PHILSSA data analysis Final for printing.docx

7/30/2019 PHILSSA data analysis Final for printing.docx

1/21

21

DATA TREATMENT AND ANALYSIS

Socio-Demographic Profile of Respondents

Table 8. Age and Sex of Respondents

NAME OF RELOCATION SITE

NO. OF

RESPONDENTS

AGE OF RESPONDENTS SEX OF

RESPONDENTS

YOUNGEST OLDEST AVERAGE MALE FEMALE

1. Red Cross Village, Brgy.

Digkilaan, Iligan City 23 15 yrs. old 60 yrs. old 35 yrs. old 3 20

2. Bayanihan Village, Brgy.

Sta. Elena, Iligan City 18 23 yrs. old 71 yrs. old 43 yrs. old 1 17

3. Deus Caritas Village, Brgy.

Upper Tominobo, Iligan City 26 23 yrs. old 66 yrs. old 43 yrs. old 3 23


Luinab, Iligan City 25 20 yrs. old 74 yrs. old 40 yrs. old 3 22

5. GMA Kapuso Village, Brgy.

Mandulog, Iligan City 25 21 yrs. old 60 yrs. old 41 yrs. old 1 24


Dalipuga, Iligan City 10 20 yrs. old 49 yrs. old 35 yrs. old 3 7

Table 10 shows the age and sex of respondents. At the outset, there were 127 respondents

interviewed in 6 permanent resettlement sites in Iligan City. Of the total respondents, the

youngest is 15 and the oldest is 74 years old. The average age of respondents is 44 years old.

There were 14 males and 113 females who took part as respondents in the interviews.

During the actual conduct of interviews in the six resettlement sites, it was evident that

most men were absent in the community. However, it was revealed that adolescent and

older men were either working in the farms, driving habal-habal (motorcycle), or doing

pamulawan (small scale individual gold panning in the case of Red Cross Village in Digkilaanand GMA Kaspuso Village in Mandulog) , or worked as carpenters, plumbers, electricians and

other menial jobs in the immediate vicinity of the resettlement sites.

Fig. 51.An interview with an male elderly at Deus Fig. 52. An interview with a female elderly at DeusCaritas, Brgy. Caritas, Dalipuga. Brgy. Luinab.


2/21

22

Table 9. Marital Status and Educational Attainment


TOTAL NO. OF

RESPONDENTS

MARITAL STATUS OF

RESPONDENTS

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

Single Married Widowed Elem HS Col Voc


Digkilaan, Iligan City 23 2 20 1 2 20 1 0


Sta. Elena, Iligan City 18 0 18 0 4 8 6 0


Upper Tominobo, Iligan City 26 3 20 3 9 15 2 0


Luinab, Iligan City 25 3 22` 0 5 16 4 0


Mandulog, Iligan City 25 2 21 2 10 14 1 0


Dalipuga, Iligan City 10 2 6 2 0 10 0 0

TOTAL 127 12 107 8 30 83 14 0

Table 11 shows the marital status and educational attainment of respondents. There were

12 respondents who are single; 107 are married, and 8 are widowed. Of the widowed

respondents, 6 of them revealed that they lost their spouses during the flood.

Eighty-three respondents reached high school; thirty respondents reached grade six, and

fourteen respondents reached college.

Table 10. Status of Nutrition of Respondents

NAME OF RELOCATION SITE NO. OF

RESPONDENTS

AVE. NO.

OF HH

MEMBERS

STATUS OF NUTRITION

BEFORE SENDONG (FREQ

OF EATING /DAY)

STATUS OF NUTRITION

AFTER SENDONG (FREQ OF

EATING /DAY)

1/DAY 2/DAY 3/DAY 1/DAY 2/DAY 3/DAY

1. Red Cross Village, Brgy.Digkilaan, Iligan City 23 6 2 2 19 4 1 18






Luinab, Iligan City 25 6 1 1 23 6 0 19





TOTAL 127 5/HH 11 12 104 23 8 96

Table 12 shows the average number of household members and status of nutrition before

and after Typhoon Sendong. The average number of household members per family is 5.

Majority of respondents revealed that they eat 3 full meals a day with 104 respondents ; 12

respondents said they eat 2 full meals a day, and 11 respondents said they eat only 1 full

meal a day before Typhoon Sendong.


3/21

23

However, after Typhoon Sendong destroyed 35 barangays in Iligan City, 96 respondents

revealed that members of their families eat 3 square meals a day; 8 respondents eat 2 full

meals a day, while 23 respondents revealed that members of their families eat only one full

meal a day. Over-all, the food usually taken consist of rice, salted fish, bagoong (ginamos),

canned goods such as noodles and tinapa and a variety of vegetables.

Fig. 53 What shall we do? We have a house but we have Fig. 54. World Food Programme providing food for

nothing to eat especially for the children). A woman survivors and victims in the resettlement sites.

lamented when interviewed at GMA Kapuso Village in

Brgy. Mandulog.

