch wheatgrass-Sandberg’s bluegrassBERE/AGSP-APAN2 creeping Oregongrape/bluebunch wheatgrass-spreading dogbaneCELE3 mountain mahoganyCELE3/AGSP mountain mahogany/bluebunch wheatgrassCELE3/PONEW mountain mahogany/Wheeler’s bluegrassPUTR2/ERDO bitterbrush/Douglas’ buckwheat

GLSPA/AGSP spiny greasebush/bluebunch wheatgrassRHGL/AGSP smooth sumac/bluebunch wheatgrass

FEID (ALPINE) Idaho fescue (alpine)FEVI green fescueFEVI-AGCA2 green fescue-bearded wheatgrassFEVI-CAHO5 green fescue-Hood’s sedgeFEVI-CARO5 green fescue-Ross’ sedgeFEVI-CASC12 green fescue-Holm’s Rocky Mountain sedgeFEVI-LICA2 green fescue-Canby’s lovageCold dryFEVI-LULA3 green fescue-spurred lupineFEVI-PENST green fescue-penstemonFEVI-STOC2 green fescue-western needlegrassPOPH (CORNICES) alpine fleeceflower (cornices)POPH-FEVI alpine fleeceflower-green fescue

CAGE2-CARU elk sedge-pinegrassCAGE2-FEID elk sedge-Idaho fescueCAGE2-JUPA elk sedge-Parry’s rushCAGE2-PHAU3 elk sedge-desert phloxCAGE2-POCU elk sedge-Cusick’s bluegrassCAGE2-STOC2 elk sedge-western needlegrassCAREX-STOC2 alpine sedges-western needlegrassFELLFIELD fellfieldFESC-FEID rough fescue-Idaho fescueFEVI-JUPA green fescue-Parry’s rushGRUS grus

Hot

very

moi

st

Hot

moi

st

Dry

upl

and

shru

b

War

m d

ryH

otdr

y

Col

d up

land

her

b

Col

d dr

yC

old

moi

st

Moi

st u

plan

dsh

rub

Page 27: Potential Vegetation Hierarchy · boundaries were established by using aquatic rather than terrestrial ecological units (Maxwell et al. 1995, Seaber et al. 1987). Province M332, “middle

23

Potential Vegetation Hierarchy for the Blue Mountains Section of Northeastern Oregon…

Table 2–Potential vegetation groups (PVG), plant association groups (PAG), and potential vegetation type(PVT) codes and common names for upland physiognomic classes (continued)

PVG PAG PVT code (PLANTS code) PVT common name

JUPA-AGGL Parry’s rush-pale agoserisPHLOX-CYTEF phlox-cymopterusPHLOX-IVGO phlox-IvesiaROCK OUTCROP rock outcropSCREE screeTURF turf

CAHO5 Hood’s sedgeCAHO5-BRCA5* Hood’s sedge-mountain bromeCAHO5-CAGE2 Hood’s sedge-elk sedgeFEID-AGSP-FRALC2 Idaho fescue-bluebunch wheatgrass-Cusick’s fraseraFEID-GETR Idaho fescue-red avensFEID-KOCR* Idaho fescue-prairie junegrassFEID-PESP2 Idaho fescue-Wallowa penstemonLEPY2-MAGL2 pygmy Lewisia-cluster tarweedLINU4-ARLO6 Nuttall’s linanthus-longleaf arnicaPOPR (DEGEN BENCH) Kentucky bluegrass (degenerated bench)PTAQ-CAHO5 bracken fern-Hood’s sedgeRUOC2-MAGL2 western coneflower-cluster tarweedSTOC2 western needlegrass

CAHO5-POGL9 Hood’s sedge-sticky cinquefoilERFL4-PECO golden buckwheat-coiled lousewortLINU4-ARLU linanthus-mountain mugwortLINU4-CYTEF linanthus-cymopterusMOOD mountain balmPOPH-AGUR-LINU4 alpine fleeceflower-horsemint-linanthusPOPH-CAGE2-LINU4 alpine fleeceflower-elk sedge-linanthusPOPH-CARU-CAGE2 alpine fleeceflower-pinegrass-elk sedge

CACU2 (SEEP) Cusick’s camas (seep)FEID-DAIN-CAPE7 Idaho fescue-timber oatgrass-Liddon’s sedge

AGSP-BRCA5 bluebunch wheatgrass-mountain bromeFEID-AGSP* Idaho fescue-bluebunch wheatgrassFEID-AGSP-BASA3 Idaho fescue-bluebunch wheatgrass-arrowleaf balsamrootFEID-AGSP-LUPIN Idaho fescue-bluebunch wheatgrass-lupineFEID-AGSP-PHCO10 Idaho fescue-bluebunch wheatgrass-Snake River phloxFEID-AGSP-PHLOX Idaho fescue-bluebunch wheatgrass-phloxFEID-CAGE2 Idaho fescue-elk sedgeFEID-CAHO5 Idaho fescue-Hood’s sedgeFEID-KOCR (LOW) Idaho fescue-prairie junegrass (low elevation)

ELCI2 basin wildrye

DAUN-LOLE2 onespike oatgrass-slenderfruit lomatium

Coo

l dry

Moi

st u

plan

d he

rb

War

mve

ry m

oist

War

m m

oist

Hot

very

moi

st

Hot

moi

stC

ool m

oist

Col

d dr

y

Col

d up

land

her

b

Page 28: Potential Vegetation Hierarchy · boundaries were established by using aquatic rather than terrestrial ecological units (Maxwell et al. 1995, Seaber et al. 1987). Province M332, “middle

24

GENERAL TECHNICAL REPORT PNW-GTR-709

Table 2–Potential vegetation groups (PVG), plant association groups (PAG), and potential vegetation type(PVT) codes and common names for upland physiognomic classes (continued)

PVG PAG PVT code (PLANTS code) PVT common name

FEID-AGSP-CYTEF Idaho fescue-bluebunch wheatgrass-cymopterusFEID-AGSP-PONEW Idaho fescue-bluebunch wheatgrass-Wheeler’s bluegrassFEID-DAUN Idaho fescue-onespike oatgrassMEBU-STOC2 oniongrass-western needlegrassPOSA12-SELA Sandberg’s bluegrass-lanceleaf stonecropSTOC2-SIHY (ALPINE) western needlegrass-squirreltail (alpine)

AGSP-CYTEF bluebunch wheatgrass-cymopterusAGSP-ERHE2 bluebunch wheatgrass-Wyeth’s buckwheatAGSP-ERUM bluebunch wheatgrass-sulphurflower buckwheatAGSP-POSA12* bluebunch wheatgrass-Sandberg’s bluegrassAGSP-POSA12-APAN2 bluebunch wheatgrass-Sandberg’s bluegrass-spreading dogbaneAGSP-POSA12-ASCU5 bluebunch wheatgrass-Sandberg’s bluegrass-Cusick’s milkvetchAGSP-POSA12-ASRE5 bluebunch wheatgrass-Sandberg’s bluegrass-Blue Mountain milkvetchAGSP-POSA12-BASA3 bluebunch wheatgrass-Sandberg’s bluegrass-arrowleaf balsamrootAGSP-POSA12-DAUN bluebunch wheatgrass-Sandberg’s bluegrass-onespike oatgrassAGSP-POSA12-ERHE2 bluebunch wheatgrass-Sandberg’s bluegrass-creamy buckwheatAGSP-POSA12-ERPU2 bluebunch wheatgrass-Sandberg’s bluegrass-shaggy fleabaneAGSP-POSA12-LUPIN bluebunch wheatgrass-Sandberg’s bluegrass-lupineAGSP-POSA12-OPPO bluebunch wheatgrass-Sandberg’s bluegrass-pricklypearAGSP-POSA12-PHCO10 bluebunch wheatgrass-Sandberg’s bluegrass-Snake River phloxAGSP-POSA12-SCAN3 bluebunch wheatgrass-Sandberg’s bluegrass-narrowleaf skullcapAGSP-POSA12-TRMA3 bluebunch wheatgrass-Sandberg’s bluegrass-bighead cloverAGSP-SPCR-ARLO3 bluebunch wheatgrass-sand dropseed-red threeawnERDO-POSA12 Douglas’ buckwheat-Sandberg’s bluegrassERIOG/PHOR2 buckwheat/Oregon bladderpodERST4-POSA12 strict buckwheat/Sandberg’s bluegrassERUM (RIDGE) sulphurflower (ridge)LECOW2 (RIM) Wallowa Lewisia (rim)POBU-MAGL2 bulbous bluegrass-cluster tarweedPOSA12-DAUN Sandberg’s bluegrass-onespike oatgrassSPCR (TERRACE) sand dropseed (terrace)

* The PVT has been described for more than one of the Blue Mountains potential vegetation classifications (Crowe and Clausnitzer1997, Johnson 2004, Johnson and Clausnitzer 1992, Johnson and Simon 1987, Johnson and Swanson 2005, and Wells 2006) and islisted more than once in appendix tables 8 and 9 (each listing has a different ecoclass code).

Hot

dry

War

m d

ry

Dry

upl

and

herb

Page 29: Potential Vegetation Hierarchy · boundaries were established by using aquatic rather than terrestrial ecological units (Maxwell et al. 1995, Seaber et al. 1987). Province M332, “middle

25

Potential Vegetation Hierarchy for the Blue Mountains Section of Northeastern Oregon…

Assignment of riparian PVTs to physiognomic temperature-moisture matrices

is presented for the three riparian forest physiognomic classes (table 4).

Potential Vegetation Groups

Potential vegetation information was used extensively during the interior Columbia

River basin scientific assessment (Quigley and Arbelbide 1997, Quigley et al.

1996). When analyzing such a large area, however, it was found that the level of

detail associated with PAGs (e.g., temperature-moisture matrix cells) was at too

fine a scale for examining trends across a large assessment area containing portions

of seven Western States. Therefore, PAGs were aggregated into a higher level

taxonomic unit called potential vegetation groups (PVGs) (Jensen et al. 1997).

For the Blue Mountains section, PVGs are the middle level of the midscale

portion of the PV hierarchy (fig. 2). Two or three PVGs were established for each

of the seven physiognomic classes. Potential vegetation groups are named for a

predominant or controlling temperature or moisture relationship (table 5).

The midscale portion of the PV hierarchy is described in tables 2 and 4; each

table shows fine-scale PVTs organized by physiognomic class, PVT aggregations

into PAGs (PVTs grouped into temperature-moisture cells), and PAG aggregations

into PVGs.

Summary statistics for both portions of the PV hierarchy (e.g., fine-scale and

midscale) are presented in table 6.

The appendix shows how 507 fine-scale PVTs described for the Blue Moun-

Table 3—A 12-cell matrix of temperature and soil moisture categories

Soil moisture (SM)

Temperature High Moderate Low

Cold Cold high SM Cold moderate SM Cold low SM

Cool Cool high SM Cool moderate SM Cool low SM

Warm Warm high SM Warm moderate SM Warm low SM

Hot Hot high SM Hot moderate SM Hot low SM

A 4 by 3 temperature-moisture matrix like the one shown here was used for the threephysiognomic classes included in table 4: riparian forest, riparian shrub, and riparian herb.The fine-scale potential vegetation types occurring in a riparian physiognomic class wereassigned to one, and only one, of the class’s matrix cells. Individual matrix cells (cool lowSM, etc.) are used as plant association groups in the midscale portion of the potentialvegetation hierarchy (fig. 2). Potential vegetation

groups are namedfor a predominantor controlling tem-perature or moisturerelationship.

Page 30: Potential Vegetation Hierarchy · boundaries were established by using aquatic rather than terrestrial ecological units (Maxwell et al. 1995, Seaber et al. 1987). Province M332, “middle

26

GENERAL TECHNICAL REPORT PNW-GTR-709

Table 4–Potential vegetation groups (PVG), plant association groups (PAG), and potential vegetation type (PVT)codes and common names for riparian physiognomic classes

PVG PAG PVT code (PLANTS code) PVT common name

ABLA/ATFI subalpine fir/ladyfernABLA/CAAQ subalpine fir/aquatic sedgeABLA/CADI6 subalpine fir/softleaf sedgeABLA/SETR subalpine fir/arrowleaf groundselABLA/VAUL/CASC12 subalpine fir/bog blueberry/Holm’s Rocky Mountain sedgeABLA-PIEN/LEGL (FLOODPLAIN) subalpine fir/Engelmann spruce/Labrador tea (floodplain)PICO/CAAQ lodgepole pine/aquatic sedgePICO/CASC12 lodgepole pine/Holm’s Rocky Mountain sedgePIEN/ATFI Engelmann spruce/ladyfernPIEN/CADI6 Engelmann spruce/softleaf sedgePIEN/SETR Engelmann spruce/arrowleaf groundselPIEN-ABLA/CASC12 Engelmann spruce-subalpine fir/Holm’s Rocky Mountain sedgePIEN-ABLA/SETR Engelmann spruce-subalpine fir/arrowleaf groundsel

ABLA/CACA4 subalpine fir/bluejoint reedgrassABLA/VAME (FLOODPLAIN) subalpine fir/big huckleberry (floodplain)ABLA-PIEN/MEFE (FLOODPLAIN) subalpine fir-Engelmann spruce (floodplain)PICO/ALIN2/MESIC FORB lodgepole pine/mountain alder/mesic forbPICO/CACA4 lodgepole pine/bluejoint reedgrassPICO/CALA30 lodgepole pine/woolly sedgePICO/DECE lodgepole pine/tufted hairgrassPIEN/CILA2 Engelmann spruce/drooping woodreedPIEN/COST4 Engelmann spruce/red osier dogwoodPIEN/EQAR Engelmann spruce/common horsetail

PICO/POPR lodgepole pine/Kentucky bluegrassPIEN/BRVU Engelmann spruce/Columbia brome

ABGR/ATFI grand fir/ladyfernABGR/CALA30 grand fir/woolly sedgeABGR/CRDO2/CADE9 grand fir/black hawthorn/Dewey’s sedgeABGR/TABR2/LIBO3 (FLOODPLAIN) grand fir/Pacific yew/twinflower (floodplain)ALRU2/ATFI red alder/ladyfernPOTR5/CAAQ quaking aspen/aquatic sedge

ABGR/ACGL (FLOODPLAIN) grand fir/Rocky Mountain maple (floodplain)ALRU2 (ALLUVIAL BAR) red alder (alluvial bar)ALRU2/COST4 red alder/red osier dogwoodALRU2/PEFRP red alder/sweet coltsfootALRU2/PHCA11 red alder/Pacific ninebarkALRU2/SYAL red alder/common snowberryALRU2/SYAL/CADE9 red alder/common snowberry/Dewey’s sedgePIMO3/DECE western white pine/tufted hairgrassPOTR5/ALIN2-COST4 quaking aspen/mountain alder-red osier dogwoodPOTR5/ALIN2-SYAL quaking aspen/mountain alder-common snowberryPOTR5/CACA4 quaking aspen/bluejoint reedgrassPOTR5/CALA30 quaking aspen/woolly sedgePOTR5/MESIC FORB quaking aspen/mesic forbPOTR15/ACGL black cottonwood/Rocky Mountain maplePOTR15/ALIN2-COST4 black cottonwood/mountain alder-red osier dogwoodPSME/ACGL-PHMA5 (FLOODPLAIN) Douglas-fir/Rocky Mountain maple-ninebark (floodplain)PSME/TRCA Douglas-fir/false bugbane

Col

d hi

gh s

oil m

oist

ure

(SM

)

Col

d r

ipar

ian

fore

st

Col

d m

oder

ate

SMC

old

low

SM

War

mhi

gh S

MW

arm

mod

erat

e SM

War

m r

ipar

ian

fore

st

Page 31: Potential Vegetation Hierarchy · boundaries were established by using aquatic rather than terrestrial ecological units (Maxwell et al. 1995, Seaber et al. 1987). Province M332, “middle

27

Potential Vegetation Hierarchy for the Blue Mountains Section of Northeastern Oregon…

Table 4–Potential vegetation groups (PVG), plant association groups (PAG), and potential vegetation type (PVT) codes andcommon names for riparian physiognomic classes (continued)

PVG PAG PVT code (PLANTS code) PVT common name

ALRH2/MESIC SHRUB white alder/mesic shrubALRH2/RUBUS white alder/blackberryPIPO/CRDO2 ponderosa pine/black hawthornPOTR15/SALA5 black cottonwood/Pacific willowPOTR5/SYAL quaking aspen/common snowberryPOTR15/SYAL* black cottonwood/common snowberry

ABGR/SYAL (FLOODPLAIN) grand fir/common snowberry (floodplain)PSME/SYAL (FLOODPLAIN) Douglas-fir/common snowberry (floodplain)

PIPO/POPR ponderosa pine/Kentucky bluegrassPIPO/SYAL (FLOODPLAIN) ponderosa pine/common snowberry (floodplain)POTR5/POPR quaking aspen/Kentucky bluegrass

KAMI/CANI2 alpine laurel/black alpine sedgeSAAR27 arctic willowSABO2/CASC12 Booth’s willow/Holm’s Rocky Mountain sedgeSABO2/CAVE6 Booth’s willow/inflated sedgeSACO2/CAPR5 undergreen willow/clustered field sedgeSACO2/CASC12 undergreen willow/Holm’s Rocky Mountain sedgeSACO2/CAUT undergreen willow/bladder sedgeSADR/SETR Drummond’s willow/arrowleaf groundselSAFA/ALVA Farr’s willow/Pacific onion

LEGL/CASC12 Labrador tea/Holm’s Rocky Mountain sedgePHEM (MOUNDS) pink mountainheath (mounds)POFR4-BEGL shrubby cinquefoil-bog birch

SALIX/CAAQ willow/aquatic sedge

SALIX/CACA4 willow/bluejoint reedgrass

ALIN2/ATFI mountain alder/ladyfernALIN2/CAAM10 mountain alder/bigleaf sedgeALIN2/CAAQ mountain alder/aquatic sedgeALIN2/CAUT mountain alder/bladder sedgeALIN2/GLEL mountain alder/tall mannagrassALIN2/SCMI2 mountain alder/smallfruit bulrushALSI3/ATFI Sitka alder/ladyfernALSI3/CILA2 Sitka alder/drooping woodreedBEOC2/WET SEDGE water birch/wet sedgeCOST4/ATFI red osier dogwood/ladyfernCOST4/SAAR13 Red osier dogwood/brook saxifrageRIBES/CILA2 currants/drooping woodreedRIBES/GLEL currants/tall mannagrassSAEA-SATW/CAAQ Eastwood willow-Tweedy willow/aquatic sedgeSALIX/CAUT willow/bladder sedgeSASI2/EQAR Sitka willow/common horsetail

Hot

mod

erat

e SM

War

mlo

w S

M

Low

SM

ripa

rian

fore

st

Hot

low

SM

Col

d hi

gh S

M

Col

d ri

pari

an s

hrub

Col

dm

oder

ate

SM

Coo

lhi

ghSM

Coo

lm

oder

ate

SM

War

m r

ipar

ian

shru

b

War

m h

igh

SM

War

m r

ipar

ian

fore

st

Page 32: Potential Vegetation Hierarchy · boundaries were established by using aquatic rather than terrestrial ecological units (Maxwell et al. 1995, Seaber et al. 1987). Province M332, “middle

28

GENERAL TECHNICAL REPORT PNW-GTR-709

Table 4–Potential vegetation groups (PVG), plant association groups (PAG), and potential vegetation type (PVT)codes and common names for riparian physiognomic classes (continued)

PVG PAG PVT code (PLANTS code) PVT common name

ALIN2/CACA4 mountain alder/bluejoint reedgrassALIN2/CADE9 mountain alder/Dewey’s sedgeALIN2/CALA30 mountain alder/woolly sedgeALIN2/CALEL mountain alder/densely tufted sedgeALIN2/EQAR mountain alder/common horsetailALIN2/GYDR mountain alder/oakfernALIN2/HELA4 mountain alder/common cowparsnipALIN2-COST4/MESIC FORB mountain alder-red osier dogwood/mesic forbALIN2-RIBES/MESIC FORB mountain alder-currants/mesic forbALSI3/MESIC FORB Sitka alder/mesic forbBEOC2/MESIC FORB water birch/mesic forbBEOC2/PHAR3 water birch/reed canarygrassCOST4 red osier dogwoodLOIN5/ATFI twinberry honeysuckle/ladyfernPOFR4/DECE shrubby cinquefoil/tufted hairgrassRHAL/MESIC FORB alderleaf buckthorn/mesic forbRIBES/MESIC FORB currants/mesic forbSAEX coyote willowSALE/MESIC FORB Lemmon’s willow/mesic forbSALIX/CALA30 willow/woolly sedgeSALIX/MESIC FORB willow/mesic forb

ARCA13/DECE silver sagebrush/tufted hairgrassRUDI2 Himalayan blackberryRUPA thimbleberrySARI2 rigid willowSYAL (FLOODPLAIN) common snowberry (floodplain)

ALIN2/CALU7 mountain alder/woodrush sedgeALIN2/POPR mountain alder/Kentucky bluegrassALIN2-SYAL mountain alder-common snowberryPHCA11 Pacific ninebarkPOFR4/POPR shrubby cinquefoil/Kentucky bluegrassSALIX/POPR willow/Kentucky bluegrassSASC/ELGL Scouler’s willow/blue wildrye

ACGL Rocky Mountain mapleAMAL2 western serviceberryARCA13/POCU3 silver sagebrush/Cusick’s bluegrassARCA13/POPR silver sagebrush/Kentucky bluegrassARTRV/POCU3 mountain big sagebrush/Cusick’s bluegrassCERE2/BROMU netleaf hackberry/bromeCRDO2/MESIC FORB black hawthorn/mesic forbPHLE4/MESIC FORB Lewis’ mockorange/mesic forbRUBA Barton’s raspberry

War

m m

oder

ate

SMH

otm

oder

ate

SM

War

m r

ipar

ian

shru

bsL

ow S

M r

ipar

ian

shru

b

War

m lo

w S

MH

ot lo

w S

M

Page 33: Potential Vegetation Hierarchy · boundaries were established by using aquatic rather than terrestrial ecological units (Maxwell et al. 1995, Seaber et al. 1987). Province M332, “middle

29

Potential Vegetation Hierarchy for the Blue Mountains Section of Northeastern Oregon…

Table 4–Potential vegetation groups (PVG), plant association groups (PAG), and potential vegetation type (PVT)codes and common names for riparian physiognomic classes (continued)

PVG PAG PVT code (PLANTS code) PVT common name

ALVA Pacific onionALVA-CASC12 Pacific onion-Holm’s Rocky Mountain sedgeCAEU2 widefruit sedgeCALA13 smoothstemmed sedgeCALE9 Sierra hare sedgeCALI7 mud sedgeCALU7 woodrush sedgeCAPR5 clustered field sedgeCASC10-SAAR13 northern singlespike sedge-brook saxifrageCASC12 Holm’s Rocky Mountain sedgeCILA2 drooping woodreedELBE delicate spikerushELPA6 fewflowered spikerushSPAN2 narrowleaf bur-reed

CANI2 black alpine sedge

CAAQ aquatic sedgeCAUT bladder sedgeCAVE6 inflated sedgeNUPO2 Rocky Mountain pondlilySETR-MILE2 arrowleaf groundsel-purple monkeyflower

CACA4 bluejoint reedgrassDECE tufted hairgrass

ADPE maidenhair fernCAAM10 bigleaf sedgeCACU5 Cusick’s sedgeCALA11 slender sedgeCASI2 shortbeaked sedgeCAST5 sawbeak sedgeGLEL tall mannagrassMETR3 buckbeanPUPA3 weak alkaligrassSAAR13 brook saxifrageSCMI2 smallfruit bulrushSETR arrowleaf groundselVEAM2 American speedwell

Col

d hi

gh S

M

Col

d r

ipar

ian

her

b

Col

dm

oder

ate

SM

Coo

lhi

gh S

MC

ool

mod

erat

eSM

War

m r

ipar

ian

her

b

War

m h

igh

SM

Page 34: Potential Vegetation Hierarchy · boundaries were established by using aquatic rather than terrestrial ecological units (Maxwell et al. 1995, Seaber et al. 1987). Province M332, “middle

30

GENERAL TECHNICAL REPORT PNW-GTR-709

Table 4–Potential vegetation groups (PVG), plant association groups (PAG), and potential vegetation type (PVT)codes and common names for riparian physiognomic classes (continued)

PVG PAG PVT code (PLANTS code) PVT common name

CACA11 silvery sedgeCAJO Jones’ sedgeCALA30 woolly sedgeCALE8 lakeshore sedgeCAMI7 smallwing sedgeCAMU7 star sedgeCANE2 Nebraska sedgeCASU6 brown sedgeEQAR common horsetailHELA4-ELGL common cowparsnip/blue wildryeJUBA Baltic rushRUOC2 western coneflowerVERAT* false hellebore

CANU5 torrent sedgeELPA3 creeping spikerushTYLA common cattail

CASH Sheldon’s sedge

AGDI thin bentgrassALPR3 meadow foxtailARLU white sagebrushPOPR (DRY MEADOW) Kentucky bluegrass (dry meadow)

Note that PVT codes followed by an asterisk denote instances where a PVT has been described for more than one of the BlueMountains potential vegetation classifications (Crowe and Clausnitzer 1997, Johnson 2004, Johnson and Clausnitzer 1992, Johnsonand Simon 1987, Johnson and Swanson 2005, and Wells 2006) and are listed more than once in appendix tables 8 and 9 (each listinghas a different ecoclass code).

Hot

mod

erat

eSM

Low

SM

ripa

rian

her

b

War

m m

oder

ate

SMH

ot h

igh

SMW

arm

low

SM

War

m r

ipar

ian

her

b

Page 35: Potential Vegetation Hierarchy · boundaries were established by using aquatic rather than terrestrial ecological units (Maxwell et al. 1995, Seaber et al. 1987). Province M332, “middle

31

Potential Vegetation Hierarchy for the Blue Mountains Section of Northeastern Oregon…

Table 5–Potential vegetation groups associated with seven physiognomic classes forthe Blue Mountains section

Physiognomic class

Upland Upland Upland Upland Riparian Riparian Riparianforest shrub herb woodland forest shrub herb

Cold Cold Cold Cold Cold Coldupland upland upland riparian riparian riparianforest shrub herb forest shrub herb

Moist Moist Moist Moist Warm Warm Warmupland upland upland upland riparian riparian riparianforest shrub herb woodland forest shrub herb

Dry Dry Dry Dry Low SM Low SM Low SMupland upland upland upland riparian riparian riparianforest shrub herb woodland forest shrub herb

SM = soil moisture.

Table 6—Summary statistics pertaining to the mid- and fine-scale portions of thepotential vegetation hierarchy for the Blue Mountains section

Potential vegetation unit Potential units a Actual units b

Midscale hierarchical unitsPhysiognomic classes 8 7

Potential vegetation groups 21 20

Plant association groups 100 58Fine-scale hierarchical units

Series NA d

Potential vegetation types c: NA 507Phases NA d

a Total number of possible units when based on the classification framework used to developthe midscale portion of the potential vegetation hierarchy (see fig. 2); NA (not applicable) isshown for the fine-scale portion of the hierarchy because at that scale, the number of potentialunits is a function of vegetation occurrence (i.e., vegetation habitat as determined by biophysi-cal environments) rather than the classification framework itself.b The number of hierarchical units actually established for the Blue Mountains section. Whenthe “actual units” value is less than the “potential units” value, it means that one or moreframework entities (cells in a temperature-moisture matrix, for example) were empty or notused for the Blue Mountains section.c In the context of this report, “potential vegetation types” refers to three taxonomic unitsdescribed in fine-scale potential vegetation classifications for the Blue Mountains section (plantassociations, plant community types, and plant communities as described in Crowe andClausnitzer 1997, Johnson 2004, Johnson and Clausnitzer 1992, Johnson and Simon 1987,Johnson and Swanson 2005, and Wells 2006).d Neither series nor phases were used for the fine-scale portion of the Blue Mountains potentialvegetation hierarchy.

Page 36: Potential Vegetation Hierarchy · boundaries were established by using aquatic rather than terrestrial ecological units (Maxwell et al. 1995, Seaber et al. 1987). Province M332, “middle

32

GENERAL TECHNICAL REPORT PNW-GTR-709

tains section (Crowe and Clausnitzer 1997, Johnson 2004, Johnson and Clausnitzer

1992, Johnson and Simon 1987, Johnson and Swanson 2005, Wells 2006) were

assigned to midscale hierarchical units (PAGs and PVGs). Appendix table 8 orga-

nizes this information by PVT code; appendix table 9 organizes it by ecoclass code

(Hall 1998, as supplemented).

Step-Down Process for Developing Midscale Hierarchical Units

The interior Columbia River basin scientific assessment area contains all or part of

7 terrestrial ecological provinces and 23 sections (Jensen et al. 1997); the process

described below was used to step the broad-scale PV framework down to the

hierarchical level of a single section (section M332G, the “Blue Mountains,” in

province M332, middle Rocky Mountain steppe–coniferous forest–alpine meadow)

(Bailey 1995, 1998; Cleland et al. 1997; McNab and Avers 1994).

The step-down process was used to develop the physiognomic classes, PVGs

and PAGs described in the previous section and shown in tables 2 and 4.

1. During preparation of an ecosystem components assessment for the interior

Columbia River basin assessment area (Quigley and Arbelbide 1997), each

upland PVT described for the Blue Mountains section was assigned to one of

four temperature-moisture matrices: upland forest, upland woodland, upland

shrub, and upland herb (Reid et al. 1995). The matrices were selected to reflect

vegetation physiognomy or life form differences.

2. A Umatilla National Forest PV working group reviewed the upland

temperature-moisture matrices developed for the Blue Mountains section and

decided to adopt the matrix cells as PAGs (Powell 1998).

3. Eventually, all three Blue Mountains national forests (Malheur, Umatilla, and

Wallowa-Whitman) agreed to adopt the temperature-moisture matrix approach

as a PV framework for meeting midscale assessment needs (USDA Forest

Service 2002).

4. The three Blue Mountains national forests then decided how PAGs

(temperature-moisture matrix cells) would be aggregated to form the middle

level of the midscale portion of the PV hierarchy, PVGs.

5. A Blue Mountains PV working group made initial PVT assignments for

the riparian matrices (forest, shrub, herb). For the interior Columbia River

basin assessment effort, riparian PVTs had been assigned to a riparian PAG

by using three criteria: membership in, or a linkage to, an upland matrix;

physiognomy (life form); and riparian moisture phase (low, moderate, or high)

(Manning and Engelking 1997). This approach was conceptually inconsistent

A step-down proc-ess was used todevelop the physi-ognomic classes,PVGs and PAGs.

Page 37: Potential Vegetation Hierarchy · boundaries were established by using aquatic rather than terrestrial ecological units (Maxwell et al. 1995, Seaber et al. 1987). Province M332, “middle

33

Potential Vegetation Hierarchy for the Blue Mountains Section of Northeastern Oregon…

with how the upland matrices had been developed, so the Blue Mountains

group decided to use the temperature categories adopted for the upland

matrices (cold, cool, warm, hot) and to characterize moisture by using the

riparian moisture phases (low, moderate, high) from the interior Columbia

River basin riparian classification framework (Manning and Engelking 1997).

6. The final result of this process was two classification frameworks: a 4 by 4

temperature-moisture matrix used for each of four upland physiognomic classes

(table 1), and a 4 by 3 temperature-soil moisture matrix used for each of three

riparian physiognomic classes (table 3).

7. After the preliminary results of this process were documented (Powell 1998,

USDA Forest Service 2002), the PV hierarchy began to be used for a variety of

midscale purposes:

• The PAGs or PVGs are used as biophysical environments when

conducting historical range of variability analyses comparing an area’s

existing and historical proportions of forest structure classes (Blackwood

1998, O’Hara et al. 1996, USDA Forest Service 1995).

• When revising the Land and Resource Management Plans for the Blue

Mountains section, PAGs or PVGs were used for ecological stratifica-

tion (USDA Forest Service 2002) during characterization of terrestrial

and aquatic environments, and when modeling disturbance processes

with the Vegetation Dynamics Development Tool (Beukema et al. 2003).

• The PAGs were used when deriving fire regimes (table 7) and

biophysical settings, a prerequisite before characterizing an area’s

departure from its historical composition, structure, stand age, canopy

cover, and patch configuration (Brown et al. 2004, Franklin and Agee

2003). The degree to which current vegetation conditions depart from

historical conditions is referred to as the “fire regime condition class”

descriptor (Hann et al. 2005, Morgan et al. 1996, Schmidt et al. 2002).

Concerns About Subjectivity

The matrix approach is based on a relative ranking of the temperature and moisture

status represented by each fine-scale PVT. Because the rankings are relative, there

may be a tendency to perceive overlap in the temperature-moisture relationships

between PVTs, particularly for closely related types. For this reason, it may be

difficult to decide which matrix cell is the best fit for types whose temperature or

moisture relationships seem too broad to fit a single category.

A perception of temperature or moisture overlap is not surprising and occurs

Page 38: Potential Vegetation Hierarchy · boundaries were established by using aquatic rather than terrestrial ecological units (Maxwell et al. 1995, Seaber et al. 1987). Province M332, “middle

34

GENERAL TECHNICAL REPORT PNW-GTR-709

Table 7–Relationship between plant association groupsand fire regimes for the Blue Mountains section

Plant association groupa Fire regimeb

Cold dry UF 3, 4Cold dry UH 5Cold high SM RF 4Cold high SM RH 4Cold high SM RS 4Cold low SM RF 4Cold moderate SM RF 4Cold moist UF 4Cold moist UH 4Cold moist US 4Cold very moist US 5Cool dry UF 3, 4Cool dry UH 4Cool dry US 3Cool moderate SM RH 4Cool high SM RH 4Cool moist UF 3, 4Cool moist UH 2Cool moist US 4Cool very moist UF 4Cool wet UF 4Hot dry UF 1Hot dry UH 2Hot dry US 2Hot dry UW 3Hot high SM RH 4Hot low SM RF 1Hot low SM RS 1Hot moderate SM RF 1Hot moderate SM RH 3Hot moderate SM RS 3Hot moist UF 1Hot moist UH 3Hot moist US 3Hot moist UW 3Hot very moist UH 2Hot very moist US 2Warm dry UF 1Warm dry UH 2Warm dry US 2Warm high SM RF 4Warm high SM RH 4Warm high SM RS 4Warm low SM RF 1Warm low SM RH 2Warm low SM RS 4

Page 39: Potential Vegetation Hierarchy · boundaries were established by using aquatic rather than terrestrial ecological units (Maxwell et al. 1995, Seaber et al. 1987). Province M332, “middle

35

Potential Vegetation Hierarchy for the Blue Mountains Section of Northeastern Oregon…

frequently with ecological classification systems involving some element of inter-

pretation or subjectivity. In some instances, the temperature or moisture overlap

may be ecologically valid, in which case the zone of overlap can be thought of as

an ecotone.

In many instances, however, perceived overlap in temperature or moisture

relationships reflects differences of opinion about which portion of the environ-

mental gradient is represented by a particular PVT (and its diagnostic indicator

plants). For example, one practitioner might believe that the PSME/HODI plant

association should be assigned to the “warm dry” temperature-moisture matrix cell,

whereas another believes it best fits the “warm moist” cell.

Practitioners have different ecological experience and education, and these

differences influence their perceptions about the temperature and moisture status of

PVTs. This means that some difference of opinion about the environmental indica-

tor status of PVTs is expected.

Even though the classification framework described in this report relies on

interpretation (including some element of subjectivity), we believe the temperature-

moisture matrix approach best reflects our current understanding of environmental

gradients while also providing a conceptually sound process for establishing

midscale taxonomic units of PV.

Table 7–Relationship between plant association groupsand fire regimes for the Blue Mountains section(continued)

Plant association groupa Fire regimeb

Warm moderate SM RF 4Warm moderate SM RH 4Warm moderate SM RS 4Warm moist UF 3Warm moist UH 2Warm moist US 2, 3Warm very moist UF 3Warm very moist UH 2a Plant association group is the lowest level of the midscaleportion of the potential vegetation hierarchy (fig. 2). Plantassociation group composition is described in tables 2 and 4.b Fire regimes characterize the historical fire frequency andseverity under which plant communities evolved (Franklinand Agee 2003, Morgan et al. 1996). Fire regimes, which areclassified into five categories (Schmidt et al. 2002), are defined inthe glossary.

Page 40: Potential Vegetation Hierarchy · boundaries were established by using aquatic rather than terrestrial ecological units (Maxwell et al. 1995, Seaber et al. 1987). Province M332, “middle

36

GENERAL TECHNICAL REPORT PNW-GTR-709

Glossaryabiotic—Nonliving components of the environment that are not currently part of

living organisms, such as soils, rocks, water, air, light, and nutrients (Dunster and

Dunster 1996).

aquatic—Waters of the United States, including wetlands, that serve as habitat for

interrelated and interacting communities and populations of plants and animals

(Maxwell et al. 1995).

biophysical environment—Landscape-level unit of vegetation composition and

structure, with its associated environmental gradients and processes of change

(Quigley and Arbelbide 1997).

biotic—Any living component of an ecosystem, including plants and animals and

other organisms (Dunster and Dunster 1996); an entity distinct from abiotic physi-

cal and chemical components (Allaby 1998).

classification—The process of grouping similar entities together into named types

or classes based on shared characteristics, or the grouping of similar types accord-

ing to criteria that are considered significant for this purpose (Winthers et al.

2005).

climax—The culminating seral stage in plant succession for any given site where,

in the absence of high-severity disturbances, the vegetation has reached a highly

stable condition and undergoes change very slowly (Dunster and Dunster 1996). A

self-replacing community that is relatively stable over several generations of the

dominant plant species, or very persistent in comparison to other seral stages

(Kimmins 1997).

coniferous—Trees bearing cones and commonly having needle-shaped leaves

usually retained throughout the year; conifers are adapted to moisture deficiency

caused by frozen ground or soils that are not moisture retentive (Bailey 1998).

ecological amplitude—The degree to which an organism can tolerate variations in

environmental conditions (Dunster and Dunster 1996).

ecological type—A category of land or water having a unique and mappable com-

bination of biotic and abiotic elements differing from other ecological types in its

ability to produce vegetation and respond to management practices (Maxwell et al.

1995, Winthers et al. 2005).

Page 41: Potential Vegetation Hierarchy · boundaries were established by using aquatic rather than terrestrial ecological units (Maxwell et al. 1995, Seaber et al. 1987). Province M332, “middle

37

Potential Vegetation Hierarchy for the Blue Mountains Section of Northeastern Oregon…

ecological unit—A mapped terrestrial or aquatic unit comprising one or more

ecological types, and designed to identify land and water areas at different levels

of resolution (Maxwell et al. 1995). Map units designed to identify land and water

areas at different levels of resolution based on similar capabilities and potentials for

response to management and natural disturbance (Winthers et al. 2005).

ecology—The science studying the relationships among living things and their

environment (Botkin 1990). This term was first coined in 1866 by Ernst Haeckel

(Stauffer 1957). The major theme throughout the history of ecology and the

concepts forming its foundation has been the interdependence of living things. An

awareness, more philosophical than purely scientific, of this quality is what has

generally been meant by an “ecological point of view” (Worster 1996).

ecosystem—A set of interacting species and their local, nonbiological environment,

functioning together to sustain life (Botkin 1990). A.G. Tansley first used this term

in 1935 to describe a discrete unit consisting of living and nonliving components,

interacting to form a stable system (Tansley 1935).

existing vegetation—The plant cover, or floristic composition and vegetation

structure, occurring at a given location at the current time (Winthers et al. 2005).

fire regime—A characterization of the historical combination of fire frequency and

fire severity under which plant communities evolved and were maintained (Schmidt

et al. 2002). Five fire regimes are currently recognized:

fire regime 1 (I): 0- to 35-year fire frequency; low fire severity on dominant

overstory vegetation.

fire regime 2 (II): 0- to 35-year fire frequency; stand-replacement fire severity

on dominant overstory vegetation.

fire regime 3 (III): 35- to 100+ year fire frequency; mixed fire severity on

dominant overstory vegetation.

fire regime 4 (IV): 35- to 100+ year fire frequency; stand-replacement fire

severity on dominant overstory vegetation.

fire regime 5 (V): 200+ year fire frequency; stand-replacement fire severity on

dominant overstory vegetation.

forb—Any broad-leaved, herbaceous plant other than grasses, sedges, and rushes

(Helms 1998).

forb land—Land areas of sufficient size to be delineated as a mapping unit where

the predominant vegetation life form consists of forbs.

