Plan of Assessment of Student Learning (2011-2012) Literatura Comparada

  • Upload
    oeae

  • View
    222

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/3/2019 Plan of Assessment of Student Learning (2011-2012) Literatura Comparada

    1/12

    Assessment Coordinator: Dra. Marian Polhill Department Chair: Dr. Rubn Ros Date submitted:Nov. 28

    UNIVERSITY OF PUERTO RICORO PIEDRAS CAMPUS

    PLAN OF ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING

    PART ICAMPUSMISSION DOMAINS

    Academic Program or Major: Comparative Literature Academi

    CampusMission Domains

    Student Learning ObjectivesActivities and

    instruments used tocollect information

    EvaluationCriteria

    ExpectedOutcomes

    Instances to collect informationFirst timeFirst yearBachelors

    Degree

    Second timeAt midtermBachelors

    Degree

    Third timeAt the end ofthe Bachelors

    Degree

    Effective Oral

    Communication

    Students will demonstrateeffective oral communication

    in all of their in-class oralpresentations, taking into

    account the following:The student will be able to

    1) Communicate effectively,

    coherently and correctly inSpanish and in English inoral contexts.

    2) Formulate anddemonstrate hypotheses

    through textual analysis and

    effective use of relevant

    sources in the field, such asprofessional journals,

    specialized books, archives,

    systems and technologies of

    information.3) Analyze texts, taking into

    account technical, formal,historical and thematic

    Activities:a) Oral

    Presentation of aCritical Essay

    (summary andcommentary)

    b) Oral

    Presentation ofFinal ResearchProject

    Instruments:

    a) Rubric to assess

    effective oral

    communication inoral presentations

    will be used to

    assess student oral

    communicationskills in an oral

    presentation of acritical essay and

    The criteria to beevaluated, as

    expressed in therubric, are the

    following:1) Communicate the

    presentations main

    argument effectively.2) Communicatecontent effectively on

    a more general level,throughout the

    presentation.

    3) Organize ideas and

    arguments effectivelyin the presentation.

    4) Utilize various

    types of materials

    (audio, visual, etc.) toenhance performance.

    5) Capture and holdthe audiences

    75% or more of thestudents will receive a

    score of 4 or higher (in a 6point rubric) in all criteria

    LITE 3011or other

    preliminary3--- level

    course

    LITE 3045Introduction

    to Compara-tive

    Literature

    or

    LITE 3101or LITE

    3102

    or

    LITE 4---Course of

    directed

    selection

    with arequired

    finalresearch

    LITE 4---Course of

    directedselection

    with arequired

    final

    researchpaper(in which

    the studentswrite their

    final thesis

    papers)

  • 8/3/2019 Plan of Assessment of Student Learning (2011-2012) Literatura Comparada

    2/12

    Assessment Coordinator: Dra. Marian Polhill Department Chair: Dr. Rubn Ros Date submitted:Nov. 28

    CampusMission Domains

    Student Learning ObjectivesActivities and

    instruments used tocollect information

    EvaluationCriteria

    ExpectedOutcomes

    Instances to collect informationFirst timeFirst yearBachelors

    Degree

    Second timeAt midtermBachelors

    Degree

    Third timeAt the end ofthe Bachelors

    Degree

    aspects. in the oral

    presentation of thefinal research

    paper.

    attention through

    quality of voice, eyecontact, questions,

    interaction, and/or byother means.

    6) Demonstrateeffective and

    appropriate use oflanguage.

    paper

    EffectiveWritten

    Communication

    The students will

    demonstrate effective writtencommunication (in Spanish

    or English) in all of their

    written work, taking into

    account the following:

    The student will be able to1) Communicate effectively,

    coherently and correctly in

    Spanish and in English inwritten contexts.

    2) Formulate anddemonstrate hypotheses

    through textual analysis andeffective use of relevant

    sources in the field, such asprofessional journals,

    specialized books, archives,systems and technologies of

    information.3) Analyze texts, taking into

    Activities:

    a) PreliminaryResearch Paper

    Proposals

    b) Final Research

    Papers

    Instruments:

    a) Rubric to assess

    effectivecommunication in

    analytical writingwill be used to

    assess studentwriting skills in

    the preliminaryresearch paper

    proposal and in thefinal research

    paper.

    The criteria to be

    evaluated, asexpressed in the

    rubric, are the

    following:

    1) Communicate

    effectively the mainargument (the thesis

    statement) to be

    developed in theresearch paper.

