Upload
resperado
View
224
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/2/2019 PHIL408O Notes - 6 Feb 2012
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/phil408o-notes-6-feb-2012 1/3
PHIL408O - Morality and Cognitive Science
Notes
6 February 2012
Normative Ethics
Right is not just good, it is morally obligatoryMorally permissible (circle outside)
Morally impermissible = it is morally obligatory not to do something
Rights --> duty
^ correlative
How moral properties are related to non moral properties
Hume philosophy - morality is in our heads?
Aprobation (positive projection) vs disaprobation (negative projection)
Social Convention - gender, religion?
vs Natural - formal logic
ethics somewhere in the middle?
re religion:
Sperber, Dan
Atran, Scott
emotivism = boo horay view of moral judgement = non-cognitivism
normative ethics vs. meta-ethics
Rationalism:
The Intuition/Deduction Thesis: Some propositions in a particular subject area, S, are knowable
by us by intuition alone; still others are knowable by being deduced from intuited propositions.
The second thesis associated with rationalism is the Innate Knowledge thesis.
The Innate Knowledge Thesis: We have knowledge of some truths in a particular subject area, S,
as part of our rational nature.
The Innate Concept Thesis: We have some of the concepts we employ in a particular subject
area, S, as part of our rational nature.
The Indispensability of Reason Thesis: The knowledge we gain in subject area, S, by intuition
and deduction, as well as the ideas and instances of knowledge in S that are innate to us, could
not have been gained by us through sense experience.
8/2/2019 PHIL408O Notes - 6 Feb 2012
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/phil408o-notes-6-feb-2012 2/3
The Superiority of Reason Thesis: The knowledge we gain in subject area S by intuition and
deduction or have innately is superior to any knowledge gained by sense experience.
Empiricism:
Empiricists endorse the following claim for some subject area.
The Empiricism Thesis: We have no source of knowledge in S or for the concepts we use in S
other than sense experience.
Sense experience is our only source of ideas.
It entails that knowledge can only be gained, if at all , by experience.
Good philosophy is empirically informed
Psychology doesn’t split from philosophy until 19th century
Early 20th century: Freud and Behaviourism
-discovers the unconscious
Behaviourism - mind is best studied via observable behaviour
Chomsky @ center of cognitive revolution @ end of 20th century
Mind is like a computer
Description vs explanation
Explaining involves: why is it this way and not some other possible way?
Fodor, Jerry: “The Modularity of Mind”
Muller-Lyer Illusion
Moral faculty = moral module?
Language module isn’t borne out by stroke victims: this is testable, right?
Positing modules in the mind is motivated by the desire to get a set of phenomena into the right
shape so that you can start reducing things to neuro-physiology.
Faculty = a much more abstract concept
Brains are innately constrained = Explanations are all about constraints
Cognitive faculty = a set of constraints that characterize its operation
8/2/2019 PHIL408O Notes - 6 Feb 2012
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/phil408o-notes-6-feb-2012 3/3
Carroll, Sean - Endless Forms Most Beautiful
Faculty/ module distinction “faculty disputes” by John Collins “Mind & Language” 2004
Rationalism doesn’t adequately account for correlation between our mind’s conception and the
real world
Maybe we construct the truth?
Epistemologically constrained version of truth