Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
PERFORMANCE REVIEW COMMITTEE (PRC) MEETING
8-9 July, 2015
(MGNREGA Division)
1
PHYSICAL PERFORMANCEUP TO JUN, 15
2
Performance against LB
National
KERALA UP
ASSAM
NAGALAND
HARYANA
TELANGANA
Ar P
MAHARASHTRA
ODIS
HA
UTTARAKHAND
KARNATAKA
WEST B
ENGAL
LAKSHADWEEP
BIHAR
MANIP
URA &
N
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
49%
105%102%
85%81%
80%
78%71%
64%60%
60%59%
58%57%
56%
51%50%
50%44%
42%
39%
25%25%
23%20%18%12%
12%12%
9%6%4%1%0%
• States to share the reasons and strategy to achieve the LB• Steps taken to conduct Rozgar Diwas
LB Vs Allocated PDs
National
PUDUCHERRY UP
PUNJAB
KARNATAKA
RAJASTHAN
TRIPURA
UTTARAKHAND
ODIS
HA
NAGALAND
GUJA
RAT
TAMIL
NADU
CHHATTISG
ARHJ
& K
BIHAR
MEG
HALAYAA &
N
0%
50%
100%
150%
200%
250%
300%
350%
400%
109%
358%
264%
198%187%
160%158%
157%
150%
142%
142%130%
116%
110%
107%88%86%
83%
74%70%
68%67%
64%61%
58%52%
39%32%
31%28%
20%9%1%
Performance against LB
S.No. State/ UTs LB (PDs) PDs Allocated Actual PDsActual PDs
against LB (%)1 PUDUCHERRY 1.85 4.89 1.95 105%2 KERALA 71.56 256.26 73.13 102%3 GOA 0.29 0.32 0.24 85%4 UP 427.69 799.50 346.21 81%5 AP 1263.34 2504.84 1014.09 80%6 ASSAM 67.57 87.75 52.49 78%7 PUNJAB 26.89 42.45 19.01 71%8 NAGALAND 84.48 62.24 53.97 64%9 TRIPURA 49.31 57.00 29.78 60%
10 HARYANA 16.75 26.22 10.04 60%11 JHARKHAND 256.63 227.07 151.03 59%12 TELANGANA 932.88 1495.08 543.84 58%13 RAJASTHAN 994.84 1411.07 570.90 57%14 Ar P 10.88 7.63 6.09 56%15 HP 58.68 83.35 29.72 51%16 MAHARASHTRA 517.12 428.98 259.54 50%
Contd.
Performance against LB
S.No. State/ UTs LB (PDs) PDs Allocated Actual PDsActual PDs
against LB (%)17 TAMIL NADU 1396.84 892.62 698.29 50%18 ODISHA 263.35 225.75 114.76 44%19 GUJARAT 72.00 48.86 30.46 42%20 UTTARAKHAND 30.36 32.53 11.90 39%21 MIZORAM 14.89 9.11 3.75 25%22 KARNATAKA 70.95 106.48 17.63 25%23 CHHATTISGARH 585.75 341.91 132.50 23%24 WEST BENGAL 546.97 285.22 110.72 20%25 SIKKIM 5.51 3.70 0.97 18%26 LAKSHADWEEP 0.06 0.02 0.01 12%27 MP 680.34 189.05 82.68 12%28 BIHAR 390.98 121.98 46.65 12%29 J & K 30.82 12.06 2.69 9%30 MANIPUR 24.93 2.24 1.50 6%31 MEGHALAYA 29.81 5.93 1.28 4%32 A & N 1.07 0.01 0.01 1%33 D & N HAVELI 0.00 0.00 0.00 0%
Total 8925.38 9772.14 4417.84 49%
PDs allocated Vs Actual persondays
• Huge gap in demand allocated & actual attendance on worksite
AP
TELANGANA
RAJASTHAN
TAMIL NADU UP
MAHARASHTRA
CHHATTISGARH
WEST BENGAL
KERALA
JHARKHAND
ODISHA MPBIH
AR
KARNATAKA
ASSAM HP0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
2505
1495 1411
893800
429 342 285 256 227 226 189 122 106 88 83
1014
544 571698
346 260132 111 73 151 115 83 47 18 52 30
PDs Allocated (in Lakhs) Actual PDs (in Lakhs)
Contd.
