PetGeo

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

PetGeo4

Citation preview

  • 7/18/2019 PetGeo

    1/26

    Stacking and Velocity Analysis

    The data are stacked to emulate a

    common source receiver geometry. Data traces from common midpoints are

    added to improve the signal to noise ratio. To do this, the seismic velocity must first

    be found.

  • 7/18/2019 PetGeo

    2/26

    Stacking creates a seismic section that emulates

    a common source-receiver geometry that can beinterpreted.

    Shot and receiver in same spot!

    Works best if layer is flat.

    The CMP section

  • 7/18/2019 PetGeo

    3/26

    Constant Velocity Stack

    Lets assume the rocks all have the same

    seismic velocity constant velocity assumption. What is the travel time for a raypath bouncing off

    a flat layer at depth?

    x

    d

  • 7/18/2019 PetGeo

    4/26

    x

    d

    The hyperbolic travel-time2

    2 2 2xTotal raypath distance = 2 +d (2 )2

    x d

    = +

    0

    dwhere t =2 is the zero offset traveltime

    v

    2 2 2

    2 2 201 2Total raypath traveltime = x +(2d)

    vx d x td v d = + = +

    2

    2

    0

    xt t

    v

    = +

    So the normal move out equation is

  • 7/18/2019 PetGeo

    5/26

    HyperbolicMoveout

    Near shot trace,

    intercept is t0

    Hyperbolas flatten

    at longer times

    x

    Moveout is the way thereflection appears at later

    times for more distant traces.

    This is the equation of a

    hyperbola. with its apex at t=t0

    2

    2

    0

    xt t

    v

    = +

  • 7/18/2019 PetGeo

    6/26

    HyperbolicMoveout

    The amount of moveoutdetermines what velocity

    should be used.

    This is called thestacking velocity

    The best stacking velocity

    is the one that producesthe most coherent

    reflections after stack!

    Near shot trace,

    intercept is t0

    Hyperbolas flatten

    at longer times

    x

  • 7/18/2019 PetGeo

    7/26

    NMO correction

    The travel time is:

    So, to correct, we adjust each point on

    each trace by:

    2

    2

    0

    xt t

    v

    = +

    2

    2

    0 0 0( ) x

    t t x t t t v

    = = +

  • 7/18/2019 PetGeo

    8/26

    NMO correction

    t

  • 7/18/2019 PetGeo

    9/26

    NMO correction

  • 7/18/2019 PetGeo

    10/26

    Velocity varies with depth

    If the velocity varies with depth, we must

    adjust the stacking velocity to vary as afunction of time: v(t)

    We still use a modified stacking equation:

    2

    20

    ( )xt t

    v t = +

  • 7/18/2019 PetGeo

    11/26

    Stacking velocity

    Stacking velocity is the best apparent

    velocity to stack with. It depends on all the layer velocities above

    the reflector so it is an average velocitythat turns out to be the rms velocity

    2

    10

    i

    1

    where t is the two-way travel time in layer i

    N

    stack rms i i

    i

    v v v t t =

    = =

  • 7/18/2019 PetGeo

    12/26

    Dipping layer velocity

    x

  • 7/18/2019 PetGeo

    13/26

    Dipping layer velocity

    Modify velocity by

    dividing by cos

    22

    2

    0

    cosxt t v

    = +

  • 7/18/2019 PetGeo

    14/26

    3D dipping layer velocity

    2 2

    /(1 sin cos )stackingv v =

    Must modify even more if layer is

    dipping in 3D

  • 7/18/2019 PetGeo

    15/26

    Finding the stacking velocity

    If we know the velocities and dips, we can

    find the nmo correction for the reflectionhyperbola

    But we dont know either the velocities ordips.

    We try different stacking velocities and use

    the one that works best.

  • 7/18/2019 PetGeo

    16/26

    Methods to find stacking velocity

    Try different stacking velocities on cmp

    gathers and pick the best one Try different stacking velocities on cmp

    stacked section and pick the best one Try measuring the coherency of the

    reflections for different stacking velocities

    and plot them

  • 7/18/2019 PetGeo

    17/26

    Effect of stacking velocity on cmp

    gathers

  • 7/18/2019 PetGeo

    18/26

    Effect of stacking velocity on cmp

    gathers

  • 7/18/2019 PetGeo

    19/26

    Effect of stacking velocities on

    stacked section

  • 7/18/2019 PetGeo

    20/26

    Constant velocity stacks

  • 7/18/2019 PetGeo

    21/26

    Velocity spectrums

    We can estimate the stacked trace strength for

    different stacking velocities and then plot them To do this for a specific cmp gather

    Take gather and make nmo correction for a specific

    velocity Measure the rms (root-mean-square) of cmp gather at

    specific times

    Do this for different velocities

    Plot these up and contour

  • 7/18/2019 PetGeo

    22/26

    Velocity

    spectrum

    For each velocity

    NMO is applied to flatten reflectors

    RMS strength is found at each time

    strength is plotted and contoured

  • 7/18/2019 PetGeo

    23/26

    Velocity spectrum

  • 7/18/2019 PetGeo

    24/26

    Velocity spectrum

  • 7/18/2019 PetGeo

    25/26

    Velocity spectrum for different line

    lengths

  • 7/18/2019 PetGeo

    26/26

    Velocity analysis processing

    The velocityanalysis is

    typically carriedout for every100 or somidpoints and

    then the modelis interpolatedto get aregionally

    varying modelthat is used tostack the cmpdata.