    2) Communicateeffectively, throughout

    the research paper, thearguments that support

    the thesis statement.3) Communicate ideas

    through the effectiveuse of language.

    4) Demonstrate anacademic and accurate

    75% or more of the

    students will receive ascore of 4 or higher (in a 6

    point rubric) in all criteria

    LITE 3011

    or otherpreliminary

    3--- level

    course

    LITE 3045

    Introductionto Compara-

    tive

    Literature

    or

    LITE 3101

    or LITE3102

    or

    LITE 4---

    Course ofdirected

    selectionwith a

    requiredfinal

    LITE 4---

    Course ofdirected

    selection

    with a

    required

    finalresearch

    paper

    (in whichthe students

    write theirfinal thesis

    papers)

  • 8/3/2019 Plan of Assessment of Student Learning (2011-2012) Literatura Comparada

    3/12

    Assessment Coordinator: Dra. Marian Polhill Department Chair: Dr. Rubn Ros Date submitted:Nov. 28

    CampusMission Domains

    Student Learning ObjectivesActivities and

    instruments used tocollect information

    EvaluationCriteria

    ExpectedOutcomes

    Instances to collect informationFirst timeFirst yearBachelors

    Degree

    Second timeAt midtermBachelors

    Degree

    Third timeAt the end ofthe Bachelors

    Degree

    account technical, formal,

    historical and thematicaspects.

    4) Utilize correctly theconventional format relevant

    to the discipline for thedocumentation of

    bibliographical sources (i.e.MLA format).

    use of language.

    5) Demonstrate anaccurate and

    appropriate use ofvocabulary.

    6) Communicateeffectively through the

    accurate use ofgrammar.

    7) Communicate wellthrough the effective

    organization, format,and presentation of the

    arguments.8) Utilize correctly the

    conventional format

    relevant to thediscipline for thedocumentation of

    bibliographicalsources (i.e. MLA

    format).

    research

    paper

    Critical Thinking

    The student will be able to

    1) Analyze texts, taking intoaccount technical, formal,

    historical and thematicaspects.

    2) Formulate anddemonstrate hypotheses

    through textual analysis andeffective use of relevant

    Activities:

    a) FinalExam/Paper

    Instruments:

    a) Rubric to assesscritical thinking

    will be used toassess student

    The criteria to be

    evaluated, asexpressed in the

    rubric, are thefollowing:

    1) Formulate anappropriate hypothesis

    (the problem, questionor main argument to

    75% or more of the

    students will receive ascore of 4 or higher (in a 6

    point rubric) in all criteria

    LITE 3011

    or otherpreliminary

    3--- levelcourse

    LITE 3101

    (LiteraryTheory)

    or LITE3102

    or LITE

    3045

    LITE 4---

    Course ofdirected

    selectionwith a

    requiredfinal

    researchpaper

  • 8/3/2019 Plan of Assessment of Student Learning (2011-2012) Literatura Comparada

    4/12

    Assessment Coordinator: Dra. Marian Polhill Department Chair: Dr. Rubn Ros Date submitted:Nov. 28

    CampusMission Domains

    Student Learning ObjectivesActivities and

    instruments used tocollect information

    EvaluationCriteria

    ExpectedOutcomes

    Instances to collect informationFirst timeFirst yearBachelors

    Degree

    Second timeAt midtermBachelors

    Degree

    Third timeAt the end ofthe Bachelors

    Degree

    sources in the field, such as

    professional journals,specialized books, archives,

    systems and technologies ofinformation.

    3) Critique texts according tothe adaptation and

    application of relevanttheoretical frameworks,

    above all those that haveshaped and defined the field

    of literary studies and itsrelationships to other

    discourses and culturalmanifestations.

    4) Distinguish literary

    movements, ranging fromAntiquity to Post-modernity,as well as their relationships

    to other cultural discourses.5) Present and develop a

    relevant positioning or

    perspective, in dialogue with

    other relevant perspectives inthe field.

    6) Elaborate conclusions

    corresponding to the

    arguments developed andevidence presented in the

    paper.7) Communicate effectively,

    critical thinking

    skills in final exampaper.

    be developed or

    demonstrated)2) Contextualize the

    hypothesis.3) Make explicit the

    premises relevant forthe analysis.