Page 42: Potential Vegetation Hierarchy · boundaries were established by using aquatic rather than terrestrial ecological units (Maxwell et al. 1995, Seaber et al. 1987). Province M332, “middle

38

GENERAL TECHNICAL REPORT PNW-GTR-709

forest—An ecosystem characterized by more or less dense and extensive tree cover,

often consisting of stands varying in characteristics such as species composition,

structure, age class and associated processes, and commonly including meadows,

streams, fish, and wildlife (Helms 1998).

forest land—Land areas of sufficient size to be delineated as a mapping unit and at

least 10 percent stocked by forest trees of any size, including land that formerly

had such tree cover and will be naturally or artificially regenerated to trees (Helms

1998).

forest ecology—An understanding of the basic functional and physiological

processes of forest ecosystems in order to sustain a wide range of forest conditions

and values desired by society (Kimmins 1997).

graminoid—All grasses (Poaceae) and grass-like plants, including sedges

(Cyperaceae) and rushes (Juncaceae) (Patterson et al. 1985).

grassland—Land areas of sufficient size to be delineated as a mapping unit where

the predominant vegetation life form consists of graminoids.

habitat type—A basic ecological unit for classifying lands based on potential

vegetation (Pfister and Arno 1980). It represents, collectively, all parts of the

landscape that support, or have the capability to support, the same plant association

(Alexander 1985). In effect, habitat types are mapping or land classification units;

plant associations are their descriptors or taxonomic labels.

herb land—Land areas of sufficient size to be delineated as a mapping unit where

the predominant vegetation life form consists of herbs (a combination of forbs and

graminoids).

indicator plant—Plant species conveying information about the ecological nature

of a site, such as the nitrogen content of its soil and soil alkalinity or acidity. These

plant species have a sufficiently consistent association with a specific environmental

condition or with other species such that their presence can be used to indicate or

predict the environmental condition or the potential for the other species (Kimmins

1997).

life form—The structure, form, habits, and life history of an organism. In plants,

characteristic life forms such as forest (trees), shrubs, and herbs (forbs/graminoids)

are based on morphological features (physiognomy or predominant stature) that

tend to be associated with different environments (Allaby 1998).

Page 43: Potential Vegetation Hierarchy · boundaries were established by using aquatic rather than terrestrial ecological units (Maxwell et al. 1995, Seaber et al. 1987). Province M332, “middle

39

Potential Vegetation Hierarchy for the Blue Mountains Section of Northeastern Oregon…

map unit—A collection of features defined and named the same in terms of a

unifying theme; each map unit differs in some respect from all others within a

geographic extent (Winthers et al. 2005).

phase—A taxonomic unit in a potential vegetation classification system; the lowest

level in the fine-scale portion of the potential vegetation hierarchy (fig. 2). A phase

represents minor environmental differences within a plant association or habitat

type (Pfister and Arno 1980). A phase is named for an indicator plant species, such

as the mallow ninebark phase of the grand fir/mountain maple habitat type in

central Idaho (Steele et al. 1981).

physiognomy—The growth form and structure (habit) of vegetation in natural

communities (Allaby 1998, Dunster and Dunster 1996). The characteristic feature

or appearance of a plant community or vegetation (Winthers et al. 2005).

physiognomic class—Taxonomic categories or hierarchical units based on vegeta-

tion of similar physiognomy or life form, such as the upland forest, upland shrub

and riparian herb physiognomic classes. Physiognomic class is the highest level in

the midscale portion of the Blue Mountains potential vegetation hierarchy (fig. 2).

plant association—A taxonomic unit in a potential vegetation classification system

(Pfister and Arno 1980). A plant association consists of plant communities with

similar physiognomy (form and structure) and floristics; commonly it is a climax

community (Allaby 1998). It is believed that (1) the individual species in the

association are, to some extent, adapted to each other; (2) the association is made

up of species that have similar environmental requirements; and (3) the association

has some degree of integration (Kimmins 1997). Plant association is one of three

taxonomic units included in the middle level of the fine-scale portion of the Blue

Mountains potential vegetation hierarchy (this middle level is called potential

vegetation type; fig. 2).

plant association group (PAG)—Groupings of plant associations (and other

taxonomic units classified as potential vegetation types; fig. 2) representing similar

ecological environments as characterized by temperature and moisture regimes.

Plant association group is the lowest level in the midscale portion of the Blue

Mountains potential vegetation hierarchy (fig. 2).

Page 44: Potential Vegetation Hierarchy · boundaries were established by using aquatic rather than terrestrial ecological units (Maxwell et al. 1995, Seaber et al. 1987). Province M332, “middle

40

GENERAL TECHNICAL REPORT PNW-GTR-709

plant community—In a potential vegetation classification context, a plant commu-

nity has no particular successional status. Generally, plant communities represent

vegetation types with a restricted geographical distribution or they have such a

small number of sample plots that it is not possible to infer their true successional

status (Johnson and Clausnitzer 1992). Plant community is one of three taxonomic

units included in the middle level of the fine-scale portion of the Blue Mountains

potential vegetation hierarchy (this middle level is called potential vegetation type;

fig. 2).

plant community type—In a potential vegetation classification context, plant

community type is a taxonomic unit with no particular successional status implied

(Dunster and Dunster 1996). Plant community type is one of three taxonomic units

included in the middle level of the fine-scale portion of the Blue Mountains poten-

tial vegetation hierarchy (this middle level is called potential vegetation type;

fig. 2).

plant succession—The process by which a series of different plant communities,

and their associated animals and microbes, successively occupy and replace each

other over time in a particular ecosystem or landscape location following a distur-

bance event (Kimmins 1997). Succession refers to the process of development of an

ecosystem over time (Botkin 1990).

potential natural community (PNC)—The community of plants that would

become established if all successional sequences were completed, without interfer-

ence by people, under existing environmental conditions. Existing environmental

conditions includes the current climate and eroded or damaged soils (Hall et al.

1995).

potential vegetation (PV)—The vegetation that would likely develop on a given

site if all successional sequences were completed without human influence under

present site conditions (USDA Forest Service 1996).

potential vegetation group (PVG)—An aggregation of plant association groups

(PAGs) with similar environmental regimes and dominant plant species. Each

aggregation (PVG) typically includes PAGs representing a predominant tempera-

ture or moisture influence (Powell 2000). Potential vegetation group is the middle

level of the midscale portion of the Blue Mountains potential vegetation hierarchy

(fig. 2).

Page 45: Potential Vegetation Hierarchy · boundaries were established by using aquatic rather than terrestrial ecological units (Maxwell et al. 1995, Seaber et al. 1987). Province M332, “middle

41

Potential Vegetation Hierarchy for the Blue Mountains Section of Northeastern Oregon…

potential vegetation type (PVT)—In the context of this report, a potential

vegetation type is any taxonomic unit (except series) described in fine-scale poten-

tial vegetation classifications for the Blue Mountains section (e.g., Crowe and

Clausnitzer 1997, Johnson 2004, Johnson and Clausnitzer 1992, Johnson and Simon

1987, Johnson and Swanson 2005, Wells 2006); PVT includes plant associations,

plant community types, and plant communities. Potential vegetation type is the

middle level of the fine-scale portion of the Blue Mountains potential vegetation

hierarchy (fig. 2).

province—In the context of this report, a province is one of eight levels in the

national hierarchical framework of terrestrial ecological units. Provinces are

climatic subzones controlled primarily by such continental weather patterns as

length of dry season and duration of cold temperatures. Provinces are also charac-

terized by similar soil orders. Provinces are typically named by using a binomial

system consisting of a geographical location and vegetation type: Bering tundra,

California dry steppe, and middle Rocky Mountain steppe–coniferous forest–alpine

meadow (Cleland et al. 1997, McNab and Avers 1994).

riparian—Related to, living near, or located in conjunction with a wetland; on the

bank of a river or stream but also at the edge of a lake or tidewater. A riparian

plant community significantly influences, and is significantly influenced by, the

neighboring body of water (Helms 1998).

section—In the context of this report, a section is one of eight levels in the national

hierarchical framework of terrestrial ecological units. Sections are broad areas of

similar geomorphic process, stratigraphy, geologic origin, drainage networks,

topography, and regional climate. Section names generally describe the predomi-

nant physiographic feature upon which the ecological unit delineation is based,

such as Flint Hills, Appalachian piedmont, and Blue Mountains (Cleland et al.

1997, McNab and Avers 1994).

seral stage—The identifiable stages in the development of a sere, from an initial

pioneer stage, through various early-seral and midseral stages, to late-seral, subcli-

max, and climax stages. The stages are characterized by different plant communi-

ties, different ages of the dominant vegetation, and by different microclimatic, soil,

and forest conditions (Kimmins 1997). Hall et al. (1995) described four seral

stages:

early seral: clear dominance of seral species (such as western larch, ponderosa

pine, and lodgepole pine); potential natural community (PNC) species are

absent or present in very low numbers.

Page 46: Potential Vegetation Hierarchy · boundaries were established by using aquatic rather than terrestrial ecological units (Maxwell et al. 1995, Seaber et al. 1987). Province M332, “middle

42

GENERAL TECHNICAL REPORT PNW-GTR-709

mid seral: PNC species are increasing in the forest composition as a result of

their active colonization of the site; PNC species are approaching equal

proportions with seral species.

late seral: PNC species are now dominant, although long-lived seral species

(such as ponderosa pine and western larch) may still persist in the plant

community.

potential natural community: the biotic community that one presumes would

be established and maintained over time under present environmental condi-

tions (climax); early-seral species are scarce or absent in the plant composition.

series—A taxonomic unit in a potential vegetation classification system. A series

represents major environmental differences as reflected by a physiognomically

dominant plant species at climax. A forest series is named for the projected climax

tree species—the grand fir series includes every plant association where grand fir is

presumed to be the dominant tree species at climax (Pfister and Arno 1980). Series

is the highest level of the fine-scale portion of the Blue Mountains potential vegeta-

tion hierarchy (fig. 2).

shrub land—Land areas of sufficient size to be delineated as a mapping unit where

the predominant vegetation life form consists of shrubs.

steppe—Open herbaceous vegetation, less than 1 meter high, with the tufts or

plants discrete, yet sufficiently close together to dominate the landscape (Bailey

1998).

structure class (stage)—A stage or recognizable condition relating to the physical

orientation and arrangement of vegetation; the size and arrangement (both vertical

and horizontal) of trees and tree parts (O’Hara et al. 1996, Oliver and Larson

1996).

successional stage—A stage or recognizable condition of a plant community

occurring during its development from bare ground to climax; coniferous forests in

the Blue Mountains progress through six recognized stages: grass-forb, shrub-

seedling, pole-sapling, young, mature, and old growth (Thomas 1979).

taxonomic unit—The basic set of classes or types making up a classification; in

this document, potential vegetation taxonomic units are presented in figure 2.

Page 47: Potential Vegetation Hierarchy · boundaries were established by using aquatic rather than terrestrial ecological units (Maxwell et al. 1995, Seaber et al. 1987). Province M332, “middle

43

Potential Vegetation Hierarchy for the Blue Mountains Section of Northeastern Oregon…

union—A group of plant species used to represent a particular ecological environ-

ment or microclimatic condition; a union typically consists of species that are

similar in life form, phenology, or stature (Sampson 1939). The union includes a

fraction of the total floristic composition for a vegetation type—only the combina-

tion of species that is useful for vegetation classification purposes is designated as a

union (Daubenmire 1968).

upland—Land that generally has a higher elevation than an adjacent alluvial plain,

stream terrace, or riparian zone; or land above the foothill zone for a mountainous

continuum (Dunster and Dunster 1996).

zonal—Areas of soil and vegetation largely controlled by the prevailing regional

climate. Here climate, not exceptional landforms or rock types, determines the

nature of soils and its associated vegetation (Kruckeberg 2002).

Species ListThis list provides codes (symbols) and scientific names for plants mentioned in

the text or in tables and figures. The Pacific Northwest Region (R6) codes and

scientific names provided in the first two columns were taken from published pot-

ential vegetation classifications for the Blue Mountains section (e.g., Crowe and

Clausnitzer 1997, Johnson 2004, Johnson and Clausnitzer 1992, Johnson and Simon

1987, Johnson and Swanson 2005, Wells 2006).

Nomenclature for scientific plant names was revised when the U.S. Depart-

ment of Agriculture adopted a national taxonomy called the PLANTS database.

The third column provides the PLANTS database code for each of the plant species

(USDA NRCS 2004). For plants whose nomenclature recently changed in the

PLANTS database, the suggested synonym and synonym code is also provided as

the fourth and fifth columns in the species list.

Page 48: Potential Vegetation Hierarchy · boundaries were established by using aquatic rather than terrestrial ecological units (Maxwell et al. 1995, Seaber et al. 1987). Province M332, “middle

44

GENERAL TECHNICAL REPORT PNW-GTR-709

R6

PL

AN

TS

Syn

onym

cod

eSc

ient

ific

nam

eco

de

PL

AN

TS

syno

nym

cod

e

AB

GR

Abi

es g

rand

is (

Dou

gl.)

Lin

dl.

AB

GR

AB

LA

2A

bies

las

ioca

rpa

(Hoo

k.)

Nut

t.A

BL

AA

CG

LA

cer

glab

rum

Tor

r.A

CG

LA

DPE

Adi

antu

m p

edat

um L

.A

DPE

AG

CA

Agr

opyr

on c

anin

um (

L.)

Bea

uv.

AG

CA

2E

lym

us c

anin

us (

L.)

L.

EL

CA

11A

GD

IA

gros

tis

dieg

oens

is V

asey

AG

DI

Agr

osti

s pa

llen

s T

rin.

AG

PA8

AG

GL

Ago

seri

s gl

auca

(P

ursh

) R

af.

AG

GL

AG

SPA

grop

yron

spi

catu

m (

Pur

sh)

Scr

ib.

& S

mit

hA

GSP

Pse

udor

oegn

eria

spi

cata

spi

cata

(P

ursh

) A

. L

öve

PSSP

SA

GU

RA

gast

ache

urt

icif

olia

Kun

tze

AG

UR

AL

INA

lnus

inc

ana

(L.)

Moe

nch

AL

IN2

AL

PR

Alo

pecu

rus

prat

ensi

s L

.A

LP

R3

AL

RH

Aln

us r

hom

bifo

lia

Nut

t.A

LR

H2

AL

RU

Aln

us r

ubra

Bon

g.A

LR

U2

AL

SIA

lnus

sin

uata

(R

egel

) R

ydb.

AL

SI3

Aln

us v

irid

is s

inua

ta (

Reg

el)

A.

& D

. L

öve

ALV

ISA

LVA

All

ium

val

idum

Wat

s.A

LVA

AM

AL

Am

elan

chie

r al

nifo

lia

Nut

t.A

MA

L2

APA

NA

pocy

num

and

rosa

emif

oliu

m L

.A

PAN

2A

RA

C2

Are

nari

a ac

ulea

ta W

ats.

AR

AC

2A

RA

RA

rtem

isia

arb

uscu

la N

utt.

AR

AR

8A

RC

AA

rtem

isia

can

a P

ursh

AR

CA

13A

RC

OA

rnic

a co

rdif

olia

Hoo

k.A

RC

O9

AR

LO

3A

rist

ida

long

iset

a S

tevc

.A

RL

O3

Ari

stid

a pu

rpur

ea l

ongi

seta

(S

teud

.) V

asey

AR

PU

LA

RL

OA

rnic

a lo

ngif

olia

D.C

. E

at.

AR

LO

6A

RL

UA

rtem

isia

lud

ovic

iana

Nut

t.A

RL

UA

RN

EA

rcto

stap

hylo

s ne

vade

nsis

Gra

yA

RN

EA

RR

IA

rtem

isia

rig

ida

(Nut

t.) G

ray

AR

RI2

AR

TR

2A

rtem

isia

tri

part

ita

Ryd

b.A

RT

R4

AR

TR

VA

rtem

isia

tri

dent

ata

vase

yana

(R

ydb.

) B

eetl

eA

RT

RV

AS

CA

3A

saru

m c

auda

tum

Lin

dl.

AS

CA

2A

SC

U4

Ast

raga

lus

cusi

ckii

cus

icki

i G

ray

AS

CU

C2

AS

RE

Ast

raga

lus

reve

ntus

Gra

yA

SR

E5

AT

FIA

thyr

ium

fil

ix-f

emin

a (L

.) R

oth.

AT

FIB

ASA

Bal

sam

orhi

za s

agit

tata

(P

ursh

) N

utt.

BA

SA

3B

EG

LB

etul

a gl

andu

losa

Mic

hx.

BE

GL

BE

OC

Bet

ula

occi

dent

alis

Hoo

k.B

EO

C2

BE

RE

Ber

beri

s re

pens

Lin

dl.

BE

RE

Mah

onia

rep

ens

(Lin

dl.)

G.

Don

MA

RE

11B

RC

AB

rom

us c

arin

atus

H.

& A

.B

RC

A5

Page 49: Potential Vegetation Hierarchy · boundaries were established by using aquatic rather than terrestrial ecological units (Maxwell et al. 1995, Seaber et al. 1987). Province M332, “middle

45

Potential Vegetation Hierarchy for the Blue Mountains Section of Northeastern Oregon…

R6

PL

AN

TS

Syn

onym

cod

eSc

ient

ific

nam

eco

de

PL

AN

TS

syno

nym

cod

e

BR

OM

UB

rom

us L

.B

RO

MU

BR

VU

Bro

mus

vul

gari

s (H

ook.

) S

hear

BR

VU

CA

AM

Car

ex a

mpl

ifol

ia B

oott

CA

AM

10C

AA

QC

arex

aqu

atil

is W

ahl.

CA

AQ

CA

CA

4C

arex

can

esce

ns L

.C

AC

A11

CA

CA

Cal

amag

rost

is c

anad

ensi

s (M

ichx

.) B

eauv

.C

AC

A4

CA

CU

Cam

assi

a cu

sick

ii W

ats.

CA

CU

2C

AC

U2

Car

ex c

usic

kii

Mac

k.C

AC

U5

CA

DE

Car

ex d

ewey

ana

Sch

w.

CA

DE

9C

AD

IC

arex

dis

perm

a D

ewey

CA

DI6

CA

EU

Car

ex e

uryc

arpa

Hol

m.

CA

EU

2C

arex

ang

usta

ta B

oott

CA

AN

15C

AG

EC

arex

gey

eri

Boo

ttC

AG

E2

CA

HO

Car

ex h

oodi

i B

oott

CA

HO

5C

AJO

Car

ex j

ones

ii L

. H

. B

aile

yC

AJO

CA

LA

4C

arex

las

ioca

rpa

Ehr

h.C

AL

A11

CA

LA

Car

ex l

aevi

culm

is M

eins

h.C

AL

A13

CA

LA

3C

arex

lan

ugin

osa

Mic

hx.

CA

LA

30C

arex

pel

lita

Muh

l. ex

Wil

ld.

CA

PE

42C

AL

E5

Car

ex l

enti

cula

ris

Mic

hx.

CA

LE

8C

AL

E3

Car

ex l

epor

inel

la M

ack.

CA

LE

9C

AL

EL

2C

arex

len

ticu

lari

s le

ntic

ular

is M

ichx

.C

AL

EL

CA

LI

Car

ex l

imos

a L

.C

AL

I7C

AL

UC

arex

luz

ulin

a O

lney

CA

LU

7C

AM

IC

arex

mic

ropt

era

Mac

k.C

AM

I7C

AM

U2

Car

ex m

uric

ata

L.

CA

MU

7C

AN

EC

arex

neb

rasc

ensi

s D

ewey

CA

NE

2C

AN

I2C

arex

nig

rica

ns C

.A.

Mey

.C

AN

I2C

AN

U4

Car

ex n

udat

a B

oott

CA

NU

5C

AP

EC

arex

pet

asat

a D

ewey

CA

PE

7C

AP

R5

Car

ex p

raeg

raci

lis

Boo

ttC

AP

R5

CA

RE

XC

arex

L.

CA

RE

XC

AR

OC

arex

ros

sii

Boo

ttC

AR

O5

CA

RU

Cal

amag

rost

is r

ubes

cens

Buc

kl.

CA

RU

CA

SC

3C

arex

sci

rpoi

dea

Mic

hx.

CA

SC

10C

AS

C5

Car

ex s

copu

loru

m H

olm

CA

SC

12C

ASH

Car

ex s

held

onii

Mac

kenz

ieC

ASH

CA

SI2

Car

ex s

imul

ata

Mac

k.C

AS

I2C

AS

TC

arex

sti

pata

Muh

l.C

AS

T5

CA

SU

4C

arex

sub

fusc

a B

oott

CA

SU

6

Page 50: Potential Vegetation Hierarchy · boundaries were established by using aquatic rather than terrestrial ecological units (Maxwell et al. 1995, Seaber et al. 1987). Province M332, “middle

46

GENERAL TECHNICAL REPORT PNW-GTR-709

R6

PL

AN

TS

Syn

onym

cod

eSc

ient

ific

nam

eco

de

PL

AN

TS

syno

nym

cod

e

CA

UT

Car

ex u

tric

ulat

a B

oott

CA

UT

CA

VE

Car

ex v

esic

aria

L.

CA

VE

6C

EL

EC

erco

carp

us l

edif

oliu

s N

utt.

CE

LE

3C

ER

E2

Cel

tis

reti

cula

ta T

orr.

CE

RE

2C

elti

s la

evig

ata

reti

cula

ta (

Torr

.) L

. B

enso

nC

EL

AR

CE

VE

Cea

noth

us v

elut

inus

Dou

gl.

ex H

ook.

CE

VE

CH

NO

Cha

mae

cypa

ris

noot

kate

nsis

(D

.Don

) S

pach

CH

NO

Cup

ress

us n

ootk

aten

sis

D.

Don

CU

NO

CH

UM

Chi

map

hila

um

bell

ata

(L.)

Bar

t.C

HU

MC

ILA

2C

inna

lat

ifol

ia (

Tre

vir.)

Gri

seb.

CIL

A2

CL

UN

Cli

nton

ia u

nifl

ora

(Sch

ult.

) K

unth

CL

UN

2C

OO

C2

Cop

tis

occi

dent

alis

(N

utt.)

T.

& G

.C

OO

CC

OS

TC

ornu

s st

olon

ifer

a M

ichx

.C

OS

T4

Cor

nus

seri

cea

seri

cea

L.

CO

SE

SC

RD

OC

rata

egus

dou

glas

ii L

indl

.C

RD

O2

CY

TE

FC

ymop

teru

s te

rebi

nthi

nus

foen

icul

aceu

sC

YT

EF

Pte

ryxi

a te

rebi

nthi

na f

oeni

cula

cea

(Nut

t. e

xP

TT

EF

(T. &

G.)

Cro

nq.

T. &

G.)

Mat

hias

DA

IND

anth

onia

int

erm

edia

Vas

eyD

AIN

DA

UN

Dan

thon

ia u

nisp

icat

a (T

hurb

.) M

unro

ex

Mac

oun

DA

UN

DE

CE

Des

cham

psia

ces

pito

sa (

L.)

Bea

uv.

DE

CE

Des

cham

psia

cae

spit

osa

(L.)

Bea

uv.

DE

CA

18E

LB

EE

leoc

hari

s be

lla

(Pip

er)

Sve

nson

EL

BE

EL

CI

Ely

mus

cin

ereu

s S

crib

n. &

Sm

ith

EL

CI2

Ley

mus

cin

ereu

s (S

crib

n. &

Mer

r.) A

. L

öve

LE

CI4

EL

GL

Ely

mus

gla

ucus

Buc

kl.

EL

GL

EL

PAE

leoc

hari

s pa

lust

ris

(L.)

R.

& S

.E

LPA

3E

LPA

2E

leoc

hari

s pa

ucif

lora

(L

ight

f.)

Lin

kE

LPA

6E

leoc

hari

s qu

inqu

eflo

ra (

F.X

. H

artm

ann)

Sch

war

zE

LQ

U2

EQ

AR

Equ

iset

um a

rven

se L

.E

QA

RE

RD

OE

riog

onum

dou

glas

ii B

enth

.E

RD

OE

RF

LE

riog

onum

fla

vum

Nut

t.E

RF

L4

ER

HE

Eri

ogon

um h

erac

leoi

des

Nut

t.E

RH

E2

ER

IOG

Eri

ogon

um L

.E

RIO

GE

RP

UE

rige

ron

pum

ilus

Nut

t.E

RP

U2

ER

ST

2E

riog

onum

str

ictu

m B

enth

.E

RS

T4

ER

UM

Eri

ogon

um u

mbe

llat

um T

orr.

ER

UM

FEID

Fest

uca

idah

oens

is E

lmer

FEID

FE

SC

Fest

uca

scab

rell

a To

rr.

ex H

ook.

[va

r. m

ajor

Vas

ey]

FE

SC

MF

estu

ca c

ampe

stri

s R

ydb.

FE

CA

4FE

VI

Fest

uca

viri

dula

Vas

eyFE

VI

FR

AL

CF

rase

ra a

lbic

auli

s cu

sick

ii C

.L.

Hit

chc.

FR

AL

C2

GE

TR

Geu

m t

rifl

orum

Pur

shG

ET

RG

LE

LG

lyce

ria

elat

a (N

ash

ex R

ydb.

) M

.E.

Jone

sG

LE

LG

lyce

ria

stri

ata

(Lam

.) A

.S.

Hit

chc.

GL

ST

GL

NE

Glo

ssop

etal

on n

evad

ense

Gra

yG

LN

EG

loss

opet

alon

spi

nesc

ens

arid

um M

.E.

Jone

sG

LSP

AG

YD

RG

ymno

carp

ium

dry

opte

ris

(L.)

New

m.

GY

DR

Page 51: Potential Vegetation Hierarchy · boundaries were established by using aquatic rather than terrestrial ecological units (Maxwell et al. 1995, Seaber et al. 1987). Province M332, “middle

47

Potential Vegetation Hierarchy for the Blue Mountains Section of Northeastern Oregon…

R6

PL

AN

TS

Syn

onym

cod

eSc

ient

ific

nam

eco

de

PL

AN

TS

syno

nym

cod

e

HE

LA

Her

acle

um l

anat

um M

ichx

.H

EL

A4

Her

acle

um m

axim

um B

artr

.H

EM

A80

HO

DI

Hol

odis

cus

disc

olor

(P

ursh

) M

axim

.H

OD

IIV

GO

Ives

ia g

ordo

nii

(Hoo

k.)

T. &

G.

IVG

OJU

BA

Junc

us b

alti

cus

Wil

ld.

JUB

AJu

ncus

arc

ticu

s li

ttor

alis

(E

ngel

m.)

Hul

tén

JUA

RL

JUC

O4

Juni

peru

s co

mm

unis

L.

JUC

O6

JUD

RJu

ncus

dru

mm

ondi

i E

. M

ey.

JUD

RJU

OC

Juni

peru

s oc

cide

ntal

is H

ook.

JUO

CJU

PAJu

ncus

par

ryi

Eng

elm

.JU

PAJU

SC

Juni

peru

s sc

opul

orum

Sar

g.JU

SC

2JU

TE

Junc

us t

enui

s W

illd

.JU

TE

KA

MI

Kal

mia

mic

roph

ylla

(H

ook.

) H

elle

rK

AM

IK

OC

RK

oele

ria

cris

tata

Per

s.K

OC

RK

oele

ria

mac

rant

ha (

Led

eb.)

J.A

. S

chul

tes

KO

MA

LE

CO

WL

ewis

ia c

olum

bian

a w

allo

wen

sis

C.L

. H

itch

c.L

EC

OW

2L

ewis

ia c

olum

bian

a w

allo

wen

sis

C.L

. H

itch

c.L

EC

OW

LE

GL

Led

um g

land

ulos

um N

utt.

LE

GL

LE

PY

Lew

isia

pyg

mae

a (G

ray)

Rob

ins.

LE

PY

2L

IBO

2L

inna

ea b

orea

lis

L.

LIB

O3

LIC

A2

Lig

usti

cum

can

byi

Cou

lt.

& R

ose

LIC

A2

LIN

UL

inan

thas

trum

nut

tall

ii (

Gra

y) E

wan

LIN

U4

Lep

tosi

phon

nut

tall

ii n

utta

llii

(G

ray)

J.M

. P

orte

rL

EN

UN

& L

.A.

John

son

LO

INL

onic

era

invo

lucr

ata

(Ric

h.)

Ban

ks e

x S

pren

g.L

OIN

5L

OL

EL

omat

ium

lep

toca

rpum

(T.

& G

.) C

oult

. &

Ros

eL

OL

E2

Lom

atiu

m b

icol

or l

epto

carp

um (

Torr

.L

OB

IL&

Gra

y) S

chle

ssm

anL

UA

R3

Lup

inus

arg

ente

us P

ursh

LU

AR

3L

UH

IL

uzul

a hi

tchc

ocki

i H

ämet

-Aht

iL

UH

I4L

uzul

a gl

abra

ta h

itch

cock

ii (

Häm

et-A

hti)

Dor

nL

UG

LH

LU

LA

2L

upin

us l

axif

loru

s D

ougl

. ex

Lin

dl.

LU

LA

3L

upin

us a

rgen

teus

lax

iflo

rus

(Dou

gl.

ex L

indl

.)L

UA

RL

5D

orn

LU

PIN

Lup

inus

L.

LU

PIN

LU

SE

Lup

inus

ser

iceu

s P

ursh

LU

SE

4M

AG

LM

adia

glo

mer

ata

Hoo

k.M

AG

L2

ME

BU

Mel

ica

bulb

osa

Gey

er e

x P

orte

r &

Cou

lt.

ME

BU

ME

FE

Men

zies

ia f

erru

gine

a S

mit

hM

EF

EM

ET

RM

enya

nthe

s tr

ifol

iata

L.

ME

TR

3M

ILE

Mim

ulus

lew

isii

Pur

shM

ILE

2M

OO

DM

onar

dell

a od

orat

issi

ma

Ben

th.

MO

OD

NU

PON

upha

r po

lyse

pala

Eng

elm

.N

UPO

2N

upha

r lu

tea

poly

sepa

la (

Eng

elm

.) E

.O.

Bea

lN

UL

UP

OPP

OO

punt

ia p

olya

cant

ha H

aw.

OPP

OO

RE

XO

ryzo

psis

exi

gua

Thu

rb.

OR

EX

Pip

tath

erum

exi

guum

(T

hurb

.) D

orn

PIE

X3

PE

CO

Ped

icul

aris

con

tort

a B

enth

.P

EC

O

Page 52: Potential Vegetation Hierarchy · boundaries were established by using aquatic rather than terrestrial ecological units (Maxwell et al. 1995, Seaber et al. 1987). Province M332, “middle

48

GENERAL TECHNICAL REPORT PNW-GTR-709

R6

PL

AN

TS

Syn

onym

cod

eSc

ient

ific

nam

eco

de

PL

AN

TS

syno

nym

cod

e

PE

FR

PPe

tasi

tes

frig

idus

pal

mat

us (

Ait

.) C

ronq

.P

EF

RP

PEG

AP

enst

emon

gai

rdne

ri H

ook.

PEG

APE

NST

Pen

stem

on S

chm

idel

PEN

STP

ER

A3

Pera

phyl

lum

ram

osis

sim

um N

utt.

PE

RA

4P

ES

P2

Pen

stem

on s

patu

latu

s P

enne

llP

ES

P2

PHA

RP

hala

ris

arun

dina

cea

L.

PH

AR

3PH

AU

Phl

ox a

ustr

omon

tana

Cov

.PH

AU

3P

HC

A3

Phy

soca

rpus

cap

itat

us (

Pur

sh)

Kun

tze

PH

CA

11P

HC

O2

Phl

ox c

olub

rina

Whe

rry

& C

onst

ance

PH

CO

10P

HE

MP

hyll

odoc

e em

petr

ifor

mis

(S

m.)

D.

Don

PH

EM

PH

LE

2P

hila

delp

hus

lew

isii

Pur

shP

HL

E4

PHL

OX

Phl

ox L

.PH

LO

XP

HM

AP

hyso

carp

us m

alva

ceus

(G

reen

e) K

untz

eP

HM

A5

PHO

RP

hysa

ria

oreg

ona

S.

Wat

s.P

HO

R2

PIA

LP

inus

alb

icau

lis

Eng

elm

.PI

AL

PIC

OP

inus

con

tort

a D

ougl

. ex

Lou

d.PI

CO

PIE

NP

icea

eng

elm

anni

i Pa

rry

ex E

ngel

m.

PIE

NPI

FLP

inus

fle

xili

s Ja

mes

PIF

L2

PIM

OP

inus

mon

tico

la D

ougl

. ex

D.

Don

PIM

O3

PIPO

Pin

us p

onde

rosa

Dou

gl.

ex L

oud.

PIPO

POB

UPo

a bu

lbos

a L

.PO

BU

POC

UPo

a cu

sick

ii V

asey

PO

CU

3PO

FRP

oten

till

a fr

utic

osa

L.

PO

FR

4D

asip

hora

fru

tico

sa f

lori

bund

a (P

ursh

) K

arte

szD

AFR

FPO

GL

Pot

enti

lla

glan

dulo

sa L

indl

.P

OG

L9

PO

MU

Poly

stic

hum

mun

itum

(K

aulf

.) P

resl

.P

OM

UPO

NE

WPo

a ne

rvos

a w

heel

eri

(Vas

ey)

C.L

. H

itch

c.PO

NE

WPo

a w

heel

eri

Vas

eyPO

WH

2PO

PHP

olyg

onum

phy

tola

ccif

oliu

m M

eisn

. ex

Sm

all

POPH

POPR

Poa

prat

ensi

s L

.PO

PRPO

PUP

olem

oniu

m p

ulch

erri

mum

Hoo

k.PO

PU3

POSA

3P

oa s

andb

ergi

i V

asey

PO

SA

12Po

a se

cund

a J.

Pre

slPO

SEP

OT

R2

Popu

lus

tric

hoca

rpa

T. &

G.

ex H

ook.

PO

TR

15P

opul

us b

alsa

mif

era

tric

hoca

rpa

POB

AT

(T. &

G. e

x H

ook.

) B

rays

haw

PO

TR

Pop

ulus

tre

mul

oide

s M

ichx

.P

OT

R5

PR

EM

Pru

nus

emar

gina

ta (

Dou

gl.)

Wal

pers

PR

EM

PS

ME

Pse

udot

suga

men

zies

ii (

Mir

bel)

Fra

nco

PS

ME

PTA

QP

teri

dium

aqu

ilin

um (

L.)

Kuh

nPT

AQ

PUPA

Puc

cine

llia

pau

cifl

ora

(J.

Pre

sl.)

Mun

zPU

PA3

Torr

eyoc

hloa

pal

lida

pau

cifl

ora

(J.

Pre

sl)

J.I.

Dav

isT

OPA

P3P

UT

RP

ursh

ia t

ride

ntat

a (P

ursh

) D

C.

PU

TR

2

Page 53: Potential Vegetation Hierarchy · boundaries were established by using aquatic rather than terrestrial ecological units (Maxwell et al. 1995, Seaber et al. 1987). Province M332, “middle

49

Potential Vegetation Hierarchy for the Blue Mountains Section of Northeastern Oregon…

R6

PL

AN

TS

Syn

onym

cod

eSc

ient

ific

nam

eco

de

PL

AN

TS

syno

nym

cod

e

RH

AL

2R

ham

nus

alni

foli

a L’

Hér

RH

AL

RH

AL

Rho

dode

ndro

n al

bifl

orum

Hoo

k.R

HA

L2

RH

GL

Rhu

s gl

abra

L.

RH

GL

RIB

ES

Rib

es L

.R

IBE

SR

IMO

Rib

es m

onti

genu

m M

cCla

tchi

eR

IMO

2R

OSA

Ros

a L

.R

OS

A5

RU

BA

Rub

us b

arto

nian

us P

eck

RU

BA

RU

BU

SR

ubus

L.

RU

BU

SR

UD

IR

ubus

dis

colo

r W

eihe

& N

ees

RU

DI2

Rub

us a

rmen

iacu

s F

ocke

RU

AR

9R

UO

CR

udbe

ckia

occ

iden

tali

s N

utt.

RU

OC

2R

UPA

Rub

us p

arvi

flor

us N

utt.

RU

PAS

AA

R4

Saxi

frag

a ar

guta

D.

Don

SA

AR

13Sa

xifr

aga

odon

tolo

ma

Pip

erSA

OD

2S

AA

R5

Sali

x ar

ctic

a P

all.

SA

AR

27S

AB

O2

Sali

x bo

othi

i D

orn

SA

BO

2S

AC

O2

Sali

x co

mm

utat

a B

ebb.

SA

CO

2SA

DR

Sali

x dr

umm

ondi

ana

Bar

ratt

SAD

RSA

EA

Sali

x ea

stw

oodi

ae C

ocke

rell

ex

Hel

ler

SAE

ASA

EX

Sali

x ex

igua

Nut

t.SA

EX

SAFA

Sali

x fa

rria

e B

all

SAFA

SA

LA

2Sa

lix

lasi

andr

a B

enth

.S

AL

A5

Sali

x lu

cida

las

iand

ra (

Ben

th.)

E.

Mur

r.SA

LU

LS

AL

ESa

lix

lem

mon

ii B

ebb.

SA

LE

SAL

IXSa

lix

L.

SAL

IXSA

RI

Sali

x ri

gida

Muh

l. [m

acke

nzie

ana

(Hoo

k.)

Cro

nq.]

SA

RIM

4Sa

lix

prol

ixa

And

erss

.S

AP

R3

SASC

Sali

x sc

oule

rian

a B

arra

ttSA

SCSA

SI2

Sali

x si

tche

nsis

San

son

SASI

2SA

TW

Sali

x tw

eedy

i (B

ebb.

) B

all

SAT

WSC

AN

Scut

ella

ria

angu

stif

olia

Pur

shS

CA

N3

SC

MI

Scir

pus

mic

roca

rpus

Pre

sl.

SC

MI2

SE

LA

2Se

dum

lan

ceol

atum

Tor

r.S

EL

AS

ET

RSe

neci

o tr

iang

ular

is H

ook.

SE

TR

SIH

YSi

tani

on h

ystr

ix (

Nut

t.) J

.G.

Sm

.SI

HY

Ely

mus

ely

moi

des

elym

oide

s (R

af.)

Sw

ezey

EL

EL

ESP

AN

Spar

gani

um a

ngus

tifo

lium

Mic

hx.

SPA

N2

SP

BE

Spir

aea

betu

lifo

lia

Pall

.S

PB

E2

SP

CR

Spor

obol

us c

rypt

andr

us (

Torr

.) G

ray

SP

CR

Page 54: Potential Vegetation Hierarchy · boundaries were established by using aquatic rather than terrestrial ecological units (Maxwell et al. 1995, Seaber et al. 1987). Province M332, “middle

50

GENERAL TECHNICAL REPORT PNW-GTR-709

R6

PL

AN

TS

Syn

onym

cod

eSc

ient

ific

nam

eco

de

PL

AN

TS

syno

nym

cod

e

STA

MSt

rept

opus

am

plex

ifol

ius

(L.)

DC

.S

TAM

2S

TL

E2

Stip

a le

mm

onii

(V

asey

) S

crib

n.S

TL

E2

Ach

nath

erum

lem

mon

ii l

emm

onii

(V

asey

) B

arkw

orth

AC

LE

LS

TO

CSt

ipa

occi

dent

alis

Thu

rb.

ex W

ats.

ST

OC

2A

chna

ther

um o

ccid

enta

le o

ccid

enta

le (

Thu

rb.)

AC

OC

OB

arkw

orth

SYA

LSy

mph

oric

arpo

s al

bus

(L.)

Bla

keSY

AL

SYO

RSy

mph

oric

arpo

s or

eoph

ilus

Gra

yS

YO

R2

TAB

RTa

xus

brev

ifol

ia N

utt.