PDs allocated Vs Actual persondays
• Huge gap in demand allocated & actual attendance on worksite
NAGALAND
TRIPURA
GUJARAT
PUNJAB
UTTARAKHAND
HARYANA
J & K
MIZORAM Ar P
MEGHALA
YA
PUDUCHERRY
SIKKIM
MANIPURGOA
LAKSH
ADWEE
PA &
N
D & N
HAVELI
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
6257
49
42
33
26
129 8 6 5 4 2 0 0 0 0
54
30 30
19
12 10
3 4 61 2 1 2 0 0 0 0
PDs Allocated (in Lakhs) Actual PDs (in Lakhs)
Contd.
S.No. State/ UTs LB (PDs)PDs
Allocated Actual PDsActual PDs
against LB (%)1 UP 286.35 455.73 201.24 70%2 AP 494.85 658.62 323.46 65%3 ASSAM 55.20 56.58 34.53 63%4 KERALA 27.55 51.11 16.18 59%5 JHARKHAND 217.17 173.16 116.45 54%6 RAJASTHAN 492.17 552.24 242.96 49%7 NAGALAND 37.52 20.24 17.50 47%8 MAHARASHTRA 410.71 324.56 191.60 47%9 HARYANA 7.20 8.19 2.96 41%
10 HP 22.21 24.53 9.05 41%11 TELANGANA 293.87 312.89 116.91 40%12 PUNJAB 5.60 7.19 2.13 38%13 TRIPURA 16.85 13.11 6.19 37%14 ODISHA 195.06 149.79 67.00 34%
• Huge gap in demand allocated & actual attendance on worksite
IPPE Blocks: Performance against LB
IPPE Blocks: Performance against LBS.No. State/ UTs LB (PDs) PDs Allocated Actual PDs
Actual PDs against LB (%)
15 Ar P 7.62 3.29 2.56 34%16 TAMIL NADU 645.48 246.67 198.72 31%17 UTTARAKHAND 9.90 6.62 2.76 28%18 GUJARAT 40.46 16.27 9.93 25%19 CHHATTISGARH 491.81 271.11 100.95 21%20 MIZORAM 10.03 4.69 1.88 19%21 KARNATAKA 43.94 56.41 8.17 19%22 WEST BENGAL 263.41 119.86 46.41 18%23 BIHAR 280.07 82.73 31.62 11%24 MP 514.86 120.37 52.02 10%25 SIKKIM 1.95 0.59 0.16 8%26 J & K 6.21 2.06 0.43 7%27 MEGHALAYA 6.60 1.10 0.32 5%28 MANIPUR 18.66 0.93 0.83 4%
Total 4903.30 3740.66 1804.93 37%
• Huge gap in demand allocated & actual attendance on worksite
IPPE Blocks: Performance against LB
Natio
nalUP AP
ASSAM
KERALA
JHARKHAND
RAJASTHAN
NAGALAND
MAHARASHTRA
HARYANA HP
TELANGANA
PUNJAB
TRIPURA
ODIS
HAAr P
TAMIL
NADU
UTTARAKHAND
GUJA
RAT
CHHATTISG
ARH
MIZ
ORAM
KARNATAKA
WEST B
ENGAL
BIHAR
MP
SIKKIM
J & K
MEG
HALAYA
MANIP
UR
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
• IPPE block : 37% • Non-IPPE : 65% • Both : 49%.
IPPE II
Key Achievements of IPPE• Participatory Planning completed in about 93,500 GPs• About 250,000 block planning team members trained from
among youth from MGNREGS workers families and MGNREGS functionaries.
• More than 1.5 Crore vulnerable households reached individually and their demand projections and work priorities collected through structured survey format
• Compared to previous years, the new works planned in 2014-15 (for 2015-16) has far greater focus on agriculture
Key learnings from last year’s IPPE• Transmission loss due to many layered training programme• Inadequate provision in the planning design and in the MIS to
ensure adherence to people’s priorities• Inadequate participation of Line Departments• Inadequate preparatory work before the planning process in
terms of secondary information, maps etc. • Quality of Participation in the planning process was weak in
many areas• Collection and entry of data from household survey of
vulnerable households has been weak in many areas. • Of course considering that this is the first year of IPPE, the
achievement has been encouraging and further improvement can be expected this year.
