Upload
viditkumaruit
View
771
Download
3
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. formed on 1st October ‘2000, is one of the largest & leading
public sector units providing comprehensive range of telecom services in India.
The modern business environment is characterized by uncertainty and changes,
competition, technological obsolescence, trust on quality and higher productivity
and above all fight for survival and success. Business Enterprises are
increasingly apprehensive of the growing competition and do not wish to be
remembered as a corporate dinosaurs The message is loud and clear. Attain and
sustain the cutting edge if you want to survive and succeed in this highly
competitive environment.
In the changing environment, the human factor has become more important than
ever before. Organizational are becoming increasingly dependent on people as
business tends to be more complex and diverse. HRM today, is not only slogan
but has become economic necessity. HRM strategies such as Performance
Appraisal, Training etc. have to be tailored to suit the business environment of
the economy. Of the various strategies and mechanisms, there is tremendous
potential in PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL SYSTEM (PAS) as an effective tool
for gaining competitive edge. In the modern day turbulent business environment,
innovative PAS strategies are required to meet a plethora of challenges. What is
true of one organization or nation may not necessarily apply exactly the same
way elsewhere. So we will need to innovate such strategies of performance
appraisal as suit the business environment of our economy in the wider context
of globalization. .
So in the pursuit competitive advantage, strengthened HRD mechanisms for PA
are expected to play an important role in ensuring employee involvement and
commitment to the corporate objectives, exhibit genuine qualitative concern for
developing appropriate work ethics and attitudes to performance, play an active
role in strategic planning. In the wake of fast changing business environment
there is need to do serious introspection about the existing PA systems and
processes operative in BSNL and identification of gaps to strength them and to
increase organizational effectiveness. The focus on innovative PA interventions
will in the long run, enable organization to leap much ahead of their competitors
in the global race for market supremacy.
CHAPTER 2
OVERVIEW OF BSNL
BSNL is the only service provider, making focused efforts & planned initiatives to
bridge the rural-urban digital divide in ICT sector. In fact there is no telecom operator in
the country to beat its reach with its wide network giving services in every nook &
corner of the country & operates across India except New Delhi & Mumbai. Whether it
is inaccessible areas of Siachen glacier or North-Eastern regions of the country, BSNL
serves its customers with a wide bouquet of telecom services namely Wireline, CDMA
mobile, GSM mobile, Internet, Broadband, Carrier service, MPLS-VPN, VSAT, VoIP,
IN Services, FTTH, etc
BSNL has installed Quality Telecom Network in the country & now focusing on
improving it, expanding the network, introducing new telecom services with ICT
applications in villages & winning customer's confidence. Today, it has about 43.74
million line basic telephone capacity, 8.83 million WLL capacity, 72.60 million GSM
capacity, 37,885 fixed exchanges, 68,162 GSM BTSs, 12,071 CDMA Towers, 197
Satellite Stations, 6,86,644 RKm. of OFC, 50,430 RKm. of microwave network
connecting 623 districts, 7330 cities/towns & 5.8 lakhs villages .
BSNL is numero uno of India in all services in its license area. The company offers wide
ranging & most transparent tariff schemes designed to suit every customer. BSNL has
90.09 million cellular & 5.06 million WLL customers as on 31.07.2011. 3G Facility has
been given to all 2G connections of BSNL. In basic services, BSNL is miles ahead of its
rivals, with 24.58 million wireline phone subscribers i.e. 71.93% share of the wireline
subscriber base.
BSNL has set up a world class multi-gigabit, multi-protocol convergent IP infrastructure
that provides convergent services like voice, data & video through the same Backbone &
Broadband Access Network. At present there are 8.09 million broadband customers.
The company has vast experience in planning, installation, network integration &
maintenance of switching & transmission networks & also has a world class ISO 9000
certified Telecom Training Institute.
During the 2010-11, turnover of BSNL is around Rs. 29,700 Crores.
VISION MISSION AND OBJECTIVES OF BSNL
VISION:
Be the leading telecom service provider in India with global presence.
Create a customer focused organization with excellence in customer care, sales
and marketing.
Leverage technology to provide affordable and innovative telecom.
Services/products across customer segments.
MISSION:
Be the leading telecom service provider in India with global presence.
