Upload
cora-megan-miles
View
216
Download
3
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
What have we been What have we been doing?doing?In the fall of
2010 a group was selected to study the changing national scene focusing on teacher performance and student achievement…
Who was involved?Who was involved?
The Task Force was comprised of approximately 60 representatives from a wide range of stakeholder groups…
Stakeholder GroupsStakeholder Groups Professional
Standards Board Legislators Technical
assistance/research consultants– NECC– REL-NEI
NH DOE
Educators in the field– Teachers– Principals– Superintendent
s Higher Education
– Teacher Prep Programs
Parents School Board
Members
Why?Why? To provide a common definition
of effective teaching for all schools; Identify different teaching frameworks
that are research-based and are critical components to a fair and equitable teaching evaluation process;
Develop a system of preparation, professional development, and continuous advancement of teachers to impact student learning (amended to “develop a framework”); and
Develop a set of recommendations that will lead to a recommended framework focused on teacher effectiveness and student achievement…
How was it done?How was it done?
Meet with experts in the field studying teacher effectiveness and student achievement.
Review the research literature in detail to determine the validity of studies and identify how other states are viewing teacher effectiveness.
Build consensus through stakeholder participation. Develop a New Hampshire Blueprint for identifying
the critical elements of effective teaching. Identify teacher effectiveness and evaluation
models from NH schools and districts that can be replicated.
Utilize national experts and technical assistance providers in strategic and focused ways…
Strategies
Standards and Competencies for Students and
Teachers P-K-16
STATE AND LOCAL
LEADERSHIP AND
GOVERNANCEEnabling Policies
Assessment Systems
Internal Collaborative Cultures
External Partnerships
TeacherPrepara
tion
Induction-
with-Mentor
ing
Professional
Development
Teacher
Evaluation
New New Hampshire Hampshire Blueprint Blueprint for for Effective Effective TeachingTeaching
What was What was the the outcome?outcome?
PILOT PHASE(Framework for
Teachers)
Process Bi-monthly meetings — November 2010 -
May 2011. Sub-committee work in four key areas:– Teacher preparation,– Induction/mentoring,– Professional development, and– Teacher evaluation.
Task Force planning team tracked progress and designed meeting agendas.
How was it planned?How was it planned?
What was done?What was done? NH “models of practice”
in the area of teacher effectiveness
Research on teacher effectiveness and teacher evaluation — REL-NEI, NECC, AACC, TQ Center
National experts — Laura Goe, Charlotte Danielson, Stanley Rabinowitz
What’s in place?What’s in place?Current Status:Effective Teaching definedRecommendations and Questions to consider developed in concert with the “Blueprint”Draft report developedReviewed by the National Teacher Quality CenterReport finalized.Phase II team formedDistribution to New Hampshire Educators (October 7, 2011)
New Hampshire New Hampshire StrategiesStrategies
Pilot Program with SIG schools
Non-SIG school participation
Research methodology developed
Connect teacher effectiveness system to new Accountability System
Work with Accountability Task Force to Identify measures schools are using to measure student growth
Connect student growth to “Growth Model”
Continue identifying effective teacher evaluation strategies in N.H.
Phase II – that’s Phase II – that’s you.you. Task Force Members led
by the State Consortium on Education Effectiveness (SCEE) group and the Task Force Planning Committee
Additional input from Leader Effectiveness Task
Force Accountability Task Force Council for Teacher
Education Professional Standards
Board Institutes of Higher
Education Group Learning Forward Professional Development
Centers Next Generation Learning NH ASCD Data Modeling Group DOE
Further Refinement ofStudent Measures
Implementationof Pilot
Monthly Task ForceWork Sessions
Phase IIPhase IIChallengesChallenges
Professional Development and
Training of Teachers and Evaluators
NH S.I.G. SchoolsOther Districts
NH Task ForceOn Effective Teaching
CHARGE:Pilot NH Blueprint
For Effective Teaching
2011
CHARGE:Identify Student
Measuresof Teaching
Effectiveness
2012
From “Measurement Issues and Assessment for Teaching Quality, Drew H. Gitomer, editorChapter 8: Measuring Instruction for Teacher Learningby Mary Kay Stein and Lindsay Clare Matsumura
From “Measurement Issues and Assessment for Teaching Quality, Drew H. Gitomer, editorChapter 7: Mapping the Terrain of Teacher Quality by Arturo Pacheco
From “Measurement Issues and Assessment for Teaching Quality, Drew H. Gitomer, editorChapter 6: Approximations of Teacher Quality and Effectivenessby Mitchell D. Chester and Susan Tave Zelman
An Example: