14
Perspectives on Risk Perception Kathleen Tierney Natural Hazards Center University of Colorado at Boulder Was*IS Workshop July 18, 2007

Perspectives on Risk Perception

  • Upload
    santa

  • View
    75

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Perspectives on Risk Perception. Kathleen Tierney Natural Hazards Center University of Colorado at Boulder Was*IS Workshop July 18, 2007. Topics for Discussion. Myths and misconceptions about risk perception and assessment Factors affecting perceptions of risk - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Perspectives on Risk Perception

Perspectives on Risk Perception

Kathleen TierneyNatural Hazards Center

University of Colorado at BoulderWas*IS Workshop

July 18, 2007

Page 2: Perspectives on Risk Perception

Topics for Discussion

• Myths and misconceptions about risk perception and assessment

• Factors affecting perceptions of risk

During “normal,” non-crisis times

During emergencies

Page 3: Perspectives on Risk Perception

Myths and Misconceptions Regarding Risk Perception and

Assessment• Scientists and experts really

understand risk better than laypeople

• Lay perceptions of risk are erroneous and irrational

• Risk is a property inherent in things and processes (nuclear power, weather events, etc.)

Page 4: Perspectives on Risk Perception

Myths and Misconceptions

• Since risks can be compared in terms of their likelihood, members of the public are misguided, irrational, and worried about the wrong things, AKA,“Your chances of being struck by lightning are 5,000 times more likely than _____________ “

Page 5: Perspectives on Risk Perception

Alternative Ways of Viewing the Issue

• Risk is a social construct; both experts and the public act on the basis of socially-constructed claims, perceptions and assessments of risk

• Rather than being inherent in things and processes; risk is ultimately the consequence of societal and institutional dynamics. Thus risk is socially created (for more, see Tierney, “Toward a critical sociology of risk,” “From the margins to the mainstream? Disaster research at the crossroads”)

Page 6: Perspectives on Risk Perception

Alternative Ways of Viewing the Issue

• Because risks are socially constructed—that is, produced through social behavior, activities, and processes—risk comparisons are inherently invalid

Page 7: Perspectives on Risk Perception

Topics in the Study of Risk Perception:

Perceptions as Affected by• Perceived properties of different risks

(Slovic et al., “Rating the risks”)

• Mental models of risk and danger: How and why do we think we are we at risk? (Fischhoff, Morgan, and others)

• Cognitive heuristics: availability, anchoring, etc. (Slovic, Kunreuther, etc.)

Page 8: Perspectives on Risk Perception

Topics in the Study of Risk Perception:

Perceptions as Affected by• Personality characteristics and

world views:

FatalismLocus of control

Religiosity Risk avoidance, aversionInvincibility: “It won’t happen to me”

Page 9: Perspectives on Risk Perception

Topics in the Study of Risk Perception:

Perceptions as Affected by• Social relationships and network ties

• Information-seeking and information sources

• Socioeconomic characteristics of individuals and groups

GenderRace and ethnicitySocial class

Page 10: Perspectives on Risk Perception

Topics in the Study of Risk Perception:

Perceptions as Affected by

• Attitudes regarding the institutions that manage risk (Freudenburg and “recreancy”; “the white male effect”)

• Emotions (recent work by Slovic)

Page 11: Perspectives on Risk Perception

Topics in the Study of Risk Perception:

Perceptions as Affected by• Broader social processes:

Claimsmaking and social problem construction: interest groups, social movements, opinion leaders, lawmakersIssue attention cycles (Downs, “Up and down with ecology”)Media coverage and agenda-setting: the “rhetoric of risk”

Page 12: Perspectives on Risk Perception

Factors Affecting Risk Perception in Crisis Contexts

• Factors discussed earlier remain in play, influence both perceptions and behaviors during crisis events

• Additional factors come into play in crisis-specific contexts

Page 13: Perspectives on Risk Perception

Crisis-Specific Factors

• Normalcy bias• Prior experiences—or lack thereof• Environmental cues—or lack thereof• Milling and information-seeking• Properties of crisis-related messages:

clarity, specificity, consistency, certainty/uncertainty

• Properties of crisis-related message sources: trust vs. mistrust, credibility, believability, etc.

• Organizational, institutional responses

Page 14: Perspectives on Risk Perception

Exercise: Let’s discuss

• Avian flu

• Climate change

• Hurricane Katrina warning, evacuation

• Color-coded terrorism warnings

• Nuclear-related risks