Generating value for all stakeholders - employees, shareholders, vendors &
business associates
Maximizing return on existing assets with sustained focus on profitability
Becoming the most trusted, preferred and admired telecom brand
To explore International markets for Global presence
Creating a customer focused organization with excellence in customer care,
sales& marketing
Developing a marketing and sales culture that is responsive to customer needs
Excellence in customer service-”friendly, reliable, time bound, convenient and
courteous service”
Leveraging technology to provide affordable and innovative products/ services
across customer segments
Offering differentiated products/services tailored to different service segments
Providing reliable telecom services that are value for money
Providing a conducive work environment with strong focus on performance
Attracting talent and keeping them motivated
Enhancing employees skills and utilizing them effectively
Encouraging and rewarding individual and team/group performance
Establishing efficient business processes enabled by IT
Changing policies and processes to enable transparent, quick and efficient
decision making
Building effective IT systems and tools
OBJECTIVES:
To be the Leading Telecom Services provider by achieving higher rate of growth
so as to become a profitable enterprise.
To provide quality and reliable fixed telecom service to our customer and thereby
increase customers confidence.
To provide customer friendly mobile telephone service of high quality and play a
leading role as GSM operator in its area of operation.
Strategy for:
• Rightsizing the manpower
• Providing greater customer satisfaction
• Contribute towards:
• Broadband customers base of 20 Mn in India by the end of 2011-12 as per broadband
policy 2004.
• Providing telephone connections in villages as per Government policy.
• To leverage the existing infrastructure of BSNL for facilitating implementation of other
government programmes and initiatives particularly in the rural areas.
CORPORATE VISION/MISSION
Like all other organizations BSNL also has vision/ mission and objectives vis a –vis HR
vision/ mission and objectives to have shared vision is not just an idea but it compels an
organization to achieve new heights in order to realize the shared dream. It also helps in
forging a common identity amongst the diverse group of people in BSNL in a single
direction.
SWOT ANALYSIS OF BSNL
Strengths
BSNL has fully integrated IP-enabled infrastructure platform thus implying application
convergence, service convergence and network convergence.
It has been successful in building right alliances in the form of network alliances with
Ericsson and Cisco Systems, IT alliances with HP Compaq, interconnecting alliances.
Thus it can focus on its main business of marketing its service BSNL has been able to
maintain a strong distribution capability. It has a selling capacity of 25 million per
annum as compared to Nokia’s 20 million per annum.
It has 90000 handset outlets as compared to Nokia’s 42000. It has presence in 5000
towns serviced by 1500 distributors as compared to Nokia’s presence in 4600 towns
serviced by 250distributors/micro-distributors. It can leverage its strength in wireless
connectivity in the future to offer mobile telecom services. It has wireless connectivity
available in 4500 towns with a speed of 144kbps.
Backing by a healthy balance sheet of the parent company helps in investing in assets for
long-term growth. Also the BSNL culture focuses on financial conservatism, thus
providing it with good human skills at managing capital.
Weaknesses
The BSNL network does not deliver on the Quality of Service parameters as decided by
Telecom Regulatory authority of India (TRAI). Due to this it suffers from high call
dropping rates and a reduction in brand equity.
BSNL has a major presence only in C’ Circle. It needs to establish itself also in other
circles so that it can compete with player like Bharti on a national scale.
Opportunities
A strong economy and a growing market: The Indian telecommunication industry is
amongst the fastest growing telecom markets in the world and is poised to deliver solid
growth as a result of several economic reforms that have lead to strong GDP growth
pegged at approximately 9.1%for FY 2007-08. Increasing per capita income supported
by increased consumption is resulting in a greater-than-proportionate impetus for
telecom growth. As India still remains one of the lowest penetrated markets, it is one of
the most attractive telecom markets in the world today.
New technologies and paradigms: The trend towards adoption of Next Generation
Networks(NGN) is global and the discussions in India are still at a preliminary stage.
Technologies like Triple Play, wherein a single cable can deliver voice, data, video on
demand and IPTV provides with a unique opportunity to an integrated player who is well
positioned to deliver this service.
Strong strategic partnerships: Strong strategic alliances with network companies may
help BSNL Communication to focus on marketing its services. Alliances provide the
service provider the access to technological know-how as well as best practices to
enhance customer experience. It is important to leverage the strengths of our partners and
benefit from their experience and know-how.