    4) Present, developand communicate a

    hypothesis that reflectsa perspective or

    positioning in dialogueor debate with other

    relevant perspectives.5) Present, analyze

    and utilize effectively

    theinformation/evidence(textual or other).

    6) Elaborateconclusions

    corresponding to the

    arguments developed

    and evidencepresented in the paper.

    7) Communicate

    effectively, coherently

    and correctly.8) Critique texts

    according to thealteration and

    or

    LITE 4---

    Course ofdirected

    selectionwith a

    requiredfinal

    researchpaper

    (in which

    the studentswrite their

    final thesispapers)

  • 8/3/2019 Plan of Assessment of Student Learning (2011-2012) Literatura Comparada

    5/12

    Assessment Coordinator: Dra. Marian Polhill Department Chair: Dr. Rubn Ros Date submitted:Nov. 28

    CampusMission Domains

    Student Learning ObjectivesActivities and

    instruments used tocollect information

    EvaluationCriteria

    ExpectedOutcomes

    Instances to collect informationFirst timeFirst yearBachelors

    Degree

    Second timeAt midtermBachelors

    Degree

    Third timeAt the end ofthe Bachelors

    Degree

    coherently and correctly in

    Spanish and in English inoral and written contexts.

    application of relevant

    theoreticalframeworks.

    Research and

    Creation

    The student will be able to:1) Utilize, appropriately and

    effectively, sources of

    information, both in print

    form and on-line (i.e. LibraryCatalogues, Electronic

    Databases, etc.)

    2) Select relevant

    information, in terms of bothquantity and quality, to

    develop effectively the topic

    of research.

    3) Formulate and

    demonstrate hypothesesthrough textual analysis and

    effective use of relevant

    sources in the field, such asprofessional journals,

    specialized books, archives,systems and technologies of

    information.4) Analyze texts, taking into

    account technical, formal,historical and thematic

    aspects.5) Present and develop a

    relevant positioning orperspective, in dialogue with

    Activities:a) Final Research

    Papers

    Instruments:a) Rubric to assess

    research in an

    analytical research

    paper will be usedto assess effective

    research skills in

    the final research

    paper.

    The criteria to beevaluated, as

    expressed in the

    rubric, are the

    following:1) Utilize,

    appropriately and

    effectively, sources of

    information, both inprint form and on-line

    (i.e. Library

    Catalogues, Electronic

    Databases, etc.)

    2) Select relevantinformation, in terms

    of both quantity and

    quality, to developeffectively the topic of

    research.3) Formulate an

    appropriate hypothesis(the problem, question

    or main argument tobe developed or

    demonstrated)4) Contextualize the

    hypothesis.5) Make explicit the

    75% or more of thestudents will receive a

    score of 4 or higher (in a 6

    point rubric) in all criteria

    ----------- LITE 3045Introduction

    to Compara-

    tive

    Literature

    or

    LITE 4---Course of

    directed

    selection

    with a

    requiredfinal

    research

    paper

    LITE 4---Course of

    directed

    selection

    with arequired

    final

    research

    paper(in which

    the students

    write their

    final thesis

    papers)

  • 8/3/2019 Plan of Assessment of Student Learning (2011-2012) Literatura Comparada

    6/12

    Assessment Coordinator: Dra. Marian Polhill Department Chair: Dr. Rubn Ros Date submitted:Nov. 28

    CampusMission Domains

    Student Learning ObjectivesActivities and

    instruments used tocollect information

    EvaluationCriteria

    ExpectedOutcomes

    Instances to collect informationFirst timeFirst yearBachelors

    Degree

    Second timeAt midtermBachelors

    Degree

    Third timeAt the end ofthe Bachelors

    Degree

    other relevant perspectives in

    the field.6) Elaborate conclusions

    corresponding to thearguments developed and

    evidence presented in thepaper.

    7) Communicate effectively,coherently and correctly in

    Spanish and in English inoral and written contexts.

    8) Utilize correctly theconventional format relevant

    to the discipline for thedocumentation of

    bibliographical sources (i.e.

    MLA format).

    premises relevant for

    the analysis.6) Present, develop

    and communicate ahypothesis that reflects

    a perspective orpositioning in dialogue

    or debate with otherrelevant perspectives.

    7) Present, analyzeand utilize effectively

    theinformation/evidence

    (textual or other).8) Elaborate

    conclusions

    corresponding to thearguments developedand evidence

    presented in the paper.9) Communicate

    effectively, coherently

    and correctly.

