Upload
anjali-angel-thakur
View
219
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/10/2019 Performance Evaluation Parameters for Projects and Non-Profits
1/58
8/10/2019 Performance Evaluation Parameters for Projects and Non-Profits
2/58
Introduction
Performance evaluation provides a solid foundation for predicting outcomes ofschedules in the early stages, simplifies spotting cost and schedule problems for
projects further along, and helps managers establish benchmarks and long-term
goals.
In short, as long as measuring project performance does not take too much time
away from core project work, the information gained will contribute to success.Some of the most appropriate financial and non financial performance measures
that not-for-profit organizations use for measuring and evaluating financial
performance are fund accounting, governance, product pricing, strategic planning
and budgeting etc.
8/10/2019 Performance Evaluation Parameters for Projects and Non-Profits
3/58
8/10/2019 Performance Evaluation Parameters for Projects and Non-Profits
4/58
4.1 Performance Evaluation of Projects:
A) Parameters forPerformance Evaluation of Project:
Finish Compliance
Start Compliance
Start / Finish Variance
Start / Finish Discrepancy
Accelerated
Started Ahead
Schedule Overrun
Took Longer than Planned
8/10/2019 Performance Evaluation Parameters for Projects and Non-Profits
5/58
4.1 Performance Evaluation of Projects:
A ) Parameters forPerformance Evaluation of Project:
1) Took Longer than Planned:
An interesting check that not many project managers focus on is the number of activities thattook longer than planned. An activity may start, or finish as planned, but due to a late start or
finish still have a longer duration than planned. This is useful insight for future planning.
2) Schedule Overrun:
Identifying which activities are delayed, and calculating the number of days of total delay on
each activity is useful in identifying poor planning during early execution. If caught soon
enough, the metric can help to identify how much acceleration is needed to finish on time, orprovide insight into exactly how delayed a project finish will be.
3) Started Ahead:
Evaluating performance should look at what is going wrong, but also note areas that are going
better than planned. Identifying activities that have started ahead of schedule (or finished
ahead of schedule) is another useful way to track performance and better forecast.
4) Accelerated:To find accelerated activities, look for any activity that started after its planned start date, but
finished before or on the planned finish date. This measure indicates improving execution
performance and also helps to pinpoint opportunities for future acceleration.
8/10/2019 Performance Evaluation Parameters for Projects and Non-Profits
6/58
8/10/2019 Performance Evaluation Parameters for Projects and Non-Profits
7/58
4.1 Performance Evaluation of Projects:
B) Project Control Process:
Control is the process of comparing actual performance against ph to identify deviations,
evaluate possible alternative courses of actions, and take appropriate corrective action. The
project control steps for measuring and evaluating project performance are presented
below.
Step 1: Setting Base Line Plan
Step 2: Measuring Progressand Performance
Step 3: Comparing Planagainst Actual
Step 4: Taking Action
8/10/2019 Performance Evaluation Parameters for Projects and Non-Profits
8/58
4.1 Performance Evaluation of Projects:
B) Project Control Process:
Step 1: Setting Base Line Plan:
The baseline plan provides us with the elements for measuring performance. The
baseline is derived from the cost and duration information found in the work breakdown
structure (WBS) database and time-sequence data from the network and resource
scheduling decisions. From the WBS the project resource schedule is used to time-phase
all work, resources, and budgets into a baseline plan. The baseline process, while a key
to project control, is often misunderstood. A baseline is defined as the original plan for a
project, a work package, or an activity, plus or minus approved changes. A modifier(Project Budget Estimate schedule baseline, performance measurement baseline) is
usually included. A baseline provides the "ruler" that a project can be evaluated with.
Baseline changes are significant events and should not be made without consideration
of their impact.
Step 2: Measuring Progress and Performance:Time and budgets are quantitative measures of performance that readily fit into the
integrated information system. Qualitative measures such as meeting customer
technical specifications and product function are most frequently determined by on-site
inspection or actual use. This chapter is limited to quantitative measures of time and
budget. Measurement of time performance is relatively easy and obvious.
8/10/2019 Performance Evaluation Parameters for Projects and Non-Profits
9/58
4.1 Performance Evaluation of Projects:
B) Project Control Process:
Step 3: Comparing Plan against Actual:
Because plans seldom materialize as expected, it becomes imperative to measure
deviations from plan to determine if action is necessary. Periodic monitoring and
measuring the status of the project allow for comparisons of actual versus expected
plans. It is crucial that the timing of status reports be frequent enough to allow for early
detection of variations from plan and early correction of causes. Usually status reports
should take place every one to four weeks to be useful and allow for proactive
correction.
Step 4: Taking Action:
If deviations from plans are significant, corrective action will be needed to bring the
project back in line with the original or revised plan. In some cases, conditions or scope
can change, which, in turn, will require a change in the in base line plan to recognize
new information.