Introduction of number portability: Number portability would allow customers to retain
their telephone numbers even after switching service providers or networks. Companies
with better service delivery and customer care platforms stand to gain over their
competitors. Extensive network coverage, coupled with aggressive pricing and
innovative products and services would help in gaining a larger share of the market.
Given a competitive position and focus on customer delight, BSNL may be positioned to
attract subscribers presently on other networks, as and when number portability gets
introduced in the market.
Threats
Regulatory decisions and changes: On the regulatory front, reduction in the entry fee and
the annual license fee for National Long Distance and International Long Distance
(ILD), combined with the impending implementation of Carrier Access Code (CAC)
would lead to greater competition in the Long Distance segment. The implementation of
Carrier Access Code would make it easier for customers to choose their long distance
carrier, regardless of the access provider. A focus on offering value-for-money services
to consumers would stand to gain from the introduction of CAC.
WELFARE MEASURES
Telecom Women’s Central Oganisation
Telecom Women’s Central Organisation (TWCO) is a voluntary organization registered
under the Societies Registration Act. Its members consist of the wives and daughters or
any female dependent of the officers and staff working in BSNL and other Telecom
Offices located in Delhi and women employees.
The main objective of the organization is promotion of the welfare of the families of the
employees. It organizes a wide variety of activities in the educational, cultural and social
spheres. Some of the activities undertaken by this organization include establishment,
operation and support to crèches for children of working mothers, setting up of tailoring
centres, supply of books and stationery to school going children of low paid employees,
etc.
SCHOLARSHIPS
Scholarships to the wards of the employees who are studying in professional degree
courses of 4 years and above of the employees is provided by BSNL.
BOOK AWARD
Book Awards are granted to school going children of the employees who have secured
75% or more marks in the last annual examination.
INCENTIVE FOR MERITORIOUS STUDENTS
Wards of BSNL employees who are toppers in the annual examination of schools are
granted incentives.
GROWTH PLAN AT BSNL
BSNL has continued its growth story ever since its formation & has reached a customer
base of 81.49 million as on 31 st March,2009 from 28.11 million as on 31 st March,2001.
BSNL further plans to increase its customer base to 160 Million by March, 2014.
New Services introduced/planned by BSNL
3G Services : BSNL has started 3G services in 290 cities and acquired more than 6lakh
customers. It has planned to roll out 3G services in 760 cities across the country in 2010-
11.
Broadband services : The shift in demand from voice to data has revolutionized the
very nature of the network. BSNL is poised to cash on this opportunity and has planned
for extensive expansion of the Broadband services. The Broadband customer base of
3.56 Million customer in March'2009 is planned to be increased to 16.00 million by
March 2014.
BSNL is also offering prepaid Broadband services. The customers availing prepaid
broadband have many advantages over post paid broadband like control on usage,
Mobility etc.
In addition to wireline broadband services, BSNL is also in the process of rolling out its
Wi-MAX network in rural areas to take an initial lead and provide wireless broadband
services in all rural blocks in the country during 2010-11. The Urban Wi-Max is also
being deployed in Kerala & Punjab Circles and shall cover all the mojor cities in these
circles.
Wi-Max services are also being provided through a Franchisee agent with M/s SOMA in
three states of Gujrat, AP and Maharashtra.
Value Added Services : BSNL is focussing on provision of value added
services/features to attract high end customers and to double its revenues from VAS
Fibre to Home(FTTH) : To meet the demand for high bandwidth services, BSNL is
rolling out FTTH services (GPON & GE-PON) for the first time in the country, which is
likely to generate substantial revenue in coming years. Services are likely to start by
March 2010.
Mobility in WLL: BSNL is planning to provide full mobility on its WLL network from
March 2010.
Important Projects Under Implementation
Tender for 93 Million GSM Mobile Lines to meet the requirement for next three to five years.
Wi-Max:
1000 Base Station rural Wimax project for 12000 CSCs covering all Telecom
Circles except A&N, J&K, Kerala & Kolkata Telecm District.
6863 Base Station rural Phase-II Wimax project for 56000 CSCs covering all
Telecom circles except Kerala & A&N.
CDR based Customer Care & Convergent Billing system.
Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system country wide.