Key Aspects of IPPE for 2016-17
• Focusing on the livelihoods of the poorest 10% households in each village identified based on the SECC database. • All the automatically included and landless agricultural labor households
as per SECC shall be provided work for 100 days. • Every deprived household shall be provided a job card, and it shall be in
their possession. This will be assured during the IPPE-II.
• The IPPE-II would be a joint exercise of MGNREGA and NRLM machineries, assisted by CSOs and line departments.
• Of the 2,500 Blocks, Blocks with substantial SHG presence will be monitored by NRLM/SRLMs • In the Blocks which are resource Blocks or Intensive Blocks or
Partnership Blocks or MKSP Blocks under NRLM, all the resource persons for the livelihood plan preparation will be provided by the SRLM concerned.
• In the Blocks which are not covered by (a) above, the SRLM will place livelihood specialists for training the BPTs in preparing the livelihood plans.
Activities in IPPE to identify works for 2016-17
• The community and infrastructure works already existing in the shelf of projects will be rechecked, and works which are not of use to the rural poor or to the community will be deleted.
• Such works that are needed by the poorest mohallas/tolas in the village will be added.
• New works will be identified to implement the livelihood plans of the poorest households identified during the IPPE.
• These works may be funded from MGNREGA if they are permissible works under the Act.
• If any work or a component of a work required for the livelihoods cannot be funded from the MGNREGA, it may be tied up from the funds of SHGs or from departmental funds or 14th Finance Commission funds, or other sources as decided by the Block.
• It is essential that funds for implementing these works are tied up before the planning exercise is completed.
Training Flow• A resource pool of about 120 national level trainers will be formed and
trained to bring them to similar levels of training competence. (by end of July 2015)
• States will constitute the State Resource Pool of Trainers with an average of 2 trainers drawn from each IPPE Block (end of July 2015)
• State level training programmes for the SRTs will be undertaken by the state with trainers provided from the National Resource Pool. (end of August 2015)
• Block Planning Teams shall be constituted by drawing from women and youth from worker households. In Blocks with substantial SHG presence, the BPTs will be constituted jointly by the officials of the SRLM and MGNREGS with principal focus on women from SHGs and including CRPs (Cluster Resource Persons) (by 15th August 2015)
• The SRT members will be grouped in to teams of 3 or 6 trainers based on the size of the blocks (number of GPs / size of GPs) and each such team will be in charge of three blocks for both training and handholding support.
• BPTs will be trained by the SRT members. (by 15th September 2015)
Muster Rolls vs Measurement Book
%age of Muster Rolls without Measurement Book
Zero KR, AP, OR, TS and TR
Zero to 60 % PU, HR, PB, MZ, GJ, UP, JH, BH
61 to 100 % AS, NL, MG, WB, HP, MA, Goa, KR, MP, TN, UK, RJ, SK, CH, MH, J&K, Ar P, A&N,
• 100% Saturation of Aadhaar Seeding in top 100 districts to be completed by initiating a special verification drives. States to initiate a drive for enrolling these workers under Aadhaar followed by 100% seeding of Aadhaar in NREGASoft by 31st July 2015.
• Aadhaar Verification by Programme Officers at Block level to use their logins to verify the Aadhaars failing demo-auth. All pending Aadhaar (44.58 Lakhs) to be verified by 31st July, 2015
• Active worker not having bank accounts:• States to expedite opening of Bank Accounts under PMJDY• All exemptions for cash payments will be taken off from 01st
August, 15• States to share issues if any by 15th July, 2015
• Addition of 84 districts under DBT having Aadhaar enrollment > 60%).• States to initiate a drive for enrolling workers under Aadhaar.• Complete Seeding of Aadhaar in NREGASoft by 31st July 2015.• Verify the Aadhaars in the PO login.• Ensure every worker has an account with aadhaar number
seeded in it.
