Upload
oeae
View
222
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/3/2019 Plan of Assessment of Student Learning (2011-2012) Literatura Comparada
1/12
Assessment Coordinator: Dra. Marian Polhill Department Chair: Dr. Rubn Ros Date submitted:Nov. 28
UNIVERSITY OF PUERTO RICORO PIEDRAS CAMPUS
PLAN OF ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING
PART ICAMPUSMISSION DOMAINS
Academic Program or Major: Comparative Literature Academi
CampusMission Domains
Student Learning ObjectivesActivities and
instruments used tocollect information
EvaluationCriteria
ExpectedOutcomes
Instances to collect informationFirst timeFirst yearBachelors
Degree
Second timeAt midtermBachelors
Degree
Third timeAt the end ofthe Bachelors
Degree
Effective Oral
Communication
Students will demonstrateeffective oral communication
in all of their in-class oralpresentations, taking into
account the following:The student will be able to
1) Communicate effectively,
coherently and correctly inSpanish and in English inoral contexts.
2) Formulate anddemonstrate hypotheses
through textual analysis and
effective use of relevant
sources in the field, such asprofessional journals,
specialized books, archives,
systems and technologies of
information.3) Analyze texts, taking into
account technical, formal,historical and thematic
Activities:a) Oral
Presentation of aCritical Essay
(summary andcommentary)
b) Oral
Presentation ofFinal ResearchProject
Instruments:
a) Rubric to assess
effective oral
communication inoral presentations
will be used to
assess student oral
communicationskills in an oral
presentation of acritical essay and
The criteria to beevaluated, as
expressed in therubric, are the
following:1) Communicate the
presentations main
argument effectively.2) Communicatecontent effectively on
a more general level,throughout the
presentation.
3) Organize ideas and
arguments effectivelyin the presentation.
4) Utilize various
types of materials
(audio, visual, etc.) toenhance performance.
5) Capture and holdthe audiences
75% or more of thestudents will receive a
score of 4 or higher (in a 6point rubric) in all criteria
LITE 3011or other
preliminary3--- level
course
LITE 3045Introduction
to Compara-tive
Literature
or
LITE 3101or LITE
3102
or
LITE 4---Course of
directed
selection
with arequired
finalresearch
LITE 4---Course of
directedselection
with arequired
final
researchpaper(in which
the studentswrite their
final thesis
papers)
8/3/2019 Plan of Assessment of Student Learning (2011-2012) Literatura Comparada
2/12
Assessment Coordinator: Dra. Marian Polhill Department Chair: Dr. Rubn Ros Date submitted:Nov. 28
CampusMission Domains
Student Learning ObjectivesActivities and
instruments used tocollect information
EvaluationCriteria
ExpectedOutcomes
Instances to collect informationFirst timeFirst yearBachelors
Degree
Second timeAt midtermBachelors
Degree
Third timeAt the end ofthe Bachelors
Degree
aspects. in the oral
presentation of thefinal research
paper.
attention through
quality of voice, eyecontact, questions,
interaction, and/or byother means.
6) Demonstrateeffective and
appropriate use oflanguage.
paper
EffectiveWritten
Communication
The students will
demonstrate effective writtencommunication (in Spanish
or English) in all of their
written work, taking into
account the following:
The student will be able to1) Communicate effectively,
coherently and correctly in
Spanish and in English inwritten contexts.
2) Formulate anddemonstrate hypotheses
through textual analysis andeffective use of relevant
sources in the field, such asprofessional journals,
specialized books, archives,systems and technologies of
information.3) Analyze texts, taking into
Activities:
a) PreliminaryResearch Paper
Proposals
b) Final Research
Papers
Instruments:
a) Rubric to assess
effectivecommunication in
analytical writingwill be used to
assess studentwriting skills in
the preliminaryresearch paper
proposal and in thefinal research
paper.
The criteria to be
evaluated, asexpressed in the
rubric, are the
following:
1) Communicate
effectively the mainargument (the thesis
statement) to be
developed in theresearch paper.