8/10/2019 Performance Evaluation Parameters for Projects and Non-Profits
10/58
4.1 Performance Evaluation of Projects:
C) Methods of Variance Analysis:
Control is one of the most neglected areas of project management. Unfortunately, it is not
uncommon to find resistance to control processes. In essence, those who minimize the
importance of control are passing up a great opportunity to be effective managers and,
perhaps, allow the organization to gain a competitive edge. Neglecting control in
organizations with multiple projects is even more serious. For effective control, the project
manager needs a single information system to collect data and report progress on cost,
schedule, and specifications. Generally the method for measuring accomplishments centers
on two key computations:1) Comparing earned value with the expected schedule value.
2) Comparing earned value with the actual costs.
These comparisons can be made at the project level or down to the cost account level.
Project status can be determined for the latest period, all periods to date, and estimated to
the end of the project. Assessing the current status of a project using the earned valuecost/schedule system requires three data elementsplanned cost of the work scheduled
(PV), budgeted cost of the work completed (EV), and actual cost of the work completed (AC).
From these data the schedule variance (SV) and cost variance (CV) are computed each
reporting period. A positive variance indicates a desirable condition, while a negative
variance suggests problem; or changes that have taken place.
8/10/2019 Performance Evaluation Parameters for Projects and Non-Profits
11/58
4.1 Performance Evaluation of Projects:
C) Methods of Variance Analysis:
Fig : Cost and Schedule Graph
8/10/2019 Performance Evaluation Parameters for Projects and Non-Profits
12/58
4.1 Performance Evaluation of Projects:
C) Methods of Variance Analysis:
1) Scheduled Variance (Time Overruns):
A major goal of progress reporting is to catch any negative variances from plan as early as possible
to determine if corrective action is necessary. Fortunately, monitoring schedule performance is
relatively easy.
a) Meaning ofSchedule Variance (SV) :
Schedule variance presents an overall assessment of all work packages in the project scheduled to
date. It is important to note schedule variance contains no critical path information. Schedule
variance measures progress in dollars rather than time limits. Therefore, it is unlikely that any
translation of dollars to time will yield accurate information telling if any milestone or critical path isearly, on time, or late (even if the project occurs exactly as planned).
b) Attributes of Schedule Variance:
The only accurate method for determining the true time progress of the project is to compare the
project network schedule against the actual network schedule to measure if the project is on time.
However, SV is very useful in assessing the direction all the work in the project is takingafter 20 or
more percent of the project has been completed. The project network schedule, derived from theWBS/OBS, serves as the baseline to compare against actual performance. Attributes of Schedule
Control include:
i. Determining that the schedule has changed.
ii. Managing the actual changes when and as they occur.
8/10/2019 Performance Evaluation Parameters for Projects and Non-Profits
13/58
4.1 Performance Evaluation of Projects:
C) Methods of Variance Analysis:
1) Scheduled Variance (Time Overruns):
c) Different Aspects of Schedule Control:
i. Affected by any Number of Issues :
Schedule Control is one of the most difficult but important activities within project control.
The project schedule can be affected by any number of issues from resources to funding,
vendors, weather, and anything in between. The ability of a Project Manager to manage the
schedule of a project and deliver it on time is a high-visibility concern for project success
from a customer point of view.ii. Come from a Variety of Sources :
Schedule issues, as stated previously, come from a variety of sources; however, there should
be a single, focused method for dealing with schedule changes. If a potential schedule
problem is discovered, the problem must be investigated and the cause uncovered as soon
as possible. Once the problem is discovered, a plan should be created for correcting the
problem in the shortest allowable time with the least impact. It is also advisable to bringforward alternatives of varying costs.
iii. Managed at Project Planning Level :
Schedule Control is something that typically is managed at the project level by the Project
Manager; however, it is very important to make the customer aware that a schedule change
has occurred. Furthermore, the customer needs to be made aware of what is being done to
fix the issue and the impact it will have on the project's time line, performance anddeliverable.
8/10/2019 Performance Evaluation Parameters for Projects and Non-Profits
14/58
4.1 Performance Evaluation of Projects:
C) Methods of Variance Analysis:
2) Project Cost Variance (Cost Overrun):
Projects may fail to control cost, or go over budget, for many reasons. Often it is not a single
problem but a series of small problems that combined permit cost control to be sacrificed
and prevent the project from being completed successfully. Cost control contains the
following attributes:
1) Determine if the Project Budget Estimate has changed.
2) Manage the actual change and take corrective action.
3) Inform appropriate stakeholders of authorized changes
a) Meaning of Cost Variance:
Cost variance tells us if the work accomplished costs more or less than was planned at any
point over the life of the project. If labor and materials have not been separated, cost
variance should be reviewed carefully to isolate the cause to either labor or materials or to
both.