DBT : ACTION PLAN
Active workers without Accounts (Bank/ Post Office)SN State
Active worker * [Worker in Last year or current FY] Active workers without accounts %age of workers without accounts
1NAGALAND 507976 507853 100.02A & NICOBAR 16276 14266 87.73MEGHALAYA 446224 338952 76.04AR. PRADESH 154475 93631 60.65MANIPUR 492685 285108 57.96LAKSHADWEEP 479 89 18.67BIHAR 1395499 181916 13.08J&K 425098 32572 7.79TELANGANA 4839592 298975 6.2
10CHHATTISGARH 3652906 196412 5.411UTTARAKHAND 563451 27031 4.812HP 600518 15392 2.613SIKKIM 63342 1619 2.614WEST BENGAL 7571357 162778 2.115RAJASTHAN 5838636 118695 2.016JHARKHAND 1534859 28913 1.917ASSAM 1357936 23229 1.718AP 6334415 108065 1.719MP 5810007 97979 1.720MAHARASHTRA 2531683 36581 1.421GUJARAT 964505 13442 1.422UP 5219045 49684 1.023MIZORAM 241010 2115 0.924PUNJAB 387553 2545 0.725GOA 7767 46 0.626ODISHA 2363719 9407 0.427KERALA 1562128 3484 0.228HARYANA 319289 563 0.229TAMIL NADU 6942325 9252 0.130TRIPURA 1073416 311 0.031KARNATAKA 2693465 214 0.0
Total 65948174 2661120 4.0
Aadhaar Seeding: Active workers - DBT districtsS No. State Total workers Aadhaar Seeded % of seeding
1 PUNJAB 529651 525151 99%
2 ANDHRA PRADESH 7461200 7186029 96%
3 SIKKIM 82228 78978 96%
4 PUDUCHERRY 47828 45708 96%
5 KERALA 1937141 1794345 93%
6 HIMACHAL PRADESH 823965 756626 92%
7 JHARKHAND 2027162 1853635 91%
8 HARYANA 523044 459418 88%
9 GOA 2722 2364 87%
10 TELANGANA 5826770 5055257 87%
11 TRIPURA 728118 592249 81%
12 LAKSHADWEEP 1007 750 74%
13 CHHATTISGARH 359617 261057 73%
14 MAHARASHTRA 3163962 2225807 70%
15 KARNATAKA 4286576 2980163 70%
16 TAMIL NADU 7320235 5005110 68%
17 RAJASTHAN 2788269 1892110 68%
18 WEST BENGAL 2023037 1202618 59%
19 ODISHA 707877 375136 53%
20 GUJARAT 390755 191317 49%
21 MADHYA PRADESH 5898181 2384615 40%
22 ANDAMAN AND NICOBAR 17104 0 0%
23 DADRA & NAGAR HAVELI 0 0 0%
24 DAMAN & DIU 0 0 0% Total 46946449 34868443 74%
Status of Mobile monitoring systemS No. State
10 GPs under IPPE Blocks Other GPs Device
RegisteredSanctioned Identified Sanctioned Identified
1 ANDHRA PRADESH 1160 0 1889 0 0
2 AR. P 610 0 0 0 0
3 ASSAM 1300 2 0 0 32
4 BIHAR 2930 0 641 0 1622
5 CHHATTISGARH 1050 0 569 0 1
6 GOA 10 0 0 0 2
7 GUJARAT 770 0 0 0 1
8 HARYANA 230 0 0 0 0
9 HP 110 89 567 174 287
10 J&K 270 8 0 0 0
11 JHARKHAND 1710 853 1322 88 3
12 KARNATAKA 690 0 0 0 9
13 KERALA 220 0 0 0 0
14 MADHYA PRADESH 1800 0 1076 7 69
15 MAHARASHTRA 1380 1336 1774 2 616
16 MANIPUR 260 123 0 0 16
17 MEGHALAYA 80 0 0 0 0
18 MIZORAM 150 150 0 0 68
19 NAGALAND 240 0 0 0 1
20 ODISHA 1800 1782 0 0 1
21 PUNJAB 180 179 0 0 0
22 RAJASTHAN 640 641 243 242 338
23 SIKKIM 50 20 176 7 7
24 TAMIL NADU 980 0 0 0 0
25 TELANGANA 780 0 1743 0 0
26 TRIPURA 150 141 0 0 31
27 UTTAR PRADESH 4030 4030 0 0 2061
28 UTTARAKHAND 180 0 0 0 0
29 WEST BENGAL 1240 9 0 0 846 Total 25000 9363 10000 520 6011
• States to fast pace the device procurement and implementation.