2) Communicateeffectively, throughout
the research paper, thearguments that support
the thesis statement.3) Communicate ideas
through the effectiveuse of language.
4) Demonstrate anacademic and accurate
75% or more of the
students will receive ascore of 4 or higher (in a 6
point rubric) in all criteria
LITE 3011
or otherpreliminary
3--- level
course
LITE 3045
Introductionto Compara-
tive
Literature
or
LITE 3101
or LITE3102
or
LITE 4---
Course ofdirected
selectionwith a
requiredfinal
LITE 4---
Course ofdirected
selection
with a
required
finalresearch
paper
(in whichthe students
write theirfinal thesis
papers)
8/3/2019 Plan of Assessment of Student Learning (2011-2012) Literatura Comparada
3/12
Assessment Coordinator: Dra. Marian Polhill Department Chair: Dr. Rubn Ros Date submitted:Nov. 28
CampusMission Domains
Student Learning ObjectivesActivities and
instruments used tocollect information
EvaluationCriteria
ExpectedOutcomes
Instances to collect informationFirst timeFirst yearBachelors
Degree
Second timeAt midtermBachelors
Degree
Third timeAt the end ofthe Bachelors
Degree
account technical, formal,
historical and thematicaspects.
4) Utilize correctly theconventional format relevant
to the discipline for thedocumentation of
bibliographical sources (i.e.MLA format).
use of language.
5) Demonstrate anaccurate and
appropriate use ofvocabulary.
6) Communicateeffectively through the
accurate use ofgrammar.
7) Communicate wellthrough the effective
organization, format,and presentation of the
arguments.8) Utilize correctly the
conventional format
relevant to thediscipline for thedocumentation of
bibliographicalsources (i.e. MLA
format).
research
paper
Critical Thinking
The student will be able to
1) Analyze texts, taking intoaccount technical, formal,
historical and thematicaspects.
2) Formulate anddemonstrate hypotheses
through textual analysis andeffective use of relevant
Activities:
a) FinalExam/Paper
Instruments:
a) Rubric to assesscritical thinking
will be used toassess student
The criteria to be
evaluated, asexpressed in the
rubric, are thefollowing:
1) Formulate anappropriate hypothesis
(the problem, questionor main argument to
75% or more of the
students will receive ascore of 4 or higher (in a 6
point rubric) in all criteria
LITE 3011
or otherpreliminary
3--- levelcourse
LITE 3101
(LiteraryTheory)
or LITE3102
or LITE
3045
LITE 4---
Course ofdirected
selectionwith a
requiredfinal
researchpaper
8/3/2019 Plan of Assessment of Student Learning (2011-2012) Literatura Comparada
4/12
Assessment Coordinator: Dra. Marian Polhill Department Chair: Dr. Rubn Ros Date submitted:Nov. 28
CampusMission Domains
Student Learning ObjectivesActivities and
instruments used tocollect information
EvaluationCriteria
ExpectedOutcomes
Instances to collect informationFirst timeFirst yearBachelors
Degree
Second timeAt midtermBachelors
Degree
Third timeAt the end ofthe Bachelors
Degree
sources in the field, such as
professional journals,specialized books, archives,
systems and technologies ofinformation.
3) Critique texts according tothe adaptation and
application of relevanttheoretical frameworks,
above all those that haveshaped and defined the field
of literary studies and itsrelationships to other
discourses and culturalmanifestations.
4) Distinguish literary
movements, ranging fromAntiquity to Post-modernity,as well as their relationships
to other cultural discourses.5) Present and develop a
relevant positioning or
perspective, in dialogue with
other relevant perspectives inthe field.
6) Elaborate conclusions
corresponding to the
arguments developed andevidence presented in the
paper.7) Communicate effectively,
critical thinking
skills in final exampaper.
be developed or
demonstrated)2) Contextualize the
hypothesis.3) Make explicit the
premises relevant forthe analysis.
4) Present, developand communicate a
hypothesis that reflectsa perspective or
positioning in dialogueor debate with other
relevant perspectives.5) Present, analyze
and utilize effectively
theinformation/evidence(textual or other).