8/10/2019 Performance Evaluation Parameters for Projects and Non-Profits
15/58
4.1 Performance Evaluation of Projects:
C) Methods of Variance Analysis:
2) Project Cost Variance (Cost Overrun):
b) Steps to overcome Cost Variances:
i) Cost control is not simply a reporting process. It includes the searching out of the "why" for
both positive and negative variances between the scheduled and actual costs. It must be
thoroughly integrated with the other control processes. For example, inappropriate responses
to cost variances can cause quality or schedule problems or produce an unacceptable level of
risk later in the project.
ii) Consistent and Regular basis for Evaluation :
To be effective, all tools require the reporting of actual performance on a consistent and
regular basis for evaluation against project budget estimates. To prevent significant labor
overhead for the maintenance of cost information during a project, the source and methods
of reporting costs must be addressed in the initial phases of project planning and may be
addressed in the Project Budget Estimate.
8/10/2019 Performance Evaluation Parameters for Projects and Non-Profits
16/58
4.2 Performance Evaluation of Non Profit Organisations
Many different terms and definitions have been used to describe organizations operating in
neither private sector nor public sector, sometimes referred to as the nonprofit sector or the
third sector. Some of the most frequently used are; voluntary organizations, nongovernmental
organizations (NGOs), civil society organizations, charitable organizations and nonprofit
organizations.
A) Meaning of Non-Profit Organisation:
Nonprofit organizations, also known as charitable organizations, non-governmental
organizations, or tax-exempt organizations, are organizations, or corporate entities, that areformed for the purpose of fulfilling a mission to improve the common good of society rather
than to acquire and distribute profits. . Nonprofit organizations exist in some form in every
country in the world (commonly called nongovernmental organizations, or NGOs). Nonprofit
organizations provide a vehicle for people to do things that they cannot do apart, in which
they are engaged in communities.
8/10/2019 Performance Evaluation Parameters for Projects and Non-Profits
17/58
4.2 Performance Evaluation of Non Profit Organisations
B) Features of Non-Profit Organisation:
Passion forMission
Atmosphere of"Scarcity"
Bias towardInformality,
Participation andConsensus
Dual BottomLines: Missionand Financial
ProgramOutcomes are
Difficult to
Assess
Governing Boardhas both
Oversight andSupporting Roles
Individualshave MixedSkill Levels
Participationof Volunteers
8/10/2019 Performance Evaluation Parameters for Projects and Non-Profits
18/58
8/10/2019 Performance Evaluation Parameters for Projects and Non-Profits
19/58
4.2 Performance Evaluation of Non Profit Organisations
B) Features of Non-Profit Organisation:
The basic features of Not-for-Profit Organisation are:
5) ProgramOutcomes are Difficult to Assess:
Most nonprofit organizations have limited program evaluation capacity. This is partially
caused by the absence of standardized program outcomes in most fields. In child care for
example, standards for adult-child ratios exist, but little is standardized in terms of the quality
of care delivered.
6) Governing Board has both Oversight and Supporting Roles:
The governing board of a nonprofit has dual roles: it is responsible for ensuring that thepublic interest is served by the organization, and--unlike private sector boards of directors or
government boards and commissions--is expected to help the organization be successful. The
first role is analogous to protecting the interest of stockholders or voters.
7) Individuals have Mixed Skill Levels:
As a function of passion for the mission, limited financial resources, and a shallow pool of
candidates, nonprofit organizations often hire managers with limited management trainingand program staff with little program experience.
8) Participation of Volunteers:
Many nonprofit organizations rely on the active participation of volunteers. Members of the
Board of Directors are normally not paid for their work, and individuals contribute
considerable time and effort in delivering services and providing administrative support. The
contribution that volunteers make to the nonprofit sector is significant; indeed withoutvolunteerism many needed social services would not be available to the public.
8/10/2019 Performance Evaluation Parameters for Projects and Non-Profits
20/58
8/10/2019 Performance Evaluation Parameters for Projects and Non-Profits
21/58
4.2 Performance Evaluation of Non Profit Organisations
C) Performance Evaluation Parameter for Non Profit Organisation:
b) Non-Financial Performance Measures:
Many not-forprofit organizations have been developing new performance measurement
models and performance measures to track their non-financial performance. This reflects
organizational attempts to be more responsive to the need to measure performance against
the strategy and social- and/or member- focused mission of the organization. This not-for-
profit organization uses various performance metrics to measure success and guide strategy
in pursuit of financial excellence. These performance measures are then complemented by a
set of non-financial performance measures that attempt to capture the organizationssuccess in improving its clientseconomic, social, and spiritual life. To measure whether the
strategy is working, the Opportunity International performance measurement system
contains:
1) Indicators of economic performance, which measure the impact that micro lending has
on clients;
2) Indicators of social performance, which help understand whether the poor are betteroff in more fundamental ways after they became clients and
3) Indicators of spiritual dimension, which is at the core of the organization's mission.
The chosen metrics reveal that Opportunity International tries to monitor its success all the
way up to its social impacts.
8/10/2019 Performance Evaluation Parameters for Projects and Non-Profits
22/58
4.2 Performance Evaluation of Non Profit Organisations
C) Performance Evaluation Parameter for Non Profit Organisation:
c) Other Performance Measures :
Evidently researchers have identified that there are reasons for implementing performance
measurement even in nonprofits; the question now is what to measure? Performance
indicators are inputs, outputs, throughputs, outcomes and impact. These indicators derive
from the private sector but are applicable and used by nonprofits as well.
