Upload
petermr
View
220
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/14/2019 Pharmaceutical Journal Article SSTI
1/7
CLINICA
LFOCUS
Vol 1 January 2009 Clinical Pharmacist 13
By R A Seaton, DTM&H, FRCP(Edin)
Skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) comprise an
important and diverse group of anatomically and
aetiologically distinct infections. In UK hospitals,
34% of patients receive treatment for SSTI. Of these,
47% receive intravenous (IV) therapy, accountingfor 16% of all IV antibiotic-treated patients.1 Infections of
the skin and subcutaneous tissues account for around 176
admission per 100,000 of the UK population.2
Since the anatomical site, severity, associated co-
morbidity and aetiology vary, the clinical team managing
patients in hospital is likely to include a variety of
healthcare professionals in both medical and surgical
specialties. This review focuses on important bacterial
SSTIs seen in UK hospital practice.
In terms of clinical features and classification, SSTIs
may be defined by their involvement of deep structures, by
associated risk factors and by their microbiology (see Box
1, p15).
Superficial SSTIsFor people who develop superficial SSTIs, the causative
organisms are usually Staphylococcus aureusand Streptococcus
pyogenes.
Impetigo is a superficial SSTI rarely associated withsystemic upset or extensive skin involvement and more
commonly seen in children and young adults. Discrete,
multiple lesions usually occur on the face or extremities
that are either vesicular-purulent bullous or papular in
appearance. Yellow or brown crusting is characteristic.
Occasionally, secondary cellulitis can occur.
Folliculitis, furuncles and carbuncles comprise arange of superficial infections involving hair follicles.
Folliculitis consists of superficial epidermal inflammation
around the follicles; furuncles are small abscesses which
may coalesce to form larger carbuncles, usually on the
neck.
Cellulitis and erysipelas are pathologically distinctdermal infections comprising the most common SSTIs
that require admission to hospital and IV antibiotic
therapy. Both are diffuse, spreading, superficial infections
without underlying suppurative foci in muscle or fascia
and without associated necrosis.Characterised by heat, erythema, induration and
localised tenderness, there may also be an orange skin
appearance, due to superficial oedema surrounding hair
follicles which remain tethered to underlying dermis.
Blisters or bullae may also occur (Figure 1, p15).
Erysipelas involves the upper dermis and is raised
above surrounding skin with a well demarcated edge
There is a wide range of skin and soft tissue infections with a variety of risk factors and causes. This
article focuses on the diagnosis and treatment of some of these infections
Skin and soft tissue infectiond iagno s is and m anag em ent
Staphylococcus aureusbacteria (coloured scanning electron micrograph)
Andrew Seaton is consultant in infectious diseasesand general medicine at the Brownlee Centre,
Gartnavel General Hospital, Glasgow.
Skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) encompass a broad range of
infections with a variety of risk factors and causes. Careful assessment of
risk factors, severity markers and co-morbidities will inform the most
appropriate therapy.
Key clinical decisions include route of administration of therapy,switching from IV to oral therapy, adjunctive measures and suitability for
outpatient management. Outpatient parenteral therapy is a viable option
for ambulant patients with moderate SSTI requiring IV therapy and without
risk factors for severe disease or unstable co-morbidities.
GopalM
urti|SPL
SUMMARY
Forpersonaluseonly.Nottob
ereproducedwithoutpermissionoftheeditor([email protected]
g.uk)
8/14/2019 Pharmaceutical Journal Article SSTI
2/7
CLINICA
LFOCUS
Vol 1 January 2009 Clinical Pharmacist 15
(Figure 2). Cellulitis involves deeper dermis and
subcutaneous fat, is not raised and is without a well
demarcated edge (Figure 3). Each may be accompanied by
a systemic inflammatory response and regional
lymphadenopathy is common. Infection occurs following
a minor skin breach, for example an insect bite (morecommon in the summer months). It may also complicate
Tinea pedisor paronychia. Risk of infection is increased in
immunocompromised patients, following trauma or
surgery, in those with diabetes mellitus or lymphoedema,
and in the morbidly obese (Figure 4, p16).