Fig. 55. What we really need right now is food to survive Fig. 56. How can we survive if not given the opportunity to

A mother who lost her husband during the flood. Work. We lost everything to Sendong including my child


4/21

24

Table 12. Status and Location of Dwelling Before Sendong

NAME OF RELOCATION SITE TOTAL NO. OFRESPONDENTS

STATUS OF DWELLINGS BEFORE

SENDONG

LOCATION OF DWELLING BEFORE

SENDONG

OWNED RENTED OWNED BY

KINS

BESIDE

RIVER

UPLAND COASTAL


Digkilaan, Iligan City 23 12 4 7 21 1 1


Sta. Elena, Iligan City 18 14 4 0 16 0 2


Upper Tominobo, Iligan City 26 11 4 11 16 5 5


Luinab, Iligan City 25 21 0 4 15 2 8


Mandulog, Iligan City 25 20 0 5 19 2 4


Dalipuga, Iligan City 10 0 7 3 8 1 1

TOTAL 127 78 19 30 95 11 21

Table 13 shows the status and location of dwellings before and after Sendong. Of the 127respondents interviewed, 78 respondents revealed they owned their respective dwellings;

19 respondents said they rented it; while 30 respondents revealed that their kins owned the

dwelling they once lived before Sendong. In terms of location of dwellings, 95 respondents

revealed they came from river communities; 21 respondents came from the coastal areas,

while 11 respondents said they came from the upland communities.

Fig. 57. Orchid Homes totally destroyed by Fig. 58. River community of Lambaguhon totally

Sendong. washed out during Sendong.


5/21

25

Table 13. Properties Owned Before and After Sendong


PROPERTIES OWNED BEFORE SENDONG PROPERTIES OWNED AFTER SENDONG

APPLIANCES KITCHEN

WARES

LIVELIHOOD

FACILITIES

APPLIANCES KITCHEN

WARES

LIVELIHOOD

FACILITIES



2. Bayanihan Village, Brgy.Sta. Elena, Iligan City 18 18 18 4 4 18 2









TOTAL 127 110 126 34 58 87 15

Table 14. shows ownership of properties before and after Sendong. For properties owned

before Sendong, a total of 110 respondents revealed they owned a variety of appliances such

as TV, components, personal computers, laptops, etc.; 126 of respondents owned kitchen

wares, and 34 respondents owned livelihood facilities such as pump boats and nets for

fishing; sing-along or video-5; computers for internet caf; jeepneys and motorcycles for

public utility and other facilities intended for income-generation. However, after Sendong, all

respondents revealed that they lost everything due to the typhoon and robbers. They also

revealed that they sold the remaining properties at a very low prices or sold it to junkshops.

At Bayanihan Village, majority of the respondents revealed that at present, they do not own

a single property. The properties that they using at present were either donated or given by

donors. However, there were respondents who said that they owned nothing before and

after Sendong.

Table 14. Members of Family Missing or Dead and Relevant Incidents

Experienced After Sendong


MEMBERS OF

FAMILY DEAD

OR MISSING

RELEVANT INCIDENTS AFTER SENDONG

ILLNESSES FLOOD LOSS OF

LIVELIHOOD


Digkilaan, Iligan City 23 18 20 4 232. Bayanihan Village, Brgy.

Sta. Elena, Iligan City 18 35 16 16 13

3. Deus Caritas Village, Brgy.Upper Tominobo, Iligan City 26 11 11 11 6


Luinab, Iligan City 25 8 17 9 45. GMA Kapuso Village, Brgy.

Mandulog, Iligan City 25 9 15 12 16. Deus Caritas Village, Brgy.

Dalipuga, Iligan City 10 4 7 3 1

TOTAL 127 85 86 55 48


6/21

26

Table 15 reveals numbers of members of family missing or dead and relevant incidents

experienced after Sendong. Of the 127 total respondents, 85 family members either died or

still missing at present. Bayanihan Village at Sta. Elena (in which most beneficiaries came

from Bayug Island) recorded the most number of deaths in the family. Red Cross Village (in

which most beneficiaries came from Upper Hinaplanon) came in second with 18 deaths.

Fig. 59. List of missing persons posted in a local Fig. 60. Bayug Island has the most number of

funeral parlor. dead and missing persons.

Fig. 61. A father grieving for his daughters death. Fig. 62. Children were listed as most number of

(courtesy of Google) dead and missing (courtesy of Google)

In terms of relevant incidents experienced by respondents after Sendong, illnesses came in

first with 86 cases; flooding came in second with 55 cases and loss of livelihood opportunities

came in third with 48 cases. In Red Cross Village, several houses were flooded, but most

residents were able to vacate to nearby higher places before Typhoon Pablo flooded the

community. In Bayanihan Village, knee-deep flood brought about by Typhoon Pablo were

likewise experienced by the residents.