6) Elaborateconclusions
corresponding to the
arguments developed
and evidencepresented in the paper.
7) Communicate
effectively, coherently
and correctly.8) Critique texts
according to thealteration and
or
LITE 4---
Course ofdirected
selectionwith a
requiredfinal
researchpaper
(in which
the studentswrite their
final thesispapers)
8/3/2019 Plan of Assessment of Student Learning (2011-2012) Literatura Comparada
5/12
Assessment Coordinator: Dra. Marian Polhill Department Chair: Dr. Rubn Ros Date submitted:Nov. 28
CampusMission Domains
Student Learning ObjectivesActivities and
instruments used tocollect information
EvaluationCriteria
ExpectedOutcomes
Instances to collect informationFirst timeFirst yearBachelors
Degree
Second timeAt midtermBachelors
Degree
Third timeAt the end ofthe Bachelors
Degree
coherently and correctly in
Spanish and in English inoral and written contexts.
application of relevant
theoreticalframeworks.
Research and
Creation
The student will be able to:1) Utilize, appropriately and
effectively, sources of
information, both in print
form and on-line (i.e. LibraryCatalogues, Electronic
Databases, etc.)
2) Select relevant
information, in terms of bothquantity and quality, to
develop effectively the topic
of research.
3) Formulate and
demonstrate hypothesesthrough textual analysis and
effective use of relevant
sources in the field, such asprofessional journals,
specialized books, archives,systems and technologies of
information.4) Analyze texts, taking into
account technical, formal,historical and thematic
aspects.5) Present and develop a
relevant positioning orperspective, in dialogue with
Activities:a) Final Research
Papers
Instruments:a) Rubric to assess
research in an
analytical research
paper will be usedto assess effective
research skills in
the final research
paper.
The criteria to beevaluated, as
expressed in the
rubric, are the
following:1) Utilize,
appropriately and
effectively, sources of
information, both inprint form and on-line
(i.e. Library
Catalogues, Electronic
Databases, etc.)
2) Select relevantinformation, in terms
of both quantity and
quality, to developeffectively the topic of
research.3) Formulate an
appropriate hypothesis(the problem, question
or main argument tobe developed or
demonstrated)4) Contextualize the
hypothesis.5) Make explicit the
75% or more of thestudents will receive a
score of 4 or higher (in a 6
point rubric) in all criteria
----------- LITE 3045Introduction
to Compara-
tive
Literature
or
LITE 4---Course of
directed
selection
with a
requiredfinal
research
paper
LITE 4---Course of
directed
selection
with arequired
final
research
paper(in which
the students
write their
final thesis
papers)
8/3/2019 Plan of Assessment of Student Learning (2011-2012) Literatura Comparada
6/12
Assessment Coordinator: Dra. Marian Polhill Department Chair: Dr. Rubn Ros Date submitted:Nov. 28
CampusMission Domains
Student Learning ObjectivesActivities and
instruments used tocollect information
EvaluationCriteria
ExpectedOutcomes
Instances to collect informationFirst timeFirst yearBachelors
Degree
Second timeAt midtermBachelors
Degree
Third timeAt the end ofthe Bachelors
Degree
other relevant perspectives in
the field.6) Elaborate conclusions
corresponding to thearguments developed and
evidence presented in thepaper.
7) Communicate effectively,coherently and correctly in
Spanish and in English inoral and written contexts.
8) Utilize correctly theconventional format relevant
to the discipline for thedocumentation of
bibliographical sources (i.e.
MLA format).
premises relevant for
the analysis.6) Present, develop
and communicate ahypothesis that reflects
a perspective orpositioning in dialogue
or debate with otherrelevant perspectives.
7) Present, analyzeand utilize effectively
theinformation/evidence
(textual or other).8) Elaborate
conclusions
corresponding to thearguments developedand evidence
presented in the paper.9) Communicate
effectively, coherently
and correctly.
10) Critique textsaccording to the
alteration and
application of relevant
theoreticalframeworks.