Necrotising SSTIsNecrotising infection of the skin and soft tissue is severe
and life-threatening, with a systemic inflammatory
response, involvement of deep tissues, including
underlying fascia or muscle, and associated tissue
destruction.
Necrotising infections can be distinguished from moresuperficial infections by the presence of a combination of
the following clinical signs: severe, constant pain;
blistering and bruising; oedema beyond the margin of the
erythema; localised skin anaesthesia; gas in the tissues;
systemic inflammatory response and multi-organ failure;
and rapidly evolving and spreading infection.
Necrotising fasciitis involves the tissues deep to thedermis and superficial to the muscle. Infection moves
along these planes, extending well beyond the superficial
signs of infection, and usually occurs as a direct
consequence of more superficial infection.
Underlying tissues often feel wooden and there maybe a dusky discoloration to the skin (Figures 5a and 5b,
p16).
Myositis involves muscle and two distinct groups arerecognised: anaerobic streptococcal myositis, usually
occurring following surgery or open trauma and involving
muscles and fascial planes; and pyomyositis, which is pus
within an individual muscle group, usually presenting
with localised pain, muscle spasm and fever.
Synergistic necrotising cellulitis is a necrotising softtissue infection involving muscle groups, in addition to
superficial skin and fascia (Figure 6, p17).
Fournier gangrene involves the perineum and genitalia,usually in patients with underlying disease, particularly
diabetes mellitus. Onset is usually sudden but can be
insidious. An initial superficial focus of infection becomes
necrotic and spreads to deep tissues and along fascial
planes.
Clostridial myonecrosis (gas gangrene) is
characterised by severe localised pain, systemicinflammatory response and rapidly evolving skin changes
within 24 hours of trauma. Affected areas become tense,
fluid-filled blisters develop and gas is visible on plain
radiographs.
Spontaneous gangrene can complicate malignancy and
neutropenia, is usually blood-borne from a colonic focus
and occurs in the absence of trauma.
Microbiology and associated risk factorsIrrespective of site or severity, SSTIs are predominantly
caused by aerobic gram-positive cocci, in particular the
beta-haemolytic streptococci (notably S pyogenes) and S
aureus.3
Other micro-organisms are variably implicated
ure 1: Skin blistering in cellulitis. Typically seen
beta-haemolytic streptococcal infections
Figure 2: Facial erysipelas. Typical of
Streptococcus pyogenesinfection
Figure 3: Facial cellulitis with periorbital oedema
Box 1: Microbial causes of SSTI
CLINICAL PRESENTATION CAUSATIVE ORGANISMS
Impetigo, folliculitis, furunculosis, Staphylococcus aureusand Streptococcus
carbuncles, cellulitis and erysipelas pyogenes
Necrotising infections S aureus, S pyogenes, clostridial species, gram-negative organisms and polymicrobial species
Infections following human or S aureus, aerobic and anaerobic streptococci,
animal bites Fusobacteriumand Pasteurella spp;
capnocytophaga (in animals)
Surgical site infections S aureus, beta-haemolytic streptococci; genital
tract or abdominal surgery consider gram-
negatives and anaerobes
Infections in immunocompromised S aureus, S pyogenes, gram-negatives including
patients Pseudomonas aeroginosa, mycobacteria and fungi
Infections in parenteral drug users S aureus, beta-haemolytic streptococci, and
clostridial species
SSTI due to water exposure Vibrio vulnificus, Aeromonas hydrophiliaand
Mycobacterium marinum
Travel-related SSTI S aureus, S pyogenes, endemeic mycoses,
Mycobacterium ulcerans, Leishmaniaspp, and others
8/14/2019 Pharmaceutical Journal Article SSTI
3/7
CLINICAL
FOCUS
16 Clinical Pharmacist January 2009 Vol 1
depending on the nature of the SSTI and whether it is
healthcare-associated or community-acquired.