TAB

R2

TR

CA

3Tr

autv

ette

ria

caro

lini

ensi

s (W

alt.

) V

ail

TR

CA

TR

MA

Trif

oliu

m m

acro

ceph

alum

(P

ursh

) P

oir.

TR

MA

3T

SM

ET

suga

mer

tens

iana

(B

ong.

) C

arr.

TS

ME

TY

LA

Typh

a la

tifo

lia

L.

TY

LA

VA

ME

Vacc

iniu

m m

embr

anac

eum

Dou

gl.

ex H

ook.

VA

ME

VA

SCVa

ccin

ium

sco

pari

um L

eib.

VA

SCV

AU

LVa

ccin

ium

uli

gino

sum

L.

VAU

LV

EA

MVe

roni

ca a

mer

ican

a S

chw

ein.

ex

Ben

th.

VE

AM

2V

ER

AT

Vera

trum

L.

VE

RA

TX

ET

EX

erop

hyll

um t

enax

(P

ursh

) N

utt.

XE

TE

Page 55: Potential Vegetation Hierarchy · boundaries were established by using aquatic rather than terrestrial ecological units (Maxwell et al. 1995, Seaber et al. 1987). Province M332, “middle

51

Potential Vegetation Hierarchy for the Blue Mountains Section of Northeastern Oregon…

AcknowledgmentsThe authors acknowledge the following individuals for their contributions to the

development of information presented in this report (note that national forest

affiliation and work location information was accurate when the potential vegeta-

tion work described in this report was completed).

Charlene Bucha-Gentry, Umatilla National Forest, Heppner, OR

Katie Countryman, Wallowa-Whitman National Forest, Baker City, OR

Steve Fletcher, Wallowa-Whitman National Forest, Baker City, OR

Bill Gamble, Malheur National Forest, John Day, OR

Les Holsapple, Umatilla National Forest, Pendleton, OR

Lyle Jensen, Umatilla National Forest, Pendleton, OR

Don Justice, Umatilla National Forest, Pendleton, OR

John Keersemaker, Umatilla National Forest, Pendleton, OR

Bill McArthur, Malheur National Forest, John Day, OR

Chuck Quimby, Wallowa-Whitman National Forest, Baker City, OR

Scott Riley, Umatilla National Forest, Pendleton, OR

Victoria Rockwell, Wallowa-Whitman National Forest, Baker City, OR

Ray Smith, Malheur National Forest, John Day, OR

Ed Uebler, Malheur National Forest, John Day, OR

Karl Urban, Umatilla National Forest, Pendleton, OR

Gene Yates, Malheur National Forest, John Day, OR

This report benefited greatly from technical peer review by Craig Busskohl

(soil scientist, Umatilla National Forest), Tom DeMeo (plant ecologist, Pacific

Northwest Regional Office), Becky Gravenmier (planning specialist, Pacific

Northwest Research Station), Paul Oester (extension forester for Union County,

Oregon State University), Ayn Shlisky (plant ecologist, The Nature Conservancy)

and Mike Simpson (plant ecologist, Central Oregon Area Ecology Program).

Page 56: Potential Vegetation Hierarchy · boundaries were established by using aquatic rather than terrestrial ecological units (Maxwell et al. 1995, Seaber et al. 1987). Province M332, “middle

52

GENERAL TECHNICAL REPORT PNW-GTR-709

ReferencesAgee, J.K. 1993. Fire ecology of Pacific Northwest forests. Washington, DC:

Island Press. 493 p.

Agee, J.K. 1998. The landscape ecology of western forest fire regimes. Northwest

Science. 72(special issue): 24–34.

Alexander, R.R. 1985. Major habitat types, community types, and plant

communities in the Rocky Mountains. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-123. Fort Collins,

CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest

and Range Experiment Station. 105 p.

Allaby, M., ed. 1998. The concise Oxford dictionary of ecology. 2nd ed. New York:

Oxford University Press. 440 p.

Bailey, R.G. 1995. Description of the ecoregions of the United States. Misc. Publ.

1391. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 108 p.

Bailey, R.G. 1996. Ecosystem geography. New York: Springer-Verlag. 204 p.

Bailey, R.G. 1998. Ecoregions map of North America: explanatory note. Misc.

Publ. 1548. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service.

10 p.

Bergeron, Y.; Bouchard, A. 1984. Use of ecological groups in analysis and

classification of plant communities in a section of western Quebec. Vegetatio.

56: 45–63.

Beukema, S.J.; Kurz, W.A.; Pinkham, C.B.; Milosheva, K.; Frid, L. 2003.

Vegetation dynamics development tool, user’s guide, version 4.4. Vancouver,

BC: Essa Technologies Ltd. 234 p.

Blackwood, J.D. 1998 (December 11). Historical percentages for use with HRV

analyses; file designation 2430/2600 memorandum to District Rangers.

Pendleton, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Umatilla

National Forest, Supervisor’s Office. 8 p. On file with: USDA Forest Service,

Umatilla National Forest, 2517 SW Hailey Avenue, Pendleton, OR 97801.

Blumer, J.C. 1911. Change of aspect with altitude. Plant World. 14: 236–248.

Botanical Resources Group. 2004. A pocket checklist of plants of the Umatilla

National Forest, Oregon and Washington. 7th ed. FS-SO-06-04. Pendleton, OR:

U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Umatilla National Forest.

152 p.

Page 57: Potential Vegetation Hierarchy · boundaries were established by using aquatic rather than terrestrial ecological units (Maxwell et al. 1995, Seaber et al. 1987). Province M332, “middle

53

Potential Vegetation Hierarchy for the Blue Mountains Section of Northeastern Oregon…

Botkin, D.B. 1990. Discordant harmonies: a new ecology for the twenty-first

century. New York: Oxford University Press. 241 p.

Brohman, R.; Bryant, L., eds. 2005. Existing vegetation classification and

mapping technical guide. Gen. Tech. Rep. WO-67. Washington, DC: U.S.

Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Ecosystem Management

Coordination Staff. 305 p.

Brown, R.T.; Agee, J.K.; Franklin, J.F. 2004. Forest restoration and fire:

principles in the context of place. Conservation Biology. 18(4): 903–912.

Bryce, S.A.; Omernik, J.M. 1997. Section 2–level IV ecoregions of the Blue

Mountains ecoregion of Oregon, Washington, and Idaho. In: Clarke, S.E.;

Bryce, S.A., eds. Hierarchical subdivisions of the Columbia Plateau and Blue

Mountains ecoregions, Oregon and Washington. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-

395. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific

Northwest Research Station: 24–55.

Clarke, S.E.; Bryce, S.A., eds. 1997. Hierarchical subdivisions of the Columbia

Plateau and Blue Mountains ecoregions, Oregon and Washington. Gen. Tech.

Rep. PNW-GTR-395. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest

Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 114 p.

Clausnitzer, R.R. 1993. The grand fir series of northeastern Oregon and

southeastern Washington: successional stages and management guide. Tech.

Publ. R6-ECO-TP-050-93. [Place of publication unknown]: U.S. Department

of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Region, Wallowa-Whitman

National Forest. 193 p.

Cleland, D.T.; Avers, P.E.; McNab, W.H.; Jensen, M.E.; Bailey, R.G.; King,

T.; Russell, W.E. 1997. National hierarchical framework of ecological units.

In: Boyce, M.S.; Haney, A., eds. Ecosystem management: applications for

sustainable forest and wildlife resources. New Haven, CT: Yale University

Press: 181-200.

Cochran, P.H.; Geist, J.M.; Clemens, D.L.; Clausnitzer, R.R.; Powell, D.C.

1994. Suggested stocking levels for forest stands in northeastern Oregon and

southeastern Washington. Res. Note PNW-RN-513. Portland, OR: U.S.

Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station.

21 p.

Page 58: Potential Vegetation Hierarchy · boundaries were established by using aquatic rather than terrestrial ecological units (Maxwell et al. 1995, Seaber et al. 1987). Province M332, “middle

54

GENERAL TECHNICAL REPORT PNW-GTR-709

Comer, P.; Faber-Langendoen, D.; Evans, R.; Gawler, S.; Josse, C.; Kittel,

G.; Menard, S.; Pyne, M.; Reid, M.; Schulz, K.; Snow, K.; Teague, J.

2003. Ecological systems of the United States: a working classification of U.S.

terrestrial ecosystems. Arlington, VA: NatureServe. 75 p.

Cook, J.E. 1996. Implications of modern successional theory for habitat typing: a

review. Forest Science. 42(1): 67–75.

Crane, M.F.; Fischer, W.C. 1986. Fire ecology of the forest habitat types of

central Idaho. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-218. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of

Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station. 86 p.

Crowe, E.A.; Clausnitzer, R.R. 1997. Mid-montane wetland plant associations of

the Malheur, Umatilla and Wallowa-Whitman National Forests. Tech. Pap. R6-

NR-ECOL-TP-22-97. Baker City, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest

Service, Pacific Northwest Region, Wallowa-Whitman National Forest. 299 p.

Daubenmire, R. 1952. Forest vegetation of northern Idaho and adjacent

Washington, and its bearing on concepts of vegetation classification. Ecological

Monographs. 22(4): 301–330.

Daubenmire, R. 1961. Vegetative indicators of rate of height growth in ponderosa

pine. Forest Science. 7(1): 24–34.

Daubenmire, R. 1966. Vegetation: identification of typal communities. Science.

151: 291–298.

Daubenmire, R. 1968. Plant communities, a textbook of plant synecology. New

York: Harper and Row. 300 p.

Daubenmire, R. 1973. A comparison of approaches to the mapping of forest land

for intensive management. Forestry Chronicle. 49(2): 87–91.

Daubenmire, R. 1976. The use of vegetation in assessing the productivity of forest

lands. Botanical Review. 42(2): 115–143.

Davis, L.S.; Johnson, K.N.; Bettinger, P.S.; Howard, T.E. 2001. Forest

management: to sustain ecological, economic, and social values. 4th ed. New

York: McGraw-Hill. 804 p.

Deitschmann, G.H. 1973. Mapping of habitat types throughout a national forest.

Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-11. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest

Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station. 14 p.

Page 59: Potential Vegetation Hierarchy · boundaries were established by using aquatic rather than terrestrial ecological units (Maxwell et al. 1995, Seaber et al. 1987). Province M332, “middle

55

Potential Vegetation Hierarchy for the Blue Mountains Section of Northeastern Oregon…

Despain, D.G.; Weaver, T.; Aspinall, R.J. 2001. A rule-based model for mapping

potential exotic plant distribution. Western North American Naturalist. 61(4):

428–433.

Dunster, J.; Dunster, K. 1996. Dictionary of natural resource management.

Vancouver, BC: UBC Press. 363 p.

Emmingham, W.H.; Oester, P.T.; Fitzgerald, S.A.; Filip, G.M.; Edge, W.D.

2005. Ecology and management of eastern Oregon forests: a comprehensive

manual for forest managers. Manual 12. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State

University, Extension Service. 208 p.

Everett, R.L.; Lehmkuhl, J.F. 1999. Restoring biodiversity on public forest lands

through disturbance and patch management irrespective of land-use allocation.

In: Baydack, R.K.; Campa, H.; Haufler, J.B., eds. Practical approaches to the

conservation of biological diversity. Washington, DC: Island Press: 87–105.

Eyre, F.H. 1980. Forest cover types of the United States and Canada. Washington,

DC: Society of American Foresters. 148 p.

Flint, H.R. 1925. Fire resistance of northern Rocky Mountain conifers. Idaho

Forester. 7: 7–10, 41–43.

Franklin, J.F.; Agee, J.K. 2003. Forging a science-based national forest fire

policy. Issues in Science and Technology. 20(1): 59–66.

Garrison, G.A.; Skovlin, J.M.; Poulton, C.E.; Winward, A.H. 1976. Northwest

range plant names and symbols for ecosystem inventory and analysis. 4th ed.

Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-46. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture,

Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station. 263 p.

Graham, R.T.; McCaffrey, S.; Jain, T.B., tech. eds. 2004. Science basis for

changing forest structure to modify wildfire behavior and severity. Gen. Tech.

Rep. RMRS-GTR-120. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture,

Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Experiment Station. 43 p.

Habeck, J.R.; Mutch, R.W. 1973. Fire-dependent forests in the northern Rocky

Mountains. Quaternary Research. 3: 408–424.

Hall, F.C. 1989. Plant community classification: from concept to application.

In: Ferguson, D.E.; Morgan, P.; Johnson, F.D., comps. Proceedings—land

classifications based on vegetation: applications for resource management.

Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-257. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture,

Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station: 41–48.

Page 60: Potential Vegetation Hierarchy · boundaries were established by using aquatic rather than terrestrial ecological units (Maxwell et al. 1995, Seaber et al. 1987). Province M332, “middle

56

GENERAL TECHNICAL REPORT PNW-GTR-709

Hall, F.C. 1998. Pacific Northwest ecoclass codes for seral and potential natural

communities. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-418. Portland, OR: U.S. Department

of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 290 p.

Hall, F.C.; Bryant, L.; Clausnitzer, R.; Geier-Hayes, K.; Keane, R.; Kertis, J.;

Shlisky, A.; Steele, R. 1995. Definitions and codes for seral status and

structure of vegetation. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-363. Portland, OR: U.S.

Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station.

39 p.

Hann, W.; Havlina, D.; Shlisky, A. 2005. Interagency fire regime condition class

guidebook, version 1.2. http://www.frcc.gov. (January 2006).

Hann, W.J.; Jones, J.L.; Karl, M.G.; Hessburg, P.F.; Keane, R.E.; Long,

D.G.; Menakis, J.P.; McNicoll, C.H.; Leonard, S.G.; Gravenmier, R.A.;

Smith, B.G. 1997. Chapter 3: landscape dynamics of the basin. In: Quigley,

T.M.; Arbelbide, S.J., tech. eds. An assessment of ecosystem components in the

interior Columbia basin and portions of the Klamath and Great Basins: volume

2. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-405. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of

Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station: 337–1055.

Hanson, E. 2000. PLANTS; alphabetical list, current and old names. Portland,

OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Portland Forestry

Sciences Laboratory, Forest Inventory and Analysis. 436 p.

Haynes, R.W.; Graham, R.T.; Quigley, T.M. 1996. A framework for ecosystem

management in the interior Columbia basin and portions of the Klamath and

Great Basins. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-374. Portland, OR: U.S. Department

of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 68 p.

Helms, J.A., ed. 1998. The dictionary of forestry. Bethesda, MD: Society of

American Foresters. 210 p.

Huff, M.H.; Ottmar, R.D.; Alvarado, E.; Everett, R.L.; Vihnanek, R.E.;

Lehmkuhl, J.F.; Hessburg, P.F. 1995. Historical and current forest landscapes

in eastern Oregon and Washington. Part II: Linking vegetation characteristics to

potential fire behavior and related smoke production. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-

GTR-355. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service,

Pacific Northwest Research Station. 43 p.

Huston, M.; Smith, T. 1987. Plant succession: life history and competition.

American Naturalist. 130(2): 168–198.

Page 61: Potential Vegetation Hierarchy · boundaries were established by using aquatic rather than terrestrial ecological units (Maxwell et al. 1995, Seaber et al. 1987). Province M332, “middle

57

Potential Vegetation Hierarchy for the Blue Mountains Section of Northeastern Oregon…

Jensen, M.; Goodman, I.; Brewer, K.; Frost, T.; Ford, G.; Nesser, J. 1997.

Chapter 2: biophysical environments of the basin. In: Quigley, T.M.; Arbelbide,

S.J., tech. eds. An assessment of ecosystem components in the interior

Columbia basin and portions of the Klamath and Great Basins: volume 1. Gen.

Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-405. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture,

Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station: 99–320.

Johnson, C.G., Jr. 2004. Alpine and subalpine vegetation of the Wallowa, Seven

Devils and Blue Mountains. Tech. Publ. R6-NR-ECOL-TP-03-04. Portland,

OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Region.

612 p.

Johnson, C.G., Jr.; Clausnitzer, R.R. 1992. Plant associations of the Blue and

Ochoco Mountains. Tech. Publ. R6-ERW-TP-036-92. Portland, OR: U.S.

Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Region, Wallowa-

Whitman National Forest. 164 p.

Johnson, C.G., Jr.; Simon, S.A. 1987. Plant associations of the Wallowa-Snake

province. Tech. Publ. R6-ECOL-TP-225b-86. Baker City, OR: U.S.

Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Region, Wallowa-

Whitman National Forest. 272 p.

Johnson, C.G., Jr.; Swanson, D.K. 2005. Bunchgrass plant communities of the

Blue and Ochoco Mountains: a guide for managers. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-

GTR-641. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service,

Pacific Northwest Research Station. 119 p.

Johnson, K.N.; Swanson, F.; Herring, M.; Greene, S., eds. 1999. Bioregional

assessments: science at the crossroads of management and policy. Washington,

DC: Island Press. 398 p.

Kelly, A.; Powell, D.C.; Riggs, R.A. 2005. Predicting potential natural vegetation

in an interior Northwest landscape using classification tree modeling and a GIS.

Western Journal of Applied Forestry. 20(2): 117–127.

Kimmins, J.P. 1997. Forest ecology; a foundation for sustainable management. 2nd

ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. 596 p.

Klinka, K.; Carter R.E. 1980. Ecology and silviculture of the most productive

ecosystems for growth of Douglas-fir in southwestern British Columbia. Land

Management Rep. 6. Victoria, BC: British Columbia Ministry of Forests,

Information Services Branch. 12 p.

Page 62: Potential Vegetation Hierarchy · boundaries were established by using aquatic rather than terrestrial ecological units (Maxwell et al. 1995, Seaber et al. 1987). Province M332, “middle

58

GENERAL TECHNICAL REPORT PNW-GTR-709

Kruckeberg, A.R. 2002. Geology and plant life: the effects of landforms and rock

types on plants. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press. 362 p.

Küchler, A.W. 1964. Potential natural vegetation of the conterminous United

States: manual to accompany the map. Spec. Publ. 36. New York: American

Geographical Society. 156 p.

Kurz, W.A.; Beukema, S.J.; Klenner, W.; Greenough, J.A.; Robinson, D.C.E.;

Sharpe, A.D.; Webb, T.M. 2000. TELSA: the tool for exploratory landscape

scenario analyses. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 27: 227–242.

Levin, S.A. 1992. The problem of pattern and scale in ecology. Ecology. 73:

1943–1967.

Losensky, B.J. 1994. Historical vegetation types of the interior Columbia River

basin. Prepared under contract INT-94951-RJVA. Portland, OR: U.S.

Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station,

Interior Columbia Basin Ecosystem Management Project. 108 p. http://

www.icbemp.gov/science/losensky.pdf. (January 2006).

Manning, M.E.; Engelking, L.D. 1997. Report on the riparian plant associa-

tion groups and associated valley bottom types of the Columbia River basin.

Second review draft of unpublished report prepared for USDA Forest Ser-

vice. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific

Northwest Research Station, Interior Columbia Basin Ecosystem Management

Project. 133 p. http://www.icbemp.gov/science/manning.pdf. (January 2006).

Maxwell, J.R.; Edwards, C.J.; Jensen, M.E.; Paustian, S.J.; Parrott, H.; Hill,

D.M. 1995. A hierarchical framework of aquatic ecological units in North

America (nearctic zone). Gen. Tech. Rep. NC-176. St. Paul, MN: U.S.

Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment

Station. 72 p.

McCook, L.J. 1994. Understanding ecological community succession: causal

models and theories, a review. Vegetatio. 110: 115–147.

McCune, B.; Allen, T.F.H. 1985a. Forest dynamics in the Bitterroot Canyons,

Montana. Canadian Journal of Botany. 63: 377–383.

McCune, B.; Allen, T.F.H. 1985b. Will similar forests develop on similar sites?

Canadian Journal of Botany. 63: 367–376.

Page 63: Potential Vegetation Hierarchy · boundaries were established by using aquatic rather than terrestrial ecological units (Maxwell et al. 1995, Seaber et al. 1987). Province M332, “middle

59

Potential Vegetation Hierarchy for the Blue Mountains Section of Northeastern Oregon…

McDonald, G.I. 1991. Connecting forest productivity to behavior of soil-borne

diseases. In: Harvey, A.E.; Neuenschwander, L.F., comps. Proceedings—

management and productivity of western-montane forest soils. Gen. Tech.

Rep. INT-280. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service,

Intermountain Research Station: 129–144.

McNab, W.H.; Avers, P.E. 1994. Ecological subregions of the United States:

section descriptions. WO-WSA-5. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of

Agriculture, Forest Service, Ecosystem Management. [Irregular pagination].

Meurisse, R.T.; Robbie, W.A.; Niehoff, J.; Ford, G. 1991. Dominant soil forma-

tion processes and properties in western-montane forest types and landscapes—

some implications for productivity and management. In: Harvey, A.E.;

Neuenschwander, L.F., comps. Proceedings—management and productivity of

western-montane forest soils. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-280. Ogden, UT: U.S. De-

partment of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station: 7–19.

Morgan, P.; Bunting, S.C.; Black, A.E.; Merrill, T.; Barrett, S. 1996. Fire

regimes in the interior Columbia River basin: past and present. Final report for

contract RJVA-INT-94913: coarse-scale classification and mapping of disturb-

ance regimes in the Columbia River basin. Portland, OR: U.S. Department

of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Interior

Columbia Basin Ecosystem Management Project. 37 p. http://www.icbemp.gov/

science/morgan.pdf. (January 2006).

Noble, I.R.; Slatyer, R.O. 1980. The use of vital attributes to predict successional

changes in plant communities subject to recurrent disturbances. Vegetatio. 43:

5–21.

O’Hara, K.L.; Latham, P.A.; Hessburg, P.; Smith, B.G. 1996. A structural

classification for inland Northwest forest vegetation. Western Journal of Applied

Forestry. 11(3): 97–102.

Oliver, C.D.; Larson, B.C. 1996. Forest stand dynamics. Update ed. New York:

John Wiley & Sons. 520 p.

Patterson, P.A.; Neiman, K.E.; Tonn, J.R. 1985. Field guide to forest plants of

northern Idaho. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-180. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of

Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station. 246 p.

Page 64: Potential Vegetation Hierarchy · boundaries were established by using aquatic rather than terrestrial ecological units (Maxwell et al. 1995, Seaber et al. 1987). Province M332, “middle

60

GENERAL TECHNICAL REPORT PNW-GTR-709

Peterson, D.L.; Johnson, M.C.; Agee, J.K.; Jain, T.B.; McKenzie, D.;

Reinhardt, E.D. 2005. Forest structure and fire hazard in dry forests of the

Western United States. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-628. Portland, OR: U.S.

Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station.

30 p.

Pfister, R.D.; Arno, S.F. 1980. Classifying forest habitat types based on potential

climax vegetation. Forest Science. 26(1): 52–70.

Powell, D.C., comp. 1998. Potential natural vegetation of the Umatilla National

Forest. 31 p. Unpublished report. On file with: USDA Forest Service, Umatilla

National Forest, 2517 SW Hailey Avenue, Pendleton, OR 97801.

Powell, D.C. 1999. Suggested stocking levels for forest stands in northeastern

Oregon and southeastern Washington: an implementation guide for the Umatilla

National Forest. Tech. Publ. F14-SO-TP-03-99. Pendleton, OR: U.S. Depart-

ment of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Region, Umatilla

National Forest. 300 p.

Powell, D.C. 2000. Potential vegetation, disturbance, plant succession, and other

aspects of forest ecology. Tech. Publ. F14-SO-TP-09-00. Pendleton, OR: U.S.

Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Region, Umatilla

National Forest. 88 p.

Powell, D.C. 2005. Tree density thresholds related to crown fire susceptibility.

20 p. Unpublished report. On file with: USDA Forest Service, Umatilla

National Forest, 2517 SW Hailey Avenue, Pendleton, OR 97801.

Quigley, T.M.; Arbelbide, S.J., tech. eds. 1997. An assessment of ecosystem

components in the interior Columbia basin and portions of the Klamath and

Great Basins. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-405. Portland, OR: U.S. Department

of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 4 volumes.

Quigley, T.M.; Cole, H.B. 1997. Highlighted scientific findings of the Interior

Columbia Basin Ecosystem Management Project. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-

404. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific

Northwest Research Station. 34 p.

Quigley, T.M.; Haynes, R.W.; Graham, R.T. 1996. Integrated scientific

assessment for ecosystem management in the interior Columbia basin. Gen.

Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-382. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture,

Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 303 p.

Page 65: Potential Vegetation Hierarchy · boundaries were established by using aquatic rather than terrestrial ecological units (Maxwell et al. 1995, Seaber et al. 1987). Province M332, “middle

61

Potential Vegetation Hierarchy for the Blue Mountains Section of Northeastern Oregon…

Reid, M.; Bourgeron, P.; Humphries, H.; Jensen, M., comps. and eds. 1995.

Documentation of the modeling of potential vegetation at three spatial scales

using biophysical settings in the Columbia River basin assessment area. 354 p.

Unpublished final report for contract #53-04HI-6890. http://www.icbemp.gov/

science/reid_1.pdf and http://www.icbemp.gov/science/reid_2.pdf.

(January 2006).

Regional Ecosystem Office [REO]. 1995. Ecosystem analysis at the watershed

scale: federal guide for watershed analysis. Version 2.2. Portland, OR: Regional

Ecosystem Office. 26 p.

Roberts, D.W. 1996. Modelling forest dynamics with vital attributes and fuzzy

systems theory. Ecological Modelling. 90: 161–173.

Rydberg, P.A. 1916. Vegetative life zones of the Rocky Mountain region. Memoirs

of the New York Botanical Garden. 6: 477–499.

Sampson, A.W. 1939. Plant indicators–concept and status. Botanical Review.

5(3): 155–206.

Schmidt, K.M.; Menakis, J.P.; Hardy, C.C.; Hann, W.J.; Bunnell, D.L. 2002.

Development of coarse-scale spatial data for wildland fire and fuel manage-

ment. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-87. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department

of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 41 p. [and

CD-ROM].

Schmitt, C.; Powell, D.C. 2005. Rating forest stands for insect and disease

susceptibility: a simplified approach. Version 2.0. Publ. BMPMSC-05-01.

La Grande, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific

Northwest Region, Umatilla and Wallowa-Whitman National Forests. 20 p.

Seaber, P.R.; Kapinos, F.P.; Knapp, G.L. 1987. Hydrologic unit maps. Water

Supply Paper 2294. Corvallis, OR: U.S. Geological Survey. 63 p.

Shiflet, T.N., ed. 1994. Rangeland cover types of the United States. Denver, CO:

Society for Range Management. 152 p.

Smith, T.; Huston, M. 1989. A theory of the spatial and temporal dynamics of

plant communities. Vegetatio. 83: 49–69.

Starker, T.J. 1934. Fire resistance in the forest. Journal of Forestry.

32(4): 462–467.

Stauffer, R.C. 1957. Haeckel, Darwin, and ecology. Quarterly Review of Biology.

32(2): 138–144.

Page 66: Potential Vegetation Hierarchy · boundaries were established by using aquatic rather than terrestrial ecological units (Maxwell et al. 1995, Seaber et al. 1987). Province M332, “middle

62

GENERAL TECHNICAL REPORT PNW-GTR-709

Steele, R.; Pfister, R.D.; Ryker, R.A.; Kittams, J.A. 1981. Forest habitat types

of central Idaho. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-114. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of

Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment

Station. 138 p.

Steele, R.; Williams, R.E.; Weatherby, J.C.; Reinhardt, E.D.; Hoffman, J.T.;

Thier, R.W. 1996. Stand hazard rating for central Idaho forests. Gen. Tech.

Rep. INT-GTR-332. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest

Service, Intermountain Research Station. 29 p.

Swanson, F.J.; Kratz, T.K.; Caine, N.; Woodmansee, R.G. 1988. Landform

effects on ecosystem patterns and processes. BioScience. 38(2): 92–98.

Tansley, A.G. 1935. The use and abuse of vegetational concepts and terms.

Ecology. 16(3): 284–307.

Thomas, J.W., tech. ed. 1979. Wildlife habitats in managed forests: the Blue

Mountains of Oregon and Washington. Agric. Handb. 553. Washington, DC:

U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 512 p.

U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 1995. Revised interim direction

establishing riparian, ecosystem and wildlife standards for timber sales;

Regional Forester’s Forest Plan Amendment #2. Portland, OR: Pacific

Northwest Region. 14 p.

U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 1996. Status of the interior

Columbia basin: summary of scientific findings. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-

385. Portland, OR: Pacific Northwest Research Station; U.S. Department of the

Interior, Bureau of Land Management. 144 p.

U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 2002. Establishment of a

potential vegetation hierarchy for forest planning. 21 p. Unpublished report. On

file with: USDA Forest Service, Umatilla National Forest, 2517 SW Hailey

Avenue, Pendleton, OR 97801.

U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service

[USDA NRCS]. 2003. Keys to soil taxonomy. 9th ed. Washington, DC: Soil

Survey Staff. 332 p.

U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service

[USDA NRCS]. 2004. The PLANTS database, version 3.5 [Database]. Baton

Rouge, LA: National Plant Data Center. http://plants.usda.gov. (December

2006).

Page 67: Potential Vegetation Hierarchy · boundaries were established by using aquatic rather than terrestrial ecological units (Maxwell et al. 1995, Seaber et al. 1987). Province M332, “middle

63

Potential Vegetation Hierarchy for the Blue Mountains Section of Northeastern Oregon…

Weaver, T.; Gustafson, D.; Lichthardt, J. 2001. Exotic plants in early and late

seral vegetation of fifteen northern Rocky Mountain environments (HTs).

Western North American Naturalist. 61(4): 417–427.

Wells, A.F. 2006. Deep canyon and subalpine riparian and wetland plant

associations of the Malheur, Umatilla, and Wallowa-Whitman National Forests.

Gen. Tech. Rep. GTR-PNW-682. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of

Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 277 p.

Westveld, M. 1951. Vegetation mapping as a guide to better silviculture. Ecology.

32(3): 508–517.

Winthers, E.; Fallon, D.; Haglund, J.; DeMeo, T; Nowacki, G.; Tart, D.;

Ferwerda, M.; Robertson, G.; Gallegos, A.; Rorick, A.; Cleland, D.T.;

Robbie, W. 2005. Terrestrial ecological unit inventory technical guide:

landscape and land unit scales. Gen. Tech. Rep. WO-68. Washington, DC: U.S.

Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Washington Office, Ecosystem

Management Coordination Staff. 254 p.

Worster, D. 1996. Nature’s economy: a history of ecological ideas. 2nd ed.

Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press. 507 p.

Zerbe, S. 1998. Potential natural vegetation: validity and applicability in landscape

planning and nature conservation. Applied Vegetation Science. 1: 165–172.

Page 68: Potential Vegetation Hierarchy · boundaries were established by using aquatic rather than terrestrial ecological units (Maxwell et al. 1995, Seaber et al. 1987). Province M332, “middle

64

GENERAL TECHNICAL REPORT PNW-GTR-709

App

endi

x: P

oten

tial V

eget

atio

n Ty

pes

of th

e B

lue

Mou

ntai

ns S

ectio

nTa

ble

8–P

oten

tial

veg

etat

ion

type

s (P

VT

) of

the

Blu

e M

ount

ains

sec

tion

, or

gani

zed

by p

oten

tial

veg

etat

ion

type

cod

ea

PV

T c

ode

(PL

AN

TS

code

)P

VT

com

mon

nam

eS

tatu

sE

cocl

ass

PA

GP

VG

AB

GR

/AC

GL

gran

d fi

r/R

ocky

Mou

ntai

n m

aple

PAC

WS

912

War

m v

ery

moi

st U

FM

oist

UF

AB

GR

/AC

GL

gran

d fi

r/R

ocky

Mou

ntai

n m

aple

PAC

WS

541

War

m v

ery

moi

st U

FM

oist

UF

AB

GR

/AC

GL

(F

LO

OD

PL

AIN

)gr

and

fir/

Roc

ky M

ount

ain

map

le (

floo

dpla

in)

PAC

WS

543

War

m m

oder

ate

SM

RF

War

m R

FA

BG

R/A

CG

L-P

HM

A5

gran

d fi

r/R

ocky

Mou

ntai

n m

aple

-mal

low

nin

ebar

kP

CT

CW

S41

2W

arm

moi

st U

FM

oist

UF

AB

GR

/AR

CO

9gr

and

fir/

hear

tlea

f ar

nica

PC

TC

WF

444

Col

d dr

y U

FC

old

UF

AB

GR

/AT

FI

gran

d fi

r/la

dyfe

rnPA

CW

F61

3W

arm

hig

h S

M R

FW

arm

RF

AB

GR

/BR

VU

gran

d fi

r/C

olum

bia

brom

ePA

CW

G21

1W

arm

moi

st U

FM

oist

UF

AB

GR

/CA

GE

2gr

and

fir/

elk

sedg

ePA

CW

G11

1W

arm

dry

UF

Dry

UF

AB

GR

/CA

LA

30gr

and

fir/

woo

lly

sedg

ePC

CW

M31

1W

arm

hig

h S

M R

FW

arm

RF

AB

GR

/CA

RU

gran

d fi

r/pi

negr

ass

PAC

WG

112

War

m d

ry U

FD

ry U

FA

BG

R/C

AR

Ugr

and

fir/

pine

gras

sPA

CW

G11

3W

arm

dry

UF

Dry

UF

AB

GR

/CL

UN

2gr

and

fir/

quee

ncup

bea

dlil

yPA

CW

F42

1C

ool

moi

st U

FM

oist

UF

AB

GR

/CO

OC

gran

d fi

r/go

ldth

read

PAC

WF

511

Coo

l dr

y U

FC

old

UF

AB

GR

/CR

DO

2/C

AD

E9

gran

d fi

r/bl

ack

haw

thor

n/D

ewey

’s s

edge

PAC

WS

423

War

m h

igh

SM

RF

War

m R

FA

BG

R/G

YD

Rgr

and

fir/

oakf

ern

PAC

WF

611

Coo

l ve

ry m

oist

UF

Moi

st U

FA

BG

R/L

IBO

3gr

and

fir/

twin

flow

erPA

CW

F31

1C

ool

moi

st U

FM

oist

UF

AB

GR

/LIB

O3

gran

d fi

r/tw

infl

ower

PAC

WF

312

Coo

l m

oist

UF

Moi

st U

FA

BG

R/P

OM

U-A

SC

A2

gran

d fi

r/sw

ordf

ern-

ging

erPA

CW

F61

2C

ool

very

moi

st U

FM

oist

UF

AB

GR

/SP

BE

2gr

and

fir/

birc

hlea

f sp

irae

aPA

CW

S32

1W

arm

dry

UF

Dry

UF

AB

GR

/SP

BE

2gr

and

fir/

birc

hlea

f sp

irae

aPA

CW

S32

2W

arm

dry

UF

Dry

UF

AB

GR

/SY

AL

(F

LO

OD

PL

AIN

)gr

and

fir/

com

mon

sno

wbe

rry

(flo

odpl

ain)

PC

TC

WS

314

War

m l

ow S

M R

FL

ow S

M R

FA

BG

R/T

AB

R2/

CL

UN

2gr

and

fir/

Paci

fic

yew

/que

encu

p be

adli

lyPA

CW

F42

2C

ool

wet

UF

Moi

st U

FA

BG

R/T

AB

R2/

CL

UN

2gr

and

fir/

Paci

fic

yew

/que

encu

p be

adli

lyPA

CW

C81

1C

ool

wet

UF

Moi

st U

FA

BG

R/T

AB

R2/

LIB

O3

gran

d fi

r/Pa

cifi

c ye

w/t

win

flow

erPA

CW

C81

2C

ool

wet

UF

Moi

st U

FA

BG

R/T

AB

R2/

LIB

O3

(FL

OO

DP

LA

IN)

gran

d fi

r/Pa

cifi

c ye

w/t

win

flow

er (

floo

dpla

in)

PAC

WF

424

War

m h

igh

SM

RF

War

m R

FA

BG

R/T

RC

Agr

and

fir/

fals

e bu

gban

ePA

CW

F51

2C

ool

very

moi

st U

FM

oist

UF

AB

GR

/VA

ME

gran

d fi

r/bi

g hu

ckle

berr

yPA

CW

S21

1C

ool

moi

st U

FM

oist

UF

AB

GR

/VA

ME

gran

d fi

r/bi

g hu

ckle

berr

yPA

CW

S21

2C

ool

moi

st U

FM

oist

UF

AB

GR

/VA

SCgr

and

fir/

grou

se h

uckl

eber

ryPA

CW

S81

1C

old

dry

UF

Col

d U

FA

BG

R/V

AS

C-L

IBO

3gr

and

fir/

grou

se h

uckl

eber

ry-t

win

flow

erPA

CW

S81

2C

ool

moi

st U

FM

oist

UF

AB

GR

-CH

NO

/VA

ME

gran

d fi

r-A

lask

a ye

llow

ced

ar/b

ig h

uckl

eber

ryP

CT

CW

S23

2C

ool

moi

st U

FM

oist

UF

AB

LA

/AR

CO

9su

balp

ine

fir/

hear

tlea

f ar

nica

PAC

EF

435

Coo

l m

oist

UF

Moi

st U

FA

BL

A/A

RC

O9

suba

lpin

e fi

r/he

artl

eaf

arni

caP

CT

CE

F41

2C

ool

moi

st U

FM

oist

UF

AB

LA

/AR

NE

/AR

AC

2su

balp

ine

fir/

pine

mat

man

zani

ta/p

rick

ly s

andw

ort

PCC

ES

429

Coo

l dr

y U

FC

old

UF

AB

LA

/AT

FI

suba

lpin

e fi

r/la

dyfe

rnPA

CE

F33

2C

old

high

SM

RF

Col

d R

FA

BL

A/C

AA

Qsu

balp

ine

fir/

aqua

tic

sedg

eP

CT

CE

M12

3C

old

high

SM

RF

Col

d R

FA

BL

A/C

AC

A4

suba

lpin

e fi

r/bl

uejo

int

reed

gras

sPA

CE

M12

4C

old

mod

erat

e S

M R

FC

old

RF

AB

LA

/CA

DI6

suba

lpin

e fi

r/so

ftle

af s

edge

PC

TC

EM

122

Col

d hi

gh S

M R

FC

old

RF

AB

LA

/CA

GE

2su

balp

ine

fir/

elk

sedg

ePA

CA

G11

1C

old

dry

UF

Col

d U

FA

BL

A/C

AR

Usu

balp

ine

fir/

pine

gras

sPA

CE

G31

2C

ool

dry

UF

Col

d U

FA

BL

A/C

LU

N2

suba

lpin

e fi

r/qu

eenc

up b

eadl

ily

PAC

ES

131

Coo

l m

oist

UF

Moi

st U

F

Page 69: Potential Vegetation Hierarchy · boundaries were established by using aquatic rather than terrestrial ecological units (Maxwell et al. 1995, Seaber et al. 1987). Province M332, “middle

65

Potential Vegetation Hierarchy for the Blue Mountains Section of Northeastern Oregon…

Tabl

e 8–

Pot

enti

al v

eget

atio

n ty

pes

(PV

T)

of t

he B

lue

Mou

ntai

ns s

ecti

on,

orga

nize

d by

pot

enti

al v

eget

atio

n ty

pe c

odea

(con

tinu

ed)

PV

T c

ode

(PL

AN

TS

code

)P

VT

com

mon

nam

eS

tatu

sE

cocl

ass

PA

GP

VG

AB

LA

/CL

UN

2su

balp

ine

fir/

quee

ncup

bea

dlil

yPA

CE

S31

4C

ool

moi

st U

FM

oist

UF

AB

LA

/FE

VI

suba

lpin

e fi

r/gr

een

fesc

uePC

CE

G41

1C

old

dry

UF

Col

d U

FA

BL

A/J

UD

Rsu

balp

ine

fir/

Dru

mm

ond’

s ru

shPC

CE

G41

2C

old

dry

UF

Col

d U

FA

BL

A/J

UPA

(A

VA

LA

NC

HE

)su

balp

ine

fir/

Parr

y’s

rush

(av

alan

che)