1) Inputs:
Inputs are defined as everything that is needed to carry out a mission or a certain project,
such as staff, volunteers, physical capital, material, income etc. It is of great interest fornonprofits to optimize all inputs.
2) Output:
Output is defined as the quantity of work performed or delivered services. Examples of
output measures are number of people attending workshops or training classes and numbers
of shelters provided during a disaster.
3) Throughputs :Throughputs include both efficiency and effectiveness measures and are linked to the
organizations activities. The reason for measuring different activities and processes within
the organization is to make it possible to evaluate organizational capacity.
8/10/2019 Performance Evaluation Parameters for Projects and Non-Profits
23/58
4.2 Performance Evaluation of Non Profit Organisations
C) Performance Evaluation Parameter for Non Profit Organisation:
c) Other Performance Measures :
4) Outcomes:
Outcomes are very closely related to the organizationsmission. Measuring outcomes and
evaluating effectiveness make it possible to see to what degree the organization achieve its
mission and goals. There are numerous ways of measuring outcomes, for example measuring
participant satisfaction or changing attitudes and behavior among participants. As an
alternative to measure outcomes several researchers suggest measuring impact on mission.
5) Impact:Impact is defined as all, even unintended, changes that are the result of the organizations
activities. The measured impact can be long-term or short-term, as well as positive or
negative. Measuring impact on mission is difficult. As one anonymous nonprofit manager
expressed; Measuring mission success is like the Holy Grail for nonprofit much sought
after, but never found.
8/10/2019 Performance Evaluation Parameters for Projects and Non-Profits
24/58
4.2 Performance Evaluation of Non Profit Organisations
D) Fund Accounting:
Tracking externally restricted contributions and internally restricted net assets is an
important task for management. A common method of doing so is the use of fund
accounting.
a) Meaning:
Fund accounting is based on the formal creation of individual funds (i.e., pots of assets
segregated for accounting purposes). A not-for-profit organization may formally establish a
number of funds, reflecting the variety of restrictions placed on them, either externally or
internally. Fund accounting groups together transactions and accounts related to similarlyrestricted activities.
8/10/2019 Performance Evaluation Parameters for Projects and Non-Profits
25/58
4.2 Performance Evaluation of Non Profit Organisations
D) Fund Accounting:
b) Statement of Operations and Fund Balances:
For reporting purposes, particularly external reporting, these many different funds are often
combined into a small number of similar funds, typically reflecting endowments (where the
capital cannot be spent at all, but the income derived from it can be used), restricted funds
(which can be spent, but only on certain activities), and unrestricted funds (which the
organization may use for any purpose). Sometimes, an additional distinction is made
between externally-restricted funds (i.e., by donors) and internally-restricted funds (i.e., by
the board). The Statement of Operations and Fund Balances shows, for each category offund, the revenues, the expenditures, the excess (or deficiency) of revenues over
expenditures, and the resultant change in the fund balance. In equation form, the year-end
fund balance is calculated this way:
Opening Fund Balance + Excess of Revenues over Expenditures = Closing Fund Balance
For each of the selected fund categories, the Statement of Financial Position shows the
assets, the liabilities and the fund balance. In equation form:Fund Balance = AssetsLiabilities
There can be transfers from unrestricted funds to internally restricted funds; these would be
shown by a reduction in the net fund balance of the former and an equal addition in the
latter. Any transfers between funds usually require the approval of the board.
8/10/2019 Performance Evaluation Parameters for Projects and Non-Profits
26/58
4.2 Performance Evaluation of Non Profit Organisations
D) Fund Accounting:
c) The Choice of Accounting Method for Recording Contributions under Fund Accounting:
A not-for-profit organization that is not using fund accounting is obliged to use the Deferral
Method of accounting for contributions, as was shown in the main body of this Guide. On
that basis, contributions for operations received in the current year that are not used in the
current year are reported as deferred contributions. Smaller organizations that do not
receive restricted contributions or receive infrequent and small contributions may find this
method less complex, as it does not involve fund accounting.
However, once an NPO has opted for fund accounting, it can choose between the two
methods of accounting for contributions for operations:
1) Deferral Method :
It can use the Deferral Method of matching revenues with expenditures in the period in
which those expenditures are incurred for all its funds, with unused contributions in each
fund showing as deferred contributions on the Statement of Financial Position. The main
body of the Guide and Appendix 1 used the Deferral Method.2) Restricted Fund Method :
It can use the Restricted Fund Method of accounting, which takes a restricted contribution
to a fund into revenue immediately in the year in which it is recorded, thereby
immediately increasing the net assets of that fund. When there are expenditures from the
fund, the net asset balance is reduced. When using the Restricted Fund Method with fund
accounting, the organisation must have an unrestricted fund usually called an OperatingFund (or General Fund) which is accounted for using the Deferral Method.