• State have been advised to decentralize procurement for expediting procurement process.
• All devices must be registered by 31st July, 2015
Status of selection of GPs for SBMS No. State
Total Panchayat
No. of GPs need for ODF
GPs marked as SBM
IHHL taken up in FY 15-16 in GPs marked as SBM
1 ANDHRA PRADESH 12997 3128 02 ARUNACHAL PRADESH 1828 141 03 ASSAM 2644 570 04 BIHAR 8529 2659 602 875 CHHATTISGARH 10969 1073 613 376326 GOA 190 49 07 GUJARAT 14319 - 08 HARYANA 6140 - 09 HIMACHAL PRADESH 3243 695 110 JAMMU AND KASHMIR 4199 273 011 JHARKHAND 4435 274 191 580912 KARNATAKA 5632 - 013 KERALA 978 100 014 MADHYA PRADESH 22992 4237 015 MAHARASHTRA 28577 1990 500 38616 MANIPUR 3097 938 017 MEGHALAYA 1825 - 018 MIZORAM 856 51 019 NAGALAND 1180 710 020 ODISHA 6232 1557 021 PUNJAB 13128 3297 022 RAJASTHAN 9897 11 023 SIKKIM 180 35 024 TAMIL NADU 12524 4231 4227 511425 TELANGANA 8866 - 026 TRIPURA 1127 475 12127 UTTAR PRADESH 51997 4100 3897 353228 UTTARAKHAND 8054 2501 71 28729 WEST BENGAL 3349 - 0 Total 2,50,102 33,168 10,224 52,847- Not communicated by States
Status of LIFE ProjectSN State Blocks GPs Target HHs Training status Survey HHs registered
1 AP 564 9232 215727 Done No* 02 ASSAM 42 331 6977 NA NA 03 BIHAR 215 1995 20099 State level done Started* 4264 CH 130 4099 46360 Done Ongoing* 1745 GUJARAT 100 1576 13207 NA NA 06 HARYANA 38 382 3967 NA NA 07 HP 64 1589 16072 NA NA 08 J&K 39 676 4828 NA NA 09 JH 189 3030 73024 Dist. Level ongoing No* 0
10 KARNATAKA 133 2854 40566 Done Ongoing* 188611 KERALA 137 854 54689 Mate trg. Done Ongoing* 81112 MP 310 14080 147336 Done Ongoing* 228813 MH 284 10290 149076 Done Ongoing* 18914 MANIPUR 1 6 37 NA NA 015 MEGHALAYA 26 472 22929 Done Ongoing* 016 ODISHA 241 3176 71106 NA NA 617 PUNJAB 8 135 504 NA NA 6218 RAJASTHAN 229 6771 244258 Block level ongoing Ongoing* 11819 SIKKIM 16 89 2697 NA NA 020 TAMIL NADU 370 10607 202909 Dist. Level done No* 021 TELANGANA 412 7004 107392 Strike of Staffs 022 TRIPURA 50 1085 219169 Done Ongoing* 429123 UP 481 11409 71771 Done No 524 UK 59 1325 5632 NA NA 025 WB 288 2456 131715 On 7th July Ongoing* 864126 A& NICOBAR 2 18 351 NA NA 0 Total 4428 95541 1872398 18897
SOCIAL AUDIT
Status of the State SAUs for 28 States
Name of State Nature of SAU Director, SAU Adherence to Social Audit Rules, 2011
1. West Bengal Cell within the Department of Rural Development
Full time Social Audit Director No * Begun the process of housing the SAU within an independent Society
2. Tamil Nadu
Society Full time Social Audit Director Yes
3. Rajasthan Cell within the Department of Rural Development
Full time Social Audit Director No
4. Madhya Pradesh Society Director SIRD given additional charge No
5. Andhra Pradesh Society Full time Social Audit Director Yes
6. Uttar Pradesh Society Full time Social Audit Director Yes
7. Chhattisgarh Society Full time Social Audit Director Yes
8. Telengana Society Full time Social Audit Director Yes
9. Karnataka Society Full time Social Audit Director Yes
10. Maharashtra Cell within the Department of Rural Development
Deputy Secretary, EGS given additional charge
No
11. Bihar Cell within the Department of Rural Development
Additional Secretary, Department of Rural Development given additional charge
No
12. Odisha Society No Director appointed No
13. Kerala No SAU constituted No Director appointed No * Initiated steps to set up an independent agency
14. Jharkhand Cell within SRLM Director, JSLPS given additional charge
No