7/21

27

Table 16. Paid Work Before Sendong and Current Self-Assessment of Poverty

NAME OF RELOCATION SITE TOTAL NO. OF

RESPONDENTS

PAID WORK BEFORE SENDONG SELF-ASSESSED

POVERTY

WORKED

IN THE

GOVT.

WORKED

IN PRIVATE

SECTOR

OWNED

BUSINESS OR

LIVELIHOOD

NOT

SO

POOR

POOR VERYPOOR




Sta. Elena, Iligan City 18 1 5 12 1 7 10









TOTAL 127 5 46 55 7 73 47

Table 16 reveals the status of work before Sendong and the current self-assessed poverty

situation of the respondents. Of the 127 total respondents, 55 respondents revealed they

owned family business or were previously engaged in livelihood activities; 46 respondents

worked in the private sector, while 5 respondents worked in the government.

Fig. 54. Small-scale mining activity in the hinterlands of Fig. 55. A sari-sari store in Deus Caritas Village in Brgy.

Iligan still continue to provide income especially among Upper Tominobo, Iligan City.

survivors and local residents.

Fig. 56. Washed out logs confiscated during Sendong. Fig. 57. Face of poverty in Hinaplanon after Sendong.


8/21

28

In terms of self-assessed poverty situation, 73 respondents revealed they are poor; 47

respondents said they are very poor; while 7 respondents said they are not so poor. For

respondent who owned business or engaged in livelihood activities before Sendong, majority

of them revealed they were mostly engaged in farming, habal-habaland sikad driving or

owned small sari-sari stores. Others were also engaged inpanguling (charcoal); or involved in

small-scale mining or pamulawan and small-scale logging activities, especially in the

hinterland barangays of Rogongon and Panoroganan.

Table 16. Types of Materials Used in Housing Units and Parts of Dwelling Included

in the Construction.


RESPONDENTS

TYPE OF MATERIALS USED IN HOUSING UNITS

CONCRETE AND

STEEL

WOOD CONCRETE AND WOOD


Digkilaan, Iligan City 23 0 0 23


Sta. Elena, Iligan City 18 14 0 4


Upper Tominobo, Iligan City 26 0 0 26


Luinab, Iligan City 25 16 0 9


Mandulog, Iligan City 25 25 0 0


Dalipuga, Iligan City 10 0 0 10

TOTAL 127 55 0 72

Table 8 reveals the types of materials used in the construction of housing units. Of the total

respondents, 91 revealed that their housing units were made of a combination of concrete

and steel, while 36 respondents coming from Deus Caritas, Dalipuga and Upper Tominobo

said that their housing units were a combination of wood and concrete.

Table 18. Contribution in Housing Construction


RESPONDENTS

TYPES OF CONTRIBUTION IN HOUSING CONSTRUCTION

MONEY SWEAT EQUITY CONSTRUCTION

MATERIALS


Digkilaan, Iligan City 23 6 23 0


Sta. Elena, Iligan City 18 0 18 03. Deus Caritas Village, Brgy.

Upper Tominobo, Iligan City 26 0 26 0


Luinab, Iligan City 25 0 25 05. GMA Kapuso Village, Brgy.

Mandulog, Iligan City 25 0 25 06. Deus Caritas Village, Brgy.

Dalipuga, Iligan City 10 0 10 0TOTAL 127 6 127 0


9/21

29

Table 19 reveals the type of contribution in the construction of housing units. All 127

respondents revealed that they were required to render 500 hours of sweat equity as

counterpart in the construction of housing units. However, 6 respondents disclosed that they

extended monetary contribution in lieu of the sweat equity required of them.

Table 18. Availability of Water Supply, Electricity and Garbage Disposal System


AVAILABILITY OF WATER SUPPLY, ELECTRICITY AND GARBAGE DISPOSAL

SYSTEM

WATER ELECTRICITY GARBAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM


Digkilaan, Iligan City

Deep well, river, springs

and mineral water None

Burning, composting and

throwing garbage to river


Sta. Elena, Iligan City

Deep well, water supply

from ICWS, mineral water None

Scheduled garbage collection

and composting


Upper Tominobo, Iligan City

Rainwater, spring, mineral

water None Composting


Luinab, Iligan City

Rainwater, deep well,

mineral water Present

Scheduled garbage collection

5. GMA Kapuso Village, Brgy.Mandulog, Iligan City Deep well and river None

Composting and throwing ofgarbage to river


Dalipuga, Iligan City Rainwater and Spring None Composting

Table 19 assessed the presence of water supply, electricity and garbage disposal system.

Although concrete electrical posts and wiring are available, no supply of electricity is present

in all resettlement. Garbage disposal practices vary according to the nature and type of sites

located. Water supply are mostly extracted from deep wells and water catchment facilities.