11) Utilize correctlythe conventional
8/3/2019 Plan of Assessment of Student Learning (2011-2012) Literatura Comparada
7/12
Assessment Coordinator: Dra. Marian Polhill Department Chair: Dr. Rubn Ros Date submitted:Nov. 28
CampusMission Domains
Student Learning ObjectivesActivities and
instruments used tocollect information
EvaluationCriteria
ExpectedOutcomes
Instances to collect informationFirst timeFirst yearBachelors
Degree
Second timeAt midtermBachelors
Degree
Third timeAt the end ofthe Bachelors
Degree
format relevant to the
discipline for thedocumentation of
bibliographicalsources (i.e. MLA
format).
InformationLiteracy
The student will be able to:
1) Utilize, appropriately andeffectively, sources of
information, both in print
form and on-line (i.e. Library
Catalogues, ElectronicDatabases, etc.)
2) Select relevant
information, in terms of both
quantity and quality, to
develop effectively the topicof research.
3) Formulate and
demonstrate hypothesesthrough textual analysis and
effective use of relevantsources in the field, such as
professional journals,specialized books, archives,
systems and technologies ofinformation.
4) Utilize correctly theconventional format relevant
to the discipline for thedocumentation of
Activities:
a) PreliminaryResearch Paper
Proposals
b) Final Research
Papers
Instruments:
a) Rubric to assess
Information
Literacy inresearch for a
research paper will
be used to assessstudent
informationliteracy in the
preliminaryresearch paper
proposal and in thefinal research
paper.
The criteria to be
evaluated, asexpressed in the
rubric, are the
following:
1) Utilize,appropriately and
effectively, sources of
information, both in
print form and on-line
(i.e. LibraryCatalogues, Electronic
Databases, etc.)
2) Select relevantinformation, in terms
of both quantity andquality, to develop
effectively the topic ofresearch.
3) Utilize correctly theconventional format
relevant to thediscipline for the
documentation ofbibliographical
75% or more of the
students will receive ascore of 4 or higher (in a 6
point rubric) in all criteria
--------- LITE 3045
Introductionto Compara-
tive
Literature
or
LITE 4---
Course of
directedselection
with a
requiredfinal
researchpaper
LITE 4---
Course ofdirected
selection
with a
requiredfinal
research
paper
(in which
the studentswrite their
final thesis
papers)
8/3/2019 Plan of Assessment of Student Learning (2011-2012) Literatura Comparada
8/12
Assessment Coordinator: Dra. Marian Polhill Department Chair: Dr. Rubn Ros Date submitted:Nov. 28
CampusMission Domains
Student Learning ObjectivesActivities and
instruments used tocollect information
EvaluationCriteria
ExpectedOutcomes
Instances to collect informationFirst timeFirst yearBachelors
Degree
Second timeAt midtermBachelors
Degree
Third timeAt the end ofthe Bachelors
Degree
bibliographical sources (i.e.
MLA format).
sources (i.e. MLA
format).
8/3/2019 Plan of Assessment of Student Learning (2011-2012) Literatura Comparada
9/12
Assessment Coordinator: Dra. Marian Polhill Department Chair: Dr. Rubn Ros Date submitted:Nov. 28
UNIVERSITY OF PUERTO RICORO PIEDRAS CAMPUS
PLAN OF ASSESSMENT STUDENT LEARNING
PART IIKNOWLEDGE, SKILLS, OR ATTITUDES OF THE ACADEMIC PROGRAM OR MAJOR
Academic Program or Major: Comparative Literature Academi
Knowledge,Skills
or Attitudes of theAcademic Program
or Major
Students Learning ObjectivesActivities and
instruments used tocollect information
EvaluationCriteria
ExpectedOutcomes
Instances to collect information
First timeFirst yearBachelors
Degree
Second timeAt midtermBachelors
Degree
Third timeAt the end ofthe Bachelors
Degree
Knowledge (and
Application ofKnowledge) of
Literary Periods,Movements,
Genres, and
Theories
The student will be able to1) Distinguish literary
movements, ranging fromAntiquity to Post-modernity,
as well as their relationshipsto other cultural discourses.
