Upload
rudolf-wheeler
View
214
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Perkins Accountability I Secondary and Postsecondary
OverviewSeptember 15, 2011
JoAnn Simser Susan Carter & Denise Roseland
State Director, CTE Office of the ChancellorSystem Director, Perkins Grant [email protected]
[email protected] [email protected]
Dan Smith Marlys BucherSupervisor, Adult and Career EducationCenter for Postsecondary Success
CTE Assessment/Evaluation Perkins CoordinatorCenter for Postsecondary Success
Slide 2
Review the secondary & postsecondary accountability indicators-- definitions-- data sources-- changes from previous year
Discuss the Local Negotiation Process for FY12 and FY13
Goals
Slide 3
Secondary Data Sources
Student Data Collected Annually
• Collected using EDEN (MCCC)
• Data match with the Office of Higher Education and with employment data from Department of Employment and Economic Development (DEED)
• Technical Skill Assessment results
Slide 4
Secondary Definitions
Secondary Participant: an individual who has participated in career and technical education courses in one career field for 100 hours or more
Secondary Concentrator: an individual who has participated successfully (passing grade) in career and technical education courses in one career field for 240 hours or more
Secondary Completer: a secondary concentrator who graduates from high school
Slide 5
Postsecondary Data Sources
• Student data from the system’s Integrated Student Record System (ISRS)
• Transfer data from the National Student Clearinghouse
• Employment information from the system Graduate Follow-up process and from DEED
• Licensing board and Technical Skill Assessment results
Slide 6
Postsecondary Data Structure
Minnesota is one of a handful of states to use a cohort model. The use of cohorts aligns with other system initiatives and reporting.
Spring 2010
Summer 2009
Spring 2011
Summer 2010
FY
09
Coh
ort
Perkins IV: Entry Cohort Reporting
Spring 2009
Fall 2009
Fall 2010
FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011
Spring 2010
Enter in Fall
2008
Spring 2011
Summer 2010
Spring 2009
Fall 2009
Fall 2010
Spring 2010
Spring 2011
Summer 2010
Enter in Spring 2009
Fall 2009
Fall 2010
Fall 2008
Enter in Summer
2008
Summer 2009
Summer 2009
For example, the FY2009-2011 cohort includes students entering in FY2009 and tracked for three years: 2009, 2010, and 2011
Slide 7
Postsecondary Definitions
Postsecondary Participant: a student taking a CTE course OR who has a Perkins eligible major
Postsecondary Concentrator: a student with a Perkins eligible major who has declared a CTE award (AAS, AS, Certificate, Diploma) and has earned 12 or more credits OR who has received an award in a short term Perkins eligible program (less than 12 credits)
Postsecondary Completer: a student who has received an award (AAS, AS, Certificate, Diploma) in a Perkins eligible program
Slide 8
Final Agreed Upon Performance Levels (FAUPL)
State Negotiated Performance Level – Accountable in Dec. 2011 CAR
State Negotiated Performance Level – Accountable in Dec. 2012 CAR
Definitions for Core Indicators State Negotiated Performance Levels
Definitions for Core Indicators
Indicator
Slide 9
1S1 Academic Attainment – Reading Language
Arts
1S2 Academic Attainment – Mathematics
Perkins Core Indicators Academic Attainment
Secondary
NonePostsecondary
Slide 10
2S1 Technical Skill Attainment
Perkins Core Indicators Technical Skill Attainment
Secondary
Postsecondary
1P1 Technical Skill Attainment
For more information on Technical Skills Assessments, visit:
http://www.cte.mnscu.edu/programs/mntsa.html
Slide 11
Career Pathways Currently Expected to Implement Technical Skill Assessments within courses under Perkins IV:
• AGRICULTURE, FOOD, & NATURAL RESOURCES Animal Systems Plant Systems
• ARTS, COMMUNICATIONS, & INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Printing Technology
Visual Arts
• BUSINESS, MANAGEMENT, & ADMINISTRATION
Accounting
Marketing Management
Merchandising
Professional Sales
• ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING, & TECHNOLOGY
Engineering and Technology
Facility and Mobile Equipment Maintenance
• HEALTH SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY
Diagnostic Services
Therapeutic Services
• HUMAN SERVICES
Early Childhood Education (Early Childhood Development and Services AND Teaching/Training (Birth to Gr 3)
Law Enforcement Services
• FOUNDATION KNOWLEDGE & SKILLS
Slide 12
3S1 School Completion
Perkins Core Indicators Completion/Graduation
Secondary
Postsecondary
2P1 Credential, Certificate or Degree
4S1 Student Graduation Rate (NCLB)
Slide 13
None
Perkins Core Indicators Student Retention or Transfer
Secondary
Postsecondary
3P1 Student Retention or Transfer
Slide 14
5S1 Placement
Perkins Core Indicators Placement
Secondary
Postsecondary
4P1 Student Placement
Slide 15
6S1 Nontraditional Participation
Perkins Core Indicators Nontraditional Participation
Secondary
Postsecondary
5P1 Nontraditional Participation
Slide 16
6S2 Nontraditional Completion
Perkins Core Indicators Nontraditional Completion
Secondary
Postsecondary
5P2 Nontraditional Completion
Slide 22
State and Local Negotiations
OVAE/State Negotiations
Evaluation of State Performance -- Improvement Plans
State/Local Consortia Negotiations
Evaluation of Local Performance -- Improvement Plans
Slide 23
OVAE/State Negotiation Process for 2012 and 2013
Initial OVAE Proposal for FY2012 and FY2013
March 2011
Deadline for State Response March 2011
OVAE Review of State Proposed Levels
April – June 2011
Final FAUPL (Final Agreed Upon Performance Levels)
June 2011
Evaluation of Performance 2012 & 2013 CAR
Slide 24
State/Local Consortia Negotiation Process for FY2012 Targets
Target Date
Development of State Proposed Targets
September 2011
Distribution of Proposed Targets to Local Consortia
October 18, 2011
Accountability Workshop OverviewSecondary Postsecondary
September 15, 2011September 22, 2011September 29, 2011
Consortia Responses Due November 16, 2011
Initial State Response November 29, 2011
Negotiations Completed December 9, 2011
Evaluation of Performance January 2013
Slide 25
Negotiating Your Targets
Review the proposed targets
Look at your data
– trends/preliminary data if available
Discuss the targets with your partners
– any changes in policy or practice that may affect
performance outcomes?