Replacement of life expired exchanges by Class 5 NGN
Introduction of Fixed Mobile Convergence to add value to Fixed Network
ENTERPRISE RESOURCE PLANNING AT BSNL
ERP implementation Team structure
Implementation of ERP system is a huge exercise for any organization and is a Highly
focused resource intensive activity. ERP implementation is around 14 modules as listed
above. These modules represent key business functions. Different Modules teams, which
are also subject Matter Experts (SMEs) for that particular functions shall assume the
responsibility of System Requirement Specifications (SRS) finalization, carrying out
BPR Exercise and then association in implementation in the ERP system.
IT Cell/ IT Project Circle will act as a facilitator for this exercise, setup, validate and
maintain data center with required hardware, network and upkeep of ERP software as
well.
Two of the CDR Project data centers are to be used. Hyderabad is being primary ERP
site and Kolkata is DR site. ERP is being deployed like another application of CDR
Project to be deployed in CDR Data center. Security systems, Access Control System,
Identity Management, UPS, and Storage etc of CDR system are being used. Intranet
being rolled out in CDR Project is the default network for ERP as well. There will be a
need for additional network for non CDR units of BSNL. Development Centre for ERP
is setup at ALTTC Ghaziabad.
Centralized Architecture
ERP will be Centralized Installation with a single database. All units will access the
central server. They will have secure access to their own set of data & processes.
Corporate Office will be having view of BSNL as a whole across circles.
IT Cell/ IT Project Circle will act as a facilitator for ERP implementation in BSNL.
Role and Responsibilities
Setup the ERP data center,
Install and Commission and Validate ERP Hardware and Software
Set up country wide ERP user Network extending to each and every location and
BSNL Point of Presence
Configuring the ERP system as per SRS document
Validation and AT of ERP system in association with Module teams
Co-ordinate activity of Data extraction, conversion to electronic format and
migration of data to ERP system in association with Module teams
Training of the BSNL officials etc
Day-to-day operation and maintenance of ERP system and providing operation
support to BSNL staff.
Roles and responsibilities of Module Teams
To capture, map and document all the existing “as it is” Business Processes,
Work Flows and Decision
Finalization of SRS (System Requirement Specifications) document of their part
To carry out the BPR exercise with the help of SI and Management Consultant
To identify critical business for BPR and suggest new critical processes, work
flows, re-engineering and optimization of existing processes, to simplify,
improve and even speedup the work environment
Associate in configuring, validation and AT the ERP system as per the SRS
finalized by them
Associate with CGM ITPC in coordinating activity of Data extraction, conversion
to electronic format and migration of data to ERP system for their respective part
ERP implementation
Role of Circles:
• Study and understand new process as per BPR
• Ensuring availability of IT Infrastructure (Computers and Network)
• Creation of L1 and L2 Support Centres
• Identification of SPOC(Single Point of Contact) officers for Data Preparation
• Preparation of Master Data
• Identification of Power Users
• Training
• Preparation of Transactional Data (At the time of Pre Go Live)
• Go Live Activities
Various guidelines issued from time to time in this regard are available at ERP
Portal which can be accessed from BSNL Intranet.
CHAPTER 3
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL
WHAT IS PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL
Performance appraisal (PA) is the process through which an individual employee’s
behavior and accomplishments for a fixed time period are measured and evaluated. The
major purpose of measuring and evaluating is to assess the worth of value.
According to HEYEL
“It is a process of evaluating the performance and qualification of the employee’s in
terms of the requirements of the job for which he is employed, for purposes of
administration including placement, selection for promotions, providing financial
rewards and other actions.”
According to SCOTT & SPRIEGEL
“Performance appraisal is a step where the management finds out how effective it has
been at hiring and placing employees”
Performance appraisal is thus the process of reviewing an individual’s performance and
progress in a job and assessing his potential for future improvement. Conducting
performance appraisal on employee’s performance should be more than a simple
checklist of “do’s and don’ts”. Performance evaluation should serve as a vital
component, one of that is of the interest to both the organization and employee. From the
organizational perspective, sound performance appraisal can assure that correct work is
being done, work that assist in meaning department goals. In a simple rendition, each
employee’s work should support the activities on his boss’s performance objective.