10/21

30

Table 20. Problems Encountered Inside Permanent Resettlement Sites

NAME OF

RELOCATION SITE

PROBLEMS ENCOUNTERED INSIDE RELOCATION SITE

PHYSICAL STRUCTURE OF

DWELLINGS

LAND ENVIRONMENTAL

RISKS

1. Red Cross Village,

Brgy. Digkilaan,

Iligan City

Absence of canals and

waterways; concrete road moreelevated than lowest ground of

housing units; cracks are evident

in some dwellings and septic

tanks; floor area of housing

units is 5 x 7 mtrs.;

Originally rice field area

converted to settlement; mayhave problem with

compaction or filling;

settlement quite near or

proximate to main river

tributary; area is near to

main road

Prone to flood and

land -slides since siteis located near

approximately 90

degrees slope of

mountains

surrounding the area.

2. Bayanihan Village,

Brgy. Sta. Elena,

Iligan City

Gaping cracks evident in walls,

floors, and septic tanks; small

amount of rain will lead to

flooding since cracks are

likewise present in most

ceilings; housing units located

almost 12 inches below

concrete road with no visiblecanals or waterways; floor area

of housing units is 5 x 7mtrs.

Originally, rice field area

converted to settlement; may

also have problem with

compaction and filling;

settlement very near river

system; area is near to main

access road.

Very prone to flood

and several areas

prone to landslides

due to its proximity

with 75-80 degrees

slope of mountains

surrounding the

settlement.

3. Deus Caritas

Village, Brgy.

Upper Tominobo,

Iligan City

Building materials a

combination of concrete and

coco lumber; structures not

quite strong, floor area of

housing units is 5 x 7 mtrs.

Originally a rice field area

converted to settlement; may

have problem with

compaction or filling;

settlement quite near or

proximate to main river

tributary; area near to main

road.

Resettlement within

above 45 degrees

slope; risky and prone

to landslide and

flooding.

4. Deus Caritas

Village, Brgy.

Luinab,Iligan City

Building materials are flood

resilient; combination of steel

and concrete; roads are all

concreted; available gym andpublic market; canal, waterways

and pipes for water system

installed.

Original limestone, suitable

and safe for human

settlement;

located proximate tomountains on the sides but

with no visible risks to

landslides.

Safe from any

environmental risks

and hazards; slightly

slopping..

5. GMA Kapuso

Village, Brgy.

Mandulog,

Iligan City

Building materials are concrete

and seem to be flood-resilient;

roads are all concreted;

available school and public

market; canal, waterways and

pipes for water system installed;

no visible project for flood

control.

Original sand, gravel and

boulders; flat terrain; located

proximate to mountains on

the sides;

Very risky to flooding

since river bed is just

less than 2meters

below flooring of

housing units.

6. Deus Caritas Village,

Brgy. Dalipuga,

Iligan City

Building materials a

combination of concrete and

coco lumber; structures quitestrong; septic tanks are plastic

drums embedded 2 meters

below land surface; may have

problems with waste disposal

later on; floor area of housing

units is 5 x 6 mtrs.

Land type is limestone;

housing units are constructed

in a mountain areaapproximately 45 degrees

slope; settlement is adjacent

to main access road.

Very prone to

landslide; settlement

is most vulnerable tohigh winds because of

absence of trees and

vegetations that may

provide protection ;

constant soil erosion is

mostly to occur.


11/21

31

Table 20 reveals the problems encountered inside the 6 permanent sites. Except for the Deus

Caritas Village in Brgy. Luinab, all sites are disaster-prone and exhibit several structural and

physical defects. In Bayanihan Village in Sta. Elena, for example, most dwellings units that

were earlier constructed manifested defects in terms of structures, location and land

acquisition. In the Deus Caritas Village in Dalipuga, the permanent housing site is located

within +45 degrees slope with no visible trees and vegetation to prevent landslides and

possible soil erosion.

Table 20. Land Classification and Land Capability of Permanent Resettlement Sites


ORIGINAL LAND CLASSIFICATION OF

HOUSING SITE

LAND CAPABILITY OF

RESETTLEMENT SITE

RESIDENTIAL AGRI COMMERCIAL REFILLED SOLID WEAK


Digkilaan, Iligan City X X


Sta. Elena, Iligan City X X


Upper Tominobo, Iligan City X X4. Deus Caritas Village, Brgy.

Luinab, Iligan City X X


Mandulog, Iligan City X X


Dalipuga, Iligan City X X

Table 21 reveals the original land classification of all permanent resettlement sites. In

general, all sites were originally agricultural, but where converted into residential to

accommodate the shelter needs of the internally-displaced persons (IDPs) affected by TS

Sendong. In terms of land capability, 3 sites were considered to have stood in solid grounds;

1 site were refilled with sand and gravel, while 2 sites were considered to have been built on

weak grounds.