Surgical site infection usually occurs more than 48hours after an incision and is characterised by localised
wound-related erythema, heat, induration and purulentdischarge.
Involvement of deep structures should always be
considered and management depends on the surgical site.
In hospitals, S aureusdominates as a cause of surgical-site
infection4 (Figure 7, p17), with variable rates of meticillin
resistance (see accompanying article, p23).
Animal or human bites can result in infection, and thedepth and site of the bite is critical. Hand injuries are
common so attention should be paid to potential tendon
involvement and the maintenance of function. Therapy is
often pre-emptive in view of the high risks of loss of
function. Infections are polymicrobial, reflecting oralflora: S aureus, aerobic and anaerobic streptococci,
clostridial species, fusobacteria and gram-negative
bacteria. With animal bites Pasteurella spp and
capnocytophaga are also important.
Water exposure refers to water-related trauma (eg,coral or rock laceration) or contamination with water of
an open wound or sore. Both fresh and salinated water
harbour micro-organisms and individuals are at potential
risk of SSTI following such exposure. Vibrio vulnificus and
Aeromonas hydrophiliaare frequently responsible.
In hospitals some hydrophilic organisms such as
pseudomonas and stenotrophomonas can also causeSSTIs, particularly in compromised, post-operative
patients. Mycobacterium marinum infection (or fish tank
granuloma) most frequently occurs following a laceration
incurred when cleaning tropical fish tanks. Systemic
infection is unusual.
Parenteral drug users are an at-risk group for SSTIs.The full range of infections ranging from simple
injection-site abscesses to necrotising infections can be
seen in inner-city hospitals and clinics. Concomitant
blood-stream infection and venous thromboembolism is
not uncommon (Figure 8, p17).
Individuals are at risk through translocation ofcommensal skin organisms into the blood stream directly,
by use of contaminated heroin (usually with heat-resistant
organisms), or via contamination during drug preparation.
Gram-positive organisms, particularly S aureusand beta-
haemolytic streptococci, are usually implicated.
Clostridial species, particularly C perfringensand C novyi,
can cause devastating, rapidly progressive infections
associated with marked leucocytosis and systemic
inflammatory response.
Immunocompromised patients may develop SSTIs,with S aureus and S pyogenesas the predominant organisms
in this diverse patient group. Gram-negative organisms,including Pseudomonas aeroginosa, should be considered in
the context of neutropenia and line-related SSTI.
Fungal infections (eg, with Fusarium, Aspergillus or
Sporothrixspp) are less frequently seen, but may occur in
Figure 4: Progressive cellulitis due to group B streptococcus, complicating
lymphoedema and morbid obesity
Figure 5a: Necrotising fasciitis due to Streptococcus
pyogenesshowing blistering in lower leg
Figure 5b: Dusky skin discoloration extending over buttock
and flank indicating progressive infection
association with neutropenia, organ transplant or long-
term immunosuppressive therapy. Their presentation is
variable but may consist of papullar, erythematous or
purple eruptions with lymphatic spread or erythema and
skin ulceration. Fungal infections can occur either as a
primary complication or in the context of disseminated
infection with multi-organ involvement.Mycobacterial infections are uncommon and can be
indistinguishable from fungal infections but should be
considered in the same population.
Travel-related or tropical skin infections are notuncommon in migrants or people returning from abroad.
