Upload
jean-webster
View
215
Download
2
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Persuading people
01.09.2013 - 02.01.2014
Using technology to change health behaviour
Group: i901e13
Lars Christian Vagner Lichon
Umachanger Brinthaparan
Nirojan Srikandarajah
Stephan Vinther Smedegaard Rasmussen
Informatics, 9th semester (Pre-specialisation)
2/50
Table of content
Introduction
Litterature revie
w
Design
Field
study
Findings
Conclusion
Introduction Litterature review Design Field study Findings Conclusion
3/50
Introduction
Introduction Litterature review Design Field study Findings Conclusion
Introduction The University of Melbourne, Australia
01.09.2013 – 02.01.2014
Ongoing research Social Networks Sites for
Ambivalent Socialisers: The Case of Smoking Cessation
With Dr Bernd Ploderer, Dr Wally Smith, Dr Greg Wadley & Dr Jon Pearce
Collaboration with
Introduction Litterature review Design Field study Findings Conclusion
5/50
The case of smoking cessation The rate of people killed by smoking is higher than people killed in car accidents, alcohol and other drugs combined (Victoria, Australia)
Nearly 6 million killed each year
Health issues Cancer, lung disease, heart disease and poor blood circulation
Economy within social welfare
Governments and anti-smoking organizations
Using persuasive technologies
Introduction Litterature review Design Field study Findings Conclusion
6/50
Problem area Gather and discuss knowledge on health behaviour changing research
Applying a mobile technology probe to persuade users
The study introduces: 3 content types: Stories, Tips and Motivators 2 sources of recommendation: Experts and Community.
Introduction Litterature review Design Field study Findings Conclusion
7/50
• Understanding• Litterature Review
Analysis
Litterature review
Introduction Litterature review Design Field study Findings Conclusion
Themes
Introduction Litterature review Design Field study Findings Conclusion
Major themes HCI papers
Mobile platform
Tracking/Self-monitoring
Reminding/Interrupting
Games
Social networks/Social support online
Use of agents
Guidelines/Strategies
Evaluating health behaviour change systems
Total: x56
10/50
Tracking/Self-monitoring Focus on physical activity and healthy eating
Manual data entries
Auto data tracking
Challenges Using smartphone sensors Using the data in new ways
Introduction Litterature review Design Field study Findings Conclusion
11/50
Social Network / Social Support Online Tracking health data
Sharing personal health information
Storytelling seems to be unexplored
Using existing SN or create your own?
Introduction Litterature review Design Field study Findings Conclusion
12/50
Reminding/Interrupting SMS messages
Alarm/push notifications
Only few studies have tried to explore this area
Tailored, personalized messages are most effective
Polite vs Annoying Interruption
Introduction Litterature review Design Field study Findings Conclusion
13/50
Design
Introduction Litterature review Design Field study Findings Conclusion
Research design
Principles of persuasion
Social proofCommunity
ExpertiseExpert
Stories StoriesRecomended based on community
StoriesRecomended based on expert
Tips TipsRecomended based on community
TipsRecomended based on expert
Motivators MotivatorsRecomended based on community
MotivatorsRecomended based on expert
Introduction Litterature review Design Field study Findings Conclusion
15/50
http://tiny.cc/Quitty
Introduction Litterature review Design Field study Findings Conclusion
16/50
Field study
Introduction Litterature review Design Field study Findings Conclusion
The study Survey
3 weeks of use
The participants commenced their participation at various points
1 push message each day
3 types of content each day
Randomized recommenders
Data collected:
Clicks
Ratings and comments
Introduction Litterature review Design Field study Findings Conclusion
18/50
Participants
23 24 26 31 33 37 38 42 36 37 47
34avg
Total of 11Average nicotine dependence: 2Most of them are at least at the stage of ”Preparing to quit”
4 (0)2 (1- 2 = very low dependence)2 (3 = low to mod dependence)2 (4 = moderate dependence)1 (5+ = high dependence)
Introduction Litterature review Design Field study Findings Conclusion
19/50
Interviews Pilot interview
10 interviews (all transcribed)
Each interview lasting approximately 45 minutes
Gathering impressions of the system
Discussing comments and ratings with participants
Introduction Litterature review Design Field study Findings Conclusion
20/50
Click icon to add picture
CodingParticipant/Researcher Umachanger Nirojan Lars StephanP1 X X P2 X XP3 X X P4 X X P5 X X P6 X X P7 X XP8 X XP9 X XP10 X X
Introduction Litterature review Design Field study Findings Conclusion
22/50
Click icon to add picture
Findings
Introduction Litterature review Design Field study Findings Conclusion
8 major themes Content types
Gain and loss framed content
Genuine/fake
Sources of recommendation
Text messages
Relatability and tailoring
Tracking
Social
Introduction Litterature review Design Field study Findings Conclusion
25/50
The app Easily accesible on phone:
”I prefer it on the phone. It is like maybe if you are in a bar and you like, you can actually ask, what do I do if I actually see someone smoking and I am in craving….”