PCC

EG

414

Col

d dr

y U

FC

old

UF

AB

LA

/JU

TE

suba

lpin

e fi

r/sl

ende

r ru

shPC

CE

G41

3C

old

dry

UF

Col

d U

FA

BL

A/L

IBO

3su

balp

ine

fir/

twin

flow

erPA

CE

F22

1C

ool

moi

st U

FM

oist

UF

AB

LA

/LIB

O3

suba

lpin

e fi

r/tw

infl

ower

PAC

ES

414

Coo

l m

oist

UF

Moi

st U

FA

BL

A/M

EF

Esu

balp

ine

fir/

rust

y m

enzi

esia

PAC

ES

221

Col

d m

oist

UF

Col

d U

FA

BL

A/P

OP

Hsu

balp

ine

fir/

alpi

ne f

leec

eflo

wer

PCC

EF

511

Col

d dr

y U

FC

old

UF

AB

LA

/PO

PU

3su

balp

ine

fir/

Jaco

b’s

ladd

erPA

CE

F41

1C

old

dry

UF

Col

d U

FA

BL

A/R

HA

L2

suba

lpin

e fi

r/w

hite

rho

dode

ndro

nP

CT

CE

S21

4C

old

moi

st U

FC

old

UF

AB

LA

/SE

TR

suba

lpin

e fi

r/ar

row

leaf

gro

unds

elPA

CE

F33

3C

old

high

SM

RF

Col

d R

FA

BL

A/S

TAM

2su

balp

ine

fir/

clas

plea

f tw

iste

dsta

lkP

CT

CE

F31

1C

ool

wet

UF

Moi

st U

FA

BL

A/S

TO

C2

suba

lpin

e fi

r/w

este

rn n

eedl

egra

ssP

CT

CE

G32

3C

old

dry

UF

Col

d U

FA

BL

A/T

RC

Asu

balp

ine

fir/

fals

e bu

gban

ePA

CE

F33

1C

ool

moi

st U

FM

oist

UF

AB

LA

/VA

ME

suba

lpin

e fi

r/bi

g hu

ckle

berr

yPA

CE

S31

5C

ool

moi

st U

FM

oist

UF

AB

LA

/VA

ME

suba

lpin

e fi

r/bi

g hu

ckle

berr

yPA

CE

S31

1C

ool

moi

st U

FM

oist

UF

AB

LA

/VA

ME

(F

LO

OD

PL

AIN

)su

balp

ine

fir/

big

huck

lebe

rry

(flo

odpl

ain)

PAC

ES

316

Col

d m

oder

ate

SM

RF

Col

d R

FA

BL

A/V

AS

Csu

balp

ine

fir/

grou

se h

uckl

eber

ryPA

CE

S41

1C

old

dry

UF

Col

d U

FA

BL

A/V

AS

C/P

OP

U3

suba

lpin

e fi

r/gr

ouse

huc

kleb

erry

/Jac

ob’s

lad

der

PAC

ES

415

Col

d dr

y U

FC

old

UF

AB

LA

/VA

SC

-PH

EM

suba

lpin

e fi

r/gr

ouse

huc

kleb

erry

-pin

k m

ount

ainh

eath

PAC

ES

428

Col

d dr

y U

FC

old

UF

AB

LA

/VA

UL

/CA

SC

12su

balp

ine

fir/

bog

blue

berr

y/H

olm

’s R

ocky

Mou

ntai

n se

dge

PC

TC

EM

313

Col

d hi

gh S

M R

FC

old

RF

AB

LA

/XE

TE

suba

lpin

e fi

r/be

argr

ass

PAC

EF

111

Coo

l dr

y U

FC

old

UF

AB

LA

-PIA

L/A

RA

C2

suba

lpin

e fi

r-w

hite

bark

pin

e/pr

ickl

y sa

ndw

ort

PCC

AF

324

Col

d dr

y U

FC

old

UF

AB

LA

-PIA

L/C

AG

E2

suba

lpin

e fi

r-w

hite

bark

pin

e/el

k se

dge

PAC

AG

133

Col

d dr

y U

FC

old

UF

AB

LA

-PIA

L/F

EV

Isu

balp

ine

fir-

whi

teba

rk p

ine/

gree

n fe

scue

PAC

AG

222

Col

d dr

y U

FC

old

UF

AB

LA

-PIA

L/J

UC

O6

suba

lpin

e fi

r-w

hite

bark

pin

e/m

ount

ain

juni

per

PCC

AS

424

Col

d dr

y U

FC

old

UF

AB

LA

-PIA

L/J

UC

O6-

AR

NE

suba

lpin

e fi

r-w

hite

bark

pin

e/m

ount

ain

juni

per-

pine

mat

man

zani

taPC

CA

S42

3C

old

dry

UF

Col

d U

FA

BL

A-P

IAL

/JU

DR

suba

lpin

e fi

r-w

hite

bark

pin

e/D

rum

mon

d’s

rush

PC

TC

AG

3C

old

dry

UF

Col

d U

FA

BL

A-P

IAL

/JU

PA-S

TL

E2

suba

lpin

e fi

r-w

hite

bark

pin

e/P

arry

’s r

ush-

Lem

mon

’s n

eedl

egra

ssPA

CA

G13

2C

old

dry

UF

Col

d U

FA

BL

A-P

IAL

/PO

PH

suba

lpin

e fi

r-w

hite

bark

pin

e/al

pine

fle

ecef

low

erP

CT

CA

F2

Col

d dr

y U

FC

old

UF

AB

LA

-PIA

L/P

OP

U3

suba

lpin

e fi

r-w

hite

bark

pin

e/Ja

cob’

s la

dder

PCC

AF

0C

old

dry

UF

Col

d U

FA

BL

A-P

IAL

/RIM

O2/

PO

PU

3su

balp

ine

fir-

whi

teba

rk p

ine/

mou

ntai

n go

oseb

erry

/Jac

ob’s

lad

der

PC

TC

AS

611

Col

d dr

y U

FC

old

UF

AB

LA

-PIA

L/V

AS

C/A

RA

C2

suba

lpin

e fi

r-w

hite

bark

pin

e/gr

ouse

huc

kleb

erry

/pri

ckly

san

dwor

tP

CT

CA

S62

3C

old

dry

UF

Col

d U

FA

BL

A-P

IAL

/VA

SC

/AR

CO

9su

balp

ine

fir-

whi

teba

rk p

ine/

grou

se h

uckl

eber

ry/h

eart

leaf

arn

ica

PAC

AS

621

Col

d dr

y U

FC

old

UF

AB

LA

-PIA

L/V

AS

C/C

AR

O5

suba

lpin

e fi

r-w

hite

bark

pin

e/gr

ouse

huc

kleb

erry

/Ros

s’ s

edge

PAC

AS

622

Col

d dr

y U

FC

old

UF

AB

LA

-PIA

L/V

AS

C/F

EV

Isu

balp

ine

fir-

whi

teba

rk p

ine/

grou

se h

uckl

eber

ry/g

reen

fes

cue

PCC

AS

625

Col

d dr

y U

FC

old

UF

AB

LA

-PIA

L/V

AS

C/F

EV

I (A

VA

LA

NC

HE

)su

balp

ine

fir-

whi

teba

rk p

ine/

grou

se h

uckl

eber

ry/g

reen

fes

cue

(ava

lanc

he)

PCC

AS

629

Col

d dr

y U

FC

old

UF

AB

LA

-PIA

L/V

AS

C/L

EC

OW

2su

balp

ine

fir-

whi

teba

rk p

ine/

grou

se h

uckl

eber

ry/W

allo

wa

Lew

isia

PCC

AS

627

Col

d dr

y U

FC

old

UF

AB

LA

-PIA

L/V

AS

C/O

RE

Xsu

balp

ine

fir-

whi

teba

rk p

ine/

grou

se h

uckl

eber

ry/l

ittl

e ri

cegr

ass

PCC

AS

626

Col

d dr

y U

FC

old

UF

AB

LA

-PIA

L/V

AS

C-P

HE

Msu

balp

ine

fir-

whi

teba

rk p

ine/

grou

se h

uckl

eber

ry-p

ink

mou

ntai

nhea

thP

CT

CA

S62

4C

old

dry

UF

Col

d U

FA

BL

A-P

IAL

/VA

SC

-PH

EM

(A

VA

LA

NC

HE

)su

balp

ine

fir-

whi

teba

rk p

ine/

grou

se h

uckl

eber

ry-p

ink

mou

ntai

nhea

th (

aval

anch

e)PC

CA

S62

8C

old

dry

UF

Col

d U

FA

BL

A-P

IEN

/AR

CO

9su

balp

ine

fir-

Eng

elm

ann

spru

ce/h

eart

leaf

arn

ica

PAC

EF

436

Coo

l m

oist

UF

Moi

st U

FA

BL

A-P

IEN

/CL

UN

2su

balp

ine

fir-

Eng

elm

ann

spru

ce/q

ueen

cup

bead

lily

PAC

EF

437

Coo

l m

oist

UF

Moi

st U

FA

BL

A-P

IEN

/LE

GL

suba

lpin

e fi

r-E

ngel

man

n sp

ruce

/Lab

rado

r te

aPA

CE

S61

2C

old

moi

st U

FC

old

UF

Page 70: Potential Vegetation Hierarchy · boundaries were established by using aquatic rather than terrestrial ecological units (Maxwell et al. 1995, Seaber et al. 1987). Province M332, “middle

66

GENERAL TECHNICAL REPORT PNW-GTR-709

Tabl

e 8–

Pot

enti

al v

eget

atio

n ty

pes

(PV

T)

of t

he B

lue

Mou

ntai

ns s

ecti

on,

orga

nize

d by

pot

enti

al v

eget

atio

n ty

pe c

odea (

cont

inue

d)

PV

T c

ode

(PL

AN

TS

code

)P

VT

com

mon

nam

eS

tatu

sE

cocl

ass

PA

GP

VG

AB

LA

-PIE

N/L

EG

L (

FL

OO

DP

LA

IN)

suba

lpin

e fi

r-E

ngel

man

n sp

ruce

/Lab

rado

r te

a (f

lood

plai

n)PA

CE

S61

0C

old

high

SM

RF

Col

d R

FA

BL

A-P

IEN

/LIB

O3

suba

lpin

e fi

r-E

ngel

man

n sp

ruce

/tw

infl

ower

PCC

EF

2C

ool

moi

st U

FM

oist

UF

AB

LA

-PIE

N/L

UH

I4su

balp

ine

fir-

Eng

elm

ann

spru

ce/s

moo

th w

oodr

ush

PCC

EG

131

Col

d dr

y U

FC

old

UF

AB

LA

-PIE

N/M

EF

Esu

balp

ine

fir-

Eng

elm

ann

spru

ce/r

usty

men

zies

iaPA

CE

S2

Col

d m

oist

UF

Col

d U

FA

BL

A-P

IEN

/ME

FE

(F

LO

OD

PL

AIN

)su

balp

ine

fir-

Eng

elm

ann

spru

ce/r

usty

men

zies

ia (

floo

dpla

in)

PAC

ES

710

Col

d m

oder

ate

SM

RF

Col

d R

FA

BL

A-P

IEN

/PO

PU

3su

balp

ine

fir-

Eng

elm

ann

spru

ce/J

acob

’s l

adde

rPC

CE

F42

6C

old

dry

UF

Col

d U

FA

BL

A-P

IEN

/RH

AL

2su

balp

ine

fir-

Eng

elm

ann

spru

ce/w

hite

rho

dode

ndro

nPC

CE

S21

5C

old

moi

st U

FC

old

UF

AB

LA

-PIE

N/S

ET

Rsu

balp

ine

fir-

Eng

elm

ann

spru

ce/a

rrow

leaf

gro

unds

elPC

CE

F33

6C

old

moi

st U

FC

old

UF

AB

LA

-PIE

N/T

RC

Asu

balp

ine

fir-

Eng

elm

ann

spru

ce/f

alse

bug

bane

PCC

EF

425

Coo

l m

oist

UF

Moi

st U

FA

BL

A-P

IEN

/VA

SC

-PH

EM

suba

lpin

e fi

r-E

ngel

man

n sp

ruce

/gro

use

huck

lebe

rry-

pink

mou

ntai

nhea

thPC

CE

S42

7C

old

dry

UF

Col

d U

FA

BL

A-P

IMO

3/C

HU

Msu

balp

ine

fir-

wes

tern

whi

te p

ine/

prin

ce’s

pin

ePC

CE

S8

Coo

l dr

y U

FC

old

UF

AC

GL

Roc

ky M

ount

ain

map

leP

CT

HD

01H

ot l

ow S

M R

SL

ow S

M R

SA

DP

Em

aide

nhai

r fe

rnP

CT

FW

4213

War

m h

igh

SM

RH

War

m R

HA

GD

Ith

in b

entg

rass

PC

TM

D4

11

1W

arm

low

SM

RH

Low

SM

RH

AG

SP

-BR

CA

5bl

uebu

nch

whe

atgr

ass-

mou

ntai

n br

ome

PC

TG

B41

31W

arm

moi

st U

HM

oist

UH

AG

SP

-CY

TE

Fbl

uebu

nch

whe

atgr

ass-

turp

enti

ne c

ymop

teru

sP

CT

GB

4133

Hot

dry

UH

Dry

UH

AG

SP

-ER

HE

2bl

uebu

nch

whe

atgr

ass-

Wye

th’s

buc

kwhe

atPA

GB

4111

Hot

dry

UH

Dry

UH

AG

SP

-ER

UM

blue

bunc

h w

heat

gras

s-su

lphu

rflo

wer

buc

kwhe

atP

CT

GB

4132

Hot

dry

UH

Dry

UH

AG

SP

-PO

SA

12bl

uebu

nch

whe

atgr

ass-

San

dber

g’s

blue

gras

sPA

GB

41H

ot d

ry U

HD

ry U

HA

GS

P-P

OS

A12

blue

bunc

h w

heat

gras

s-S

andb

erg’

s bl

uegr

ass

PAG

B41

21H

ot d

ry U

HD

ry U

HA

GS

P-P

OS

A12

(B

AS

ALT

)bl

uebu

nch

whe

atgr

ass-

San

dber

g’s

blue

gras

s (b

asal

t)PA

GB

4113

Hot

dry

UH

Dry

UH

AG

SP

-PO

SA

12 (

GR

AN

ITE

)bl

uebu

nch

whe

atgr

ass-

San

dber

g’s

blue

gras

s (g

rani

te)

PAG

B41

16H

ot d

ry U

HD

ry U

HA

GS

P-P

OS

A12

-APA

N2

blue

bunc

h w

heat

gras

s-S

andb

erg’

s bl

uegr

ass-

spre

adin

g do

gban

ePA

GB

4127

Hot

dry

UH

Dry

UH

AG

SP

-PO

SA

12-A

SC

U5

blue

bunc

h w

heat

gras

s-S

andb

erg’

s bl

uegr

ass-

Cus

ick’

s m

ilkv

etch

PAG

B41

14H

ot d

ry U

HD

ry U

HA

GS

P-P

OS

A12

-AS

RE

5bl

uebu

nch

whe

atgr

ass-

San

dber

g’s

blue

gras

s-B

lue

Mou

ntai

n m

ilkv

etch

PAG

B41

25H

ot d

ry U

HD

ry U

HA

GS

P-P

OS

A12

-BA

SA

3bl

uebu

nch

whe

atgr

ass-

San

dber

g’s

blue

gras

s-ar

row

leaf

bal

sam

root

PAG

B41

23H

ot d

ry U

HD

ry U

HA

GS

P-P

OS

A12

-DA

UN

blue

bunc

h w

heat

gras

s-S

andb

erg’

s bl

uegr

ass-

ones

pike

oat

gras

sPA

GB

4911

Hot

dry

UH

Dry

UH

AG

SP

-PO

SA

12-E

RH

E2

blue

bunc

h w

heat

gras

s-S

andb

erg’

s bl

uegr

ass-

crea

my

buck

whe

atPA

GB

4124

Hot

dry

UH

Dry

UH

AG

SP

-PO

SA

12-E

RP

U2

blue

bunc

h w

heat

gras

s-S

andb

erg’

s bl

uegr

ass-

shag

gy f

leab

ane

PAG

B41

15H

ot d

ry U

HD

ry U

HA

GS

P-P

OS

A12

-LU

PIN

blue

bunc

h w

heat

gras

s-S

andb

erg’

s bl

uegr

ass-

lupi

nePA

GB

4119

Hot

dry

UH

Dry

UH

AG

SP

-PO

SA

12-O

PP

Obl

uebu

nch

whe

atgr

ass-

San

dber

g’s

blue

gras

s-pr

ickl

ypea

rPA

GB

4118

Hot

dry

UH

Dry

UH

AG

SP

-PO

SA

12-P

HC

O10

blue

bunc

h w

heat

gras

s-S

andb

erg’

s bl

uegr

ass-

Sna

ke R

iver

phl

oxPA

GB

4117

Hot

dry

UH

Dry

UH

AG

SP

-PO

SA

12-S

CA

N3

blue

bunc

h w

heat

gras

s-S

andb

erg’

s bl

uegr

ass-

narr

owle

af s

kull

cap

PAG

B41

12H

ot d

ry U

HD

ry U

HA

GS

P-P

OS

A12

-TR

MA

3bl

uebu

nch

whe

atgr

ass-

San

dber

g’s

blue

gras

s-bi

ghea

d cl

over

PAG

B41

26H

ot d

ry U

HD

ry U

HA

GS

P-S

PC

R-A

RL

O3

blue

bunc

h w

heat

gras

s-sa

nd d

rops

eed-

red

thre

eaw

nP

CT

GB

1911

Hot

dry

UH

Dry

UH

AL

IN2/

AT

FI

mou

ntai

n al

der/

lady

fern

PAS

W21

16W

arm

hig

h S

M R

SW

arm

RS

AL

IN2/

CA

AM

10m

ount

ain

alde

r/bi

glea

f se

dge

PAS

W21

14W

arm

hig

h S

M R

SW

arm

RS

AL

IN2/

CA

AQ

mou

ntai

n al

der/

aqua

tic

sedg

ePC

SW

2126

War

m h

igh

SM

RS

War

m R

SA

LIN

2/C

AC

A4

mou

ntai

n al

der/

blue

join

t re

edgr

ass

PAS

W21

21W

arm

mod

erat

e S

M R

SW

arm

RS

AL

IN2/

CA

DE

9m

ount

ain

alde

r/D

ewey

’s s

edge

PC

TS

W21

18W

arm

mod

erat

e S

M R

SW

arm

RS

AL

IN2/

CA

LA

30m

ount

ain

alde

r/w

ooll

y se

dge

PAS

W21

23W

arm

mod

erat

e S

M R

SW

arm

RS

AL

IN2/

CA

LE

Lm

ount

ain

alde

r/de

nsel

y tu

fted

sed

gePC

SW

2127

War

m m

oder

ate

SM

RS

War

m R

SA

LIN

2/C

AL

U7

mou

ntai

n al

der/

woo

drus

h se

dge

PCS

W21

28W

arm

low

SM

RS

Low

SM

RS

AL

IN2/

CA

UT

mou

ntai

n al

der/

blad

der

sedg

ePA

SW

2115

War

m h

igh

SM

RS

War

m R

SA

LIN

2/E

QA

Rm

ount

ain

alde

r/co

mm

on h

orse

tail

PAS

W21

17W

arm

mod

erat

e S

M R

SW

arm

RS

Page 71: Potential Vegetation Hierarchy · boundaries were established by using aquatic rather than terrestrial ecological units (Maxwell et al. 1995, Seaber et al. 1987). Province M332, “middle

67

Potential Vegetation Hierarchy for the Blue Mountains Section of Northeastern Oregon…

Tabl

e 8–

Pot

enti

al v

eget

atio

n ty

pes

(PV

T)

of t

he B

lue

Mou

ntai

ns s

ecti

on,

orga

nize

d by

pot

enti

al v

eget

atio

n ty

pe c

odea (

cont

inue

d)

PV

T c

ode

(PL

AN

TS

code

)P

VT

com

mon

nam

eS

tatu

sE

cocl

ass

PAG

PV

G

AL

IN2/

GL

EL

mou

ntai

n al

der/

tall

man

nagr

ass

PAS

W22

15W

arm

hig

h S

M R

SW

arm

RS

AL

IN2/

GY

DR

mou

ntai

n al

der/

oakf

ern

PC

TS

W21

25W

arm

mod

erat

e S

M R

SW

arm

RS

AL

IN2/

HE

LA

4m

ount

ain

alde

r/co

mm

on c

owpa

rsni

pP

CT

SW

2124

War

m m

oder

ate

SM

RS

War

m R

SA

LIN

2/P

OP

Rm

ount

ain

alde

r/K

entu

cky

blue

gras

sP

CT

SW

2120

War

m l

ow S

M R

SL

ow S

M R

SA

LIN

2/S

CM

I2m

ount

ain

alde

r/sm

allf

ruit

bul

rush

PC

TS

W21

22W

arm

hig

h S

M R

SW

arm

RS

AL

IN2-

CO

ST

4/M

ES

IC F

OR

Bm

ount

ain

alde

r-re

d os

ier

dogw

ood/

mes

ic f

orb

PAS

W22

16W

arm

mod

erat

e S

M R

SW

arm

RS

AL

IN2-

RIB

ES

/ME

SIC

FO

RB

mou

ntai

n al

der-

curr

ants

/mes

ic f

orb

PAS

W22

17W

arm

mod

erat

e S

M R

SW

arm

RS

AL

IN2-

SY

AL

mou

ntai

n al

der-

com

mon

sno

wbe

rry

PAS

W22

11W

arm

low

SM

RS

Low

SM

RS

AL

PR

3m

eado

w f

oxta

ilP

CT

MD

21

11

War

m l

ow S

M R

HL

ow S

M R

HA

LR

H2/

ME

SIC

SH

RU

Bw

hite

ald

er/m

esic

shr

ubP

CT

SW

2102

Hot

mod

erat

e S

M R

FW

arm

RF

AL

RH

2/R

UB

US

whi

te a

lder

/bla

ckbe

rry

PC

TS

W21

01H

ot m

oder

ate

SM

RF

War

m R

FA

LR

U2

(AL

LU

VIA

L B

AR

)re

d al

der

(all

uvia

l ba

r)P

CT

HA

F22

6W

arm

mod

erat

e S

M R

FW

arm

RF

AL

RU

2/A

TF

Ire

d al

der/

lady

fern

PC

TH

AF

227

War

m h

igh

SM

RF

War

m R

FA

LR

U2/

CO

ST

4re

d al

der/

red

osie

r do

gwoo

dPC

HA

S51

1W

arm

mod

erat

e S

M R

FW

arm

RF

AL

RU

2/P

EF

RP

red

alde

r/sw

eet

colt

sfoo

tP

CT

HA

F21

1W

arm

mod

erat

e S

M R

FW

arm

RF

AL

RU

2/P

HC

A11

red

alde

r/Pa

cifi

c ni

neba

rkPA

HA

S21

1W

arm

mod

erat

e S

M R

FW

arm

RF

AL

RU

2/S

YA

Lre

d al

der/

com

mon

sno

wbe

rry

PC

T[n

one]

War

m m

oder

ate

SM

RF

War

m R

FA

LR

U2/

SY

AL

/CA

DE

9re

d al

der/

com

mon

sno

wbe

rry/

Dew

ey’s

sed

geP

CT

HA

S31

2W

arm

mod

erat

e S

M R

FW

arm

RF

AL

SI3

Sit

ka a

lder

sno

w s

lide

sP

CT

SM

20C

old

very

moi

st U

SC

old

US

AL

SI3

/AT

FI

Sit

ka a

lder

/lad

yfer

nPA

SW

2111

War

m h

igh

SM

RS

War

m R

SA

LS

I3/C

ILA

2S

itka

ald

er/d

roop

ing

woo

dree

dPA

SW

2112

War

m h

igh

SM

RS

War

m R

SA

LS

I3/M

ES

IC F

OR

BS

itka

ald

er/m

esic

for

bP

CT

SW

2113

War

m m

oder

ate

SM

RS

War

m R

SA

LVA

Pac

ific

oni

onP

CT

[non

e]C

old

high

SM

RH

Col

d R

HA

LVA

-CA

SC

12P

acif

ic o

nion

-Hol

m’s

Roc

ky M

ount

ain

sedg

ePA

FW

7111

Col

d hi

gh S

M R

HC

old

RH

AM

AL

2w

este

rn s

ervi

cebe

rry

PC

TS

W31

14H

ot l

ow S

M R

SL

ow S

M R

SA

RA

R8/

AG

SP

low

sag

ebru

sh/b

lueb

unch

whe

atgr

ass

PAS

D19

24W

arm

dry

US

Dry

US

AR

AR

8/F

EID

-AG

SP

low

sag

ebru

sh/I

daho

fes

cue-

blue

bunc

h w

heat

gras

sPA

SD

1911

War

m m

oist

US

Moi

st U

SA

RA

R8/

PO

SA

12lo

w s

ageb

rush

/San

dber

g’s

blue

gras

sPA

SD

9221

War

m d

ry U

SD

ry U

SA

RC

A13

/DE

CE

silv

er s

ageb

rush

/tuf

ted

hair

gras

sPA

SW

6111

Hot

mod

erat

e S

M R

SW

arm

RS

AR

CA

13/P

OC

U3

silv

er s

ageb

rush

/Cus

ick’

s bl

uegr

ass

PC

TS

W61

14H

ot l

ow S

M R

SL

ow S

M R

SA

RC

A13

/PO

PR

silv

er s

ageb

rush

/Ken

tuck

y bl

uegr

ass

PC

TS

W61

12H

ot l

ow S

M R

SL

ow S

M R

SA

RL

Uw

hite

sag

ebru

shP

CT

SD

01W

arm

low

SM

RH

Low

SM

RH

AR

RI2

/PE

GA

stif

f sa

gebr

ush/

Gai

rdne

r’s

pens

tem

onP

CT

SD

9141

War

m d

ry U

SD

ry U

SA

RR

I2/P

OS

A12

(S

CA

B)

stif

f sa

gebr

ush/

San

dber

g’s

blue

gras

s (s

cabl

and)

PAS

D91

11W

arm

dry

US

Dry

US

AR

TR

4/P

OS

A12

-DA

UN

thre

etip

sag

ebru

sh/S

andb

erg’

s bl

uegr

ass-

ones

pike

oat

gras

sP

CT

SD

2401

War

m d

ry U

SD

ry U

SA

RT

RV

/AG

SP

-PO

SA

12m

ount

ain

big

sage

brus

h/bl

uebu

nch

whe

atgr

ass-

San

dber

g’s

blue

gras

sPA

SD

2918

War

m d

ry U

SD

ry U

SA

RT

RV

/BR

CA

5m

ount

ain

big

sage

brus

h/m

ount

ain

brom

eP

CT

SS

4914

War

m m

oist

US

Moi

st U

SA

RT

RV

/CA

GE

2m

ount

ain

big

sage

brus

h/el

k se

dge

PAS

S49

11C

old

moi

st U

SC

old

US

AR

TR

V/C

AG

E2

(MO

NTA

NE

)m

ount

ain

big

sage

brus

h/el

k se

dge

(mon

tane

)P

CT

SD

2915

War

m m

oist

US

Moi

st U

SA

RT

RV

/CA

HO

5m

ount

ain

big

sage

brus

h/H

ood’

s se

dge

PC

TS

S49

16C

old

moi

st U

SC

old

US

AR

TR

V/E

LC

I2m

ount

ain

big

sage

brus

h/ba

sin

wil

drye

PC

TS

D30

11W

arm

moi

st U

SM

oist

US

AR

TR

V/E

RF

L4-

PH

LO

Xm

ount

ain

big

sage

brus

h/go

lden

buc

kwhe

at-p

hlox

PCS

S49

18C

ool

dry

US

Col

d U

SA

RT

RV

/FE

ID-A

GS

Pm

ount

ain

big

sage

brus

h/Id

aho

fesc

ue-b

lueb

unch

whe

atgr

ass

PAS

D29

11W

arm

moi

st U

SM

oist

US

AR

TR

V/F

EID

-KO

CR

mou

ntai

n bi

g sa

gebr

ush/

Idah

o fe

scue

-pra

irie

jun

egra

ssPA

SD

2929

War

m m

oist

US

Moi

st U

SA

RT

RV

/FE

VI

mou

ntai

n bi

g sa

gebr

ush/

gree

n fe

scue

PC

TS

S49

15C

old

moi

st U

SC

old

US

Page 72: Potential Vegetation Hierarchy · boundaries were established by using aquatic rather than terrestrial ecological units (Maxwell et al. 1995, Seaber et al. 1987). Province M332, “middle

68

GENERAL TECHNICAL REPORT PNW-GTR-709

Tabl

e 8–

Pot

enti

al v

eget

atio

n ty

pes

(PV

T)

of t

he B

lue

Mou

ntai

ns s

ecti

on,

orga

nize

d by

pot

enti

al v

eget

atio

n ty

pe c

odea (c

onti

nued

)

PV

T c

ode

(PL

AN

TS

code

)P

VT

com

mon

nam

eS

tatu

sE

cocl

ass

PA

GP

VG

AR

TR

V/L

INU

4m

ount

ain

big

sage

brus

h/li

nant

hus

PC

TS

S49

17C

ool

dry

US

Col

d U

SA

RT

RV

/PO

CU

3m

ount

ain

big

sage

brus

h/C

usic

k’s

blue

gras

sPA

SW

6113

Hot

low

SM

RS

Low

SM

RS

AR

TR

V/S

TO

C2

mou

ntai

n bi

g sa

gebr

ush/

wes

tern

nee

dleg

rass

PCS

D29

20C

ool

dry

US

Col

d U

SA

RT

RV

-PE

RA

4m

ount

ain

big

sage

brus

h-sq

uaw

app

leP

CT

SD

3010

War

m m

oist

US

Moi

st U

SA

RT

RV

-PU

TR

2/F

EID

mou

ntai

n bi

g sa

gebr

ush-

bitt

erbr

ush/

Idah

o fe

scue

PC

TS

D29

16H

ot m

oist

US

Moi

st U

SA

RT

RV

-SY

OR

2m

ount

ain

big

sage

brus

h-m

ount

ain

snow

berr

yP

CT

SD

2919

War

m m

oist

US

Moi

st U

SA

RT

RV

-SY

OR

2/B

RC

A5

mou

ntai

n bi

g sa

gebr

ush-

mou

ntai

n sn

owbe

rry/

mou

ntai

n br

ome

PC

TS

D29

17W

arm

moi

st U

SM

oist

US

BE

OC

2/M

ES

IC F

OR

Bw

ater

bir

ch/m

esic

for

bP

CT

SW

3112

War

m m

oder

ate

SM

RS

War

m R

SB

EO

C2/

PH

AR

3w

ater

bir

ch/r

eed

cana

rygr

ass

PCS

M41

War

m m

oder

ate

SM

RS

War

m R

SB

EO

C2/

WE

T S

ED

GE

wat

er b

irch

/wet

sed

geP

CT

SW

3113

War

m h

igh

SM

RS

War

m R

SB

ER

E/A

GS

P-A

PAN

2cr

eepi

ng O

rego

ngra

pe/b

lueb

unch

whe

atgr

ass-

spre

adin

g do

gban

eP

CT

GB

4915

War

m d

ry U

SD

ry U

SC

AA

M10

bigl

eaf

sedg

ePA

MM

29

21

War

m h

igh

SM

RH

War

m R

HC

AA

Qaq

uati

c se

dge

PAM

M2

91

4C

ool

high

SM

RH

Col

d R

HC

AC

A11

silv

ery

sedg

eP

CT

MS

3113

War

m m

oder

ate

SM

RH

War

m R

HC

AC

A4

blue

join

t re

edgr

ass

PAG

M4

11

1C

ool

mod

erat

e S

M R

HC

old

RH

CA

CU

2 (S

EE

P)

Cus

ick’

s ca

mas

(se

ep)

PC

TF

W39

11W

arm

ver

y m

oist

UH

Moi

st U

HC

AC

U5

Cus

ick’

s se

dge

PAM

M2

91

8W

arm

hig

h S

M R

HW

arm

RH

CA

EU

2w

idef

ruit

sed

gePA

MM

29

13

Col

d hi

gh S

M R

HC

old

RH

CA

GE

2-C

AR

Uel

k se

dge-

pine

gras

sPC

GS

3914

Col

d dr

y U

HC

old

UH

CA

GE

2-F

EID

elk

sedg

e-Id

aho

fesc

uePC

GS

3912

Col

d dr

y U

HC

old

UH

CA

GE

2-JU

PAel

k se

dge-

Par

ry’s

rus

hPC

GS

3913

Col

d dr

y U

HC

old

UH

CA

GE

2-P

HA

U3

elk

sedg

e-de

sert

phl

oxPC

GS

3916

Col

d dr

y U

HC

old

UH

CA

GE

2-P

OC

U3

elk

sedg

e-C

usic

k’s

blue

gras

sPC

GS

3915

Col

d dr

y U

HC

old

UH

CA

GE

2-S

TO

C2

elk

sedg

e-w

este

rn n

eedl

egra

ssPC

GS

3917

Col

d dr

y U

HC

old

UH

CA

HO

5H

ood’

s se

dge

PC

TG

S64

Coo

l m

oist

UH

Col

d U

HC

AH

O5-

BR

CA

5H

ood’

s se

dge-

mou

ntai

n br

ome

PCG

S61

Coo

l m

oist

UH

Col

d U

HC

AH

O5-

BR

CA

5 (M

EA

DO

W)

Hoo

d’s

sedg

e-m

ount

ain

brom

e (m

eado

w)

PCG

S40

12C

ool

moi

st U

HC

old

UH

CA

HO

5-C

AG

E2

Hoo

d’s

sedg

e-el

k se

dge

PCG

S62

Coo

l m

oist

UH

Col

d U

HC

AH

O5-

PO

GL

9H

ood’

s se

dge-

stic

ky c

inqu

efoi

lPC

GS

63C

ool

dry

UH

Col

d U

HC

AJO

Jone

s’ s

edge

PCM

M2

93

3W

arm

mod

erat

e S

M R

HW

arm

RH

CA

LA

11sl

ende

r se

dge

PAM

M2

92

0W

arm

hig

h S

M R

HW

arm

RH

CA

LA

13sm

ooth

stem

med

sed

gePC

MW

2913

Col

d hi

gh S

M R

HC

old

RH

CA

LA

30w

ooll

y se

dge

PAM

M2

91

1W

arm

mod

erat

e S

M R

HW

arm

RH

CA

LE

8la

kesh

ore

sedg

ePA

MM

29

19

War

m m

oder

ate

SM

RH

War

m R

HC

AL

E9

Sie

rra

hare

sed

gePA

MM

29

27

Col

d hi

gh S

M R

HC

old

RH

CA

LI7

mud

sed

gePA

MM

29

28

Col

d hi

gh S

M R

HC

old

RH

CA

LU

7w

oodr

ush

sedg

ePA

MM

29

16

Col

d hi

gh S

M R

HC

old

RH

CA

MI7

smal

lwin

g se

dge

PC

TM

M2

92

9W

arm

mod

erat

e S

M R

HW

arm

RH

CA

MU

7st

ar s

edge

PC

TM

S31

12W

arm

mod

erat

e S

M R

HW

arm

RH

CA

NE

2N

ebra

ska

sedg

eP

CT

MM

29

12

War

m m

oder

ate

SM

RH

War

m R

HC

AN

I2bl

ack

alpi

ne s

edge

PAM

S21

11C

old

mod

erat

e S

M R

HC

old

RH

CA

NU

5to

rren

t se

dge

PC

TM

M2

92

2H

ot h

igh

SM

RH

War

m R

HC

AP

R5

clus

tere

d fi

eld

sedg

eP

CT

MW

2912

Col

d hi

gh S

M R

HC

old

RH

CA

RE

X-S

TO

C2

alpi

ne s

edge

s-w

este

rn n

eedl

egra

ssPC

GS

4011

Col

d dr

y U

HC

old

UH

Page 73: Potential Vegetation Hierarchy · boundaries were established by using aquatic rather than terrestrial ecological units (Maxwell et al. 1995, Seaber et al. 1987). Province M332, “middle

69

Potential Vegetation Hierarchy for the Blue Mountains Section of Northeastern Oregon…

Tabl

e 8–

Pot

enti

al v

eget

atio

n ty

pes

(PV

T)

of t

he B

lue

Mou

ntai

ns s

ecti

on,

orga

nize

d by

pot

enti

al v

eget

atio

n ty

pe c

odea (

cont

inue

d)

PV

T c

ode

(PL

AN

TS

code

)P

VT

com

mon

nam

eS

tatu

sE

cocl

ass

PA

GP

VG

CA

SC

10-S

AA

R13

nort

hern

sin

gles

pike

sed

ge-b

rook

sax

ifra

gePA

MS

2113

Col

d hi

gh S

M R

HC

old

RH

CA

SC

12H

olm

’s R

ocky

Mou

ntai

n se

dge

PAM

S31

11C

old

high

SM

RH

Col

d R

HC

AS

HS

held

on’s

sed

geP

CT

MM

29

32

Hot

mod

erat

e S

M R

HW

arm

RH

CA

SI2

shor

tbea

ked

sedg

eP

CT

MM

29

15

War

m h

igh

SM

RH

War

m R

HC

AS

T5

saw

beak

sed

geP

CT

MW

1926

War

m h

igh

SM

RH

War

m R

HC

AS

U6

brow

n se

dge

PCM

M2

93

0W

arm

mod

erat

e S

M R

HW

arm

RH

CA

UT

blad

der

sedg

ePA

MM

29

17

Coo

l hi

gh S

M R

HC

old

RH

CA

VE

6in

flat

ed s

edge

PAM

W19

23C

ool

high

SM

RH

Col

d R

HC

EL

E3

mou

ntai

n m

ahog

any

PC

TS

D49

War

m d

ry U

SD

ry U

SC

EL

E3/

AG

SP

mou

ntai

n m

ahog

any/

blue

bunc

h w

heat

gras

sP

CT

SD

4112

War

m d

ry U

SD

ry U

SC

EL

E3/

CA

GE

2m

ount

ain

mah

ogan

y/el

k se

dge

PCS

D40

War

m m

oist

US

Moi

st U

SC

EL

E3/

CA

GE

2m

ount

ain

mah

ogan

y/el

k se

dge

PCS

D41

13W

arm

moi

st U

SM

oist

US

CE

LE

3/F

EID

-AG

SP

mou

ntai

n m

ahog

any/

Idah

o fe

scue

-blu

ebun

ch w

heat

gras

sPA

SD

4111

War

m m

oist

US

Moi

st U

SC

EL

E3/

PO

NE

Wm

ount

ain

mah

ogan

y/W

heel

er’s

blu

egra

ssP

CT

SD

4114

War

m d

ry U

SD

ry U

SC

EL

E3-

PU

TR

2/A

GS

Pm

ount

ain

mah

ogan

y-bi

tter

brus

h/bl

uebu

nch

whe

atgr

ass

PC

TS

D41

15W

arm

moi

st U

SM

oist

US

CE

RE

2/A

GS

Pne

tlea

f ha

ckbe

rry/

blue

bunc

h w

heat

gras

sPA

SD

5611

Hot

moi

st U

SM

oist

US

CE

RE

2/B

RO

MU

netl

eaf

hack

berr

y/br

ome

PC

TS

D56

12H

ot l

ow S

M R

SL

ow S

M R

SC

EV

Esn

owbr

ush

cean

othu

sP

CT

SM

33W

arm

moi

st U

SM

oist

US

CIL

A2

droo

ping

woo

dree

dPC

MW

2927

Col

d hi

gh S

M R

HC

old

RH

CO

ST

4re

d os

ier

dogw

ood

PAS

W51

12W

arm

mod

erat

e S

M R

SW

arm

RS

CO

ST

4/A

TF

Ire

d os

ier

dogw

ood/

lady

fern

PAS

W41

33W

arm

hig

h S

M R

SW

arm

RS

CO

ST

4/S

AA

R13

red

osie

r do

gwoo

d/br

ook

saxi

frag

eP

CT

SW

5118

War

m h

igh

SM

RS

War

m R

SC

RD

O2/

ME

SIC

FO

RB

blac

k ha

wth

orn/

mes

ic f

orb

PC

TS

W31

11H

ot l

ow S

M R

SL

ow S

M R

SD

AU

N-L

OL

E2

ones

pike

oat

gras

s-sl

ende

rfru

it l

omat

ium

PAG

B91

14H

ot m

oist

UH

Moi

st U

HD

EC

Etu

fted

hai

rgra

ssPA

MM

19

12

Coo

l m

oder

ate

SM

RH

Col

d R

HE

LB

Ede

lica

te s

pike

rush

PCM

S41

11C

old

high

SM

RH

Col

d R

HE

LC

I2ba

sin

wil

drye

PC

TG

B71

11H

ot v

ery

moi

st U

HM

oist

UH

EL

PA3

cree

ping

spi

keru

shPA

MW

4912

Hot

hig

h S

M R

HW

arm

RH

EL

PA6

few

flow

ered

spi

keru

shPA

MW

4911

Col

d hi

gh S

M R

HC

old

RH

EQ

AR

com

mon

hor

seta

ilPA

FW

4212

War

m m

oder

ate

SM

RH

War

m R

HE

RD

O-P

OS

A12

Dou

glas

’ bu

ckw

heat

-San

dber

g’s

blue

gras

sP

CT

FM

9111

Hot

dry

UH

Dry

UH

ER

FL

4-P

EC

Ogo

lden

buc

kwhe

at-c

oile

d lo

usew

ort

PCF

S81

16C

ool

dry

UH

Col

d U

HE

RIO

G-P

HO

R2

buck

whe

at/O

rego

n bl

adde

rpod

PAS

D93

22H

ot d

ry U

HD

ry U

HE

RS

T4-

PO

SA

12st

rict

buc

kwhe

at/S

andb

erg’

s bl

uegr

ass

PC

TF

M91

12H

ot d

ry U

HD

ry U

HE

RU

M (

RID

GE

)su

lphu

rflo

wer

(ri

dge)