2) Recognize theoretical
schools that have shaped and
defined the field of literarystudies and its re lationships
to other discourses and
cultural manifestations.
3) Critique texts according tothe adaptation and
application of relevanttheoretical frameworks,
above all those that haveshaped and defined the field
of literary studies and itsrelationships to other
Activities:a) Exams,
discussion type
Instruments:a) Rubric to assess
knowledge and
application of
literary periodsand movements
The criteria to beevaluated, as
expressed in therubric:
1) Conocer losdiferentes contextos
histricos en los
cuales se desarrollan
los movimientosliterarios o tericos
bajo estudio.2) Relacionar los
movimientos literarioso tericos bajo estudio
con otras expresionesculturales de la poca
(filosofa, arte,ciencia, msica,
religin, entre otros).
3) Comprender las
75% or more of thestudents will receive a
score of 4 or higher (in a 6point rubric) in all criteria
LITE 3011or other
preliminary3--- level
course
LITE 3101or LITE
3102
or
LITE 4---
Course of
directedselection
with a
required
finalresearch
paper
LITE 4---Course of
directedselection
with arequired
final
research
paper(in which
the students
write their
final thesispapers)
8/3/2019 Plan of Assessment of Student Learning (2011-2012) Literatura Comparada
10/12
Assessment Coordinator: Dra. Marian Polhill Department Chair: Dr. Rubn Ros Date submitted:Nov. 28
Knowledge,Skills
or Attitudes of theAcademic Program
or Major
Students Learning ObjectivesActivities and
instruments used tocollect information
EvaluationCriteria
ExpectedOutcomes
Instances to collect information
First timeFirst yearBachelors
Degree
Second timeAt midtermBachelors
Degree
Third timeAt the end ofthe Bachelors
Degree
discourses and culturalmanifestations.
4) Analyze texts, taking into
account technical, formal,historical and thematicaspects.
relaciones decontinuidad y
discontinuidad entre
un movimientoliterario o terico y losde otras pocas.
4) Definir conprecisin los
conceptos temticosclaves de un
movimiento literario,cultural o terico.5) Definir conprecisin los discursos
retricos, tericos ogneros literarios que
son empleados en su
objeto de estudio.
6) Identificar a qumovimiento literario,
cultural o terico
pertenece un texto,
ensayo terico oexpresin cultural.
7) Identificar lostemas tpicos de un
movimiento literario,cultural o terico en
un objeto de estudioparticular.
8/3/2019 Plan of Assessment of Student Learning (2011-2012) Literatura Comparada
11/12
Assessment Coordinator: Dra. Marian Polhill Department Chair: Dr. Rubn Ros Date submitted:Nov. 28
Knowledge,Skills
or Attitudes of theAcademic Program
or Major
Students Learning ObjectivesActivities and
instruments used tocollect information
EvaluationCriteria
ExpectedOutcomes
Instances to collect information
First timeFirst yearBachelors
Degree
Second timeAt midtermBachelors
Degree
Third timeAt the end ofthe Bachelors
Degree
8) Aplicar conceptostemticos claves de un
movimiento literario,
cultural o terico en suanlisis.9) Aplicar
correctamente suconocimiento de
discursos retricos,tericos o gneros
literarios como partede su anlisis.
10) Cuestionar,redefinir o ampliar el
repertorio temtico deun movimiento
literario, cultural o
terico a partir de su
propio anlisis delobjeto bajo estudio.
11) Cuestionar,
redefinir o ampliar el
repertorio de discursosretricos, tericos o de
gneros de unmovimiento literario,
cultural o terico apartir de su propio
anlisis del objeto bajoestudio.
8/3/2019 Plan of Assessment of Student Learning (2011-2012) Literatura Comparada
12/12
Assessment Coordinator: Dra. Marian Polhill Department Chair: Dr. Rubn Ros Date submitted:Nov. 28