    10) Critique textsaccording to the

    alteration and

    application of relevant

    theoreticalframeworks.

    11) Utilize correctlythe conventional

  • 8/3/2019 Plan of Assessment of Student Learning (2011-2012) Literatura Comparada

    7/12

    Assessment Coordinator: Dra. Marian Polhill Department Chair: Dr. Rubn Ros Date submitted:Nov. 28

    CampusMission Domains

    Student Learning ObjectivesActivities and

    instruments used tocollect information

    EvaluationCriteria

    ExpectedOutcomes

    Instances to collect informationFirst timeFirst yearBachelors

    Degree

    Second timeAt midtermBachelors

    Degree

    Third timeAt the end ofthe Bachelors

    Degree

    format relevant to the

    discipline for thedocumentation of

    bibliographicalsources (i.e. MLA

    format).

    InformationLiteracy

    The student will be able to:

    1) Utilize, appropriately andeffectively, sources of

    information, both in print

    form and on-line (i.e. Library

    Catalogues, ElectronicDatabases, etc.)

    2) Select relevant

    information, in terms of both

    quantity and quality, to

    develop effectively the topicof research.

    3) Formulate and

    demonstrate hypothesesthrough textual analysis and

    effective use of relevantsources in the field, such as

    professional journals,specialized books, archives,

    systems and technologies ofinformation.

    4) Utilize correctly theconventional format relevant

    to the discipline for thedocumentation of

    Activities:

    a) PreliminaryResearch Paper

    Proposals

    b) Final Research

    Papers

    Instruments:

    a) Rubric to assess

    Information

    Literacy inresearch for a

    research paper will

    be used to assessstudent

    informationliteracy in the

    preliminaryresearch paper

    proposal and in thefinal research

    paper.

    The criteria to be

    evaluated, asexpressed in the

    rubric, are the

    following:

    1) Utilize,appropriately and

    effectively, sources of

    information, both in

    print form and on-line

    (i.e. LibraryCatalogues, Electronic

    Databases, etc.)

    2) Select relevantinformation, in terms

    of both quantity andquality, to develop

    effectively the topic ofresearch.

    3) Utilize correctly theconventional format

    relevant to thediscipline for the

    documentation ofbibliographical

    75% or more of the

    students will receive ascore of 4 or higher (in a 6

    point rubric) in all criteria

    --------- LITE 3045

    Introductionto Compara-

    tive

    Literature

    or

    LITE 4---

    Course of

    directedselection

    with a

    requiredfinal

    researchpaper

    LITE 4---

    Course ofdirected

    selection

    with a

    requiredfinal

    research

    paper

    (in which

    the studentswrite their

    final thesis

    papers)

  • 8/3/2019 Plan of Assessment of Student Learning (2011-2012) Literatura Comparada

    8/12

    Assessment Coordinator: Dra. Marian Polhill Department Chair: Dr. Rubn Ros Date submitted:Nov. 28

    CampusMission Domains

    Student Learning ObjectivesActivities and

    instruments used tocollect information

    EvaluationCriteria

    ExpectedOutcomes

    Instances to collect informationFirst timeFirst yearBachelors

    Degree

    Second timeAt midtermBachelors

    Degree

    Third timeAt the end ofthe Bachelors

    Degree

    bibliographical sources (i.e.

    MLA format).

    sources (i.e. MLA

    format).

  • 8/3/2019 Plan of Assessment of Student Learning (2011-2012) Literatura Comparada

    9/12

    Assessment Coordinator: Dra. Marian Polhill Department Chair: Dr. Rubn Ros Date submitted:Nov. 28

    UNIVERSITY OF PUERTO RICORO PIEDRAS CAMPUS

    PLAN OF ASSESSMENT STUDENT LEARNING

    PART IIKNOWLEDGE, SKILLS, OR ATTITUDES OF THE ACADEMIC PROGRAM OR MAJOR

    Academic Program or Major: Comparative Literature Academi

    Knowledge,Skills

    or Attitudes of theAcademic Program

    or Major

    Students Learning ObjectivesActivities and

    instruments used tocollect information

    EvaluationCriteria

    ExpectedOutcomes

    Instances to collect information

    First timeFirst yearBachelors

    Degree

    Second timeAt midtermBachelors

    Degree

    Third timeAt the end ofthe Bachelors

    Degree

    Knowledge (and

    Application ofKnowledge) of

    Literary Periods,Movements,

    Genres, and

    Theories

    The student will be able to1) Distinguish literary

    movements, ranging fromAntiquity to Post-modernity,

    as well as their relationshipsto other cultural discourses.