PC

TF

M91

13H

ot d

ry U

HD

ry U

HF

EID

(A

LP

INE

)Id

aho

fesc

ue (

alpi

ne)

PC

TG

S12

Col

d m

oist

UH

Col

d U

HF

EID

-AG

SP

Idah

o fe

scue

-blu

ebun

ch w

heat

gras

sPA

GB

59W

arm

moi

st U

HM

oist

UH

FE

ID-A

GS

P (

RID

GE

)Id

aho

fesc

ue-b

lueb

unch

whe

atgr

ass

(rid

ge)

PC

TG

B59

15W

arm

moi

st U

HM

oist

UH

FE

ID-A

GS

P-B

AS

A3

Idah

o fe

scue

-blu

ebun

ch w

heat

gras

s-ar

row

leaf

bal

sam

root

PAG

B59

17W

arm

moi

st U

HM

oist

UH

FE

ID-A

GS

P-C

YT

EF

Idah

o fe

scue

-blu

ebun

ch w

heat

gras

s-cy

mop

teru

sPA

GB

5925

War

m d

ry U

HD

ry U

HF

EID

-AG

SP

-FR

AL

C2

Idah

o fe

scue

-blu

ebun

ch w

heat

gras

s-C

usic

k’s

fras

era

PAG

B59

26C

ool

moi

st U

HC

old

UH

FE

ID-A

GS

P-L

UP

INId

aho

fesc

ue-b

lueb

unch

whe

atgr

ass-

lupi

nePA

GB

5916

War

m m

oist

UH

Moi

st U

HF

EID

-AG

SP

-PH

CO

10Id

aho

fesc

ue-b

lueb

unch

whe

atgr

ass-

Sna

ke R

iver

phl

oxPA

GB

5918

War

m m

oist

UH

Moi

st U

HF

EID

-AG

SP

-PH

LO

XId

aho

fesc

ue-b

lueb

unch

whe

atgr

ass-

phlo

xPA

GB

5931

War

m m

oist

UH

Moi

st U

HF

EID

-AG

SP

-PO

NE

WId

aho

fesc

ue-b

lueb

unch

whe

atgr

ass-

Whe

eler

’s b

lueg

rass

PCG

B59

27W

arm

dry

UH

Dry

UH

Page 74: Potential Vegetation Hierarchy · boundaries were established by using aquatic rather than terrestrial ecological units (Maxwell et al. 1995, Seaber et al. 1987). Province M332, “middle

70

GENERAL TECHNICAL REPORT PNW-GTR-709

Tabl

e 8–

Pot

enti

al v

eget

atio

n ty

pes

(PV

T)

of t

he B

lue

Mou

ntai

ns s

ecti

on,

orga

nize

d by

pot

enti

al v

eget

atio

n ty

pe c

odea (

cont

inue

d)

PV

T c

ode

(PL

AN

TS

code

)P

VT

com

mon

nam

eS

tatu

sE

cocl

ass

PA

GP

VG

FE

ID-C

AG

E2

Idah

o fe

scue

-elk

sed

geP

CT

GB

5922

War

m m

oist

UH

Moi

st U

HF

EID

-CA

HO

5Id

aho

fesc

ue-H

ood’

s se

dge

PAG

B59

21W

arm

moi

st U

HM

oist

UH

FE

ID-D

AIN

-CA

PE

7Id

aho

fesc

ue-t

imbe

r oa

tgra

ss-L

iddo

n’s

sedg

ePA

GB

5920

War

m v

ery

moi

st U

HM

oist

UH

FE

ID-D

AU

NId

aho

Fes

cue-

ones

pike

oat

gras

sP

CT

GB

5932

War

m d

ry U

HD

ry U

HF

EID

-GE

TR

Idah

o fe

scue

-red

ave

nsP

CT

GB

5923

Coo

l m

oist

UH

Col

d U

HF

EID

-KO

CR

(H

IGH

)Id

aho

fesc

ue-p

rair

ie j

uneg

rass

(hi

gh e

leva

tion

)PA

GB

5913

Coo

l m

oist

UH

Col

d U

HF

EID

-KO

CR

(L

OW

)Id

aho

fesc

ue-p

rair

ie j

uneg

rass

(lo

w e

leva

tion

)PA

GB

5914

War

m m

oist

UH

Moi

st U

HF

EID

-KO

CR

(M

OU

ND

)Id

aho

fesc

ue-p

rair

ie j

uneg

rass

(m

ound

)PA

GB

5912

Coo

l m

oist

UH

Col

d U

HF

EID

-KO

CR

(R

IDG

E)

Idah

o fe

scue

-pra

irie

jun

egra

ss (

ridg

e)PA

GB

5911

Coo

l m

oist

UH

Col

d U

HF

EID

-PE

SP

2Id

aho

fesc

ue-W

allo

wa

pens

tem

onP

CT

GB

5924

Coo

l m

oist

UH

Col

d U

HF

EL

LF

IEL

Dfe

llfi

eld

PCG

S60

Col

d dr

y U

HC

old

UH

FE

SC

-FE

IDro

ugh

fesc

ue-I

daho

fes

cue

PCG

B60

11C

old

dry

UH

Col

d U

HF

EV

Igr

een

fesc

uePA

GS

11C

old

moi

st U

HC

old

UH

FE

VI-

AG

CA

2gr

een

fesc

ue-b

eard

ed w

heat

gras

sPC

GS

1118

Col

d m

oist

UH

Col

d U

HF

EV

I-C

AH

O5

gree

n fe

scue

-Hoo

d’s

sedg

eP

CT

GS

1111

Col

d m

oist

UH

Col

d U

HF

EV

I-C

AR

O5

gree

n fe

scue

-Ros

s’ s

edge

PC

TG

S11

14C

old

moi

st U

HC

old

UH

FE

VI-

CA

SC

12gr

een

fesc

ue-H

olm

’s R

ocky

Mou

ntai

n se

dge

PCG

S11

19C

old

moi

st U

HC

old

UH

FE

VI-

JUPA

gree

n fe

scue

-Par

ry’s

rus

hPA

GS

1113

Col

d dr

y U

HC

old

UH

FE

VI-

LIC

A2

gree

n fe

scue

-Can

by’s

lov

age

PCG

S11

17C

old

moi

st U

HC

old

UH

FE

VI-

LU

LA

3gr

een

fesc

ue-s

purr

ed l

upin

ePA

GS

1112

Col

d m

oist

UH

Col

d U

HF

EV

I-P

EN

ST

gree

n fe

scue

-pen

stem

onP

CT

GS

1115

Col

d m

oist

UH

Col

d U

HF

EV

I-S

TO

C2

gree

n fe

scue

-wes

tern

nee

dleg

rass

PC

TG

S11

16C

old

moi

st U

HC

old

UH

GL

EL

tall

man

nagr

ass

PAM

M2

92

5W

arm

hig

h S

M R

HW

arm

RH

GL

SPA

/AG

SP

spin

y gr

ease

bush

/blu

ebun

ch w

heat

gras

sPA

SD

65H

ot d

ry U

SD

ry U

SG

RU

Sgr

usPC

FS

92C

old

dry

UH

Col

d U

HH

EL

A4-

EL

GL

com

mon

cow

pars

nip/

blue

wil

drye

PCS

W31

24W

arm

mod

erat

e S

M R

HW

arm

RH

JUB

AB

alti

c ru

shP

CT

MW

3912

War

m m

oder

ate

SM

RH

War

m R

HJU

CO

6m

ount

ain

juni

per

PCC

JC1

War

m m

oist

US

Moi

st U

SJU

OC

/AG

SP

wes

tern

jun

iper

/blu

ebun

ch w

heat

gras

sP

CT

CJG

113

Hot

dry

UW

Dry

UW

JUO

C/A

RA

R8

wes

tern

jun

iper

/low

sag

ebru

shP

CT

CJS

1H

ot d

ry U

WD

ry U

WJU

OC

/AR

AR

8/F

EID

wes

tern

jun

iper

/low

sag

ebru

sh/I

daho

fes

cue

PAC

JS11

2H

ot d

ry U

WD

ry U

WJU

OC

/AR

RI2

wes

tern

jun

iper

/sti

ff s

ageb

rush

PC

TC

JS8

Hot

dry

UW

Dry

UW

JUO

C/A

RR

I2 (

SC

AB

)w

este

rn j

unip

er/s

tiff

sag

ebru

sh (

scab

land

)P

CT

CJS

811

Hot

dry

UW

Dry

UW

JUO

C/A

RT

RV

/FE

ID-A

GS

Pw

este

rn j

unip

er/m

ount

ain

big

sage

brus

h/Id

aho

fesc

ue-b

lueb

unch

whe

atgr

ass

PC

TC

JS2

Hot

moi

st U

WM

oist

UW

JUO

C/C

EL

E3/

CA

GE

2w

este

rn j

unip

er/m

ount

ain

mah

ogan

y/el

k se

dge

PC

TC

JS42

Hot

moi

st U

WM

oist

UW

JUO

C/C

EL

E3/

FE

ID-A

GS

Pw

este

rn j

unip

er/m

ount

ain

mah

ogan

y/Id

aho

fesc

ue-b

lueb

unch

whe

atgr

ass

PAC

JS41

Hot

moi

st U

WM

oist

UW

JUO

C/F

EID

-AG

SP

wes

tern

jun

iper

/Ida

ho f

escu

e-bl

uebu

nch

whe

atgr

ass

PAC

JG11

1H

ot m

oist

UW

Moi

st U

WJU

OC

/PU

TR

2/F

EID

-AG

SP

wes

tern

jun

iper

/bit

terb

rush

/Ida

ho f

escu

e-bl

uebu

nch

whe

atgr

ass

PAC

JS32

1H

ot m

oist

UW

Moi

st U

WJU

PA-A

GG

LP

arry

’s r

ush-

pale

ago

seri

sPC

GS

4013

Col

d dr

y U

HC

old

UH

JUS

C2/

CE

LE

3R

ocky

Mou

ntai

n ju

nipe

r-m

ount

ain

mah

ogan

yPC

CJS

5W

arm

dry

UF

Dry

UF

KA

MI/

CA

NI2

alpi

ne l

aure

l/bl

ack

alpi

ne s

edge

PAS

W90

1C

old

high

SM

RS

Col

d R

SL

EC

OW

2 (R

IM)

Wal

low

a L

ewis

ia (

rim

)P

CT

FX

4111

Hot

dry

UH

Dry

UH

LE

GL

/CA

SC

12L

abra

dor

tea/

Hol

m’s

Roc

ky M

ount

ain

sedg

ePC

SW

0101

Col

d m

oder

ate

SM

RS

Col

d R

SL

EP

Y2-

MA

GL

2py

gmy

Lew

isia

-clu

ster

tar

wee

dPC

FS

8113

Coo

l m

oist

UH

Col

d U

HL

INU

4-A

RL

O6

lina

nthu

s-lo

ngle

af a

rnic

aPC

FS

8115

Coo

l m

oist

UH

Col

d U

H

Page 75: Potential Vegetation Hierarchy · boundaries were established by using aquatic rather than terrestrial ecological units (Maxwell et al. 1995, Seaber et al. 1987). Province M332, “middle

71

Potential Vegetation Hierarchy for the Blue Mountains Section of Northeastern Oregon…

Tabl

e 8–

Pot

enti

al v

eget

atio

n ty

pes

(PV

T)

of t

he B

lue

Mou

ntai

ns s

ecti

on,

orga

nize

d by

pot

enti

al v

eget

atio

n ty

pe c

odea (

cont

inue

d)

PV

T c

ode

(PL

AN

TS

code

)P

VT

com

mon

nam

eS

tatu

sE

cocl

ass

PA

GP

VG

LIN

U4-

AR

LU

lina

nthu

s-w

hite

sag

ebru

shPC

FS

80C

ool

dry

UH

Col

d U

HL

INU

4-C

YT

EF

lina

nthu

s-cy

mop

teru

sPC

FS

1113

Coo

l dr

y U

HC

old

UH

LO

IN5/

AT

FI

twin

berr

y ho

neys

uckl

e/la

dyfe

rnPC

SW

0102

War

m m

oder

ate

SM

RS

War

m R

SM

EB

U-S

TO

C2

onio

ngra

ss-w

este

rn n

eedl

egra

ssP

CT

GB

5011

War

m d

ry U

HD

ry U

HM

ET

R3

buck

bean

PCF

W61

11W

arm

hig

h S

M R

HW

arm

RH

MO

OD

mou

ntai

n ba

lmPC

FS

8112

Coo

l dr

y U

HC

old

UH

NU

PO

2R

ocky

Mou

ntai

n po

ndli

lyPA

MT

10

Coo

l hi

gh S

M R

HC

old

RH

PE

RA

4-S

YO

R2

squa

w a

pple

-mou

ntai

n sn

owbe

rry

PC

TS

D30

Hot

moi

st U

SM

oist

US

PH

CA

11P

acif

ic n

ineb

ark

PCS

M19

01W

arm

low

SM

RS

Low

SM

RS

PH

EM

(M

OU

ND

S)

pink

mou

ntai

nhea

th (

mou

nds)

PAS

S19

12C

old

mod

erat

e S

M R

SC

old

RS

PH

LE

4 (T

AL

US

)sy

ring

a-bo

rder

ed t

alus

str

ips

PC

TN

TS

111

Hot

ver

y m

oist

US

Moi

st U

SP

HL

E4/

ME

SIC

FO

RB

Lew

is’

moc

kora

nge/

mes

ic f

orb

PC

TS

M30

01H

ot l

ow S

M R

SL

ow S

M R

SP

HL

OX

-CY

TE

Fph

lox-

cym

opte

ris

PCF

S81

17C

old

dry

UH

Col

d U

HP

HL

OX

-IV

GO

phlo

x-Iv

esia

PCF

S81

18C

old

dry

UH

Col

d U

HP

HM

A5-

SY

AL

mal

low

nin

ebar

k-co

mm

on s

now

berr

yP

CT

SM

19W

arm

moi

st U

SM

oist

US

PH

MA

5-S

YA

Lm

allo

w n

ineb

ark-

com

mon

sno

wbe

rry

PC

TS

M11

11W

arm

moi

st U

SM

oist

US

PIA

L/A

RA

C2

whi

teba

rk p

ine/

pric

kly

sand

wor

tP

CT

CA

F32

2C

old

dry

UF

Col

d U

FP

IAL

/CA

GE

2w

hite

bark

pin

e/el

k se

dge

PAC

AG

131

Col

d dr

y U

FC

old

UF

PIA

L/F

EV

Iw

hite

bark

pin

e/gr

een

fesc

uePA

CA

G22

1C

old

dry

UF

Col

d U

FP

IAL

/JU

CO

6-A

RN

Ew

hite

bark

pin

e/m

ount

ain

juni

per-

pine

mat

man

zani

taPC

CA

S42

2C

old

dry

UF

Col

d U

FP

IAL

/LU

AR

3w

hite

bark

pin

e/si

lver

y lu

pine

PCC

AF

323

Col

d dr

y U

FC

old

UF

PIA

L/R

IMO

2/P

OP

U3

whi

teba

rk p

ine/

mou

ntai

n go

oseb

erry

/Jac

ob’s

lad

der

PAC

AS

512

Col

d dr

y U

FC

old

UF

PIA

L/V

AS

C/A

RA

C2

whi

teba

rk p

ine/

grou

se h

uckl

eber

ry/p

rick

ly s

andw

ort

PCC

AS

313

Col

d dr

y U

FC

old

UF

PIA

L/V

AS

C/A

RC

O9

whi

teba

rk p

ine/

grou

se h

uckl

eber

ry/h

eart

leaf

arn

ica

PCC

AS

312

Col

d dr

y U

FC

old

UF

PIA

L/V

AS

C/L

UH

I4w

hite

bark

pin

e/gr

ouse

huc

kleb

erry

/sm

ooth

woo

drus

hPA

CA

S31

1C

old

dry

UF

Col

d U

FP

ICO

(AB

GR

)/A

LS

I3lo

dgep

ole

pine

(gra

nd f

ir)/

Sit

ka a

lder

PC

TC

LS

58C

ool

very

moi

st U

FM

oist

UF

PIC

O(A

BG

R)/

AR

NE

lodg

epol

e pi

ne(g

rand

fir

)/pi

nem

at m

anza

nita

PC

TC

LS

57C

ool

dry

UF

Col

d U

FP

ICO

(AB

GR

)/C

AR

Ulo

dgep

ole

pine

(gra

nd f

ir)/

pine

gras

sP

CT

CL

G21

Coo

l dr

y U

FC

old

UF

PIC

O(A

BG

R)/

LIB

O3

lodg

epol

e pi

ne(g

rand

fir

)/tw

infl

ower

PC

TC

LF

211

Coo

l m

oist

UF

Moi

st U

FP

ICO

(AB

GR

)/V

AM

Elo

dgep

ole

pine

(gra

nd f

ir)/

big

huck

lebe

rry

PC

TC

LS

513

Coo

l m

oist

UF

Moi

st U

FP

ICO

(AB

GR

)/V

AM

E/C

AR

Ulo

dgep

ole

pine

(gra

nd f

ir)/

big

huck

lebe

rry/

pine

gras

sP

CT

CL

S51

2C

ool

moi

st U

FM

oist

UF

PIC

O(A

BG

R)/

VA

ME

/PTA

Qlo

dgep

ole

pine

(gra

nd f

ir)/

big

huck

lebe

rry/

brac

ken

fern

PC

TC

LS

519

Coo

l m

oist

UF

Moi

st U

FP

ICO

(AB

GR

)/V

AM

E-L

IBO

3lo

dgep

ole

pine

(gra

nd f

ir)/

big

huck

lebe

rry/

twin

flow

erP

CT

CL

S5

Coo

l m

oist

UF

Moi

st U

FP

ICO

(AB

GR

)/V

AS

C/C

AR

Ulo

dgep

ole

pine

(gra

nd f

ir)/

grou

se h

uckl

eber

ry/p

ineg

rass

PC

TC

LS

417

Col

d dr

y U

FC

old

UF

PIC

O(A

BL

A)/

CA

GE

2lo

dgep

ole

pine

(sub

alpi

ne f

ir)/

elk

sedg

eP

CT

CL

G32

2C

old

dry

UF

Col

d U

FP

ICO

(AB

LA

)/S

TO

C2

lodg

epol

e pi

ne(s

ubal

pine

fir

)/w

este

rn n

eedl

egra

ssP

CT

CL

G11

Col

d dr

y U

FC

old

UF

PIC

O(A

BL

A)/

VA

ME

lodg

epol

e pi

ne(s

ubal

pine

fir

)/bi

g hu

ckle

berr

yP

CT

CL

S51

5C

ool

moi

st U

FM

oist

UF

PIC

O(A

BL

A)/

VA

ME

lodg

epol

e pi

ne(s

ubal

pine

fir

)/bi

g hu

ckle

berr

yP

CT

CL

S51

4C

ool

moi

st U

FM

oist

UF

PIC

O(A

BL

A)/

VA

ME

/CA

RU

lodg

epol

e pi

ne(s

ubal

pine

fir

)/bi

g hu

ckle

berr

y/pi

negr

ass

PC

TC

LS

516

Coo

l m

oist

UF

Moi

st U

FP

ICO

(AB

LA

)/V

AS

Clo

dgep

ole

pine

(sub

alpi

ne f

ir)/

grou

se h

uckl

eber

ryP

CT

CL

S41

8C

old

dry

UF

Col

d U

FP

ICO

(AB

LA

)/V

AS

C/P

OP

U3

lodg

epol

e pi

ne(s

ubal

pine

fir

)/gr

ouse

huc

kleb

erry

/Jac

ob’s

lad

der

PC

TC

LS

415

Col

d dr

y U

FC

old

UF

PIC

O/A

LIN

2/M

ES

IC F

OR

Blo

dgep

ole

pine

/mou

ntai

n al

der/

mes

ic f

orb

PCC

LM

511

Col

d m

oder

ate

SM

RF

Col

d R

FP

ICO

/CA

AQ

lodg

epol

e pi

ne/a

quat

ic s

edge

PAC

LM

114

Col

d hi

gh S

M R

FC

old

RF

PIC

O/C

AC

A4

lodg

epol

e pi

ne/b

luej

oint

ree

dgra

ssPC

CL

M11

7C

old

mod

erat

e S

M R

FC

old

RF

PIC

O/C

AL

A30

lodg

epol

e pi

ne/w

ooll

y se

dge

PCC

LM

116

Col

d m

oder

ate

SM

RF

Col

d R

F

Page 76: Potential Vegetation Hierarchy · boundaries were established by using aquatic rather than terrestrial ecological units (Maxwell et al. 1995, Seaber et al. 1987). Province M332, “middle

72

GENERAL TECHNICAL REPORT PNW-GTR-709

Tabl

e 8–

Pot

enti

al v

eget

atio

n ty

pes

(PV

T)

of t

he B

lue

Mou

ntai

ns s

ecti

on,

orga

nize

d by

pot

enti

al v

eget

atio

n ty

pe c

odea (

cont

inue

d)

PV

T c

ode

(PL

AN

TS

code

)P

VT

com

mon

nam

eS

tatu

sE

cocl

ass

PAG

PV

G

PIC

O/C

AR

Ulo

dgep

ole

pine

/pin

egra

ssPA

CL

S41

6C

ool

dry

UF

Col

d U

FP

ICO

/CA

SC

12lo

dgep

ole

pine

/Hol

m’s

Roc

ky M

ount

ain

sedg

ePC

CL

M11

8C

old

high

SM

RF

Col

d R

FP

ICO

/DE

CE

lodg

epol

e pi

ne/t

ufte

d ha

irgr

ass

PAC

LM

115

Col

d m

oder

ate

SM

RF

Col

d R

FP

ICO

/PO

PR

lodg

epol

e pi

ne/K

entu

cky

blue

gras

sP

CT

CL

M11

2C

old

low

SM

RF

Col

d R

FP

IEN

/AT

FI

Eng

elm

ann

spru

ce/l

adyf

ern

PC

TC

EF

334

Col

d hi

gh S

M R

FC

old

RF

PIE

N/B

RV

UE

ngel

man

n sp

ruce

/Col

umbi

a br

ome

PC

TC

EM

125

Col

d lo

w S

M R

FC

old

RF

PIE

N/C

AD

I6E

ngel

man

n sp

ruce

/sof

tlea

f se

dge

PAC

EM

121

Col

d hi

gh S

M R

FC

old

RF

PIE

N/C

ILA

2E

ngel

man

n sp

ruce

/dro

opin

g w

oodr

eed

PCC

EM

126

Col

d m

oder

ate

SM

RF

Col

d R

FP

IEN

/CO

ST

4E

ngel

man

n sp

ruce

/red

osi

er d

ogw

ood

PAC

ES

511

Col

d m

oder

ate

SM

RF

Col

d R

FP

IEN

/EQ

AR

Eng

elm

ann

spru

ce/c

omm

on h

orse

tail

PAC

EM

211

Col

d m

oder

ate

SM

RF

Col

d R

FP

IEN

/SE

TR

Eng

elm

ann

spru

ce/a

rrow

leaf

gro

unds

elPA

CE

F33

5C

old

high

SM

RF

Col

d R

FP

IEN

-AB

LA

/CA

SC

12E

ngel

man

n sp

ruce

-sub

alpi

ne f

ir/H

olm

’s R

ocky

Mou

ntai

n se

dge

PAC

EG

201

Col

d hi

gh S

M R

FC

old

RF

PIE

N-A

BL

A/S

ET

RE

ngel

man

n sp

ruce

-sub

alpi

ne f

ir/a

rrow

leaf

gro

unds

elPA

CE

M20

1C

old

high

SM

RF

Col

d R

FP

IFL

2/JU

CO

6li

mbe

r pi

ne/m

ount

ain

juni

per

PC

TC

AS

511

Col

d dr

y U

FC

old

UF

PIM

O3/

DE

CE

wes

tern

whi

te p

ine/

tuft

ed h

airg

rass

PC

TC

QM

111

War

m m

oder

ate

SM

RF

War

m R

FP

IPO

/AG

SP

pond

eros

a pi

ne/b

lueb

unch

whe

atgr

ass

PAC

PG

132

Hot

dry

UF

Dry

UF

PIP

O/A

GS

Ppo

nder

osa

pine

/blu

ebun

ch w

heat

gras

sPA

CP

G11

1H

ot d

ry U

FD

ry U

FP

IPO

/AR

AR

8po

nder

osa

pine

/low

sag

ebru

shP

CT

CP

S61

Hot

moi

st U

FD

ry U

FP

IPO

/AR

TR

V/C

AG

E2

pond

eros

a pi

ne/m

ount

ain

big

sage

brus

h/el

k se

dge

PC

TC

PS

132

Hot

dry

UF

Dry

UF

PIP

O/A

RT

RV

/FE

ID-A

GS

Ppo

nder

osa

pine

/mou

ntai

n bi

g sa

gebr

ush/

Idah

o fe

scue

-blu

ebun

ch w

heat

gras

sPA

CP

S13

1H

ot d

ry U

FD

ry U

FP

IPO

/CA

GE

2po

nder

osa

pine

/elk

sed

gePA

CP

G22

2W

arm

dry

UF

Dry

UF

PIP

O/C

AR

Upo

nder

osa

pine

/pin

egra

ssPA

CP

G22

1W

arm

dry

UF

Dry

UF

PIP

O/C

EL

E3/

CA

GE

2po

nder

osa

pine

/mou

ntai

n m

ahog

any/

elk

sedg

ePA

CP

S23

2W

arm

dry

UF

Dry

UF

PIP

O/C

EL

E3/

FE

ID-A

GS

Ppo

nder

osa

pine

/mou

ntai

n m

ahog

any/

Idah

o fe

scue

-blu

ebun

ch w

heat

gras

sPA

CP

S23

4H

ot d

ry U

FD

ry U

FP

IPO

/CE

LE

3/P

ON

EW

pond

eros

a pi

ne/m

ount

ain

mah

ogan

y/W

heel

er’s

blu

egra

ssPA

CP

S23

3H

ot d

ry U

FD

ry U

FP

IPO

/CR

DO

2po

nder

osa

pine

/bla

ck h

awth

orn

PCC

PS

722

Hot

mod

erat

e S

M R

FW

arm

RF

PIP

O/F

EID

pond

eros

a pi

ne/I

daho

fes

cue

PAC

PG

131

Hot

dry

UF

Dry

UF

PIP

O/F

EID

pond

eros

a pi

ne/I

daho

fes

cue

PAC

PG

112

Hot

dry

UF

Dry

UF

PIP

O/P

ER

A4

pond

eros

a pi

ne/s

quaw

app

leP

CT

CP

S8

Hot

dry

UF

Dry

UF

PIP

O/P

OP

Rpo

nder

osa

pine

/Ken

tuck

y bl

uegr

ass

PC

TC

PM

112

Hot

low

SM

RF

Low

SM

RF

PIP

O/P

UT

R2/

AG

SP

pond

eros

a pi

ne/b

itte

rbru

sh/b

lueb

unch

whe

atgr

ass

PC

TC

PS

231

Hot

dry

UF

Dry

UF

PIP

O/P

UT

R2/

AG

SP

-PO

SA

12po

nder

osa

pine

/bit

terb

rush

/blu

ebun

ch w

heat

gras

s-S

andb

erg’

s bl

uegr

ass

PAC

PS

229

Hot

dry

UF

Dry

UF

PIP

O/P

UT

R2/

CA

GE

2po

nder

osa

pine

/bit

terb

rush

/elk

sed

gePA

CP

S22

2W

arm

dry

UF

Dry

UF

PIP

O/P

UT

R2/

CA

RO

5po

nder

osa

pine

/bit

terb

rush

/Ros

s’ s

edge

PAC

PS

221

War

m d

ry U

FD

ry U

FP

IPO

/PU

TR

2/F

EID

-AG

SP

pond

eros

a pi

ne/b

itte

rbru

sh/I

daho

fes

cue-

blue

bunc

h w

heat

gras

sPA

CP

S22

6H

ot d

ry U

FD

ry U

FP

IPO

/RH

GL

pond

eros

a pi

ne/s

moo

th s

umac

PC

TC

PS

9H

ot d

ry U

FD

ry U

FP

IPO

/SP

BE

2po

nder

osa

pine

/bir

chle

af s

pira

eaP

CT

CP

S52

3W

arm

dry

UF

Dry

UF

PIP

O/S

YA

Lpo

nder

osa

pine

/com

mon

sno

wbe

rry

PAC

PS

524

War

m d

ry U

FD

ry U

FP

IPO

/SY

AL

pond

eros

a pi

ne/c

omm

on s

now

berr

yPA

CP

S52

2W

arm

dry

UF

Dry

UF

PIP

O/S

YA

L (

FL

OO

DP

LA

IN)

pond

eros

a pi

ne/c

omm

on s

now

berr

y (f

lood

plai

n)PA

CP

S51

1H

ot l

ow S

M R

FL

ow S

M R

FP

IPO

/SY

OR

2po

nder

osa

pine

/mou

ntai

n sn

owbe

rry

PAC

PS

525

War

m d

ry U

FD

ry U

FP

IPO

-JU

OC

/CE

LE

3-S

YO

R2

pond

eros

a pi

ne-w

este

rn j

unip

er/m

ount

ain

mah

ogan

y-m

ount

ain

snow

berr

yP

CT

CP

C21

2H

ot d

ry U

FD

ry U

FP

OB

U-M

AG

L2

bulb

ous

blue

gras

s-cl

uste

r ta

rwee

dP

CT

GB

4411

Hot

dry

UH

Dry

UH

PO

FR

4sh

rubb

y ci

nque

foil

PCS

S60

Coo

l m

oist

US

Col

d U

SP

OF

R4/

DE

CE

shru

bby

cinq

uefo

il/t

ufte

d ha

irgr

ass

PAS

W51

13W

arm

mod

erat

e S

M R

SW

arm

RS

PO

FR

4/F

EID

shru

bby

cinq

uefo

il/I

daho

fes

cue

PC

TS

S49

19W

arm

moi

st U

SM

oist

US

Page 77: Potential Vegetation Hierarchy · boundaries were established by using aquatic rather than terrestrial ecological units (Maxwell et al. 1995, Seaber et al. 1987). Province M332, “middle

73

Potential Vegetation Hierarchy for the Blue Mountains Section of Northeastern Oregon…

Tabl

e 8–

Pot

enti

al v

eget

atio

n ty

pes

(PV

T)

of t

he B

lue

Mou

ntai

ns s

ecti

on,

orga

nize

d by

pot

enti

al v

eget

atio

n ty

pe c

odea

(con

tinu

ed)

PV

T c

ode

(PL

AN

TS

code

)P

VT

com

mon

nam

eS

tatu

sEco

clas

sP

AG

PV

G

PO

FR

4/P

OP

Rsh

rubb

y ci

nque

foil

/Ken

tuck

y bl

uegr

ass

PC

TS

W51

14W

arm

low

SM

RS

Low

SM

RS

PO

FR

4-B

EG

Lsh

rubb

y ci

nque

foil

-bog

bir

chP

CT

SS

6001

Col

d m

oder

ate

SM

RS

Col

d R

SP

OP

H (

CO

RN

ICE

S)

alpi

ne f

leec

eflo

wer

(co

rnic

es)

PCF

S59

16C

old

moi

st U

HC

old

UH

PO

PH

-AG

UR

-LIN

U4

alpi

ne f

leec

eflo

wer

-hor

sem

int-

lina

nthu

sPC

FS

5915

Coo

l dr

y U

HC

old

UH

PO

PH

-CA

GE

2-L

INU

4al

pine

fle

ecef

low

er-e

lk s

edge

-lin

anth

usPC

FS

5914

Coo

l dr

y U

HC

old

UH

PO

PH

-CA

RU

-CA

GE

2al

pine

fle

ecef

low

er-p

ineg

rass

-elk

sed

gePC

FS

5913

Coo

l dr

y U

HC

old

UH

PO

PH

-FE

VI

alpi

ne f

leec

eflo

wer

-gre

en f

escu

ePC

FS

5912

Col

d m

oist

UH

Col

d U

HP

OP

R (

DE

GE

N B

EN

CH

)K

entu

cky

blue

gras

s (d

egen

erat

ed b

ench

)P

CT

MD

31

12

Coo

l m

oist

UH

Col

d U

HP

OP

R (

DR

Y M

EA

DO

W)

Ken

tuck

y bl

uegr

ass

(dry

mea

dow

)P

CT

MD

31

11

War

m l

ow S

M R

HL

ow S

M R

HP

OS

A12

-DA

UN

San

dber

g’s

blue

gras

s-on

espi

ke o

atgr

ass

PAG

B91

11H

ot d

ry U

HD

ry U

HP

OS

A12

-SE

LA

San

dber

g’s

blue

gras

s-la

ncel

eaf

ston

ecro

pPC

GB

9112

War

m d

ry U

HD

ry U

HP

OT

R15

/AC

GL

blac

k co

tton

woo

d/R

ocky

Mou

ntai

n m

aple

PC

TH

CS

114

War

m m

oder

ate

SM

RF

War

m R

FP

OT

R15

/AL

IN2-

CO

ST

4bl

ack

cott

onw

ood/

mou

ntai

n al

der-

red

osie

r do

gwoo

dPA

HC

S11

3W

arm

mod

erat

e S

M R

FW

arm

RF

PO

TR

15/S

AL

A5

blac

k co

tton

woo

d/P

acif

ic w

illo

wPA

HC

S11

2H

ot m

oder

ate

SM

RF

War

m R

FP

OT

R15

/SY

AL

blac

k co

tton

woo

d/co

mm

on s

now

berr

yP

CT

HC

S31

1H

ot m

oder

ate

SM

RF

War

m R

FP

OT

R15

/SY

AL

blac

k co

tton

woo

d/co

mm

on s

now

berr

yP

CT

HC

S31

2H

ot m

oder

ate

SM

RF

War

m R

FP

OT

R5/

AL

IN2-

CO

ST

4qu

akin

g as

pen/

mou

ntai

n al

der-

red

osie

r do

gwoo

dP

CT

HQ

S22

2W

arm

mod

erat

e S

M R

FW

arm

RF

PO

TR

5/A

LIN

2-S

YA

Lqu

akin

g as

pen/

mou

ntai

n al

der-

com

mon

sno

wbe

rry

PC

TH

QS

223

War

m m

oder

ate

SM

RF

War

m R

FP

OT

R5/

CA

AQ

quak

ing

aspe

n/aq

uati

c se

dge

PC

TH

QM

212

War

m h

igh

SM

RF

War

m R

FP

OT

R5/

CA

CA

4qu

akin

g as

pen/

blue

join

t re

edgr

ass

PC

TH

QM

123

War

m m

oder

ate

SM

RF

War

m R

FP

OT

R5/

CA

GE

2qu

akin

g as

pen/

elk

sedg

ePC

HQ

G11

2C

ool

very

moi

st U

FM

oist

UF

PO

TR

5/C

AL

A30

quak

ing

aspe

n/w

ooll

y se

dge

PAH

QM

211

War

m m

oder

ate

SM

RF

War

m R

FP

OT

R5/

ME

SIC

FO

RB

quak

ing

aspe

n/m

esic

for

bP

CT

HQ

M51

1W

arm

mod

erat

e S

M R

FW

arm

RF

PO

TR

5/P

OP

Rqu

akin

g as

pen/

Ken

tuck

y bl

uegr

ass

PC

TH

QM

122

Hot

low

SM

RF

Low

SM

RF

PO

TR

5/S

YA

Lqu

akin

g as

pen/

com

mon

sno

wbe

rry

PC

TH

QS

221

Hot

mod

erat

e S

M R

FW

arm

RF

PR

EM

bitt

er c

herr

yPC

SM

34W

arm

moi

st U

SM

oist

US

PS

ME

/AC

GL

-PH

MA

5D

ougl

as-f

ir/R

ocky

Mou

ntai

n m

aple

-mal

low

nin

ebar

kPA

CD

S72

2W

arm

moi

st U

FM

oist

UF

PS

ME

/AC

GL

-PH

MA

5 (F

LO

OD

PL

AIN

)D

ougl

as-f

ir/R

ocky

Mou

ntai

n m

aple

-mal

low

nin

ebar

k (f

lood

plai

n)PA

CD

S72

4W

arm

mod

erat

e S

M R

FW

arm

RF

PS

ME

/AC

GL

-SY

OR

2D

ougl

as-f

ir/R

ocky

Mou

ntai

n m

aple

-mou

ntai

n sn

owbe

rry

PCC

DS

725

War

m m

oist

UF

Moi

st U

FP

SM

E/A

RN

E/C

AG

E2

Dou

glas

-fir

/pin

emat

man

zani

ta/e

lk s

edge

PAC

DS

664

War

m d

ry U

FD

ry U

FP

SM

E/C

AG

E2

Dou

glas

-fir

/elk

sed

gePA

CD

G11

1W

arm

dry

UF

Dry

UF

PS

ME

/CA

RU

Dou

glas

-fir

/pin

egra

ssPA

CD

G12

1W

arm

dry

UF

Dry

UF

PS

ME

/CA

RU

Dou

glas

-fir

/pin

egra

ssPA

CD

G11

2W

arm

dry

UF

Dry

UF

PS

ME

/CE

LE

3/C

AG

E2

Dou

glas

-fir

/mou

ntai

n m

ahog

any/

elk

sedg

eP

CT

CD

SD

War

m d

ry U

FD

ry U

FP

SM

E/H

OD

ID

ougl

as-f

ir/o

cean

spra

yPA

CD

S61

1W

arm

moi

st U

FM

oist

UF

PS

ME

/PH

MA

5D

ougl

as-f

ir/m

allo

w n

ineb

ark

PAC

DS

711

War

m d

ry U

FD

ry U

FP

SM

E/R

IMO

2/P

OP

U3

Dou

glas

-fir

/mou

ntai

n go

oseb

erry

/Jac

ob’s

lad

der

PCC

DS

911

Col

d dr

y U

FC

old

UF

PS

ME

/SP

BE

2D

ougl

as-f

ir/b

irch

leaf

spi

raea

PAC

DS

634

War

m d

ry U

FD

ry U

FP

SM

E/S

YA

LD

ougl

as-f

ir/c

omm

on s

now

berr

yPA

CD

S62

2W

arm

dry

UF

Dry

UF

PS

ME

/SY

AL

Dou

glas

-fir

/com

mon

sno

wbe

rry

PAC

DS

624

War

m d

ry U

FD

ry U

FP

SM

E/S

YA

L (

FL

OO

DP

LA

IN)