Keep it a private:
”Qutting smoking is a private thing.... And having an app on your phone means you can kind of look at it, secretly”
Introduction Litterature review Design Field study Findings Conclusion
26/50
Content preference
6
3
3
Content preference
TipsStoriesMotivators
Introduction Litterature review Design Field study Findings Conclusion
27/50
Content Most participants prefered gain framed content rather then loss framed content
“That makes me happy. Positive future. Like the light at the end of the tunnel.”
“So yeah, I would much prefer something that got that positive “this good thing is gonna happen if you do this”.”
Some participants also liked a mix of both or purely loss framed content
6 participants wanted to get more information than what was provided by the app on a daily basis.
Introduction Litterature review Design Field study Findings Conclusion
28/50
Condescending Content 4 participants felt some of the content was condescending
“…and that was as well condescending that I felt like. Yeah, you know having tried it or like, you know “Good little smokie you get a sweetie”
“…almost a little condescending towards smokers”
Introduction Litterature review Design Field study Findings Conclusion
29/50
Fake/Genuine Content 5 participants talked about the importance of the content feeling genuine
3 participants said the stories in the app seemed fake
“some of the stories I found to be, almost to the degree that they read as if they were just made up. “Today I am going to quit, I’ve decided I am going to quit today”
“I don’t know if the stories were actually true and comes from people who try to quit or have quit, but they just sort of seemed a bit artificial.”
Introduction Litterature review Design Field study Findings Conclusion
30/50
Stories Personal experiences and stories ”So you know, I can’t relate to this, but, I’m listening to someone,
whose not trying to scare me into something, ‘I’m not trying to do this’, just telling me her experience, and sharing that with me, and encouraging me to go on my own journey. So, I respond to that positively.”
Opportunity to relate
Can offer hope (small hopes helps)
Offers emotional content
Bad grammar made some take them less seriously
Introduction Litterature review Design Field study Findings Conclusion
31/50
Stories× Unrelatable
× Scare tactics does not work
× Unrealistic”Just sort of, not like ‘I could and it was so easy, I can’t believe I didn’t do it sooner’, because it is not realistic to me. I have tried to quit a lot of times and that is not easy at all.”
“All that all of a sudden I felt beautiful after getting up… it’s, it’s, it’s too… I am not denying it’s legitimize, it’s just too over the top exaggeration.”
Introduction Litterature review Design Field study Findings Conclusion
Grab your attention Offer something different Stories should describe the struggle Explain the process of quitting Have to be edgy Inspiring
Real Emotional
Good Bad
32/50
TipsEasy implementation “Probably a tip might not work for everybody. When it comes to tips and it comes to quitting
smoking I think really basic things are quite good, because you are not necessarily… you don’t necessarily think of them, you don’t necessarily think “If I really want a cigarette, If I just takes some deep breaths and just wait that minute, that might help”, you don’t necessarily actively think that.”
Consice
Practical
Simple
Reinforcing behaviors “I suppose its something that you kind of thought of yourself and its also really forcing it. To
change your routine, go for a walk, take your mind off it, do something else. Most of the time you have a cigarette because you’re bored as well. So, its kind of reinforcing behaviours that you already know you should be doing, but to actually see it written there as well it also reiterates it.”
Another focus: Getting healthy again
Introduction Litterature review Design Field study Findings Conclusion
33/50
Tips× Not much detail
× No relevance× Not seeing it happening in their life
× Not on a psychological level
× Not easy to implement“You know and I mean once you go and do it, you do feel better, but you know, that fairly common tip “Just go for a walk or something” initially when you quit smoking, that’s the last thing you feel like doing, because you don’t feel right. Tips like that it’s like “no! I am not gonna go and do any exercise, this is hard!”
× Makes you think of smoking
Introduction Litterature review Design Field study Findings Conclusion
Easily implemented Realistic Practical Instructions and examples Relatable/achievable Useful reminder Original thoughts
Good Bad
34/50
Motivators Factual
Money is the biggest motivator
New knowledge
Helps on a subconscious level
Reminds of what you already know “A good motivator is things like knowing that, things I already
know that I sort of needs to be reminded of, if I quit smoking I could exercise more easily and I wouldn’t get puffed walking on the street or whatever.”
Introduction Litterature review Design Field study Findings Conclusion
35/50
Motivators× Should not be negative× Not motivating
× Cheesy
× Not long-term focused“15 years seems like a very long time, you know and to think like, it’s like in 15 years I will be 50 or something. It’s too far away, it’s not like… it’s kind of discouraging to think that I have done that much damage and that is gonna take that long to get any kind of benefit.”