Table 21. Knowledge of Ownership of Land and Status of Ownership of Housing Units of

Resettlement Sites

NAME OF RELOCATION SITE KNOWLEDGE OF OWNERSHIP OF LAND OF RESETTLEMENT SITE

PUBLIC LAND PRIVATE LAND CHURCH- OWNED (Donated)


Digkilaan, Iligan City X


Sta. Elena, Iligan City X


Upper Tominobo, Iligan Cit X


Luinab, Iligan City X


Mandulog, Iligan City X


Dalipuga, Iligan City X


12/21

32

Table 22 reveals the ownership of land of the 6 permanent resettlement sites of IDPs. Three

land sites are considered owned by the local government; 1 land site was donated by a

private donor, and 2 sites are owned by the Diocese of Iligan. However, most respondents

during the interview disclosed that they do not have prior knowledge regarding ownership of

land and dwellings where they are currently being resettled..

Table 22. Visibility of Planners/Implementors of Housing Projects and Donors

of Housing Units As Perceived by IDPs in Resettlement Sites


VISIBLE PLANNERS/

IMPLEMENTORS OF HOUSING

PROJECT IN RESETTLEMENT SITES

DONORS OF DWELLINGS OF HOUSING

UNITS

LOCAL

GOVT DONORS BENEFICIARIES GOVT.CIVIC

ORG.

INTL

NGO RELATIVES


Digkilaan, Iligan City X X X X X


Sta. Elena, Iligan City X X X X X


Upper Tominobo, Iligan City X X X X X4. Deus Caritas Village, Brgy.

Luinab, Iligan City X X X X X


Mandulog, Iligan City X X X X X


Dalipuga, Iligan City X X X X

Table 23 presents the visibility of planners/Implementors of housing projects and donors

of housing units as perceived by IDPs in the permanent resettlement sites. Except for the

Deus Caritas Village in Dalipuga, visibility of the LGU-HRO (Housing and Resettlement Office),

in site development and construction was not clear. However, respondents in the other sites

disclosed the active participation and visibility of donors, builders and the LGU, particularly

HRO and the DPWH, in site development and actual construction of housing units. Active

presence of these groups were likewise evident in the screening and selection of

beneficiaries, monitoring and evaluation, and turn-over of housing units to qualified

beneficiaries. In terms of donors of housing units, most respondents disclosed that they

have prior knowledge of the donors (civic and religious groups and international

humanitarian organizations) who were extending support in the construction of housing

units.


13/21

33

Table 23. Agencies and Groups that Extended Support and Types of Material Support

Received Aside from Housing.


AGENCIES/GROUPS THAT

EXTENDED SUPPORT

TYPES OF MATERIAL SUPPORT RECEIVED ASIDE

FROM HOUSING

GOVT. NGOs

RELIGIOUS

ORGS

FOOD/

MEDICINE

CLOTHING LOAN/

MONEY

UTENSILS


Digkilaan, Iligan City 23 14 23 21 23 23 0 21






Luinab, Iligan City 25 18 16 18 23 25 0 25





TOTAL 127 88 101 112 117 127 2 125

Table 24 shows the agencies and groups that extended support to IDPs and the types of

material support received aside from housing. Of the total respondents, 88 disclosed they

received support from the LGU; 101 received support from non-government organizations,

while 112 respondents received support from religious organizations.

Clothing was the most common type of support given with 127 respondents; kitchen utensils

came in second with 125 respondents; food and medicine came in third with 117

respondents. Only two respondents disclosed they received direct financial aid from donors.

Table 24 Types of Project Supported and Nature of Financial Assistance Received


TYPES OF PROJECTS

SUPPORTED

NATURE OF FINANCIAL

ASSISTANCE RECEIVED

LENDING

LIVELI-

HOOD AGRI NONE GRANT LOAN USURY NONE


Digkilaan, Iligan City 23 0 8 1 14 0 9 0 14


Sta. Elena, Iligan City 18 0 5 0 13 0 5 0 13


Upper Tominobo, Iligan City 26 9 7 0 10 0 7 9 10


Luinab, Iligan City 25 0 0 0 25 0 0 0 25


Mandulog, Iligan City 25 0 0 0 25 0 0 0 256. Deus Caritas Village, Brgy.

Dalipuga, Iligan City 10 1 0 0 9 0 3 0 7

TOTAL 127 10 20 1 96 0 24 9 94

Table 25 shows the types of projects supported and the nature of financial assistance

received or given to IDPs. Of the 127 respondents interviewed, 96 respondents said they had

not received financial assistance of projects promised to them; 20 respondents said they


14/21

34

received minimal fund on livelihood project; 10 respondents acquired funding assistance

through lending or loan package; while one respondent received funding assistance on

agriculture project. For IDPs who received financial assistance, 21 respondents acquired it

through loan; 9 acquired it through usury; no respondent has availed of any grants, and 94

respondents has not received any financial assistance.