15. Gujarat No SAU set up Deputy Commissioner, Rural Development given additional charge
No
16. Tripura NGO Full time Social Audit Director Yes
17. Himachal Pradesh No SAU constituted No Director appointed No
18. Assam SIRD SIRD Director given additional charge
No
19. Jammu and Kashmir
Cell within the Department of Rural Development
No Director appointed No
20. Punjab SIRD SIRD Director given additional charge
No
21. Uttarakhand No SAU constituted No Director appointed No
22. Manipur Independent Society No Director appointed No
23. Meghalaya Independent society Full time SAU Director appointed Yes
24. Haryana Cell within the Department of Rural Development
Director-cum-Special Secretary given additional charge
No
25. Nagaland SIRD Director, SIRD having additional charge
No
26. Mizoram Independent Society Full time Social Audit Director Yes
27. Sikkim NGO Full time Social Audit Director Yes
Pilot Social Audits • Pilot social audits in 202 GPs of Bihar • Pilot social audits in 510 GPs of Rajasthan • Pilot social audits in 50 GPs of Jharkhand • Proposed pilots in 549 GPs of Maharashtra • Proposed pilot of 1 GP (27 wards) in Kerala • Proposed pilot in West Bengal
CFT
CFT Expansion Model
1 block coordin
ator
2 shrama mitras per GP
• 1 Barefoot engineer
per 5 GPs
1. States will select Resource Organisation and Blocks2. Resource Organisation will place 1 Block co-ordinator3. Block co-ordinator will identify atleast 2 Shrama Mitras per GP4. Shrama Mitras will be necessarily women or SC or ST or a SHG
member5. Block co-ordinator will train Shrama Mitra at the block level for atleast
six days over a seven month period. 6. Barefoot Engineers will be identified, trained and attached in these
blocks.
Block Facilita
tion Team
What’s the same?
oDeliverables at block level of:
a) Average days per SC & ST household = 75
b) 100% wages on time
c) Participatory planning for NRM & livelihood focus plans per GP
oFocus on demand generation, awareness building, participatory planning and capacity building
oPreparation of Annual Action Plan per blockoMonitoring by block level co-ordination committees, state
and MoRD
Fund Structure
oResource Organisation will be paid for:
a) Salary for placement of 1 person per block
b) Training at block level for Shrama Mitrao State will be paid for State CFT celloShrama Mitras will be paid semi skilled wage rate through muster roll of open works
Immediate next steps
• 1. States are to identify blocks from list of Census Taluks. The number of blocks per state is fixed from within these 220 blocks. Bulk of blocks are in Bihar (63), Odisha (51) and Jharkhand (29).
• 2. State government to identify Resource Organisation to execute project in these areas.
• 3. Communicate blocks and resource organisation by 31st July 2015.
S. No. State No. of Backward Blocks
1. Andhra Pradesh 12
2. Arunachal Pradesh 28
3. Bihar 63
4. Chhattisgarh 8
5. Gujarat 1
6. Jharkhand 29
7. Madhya Pradesh 11
8. Maharashtra 1
9. Mizoram 2
10. Nagaland 7
11. Odisha 51
12. Rajasthan 6
13. Telengana 1
14. West Bengal 1
Total 220
Barefoot Engineers
States which have sent list of BFEs
States which are yet to send list of BFEs
Chhattisgarh Arunachal Pradesh
Jharkhand Gujarat
Kerala Jammu and Kashmir
Punjab Meghalaya
Rajasthan
Tripura
Uttrakhand
Next Steps
• 1. Pilot batches will be launched in August in Chhattisgarh and Jharkhand.
• 2. 3 month program of intensive training through Project Implementing Agencies identified by DDU-GKY.
• 3. Following this, commercial roll out to rest of the states.
THANKS