8/10/2019 Performance Evaluation Parameters for Projects and Non-Profits
27/58
4.2 Performance Evaluation of Non Profit Organisations
D) Fund Accounting:
d) Sample Statements Using Fund Accounting:
Most NPOs that choose fund accounting use the Restricted Fund Method of accounting for
restricted contributions. Accordingly, the following sample statements are presented in that
way. Under fund accounting, as the net assets are shown as fund balances included on the
Statement of Operations, there are only three financial statements:
1) Statement of Financial Position;
2) Statement of Operations and Changes in Fund Balances; and
3) Statement of Cash Flows.
1) Operating Fund :
An Operating Fund (a fund which holds the accumulated operating surpluses on an
unrestricted basis, available for the NPOs future use, and holds internally restricted funds, in
this example for special projects, and holds restricted amounts for which there is no
applicable restricted fund);
2) Capital Asset Fund :A Capital Asset Fund (an externally restricted fund related to capital assets); and
3) Endowment Fund :
An Endowment Fund (an externally restricted fund reflecting endowment contributions from
donors).
The three sample statements that follow are based on the same financial information already
presented for the NPO used for illustrative purposes.
8/10/2019 Performance Evaluation Parameters for Projects and Non-Profits
28/58
8/10/2019 Performance Evaluation Parameters for Projects and Non-Profits
29/58
4.2 Performance Evaluation of Non Profit Organisations
D) Fund Accounting:
f) Guidelines for the Statement of Operations and Fund Balances:
1) Deferred contributions appear only in the Operating Fund, as the accounting treatment in
that fund is based on the Deferral Method whereas the other funds use the Restricted
Fund Method which does not defer contributions.
2) The organization has decided to create a Capital Asset Fund. Restricted contributions for
capital purposes received during the year are included as revenue in the Capital Asset
Fund, as the organization is utilizing the Restricted Fund Method.
3) Total revenues across all funds are higher than the total revenues reported previously,
due to recognizing contributions, both for capital and for endowment, as revenues in the
cur-rent period under the Restricted Fund Method, instead of deferring the contributions
as had been done previously under the Deferral Method.
4) The total expenditure figure across all funds is identical to the amount reported
previously on the Statement of Operations.5) As total revenues are higher and total expenditures are the same, the total excess of
revenues over expenditures for the organization is higher than previously reported.
8/10/2019 Performance Evaluation Parameters for Projects and Non-Profits
30/58
8/10/2019 Performance Evaluation Parameters for Projects and Non-Profits
31/58
4.2 Performance Evaluation of Non Profit Organisations
E) Governance of Non Profit Organisations:
c) The Core Responsibilities of the Board:
Much has been written on the core responsibilities of the nonprofit board, and no one list is
universally applicable to all nonprofit organizations. The following summary reflects the list of
the board responsibilities articulated: It is the boards responsibility to:
1) Determine and articulate the organization's mission, vision, and core values.
2) Recruit and select the organization's chief executive.
3) Support and assess the performance of the organization's chief executive.
4) Ensure that the organization engages in planning for its future.
5) Determine the set of programs that the organization will deliver to implement its
strategies and accomplish its goals, and to monitor the performance of these programs
to assess their value.
6) Ensure that the organization has financial and other resources adequate to implement
its plans.
7) Ensure the effective management and use of the organization's financial and otherresources.
8) Enhance the organization's credibility and public image.
9) Ensure organizational integrity and accountability.
10) Assess and develop the board's own effectiveness.
8/10/2019 Performance Evaluation Parameters for Projects and Non-Profits
32/58
8/10/2019 Performance Evaluation Parameters for Projects and Non-Profits
33/58
8/10/2019 Performance Evaluation Parameters for Projects and Non-Profits
34/58
4.2 Performance Evaluation of Non Profit Organisations
F) Product Pricing for Non Profit Organisations:
Too often nonprofit organisations have thought of marketing as only promotion. However to
develop marketing strategy means also considering the pricing of the product. Of course,
pricing is complicated for non-profit organisations because they also rely on funding from
additional sources other than from customers.
a) Different Pricing Bases:
A non-profit organisation may be planning to launch a new service and would like to set the
price on a basis other than 'what the market will bear'. Or it may be already in the market
and wondering if they are under pricing or over pricing their product. In either case it is
important to have an appreciation for the various pricing bases that can be considered:
Full Cost
Pricing
Full Cost
Plus as Basis
Market-
basedPricing
Inducement
Pricing
8/10/2019 Performance Evaluation Parameters for Projects and Non-Profits
35/58
4.2 Performance Evaluation of Non Profit Organisations
F) Product Pricing for Non Profit Organisations:
a) Different Pricing Bases:
1) Full Cost Pricing:
Many nom-profit organisations use full cost as a basis of setting the norm for prices. The
rationale is fairly simple. Non-profit organization is not set-up to make a profit or a surplus.
Therefore, there is no reason to price the products/services at more than full cost.
2) Full Cost Plus as Basis:
Many mm-profit organisations find themselves compelled to set prices to include an
element of profit or surplus over full cost. The surplus is what adds to the equity or funding.