Understand the context and rationale for the proposed targets• Expectation of continuous improvement at the state and
local level
• Need for the state to be able to meet state targets negotiated with OVAE
Slide 26
Negotiating Your Targets
Determine if you will accept the proposed targets or will propose alternatives.
If you accept the state proposals--• Return the Negotiated Performance for
FY12-13 form
• Include BOTH secondary and postsecondary signatures
If you don’t accept the state proposals--• Notify the state
• Submit alternative target(s) along with the rationale for the proposed alternative(s).
Slide 27
Factors in State Review of Consortia Proposed Targets
Rationale provided by the consortium
Trend data
Impact of proposed alternatives on the ability of the state to meet the state negotiated target
Slide 28
Improvement Plans
The language in the Act regarding improvement plans and the withholding of funds is very similar for states and local recipients.
Section123(a)(1): State Improvement Plan
Section 123(a)(3)(A): Withholding State Funds
Section123(b)(2): Local Improvement Plan
Section 123(b)(4)(A): Withholding State Funds
State Local
Slide 29
State Improvement Plan Requirement
…fail to meet at least 90 percent of an agreed upon State adjusted level of performance for any of the core indicators……develop and implement a program improvement plan (with special consideration to performance gaps within subgroups) …during the first program year succeeding the program year for which the state failed to meet the performance level.
Section 123(a)(1)–Failure to Meet Agreed Upon State Level of Performance
Slide 30
Local Improvement Plan Requirement
Section 123(b)(2)–Failure to Meet Agreed Upon Local Level of Performance
…fail to meet at least 90 percent of an agreed upon State adjusted level of performance for any of the core indicators……develop and implement a program improvement plan (with special consideration to performance gaps within subgroups) …during the first program year succeeding the program year for which the local recipient failed to meet the performance level.
Slide 31
Withholding of Funds
Section 123(a)(3)(A) … the Secretary may withhold all or a portion the state’s administrative and leadership funds if a state …
Fails to implement an improvement plan. Fails to make any improvement within the
first program year of implementation of the improvement plan.
Fails to meet at least 90% of an agreed upon performance level for three consecutive years.
Section 123(b)(4)(A) … the State may withhold all or a portion of a local recipients funding if the local recipient…
Slide 32
Withholding of Funds–State & Local
Sanctions may be waived due to exceptional or uncontrollable circumstances.
Withheld funds are to be used to provide technical assistance.
Plans are underway to develop statewide technical assistance for all core indicators by consortia.
Slide 33
Evaluation of Performance – Local
Negotiated Level
90% of Negotiated Level
At or above target –
No action
Below 90% of target – Perkins Law requires an
Improvement Plan
Below target, but above 90% threshold
Report Required
Slide 34
Components of a Performance Improvement Plan and Report
Examination of the data—comparison of the target level and actual performance (incl. subgroups)
Context—an explanation of why the target was not met
Identification of general strategies to address performance gaps.
Specific actions to be taken to improve performance and to help the consortium meet negotiated targets in subsequent years.
Needed to complete
both Improvement reports and
improvement plans
Needed to complete
improvement plans only
Slide 36
TIME FOR YOUR QUESTIONS!
Please take a moment to enter your questions in the Chat field to the right.
Slide 37
Upcoming Accountability Webinars
Perkins Accountability II – Secondary Sept. 22, 20112:00 p.m. – 3:00 p.m.
Perkins Accountability II – Postsecondary Sept. 29, 20112:00 p.m. – 3:00 p.m.
To register, go to:www.cte.mnscu.edu/professionaldevelopment
Slide 38
Parting comments…
Thank you for all your valuable suggestions, diligent efforts and hard work to improve MN career and technical education for students, staff and employers.
Slide 39
Thanks for joining us today!
We value your feedback about today’s session. Please click on the link in
the chat window now to complete the session evaluation form.
REMINDER: For secondary participants, Continuing Education Units (CEU’s) will be made available for teachers and administrators for this series of webinars. In order to get the necessary certificates you MUST complete the session evaluation.