Dou

glas

-fir

/com

mon

sno

wbe

rry

(flo

odpl

ain)

PAC

DS

628

War

m l

ow S

M R

FL

ow S

M R

FP

SM

E/S

YO

R2

Dou

glas

-fir

/mou

ntai

n sn

owbe

rry

PAC

DS

623

War

m d

ry U

FD

ry U

FP

SM

E/S

YO

R2

Dou

glas

-fir

/mou

ntai

n sn

owbe

rry

PAC

DS

625

War

m d

ry U

FD

ry U

FP

SM

E/S

YO

R2/

CA

GE

2D

ougl

as-f

ir/m

ount

ain

snow

berr

y/el

k se

dge

PCC

DS

642

War

m d

ry U

FD

ry U

FP

SM

E/T

RC

AD

ougl

as-f

ir/f

alse

bug

bane

PC

TC

DF

313

War

m m

oder

ate

SM

RF

War

m R

F

Page 78: Potential Vegetation Hierarchy · boundaries were established by using aquatic rather than terrestrial ecological units (Maxwell et al. 1995, Seaber et al. 1987). Province M332, “middle

74

GENERAL TECHNICAL REPORT PNW-GTR-709

Tabl

e 8–

Pot

enti

al v

eget

atio

n ty

pes

(PV

T)

of t

he B

lue

Mou

ntai

ns s

ecti

on,

orga

nize

d by

pot

enti

al v

eget

atio

n ty

pe c

odea (

cont

inue

d)

PV

T c

ode

(PL

AN

TS

code

)P

VT

com

mon

nam

eS

tatu

sE

cocl

ass

PA

GP

VG

PS

ME

/VA

ME

Dou

glas

-fir

/big

huc

kleb

erry

PAC

DS

812

War

m d

ry U

FD

ry U

FP

SM

E/V

AM

ED

ougl

as-f

ir/b

ig h

uckl

eber

ryPA

CD

S82

1W

arm

dry

UF

Dry

UF

PS

ME

-PIP

O-J

UO

C/F

EID

Dou

glas

-fir

-pon

dero

sa p

ine-

wes

tern

jun

iper

/Ida

ho f

escu

ePC

CD

G33

3W

arm

dry

UF

Dry

UF

PTA

Q-C

AH

O5

brac

ken

fern

-Hoo

d’s

sedg

ePC

FS

8111

Coo

l m

oist

UH

Col

d U

HP

UPA

3w

eak

alka

ligr

ass

PAM

M2

92

6W

arm

hig

h S

M R

HW

arm

RH

PU

TR

2/A

GS

Pbi

tter

brus

h/bl

uebu

nch

whe

atgr

ass

PAS

D31

12H

ot m

oist

US

Moi

st U

SP

UT

R2/

ER

DO

bitt

erbr

ush/

Dou

glas

’ bu

ckw

heat

PC

TS

D31

26W

arm

dry

US

Dry

US

PU

TR

2/F

EID

-AG

SP

bitt

erbr

ush/

Idah

o fe

scue

-blu

ebun

ch w

heat

gras

sPA

SD

3111

War

m m

oist

US

Moi

st U

SP

UT

R2-

AR

TR

V/F

EID

bitt

erbr

ush-

mou

ntai

n bi

g sa

gebr

ush/

Idah

o fe

scue

PC

TS

D31

25W

arm

moi

st U

SM

oist

US

PU

TR

2-A

RT

RV

/FE

ID-A

GS

Pbi

tter

brus

h-m

ount

ain

big

sage

brus

h/Id

aho

fesc

ue-b

lueb

unch

whe

atgr

ass

PAS

D31

24W

arm

moi

st U

SM

oist

US

RH

AL

/ME

SIC

FO

RB

alde

rlea

f bu

ckth

orn/

mes

ic f

orb

PC

TS

W51

17W

arm

mod

erat

e S

M R

SW

arm

RS

RH

GL

/AG

SP

smoo

th s

umac

/blu

ebun

ch w

heat

gras

sPA

SD

6121

Hot

dry

US

Dry

US

RIB

ES

/CIL

A2

curr

ants

/dro

opin

g w

oodr

eed

PC

TS

W51

11W

arm

hig

h S

M R

SW

arm

RS

RIB

ES

/GL

EL

curr

ants

/tal

l m

anna

gras

sP

CT

SW

5116

War

m h

igh

SM

RS

War

m R

SR

IBE

S/M

ES

IC F

OR

Bcu

rran

ts/m

esic

for

bP

CT

SW

5115

War

m m

oder

ate

SM

RS

War

m R

SR

OC

K O

UT

CR

OP

rock

out

crop

PCF

S91

Col

d dr

y U

HC

old

UH

RU

BA

Bar

ton’

s ra

spbe

rry

PCS

M50

01H

ot l

ow S

M R

SL

ow S

M R

SR

UD

I2H

imal

ayan

bla

ckbe

rry

PCS

M50

02H

ot m

oder

ate

SM

RS

War

m R

SR

UO

C2

wes

tern

con

eflo

wer

PC

TF

S81

01W

arm

mod

erat

e S

M R

HW

arm

RH

RU

OC

2-M

AG

L2

wes

tern

con

eflo

wer

-clu

ster

tar

wee

dPC

FS

81C

ool

moi

st U

HC

old

UH

RU

PAth

imbl

eber

ryP

CT

SM

5912

Hot

mod

erat

e S

M R

SW

arm

RS

SA

AR

13br

ook

saxi

frag

eP

CT

FW

6113

War

m h

igh

SM

RH

War

m R

HS

AA

R27

arct

ic w

illo

wPA

SW

1133

Col

d hi

gh S

M R

SC

old

RS

SA

BO

2/C

AS

C12

Boo

th’s

wil

low

/Hol

m’s

Roc

ky M

ount

ain

sedg

ePA

SW

1138

Col

d hi

gh S

M R

SC

old

RS

SA

BO

2/C

AV

E6

Boo

th’s

wil

low

/inf

late

d se

dge

PCS

W11

39C

old

high

SM

RS

Col

d R

SS

AC

O2/

CA

PR

5un

derg

reen

wil

low

/clu

ster

ed f

ield

sed

gePC

SW

1128

Col

d hi

gh S

M R

SC

old

RS

SA

CO

2/C

AS

C12

unde

rgre

en w

illo

w/H

olm

’s R

ocky

Mou

ntai

n se

dge

PAS

W11

21C

old

high

SM

RS

Col

d R

SS

AC

O2/

CA

UT

unde

rgre

en w

illo

w/b

ladd

er s

edge

PC

TS

W11

27C

old

high

SM

RS

Col

d R

SS

AD

R/S

ET

RD

rum

mon

d’s

wil

low

/arr

owle

af g

roun

dsel

PCS

W11

37C

old

high

SM

RS

Col

d R

SS

AE

A-S

AT

W/C

AA

QE

astw

ood

wil

low

-Tw

eedy

wil

low

/aqu

atic

sed

gePC

SW

1129

War

m h

igh

SM

RS

War

m R

SS

AE

Xco

yote

wil

low

PAS

W11

17W

arm

mod

erat

e S

M R

SW

arm

RS

SA

FA/A

LVA

Far

r’s

wil

low

/Pac

ific

oni

onPC

SW

1134

Col

d hi

gh S

M R

SC

old

RS

SA

LE

/ME

SIC

FO

RB

Lem

mon

’s w

illo

w/m

esic

for

bP

CT

SW

1135

War

m m

oder

ate

SM

RS

War

m R

SS

AL

IX/C

AA

Qw

illo

w/a

quat

ic s

edge

PAS

W11

14C

ool

high

SM

RS

Col

d R

SS

AL

IX/C

AC

A4

wil

low

/blu

ejoi

nt r

eedg

rass

PAS

W11

24C

ool

mod

erat

e S

M R

SC

old

RS

SA

LIX

/CA

LA

30w

illo

w/w

ooll

y se

dge

PAS

W11

12W

arm

mod

erat

e S

M R

SW

arm

RS

SA

LIX

/CA

UT

wil

low

/bla

dder

sed

gePA

SW

1123

War

m h

igh

SM

RS

War

m R

SS

AL

IX/M

ES

IC F

OR

Bw

illo

w/m

esic

for

bP

CT

SW

1125

War

m m

oder

ate

SM

RS

War

m R

SS

AL

IX/P

OP

Rw

illo

w/K

entu

cky

blue

gras

sP

CT

SW

1111

War

m l

ow S

M R

SL

ow S

M R

SS

AR

I2ri

gid

wil

low

PC

TS

W11

26H

ot m

oder

ate

SM

RS

War

m R

SS

AS

C/E

LG

LS

coul

er’s

wil

low

/blu

e w

ildr

yePC

SW

1130

War

m l

ow S

M R

SL

ow S

M R

SS

AS

I2/E

QA

RS

itka

wil

low

/com

mon

hor

seta

ilPC

SW

1136

War

m h

igh

SM

RS

War

m R

SS

CM

I2sm

allf

ruit

bul

rush

PAM

M2

92

4W

arm

hig

h S

M R

HW

arm

RH

SC

RE

Esc

ree

PCF

S90

Col

d dr

y U

HC

old

UH

Page 79: Potential Vegetation Hierarchy · boundaries were established by using aquatic rather than terrestrial ecological units (Maxwell et al. 1995, Seaber et al. 1987). Province M332, “middle

75

Potential Vegetation Hierarchy for the Blue Mountains Section of Northeastern Oregon…

Tabl

e 8–

Pot

enti

al v

eget

atio

n ty

pes

(PV

T)

of t

he B

lue

Mou

ntai

ns s

ecti

on,

orga

nize

d by

pot

enti

al v

eget

atio

n ty

pe c

odea (

cont

inue

d)

PV

T c

ode

(PL

AN

TS

code

)P

VT

com

mon

nam

eS

tatu

sE

cocl

ass

PA

GP

VG

SE

TR

arro

wle

af g

roun

dsel

PAF

W42

11W

arm

hig

h S

M R

HW

arm

RH

SE

TR

-MIL

E2

arro

wle

af g

roun

dsel

-pur

ple

mon

keyf

low

erPA

FW

4214

Coo

l hi

gh S

M R

HC

old

RH

SPA

N2

narr

owle

af b

ur-r

eed

PAW

L01

08C

old

high

SM

RH

Col

d R

HS

PC

R (

TE

RR

AC

E)

sand

dro

psee

d (t

erra

ce)

PAG

B12

11H

ot d

ry U

HD

ry U

HS

TO

C2

wes

tern

nee

dleg

rass

PC

TG

S10

Coo

l m

oist

UH

Col

d U

HS

TO

C2-

SIH

Y (

AL

PIN

E)

wes

tern

nee

dleg

rass

-squ

irre

ltai

l (a

lpin

e)P

CT

GS

50W

arm

dry

UH

Dry

UH

SY

AL

com

mon

sno

wbe

rry

PC

TS

M31

War

m m

oist

US

Moi

st U

SS

YA

L (

FL

OO

DP

LA

IN)

com

mon

sno

wbe

rry

(flo

odpl

ain)

PC

TS

M31

10H

ot m

oder

ate

SM

RS

War

m R

SS

YA

L/F

EID

-AG

SP

-LU

SE

4co

mm

on s

now

berr

y/Id

aho

fesc

ue-b

lueb

unch

whe

atgr

ass-

silk

y lu

pine

PC

TG

B51

21W

arm

moi

st U

SM

oist

US

SY

AL

/FE

ID-K

OC

Rco

mm

on s

now

berr

y/Id

aho

fesc

ue-p

rair

ie j

uneg

rass

PC

TG

B59

19W

arm

moi

st U

SM

oist

US

SY

AL

-RO

SA

5co

mm

on s

now

berr

y-ro

seP

CT

SM

3111

War

m m

oist

US

Moi

st U

SS

YO

R2

mou

ntai

n sn

owbe

rry

PC

TS

M32

War

m m

oist

US

Moi

st U

ST

SM

E/V

AM

Em

ount

ain

hem

lock

/big

huc

kleb

erry

PAC

MS

231

Col

d dr

y U

FC

old

UF

TS

ME

/VA

SC

mou

ntai

n he

mlo

ck/g

rous

e hu

ckle

berr

yPA

CM

S13

1C

old

dry

UF

Col

d U

FT

UR

Ftu

rfPC

GS

70C

old

dry

UH

Col

d U

HT

YL

Aco

mm

on c

atta

ilPC

MT

81

21

Hot

hig

h S

M R

HW

arm

RH

VE

AM

2A

mer

ican

spe

edw

ell

PAF

W61

12W

arm

hig

h S

M R

HW

arm

RH

VE

RA

Tfa

lse

hell

ebor

eP

CT

FW

51W

arm

mod

erat

e S

M R

HW

arm

RH

VE

RA

Tfa

lse

hell

ebor

ePC

FW

5121

War

m m

oder

ate

SM

RH

War

m R

H

a Thi

s ta

bula

r su

mm

ary

is o

rgan

ized

alp

habe

tica

lly

by P

VT

cod

e (U

SD

A F

ores

t S

ervi

ce 2

002)

. C

olum

n de

scri

ptio

ns a

re:

“P

VT

cod

e” p

rovi

des

an a

lpha

num

eric

cod

e fo

r ea

ch p

oten

tial

veg

etat

ion

type

; se

e “n

amin

g co

nven

tion

s” s

ecti

on f

or i

nfor

mat

ion

abou

t de

riva

tion

of

PV

T c

odes

. N

ote

that

a P

VT

code

mig

ht b

e li

sted

tw

ice,

in

whi

ch c

ase

the

sam

e po

tent

ial

vege

tati

on t

ype

was

inc

lude

d in

mor

e th

an o

ne p

oten

tial

veg

etat

ion

clas

sifi

cati

on f

or t

he B

lue

Mou

ntai

ns s

ecti

on (

Cro

we

and

Cla

usni

tzer

199

7, J

ohns

on 2

004,

Joh

nson

and

Cla

usni

tzer

199

2, J

ohns

on a

nd S

imon

198

7, J

ohns

on a

nd S

wan

son

2005

, W

ells

200

6),

but

a di

ffer

ent

ecoc

lass

cod

e w

asas

sign

ed f

or e

ach

inst

ance

. P

LA

NT

S c

ode

(US

DA

NR

CS

200

4) i

s de

scri

bed

in t

he s

peci

es l

ist

sect

ion

of t

his

repo

rt.

“P

VT

com

mon

nam

e” p

rovi

des

a co

mm

on n

ame

for

each

pot

enti

al v

eget

atio

n ty

pe;

see

“nam

ing

conv

enti

ons”

sec

tion

for

inf

orm

atio

n ab

out

deri

vati

on o

f P

VT

com

mon

nam

es.

“S

tatu

s” p

rovi

des

the

clas

sifi

cati

on s

tatu

s of

eac

h po

tent

ial

vege

tati

on t

ype:

PA

is

plan

t as

soci

atio

n; P

C i

s pl

ant

com

mun

ity;

PC

T i

s pl

ant

com

mun

ity

type

.

“E

cocl

ass”

cod

es a

re u

sed

to r

ecor

d po

tent

ial

vege

tati

on t

ype

dete

rmin

atio

ns o

n fi

eld

form

s an

d in

com

pute

r da

taba

ses;

see

“na

min

g co

nven

tion

s” s

ecti

on f

or i

nfor

mat

ion

abou

tde

riva

tion

of

ecoc

lass

cod

es.

“PA

G”

(pla

nt a

ssoc

iati

on g

roup

) an

d “P

VG

” (p

oten

tial

veg

etat

ion

grou

p) a

re t

wo

of t

he m

idsc

ale

hier

arch

ical

uni

ts (

fig.

2);

PA

G a

nd P

VG

cod

es u

se t

he f

ollo

win

g ab

brev

iati

ons:

SM

is

soil

moi

stur

e, U

F i

s up

land

for

est

phys

iogn

omic

cla

ss,

UW

is

upla

nd w

oodl

and

phys

iogn

omic

cla

ss,

US

is

upla

nd s

hrub

phy

siog

nom

ic c

lass

, U

H i

s up

land

her

b ph

ysio

g-no

mic

cla

ss,

RF

is

ripa

rian

for

est

phys

iogn

omic

cla

ss,

RS

is

ripa

rian

shr

ub p

hysi

ogno

mic

cla

ss,

and

RH

is

ripa

rian

her

b ph

ysio

gnom

ic c

lass

.

Page 80: Potential Vegetation Hierarchy · boundaries were established by using aquatic rather than terrestrial ecological units (Maxwell et al. 1995, Seaber et al. 1987). Province M332, “middle

76

GENERAL TECHNICAL REPORT PNW-GTR-709

Tabl

e 9–

Pot

enti

al v

eget

atio

n ty

pes

(PV

T)

of t

he B

lue

Mou

ntai

ns s

ecti

on,

orga

nize

d by

eco

clas

s co

dea

Eco

clas

sP

VT

cod

e (P

LA

NT

S co

de)

PV

T c

omm

on n

ame

Sta

tus

PA

GP

VG

CA

F0

AB

LA

-PIA

L/P

OP

U3

suba

lpin

e fi

r-w

hite

bark

pin

e/Ja

cob’

s la

dder

PCC

old

dry

UF

Col

d U

FC

AF

2A

BL

A-P

IAL

/PO

PH

suba

lpin

e fi

r-w

hite

bark

pin

e/al

pine

fle

ecef

low

erP

CT

Col

d dr

y U

FC

old

UF

CA

F32

2P

IAL

/AR

AC

2w

hite

bark

pin

e/pr

ickl

y sa

ndw

ort

PC

TC

old

dry

UF

Col

d U

FC

AF

323

PIA

L/L

UA

R3

whi

teba

rk p

ine/

silv

ery

lupi

nePC

Col

d dr

y U

FC

old

UF

CA

F32

4A

BL

A-P

IAL

/AR

AC

2su

balp

ine

fir-

whi

teba

rk p

ine/

pric

kly

sand

wor

tPC

Col

d dr

y U

FC

old

UF

CA

G11

1A

BL

A/C

AG

E2

suba

lpin

e fi

r/el

k se

dge

PAC

old

dry

UF

Col

d U

FC

AG

131

PIA

L/C

AG

E2

whi

teba

rk p

ine/

elk

sedg

ePA

Col

d dr

y U

FC

old

UF

CA

G13

2A

BL

A-P

IAL

/JU

PA-S

TL

E2

suba

lpin

e fi

r-w

hite

bark

pin

e/P

arry

’s r

ush-

Lem

mon

’s n

eedl

egra

ssPA

Col

d dr

y U

FC

old

UF

CA

G13

3A

BL

A-P

IAL

/CA

GE

2su

balp

ine

fir-

whi

teba

rk p

ine/

elk

sedg

ePA

Col

d dr

y U

FC

old

UF

CA

G22

1P

IAL

/FE

VI

whi

teba

rk p

ine/

gree

n fe

scue

PAC

old

dry

UF

Col

d U

FC

AG

222

AB

LA

-PIA

L/F

EV

Isu

balp

ine

fir-

whi

teba

rk p

ine/

gree

n fe

scue

PAC

old

dry

UF

Col

d U

FC

AG

3A

BL

A-P

IAL

/JU

DR

suba

lpin

e fi

r-w

hite

bark

pin

e/D

rum

mon

d’s

rush

PC

TC

old

dry

UF

Col

d U

FC

AS

311

PIA

L/V

AS

C/L

UH

I4w

hite

bark

pin

e/gr

ouse

huc

kleb

erry

/sm

ooth

woo

drus

hPA

Col

d dr

y U

FC

old

UF

CA

S31

2P

IAL

/VA

SC

/AR

CO

9w

hite

bark

pin

e/gr

ouse

huc

kleb

erry

/hea

rtle

af a

rnic

aPC

Col

d dr

y U

FC

old

UF

CA

S31

3P

IAL

/VA

SC

/AR

AC

2w

hite

bark

pin

e/gr

ouse

huc

kleb

erry

/pri

ckly

san

dwor

tPC

Col

d dr

y U

FC

old

UF

CA

S42

2P

IAL

/JU

CO

6-A

RN

Ew

hite

bark

pin

e/m

ount

ain

juni

per-

pine

mat

man

zani

taPC

Col

d dr

y U

FC

old

UF

CA

S42

3A

BL

A-P

IAL

/JU

CO

6-A

RN

Esu

balp

ine

fir-

whi

teba

rk p

ine/

mou

ntai

n ju

nipe

r-pi

nem

at m

anza

nita

PCC

old

dry

UF

Col

d U

FC

AS

424

AB

LA

-PIA

L/J

UC

O6

suba

lpin

e fi

r-w

hite

bark

pin

e/m

ount

ain

juni

per

PCC

old

dry

UF

Col

d U

FC

AS

511

PIF

L2/

JUC

O6

lim

ber

pine

/mou

ntai

n ju

nipe

rP

CT

Col

d dr

y U

FC

old

UF

CA

S51

2P

IAL

/RIM

O2/

PO

PU

3w

hite

bark

pin

e/m

ount

ain

goos

eber

ry/J

acob

’s l

adde

rPA

Col

d dr

y U

FC

old

UF

CA

S61

1A

BL

A-P

IAL

/RIM

O2/

PO

PU

3su

balp

ine

fir-

whi

teba

rk p

ine/

mou

ntai

n go

oseb

erry

/Jac

ob’s

lad

der

PC

TC

old

dry

UF

Col

d U

FC

AS

621

AB

LA

-PIA

L/V

AS

C/A

RC

O9

suba

lpin

e fi

r-w

hite

bark

pin

e/gr

ouse

huc

kleb

erry

/hea

rtle

af a

rnic

aPA

Col

d dr

y U

FC

old

UF

CA

S62

2A

BL

A-P

IAL

/VA

SC

/CA

RO

5su

balp

ine

fir-

whi

teba

rk p

ine/

grou

se h

uckl

eber

ry/R

oss’

sed

gePA

Col

d dr

y U

FC

old

UF

CA

S62

3A

BL

A-P

IAL

/VA

SC

/AR

AC

2su

balp

ine

fir-

whi

teba

rk p

ine/

grou

se h

uckl

eber

ry/p

rick

ly s

andw

ort

PC

TC

old

dry

UF

Col

d U

FC

AS

624

AB

LA

-PIA

L/V

AS

C-P

HE

Msu

balp

ine

fir-

whi

teba

rk p

ine/

grou

se h

uckl

eber

ry-p

ink

mou

ntai

nhea

thP

CT

Col

d dr

y U

FC

old

UF

CA

S62

5A

BL

A-P

IAL

/VA

SC

/FE

VI

suba

lpin

e fi

r-w

hite

bark

pin

e/gr

ouse

huc

kleb

erry

/gre

en f

escu

ePC

Col

d dr

y U

FC

old

UF

CA

S62

6A

BL

A-P

IAL

/VA

SC

/OR

EX

suba

lpin

e fi

r-w

hite

bark

pin

e/gr

ouse

huc

kleb

erry

/lit

tle

rice

gras

sPC

Col

d dr

y U

FC

old

UF

CA

S62

7A

BL

A-P

IAL

/VA

SC

/LE

CO

W2

suba

lpin

e fi

r-w

hite

bark

pin

e/gr

ouse

huc

kleb

erry

/Wal

low

a L

ewis

iaPC

Col

d dr

y U

FC

old

UF

CA

S62

8A

BL

A-P

IAL

/VA

SC

-PH

EM

(A

VA

LA

NC

HE

)su

balp

ine

fir-

whi

teba

rk p

ine/

grou

se h

uckl

eber

ry-p

ink

mou

ntai

nhea

th (

aval

anch

e)PC

Col

d dr

y U

FC

old

UF

CA

S62

9A

BL

A-P

IAL

/VA

SC

/FE

VI

(AV

AL

AN

CH

E)

suba

lpin

e fi

r-w

hite

bark

pin

e/gr

ouse

huc

kleb

erry

/gre

en f

escu

e (a

vala

nche

)PC

Col

d dr

y U

FC

old

UF

CD

F31

3P

SM

E/T

RC

AD

ougl

as-f

ir/f

alse

bug

bane

PC

TW

arm

mod

erat

e S

M R

FW

arm

RF

CD

G11

1P

SM

E/C

AG

E2

Dou

glas

-fir

/elk

sed

gePA

War

m d

ry U

FD

ry U

FC

DG

112

PS

ME

/CA

RU

Dou

glas

-fir

/pin

egra

ssPA

War

m d

ry U

FD

ry U

FC

DG

121

PS

ME

/CA

RU

Dou

glas

-fir

/pin

egra

ssPA

War

m d

ry U

FD

ry U

FC

DG

333

PS

ME

-PIP

O-J

UO

C/F

EID

Dou

glas

-fir

-pon

dero

sa p

ine-

wes

tern

jun

iper

/Ida

ho f

escu

ePC

War

m d

ry U

FD

ry U

FC

DS

611

PS

ME

/HO

DI

Dou

glas

-fir

/oce

ansp

ray

PAW

arm

moi

st U

FM

oist

UF

CD

S62

2P

SM

E/S

YA

LD

ougl

as-f

ir/c

omm

on s

now

berr

yPA

War

m d

ry U

FD

ry U

FC

DS

623

PS

ME

/SY

OR

2D

ougl

as-f

ir/m

ount

ain

snow

berr

yPA

War

m d

ry U

FD

ry U

FC

DS

624

PS

ME

/SY

AL

Dou

glas

-fir

/com

mon

sno

wbe

rry

PAW

arm

dry

UF

Dry

UF

Page 81: Potential Vegetation Hierarchy · boundaries were established by using aquatic rather than terrestrial ecological units (Maxwell et al. 1995, Seaber et al. 1987). Province M332, “middle

77

Potential Vegetation Hierarchy for the Blue Mountains Section of Northeastern Oregon…

Tab

le 9

–Pot

enti

al v

eget

atio

n ty

pes

(PV

T)

of t

he B

lue

Mou

ntai

ns s

ecti

on,

orga

nize

d by

eco

clas

s co

dea (

cont

inue

d)

Eco

clas

sP

VT

cod

e (P

LA

NT

S co

de)

PV

T c

omm

on n

ame

Sta

tus

PA

GP

VG

CD

S62

5P

SM

E/S

YO

R2

Dou

glas

-fir

/mou

ntai

n sn

owbe

rry

PAW

arm

dry

UF

Dry

UF

CD

S62

8P

SM

E/S

YA

L (

FL

OO

DP

LA

IN)

Dou

glas

-fir

/com

mon

sno

wbe

rry

(flo

odpl

ain)

PAW

arm

low

SM

RF

Low

SM

RF

CD

S63

4P

SM

E/S

PB

E2

Dou

glas

-fir

/bir

chle

af s

pira

eaPA

War

m d

ry U

FD

ry U

FC

DS

642

PS

ME

/SY

OR

2/C

AG

E2

Dou

glas

-fir

/mou

ntai

n sn

owbe

rry/

elk

sedg

ePC

War

m d

ry U

FD

ry U

FC

DS

664

PS

ME

/AR

NE

/CA

GE

2D

ougl

as-f

ir/p

inem

at m

anza

nita

/elk

sed

gePA

War

m d

ry U

FD

ry U

FC

DS

711

PS

ME

/PH

MA

5D

ougl

as-f

ir/m

allo

w n

ineb

ark

PAW

arm

dry

UF

Dry

UF

CD

S72

2P

SM

E/A

CG

L-P

HM

A5

Dou

glas

-fir

/Roc

ky M

ount

ain

map

le-m

allo

w n

ineb

ark

PAW

arm

moi

st U

FM

oist

UF

CD

S72

4P

SM

E/A

CG

L-P

HM

A5

(FL

OO

DP

LA

IN)

Dou

glas

-fir

/Roc

ky M

ount

ain

map

le-m

allo

w n

ineb

ark

(flo

odpl

ain)

PAW

arm

mod

erat

e S

M R

FW

arm

RF

CD

S72

5P

SM

E/A

CG

L-S

YO

R2

Dou

glas

-fir

/Roc

ky M

ount

ain

map

le-m

ount

ain

snow

berr

yPC

War

m m

oist

UF

Moi

st U

FC

DS

812

PS

ME

/VA

ME

Dou

glas

-fir

/big

huc

kleb

erry

PAW

arm

dry

UF

Dry

UF

CD

S82

1P

SM

E/V

AM

ED

ougl

as-f

ir/b

ig h

uckl

eber

ryPA

War

m d

ry U

FD

ry U

FC

DS

911

PS

ME

/RIM

O2/

PO

PU

3D

ougl

as-f

ir/m

ount

ain

goos

eber

ry/J

acob

’s l

adde

rPC

Col

d dr

y U

FC

old

UF

CD

SD

PS

ME

/CE

LE

3/C

AG

E2

Dou

glas

-fir

/mou

ntai

n m

ahog

any/

elk

sedg

eP

CT

War

m d

ry U

FD

ry U

FC

EF

111

AB

LA

/XE

TE

suba

lpin

e fi

r/be

argr

ass

PAC

ool

dry

UF

Col

d U

FC

EF

2A

BL

A-P

IEN

/LIB

O3

suba

lpin

e fi

r-E

ngel

man

n sp

ruce

/tw

infl

ower

PCC

ool

moi

st U

FM

oist

UF

CE

F22

1A

BL

A/L

IBO

3su

balp

ine

fir/

twin

flow

erPA

Coo

l m

oist

UF

Moi

st U

FC

EF

311

AB

LA

/STA

M2

suba

lpin

e fi

r/cl

aspl

eaf

twis

teds

talk

PC

TC

ool

wet

UF

Moi

st U

FC

EF

331

AB

LA

/TR

CA

suba

lpin

e fi

r/fa

lse

bugb

ane

PAC

ool

moi

st U

FM

oist

UF

CE

F33

2A

BL

A/A

TF

Isu

balp

ine

fir/

lady

fern

PAC

old

high

SM

RF

Col

d R

FC

EF

333

AB

LA

/SE

TR

suba

lpin

e fi

r/ar

row

leaf

gro

unds

elPA

Col

d hi

gh S

M R

FC

old

RF

CE

F33

4P

IEN

/AT

FI

Eng

elm

ann

spru

ce/l

adyf

ern

PC

TC

old

high

SM

RF

Col

d R

FC

EF

335

PIE

N/S

ET

RE

ngel

man

n sp

ruce

/arr

owle

af g

roun

dsel

PAC

old

high

SM

RF

Col

d R

FC

EF

336

AB

LA

-PIE

N/S

ET

Rsu

balp

ine

fir-

Eng

elm

ann

spru

ce/a

rrow

leaf

gro

unds

elPC

Col

d m

oist

UF

Col

d U

FC

EF

411

AB

LA

/PO

PU

3su

balp

ine

fir/

Jaco

b’s

ladd

erPA

Col

d dr

y U

FC

old

UF

CE

F41

2A

BL

A/A

RC

O9

suba

lpin

e fi

r/he

artl

eaf

arni

caP

CT

Coo

l m

oist

UF

Moi

st U

FC

EF

425

AB

LA

-PIE

N/T

RC

Asu

balp

ine

fir-

Eng

elm

ann

spru

ce/f

alse

bug

bane

PCC

ool

moi

st U

FM

oist

UF

CE

F42

6A

BL

A-P

IEN

/PO

PU

3su

balp

ine

fir-

Eng

elm

ann

spru

ce/J

acob

’s l

adde

rPC

Col

d dr

y U

FC

old

UF

CE

F43

5A

BL

A/A

RC

O9

suba

lpin

e fi

r/he

artl

eaf

arni

caPA

Coo

l m

oist

UF

Moi

st U

FC

EF

436

AB

LA

-PIE

N/A

RC

O9

suba

lpin

e fi

r-E

ngel

man

n sp

ruce

/hea

rtle

af a

rnic

aPA

Coo

l m

oist

UF

Moi

st U

FC

EF

437

AB

LA

-PIE

N/C

LU

N2

suba

lpin

e fi

r-E

ngel

man

n sp

ruce

/que

encu

p be

adli

lyPA

Coo

l m

oist

UF

Moi

st U

FC

EF

511

AB

LA

/PO

PH

suba

lpin

e fi

r/al

pine

fle

ecef

low

erPC

Col

d dr

y U

FC

old

UF

CE

G13

1A

BL

A-P

IEN

/LU

HI4

suba

lpin

e fi

r-E

ngel

man

n sp

ruce

/sm

ooth

woo

drus

hPC

Col

d dr

y U

FC

old

UF

CE

G20

1P

IEN

-AB

LA

/CA

SC

12E

ngel

man

n sp

ruce

-sub

alpi

ne f

ir/H

olm

’s R

ocky

Mou

ntai

n se

dge

PAC

old

high

SM

RF

Col

d R

FC

EG

312

AB

LA

/CA

RU

suba

lpin

e fi

r/pi

negr

ass

PAC

ool

dry

UF

Col

d U

FC

EG

323

AB

LA

/ST

OC

2su

balp

ine

fir/

wes

tern

nee

dleg

rass

PC

TC

old

dry

UF

Col

d U

FC

EG

411

AB

LA

/FE

VI

suba

lpin

e fi

r/gr

een

fesc

uePC

Col

d dr

y U

FC

old

UF

CE

G41

2A

BL

A/J

UD

Rsu

balp

ine

fir/

Dru

mm

ond’

s ru

shPC

Col

d dr

y U

FC

old

UF

CE

G41

3A

BL

A/J

UT

Esu

balp

ine

fir/

slen

der

rush

PCC

old

dry

UF

Col

d U

FC

EG

414

AB

LA

/JU

PA (

AV

AL

AN

CH

E)

suba

lpin

e fi

r/Pa

rry’

s ru

sh (

aval

anch

e)PC

Col

d dr

y U

FC

old

UF

CE

M12

1P

IEN

/CA

DI6

Eng

elm

ann

spru

ce/s

oftl

eaf

sedg

ePA

Col

d hi

gh S

M R

FC

old

RF

CE

M12

2A

BL

A/C

AD

I6su

balp

ine

fir/

soft

leaf

sed

geP

CT

Col

d hi

gh S

M R

FC

old

RF

CE

M12

3A

BL

A/C

AA

Qsu

balp

ine

fir/

aqua

tic

sedg

eP

CT

Col

d hi

gh S

M R

FC

old

RF

CE

M12

4A

BL

A/C

AC

A4

suba

lpin

e fi

r/bl

uejo

int

reed

gras

sPA

Col

d m

oder

ate

SM

RF

Col

d R

FC

EM

125

PIE

N/B

RV

UE

ngel

man

n sp

ruce

/Col

umbi

a br

ome

PC

TC

old

low

SM

RF

Col

d R

F

Page 82: Potential Vegetation Hierarchy · boundaries were established by using aquatic rather than terrestrial ecological units (Maxwell et al. 1995, Seaber et al. 1987). Province M332, “middle

78

GENERAL TECHNICAL REPORT PNW-GTR-709

Tabl

e 9–

Pot

enti

al v

eget

atio

n ty

pes

(PV

T)

of t

he B

lue

Mou

ntai

ns s

ecti

on,

orga

nize

d by

eco

clas

s co

dea (c

onti

nued

)

Eco

clas

sP

VT

cod

e (P

LA

NT

S co

de)

PV

T c

omm

on n

ame

Sta

tus

PA

GP

VG

CE

M12

6P

IEN

/CIL

A2

Eng

elm

ann

spru

ce/d

roop

ing

woo

dree

dPC

Col

d m

oder

ate

SM

RF

Col

d R

FC

EM

201

PIE

N-A

BL

A/S

ET

RE

ngel

man

n sp

ruce

-sub

alpi

ne f

ir/a

rrow

leaf

gro

unds

elPA

Col

d hi

gh S

M R

FC

old

RF

CE

M21

1P

IEN

/EQ

AR

Eng

elm

ann

spru

ce/c

omm

on h

orse

tail

PAC

old

mod

erat

e S

M R

FC

old

RF

CE

M31

3A

BL

A/V

AU

L/C

AS

C12

suba

lpin

e fi

r/bo

g bl

uebe

rry/

Hol

m’s

Roc

ky M

ount

ain

sedg

eP

CT

Col

d hi

gh S

M R

FC

old

RF

CE

S13

1A

BL

A/C

LU

N2

suba

lpin

e fi

r/qu

eenc

up b

eadl

ily

PAC

ool

moi

st U

FM

oist

UF

CE

S2

AB

LA

-PIE

N/M

EF

Esu

balp

ine

fir-

Eng

elm

ann

spru

ce/r

usty

men

zies

iaPA

Col

d m

oist

UF

Col

d U

FC

ES

214

AB

LA

/RH

AL

2su

balp

ine

fir/

whi

te r

hodo

dend

ron

PC

TC

old

moi

st U

FC

old

UF

CE

S21

5A

BL

A-P

IEN

/RH

AL

2su

balp

ine

fir-

Eng

elm

ann

spru

ce/w

hite

rho

dode

ndro

nPC

Col

d m

oist

UF

Col

d U

FC

ES

221

AB

LA

/ME

FE

suba

lpin

e fi

r/ru

sty

men

zies

iaPA

Col

d m

oist

UF

Col

d U

FC

ES

311

AB

LA

/VA

ME

suba

lpin

e fi

r/bi

g hu

ckle

berr

yPA

Coo

l m

oist

UF

Moi

st U

FC

ES

314

AB

LA

/CL

UN

2su

balp

ine

fir/

quee

ncup

bea

dlil

yPA

Coo

l m

oist

UF

Moi

st U

FC

ES

315

AB

LA

/VA

ME

suba

lpin

e fi

r/bi

g hu

ckle

berr

yPA

Coo

l m

oist

UF

Moi

st U

FC

ES

316

AB

LA

/VA

ME

(F

LO

OD

PL

AIN

)su

balp

ine

fir/

big

huck

lebe

rry

(flo

odpl

ain)

PAC

old

mod

erat

e S

M R

FC

old

RF

CE

S41

1A

BL

A/V

AS

Csu

balp

ine

fir/

grou

se h

uckl

eber

ryPA

Col

d dr

y U

FC

old

UF

CE

S41

4A

BL

A/L

IBO

3su

balp

ine

fir/

twin

flow

erPA

Coo

l m

oist

UF

Moi

st U

FC

ES

415

AB

LA

/VA

SC

/PO

PU

3su

balp

ine

fir/

grou

se h

uckl

eber

ry/J

acob

’s l

adde

rPA

Col

d dr

y U

FC

old

UF

CE

S42

7A

BL

A-P

IEN

/VA

SC

-PH

EM

suba

lpin

e fi

r-E

ngel

man

n sp

ruce

/gro

use

huck

lebe

rry-

pink

mou

ntai

nhea

thPC

Col

d dr

y U

FC

old

UF

CE

S42

8A

BL

A/V

AS

C-P

HE

Msu

balp

ine

fir/

grou

se h

uckl

eber

ry-p

ink

mou

ntai

nhea

thPA

Col

d dr

y U

FC

old

UF

CE

S42

9A

BL

A/A

RN

E/A

RA

C2

suba

lpin

e fi

r/pi

nem

at m

anza

nita

/pri

ckly

san

dwor

tPC

Coo

l dr

y U

FC

old

UF

CE

S51

1P

IEN

/CO

ST

4E

ngel

man

n sp

ruce

/red

osi

er d

ogw

ood

PAC

old

mod

erat

e S

M R

FC

old

RF

CE

S61

0A

BL

A-P

IEN

/LE

GL

(F

LO

OD

PL

AIN

)su

balp

ine

fir-

Eng

elm

ann

spru

ce/L

abra

dor

tea

(flo

odpl

ain)

PAC

old

high

SM

RF

Col

d R

FC

ES

612

AB

LA

-PIE

N/L

EG

Lsu

balp

ine

fir-

Eng

elm

ann

spru

ce/L

abra

dor

tea

PAC

old

moi

st U

FC

old

UF

CE

S71

0A

BL

A-P

IEN

/ME

FE

(F

LO

OD

PL

AIN

)su

balp

ine

fir-

Eng

elm

ann

spru

ce/r

usty

men

zies

ia (

floo

dpla

in)

PAC

old

mod

erat

e S

M R

FC

old

RF

CE

S8

AB

LA

-PIM

O3/

CH

UM

suba

lpin

e fi

r-w

este

rn w

hite

pin

e/pr

ince

’s p

ine

PCC

ool

dry

UF

Col

d U

FC

JC1

JUC

O6

mou

ntai

n ju

nipe

rPC

War

m m

oist

US

Moi

st U

SC

JG11

1JU

OC

/FE

ID-A

GS

Pw

este

rn j

unip

er/I

daho

fes

cue-

blue

bunc

h w

heat

gras

sPA

Hot

moi

st U

WM

oist

UW

CJG

113

JUO

C/A

GS

Pw

este

rn j

unip

er/b

lueb

unch

whe

atgr

ass

PC

TH

ot d

ry U

WD

ry U

WC

JS1

JUO

C/A

RA

R8

wes

tern

jun

iper

/low

sag

ebru

shP

CT

Hot

dry

UW

Dry

UW

CJS

112

JUO

C/A

RA

R8/

FE

IDw

este

rn j

unip

er/l

ow s

ageb

rush

/Ida

ho f

escu

ePA

Hot

dry

UW

Dry

UW

CJS

2JU

OC

/AR

TR

V/F

EID

-AG

SP

wes

tern

jun

iper

/mou

ntai

n bi

g sa

gebr

ush/

Idah

o fe

scue

-blu

ebun

ch w

heat

gras

sP

CT

Hot

moi

st U

WM

oist

UW

CJS

321

JUO

C/P

UT

R2/

FE

ID-A

GS

Pw

este

rn j

unip

er/b

itte

rbru

sh/I

daho

fes

cue-

blue

bunc

h w

heat

gras

sPA

Hot

moi

st U

WM

oist

UW

CJS

41JU

OC

/CE

LE

3/F

EID

-AG

SP

wes

tern

jun

iper

/mou

ntai

n m

ahog

any/

Idah

o fe

scue

-blu

ebun

ch w

heat

gras

sPA

Hot

moi

st U

WM

oist

UW

CJS

42JU

OC

/CE

LE

3/C

AG

E2

wes

tern

jun

iper

/mou

ntai

n m

ahog

any/

elk

sedg

eP

CT

Hot

moi

st U

WM

oist

UW

CJS

5JU

SC

2/C

EL

E3

Roc

ky M

ount

ain

juni

per-

mou

ntai

n m

ahog

any

PCW

arm

dry

UF

Dry

UF

CJS

8JU

OC

/AR

RI2

wes

tern

jun

iper

/sti

ff s

ageb

rush

PC

TH

ot d

ry U

WD

ry U

WC

JS81

1JU

OC

/AR

RI2

(S

CA

B)

wes

tern

jun

iper

/sti

ff s

ageb

rush

(sc

abla

nd)

PC

TH

ot d

ry U

WD

ry U

WC

LF

211

PIC

O(A

BG

R)/

LIB

O3

lodg

epol

e pi

ne(g

rand

fir

)/tw

infl

ower

PC

TC

ool

moi

st U

FM

oist

UF

CL

G11

PIC

O(A

BL

A)/

ST

OC

2lo

dgep

ole

pine

(sub

alpi

ne f

ir)/

wes

tern

nee

dleg

rass

PC

TC

old

dry

UF

Col

d U

FC

LG

21P

ICO

(AB

GR

)/C

AR

Ulo

dgep

ole

pine

(gra

nd f

ir)/

pine

gras

sP

CT

Coo

l dr

y U

FC

old

UF

CL

G32

2P

ICO

(AB

LA

)/C

AG

E2

lodg

epol

e pi

ne(s

ubal

pine

fir

)/el

k se

dge

PC

TC

old

dry

UF

Col

d U

FC

LM

112

PIC

O/P

OP

Rlo

dgep

ole

pine

/Ken

tuck

y bl

uegr

ass

PC

TC

old

low

SM

RF

Col

d R

FC

LM

114

PIC

O/C

AA

Qlo

dgep

ole

pine

/aqu

atic

sed

gePA

Col

d hi

gh S

M R

FC

old

RF

CL

M11

5P

ICO

/DE

CE

lodg

epol

e pi

ne/t

ufte

d ha

irgr

ass

PAC

old

mod

erat

e S

M R

FC

old

RF

CL

M11

6P

ICO

/CA

LA

30lo

dgep

ole

pine

/woo

lly

sedg

ePC

Col

d m

oder

ate

SM

RF

Col

d R

F

Page 83: Potential Vegetation Hierarchy · boundaries were established by using aquatic rather than terrestrial ecological units (Maxwell et al. 1995, Seaber et al. 1987). Province M332, “middle

79

Potential Vegetation Hierarchy for the Blue Mountains Section of Northeastern Oregon…

Tabl

e 9–

Pot

enti

al v

eget

atio

n ty

pes

(PV

T)

of t

he B

lue

Mou

ntai

ns s

ecti

on,

orga

nize

d by

eco

clas

s co

dea (

cont

inue

d)

Eco

clas

sP

VT

cod

e (P

LA

NT

S co

de)

PV

T c

omm

on n

ame

Sta

tus

PA

GP

VG

CL

M11

7P

ICO

/CA

CA

4lo

dgep

ole

pine

/blu

ejoi

nt r

eedg

rass

PCC

old

mod

erat

e S

M R

FC

old

RF

CL

M11

8P

ICO

/CA

SC

12lo

dgep

ole

pine

/Hol

m’s

Roc

ky M

ount

ain

sedg

ePC

Col

d hi

gh S

M R

FC

old

RF

CL

M51

1P

ICO

/AL

IN2/

ME

SIC

FO

RB

lodg

epol

e pi

ne/m

ount

ain

alde

r/m

esic

for

bPC

Col

d m

oder

ate

SM

RF

Col

d R

FC

LS

415

PIC

O(A

BL

A)/

VA

SC

/PO

PU

3lo

dgep

ole

pine

(sub

alpi

ne f

ir)/

grou

se h

uckl

eber

ry/J

acob

’s l

adde

rP

CT

Col

d dr

y U

FC

old

UF

CL

S41

6P

ICO

/CA

RU

lodg

epol

e pi

ne/p

ineg

rass

PAC

ool

dry

UF

Col

d U

FC

LS

417

PIC

O(A

BG

R)/

VA

SC

/CA

RU

lodg

epol

e pi

ne(g

rand

fir

)/gr

ouse

huc

kleb

erry

/pin

egra

ssP

CT

Col

d dr

y U

FC

old

UF

CL

S41

8P

ICO

(AB

LA

)/V

AS

Clo

dgep

ole

pine

(sub

alpi

ne f

ir)/

grou

se h

uckl

eber

ryP

CT

Col

d dr

y U

FC

old

UF

CL

S5

PIC

O(A

BG

R)/

VA

ME

-LIB

O3

lodg

epol

e pi

ne(g

rand

fir

)/bi

g hu

ckle

berr

y/tw

infl

ower

PC

TC

ool

moi

st U

FM

oist

UF

CL

S51

2P

ICO

(AB

GR

)/V

AM

E/C

AR

Ulo

dgep

ole

pine

(gra

nd f

ir)/

big

huck

lebe

rry/

pine

gras

sP

CT

Coo

l m

oist

UF

Moi

st U

FC

LS

513

PIC

O(A

BG

R)/

VA

ME

lodg

epol

e pi

ne(g

rand

fir

)/bi

g hu

ckle

berr

yP

CT

Coo

l m

oist

UF

Moi

st U

FC

LS

514

PIC

O(A

BL

A)/

VA

ME

lodg

epol

e pi

ne(s

ubal

pine

fir

)/bi

g hu

ckle

berr

yP

CT

Coo

l m

oist

UF

Moi

st U

FC

LS

515

PIC

O(A

BL

A)/

VA

ME

lodg

epol

e pi

ne(s

ubal

pine

fir

)/bi

g hu

ckle

berr

yP

CT

Coo

l m

oist

UF

Moi

st U

FC

LS

516

PIC

O(A

BL

A)/

VA

ME

/CA

RU

lodg

epol

e pi

ne(s

ubal

pine

fir

)/bi

g hu

ckle

berr

y/pi

negr

ass

PC

TC

ool

moi

st U

FM

oist

UF

CL

S51

9P

ICO

(AB

GR

)/V

AM

E/P

TAQ

lodg

epol

e pi

ne(g

rand

fir

)/bi

g hu

ckle

berr

y/br

acke

n fe

rnP

CT

Coo

l m

oist

UF

Moi

st U

FC

LS

57P

ICO

(AB

GR

)/A

RN

Elo

dgep

ole

pine

(gra

nd f

ir)/

pine

mat

man

zani

taP

CT

Coo

l dr

y U

FC

old

UF

CL

S58

PIC

O(A

BG

R)/

AL

SI3

lodg

epol

e pi

ne(g

rand

fir

)/S

itka

ald

erP

CT

Coo

l ve

ry m

oist

UF

Moi

st U

FC

MS

131

TS

ME

/VA

SC

mou

ntai

n he

mlo

ck/g

rous

e hu

ckle

berr

yPA

Col

d dr

y U

FC

old

UF

CM

S23

1T

SM

E/V

AM

Em

ount

ain

hem

lock

/big

huc

kleb

erry

PAC

old

dry

UF

Col

d U

FC

PC

212

PIP

O-J

UO

C/C

EL

E3-

SY

OR

2po

nder

osa

pine

-wes

tern

jun

iper

/mou

ntai

n m

ahog

any-

mou

ntai

n sn

owbe

rry

PC

TH

ot d

ry U

FD

ry U

FC

PG

111

PIP

O/A

GS

Ppo

nder

osa

pine

/blu

ebun

ch w

heat

gras

sPA

Hot

dry

UF

Dry

UF

CP

G11

2P

IPO

/FE

IDpo

nder

osa

pine

/Ida

ho f

escu

ePA

Hot

dry

UF

Dry

UF

CP

G13

1P

IPO

/FE

IDpo

nder

osa

pine

/Ida

ho f

escu

ePA

Hot

dry

UF

Dry

UF

CP

G13

2P

IPO

/AG

SP

pond

eros

a pi

ne/b

lueb

unch

whe

atgr

ass

PAH

ot d

ry U

FD

ry U

FC

PG

221

PIP

O/C

AR

Upo

nder

osa

pine

/pin

egra

ssPA

War

m d

ry U

FD

ry U

FC

PG

222

PIP

O/C

AG

E2

pond

eros

a pi

ne/e

lk s

edge

PAW

arm

dry

UF

Dry

UF

CP

M11

2P

IPO

/PO

PR

pond

eros

a pi

ne/K

entu

cky

blue

gras

sP

CT

Hot

low

SM

RF

Low

SM

RF

CP

S13

1P

IPO

/AR

TR

V/F

EID

-AG

SP

pond

eros

a pi

ne/m

ount

ain

big

sage

brus

h/Id

aho

fesc

ue-b

lueb

unch

whe

atgr

ass

PAH

ot d

ry U

FD

ry U

FC

PS

132

PIP

O/A

RT

RV

/CA

GE

2po

nder

osa

pine

/mou

ntai

n bi

g sa

gebr

ush/

elk

sedg

eP

CT

Hot

dry

UF

Dry

UF

CP

S22

1P

IPO

/PU

TR

2/C

AR

O5

pond

eros

a pi

ne/b

itte

rbru

sh/R

oss’

sed

gePA

War

m d

ry U

FD

ry U

FC

PS

222

PIP

O/P

UT

R2/

CA

GE

2po

nder

osa

pine

/bit

terb

rush

/elk

sed

gePA

War

m d

ry U

FD

ry U

FC

PS

226

PIP

O/P

UT

R2/

FE

ID-A

GS

Ppo

nder

osa

pine

/bit

terb

rush

/Ida

ho f

escu

e-bl

uebu

nch

whe

atgr

ass

PAH

ot d

ry U

FD

ry U

FC

PS

229

PIP

O/P

UT

R2/

AG

SP

-PO

SA

12po

nder

osa

pine

/bit

terb

rush

/blu

ebun

ch w

heat

gras

s-S

andb

erg’

s bl

uegr

ass

PAH

ot d

ry U

FD

ry U

FC

PS

231

PIP

O/P

UT

R2/

AG

SP

pond

eros

a pi

ne/b

itte

rbru

sh/b

lueb

unch

whe

atgr

ass

PC

TH

ot d

ry U

FD

ry U

FC

PS

232

PIP

O/C

EL

E3/

CA

GE

2po

nder

osa

pine

/mou

ntai

n m

ahog

any/

elk

sedg

ePA

War

m d

ry U

FD

ry U

FC

PS

233

PIP

O/C

EL

E3/

PO

NE

Wpo

nder

osa

pine

/mou

ntai

n m

ahog

any/

Whe

eler

’s b

lueg

rass

PAH

ot d

ry U

FD

ry U

FC

PS

234

PIP

O/C

EL

E3/

FE

ID-A

GS

Ppo

nder

osa

pine

/mou

ntai

n m

ahog

any/

Idah

o fe

scue

-blu

ebun

ch w

heat

gras

sPA

Hot

dry

UF

Dry

UF

CP

S51

1P

IPO

/SY

AL

(F

LO

OD

PL

AIN

)po

nder

osa

pine

/com

mon

sno

wbe

rry

(flo

odpl

ain)

PAH

ot l

ow S

M R

FL

ow S

M R

FC

PS

522

PIP

O/S

YA

Lpo

nder

osa

pine

/com

mon

sno

wbe

rry

PAW

arm

dry

UF

Dry

UF

CP

S52

3P

IPO

/SP

BE

2po

nder

osa

pine

/bir

chle

af s

pira

eaP

CT

War

m d

ry U

FD

ry U

FC

PS

524

PIP

O/S

YA

Lpo

nder

osa

pine

/com

mon

sno

wbe

rry

PAW

arm

dry

UF

Dry

UF

CP

S52

5P

IPO

/SY

OR

2po

nder

osa

pine

/mou

ntai

n sn

owbe

rry

PAW

arm

dry

UF

Dry

UF

CP

S61

PIP

O/A

RA

R8

pond

eros

a pi

ne/l

ow s

ageb

rush

PC

TH

ot m

oist

UF

Dry

UF

CP

S72

2P

IPO

/CR

DO

2po

nder

osa

pine

/bla

ck h

awth

orn

PCH

ot m

oder

ate

SM

RF

War

m R

FC

PS

8P

IPO

/PE

RA

4po

nder

osa

pine

/squ

aw a

pple

PC

TH

ot d

ry U

FD

ry U

F

Page 84: Potential Vegetation Hierarchy · boundaries were established by using aquatic rather than terrestrial ecological units (Maxwell et al. 1995, Seaber et al. 1987). Province M332, “middle

80

GENERAL TECHNICAL REPORT PNW-GTR-709

Tabl

e 9–

Pot

enti

al v

eget

atio

n ty

pes

(PV

T)

of t

he B

lue

Mou

ntai

ns s

ecti

on,

orga

nize

d by

eco

clas

s co

dea (

cont

inue

d)

Eco

clas

sP

VT

cod

e (P

LA

NT

S co

de)

PV

T c

omm

on n

ame

Sta

tus

PA

GP

VG

CP

S9

PIP

O/R

HG

Lpo

nder

osa

pine

/sm

ooth

sum

acP

CT

Hot

dry

UF

Dry

UF

CQ

M11

1P

IMO

3/D

EC

Ew

este

rn w

hite

pin

e/tu

fted

hai

rgra

ssP

CT

War

m m

oder

ate

SM

RF

War

m R

FC

WC

811

AB

GR

/TA

BR

2/C

LU

N2

gran

d fi

r/Pa

cifi

c ye

w/q

ueen

cup

bead

lily

PAC

ool

wet

UF

Moi

st U

FC

WC

812

AB

GR

/TA

BR

2/L

IBO

3gr

and

fir/

Paci

fic

yew

/tw

infl

ower

PAC

ool

wet

UF

Moi

st U

FC

WF

311

AB

GR

/LIB

O3

gran

d fi

r/tw

infl

ower

PAC

ool

moi

st U

FM

oist

UF

CW

F31

2A

BG

R/L

IBO

3gr

and

fir/

twin

flow

erPA

Coo

l m

oist

UF

Moi

st U

FC

WF

421

AB

GR

/CL

UN

2gr

and

fir/

quee

ncup

bea

dlil

yPA

Coo

l m

oist

UF

Moi

st U

FC

WF

422

AB

GR

/TA

BR

2/C

LU

N2

gran

d fi

r/Pa

cifi

c ye

w/q

ueen

cup

bead

lily

PAC

ool

wet

UF

Moi

st U

FC

WF

424

AB

GR

/TA

BR

2/L

IBO

3 (F

LO

OD

PL

AIN

)gr

and

fir/

Paci

fic

yew

/tw

infl

ower

(fl

oodp

lain

)PA

War

m h

igh

SM

RF

War

m R

FC

WF

444

AB

GR

/AR

CO

9gr

and

fir/

hear

tlea

f ar

nica

PC

TC

old

dry

UF

Col

d U

FC

WF

511

AB

GR

/CO

OC

gran

d fi

r/go

ldth

read

PAC

ool

dry

UF

Col

d U

FC

WF

512

AB

GR

/TR

CA

gran

d fi

r/fa

lse

bugb

ane

PAC

ool

very

moi

st U

FM

oist

UF

CW

F61

1A

BG

R/G

YD

Rgr

and

fir/

oakf

ern

PAC

ool

very

moi

st U

FM

oist

UF

CW

F61

2A

BG

R/P

OM

U-A

SC

A2

gran

d fi

r/sw

ordf

ern-

ging

erPA

Coo

l ve

ry m

oist

UF

Moi

st U

FC

WF

613

AB

GR

/AT

FI

gran

d fi

r/la

dyfe

rnPA

War

m h

igh

SM

RF

War

m R

FC

WG

111

AB

GR

/CA

GE

2gr

and

fir/

elk

sedg

ePA

War

m d

ry U

FD

ry U

FC

WG

112

AB

GR

/CA

RU

gran

d fi

r/pi

negr

ass

PAW

arm

dry

UF

Dry

UF

CW

G11

3A

BG

R/C

AR

Ugr

and

fir/

pine

gras

sPA

War

m d

ry U

FD

ry U

FC

WG

211

AB

GR

/BR

VU

gran

d fi

r/C

olum

bia

brom

ePA

War

m m

oist

UF

Moi

st U

FC

WM

311

AB

GR

/CA

LA

30gr

and

fir/

woo

lly

sedg

ePC

War

m h

igh

SM

RF

War

m R

FC

WS

211

AB

GR

/VA

ME

gran

d fi

r/bi

g hu

ckle

berr

yPA

Coo

l m

oist

UF

Moi

st U

FC

WS

212

AB

GR

/VA

ME

gran

d fi

r/bi

g hu

ckle

berr

yPA

Coo

l m

oist

UF

Moi

st U

FC

WS

232

AB

GR

-CH

NO

/VA

ME

gran

d fi

r-A

lask

a ye

llow

ced

ar/b

ig h

uckl

eber

ryP

CT

Coo

l m

oist

UF

Moi

st U

FC

WS

314

AB

GR

/SY

AL

(F

LO

OD

PL

AIN

)gr

and

fir/

com

mon

sno

wbe

rry

(flo

odpl

ain)

PC

TW

arm

low

SM

RF

Low

SM

RF

CW

S32

1A

BG

R/S

PB

E2

gran

d fi

r/bi

rchl

eaf

spir

aea

PAW

arm

dry

UF

Dry

UF

CW

S32

2A

BG

R/S

PB

E2

gran

d fi

r/bi

rchl

eaf

spir

aea

PAW

arm

dry

UF

Dry

UF

CW

S41

2A

BG

R/A

CG

L-P

HM

A5

gran

d fi

r/R

ocky

Mou

ntai

n m

aple

-mal

low

nin

ebar

kP

CT

War

m m

oist

UF

Moi

st U

FC

WS

423

AB

GR

/CR

DO

2/C

AD

E9

gran

d fi

r/bl

ack

haw

thor

n/D

ewey

’s s

edge

PAW

arm

hig

h S

M R

FW

arm

RF

CW

S54

1A

BG

R/A

CG

Lgr

and

fir/

Roc

ky M

ount

ain

map

lePA

War

m v

ery

moi

st U

FM

oist

UF

CW

S54

3A

BG

R/A

CG

L (

FL

OO

DP

LA

IN)

gran

d fi

r/R

ocky

Mou

ntai

n m

aple

(fl

oodp

lain

)PA

War

m m

oder

ate

SM

RF

War

m R

FC

WS

811

AB

GR

/VA

SCgr

and

fir/

grou

se h

uckl

eber

ryPA

Col

d dr

y U

FC

old

UF

CW

S81

2A

BG

R/V

AS

C-L

IBO

3gr

and

fir/

grou

se h

uckl

eber

ry-t

win

flow

erPA

Coo

l m

oist

UF

Moi

st U

FC

WS

912

AB

GR

/AC

GL

gran

d fi

r/R

ocky

Mou

ntai

n m

aple

PAW

arm

ver

y m

oist

UF

Moi

st U

FF

M91

11E

RD

O-P

OS

A12

Dou

glas

’ bu

ckw

heat

-San

dber

g’s

blue

gras

sP

CT

Hot

dry

UH

Dry

UH

FM

9112

ER

ST

4-P

OS

A12

stri

ct b

uckw

heat

/San

dber

g’s

blue

gras

sP

CT

Hot

dry

UH

Dry

UH

FM

9113

ER

UM

(R

IDG

E)

sulp

hurf

low

er (

ridg

e)P

CT

Hot

dry

UH

Dry

UH

FS

1113

LIN

U4-

CY

TE

Fli

nant

hus-

cym

opte

rus

PCC

ool

dry

UH

Col

d U

HF

S59

12P

OP

H-F

EV

Ial

pine

fle

ecef

low

er-g

reen

fes

cue

PCC

old

moi

st U

HC

old

UH

FS

5913

PO

PH

-CA

RU

-CA

GE

2al

pine

fle

ecef

low

er-p

ineg

rass

-elk

sed

gePC

Coo

l dr

y U

HC

old

UH

FS

5914

PO

PH

-CA

GE

2-L

INU

4al

pine

fle

ecef

low

er-e

lk s

edge

-lin

anth

usPC

Coo

l dr

y U

HC

old

UH

FS

5915

PO

PH

-AG

UR

-LIN

U4

alpi

ne f

leec

eflo

wer

-hor

sem

int-

lina

nthu

sPC

Coo

l dr

y U

HC

old

UH

FS

5916

PO

PH

(C

OR

NIC

ES

)al

pine

fle

ecef

low

er (

corn

ices

)PC

Col

d m

oist

UH

Col

d U

HF

S80

LIN

U4-

AR

LU

lina

nthu

s-w

hite

sag

ebru

shPC

Coo

l dr

y U

HC

old

UH

FS

81R

UO

C2-

MA

GL

2w

este

rn c

onef

low

er-c

lust

er t

arw

eed

PCC

ool

moi

st U

HC

old

UH

Page 85: Potential Vegetation Hierarchy · boundaries were established by using aquatic rather than terrestrial ecological units (Maxwell et al. 1995, Seaber et al. 1987). Province M332, “middle

81

Potential Vegetation Hierarchy for the Blue Mountains Section of Northeastern Oregon…

Tabl

e 9–

Pot

enti

al v

eget

atio

n ty

pes

(PV

T)

of t

he B

lue

Mou

ntai

ns s

ecti

on,

orga

nize

d by

eco

clas

s co

dea (

cont

inue

d)

Eco

clas

sP

VT

cod

e (P

LA

NT

S co

de)

PV

T c

omm

on n

ame

Sta

tus

PA

GP

VG

FS

8101

RU

OC

2w

este

rn c

onef

low

erP

CT

War

m m

oder

ate

SM

RH

War

m R

HF

S81

11P

TAQ

-CA

HO

5br

acke

n fe

rn-H

ood’

s se

dge

PCC

ool

moi

st U

HC

old

UH

FS

8112

MO

OD

mou

ntai

n ba

lmPC

Coo

l dr

y U

HC

old

UH

FS

8113

LE

PY

2-M

AG

L2

pygm

y L

ewis

ia-c

lust

er t

arw

eed

PCC

ool

moi

st U

HC

old

UH

FS

8115

LIN

U4-

AR

LO

6li

nant

hus-

long

leaf

arn

ica

PCC

ool

moi

st U

HC

old

UH

FS

8116

ER

FL

4-P

EC

Ogo

lden

buc

kwhe

at-c

oile

d lo

usew

ort

PCC

ool

dry

UH

Col

d U

HF

S81

17P

HL

OX

-CY

TE

Fph

lox-

cym

opte

ris

PCC

old

dry

UH

Col

d U

HF

S81

18P

HL

OX

-IV

GO

phlo

x-Iv

esia

PCC

old

dry

UH

Col

d U

HF

S90

SC

RE

Esc

ree

PCC

old

dry

UH

Col

d U

HF

S91

RO

CK

OU

TC

RO

Pro

ck o

utcr

opPC

Col

d dr

y U

HC

old

UH

FS

92G

RU

Sgr

usPC

Col

d dr

y U

HC

old

UH

FW

3911

CA

CU

2 (S

EE

P)

Cus

ick’

s ca

mas

(se

ep)

PC

TW

arm

ver

y m

oist

UH

Moi

st U

HF

W42

11S

ET

Rar

row

leaf

gro

unds

elPA

War

m h

igh

SM

RH

War

m R

HF

W42

12E

QA

Rco

mm

on h

orse

tail

PAW

arm

mod

erat

e S

M R

HW

arm

RH

FW

4213

AD

PE

mai

denh

air

fern

PC

TW

arm

hig

h S

M R

HW

arm

RH

FW

4214

SE

TR

-MIL

E2

arro

wle

af g

roun

dsel

-pur

ple

mon

keyf

low

erPA

Coo

l hi

gh S

M R

HC

old

RH

FW

51V

ER

AT

fals

e he

lleb

ore

PC

TW

arm

mod

erat

e S

M R

HW

arm

RH

FW

5121

VE

RA

Tfa

lse

hell

ebor

ePC

War

m m

oder

ate

SM

RH

War

m R

HF

W61

11M

ET

R3

buck

bean

PCW

arm

hig

h S

M R

HW

arm

RH

FW

6112

VE

AM

2A

mer

ican

spe

edw

ell

PAW

arm

hig

h S

M R

HW

arm

RH

FW

6113

SA

AR

13br

ook

saxi

frag

eP

CT

War

m h

igh

SM

RH

War

m R

H[n

one]

ALV

AP

acif

ic o

nion

PC

TC

old

high

SM

RH

Col

d R

HF

W71

11A

LVA

-CA

SC

12P

acif

ic o

nion

-Hol

m’s

Roc

ky M

ount

ain

sedg

ePA

Col

d hi

gh S

M R

HC

old

RH

FX

4111

LE

CO

W2

(RIM

)W

allo

wa

Lew

isia

(ri

m)

PC

TH

ot d

ry U

HD

ry U

HG

B12

11S

PC

R (

TE

RR

AC

E)

sand

dro

psee

d (t

erra

ce)

PAH

ot d

ry U

HD

ry U

HG

B19

11A

GS

P-S

PC

R-A

RL

O3

blue

bunc

h w

heat

gras

s-sa

nd d

rops

eed-

red

thre

eaw

nP

CT

Hot

dry

UH

Dry

UH

GB

41A

GS

P-P

OS

A12

blue

bunc

h w

heat

gras

s-S

andb

erg’

s bl

uegr

ass

PAH

ot d

ry U

HD

ry U

HG

B41

11A

GS

P-E

RH

E2

blue

bunc

h w

heat

gras

s-W

yeth

’s b

uckw

heat

PAH

ot d

ry U

HD

ry U

HG

B41

12A

GS

P-P

OS

A12

-SC

AN

3bl

uebu

nch

whe

atgr

ass-

San

dber

g’s

blue

gras

s-na

rrow

leaf

sku

llca

pPA

Hot

dry

UH

Dry

UH

GB

4113

AG

SP

-PO

SA

12 (

BA

SA

LT)

blue

bunc

h w

heat

gras

s-S

andb

erg’

s bl

uegr

ass

(bas

alt)

PAH

ot d

ry U

HD

ry U

HG

B41

14A

GS

P-P

OS

A12

-AS

CU

5bl

uebu

nch

whe

atgr

ass-

San

dber

g’s

blue

gras

s-C

usic

k’s

mil

kvet

chPA

Hot

dry

UH

Dry

UH

GB

4115

AG

SP

-PO

SA

12-E

RP

U2

blue

bunc

h w

heat

gras

s-S

andb

erg’

s bl

uegr

ass-

shag

gy f

leab

ane

PAH

ot d

ry U

HD

ry U

HG

B41

16A

GS

P-P

OS

A12

(G

RA

NIT

E)

blue

bunc

h w

heat

gras

s-S

andb

erg’

s bl

uegr

ass

(gra

nite

)PA

Hot

dry

UH

Dry

UH

GB

4117

AG

SP

-PO

SA

12-P

HC

O10

blue

bunc

h w

heat

gras

s-S

andb

erg’

s bl

uegr

ass-

Sna

ke R

iver

phl

oxPA

Hot

dry

UH

Dry

UH

GB

4118

AG

SP

-PO

SA

12-O

PP

Obl

uebu

nch

whe

atgr

ass-

San

dber

g’s

blue

gras

s-pr

ickl

ypea

rPA

Hot

dry

UH

Dry

UH

GB

4119

AG

SP

-PO

SA

12-L

UP

INbl

uebu

nch

whe

atgr

ass-

San

dber

g’s

blue

gras

s-lu

pine

PAH

ot d

ry U

HD

ry U

HG

B41

21A

GS

P-P

OS

A12

blue

bunc

h w

heat

gras

s-S

andb

erg’

s bl

uegr

ass

PAH

ot d

ry U

HD

ry U

HG

B41

23A

GS

P-P

OS

A12

-BA

SA

3bl

uebu

nch

whe

atgr

ass-

San

dber

g’s

blue

gras

s-ar

row

leaf

bal

sam

root

PAH

ot d

ry U

HD

ry U

HG

B41

24A

GS

P-P

OS

A12

-ER

HE

2bl

uebu

nch

whe

atgr

ass-

San

dber

g’s

blue

gras

s-cr

eam

y bu

ckw

heat

PAH

ot d

ry U

HD

ry U

HG

B41

25A

GS

P-P

OS

A12

-AS

RE

5bl

uebu

nch

whe

atgr

ass-

San

dber

g’s

blue

gras

s-B

lue

Mou

ntai

n m

ilkv

etch

PAH

ot d

ry U

HD

ry U

HG

B41

26A

GS

P-P

OS

A12

-TR

MA

3bl

uebu

nch

whe

atgr

ass-

San

dber

g’s

blue

gras

s-bi

ghea

d cl

over

PAH

ot d

ry U

HD

ry U

HG

B41

27A

GS

P-P

OS

A12

-APA

N2

blue

bunc

h w

heat

gras

s-S

andb

erg’

s bl

uegr

ass-

spre

adin

g do

gban

ePA

Hot

dry

UH

Dry

UH

GB

4131

AG

SP

-BR

CA

5bl

uebu

nch

whe

atgr

ass-

mou

ntai

n br

ome

PC

TW

arm

moi

st U

HM

oist

UH

GB

4132

AG

SP

-ER

UM

blue

bunc

h w

heat

gras

s-su

lphu

rflo

wer

buc

kwhe

atP

CT

Hot

dry

UH

Dry

UH

GB

4133

AG

SP

-CY

TE

Fbl

uebu

nch

whe

atgr

ass-

turp

enti

ne c

ymop

teru

sP

CT

Hot

dry

UH

Dry

UH

Page 86: Potential Vegetation Hierarchy · boundaries were established by using aquatic rather than terrestrial ecological units (Maxwell et al. 1995, Seaber et al. 1987). Province M332, “middle

82

GENERAL TECHNICAL REPORT PNW-GTR-709

Tabl

e 9–

Pot

enti

al v

eget

atio

n ty

pes

(PV

T)

of t

he B

lue

Mou

ntai

ns s

ecti

on,

orga

nize

d by

eco

clas

s co

dea (c

onti

nued

)

Eco

clas

sP

VT

cod

e (P

LA

NT

S co

de)

PV

T c

omm

on n

ame

Sta

tus

PA

GP

VG

GB

4411

PO

BU

-MA

GL

2bu

lbou

s bl

uegr

ass-

clus

ter

tarw

eed

PC

TH

ot d

ry U

HD

ry U

HG

B49

11A

GS

P-P

OS

A12

-DA

UN

blue

bunc

h w

heat

gras

s-S

andb

erg’

s bl

uegr

ass-

ones

pike

oat

gras

sPA

Hot

dry

UH

Dry

UH

GB

4915

BE

RE

/AG

SP

-APA

N2

cree

ping

Ore

gong

rape

/blu

ebun

ch w

heat

gras

s-sp

read

ing

dogb

ane

PC

TW

arm

dry

US

Dry

US

GB

5011

ME

BU

-ST

OC

2on

iong

rass

-wes

tern

nee

dleg

rass

PC

TW

arm

dry

UH

Dry

UH

GB

5121

SY

AL

/FE

ID-A

GS

P-L

US

E4

com

mon

sno

wbe

rry/

Idah

o fe

scue

-blu

ebun

ch w

heat

gras

s-si

lky

lupi

neP

CT

War

m m

oist

US

Moi

st U

SG

B59

FE

ID-A

GS

PId

aho

fesc

ue-b

lueb

unch

whe

atgr

ass

PAW

arm

moi

st U

HM

oist

UH

GB

5911

FE

ID-K

OC

R (

RID

GE

)Id

aho

fesc

ue-p

rair

ie j

uneg

rass

(ri

dge)

PAC

ool

moi

st U

HC

old

UH

GB

5912

FE

ID-K

OC

R (

MO

UN

D)

Idah

o fe

scue

-pra

irie

jun

egra

ss (

mou

nd)

PAC

ool

moi

st U

HC

old

UH

GB

5913

FE

ID-K

OC

R (

HIG

H)

Idah

o fe

scue

-pra

irie

jun

egra

ss (

high

ele

vati

on)

PAC

ool

moi

st U

HC

old

UH

GB

5914

FE

ID-K

OC

R (

LO

W)

Idah

o fe

scue

-pra

irie

jun

egra

ss (

low

ele

vati

on)

PAW

arm

moi

st U

HM

oist

UH

GB

5915

FE

ID-A

GS

P (

RID

GE

)Id

aho

fesc

ue-b

lueb

unch

whe

atgr

ass

(rid

ge)

PC

TW

arm

moi

st U

HM

oist

UH

GB

5916

FE

ID-A

GS

P-L

UP

INId

aho

fesc

ue-b

lueb

unch

whe

atgr

ass-

lupi

nePA

War

m m

oist

UH

Moi

st U

HG

B59

17F

EID

-AG

SP

-BA

SA

3Id

aho

fesc

ue-b

lueb

unch

whe

atgr

ass-

arro

wle

af b

alsa

mro

otPA

War

m m

oist

UH

Moi

st U

HG

B59

18F

EID

-AG

SP

-PH

CO

10Id

aho

fesc

ue-b

lueb

unch

whe

atgr

ass-

Sna

ke R

iver

phl

oxPA

War

m m

oist

UH

Moi

st U

HG

B59

19S

YA

L/F

EID

-KO

CR

com

mon

sno

wbe

rry/

Idah

o fe

scue

-pra

irie

jun

egra

ssP

CT

War

m m

oist

US

Moi

st U

SG

B59

20F

EID

-DA

IN-C

AP

E7

Idah

o fe

scue

-tim

ber

oatg

rass

-Lid

don’

s se

dge

PAW

arm

ver

y m

oist

UH

Moi

st U

HG

B59

21F

EID

-CA

HO

5Id

aho

fesc

ue-H

ood’

s se

dge

PAW

arm

moi

st U

HM

oist

UH

GB

5922

FE

ID-C

AG

E2

Idah

o fe

scue

-elk

sed

geP

CT

War

m m

oist

UH

Moi

st U

HG

B59

23F

EID

-GE

TR

Idah

o fe

scue

-red

ave

nsP

CT

Coo

l m

oist

UH

Col

d U

HG

B59

24F

EID

-PE

SP

2Id

aho

fesc

ue-W

allo

wa

pens

tem

onP

CT

Coo

l m

oist

UH

Col

d U

HG

B59

25F

EID

-AG

SP

-CY

TE

FId

aho

fesc

ue-b

lueb

unch

whe

atgr

ass-

cym

opte

rus

PAW

arm

dry

UH

Dry

UH

GB

5926

FE

ID-A

GS

P-F

RA

LC

2Id

aho

fesc

ue-b

lueb

unch

whe

atgr

ass-

Cus

ick’

s fr

aser

aPA

Coo

l m

oist

UH

Col

d U

HG

B59

27F

EID

-AG

SP

-PO

NE

WId

aho

fesc

ue-b

lueb

unch

whe

atgr

ass-

Whe

eler

’s b

lueg

rass

PCW

arm

dry

UH

Dry

UH

GB

5931

FE

ID-A

GS

P-P

HL

OX

Idah

o fe

scue

-blu

ebun

ch w

heat

gras

s-ph

lox

PAW

arm

moi

st U

HM

oist

UH

GB

5932

FE

ID-D

AU

NId

aho

Fes

cue-

ones

pike

oat

gras

sP

CT

War

m d

ry U

HD

ry U

HG

B60

11F

ES

C-F

EID

roug

h fe

scue

-Ida

ho f

escu

ePC

Col

d dr

y U

HC

old

UH

GB

7111

EL

CI2

basi

n w

ildr

yeP

CT

Hot

ver

y m

oist

UH

Moi

st U

HG

B91

11P

OS

A12

-DA

UN

San

dber

g’s

blue

gras

s-on

espi

ke o

atgr

ass

PAH

ot d

ry U

HD

ry U

HG

B91

12P

OS

A12

-SE

LA

San

dber

g’s

blue

gras

s-la

ncel

eaf

ston

ecro

pPC

War

m d

ry U

HD

ry U

HG

B91

14D

AU

N-L

OL

E2

ones

pike

oat

gras

s-sl

ende

rfru

it l

omat

ium

PAH

ot m

oist

UH

Moi

st U

HG

M4

11

1C

AC

A4

blue

join

t re

edgr

ass

PAC

ool

mod

erat

e S

M R

HC

old

RH

GS

10S

TO

C2

wes

tern

nee

dleg

rass

PC

TC

ool

moi

st U

HC

old

UH

GS

11F

EV

Igr

een

fesc

uePA

Col

d m

oist

UH

Col

d U

HG

S11

11F

EV

I-C

AH

O5

gree

n fe

scue

-Hoo

d’s

sedg

eP

CT

Col

d m

oist

UH

Col

d U

HG

S11

12F

EV

I-L

UL

A3

gree

n fe

scue

-spu

rred

lup

ine

PAC

old

moi

st U

HC

old

UH

GS

1113

FE

VI-

JUPA

gree

n fe

scue

-Par

ry’s

rus

hPA

Col

d dr

y U

HC

old

UH

GS

1114

FE

VI-

CA

RO

5gr

een

fesc

ue-R

oss’

sed

geP

CT

Col

d m

oist

UH

Col

d U

HG

S11

15F

EV

I-P

EN

ST

gree

n fe

scue

-pen

stem

onP

CT

Col

d m

oist

UH

Col

d U

HG

S11

16F

EV

I-S

TO

C2

gree

n fe

scue

-wes

tern

nee

dleg

rass

PC

TC

old

moi

st U

HC

old

UH

GS

1117

FE

VI-

LIC

A2

gree

n fe

scue

-Can

by’s

lov

age

PCC

old

moi

st U

HC

old

UH

GS

1118

FE

VI-

AG

CA

2gr

een

fesc

ue-b

eard

ed w

heat

gras

sPC

Col

d m

oist

UH

Col

d U

HG

S11

19F

EV

I-C

AS

C12

gree

n fe

scue

-Hol

m’s

Roc

ky M

ount

ain

sedg

ePC

Col

d m

oist

UH

Col

d U

HG

S12

FE

ID (

AL

PIN

E)