Such addition to the equity enables the organisation to replace assets and/or provide for
additional working capital.
3) Market-based Pricing:
Medical and educational services are examples of areas where market price may be a
consideration, but not a determining factor. Many of them will have a semi-monopolistic
position due to location, specialization in product offered, quality, etc., optimum pricing callsfor very careful examination of all these factors.
4) Inducement Pricing:
There could be situations in which a non-profit organisation purposely sets a price in order
`to induce the other suppliers to reduce their prices. In the case of the essential drug
project, the promoters were clear from the beginning that their intention was not to force
market prices down, but only to supply to select hospitals and medical centers for passing onthe benefit to the poor patients.
8/10/2019 Performance Evaluation Parameters for Projects and Non-Profits
36/58
8/10/2019 Performance Evaluation Parameters for Projects and Non-Profits
37/58
4.2 Performance Evaluation of Non Profit Organisations
G) Strategic Planning for Non Profit Organisations:
Most of us know that planning is a way of looking toward the future and deciding what the
organization will do in the future. Strategic planning involves choosing the highest priority
achievements that an organization is prepared to commit to over a period of three to five
years. The process of planning emphasizes conscious, thoughtful choices. If an organization is
in crisis or if the Board and/or management are spending most of their time reacting to tense
or uncertain present circumstances then the organization is not in a good place to begin the
planning process.
a) Meaning:
Strategic planning is a disciplined effort to produce decisions and actions that guide and
shape what the organization is, what it does, and why it does it. Both strategic planning and
long range planning cover several years. However, strategic planning requires the
organization to examine what it is and the environment in which it is working. Strategic
planning also helps the organization to focus its attention on the crucial issues and
challenges. It, therefore, helps the organization's leaders decide what to do about thoseissues and challenges. In short, as a result of a strategic planning process, an organization will
have a clearer idea of what it is, what it does, and what challenges it faces. If it follows the
plan, it will also enjoy enhanced performance and responsiveness to its environment.
8/10/2019 Performance Evaluation Parameters for Projects and Non-Profits
38/58
4.2 Performance Evaluation of Non Profit Organisations
G) Strategic Planning for Non Profit Organisations:
b) ImportanceofStrategic Planning in Non Profit Organisations:
It Guides Future Resource Developmentand Deployment
Builds Commitment
Helps to Set Priorities
Bring Clarity and Agreement on Missionand Vision
Help Organizations Prepare for the Future
Improve the Decision-Making Processes:
Promote Effective Stewardship:
Align the Board and Staff
Provide an Opportunity to Recommit to the
Cause
Identify Existing Strengths in the Organization
Help Organizations Anticipate and Manage
Change
Provide an Opportunity to Analyze theOrganizations Systems and Processes
Reinforce the Need to Commit to Continuous
Improvement
Importance of
Strategic
Planning in
Non Profit
Organisations
8/10/2019 Performance Evaluation Parameters for Projects and Non-Profits
39/58
8/10/2019 Performance Evaluation Parameters for Projects and Non-Profits
40/58
4.2 Performance Evaluation of Non Profit Organisations
G) Strategic Planning for Non Profit Organisations:
b) ImportanceofStrategic Planning in Non Profit Organisations:
4) Bring Clarity and Agreement on Mission and Vision:
Agreement on mission (the organizations purpose) is paramount. Without this agreement,
an organization cannot be effective. The strategic planning process can provide an invaluable
opportunity for dialogue and consensus among staff, board, and volunteers.
5) Help Organizations Prepare for the Future:
A strategic plan outlines the steps to achieve a desired future for an organization. It is
comforting for board, staff, and volunteers to have a roadmap to follow. The planning process
prioritizes the work to be done. Strategic planning facilitates making short-term decisions
based on long-term implications.
6) Help Organizations Anticipate and Manage Change:
Planning allows an organization to anticipate change and prepare for it. Planning also helps
an organization deal with dramatic changes in its environment. In fact, by anticipating and
planning for change, instead of just reacting to it, an organization can determine how to dealwith the change.
7) Improve the Decision-Making Processes:
With a strategic plan in place, day-to-day decision making and problem solving will be
directly related to long-range and short-term goals. Planning reduces stress by making
decisions easier.
8/10/2019 Performance Evaluation Parameters for Projects and Non-Profits
41/58
4.2 Performance Evaluation of Non Profit Organisations
G) Strategic Planning for Non Profit Organisations:
b) ImportanceofStrategic Planning in Non Profit Organisations:
8) Promote Effective Stewardship:
Practicing good stewardship means being accountable to others. In the case of charitable
organizations, clients and funders of a nonprofit organization assume they will pay for
services or donate money, respectively, to the organization, which will re-invest the
revenues to address the social need.
9) Align the Board and Staff:
When there is shared purpose and direction (wereall in the same boat,)there is the basis
of a high-performance team. When individuals are focused on the same goal or outcome,
they feel a certain amount of synergy and often set aside differences, help each other, and
become invested in a common purpose.