× Not relatable
Introduction Litterature review Design Field study Findings Conclusion
Positive“The good ones I found in that were positive saying like “after a week..” or whatever you know “these are the health benefits” you know, the positive effects that you can get rather than the necessarily shock tactics.”
Gains Gives confidence Has to be up-to-date Relatable Short-term focused
Good Bad
36/50
Recommenders Recommenders were often not noticed due to the participant not reading the briefing well enough or due to app design.
Community generally preffered
Some noticed a difference between recommenders
46
Noticed the recommenders
YesNo
Introduction Litterature review Design Field study Findings Conclusion
37/50
Recommenders Most participants felt that people from the community had firsthand experience which they believed an expert did not have
“I don’t know if being expert requires having experience of reality addiction but it doesn’t necessarily imply that they have been through it. Maybe they know the facts and figures, but they haven’t lived it. Experts do not know how it is”
High expectations from an expert
“Um, I don’t know, I don’t think I’d respond to that in general; like first of all I’d say well, why do you include tips that aren’t going to work? You know, why aren’t they all just good tips then?”
Introduction Litterature review Design Field study Findings Conclusion
38/50
Text messages 9 participants said that the messages made them use the app more.
“These were good reminders. So If did not check it that day so it was like ‘oh yeah that’s what I have to do’. Because you do forget especially if you are busy or you are tired”.
8
2
Text messages
LikedDid not like
Introduction Litterature review Design Field study Findings Conclusion
39/50
Text messagesTexts from real people as motivation:
“After that, knowing that there were someone there, I found the messages encouraging and positive and friendly and that was my main motivation for checking the app, was getting that text message”
Reflecting on smoking habits:
”No, generally if I would receive a text message and I was having a cigarette or I just had a cigarette it would make me feel a little bit guilty”
Good to get notified at different times The messages should be interesting and funny
Introduction Litterature review Design Field study Findings Conclusion
40/50
Relatability All participants mentioned relatability as being important
Unrelatable content was disliked
”… I don’t care about 18 years old kids. I don’t care about this mother who has two kids and harming her to give up smoking. It’s not my life it is your life honey.”
55
Are demographics important?
YesNo
Introduction Litterature review Design Field study Findings Conclusion
41/50
Relatability 4 out of the 5 participants said that demographics weren’t a key factor to determine relatability.
In some cases it just had to be genuine
“Whilst a lot of them didn’t relate to me directly in anyway, because I don’t have children or I don’t have this… it felt genuine enough that I could access it. It felt that there was enough in it that I felt I could make an emotional connection, it wasn’t preachy, it wasn’t this… it was just an experience that someone was sharing. “
Introduction Litterature review Design Field study Findings Conclusion
42/50
TailoringQuitting Stage:
6 participants found this important
”Some of them I found frustrating to read, because, hearing other people having succeeded, when you are still struggling is difficult.”
Demographics:
2 participants found this important
”I think I would probably prefer not to know too much about them just so that I could relate it to myself.”
9
1Importance of tailoring
Would like some sort of tailoringDid not mention
Introduction Litterature review Design Field study Findings Conclusion
43/50
Tracking and feedback “If there was a way, that I could either log days or times that I haven’t had a cigarette or probably another way would be to log a time where I put off a cigarette when I have gone ‘rather than having a cigarette I am going to log into the system and say I am not having this cigarette now’…”
“If I have put off a certain amount each day then I was like getting a badge or a recognition or something back from the system”
64
Mentioned they wanted tracking
DidDid not
Introduction Litterature review Design Field study Findings Conclusion
44/50
Social Interest in interacting with other people through app Authors of stories/tips/motivators Experts (from Quit Vic) Better potential for using app as substitute for cigarette
Interest in being a parts of a community Online Meeting – Social activities
Share
Introduction Litterature review Design Field study Findings Conclusion
45/50
Reflected on smoking habits 7 participants had reflected on own smoking habits in one way or another
Thought about how he or she should really quit
3 participants had not reflected on own smoking habits The content in the app wasn’t ”news”
Introduction Litterature review Design Field study Findings Conclusion
46/50
Conclusion
Introduction Litterature review Design Field study Findings Conclusion
Conclusion Insight of the health behaviour change domain
Content types Small differences Elements necessary Tailoring and relatability
Genuine content
Gain/loss-framed content
Push messaging
Mobile platform
Introduction Litterature review Design Field study Findings Conclusion
48/50
Future work Tailored information
Push messaging
Content types
Social networks
Other domains
Longitudinal study – Quitty v2?
Theoretical/analytic study
Introduction Litterature review Design Field study Findings Conclusion
49/50
Now, let’s talk! ;)