8/14/2019 Pharmaceutical Journal Article SSTI
4/7
8/14/2019 Pharmaceutical Journal Article SSTI
5/7
CLINICAL
FOCUS
18 Clinical Pharmacist January 2009 Vol 1
resuscitation and appropriate imaging, to delineate the
extent and nature of the infection. Frequent clinical
review and early surgical review are essential. For
patients with necrotising fasciitis, aggressive surgical
debridement akin to radical tumour resection, with wide
margins of excision of affected tissues, can be life saving although limb amputation or extensive skin and tissue
loss is frequent and mortality high (>60%). Normal
human immunoglobulin infusion for 72 hours is used
by many infectious diseases physicians in these
circumstances in an attempt to neutralise streptococcal
toxic shock protein.7
Surgical review should also be sought for SSTIs
occurring from a surgical procedure and for all patients
with a significant bite or trauma. Careful attention should
be paid towards the potential for involvement of deep
structures and prosthetic implants.
Outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapyOutpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT) is ameans to facilitate safe and effective delivery of parenteral
antimicrobial therapy, in a non-inpatient setting, to
patients for whom IV treatment is the most appropriate
choice (Box 2). For greatest efficiency, OPAT should be
available soon after presentation to avoid admission or
plan early discharge.
Different models exist: an integrated healthcare at
home service can manage SSTIs in conjunction with
other non-infectious conditions, including deep-vein
thrombosis, and takes place via acute admissions unit; a
comprehensive infection service utilises infection
specialists (usually infectious diseases physicians),
overseeing the management of a range of infectious
conditions in the hospital outpatient setting.8 In the US,
OPAT is often delivered in the community, usually by a
contracted private healthcare provider in an infusion
centre, overseen by an infection specialist.9 There are
advantages and disadvantages to each model and they can
be adapted to local economics and strategies.Contraindications to OPAT include uncontrolled local
infection or sepsis syndrome, unstable co-morbidities,
unsuitability for self-care or lack of appropriate home
Box 2: Advantages of OPAT services for SSTI
Development of an outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT) service
for patients with skin and soft tissue infections has the potential to:
Provide patients with choice in how and where their care is delivered
Promote more rapid return to normal activities (including work) for
patients
Simplify the patient journey by
a) avoiding admission to hospital for some
b) reducing the duration of hospital stay for others
Improve and streamline infection management in a broad population
of patients dispersed across many clinical areas
Reduce bed-occupancy pressures in acute clinical areas
Promote early discharge to accommodate increasing numbers of acute
admissions and elective surgery patients
Published guidance is deliberately non-prescriptive
with respect to antibiotic choice, in part reflecting these
complexities, but also because SSTI clinical trials
typically exclude the most severely ill patients and are
powered only to show non-inferiority between agents.5,6
For patients admitted to hospital requiring IVtreatment and where fully sensitive organisms are
isolated or suspected and there is no history of penicillin
allergy narrow-spectrum beta-lactam antibiotics such
as benzylpenicillin (for beta-haemolytic streptococci) and
flucloxacillin (for both beta-haemolytic streptococci and
staphylococci) remain the antibiotics of choice. It is the
authors practice to use flucloxacillin monotherapy as
first-line treatment for non-allergic patients unless MRSA
or polymicrobial infection is suspected following
assessment (see Box 1, p15).
When oral therapy is indicated flucloxacillin is
appropriate, and for the beta-lactam-sensitive patient
erythromycin or clarithromycin, clindamycin, ordoxycycline (except during pregnancy or lactation and for
children) are efficacious. For patients with beta-lactam
sensitivity requiring IV therapy, vancomycin or
clindamycin is usually selected.
For adults with severe SSTIs requiring IV therapy, it is
the authors practice, following administration of an initial
IV dose, to use a continuous infusion of either
flucloxacillin (eg, 12g/24h) or vancomycin (eg, 2g/24h), to
provide the maximum time for the antibiotic to be above
the minimum inhibitory concentration for the suspected
organism. Therapeutic drug monitoring should be
performed for patients receiving vancomycin, aiming for a
random-level concentration of 1015mg/L, with higherconcentrations appropriate for patients with MRSA
bacteraemia.