10 ) Provide an Opportunity to Recommit to the Cause:
Focus on the future work of the organization can bring the board, staff, and other
stakeholders into alignment around the mission group interaction around a cause oftenfuels individual commitment.
11) Identify Existing Strengths in the Organization:
Constituent feedback conducted in conjunction with the plan indicates how well the
organization is meeting expectations. It can also show where the efforts are paying off and
what to celebrate.
8/10/2019 Performance Evaluation Parameters for Projects and Non-Profits
42/58
4.2 Performance Evaluation of Non Profit Organisations
G) Strategic Planning for Non Profit Organisations:
b) ImportanceofStrategic Planning in Non Profit Organisations:
12) Provide an Opportunity to Analyze the OrganizationsSystems and Processes:
It is valuable to conduct a critical review of the organizations processes and how it
operates. A review provides an opportunity to analyze different systems and processes and
make changes to improve them. Pay particular attention to communication channels and
cross-functional operations.
13) Reinforce the Need to Commit to Continuous Improvement:
Planning allows an organization to anticipate and prepare for change. An organization
without an effective strategic plan may react in a hurried, scattered way to unanticipated
circumstances.
A well wrought strategic plan helps to set priorities and acquire and allocate the resources
needed to achieve goals.
8/10/2019 Performance Evaluation Parameters for Projects and Non-Profits
43/58
8/10/2019 Performance Evaluation Parameters for Projects and Non-Profits
44/58
8/10/2019 Performance Evaluation Parameters for Projects and Non-Profits
45/58
8/10/2019 Performance Evaluation Parameters for Projects and Non-Profits
46/58
4.2 Performance Evaluation of Non Profit Organisations
H) Budget Preparation for Non Profit Organisations:
b) Role of Budgeting for Nonprofit Organisations:
4) Helps to Choose most efficient Measures for Raising Money :
The budget plays a key role, forcing the organization to prioritize its activities so as to
determine those that are most critical for fulfilling its mission. In addition to deciding on how
to spend their revenue, a budget provides the documentation that helps nonprofits choose
the most efficient measures for raising money.
5) It Gives Structure and Substance to the OrganizationsPlans. :
A budget gives structure and substance to the organizations plans. The budget makes a
strong statement about the groups intentions as it indicates what the nonprofit expects to
tackle in the coming year, or years. As importantly, it provides a way to monitor progress.
When an item is accounted for in the budget, it becomes a tangible representation of the
organizationsgoals and an acknowledgment that resources will be expended to support it. It
demonstrates a proactive, thoughtful, deliberate approach to critical decision-making instead
of a less formalized process that is forced to react to every new idea without the benefit of
having planned for the circumstance.
8/10/2019 Performance Evaluation Parameters for Projects and Non-Profits
47/58
4.2 Performance Evaluation of Non Profit Organisations
H) Budget Preparation for Non Profit Organisations:
c) Guidelines to Prepare a Budget:
Realistic
Consistent
Measurable
The Budget should not be Written in Isolation
Budget should be Flexible
Highly Educated Assertions are Needed:
Budgets must be Timely and Accurate:
Budgets must be provided in Advance
Common Sense and Good Judgment are Essential
Historical Data can be obtained from the Books and Records.
8/10/2019 Performance Evaluation Parameters for Projects and Non-Profits
48/58
4.2 Performance Evaluation of Non Profit Organisations
H) Budget Preparation for Non Profit Organisations:
c) Guidelines to Prepare a Budget:
1) Realistic :
If a budget is to serve as a guide for fundraising efforts and program activities in the comingyear, it must be well-reasoned and reflect current conditions. Unsubstantiated revenue
projections and wild guess cost estimates will render a budget ineffective as a
management tool.
2) Consistent :
A budget must be consistent with short- and long-term strategic plans, and remain in line
with the organizationsmission.
3) Measurable:
The basis on which the budget is created should be the same basis on which the books are
maintained.
4) The Budget should not be Written in Isolation :
The budget should not be written in isolation, but rather, it will be more effective if taken
into consideration along with other planning tools and management information.
8/10/2019 Performance Evaluation Parameters for Projects and Non-Profits
49/58
4.2 Performance Evaluation of Non Profit Organisations
H) Budget Preparation for Non Profit Organisations:
c) Guidelines to Prepare a Budget:
5) Budget should be Flexible:
Nothing could be further from the truth. The budget is a constantly changing document, andone that must be referred to, and reflected on, regularly. It is a good approach to be as
flexible as possible. Rather than abandon a sound budget plan when an unforeseen situation
arises, the organization should instead be able to handle the change within the structure of
the budget
6) Highly Educated Assertions are Needed:
By going through the process of writing a budget, the organization will be faced with making
some tough decisions.
7) Budgets must be Timely and Accurate:
They are prepared with a lot of thought, time and effort and the approved budget must then
be reviewed throughout the year. The organization as a whole must agree to the budget cycle
and the priorities and goals of the organization as reflected in financial terms in the annual
budget.