Table 25. Sufficiency of Support Received After Sendong


SUFFICIENCY OF SUPPORT EXTENDED AFTER SENDONG

HOUSING FOOD CLOTHING MEDICINE LIVELI-

HOOD

FINANCIAL

ASSISTANCE

HOUSE

WARES

WATER

SUPPLY


Digkilaan, Iligan City Sufficient Lacking Sufficient Lacking Lacking Lacking Sufficient Lacking


Sta. Elena, Iligan City Sufficient Lacking Sufficient Lacking Lacking Lacking Sufficient Lacking

3. Deus Caritas Village, Brgy.Upper Tominobo, Iligan City Sufficient Lacking Sufficient Lacking Lacking Lacking Lacking Lacking


Luinab, Iligan City Sufficient Lacking Lacking Lacking Lacking Lacking Sufficient Lacking


Mandulog, Iligan City Sufficient Lacking Sufficient Lacking Lacking Lacking Sufficient Lacking


Dalipuga, Iligan City Sufficient Lacking Lacking Lacking Lacking Lacking Sufficient Lacking

Table 26 shows the status on sufficiency of support received after Sendong. Generally,

housing units, clothing and housewares were sufficiently provided by donors, while provision

on food, medicine, livelihood opportunities, financial assistance and supply of potable water

were insufficient.

Table 26. Status of Water Sanitation and Hygiene


WATER SANITATION AND HYGIENCE

Source of Water for

Domestic Use

Source of Water

for Drinking

Potability of

Existing Water

Source

Availability of

Comfort Rooms



Deep well, river and

spring

Deep Well/

Red Cross Contaminated Inside Dwelling Units



Deep Well, water

supply from ICWS

Deep Well/

Refilling Station Contaminated Inside Dwelling Units


Upper Tominobo, Iligan City

Water supply from

ICWS

ICWS,



Luinab, Iligan City

Deep Well, water

supply from ICWS

Deep Well,



Mandulog, Iligan City

Deep well, river and

spring

Deep Well,

Refilling Station Contaminated Inside Dwelling Units6. Deus Caritas Village, Brgy.

Dalipuga, Iligan City Rainwater Reservoir Contaminated Inside Dwelling Units

Table 27 reflects the status of water sanitation and hygiene of the permanent resettlement

sites of IDPs. Generally, sources of water are deep wells, rivers, spring, rainwater and water

coming from the Iligan City Waterworks System (ICWS). In terms of potability of existing

water sources, all sources are contaminated.


15/21

35

For household families who can afford to buy mineral water from refilling stations in the city

proper, the average consumption cost per week is Php120.00. Comfort rooms are built inside

in almost all housing units. For resettlement sites where water pumps are installed, the

average distance is less than 15 meters away where septic tanks are located.

Table 27. Problems Encountered Regarding Distance of Relocation Sites to Workplace


PROBLEMS ENCOUNTERED REGARDING DISTANCE OF RELOCATION SITES TO

WORKPLACE AND SECURITY RISKS

Cost of

Transportation

Distance of RS

to Workplace

Mode of

Transportation

Available

Risks Especially

During Nighttime



Php60.00-100/

person

8 Kilometers

(Rogongon) Jeep, Habal-habal

Limited Police

Visibility



Php14.00-

20.00/ person

14 Kilometers

(City Proper) Jeep, Habal-habal

Limited Police

Visibility

3. Deus Caritas Village, Brgy.Upper Tominobo, Iligan City

Php20.00-

40.00/person

12 Kilometers


Limited Police

Visibility

4. Deus Caritas Village,

Brgy. Luinab, Iligan City

Php10.00-

12.00/person

7 Kilometers


Limited Police

Visibility

5. GMA Kapuso Village,Brgy. Mandulog, Iligan City

Php50.00-

100.00/person

15 Kilometers

(City Proper) Habal-habal

Limited Police

Visibility


Dalipuga, Iligan City

Php18.00-

20.00/person

12 kilometers


Limited Police

Visibility

Table 28 shows the problems encountered regarding distance of relocation sites to

workplace. The farthest resettlement sites is the GMA Kapuso Village which is 15 kms away

from the city proper. The site is accessible only by riding habal-habalwith transportation

cost amounting to Php100.00/person. The nearest resettlement site is the Deus Caritas

Village in Brgy. Luinab which is 7 kms from the city proper. The site can be accessed through

regular public utility vehicles plying the area with cost of fare amounting to Php10-12. Habal-

habalalso ply the area with fare amounting to Php30-40.