For patients with necrotising or rapidly progressive
infections, IV clindamycin at a dose of 900mg eight-
hourly is added to enhance cover against toxigenic S
pyogenes. Clindamycin reduces the production of
streptococcal toxic shock protein by its action on bacterial
mitochondria. It is also active when beta-lactams are
rendered ineffective, which occurs during the static
growth phase of streptococci when penicillin binding
protein production is halted.
If polymicrobial infection is suspected the spectrum of
antibiotic cover should be expanded. Typically, forinfected bites co-amoxiclav (IV or oral) is appropriate.
Doxycyline is a suitable oral alternative if the patient is
allergic to beta-lactams. Gentamicin, vancomycin and
metronidazole can be considered as alternatives, but
specialist advice should be sought and therapy adjusted
depending on microbiological results.
Adjunctive measuresAll patients with lower-limb SSTI should be assessed for
signs of T pedis, which should be treated with topical
imidazole antifungal (eg, miconazole) or terbinafine. For
severe tinea infections oral terbinafine may be required.
Rest and leg elevation are also important in speedingrecovery from lower-limb SSTI.
Severe SSTIs should be managed in a high-
dependency setting with broad antibiotic therapy, fluid
8/14/2019 Pharmaceutical Journal Article SSTI
6/7
8/14/2019 Pharmaceutical Journal Article SSTI
7/7
CLINICAL
FOCUS
Antibiotic prophylaxis should be considered for patients
requiring repeated IV treatment or hospital admission.
Because streptococcal species are the most frequently
recurring organisms, twice-daily phenoxymethylpenicillin
prophylaxis could be considered. Other options include
doxycycline, co-trimoxazole and erythromycin. For patientswith recurrent, rapidly progressive, severe infections it is
the authors practice to give (with counselling) take-home
antibiotics for use at the earliest sign of infection.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The author would like to thank Kirsty
Lattka from medical illustration services at Gartnavel General
Hospital, Glasgow, for arranging the photographs published.
References1 Seaton RA, Nathwani D, Burton P, et al. Point prevalence survey of
antibiotic use in Scottish hospitals utilising the Glasgow Antimicrobial
Audit Tool (GAAT). International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents
2007;29:6939.
2 ISD Scotland. Scottish inpatient, day case and outpatient statistics.
www.isdscotland.org/isd/4334.html (accessed 9 December 2008).
3 Carratal J, Rosn B, Fernndez-Sab N, et al. Factors associated with
complications and mortality in adult patients hospitalized for infectious
cellulitis. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious
Diseases 2003;22:1517.
4 Kirkland KB, Briggs JP, Trivette SL, et al. The impact of surgical site
infections in the 1990s: attributable mortality, excess length of
hospitalization and extra costs. Infection Control and Hospital
Epidemiology 1999;20:72530.
5 Stevens DL, Bisno AL, Chambers HF, et al. Practice guidelines for thediagnosis and management of skin and soft tissue infections. Clinical
Infectious Diseases 2005;41:1373406.
6 Eron LJ, Lipsky BA, Low DE, et al. Managing skin and soft tissue
infections: expert panel recommendations on key decision points. Journal
of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 2003;52(s1):i317.
7 Darenberg J, Ihendyane N, Sjlin J, et al. Intravenous immunoglobulin G
therapy in streptococcal toxic shock syndrome: a European randomized,
double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Clinical Infectious Diseases
2003;37:33340.
8 Seaton RA, Bell, E, Gourlay Y, et al. Nurse-led management of
uncomplicated cellulitis in the community; evaluation of a protocol
incorporating intravenous ceftriaxone. Journal of Antimicrobial
Chemotherapy 2005;55:7647.
9 Tice AD, Rehm SJ, Dalovisio JR, et al. Practice guidelines for outpatient
parenteral antimicrobial therapy. Clinical Infectious Diseases
2004;38:165172.
10 Scully BE, Fu KP, Neu HC. Pharmacokinetics of ceftriaxone after
intravenous infusion and intramuscular injection. American Journal of
Medicine 1984;77:1126.
22 Clinical Pharmacist January 2009 Vol 1