11
Popular Support and EU Climate Policy Mats Braun – Metropolitan University Prague, [email protected]

Popular Support and EU Climate Policy Mats Braun – Metropolitan University Prague, [email protected]

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Popular Support and EU Climate Policy Mats Braun – Metropolitan University Prague, mats.braun@mup.cz

Popular Support and EU Climate Policy

Mats Braun – Metropolitan University Prague, [email protected]

Page 2: Popular Support and EU Climate Policy Mats Braun – Metropolitan University Prague, mats.braun@mup.cz

Share of respondents stating climate change as their main environmental worry (Eurobarometer)

2003: 39 percent

2007: 57 percent

2011: 34 percent

The single most serious problem facing the world:

2011: 20 percent

2013: 16 percent

Page 3: Popular Support and EU Climate Policy Mats Braun – Metropolitan University Prague, mats.braun@mup.cz

The Climate and Energy Package 2008/09

Internal climate change policies for period after 2012

Targets: 20/20 by 2020- Revision of the Emission Trading Directive- Effort sharing decision, national targets for

non ETS sectors- Binding national targets for renewable energy

sources- Directive on carbon capture

Page 4: Popular Support and EU Climate Policy Mats Braun – Metropolitan University Prague, mats.braun@mup.cz

Why the Climate and Energy Package in 2008?

The role of the European Commission- Increased concern in the Commission

about its popular support – end of the permissive consensus

- The failure of the Treaty Establishing a Constitution for Europe (2005)

- United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change

Page 5: Popular Support and EU Climate Policy Mats Braun – Metropolitan University Prague, mats.braun@mup.cz

Was the role of supranational institutions strengthened?

- In the ETS – an EU wide emission cap (21%) replaced National Allocation Plans, enhancing the role of the EC

- Preferences with the commission for market based solutions, i.e. the ETS

- Renewable energy – turn form non-binding to binding national targets

Page 6: Popular Support and EU Climate Policy Mats Braun – Metropolitan University Prague, mats.braun@mup.cz
Page 7: Popular Support and EU Climate Policy Mats Braun – Metropolitan University Prague, mats.braun@mup.cz

Possible outcomes of Europeanization according to Claudio Radaelli (2003)Inertia

Absorption

Transformation

Retrenchment

Page 8: Popular Support and EU Climate Policy Mats Braun – Metropolitan University Prague, mats.braun@mup.cz

How come agreement possible in 2008?

Rhetorical Entrapment

Unwillingness to go against the interests of France and Germany

Several Compromises made - Binding commitments on renewable challenged and watered down

The Central and East European member states at the time still ‘new’

Page 9: Popular Support and EU Climate Policy Mats Braun – Metropolitan University Prague, mats.braun@mup.cz

2030 EU Climate and Energy Policy Framework (October 2014)40% emission reduction target by 2030

ETS 43% reduction and non-ETS sectors 30% by 2030, relative to 2005

Renewable energy target, at least 27%, but binding only on EU level

Non binding energy efficiency target of 27%

15% electricity interconnections target

Page 10: Popular Support and EU Climate Policy Mats Braun – Metropolitan University Prague, mats.braun@mup.cz

Differentiated integration and its limitations

- Renewable energy targets – ‘New Governance System’

- State aid guidelines of the EC- The role of the European Council,

reinstalling the veto right?

Page 11: Popular Support and EU Climate Policy Mats Braun – Metropolitan University Prague, mats.braun@mup.cz

Thank you for your attention

Contact:[email protected]