Table 28. Sources of Income at Present


RESPONDENTS

SOURCES OF INCOME AT PRESENT

FARMING LABOR SMALL

MINING

OFW SARI-SARI

STORE

HABAL

HABAL

TRI-

SIKAD

SMALL

BUSINESS


Digkilaan, Iligan City23 5 8 3 1 2 3 0 1


Sta. Elena, Iligan City18 0 6 0 0 3 2 3 4


Upper Tominobo, Iligan

City

26 0 13 1 0 8 0 4 0


Luinab, Iligan City25 0 16 0 0 5 0 3 1


Mandulog, Iligan City25 16 6 0 0 2 0 0 1


Dalipuga, Iligan City10 0 7 1 0 2 0 0 0

TOTAL 127 22 56 5 1 21 5 10 7


16/21

36

Table 29 presents the current sources of income of IDPs. Skilled work and Labor is still the

major source of income with 56 respondents; followed by farming with 22 respondents; sari-

saristore with 21 respondents; trisikaddriving with 10 respondents; small business (lending

and street vending); and small mining and logging with 5 respondents. Two respondents are

also engaged in firewood gathering. Average income per day is Php120.

Table 29. Presence of Relevant Infrastructure Inside Permanent Resettlement sites

NAME OF RELOCATION

SITES

PRESENCE OF RELEVANT INFRASTRUCTURE INSIDE RELOCATION SITES

PRE- SCHOOL

BUILDING

CONCRETE

ROAD

DRAINAGE

SYSTEMHEALTH

CENTER

WATER

SYSTEM

MARKET GYM


Digkilaan, Iligan City None None None None None None None


Sta. Elena, Iligan City None On-going On-Going None On-going None None


Upper Tominobo, Iligan City None None None None None Completed On-Going


Luinab, Iligan City NoneAlmost

complete

Almost

complete

Almost

complete

Almost

Complete Completed Completed


Mandulog, Iligan City Completed On-going On-going Completed On-going None none


Dalipuga, Iligan City None None None None None None None

Table 30 shows the status of relevant infrastructures inside the permanent resettlement

sites. In general, installation of relevant infrastructures are still going on and are expected to

be completed in 2014, with the exception of the Deus Caritas Village in Brgy. Dalipuga in

which development intervention is not given priority.


17/21

37

RECOMMENDATIONS

This research study would like to recommend the following strategies and actions to address

the need of the internally-displaced persons in the Six Permanent Resettlement Sites, as well

as, in responding the need for climate change mitigation and adaptation in Iligan City.On Recommendations to Address Climate Change in Iligan City;

1. Implement a comprehensive review on Climate Change Vulnerability and RiskAssessment and Mapping, especially in the six permanent resettlement sites in

Iligan City;

2. Work for the improvement of nationwide and localized weather and floodingforecasting and establishment of early warning systems (including indigenous EWRs)

modeling capabilities;

3. Integrate hazard mapping with the new components that identify areas andfrequency of weather related hazard s such as cyclones, super typhoons, floods

storm, tidal surges, extreme rainfall landslide prone areas and others and critical

rivers systems;

4. Include the development of a comprehensive culture-sensitive land use and coastaldevelopment plan that integrate risk reductions supported by local zoning

ordinance;

5. Establish a community driven coping mechanisms and strategies that includeparticipation of women and children in disaster risk reduction management and

preparedness;

6. Push for effective and sustainable programs to enhance the level of climate changeawareness among policy makers, decision makers, as well as the various

stakeholders

media, students and the academe, civil society and general public fortheir own empowerment;

7. Implement the Riparian Law Enforcement that river reserves must be maintainedwithin 40 meters from the riverbank, or such other distance as prescribed by

National Resource Board/ NIA, and any designated river reserve in order to minimize

the risk of flooding especially in permanent resettlement areas in Mandulog,

Digkilaan, Upper Tominobo and Sta. Elena;

8. Dredging of clogged drainage systems and regular maintenance operations fordrainage to effectively convey excess water to point of discharge, and establish rain

and river gauging stations for monitoring and planning purposes;

9. Formulate and implement effective tri-people information and education campaignamong upstream, midstream and coastal communities regarding occurrence offloods and how to reduce its risks and impacts before it can bring devastation and

destruction to lives and properties;

10.Formulate a Comprehensive Master Development Plan of the City, to include theinterests and needs of the Moro, Higa-onon (indigenous people) and Christian

Settlers to be enacted to become a local ordinance;


18/21

38

11.Establish a unit under the City Planning and Development Office (CPDO) toimplement, monitor, evaluate and periodically update the comprehensive master

development, into which DRRM is an integral component.