    2) Recognize theoretical

    schools that have shaped and

    defined the field of literarystudies and its re lationships

    to other discourses and

    cultural manifestations.

    3) Critique texts according tothe adaptation and

    application of relevanttheoretical frameworks,

    above all those that haveshaped and defined the field

    of literary studies and itsrelationships to other

    Activities:a) Exams,

    discussion type

    Instruments:a) Rubric to assess

    knowledge and

    application of

    literary periodsand movements

    The criteria to beevaluated, as

    expressed in therubric:

    1) Conocer losdiferentes contextos

    histricos en los

    cuales se desarrollan

    los movimientosliterarios o tericos

    bajo estudio.2) Relacionar los

    movimientos literarioso tericos bajo estudio

    con otras expresionesculturales de la poca

    (filosofa, arte,ciencia, msica,

    religin, entre otros).

    3) Comprender las

    75% or more of thestudents will receive a

    score of 4 or higher (in a 6point rubric) in all criteria

    LITE 3011or other

    preliminary3--- level

    course

    LITE 3101or LITE

    3102

    or

    LITE 4---

    Course of

    directedselection

    with a

    required

    finalresearch

    paper

    LITE 4---Course of

    directedselection

    with arequired

    final

    research

    paper(in which

    the students

    write their

    final thesispapers)

  • 8/3/2019 Plan of Assessment of Student Learning (2011-2012) Literatura Comparada

    10/12

    Assessment Coordinator: Dra. Marian Polhill Department Chair: Dr. Rubn Ros Date submitted:Nov. 28

    Knowledge,Skills

    or Attitudes of theAcademic Program

    or Major

    Students Learning ObjectivesActivities and

    instruments used tocollect information

    EvaluationCriteria

    ExpectedOutcomes

    Instances to collect information

    First timeFirst yearBachelors

    Degree

    Second timeAt midtermBachelors

    Degree

    Third timeAt the end ofthe Bachelors

    Degree

    discourses and culturalmanifestations.

    4) Analyze texts, taking into

    account technical, formal,historical and thematicaspects.

    relaciones decontinuidad y

    discontinuidad entre

    un movimientoliterario o terico y losde otras pocas.

    4) Definir conprecisin los

    conceptos temticosclaves de un

    movimiento literario,cultural o terico.5) Definir conprecisin los discursos

    retricos, tericos ogneros literarios que

    son empleados en su

    objeto de estudio.

    6) Identificar a qumovimiento literario,

    cultural o terico

    pertenece un texto,

    ensayo terico oexpresin cultural.

    7) Identificar lostemas tpicos de un

    movimiento literario,cultural o terico en

    un objeto de estudioparticular.

  • 8/3/2019 Plan of Assessment of Student Learning (2011-2012) Literatura Comparada

    11/12

    Assessment Coordinator: Dra. Marian Polhill Department Chair: Dr. Rubn Ros Date submitted:Nov. 28

    Knowledge,Skills

    or Attitudes of theAcademic Program

    or Major

    Students Learning ObjectivesActivities and

    instruments used tocollect information

    EvaluationCriteria

    ExpectedOutcomes

    Instances to collect information

    First timeFirst yearBachelors

    Degree

    Second timeAt midtermBachelors

    Degree

    Third timeAt the end ofthe Bachelors

    Degree

    8) Aplicar conceptostemticos claves de un

    movimiento literario,

    cultural o terico en suanlisis.9) Aplicar

    correctamente suconocimiento de

    discursos retricos,tericos o gneros

    literarios como partede su anlisis.

    10) Cuestionar,redefinir o ampliar el

    repertorio temtico deun movimiento

    literario, cultural o

    terico a partir de su

    propio anlisis delobjeto bajo estudio.

    11) Cuestionar,

    redefinir o ampliar el

    repertorio de discursosretricos, tericos o de

    gneros de unmovimiento literario,

    cultural o terico apartir de su propio

    anlisis del objeto bajoestudio.

  • 8/3/2019 Plan of Assessment of Student Learning (2011-2012) Literatura Comparada

    12/12

    Assessment Coordinator: Dra. Marian Polhill Department Chair: Dr. Rubn Ros Date submitted:Nov. 28