8) Budgets must be provided in Advance:
The approved budget forms the basis for action. The draft budget should be provided to the
board members in advance of the board meeting so they have ample time to review. Once
the budget has been approved, it is usually passed over to the senior staff person for
management and implementation.
8/10/2019 Performance Evaluation Parameters for Projects and Non-Profits
50/58
4.2 Performance Evaluation of Non Profit Organisations
H) Budget Preparation for Non Profit Organisations:
c) Guidelines to Prepare a Budget:
9) Common Sense and Good Judgment are Essential :
Common sense and good judgment are essential to the preparation of a well thought outbudget. Always keep good notes on facts and assumptions to make. This information will be
invaluable when prepare subsequent budgets. Be familiar with the prior years data and
events that occurred during the year.
10) Historical Data can be obtained from the Books and Records. :
Historical data can be obtained from the books and records. However, if managers are using
accounting software make sure that all transactions have been recorded and that the user of
the software understands accounting practices and terminology. Budgets have been
prepared based on good data only to find out later that someones interpretation was
incorrect.
8/10/2019 Performance Evaluation Parameters for Projects and Non-Profits
51/58
4 3 Social Audit
8/10/2019 Performance Evaluation Parameters for Projects and Non-Profits
52/58
4.3 Social Audit
C) Principlesof Social Audit :
Principlesof Social
Audit
MultiPerspective /
Polyvocal
Comprehensive
Participatory
MultidirectionalRegular
Comparative
Verification
Disclosure
4 3 Social Audit
8/10/2019 Performance Evaluation Parameters for Projects and Non-Profits
53/58
4.3 Social Audit
C) Principlesof Social Audit :
The foremost principle of Social Audit is to achieve continuously improved performances
Relation to the chosen social objectives. Eight specific key principles have been identified
from Social Auditing practices around the world. They are:1) MultiPerspective / Polyvocal:
Aims to reflect the views (voices) of all those people (stakeholders) involved with or
affected by the organisation/department/programme.
2) Comprehensive:
Aims to (eventually) report on all aspects of the organisations work and performance.
3) Participatory:
Encourages participation of stakeholders and sharing of their value
4) Multidirectional:
Stakeholders share and give feedback on multiple aspects.
5) Regular:
Aims to produce social accounts on a regular basis so that the concept and the practice
become embedded in the culture of the organisation covering all the activities.
4 3 Social Audit
8/10/2019 Performance Evaluation Parameters for Projects and Non-Profits
54/58
4.3 Social Audit
C) Principlesof Social Audit :
6) Comparative:
Provides a means, whereby, the organisation can compare its own performance each
year and against appropriate external norms or benchmarks; and provide forcomparisons with organisations doing similar work and reporting in similar fashion.
7) Verification.
It ensures that the social accounts are audited by a suitably experienced person or
agency with no vested interest in the organisation.
8) Disclosure:
Ensures that the audited accounts are disclosed to stakeholders and the wider
community in the interests of accountability and transparency.
4 3 Social Audit
8/10/2019 Performance Evaluation Parameters for Projects and Non-Profits
55/58
4.3 Social Audit
D) Advantages of Social Audit :
Method ofMeasurement
ImpartialAppraisal
Improvementin Future
SocialStandards
4 3 Social Audit
8/10/2019 Performance Evaluation Parameters for Projects and Non-Profits
56/58
4.3 Social Audit
D) Advantages of Social Audit :
1) Method of Measurement:
Social audit provides a recognised method for bringing social point of view to the attention of
management.2) Impartial Appraisal:
As the appraisal of the individual corporations would be made by an impartial outside
agency, the assessment is reliable.
3) Improvement in Future:
The report of the social audit is made available to the company. This would be useful for the
organisations in the future. This in turn benefits the society.
4) Social Standards:
Social audit creates recognised social standards. These standards are useful for the
companies in the society. Companies can activate themselves on the basis of these
standards.
4 3 Social Audit
8/10/2019 Performance Evaluation Parameters for Projects and Non-Profits
57/58
4.3 Social Audit
E) Difficulties in Social Audit :
Difficultiesin Social
Audit
Lack ofUniversal
Scale
Collection ofData
Complicationsin Conversion
4 3 Social Audit
8/10/2019 Performance Evaluation Parameters for Projects and Non-Profits
58/58
4.3 Social Audit
Difficulties in Social Audit :
1) Lack of Universal Scale:
The major difficulty is lack of universal scale for measuring social performance. Every
business feels that they have done sufficient. Nobody knows the depth to which the socialactions need to be embraced e.g. cost alone cannot be an adequate measure. It does not
indicate the results of social involvement.
2) Collection of Data:
Data collection and their presentation is not possible in such a way that it will reflect
accurately the social involvement of business.
3) Complications in Conversion:
Converting social action into quantitative terms complicates the matter more.
Thus, Social Audit is publication of social responsibilities performed by the company. In fact if
a company is ethical and wants to do something for the society, it will not wait for a perfect
model of social audit.