On Recommendations to Address Particular Need of IDPs:

Physical and Structural

1. Responsibility of drainage restoration or rehabilitation along the natural drainageand waterways in the permanent resettlement sites be given to the barangay

councils and housing associations to police the banks from illegal garbage dumps;

2. LGU to appropriate funding to upgrade the drainage division of the CEO; employcompetent personnel to plan, implement, monitor, evaluate and maintain drainage

facilities in the permanent resettlement sites;

3. Identify and come-up with flood mitigation plans and mechanism especially inBayanihan Village in Sta. Elena; red cross Village in Digkilaan; GMA Kapuso Village in

Mandulog; Deus Caritas Village in Dalipuga in the event that floods and landslide will

occur in said permanent resettlement sites;

4. LGU and DENR- MGB to conduct disaster risk reassessment and evaluation of landcapability of the six ( 6 ) permanent resettlement sites;

5. LGU to reevaluate and/or reassess the building status (housing units and landownership) in the six permanent resettlement sites;

6. LGU to provide basic physical needs of IDPs i.e. potable water systems, electricityand basic infrastructure (health centers, schools, multipurpose building, etc.) in all

resettlement sites;

Organizational Development and Local Empowerment

1. Organize, train and mobilize local housing associations in all resettlement sites andempower them to participate and be active members of the Barangay Development

Councils and other local special bodies;

2. Strengthen coordination and partnership with NGOs, POs, civil society groups, morosultanate and tribal elders, and international humanitarian organizations for mutual

support and partnerships;

3. Strengthen ties and linkageswith LGUs and with the DSWD, CSWD, DENR, DPWHand other local national agencies for funding, livelihood and technical support;

4. Provide venues for the Moro, Higaonon and Christian Settlers for continuingdialogues especially in addressing their particular socio-economic, religious and

cultural needs as IDPs in the permanent resettlement sites.


19/21

39

Socio- Economic and Alternative Livelihood Program and Projects

1. LGUs DSWD, CSWD, NGOs and other humanitarian groups to provide and allocate

funds and technical assistance/ support for appropriate alternative income-

generating activities of IDPs;

2. Provide capacity -building and enhancement programs on appropriate technologies

to enable IDPs, to engage in appropriate self-reliant and self-help socio-economic

programs and projects.

On Trauma Healing and Counseling

1. Provide venues for culture-sensitive trauma healing and counseling using creativearts especially among children who lost family members during TS Sendong;

2. Establish referral system (with government and non-government institutions) forsurvivors who need formal psychosocial and healing interventions.


20/21

40

REFERENCES

Aerial View of Iligan City, Google Map, 2013.

A Relocation Project Monitoring Updates, LIAC, 2013.

BSAAC Evaluation Report, HRO, Photo Documentation, January 2013.

Checking Condition of Survivors, Photo Documentation, HRO, 2012.

DENR-MGB 10 Doing Risk Assessment at Brgy. Sta. Elena, 2012.

Doing Site Development at Brgy. Upper Tominobo, Photo Documentation, 2013.

Families Grieving for the Loss of Properties and Loved Ones, Photo Documentation, 2011.

Floodmark in Purok Ilang-Ilang, Brgy. Sta. Felomina, Photo Documentation, DENR-MGB 10,

January 2012.

Flood Susceptibility Map of Parts of Iligan City, DENR-MGB 10, January 2011.

IMCC Food Distribution Among Sending Survivors, Photo Documentation, 2012.

Inter-Agency Consultation with CSOs and International Humanitarian Organizations, HRO,

2012.

LGU Officials With International Committee of the Red Cross, HRO, 2012.

LIAC Meeting, Photo Documentation, HRO, 2012.

Limunsudan Falls, Photo Documentation, 2012.

List of Transitory Shelters, HRO, 2013.

Location Map of Iligan City, Google Map, 2012.

Mandulog River After Sendong, AFP Aerial Photo, 2012.

Mandulog River Before Sendong, Google Map, 2013.

MOA Signing with Officials from Habitat for Humanity, Photo Documentation, HRO, 2012.

Monitoring Flood Victims at Kabangahan, Photo Documentation, AFP, 2012.

More Housing Units at GMA Kapuso Village, Photo Documentation, 2013.

NGO Volunteers Doing Medical Mission, Photo Documentation, 2012.

On-Going Construction of Housing Units at Bayanihan Village, Photo Documentation, 2013.

Path of Typhoon Sendong that Destroyed the Cities of Iligan, Cagayan de Oro and Bukidnon,

DENR-MGB 10, January 2012.

Project Status Report: Relocation Project for Sendong Survivors, HRO, October 12, 2011.

Project Status Report of Six Permanent Settlement Sites for Sendong Survivors, HRO, 2012.

School Building Destroyed by Sendong in Brgy. Santiago, Photo Documentation, DENR-MGB

10, January 2012.


21/21

41

Small-Scale Mining Activity at the Hinterlands of Iligan City, Photo Documentation, 2010.

Summary Report of Iligan City Validation for Victims of TS Sendong, DSWD/CSWD, 2012.

Tinago Falls, Photo Documentation, 2012.

The Wrath of Sendong Claiming Millions of Damages, Photo Documentation, 2011,

TS Sendong Disaster Report, National Disaster Risk Reduction Management (NDRRM),

January 2011.

Volunteers And Military Sending Relief Goods and Medicines, AFP Documentation, 2012.

Washed Out Logs Confiscated After Sendong, Photo Documentation, 2012.

Documents

PHILSSA data analysis Final for printing.docx