From the employee perspective, properly operating performance appraisal systems
provide a clear communication of workers expectations. Knowing what is expected is the
step in helping one to cope better with the stress usually associated with a lack of clear
direction. Secondly, properly designed performance appraisals should also serve as
means of assisting an employee’s personal development.
To make effective performance appraisal a reality, five criteria need to be present:
Employee should be actively involved in the evaluation process.
Bosses need to enter performance appraisals with a constructive and helpful
attitude.
Realistic goals must be mutually set.
Bosses must be aware, and have knowledge of employee’s job and performance.
Proper feed back should also be given to the employees.
If these criteria are present, the performance appraisal process now becomes a
communications meeting. With both parties well prepared for the performance review,
the two discuss the total performance of the employee, addressing both the strengths and
weakness of he employee, and how these attributes led to the attainment of the mutually
agreed goals. While at this stage one is not only addressing past performance, but also
areas for continued development have been identified. The next step, then, is to meet and
plan for employee’s development.
Performance appraisal need to be stressful or threatening as they are. With proper
preparation and the few key criteria in place, the performance appraisal process can be
enhanced. This however, we can expect to reap this enhancement only after we make this
transaction towards more participative performance appraisal.
COMPONENTS OF APPRAISAL
The performance evaluation system should address the questions who, what, when,
where, how of performance appraisal.
“WHO of the Appraisal”
Usually the immediate supervisor is entrusted with the task of rating the assessee but in
organizations appraisal is also done by staff specialist, i.e, the personal officer or rating
committee is appointed. His peers can also do the appraisal of an individual. Research
has found that appraisal done by peers is more accurate. Sometimes self evaluatuion is
also employed for evaluating performance. Thus the ideal way is to adopt 360 degree
appraisal method.
“What” of Appraisal
It includes evaluation of human trades under various parameters like education
eadership, ambition, loyalty, vision, attitude, character, decision making knowledge,
output etc. This also means appraising non-supervisory managers.
“Why” of Appraisal
It is concerned with (a) creating and maintaining a satisfactory level of performance of
emp[loyees in their present job. (b) highlighting employee’s needs and opportunities for
personal growth and development. (c) promoting understanding between the supervisor
and his subordinates. (d) providing useful criteria for determining the validity of selectin
and training methods.
“When” of appraisal
Appraisal can be either SUMMATIVE OR FORMATIVE. In a summative appraisal, an
individual is evaluated at the end of specific period of time by summing his total
achievements of stated goals. Formative system, on the other hand, sees appraisal as an
ongoing process is i.e, daily, where individual deceives a constant feed back.
“Where” of Appraisal
‘Where’ deals with the location of appraisal. It is usually done at the place of work or of
the supervisor. In formal appraisals may take place anywhere, both on the job in the
work situation and off the job.
NEED FOR APPPRAISAL
Performance appraisal has become a very common affair in any organization actually it
is constant effort on the part of every manager to evaluate the performance of
subordinate executives. Following are some reasons for conducting performance
appraisal.
It serves as a basis for the job change or promotion.
It provides a clear understanding to the superior about his subordinate’s
contribution and the capability or potential to contribute.
By identifying the strengths and weakness of an employee it serves as a guide for
formulating a suitable training and development programme.
It serves as a feedback to the employee, by letting him know how well he is doing
or where he stands.
The existence of regular appraisal system tends to make the supervisor and
executives more observant of their subordinates.
It enables to locate the problem which may stand on the way of performance; so
that corrective action can be taken.
Performance appraisal provides basis for setting realistic standards.
It provides basis for fixing compensation, incentives and bonus. The estimates of
relative contribution of employees help to determine the rewards and privileges
rationally.
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL PROCESS
Process Defined
The fig outlines the appraisal process. Each step in the process is crucial and is arranged
logically. The explanation for each step is as follows:
Objectives of performance appraisal
Establish job Expectations
Design appraisal programme
Use of Appraisal Data
Performance Interview
Appraised Performance
Objectives of Appraisal
Objectives of appraisal include effecting promotions and transfers; assessing training
needs, awarding pay increases, and the like. The emphasis in all these is to correct the
problems. The system approach, appraisal aims at improving the performance, instead of
merely assessing it, the emphasis is not on individual assessment and rewards and
punishment but on how system affects an individual’s performance.
