6

Phyto82n08 881 - APS Home · genomic DNA, but not with G. pallida genomic DNA, were considered to be enhanced in G. rostochiensis, and vice versa. The Pal clones were prepared in

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Phyto82n08 881 - APS Home · genomic DNA, but not with G. pallida genomic DNA, were considered to be enhanced in G. rostochiensis, and vice versa. The Pal clones were prepared in
Page 2: Phyto82n08 881 - APS Home · genomic DNA, but not with G. pallida genomic DNA, were considered to be enhanced in G. rostochiensis, and vice versa. The Pal clones were prepared in
Page 3: Phyto82n08 881 - APS Home · genomic DNA, but not with G. pallida genomic DNA, were considered to be enhanced in G. rostochiensis, and vice versa. The Pal clones were prepared in
Page 4: Phyto82n08 881 - APS Home · genomic DNA, but not with G. pallida genomic DNA, were considered to be enhanced in G. rostochiensis, and vice versa. The Pal clones were prepared in
Page 5: Phyto82n08 881 - APS Home · genomic DNA, but not with G. pallida genomic DNA, were considered to be enhanced in G. rostochiensis, and vice versa. The Pal clones were prepared in
Page 6: Phyto82n08 881 - APS Home · genomic DNA, but not with G. pallida genomic DNA, were considered to be enhanced in G. rostochiensis, and vice versa. The Pal clones were prepared in