Idah

o fe

scue

(al

pine

)P

CT

Col

d m

oist

UH

Col

d U

HG

S39

12C

AG

E2-

FE

IDel

k se

dge-

Idah

o fe

scue

PCC

old

dry

UH

Col

d U

H

Page 87: Potential Vegetation Hierarchy · boundaries were established by using aquatic rather than terrestrial ecological units (Maxwell et al. 1995, Seaber et al. 1987). Province M332, “middle

83

Potential Vegetation Hierarchy for the Blue Mountains Section of Northeastern Oregon…

Tabl

e 9–

Pot

enti

al v

eget

atio

n ty

pes

(PV

T)

of t

he B

lue

Mou

ntai

ns s

ecti

on,

orga

nize

d by

eco

clas

s co

dea (c

onti

nued

)

Eco

clas

sP

VT

cod

e (P

LA

NT

S co

de)

PV

T c

omm

on n

ame

Sta

tus

PA

GP

VG

GS

3913

CA

GE

2-JU

PAel

k se

dge-

Parr

y’s

rush

PCC

old

dry

UH

Col

d U

HG

S39

14C

AG

E2-

CA

RU

elk

sedg

e-pi

negr

ass

PCC

old

dry

UH

Col

d U

HG

S39

15C

AG

E2-

PO

CU

3el

k se

dge-

Cus

ick’

s bl

uegr

ass

PCC

old

dry

UH

Col

d U

HG

S39

16C

AG

E2-

PH

AU

3el

k se

dge-

dese

rt p

hlox

PCC

old

dry

UH

Col

d U

HG

S39

17C

AG

E2-

ST

OC

2el

k se

dge-

wes

tern

nee

dleg

rass

PCC

old

dry

UH

Col

d U

HG

S40

11C

AR

EX

-ST

OC

2al

pine

sed

ges-

wes

tern

nee

dleg

rass

PCC

old

dry

UH

Col

d U

HG

S40

12C

AH

O5-

BR

CA

5 (M

EA

DO

W)

Hoo

d’s

sedg

e-m

ount

ain

brom

e (m

eado

w)

PCC

ool

moi

st U

HC

old

UH

GS

4013

JUPA

-AG

GL

Par

ry’s

rus

h-pa

le a

gose

ris

PCC

old

dry

UH

Col

d U

HG

S50

ST

OC

2-S

IHY

(A

LP

INE

)w

este

rn n

eedl

egra

ss-s

quir

relt

ail

(alp

ine)

PC

TW

arm

dry

UH

Dry

UH

GS

60F

EL

LF

IEL

Dfe

llfi

eld

PCC

old

dry

UH

Col

d U

HG

S61

CA

HO

5-B

RC

A5

Hoo

d’s

sedg

e-m

ount

ain

brom

ePC

Coo

l m

oist

UH

Col

d U

HG

S62

CA

HO

5-C

AG

E2

Hoo

d’s

sedg

e-el

k se

dge

PCC

ool

moi

st U

HC

old

UH

GS

63C

AH

O5-

PO

GL

9H

ood’

s se

dge-

stic

ky c

inqu

efoi

lPC

Coo

l dr

y U

HC

old

UH

GS

64C

AH

O5

Hoo

d’s

sedg

eP

CT

Coo

l m

oist

UH

Col

d U

HG

S70

TU

RF

turf

PCC

old

dry

UH

Col

d U

HH

AF

211

AL

RU

2/P

EF

RP

red

alde

r/sw

eet

colt

sfoo

tP

CT

War

m m

oder

ate

SM

RF

War

m R

FH

AF

226

AL

RU

2 (A

LL

UV

IAL

BA

R)

red

alde

r (a

lluv

ial

bar)

PC

TW

arm

mod

erat

e S

M R

FW

arm

RF

HA

F22

7A

LR

U2/

AT

FI

red

alde

r/la

dyfe

rnP

CT

War

m h

igh

SM

RF

War

m R

FH

AS

211

AL

RU

2/P

HC

A11

red

alde

r/Pa

cifi

c ni

neba

rkPA

War

m m

oder

ate

SM

RF

War

m R

F[n

one]

AL

RU

2/S

YA

Lre

d al

der/

com

mon

sno

wbe

rry

PC

TW

arm

mod

erat

e S

M R

FW

arm

RF

HA

S31

2A

LR

U2/

SY

AL

/CA

DE

9re

d al

der/

com

mon

sno

wbe

rry/

Dew

ey’s

sed

geP

CT

War

m m

oder

ate

SM

RF

War

m R

FH

AS

511

AL

RU

2/C

OS

T4

red

alde

r/re

d os

ier

dogw

ood

PCW

arm

mod

erat

e S

M R

FW

arm

RF

HC

S11

2P

OT

R15

/SA

LA

5bl

ack

cott

onw

ood/

Paci

fic

wil

low

PAH

ot m

oder

ate

SM

RF

War

m R

FH

CS

113

PO

TR

15/A

LIN

2-C

OS

T4

blac

k co

tton

woo

d/m

ount

ain

alde

r-re

d os

ier

dogw

ood

PAW

arm

mod

erat

e S

M R

FW

arm

RF

HC

S11

4P

OT

R15

/AC

GL

blac

k co

tton

woo

d/R

ocky

Mou

ntai

n m

aple

PC

TW

arm

mod

erat

e S

M R

FW

arm

RF

HC

S31

1P

OT

R15

/SY

AL

blac

k co

tton

woo

d/co

mm

on s

now

berr

yP

CT

Hot

mod

erat

e S

M R

FW

arm

RF

HC

S31

2P

OT

R15

/SY

AL

blac

k co

tton

woo

d/co

mm

on s

now

berr

yP

CT

Hot

mod

erat

e S

M R

FW

arm

RF

HD

01A

CG

LR

ocky

Mou

ntai

n m

aple

PC

TH

ot l

ow S

M R

SL

ow S

M R

SH

QG

112

PO

TR

5/C

AG

E2

quak

ing

aspe

n/el

k se

dge

PCC

ool

very

moi

st U

FM

oist

UF

HQ

M12

2P

OT

R5/

PO

PR

quak

ing

aspe

n/K

entu

cky

blue

gras

sP

CT

Hot

low

SM

RF

Low

SM

RF

HQ

M12

3P

OT

R5/

CA

CA

4qu

akin

g as

pen/

blue

join

t re

edgr

ass

PC

TW

arm

mod

erat

e S

M R

FW

arm

RF

HQ

M21

1P

OT

R5/

CA

LA

30qu

akin

g as

pen/

woo

lly

sedg

ePA

War

m m

oder

ate

SM

RF

War

m R

FH

QM

212

PO

TR

5/C

AA

Qqu

akin

g as

pen/

aqua

tic

sedg

eP

CT

War

m h

igh

SM

RF

War

m R

FH

QM

511

PO

TR

5/M

ES

IC F

OR

Bqu

akin

g as

pen/

mes

ic f

orb

PC

TW

arm

mod

erat

e S

M R

FW

arm

RF

HQ

S22

1P

OT

R5/

SY

AL

quak

ing

aspe

n/co

mm

on s

now

berr

yP

CT

Hot

mod

erat

e S

M R

FW

arm

RF

HQ

S22

2P

OT

R5/

AL

IN2-

CO

ST

4qu

akin

g as

pen/

mou

ntai

n al

der-

red

osie

r do

gwoo

dP

CT

War

m m

oder

ate

SM

RF

War

m R

FH

QS

223

PO

TR

5/A

LIN

2-S

YA

Lqu

akin

g as

pen/

mou

ntai

n al

der-

com

mon

sno

wbe

rry

PC

TW

arm

mod

erat

e S

M R

FW

arm

RF

MD

21

11

AL

PR

3m

eado

w f

oxta

ilP

CT

War

m l

ow S

M R

HL

ow S

M R

HM

D3

11

1P

OP

R (

DR

Y M

EA

DO

W)

Ken

tuck

y bl

uegr

ass

(dry

mea

dow

)P

CT

War

m l

ow S

M R

HL

ow S

M R

HM

D3

11

2P

OP

R (

DE

GE

N B

EN

CH

)K

entu

cky

blue

gras

s (d

egen

erat

ed b

ench

)P

CT

Coo

l m

oist

UH

Col

d U

HM

D4

11

1A

GD

Ith

in b

entg

rass

PC

TW

arm

low

SM

RH

Low

SM

RH

MM

19

12

DE

CE

tuft

ed h

airg

rass

PAC

ool

mod

erat

e S

M R

HC

old

RH

MM

29

11

CA

LA

30w

ooll

y se

dge

PAW

arm

mod

erat

e S

M R

HW

arm

RH

MM

29

12

CA

NE

2N

ebra

ska

sedg

eP

CT

War

m m

oder

ate

SM

RH

War

m R

HM

M2

91

3C

AE

U2

wid

efru

it s

edge

PAC

old

high

SM

RH

Col

d R

H

Page 88: Potential Vegetation Hierarchy · boundaries were established by using aquatic rather than terrestrial ecological units (Maxwell et al. 1995, Seaber et al. 1987). Province M332, “middle

84

GENERAL TECHNICAL REPORT PNW-GTR-709

Tabl

e 9–

Pot

enti

al v

eget

atio

n ty

pes

(PV

T)

of t

he B

lue

Mou

ntai

ns s

ecti

on,

orga

nize

d by

eco

clas

s co

dea (

cont

inue

d)

Eco

clas

sP

VT

cod

e (P

LA

NT

S co

de)

PV

T c

omm

on n

ame

Sta

tus

PA

GP

VG

MM

29

14

CA

AQ

aqua

tic

sedg

ePA

Coo

l hi

gh S

M R

HC

old

RH

MM

29

15

CA

SI2

shor

tbea

ked

sedg

eP

CT

War

m h

igh

SM

RH

War

m R

HM

M2

91

6C

AL

U7

woo

drus

h se

dge

PAC

old

high

SM

RH

Col

d R

HM

M2

91

7C

AU

Tbl

adde

r se

dge

PAC

ool

high

SM

RH

Col

d R

HM

M2

91

8C

AC

U5

Cus

ick’

s se

dge

PAW

arm

hig

h S

M R

HW

arm

RH

MM

29

19

CA

LE

8la

kesh

ore

sedg

ePA

War

m m

oder

ate

SM

RH

War

m R

HM

M2

92

0C

AL

A11

slen

der

sedg

ePA

War

m h

igh

SM

RH

War

m R

HM

M2

92

1C

AA

M10

bigl

eaf

sedg

ePA

War

m h

igh

SM

RH

War

m R

HM

M2

92

2C

AN

U5

torr

ent

sedg

eP

CT

Hot

hig

h S

M R

HW

arm

RH

MM

29

24

SC

MI2

smal

lfru

it b

ulru

shPA

War

m h

igh

SM

RH

War

m R

HM

M2

92

5G

LE

Lta

ll m

anna

gras

sPA

War

m h

igh

SM

RH

War

m R

HM

M2

92

6P

UPA

3w

eak

alka

ligr

ass

PAW

arm

hig

h S

M R

HW

arm

RH

MM

29

27

CA

LE

9S

ierr

a ha

re s

edge

PAC

old

high

SM

RH

Col

d R

HM

M2

92

8C

AL

I7m

ud s

edge

PAC

old

high

SM

RH

Col

d R

HM

M2

92

9C

AM

I7sm

allw

ing

sedg

eP

CT

War

m m

oder

ate

SM

RH

War

m R

HM

M2

93

0C

AS

U6

brow

n se

dge

PCW

arm

mod

erat

e S

M R

HW

arm

RH

MM

29

32

CA

SH

She

ldon

’s s

edge

PC

TH

ot m

oder

ate

SM

RH

War

m R

HM

M2

93

3C

AJO

Jone

s’ s

edge

PCW

arm

mod

erat

e S

M R

HW

arm

RH

MS

2111

CA

NI2

blac

k al

pine

sed

gePA

Col

d m

oder

ate

SM

RH

Col

d R

HM

S21

13C

AS

C10

-SA

AR

13no

rthe

rn s

ingl

espi

ke s

edge

-bro

ok s

axif

rage

PAC

old

high

SM

RH

Col

d R

HM

S31

11C

AS

C12

Hol

m’s

Roc

ky M

ount

ain

Sed

gePA

Col

d hi

gh S

M R

HC

old

RH

MS

3112

CA

MU

7st

ar s

edge

PC

TW

arm

mod

erat

e S

M R

HW

arm

RH

MS

3113

CA

CA

11si

lver

y se

dge

PC

TW

arm

mod

erat

e S

M R

HW

arm

RH

MS

4111

EL

BE

deli

cate

spi

keru

shPC

Col

d hi

gh S

M R

HC

old

RH

MT

10

NU

PO

2R

ocky

Mou

ntai

n po

ndli

lyPA

Coo

l hi

gh S

M R

HC

old

RH

MT

81

21

TY

LA

com

mon

cat

tail

PCH

ot h

igh

SM

RH

War

m R

HM

W19

23C

AV

E6

infl

ated

sed

gePA

Coo

l hi

gh S

M R

HC

old

RH

MW

1926

CA

ST

5sa

wbe

ak s

edge

PC

TW

arm

hig

h S

M R

HW

arm

RH

MW

2912

CA

PR

5cl

uste

red

fiel

d se

dge

PC

TC

old

high

SM

RH

Col

d R

HM

W29

13C

AL

A13

smoo

thst

emm

ed s

edge

PCC

old

high

SM

RH

Col

d R

HM

W29

27C

ILA

2dr

oopi

ng w

oodr

eed

PCC

old

high

SM

RH

Col

d R

HM

W39

12JU

BA

Bal

tic

rush

PC

TW

arm

mod

erat

e S

M R

HW

arm

RH

MW

4911

EL

PA6

few

flow

ered

spi

keru

shPA

Col

d hi

gh S

M R

HC

old

RH

MW

4912

EL

PA3

cree

ping

spi

keru

shPA

Hot

hig

h S

M R

HW

arm

RH

NT

S11

1P

HL

E4

(TA

LU

S)

syri

nga-

bord

ered

tal

us s

trip

sP

CT

Hot

ver

y m

oist

US

Moi

st U

SS

D01

AR

LU

whi

te s

ageb

rush

PC

TW

arm

low

SM

RH

Low

SM

RH

SD

1911

AR

AR

8/F

EID

-AG

SP

low

sag

ebru

sh/I

daho

fes

cue-

blue

bunc

h w

heat

gras

sPA

War

m m

oist

US

Moi

st U

SS

D19

24A

RA

R8/

AG

SP

low

sag

ebru

sh/b

lueb

unch

whe

atgr

ass

PAW

arm

dry

US

Dry

US

SD

2401

AR

TR

4/P

OS

A12

-DA

UN

thre

etip

sag

ebru

sh/S

andb

erg’

s bl

uegr

ass-

ones

pike

oat

gras

sP

CT

War

m d

ry U

SD

ry U

SS

D29

11A

RT

RV

/FE

ID-A

GS

Pm

ount

ain

big

sage

brus

h/Id

aho

fesc

ue-b

lueb

unch

whe

atgr

ass

PAW

arm

moi

st U

SM

oist

US

SD

2915

AR

TR

V/C

AG

E2

(MO

NTA

NE

)m

ount

ain

big

sage

brus

h/el

k se

dge

(mon

tane

)P

CT

War

m m

oist

US

Moi

st U

SS

D29

16A

RT

RV

-PU

TR

2/F

EID

mou

ntai

n bi

g sa

gebr

ush-

bitt

erbr

ush/

Idah

o fe

scue

PC

TH

ot m

oist

US

Moi

st U

SS

D29

17A

RT

RV

-SY

OR

2/B

RC

A5

mou

ntai

n bi

g sa

gebr

ush-

mou

ntai

n sn

owbe

rry/

mou

ntai

n br

ome

PC

TW

arm

moi

st U

SM

oist

US

SD

2918

AR

TR

V/A

GS

P-P

OS

A12

mou

ntai

n bi

g sa

gebr

ush/

blue

bunc

h w

heat

gras

s-S

andb

erg’

s bl

uegr

ass

PAW

arm

dry

US

Dry

US

Page 89: Potential Vegetation Hierarchy · boundaries were established by using aquatic rather than terrestrial ecological units (Maxwell et al. 1995, Seaber et al. 1987). Province M332, “middle

85

Potential Vegetation Hierarchy for the Blue Mountains Section of Northeastern Oregon…

Tabl

e 9–

Pot

enti

al v

eget

atio

n ty

pes

(PV

T)

of t

he B

lue

Mou

ntai

ns s

ecti

on,

orga

nize

d by

eco

clas

s co

dea (

cont

inue

xd)

Eco

clas

sP

VT

cod

e (P

LA

NT

S co

de)

PV

T c

omm

on n

ame

Sta

tus

PA

GP

VG

SD

2919

AR

TR

V-S

YO

R2

mou

ntai

n bi

g sa

gebr

ush-

mou

ntai

n sn

owbe

rry

PC

TW

arm

moi

st U

SM

oist

US

SD

2920

AR

TR

V/S

TO

C2

mou

ntai

n bi

g sa

gebr

ush/

wes

tern

nee

dleg

rass

PCC

ool

dry

US

Col

d U

SS

D29

29A

RT

RV

/FE

ID-K

OC

Rm

ount

ain

big

sage

brus

h/Id

aho

fesc

ue-p

rair

ie j

uneg

rass

PAW

arm

moi

st U

SM

oist

US

SD

30P

ER

A4-

SY

OR

2sq

uaw

app

le-m

ount

ain

snow

berr

yP

CT

Hot

moi

st U

SM

oist

US

SD

3010

AR

TR

V-P

ER

A4

mou

ntai

n bi

g sa

gebr

ush-

squa

w a

pple

PC

TW

arm

moi

st U

SM

oist

US

SD

3011

AR

TR

V/E

LC

I2m

ount

ain

big

sage

brus

h/ba

sin

wil

drye

PC

TW

arm

moi

st U

SM

oist

US

SD

3111

PU

TR

2/F

EID

-AG

SP

bitt

erbr

ush/

Idah

o fe

scue

-blu

ebun

ch w

heat

gras

sPA

War

m m

oist

US

Moi

st U

SS

D31

12P

UT

R2/

AG

SP

bitt

erbr

ush/

blue

bunc

h w

heat

gras

sPA

Hot

moi

st U

SM

oist

US

SD

3124

PU

TR

2-A

RT

RV

/FE

ID-A

GS

Pbi

tter

brus

h-m

ount

ain

big

sage

brus

h/Id

aho

fesc

ue-b

lueb

unch

whe

atgr

ass

PAW

arm

moi

st U

SM

oist

US

SD

3125

PU

TR

2-A

RT

RV

/FE

IDbi

tter

brus

h-m

ount

ain

big

sage

brus

h/Id

aho

fesc

ueP

CT

War

m m

oist

US

Moi

st U

SS

D31

26P

UT

R2/

ER

DO

bitt

erbr

ush/

Dou

glas

’ bu

ckw

heat

PC

TW

arm

dry

US

Dry

US

SD

40C

EL

E3/

CA

GE

2m

ount

ain

mah

ogan

y/el

k se

dge

PCW

arm

moi

st U

SM

oist

US

SD

4111

CE

LE

3/F

EID

-AG

SP

mou

ntai

n m

ahog

any/

Idah

o fe

scue

-blu

ebun

ch w

heat

gras

sPA

War

m m

oist

US

Moi

st U

SS

D41

12C

EL

E3/

AG

SP

mou

ntai

n m

ahog

any/

blue

bunc

h w

heat

gras

sP

CT

War

m d

ry U

SD

ry U

SS

D41

13C

EL

E3/

CA

GE

2m

ount

ain

mah

ogan

y/el

k se

dge

PCW

arm

moi

st U

SM

oist

US

SD

4114

CE

LE

3/P

ON

EW

mou

ntai

n m

ahog

any/

Whe

eler

’s b

lueg

rass

PC

TW

arm

dry

US

Dry

US

SD

4115

CE

LE

3-P

UT

R2/

AG

SP

mou

ntai

n m

ahog

any-

bitt

erbr

ush/

blue

bunc

h w

heat

gras

sP

CT

War

m m

oist

US

Moi

st U

SS

D49

CE

LE

3m

ount

ain

mah

ogan

yP

CT

War

m d

ry U

SD

ry U

SS

D56

11C

ER

E2/

AG

SP

netl

eaf

hack

berr

y/bl

uebu

nch

whe

atgr

ass

PAH

ot m

oist

US

Moi

st U

SS

D56

12C

ER

E2/

BR

OM

Une

tlea

f ha

ckbe

rry/

brom

eP

CT

Hot

low

SM

RS

Low

SM

RS

SD

6121

RH

GL

/AG

SP

smoo

th s

umac

/blu

ebun

ch w

heat

gras

sPA

Hot

dry

US

Dry

US

SD

65G

LS

PA/A

GS

Psp

iny

grea

sebu

sh/b

lueb

unch

whe

atgr

ass

PAH

ot d

ry U

SD

ry U

SS

D91

11A

RR

I2/P

OS

A12

(S

CA

B)

stif

f sa

gebr

ush/

San

dber

g’s

blue

gras

s (s

cabl

and)

PAW

arm

dry

US

Dry

US

SD

9141

AR

RI2

/PE

GA

stif

f sa

gebr

ush/

Gai

rdne

r’s

pens

tem

onP

CT

War

m d

ry U

SD

ry U

SS

D92

21A

RA

R8/

PO

SA

12lo

w s

ageb

rush

/San

dber

g’s

blue

gras

sPA

War

m d

ry U

SD

ry U

SS

D93

22E

RIO

G-P

HO

R2

buck

whe

at/O

rego

n bl

adde

rpod

PAH

ot d

ry U

HD

ry U

HS

M11

11P

HM

A5-

SY

AL

mal

low

nin

ebar

k-co

mm

on s

now

berr

yP

CT

War

m m

oist

US

Moi

st U

SS

M19

PH

MA

5-S

YA

Lm

allo

w n

ineb

ark-

com

mon

sno

wbe

rry

PC

TW

arm

moi

st U

SM

oist

US

SM

1901

PH

CA

11P

acif

ic n

ineb

ark

PCW

arm

low

SM

RS

Low

SM

RS

SM

20A

LS

I3al

der

snow

sli

des

PC

TC

old

very

moi

st U

SC

old

US

SM

3001

PH

LE

4/M

ES

IC F

OR

BL

ewis

’ m

ocko

rang

e/m

esic

for

bP

CT

Hot

low

SM

RS

Low

SM

RS

SM

31S

YA

Lco

mm

on s

now

berr

yP

CT

War

m m

oist

US

Moi

st U

SS

M31

10S

YA

L (

FL

OO

DP

LA

IN)

com

mon

sno

wbe

rry

(flo

odpl

ain)

PC

TH

ot m

oder

ate

SM

RS

War

m R

SS

M31

11S

YA

L-R

OS

A5

com

mon

sno

wbe

rry-

rose

PC

TW

arm

moi

st U

SM

oist

US

SM

32S

YO

R2

mou

ntai

n sn

owbe

rry

PC

TW

arm

moi

st U

SM

oist

US

SM

33C

EV

Esn

owbr

ush

cean

othu

sP

CT

War

m m

oist

US

Moi

st U

SS

M34

PR

EM

bitt

er c

herr

yPC

War

m m

oist

US

Moi

st U

SS

M41

BE

OC

2/P

HA

R3

wat

er b

irch

/ree

d ca

nary

gras

sPC

War

m m

oder

ate

SM

RS

War

m R

SS

M50

01R

UB

AB

arto

n’s

rasp

berr

yPC

Hot

low

SM

RS

Low

SM

RS

SM

5002

RU

DI2

Him

alay

an b

lack

berr

yPC

Hot

mod

erat

e S

M R

SW

arm

RS

SM

5912

RU

PAth

imbl

eber

ryP

CT

Hot

mod

erat

e S

M R

SW

arm

RS

SS

1912

PH

EM

(M

OU

ND

S)

pink

mou

ntai

nhea

th (

mou

nds)

PAC

old

mod

erat

e S

M R

SC

old

RS

SS

4911

AR

TR

V/C

AG

E2

mou

ntai

n bi

g sa

gebr

ush/

elk

sedg

ePA

Col

d m

oist

US

Col

d U

SS

S49

14A

RT

RV

/BR

CA

5m

ount

ain

big

sage

brus

h/m

ount

ain

brom

eP

CT

War

m m

oist

US

Moi

st U

S

Page 90: Potential Vegetation Hierarchy · boundaries were established by using aquatic rather than terrestrial ecological units (Maxwell et al. 1995, Seaber et al. 1987). Province M332, “middle

86

GENERAL TECHNICAL REPORT PNW-GTR-709

Tabl

e 9–

Pot

enti

al v

eget

atio

n ty

pes

(PV

T)

of t

he B

lue

Mou

ntai

ns s

ecti

on,

orga

nize

d by

eco

clas

s co

dea (c

onti

nued

)

Eco

clas

sP

VT

cod

e (P

LA

NT

S co

de)

PV

T c

omm

on n

ame

Sta

tus

PA

GP

VG

SS

4915

AR

TR

V/F

EV

Im

ount

ain

big

sage

brus

h/gr

een

fesc

ueP

CT

Col

d m

oist

US

Col

d U

SS

S49

16A

RT

RV

/CA

HO

5m

ount

ain

big

sage

brus

h/H

ood’

s se

dge

PC

TC

old

moi

st U

SC

old

US

SS

4917

AR

TR

V/L

INU

4m

ount

ain

big

sage

brus

h/li

nant

hus

PC

TC

ool

dry

US

Col

d U

SS

S49

18A

RT

RV

/ER

FL

4-P

HL

OX

mou

ntai

n bi

g sa

gebr

ush/

gold

en b

uckw

heat

-phl

oxPC

Coo

l dr

y U

SC

old

US

SS

4919

PO

FR

4/F

EID

shru

bby

cinq

uefo

il/I

daho

fes

cue

PC

TW

arm

moi

st U

SM

oist

US

SS

60P

OF

R4

shru

bby

cinq

uefo

ilPC

Coo

l m

oist

US

Col

d U

SS

S60

01P

OF

R4-

BE

GL

shru

bby

cinq

uefo

il-b

og b

irch

PC

TC

old

mod

erat

e S

M R

SC

old

RS

SW

0101

LE

GL

/CA

SC

12L

abra

dor

tea/

Hol

m’s

Roc

ky M

ount

ain

sedg

ePC

Col

d m

oder

ate

SM

RS

Col

d R

SS

W01

02L

OIN

5/A

TF

Itw

inbe

rry

hone

ysuc

kle/

lady

fern

PCW

arm

mod

erat

e S

M R

SW

arm

RS

SW

1111

SA

LIX

/PO

PR

wil

low

/Ken

tuck

y bl

uegr

ass

PC

TW

arm

low

SM

RS

Low

SM

RS

SW

1112

SA

LIX

/CA

LA

30w

illo

w/w

ooll

y se

dge

PAW

arm

mod

erat

e S

M R

SW

arm

RS

SW

1114

SA

LIX

/CA

AQ

wil

low

/aqu

atic

sed

gePA

Coo

l hi

gh S

M R

SC

old

RS

SW

1117

SA

EX

coyo

te w

illo

wPA

War

m m

oder

ate

SM

RS

War

m R

SS

W11

21S

AC

O2/

CA

SC

12un

derg

reen

wil

low

/Hol

m’s

Roc

ky M

ount

ain

sedg

ePA

Col

d hi

gh S

M R

SC

old

RS

SW

1123

SA

LIX

/CA

UT

wil

low

/bla

dder

sed

gePA

War

m h

igh

SM

RS

War

m R

SS

W11

24S

AL

IX/C

AC

A4

wil

low

/blu

ejoi

nt r

eedg

rass

PAC

ool

mod

erat

e S

M R

SC

old

RS

SW

1125

SA

LIX

/ME

SIC

FO

RB

wil

low

/mes

ic f

orb

PC

TW

arm

mod

erat

e S

M R

SW

arm

RS

SW

1126

SA

RI2

rigi

d w

illo

wP

CT

Hot

mod

erat

e S

M R

SW

arm

RS

SW

1127

SA

CO

2/C

AU

Tun

derg

reen

wil

low

/bla

dder

sed

geP

CT

Col

d hi

gh S

M R

SC

old

RS

SW

1128

SA

CO

2/C

AP

R5

unde

rgre

en w

illo

w/c

lust

ered

fie

ld s

edge

PCC

old

high

SM

RS

Col

d R

SS

W11

29S

AE

A-S

AT

W/C

AA

QE

astw

ood

wil

low

-Tw

eedy

wil

low

/aqu

atic

sed

gePC

War

m h

igh

SM

RS

War

m R

SS

W11

30S

AS

C/E

LG

LS

coul

er’s

wil

low

/blu

e w

ildr

yePC

War

m l

ow S

M R

SL

ow S

M R

SS

W11

33S

AA

R27

arct

ic w

illo

wPA

Col

d hi

gh S

M R

SC

old

RS

SW

1134

SA

FA/A

LVA

Farr

’s w

illo

w/P

acif

ic o

nion

PCC

old

high

SM

RS

Col

d R

SS

W11

35S

AL

E/M

ES

IC F

OR

BL

emm

on’s

wil

low

/mes

ic f

orb

PC

TW

arm

mod

erat

e S

M R

SW

arm

RS

SW

1136

SA

SI2

/EQ

AR

Sit

ka w

illo

w/c

omm

on h

orse

tail

PCW

arm

hig

h S

M R

SW

arm

RS

SW

1137

SA

DR

/SE

TR

Dru

mm

ond’

s w

illo

w/a

rrow

leaf

gro

unds

elPC

Col

d hi

gh S

M R

SC

old

RS

SW

1138

SA

BO

2/C

AS

C12

Boo

th’s

wil

low

/Hol

m’s

Roc

ky M

ount

ain

sedg

ePA

Col

d hi

gh S

M R

SC

old

RS

SW

1139

SA

BO

2/C

AV

E6

Boo

th’s

wil

low

/inf

late

d se

dge

PCC

old

high

SM

RS

Col

d R

SS

W21

01A

LR

H2/

RU

BU

Sw

hite

ald

er/b

lack

berr

yP

CT

Hot

mod

erat

e S

M R

FW

arm

RF

SW

2102

AL

RH

2/M

ES

IC S

HR

UB

whi

te a

lder

/mes

ic s

hrub

PC

TH

ot m

oder

ate

SM

RF

War

m R

FS

W21

11A

LS

I3/A

TF

IS

itka

ald

er/l

adyf

ern

PAW

arm

hig

h S

M R

SW

arm

RS

SW

2112

AL

SI3

/CIL

A2

Sit

ka a

lder

/dro

opin

g w

oodr

eed

PAW

arm

hig

h S

M R

SW

arm

RS

SW

2113

AL

SI3

/ME

SIC

FO

RB

Sit

ka a

lder

/mes

ic f

orb

PC

TW

arm

mod

erat

e S

M R

SW

arm

RS

SW

2114

AL

IN2/

CA

AM

10m

ount

ain

alde

r/bi

glea

f se

dge

PAW

arm

hig

h S

M R

SW

arm

RS

SW

2115

AL

IN2/

CA

UT

mou

ntai

n al

der/

blad

der

sedg

ePA

War

m h

igh

SM

RS

War

m R

SS

W21

16A

LIN

2/A

TF

Im

ount

ain

alde

r/la

dyfe

rnPA

War

m h

igh

SM

RS

War

m R

SS

W21

17A

LIN

2/E

QA

Rm

ount

ain

alde

r/co

mm

on h

orse

tail

PAW

arm

mod

erat

e S

M R

SW

arm

RS

SW

2118

AL

IN2/

CA

DE

9m

ount

ain

alde

r/D

ewey

’s s

edge

PC

TW

arm

mod

erat

e S

M R

SW

arm

RS

SW

2120

AL

IN2/

PO

PR

mou

ntai

n al

der/

Ken

tuck

y bl

uegr

ass

PC

TW

arm

low

SM

RS

Low

SM

RS

SW

2121

AL

IN2/

CA

CA

4m

ount

ain

alde

r/bl

uejo

int

reed

gras

sPA

War

m m

oder

ate

SM

RS

War

m R

SS

W21

22A

LIN

2/S

CM

I2m

ount

ain

alde

r/sm

allf

ruit

bul

rush

PC

TW

arm

hig

h S

M R

SW

arm

RS

SW

2123

AL

IN2/

CA

LA

30m

ount

ain

alde

r/w

ooll

y se

dge

PAW

arm

mod

erat

e S

M R

SW

arm

RS

SW

2124

AL

IN2/

HE

LA

4m

ount

ain

alde

r/co

mm

on c

owpa

rsni

pP

CT

War

m m

oder

ate

SM

RS

War

m R

S

Page 91: Potential Vegetation Hierarchy · boundaries were established by using aquatic rather than terrestrial ecological units (Maxwell et al. 1995, Seaber et al. 1987). Province M332, “middle

87

Potential Vegetation Hierarchy for the Blue Mountains Section of Northeastern Oregon…

Tabl

e 9–

Pot

enti

al v

eget

atio

n ty

pes

(PV

T)

of t

he B

lue

Mou

ntai

ns s

ecti

on,

orga

nize

d by

eco

clas

s co

dea (c

onti

nued

)

Eco

clas

sP

VT

cod

e (P

LA

NT

S co

de)

PV

T c

omm

on n

ame

Sta

tus

PA

GP

VG

SW

2125

AL

IN2/

GY

DR

mou

ntai

n al

der/

oakf

ern

PC

TW

arm

mod

erat

e S

M R

SW

arm

RS

SW

2126

AL

IN2/

CA

AQ

mou

ntai

n al

der/

aqua

tic

sedg

ePC

War

m h

igh

SM

RS

War

m R

SS

W21

27A

LIN

2/C

AL

EL

mou

ntai

n al

der/

dens

ely

tuft

ed s

edge

PCW

arm

mod

erat

e S

M R

SW

arm

RS

SW

2128

AL

IN2/

CA

LU

7m

ount

ain

alde

r/w

oodr

ush

sedg

ePC

War

m l

ow S

M R

SL

ow S

M R

SS

W22

11A

LIN

2-S

YA

Lm

ount

ain

alde

r-co

mm

on s

now

berr

yPA

War

m l

ow S

M R

SL

ow S

M R

SS

W22

15A

LIN

2/G

LE

Lm

ount

ain

alde

r/ta

ll m

anna

gras

sPA

War

m h

igh

SM

RS

War

m R

SS

W22

16A

LIN

2-C

OS

T4/

ME

SIC

FO

RB

mou

ntai

n al

der-

red

osie

r do

gwoo

d/m

esic

for

bPA

War

m m

oder

ate

SM

RS

War

m R

SS

W22

17A

LIN

2-R

IBE

S/M

ES

IC F

OR

Bm

ount

ain

alde

r-cu

rran

ts/m

esic

for

bPA

War

m m

oder

ate

SM

RS

War

m R

SS

W31

11C

RD

O2/

ME

SIC

FO

RB

blac

k ha

wth

orn/

mes

ic f

orb

PC

TH

ot l

ow S

M R

SL

ow S

M R

SS

W31

12B

EO

C2/

ME

SIC

FO

RB

wat

er b

irch

/mes

ic f

orb

PC

TW

arm

mod

erat

e S

M R

SW

arm

RS

SW

3113

BE

OC

2/W

ET

SE

DG

Ew

ater

bir

ch/w

et s

edge

PC

TW

arm

hig

h S

M R

SW

arm

RS

SW

3114

AM

AL

2w

este

rn s

ervi

cebe

rry

PC

TH

ot l

ow S

M R

SL

ow S

M R

SS

W31

24H

EL

A4-

EL

GL

com

mon

cow

pars

nip/

blue

wil

drye

PCW

arm

mod

erat

e S

M R

HW

arm

RH

SW

4133

CO

ST

4/A

TF

Ire

d os

ier

dogw

ood/

lady

fern

PAW

arm

hig

h S

M R

SW

arm

RS

SW

5111

RIB

ES

/CIL

A2

curr

ants

/dro

opin

g w

oodr

eed

PC

TW

arm

hig

h S

M R

SW

arm

RS

SW

5112

CO

ST

4re

d os

ier

dogw

ood

PAW

arm

mod

erat

e S

M R

SW

arm

RS

SW

5113

PO

FR

4/D

EC

Esh

rubb

y ci

nque

foil

/tuf

ted

hair

gras

sPA

War

m m

oder

ate

SM

RS

War

m R

SS

W51

14P

OF

R4/

PO

PR

shru

bby

cinq

uefo

il/K

entu

cky

blue

gras

sP

CT

War

m l

ow S

M R

SL

ow S

M R

SS

W51

15R

IBE

S/M

ES

IC F

OR

Bcu

rran

ts/m

esic

for

bP

CT

War

m m

oder

ate

SM

RS

War

m R

SS

W51

16R

IBE

S/G

LE

Lcu

rran

ts/t

all

man

nagr

ass

PC

TW

arm

hig

h S

M R

SW

arm

RS

SW

5117

RH

AL

/ME

SIC

FO

RB

alde

rlea

f bu

ckth

orn/

mes

ic f

orb

PC

TW

arm

mod

erat

e S

M R

SW

arm

RS

SW

5118

CO

ST

4/S

AA

R13

red

osie

r do

gwoo

d/br

ook

saxi

frag

eP

CT

War

m h

igh

SM

RS

War

m R

SS

W61

11A

RC

A13

/DE

CE

silv

er s

ageb

rush

/tuf

ted

hair

gras

sPA

Hot

mod

erat

e S

M R

SW

arm

RS

SW

6112

AR

CA

13/P

OP

Rsi

lver

sag

ebru

sh/K

entu

cky

blue

gras

sP

CT

Hot

low

SM

RS

Low

SM

RS

SW

6113

AR

TR

V/P

OC

U3

mou

ntai

n bi

g sa

gebr

ush/

Cus

ick’

s bl

uegr

ass

PAH

ot l

ow S

M R

SL

ow S

M R

SS

W61

14A

RC

A13

/PO

CU

3si

lver

sag

ebru

sh/C

usic

k’s

blue

gras

sP

CT

Hot

low

SM

RS

Low

SM

RS

SW

901

KA

MI/

CA

NI2

alpi

ne l

aure

l/bl

ack

alpi

ne s

edge

PAC

old

high

SM

RS

Col

d R

SW

L01

08S

PAN

2na

rrow

leaf

bur

-ree

dPA

Col

d hi

gh S

M R

HC

old

RH

a Thi

s ta

bula

r su

mm

ary

is o

rgan

ized

alp

habe

tica

lly

by e

cocl

ass

code

(U

SD

A F

ores

t S

ervi

ce 2

002)

. C

olum

n de

scri

ptio

ns a

re t

he s

ame

as f

or a

ppen

dix

tabl

e 8.

PAG

= p

lant

ass

ocia

tion

gro

up,

PV

G =

pot

enti

al v

eget

atio

n gr

oup.

Page 92: Potential Vegetation Hierarchy · boundaries were established by using aquatic rather than terrestrial ecological units (Maxwell et al. 1995, Seaber et al. 1987). Province M332, “middle

This Page Left Blank Intentionally

Page 93: Potential Vegetation Hierarchy · boundaries were established by using aquatic rather than terrestrial ecological units (Maxwell et al. 1995, Seaber et al. 1987). Province M332, “middle

This Page Left Blank Intentionally

Page 94: Potential Vegetation Hierarchy · boundaries were established by using aquatic rather than terrestrial ecological units (Maxwell et al. 1995, Seaber et al. 1987). Province M332, “middle

This Page Left Blank Intentionally

Page 95: Potential Vegetation Hierarchy · boundaries were established by using aquatic rather than terrestrial ecological units (Maxwell et al. 1995, Seaber et al. 1987). Province M332, “middle

Pacific Northwest Research Station

Web site http://www.fs.fed.us/pnwTelephone (503) 808-2592Publication requests (503) 808-2138FAX (503) 808-2130E-mail [email protected] address Publications Distribution

Pacific Northwest Research StationP.O. Box 3890Portland, OR 97208-3890

Page 96: Potential Vegetation Hierarchy · boundaries were established by using aquatic rather than terrestrial ecological units (Maxwell et al. 1995, Seaber et al. 1987). Province M332, “middle

U.S. Department of AgriculturePacific Northwest Research Station333 S.W. First AvenueP.O. Box 3890Portland, OR 97208-3890

Official BusinessPenalty for Private Use, $300