Establish Job Expectations
The second step in the appraisal process is to establish job expectations. This includes
informing the employee what is expected of him on the job. Normally, a discussion is
held with his supervisor to review the major duties contained in the job description.
Individuals should not be excepted to begin the job until they understand what is
expected of him.
Design Appraisal Programme
Designing appraisal programme poses several questions, which need to be answered.
They are (1) formal vs. informal appraisal; (2) whose performance is to be assessed? (3)
who are the raters? (4) what problems are encountered? (5) how to solve the problems?
(6) what should be evaluated? (7) when to evaluate? (8) what methods of appraisal are to
be used?
Appraise Performance
Now the next and the most step are to appraise the employees. Using various appraisal
methods and techniques can do this. Appraisal can also be done informally. Few past
oriented and feature oriented appraisal methods are forced choice method, checklist,
rating scale-grading management by objectives 360-appraisal etc.
Performance Interview
Now the next step is to review the performance with the rates, so that they stand in the
eyes of the superior. Feedback is necessary to effect the improvement in performance,
especially when it is inadequate. Performance interview has three goals (1) to change
behavior of employees whose performance dose not meet organizations & personal goals
(2) to maintain the behavior of employees who perform in acceptable manner (3) to
recognize superior performance behavior so that they can be continued.
Use of Appraisal Data
Now the final step in the evaluation process is the use of evaluation data. HR department
must use the data and information generated through performance evaluation.
Specifically, the data and information will be useful in the following areas of HRM:
Remuneration administration
Validation of selection programmed
Employee training and development programmes
Promotions, transfers and lay off decisions
Grievance and discipline programmes
HR planning
Job Description
& Job Specificatio
n
CAREER PLANNING
DEVELOPMENT AND
TRAINING
PROCUREMENT
Placement Induction
REMUNARATIONAND
REWARDS
APPRAISALSPerformances
PotentialSalary
MANPOWER PLANNING
Manning training
Succession Plan
ORGANISATIONStructure
Objectives Health
Management Style Resources
Methods of Performance Appraisal
Numerous methods have been devised to measure the quantity and quantity of
employee’s job performance. Broadly, all the approaches to appraisal can be classified
into(1) past oriented methods (2) future oriented methods
Rating Scale Method:
This is the simplest and the most popular technique for appraising employee
performance. The typical rating scale system consist of several numerical scales, each
representing a job related performance criterion such as dependability, initiative, output,
attendance, attitude, co-operation etc. Each scale range from excellent to poor. The rater
checks the appropriate performance level on each level on each criterion, and then
computes the employee’s total numerical score. The number of points scored may be
linked to salary increases, rating scale offers the advantages of adaptability, relatively
easy use and low cost. The disadvantage of this method is that rater’s biases are likely to
influence evaluation. Furthermore, numerical scoring gives an illusion precisions that is
really unfounded.
Ranking Method:
In this method the man and his performance are considered as an entity by the rater. No
attempt is made to fractionalize the rate on his performance; the whole is compared with
the “whole man”; that is the ranking of the man in a work group is done against that of
another. The relative position of each is tested in terms of his performance against that of
another member of a competitive group by placing him as number one or two or three in
total group; i.e. persons are tested in order of merit and placed in a simple grouping.
This is a simplest method of separating the most efficient from the least, and relatively
easy to develop and use. The greatest limitation of this method is that in practice it is
very difficult to compare human being having varying behavior traits.
Forced Choice Method:
In this the rate is given a series of statement about an employee. These statements are
arranged in blocks of two or more, and the rater indicates which statement is most or
least descriptive of the employee. The rater I simply expected to select the statement that
describes the rate’s actual assessment. In advantage of this method is absence of personal
biases in rating.
Checklist:
Under this method, a checklist of statement on the traits of the employee and his or her
job is prepared in two columns-viz., a ‘Yes’ columns and a ‘No’ columns. All that rater
(immediate superior) should do is tick the ‘Yes’ column if the answer to the statement is
positive and in column ‘No’ if the answer is negative. After ticking off against each item,
rater forwards the list to the HR department where the actual assessment of employee
takes place.
The advantage of this method is economy and ease, and disadvantage is personal biases
and it does not allow the rater to give up relative ratings.
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL AT BSNL
Performance Appraisal at BSNL is done by a balanced score card technique. That is each
employee is provided a score as per his performance in his field.
All this done through a channel or process which includes:
1. Reporting manager
2. Reviewer
3. HOD
4. HR Head
5. Normalization Committee
Reporting Manager
Reporting Manager keeps the track of the employee and provides its feedback to the
reviewer or HOD which consists of employee’s behavioral traits indicated in PMS Policy
manual. The reporting manger also ensures that the employee is aware of normalization,
or performance appraisal process, in case of its lack of knowledge to employee the
reporting manager makes the employee aware of the performance appraisal policy
adopted by BSNL. He also discuss the employee concerns/ queries on performance
ratings with the reviewer.
Reviewer
Reviewer collects the information of the employee such as behavioral traits and other
matters which he has to review, all this information is provided to him by the reporting
manager.
In some cases the reviewer also independently assess the employees for said behavioral
traits and explain its merits or demerits; such assessments might require collecting data
directly from the employee or other relevant employees.
Head of Department
CHAPTER NO 5
PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL IN BSNL
In BSNL, the concerning rules are called Employee Performance Appraisal rules
in 1995.
The Performance Appraisal system in BSNL seeks to evaluate
The work performance of an employee on the present job relation to the expected
level of performance, both qualitative and quantitative.
The extent of development achieved by the employee during the period under
review.
Evaluation of behavioral attributes attitudes and abilities.
Evaluation of potential for assuming higher responsibilities.
TITLE
These rules will be called Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd,
Executive Performance Appraisal rules 1995.
Application
These rules shall apply to all executives in all grades, belongings to different cadres of
BSNL including its subsidiaries and associated offices, if any. All executives on
deputation to BSNL will also be governed by these rules.
Definition Of Executive
An executive is a person employed under the authority of BSNL in any of the executive
grades but shall not include Directors of any other person appointed by the President of
India, for any of the offices in BSNL or its subsidiaries and associated offices.
Appraisal Year
The appraisal period is 12 months of financial year between 1st April of a year to the 31st
March of the succeeding year.
Appraisee
An appraisee is an executive who has worked under the direct control and supervision of
other executive for a minimum period of 4 months within time span of 1st April 31st
March (12 months) in appraisal year.
Appraisers
There are two levels of appraisers
The first appraiser also called Reporting Authority, means an executive under whose
direct control and supervision the appraise operates. In case of second appraise,
immediate functional senior executive (who may be equal in status of 1st appraiser) could
be the joint Appraiser with the Reporting Authority, and he would only record whether
or not he agrees with the observation of the first Appraiser.
Accepting Authority
A very senior officer who is designated under the roles of re- looks at the performance of
the appraise, and reviews the observations of the first and the second appraisers. He
would finally determine and evaluate the performance of the Appraise. In case of
disparity between his assessment and that of the first and second appraisers, he has to
record the basis of his revised assessment. He is expected to record specifically his
comments in case of overall performance grading EC to PC and low score for personality
traits by either of the earlier two Appraisers.
Appellate Authority
Project General Manager, Regional Directors, Group General Managers and Company
Directors would be Appellate Authority to take the decisions on representations of
different level of appraise executives. They would also take the final decisions on the
evaluation of the performance of the appraise in special cases.
Roles and Responsibilities of the Reporting Authority
The overall performance classification in grades is to be determined by:
Examining both a performance
Personality of the appraise
The parameters of this task are listed in part 2 of the Par format in blocks EC to PC
In evaluating performance (EC) due consideration is to be given to the benchmark
indicate therein and one numerical block only is to be ticked.
In respect of the personality trait in blocks SC, C, and PC only the numerical block is to
be ticked after considering the benchmarks indicated therein.
Special Comments by Reviewing Office
After the detailed analysis of performance/ personality traits by the Reporting Office, the
Reviewing officer is required to offer the special comments (no numerical values in
respect of few special items like integrity, professional potential for growth and like,
specific areas functions for potential growth mentioned.
Overall Assessment by Accepting Authority
The Accepting Authority will minutely examine the observation made by the first
appraiser and the reviewing authority and also self-appraisal of the appraisee, and taking
due consideration of all the aspects, determine overall grade and also comment on the
total performance.
The Grading System
The grading system in BSNL is based on “Balanced Score Card” method of performance
appraisal. It perhaps the most commonly used method. Under this method a printed form
is used to evaluate the performance of the employee. A variety of traits may be used in
these types of rating devices, the most common being the quality and quantity of work.
In BSNL performance appraisal form to block numerical values have been assigned to
assist the first appraiser in making overall assessment. The overall total score for
determining a grade is merely a guide and the final grade may be at variance with the
total score. The second appraiser i.e. the interviewing Authority and the Accepting
Authority have to take an overall view, both of the performance and the personality of
the appraisee, while determining the “Final Grading “. The Accepting Authority arrives
at the final grading by judiciously weighing the assessment of Reviewing Authority
which may belong to functional discipline of the appraisee along with the detailed
assessment of the Reporting Authority.
Moderation
This means re- evaluation of the PAR of the appraisee and the grade awarded by the
accepting authority to correct any observations. The head of the personal department at
the region i.e. GM (HR) will review the PARS of the executives up to E-3 level and
advice of the regional director for moderation if required on the basis of analysis of
reports. The regional director in consultation with the functional head (which has to be
recorded in PAR) will have authority to moderate PAR.
CURRENT INITIATIVES OF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL
SYSTEM IN BSNL
Implementation of E Par
(IT – Enabled Performance Appraisal Report)
As it is advantageous for e par system such as;
Streamlining of PAR process.
Uniform application of company policy.
Authenticity and audit trial of transactions
System monitoring mechanism and control
Cutting down on delay and fixing of responsibility/ accountability in delay which helps
in faster decision making on issues such as promotions
In view of this benefit ,it was decided to implement IT enable PAR system in BSNL
w.e.f assessment year 2008-2009 , initially for the year EC TO PC level executives , later
to be ruled out in other phases to other level.
INCORPORATION OF PAR BASED 3600 EVALUATION
(EC CONCEPT LEVEL)
The (360 0) feedback involves collecting perception about a person’s behavior and the
impact of the behavior from the person’s boss or bosses direct reports, colleagues, fellow
members of project teams, internal and external, customers, suppliers. Other names for
360 0 feedback are multi-rater feedback, full circle appraisal and group performance
review.
In order for an organization to be ready for an effective 360 0 feedback, a number of
question need to be answered. The effectiveness of the feedback if directly linked to the
integrity of the process, and the integrity of the process is measured in terms of
commitment, clarity of purpose and follows up.
A 360 0 feedback is recommended for accomplishing a detailed plan to address these
issues to prior implementation.
At present in BSNL, this is the concept level and efforts are being made to use it
effectively for attaining the overall goals of the organization.
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
Problem Formulation
BSNL is a large organization having a separate and well- managed Human Resource
department. As far as performance appraisal system is concerned it was found that it
does not identify the employee’s development needs for helping them to perform their
work more efficiently and effectively. As PAR system used in BSNL is more on paper
work rather than tool for improving efficiency of the individual .
Research Objective
To study the perception of employees regarding the performance appraisal system in
BSNL.
To study the procedures of performance appraisal of BSNL.
Research Design
Research Design is a model for the collection of formal information as it stands for
advance planning of the method to be adopted for collecting the relevant data. In this
research descriptive research approach was followed. The major purpose of the
descriptive research to describe the characteristics of a particular group.
Sources of Data Collection
There are two sources through which data is collected.
Primary Data: Primary Data is fresh data which has been collected from the survey area
through Questionnaire.
Secondary Data: Analysis of existing document, this method involves the study of
various documents available in the organization, which may contain information for the
study. Annual reports of BSNL .
PAR rules
Some old projects
Books on performance appraisal
Internet
Primary Data Collection Method
The data has been collected through survey by which a semi structured questionnaire
which comprises of close ended and open ended questions.
Instruments used for data collection method
By Questionnaire: Keeping in view the objective and reluctance which might be
expressed by the employee in answering the straight forward questions,
A questionnaire designed was structured one. The questionnaire was framed in such a
manner that it should provide a complete relevant information required to fulfill the
objective. The questionnaire contained both open & closed ended questions. Close ended
questions (likert scale) were taken to reduce the variability. For in depth information
open ended questions were also included while designing.
Sampling
In the above study stratified sampling was used under stratified sampling the population
is divided into several sub populations that are individually more homogeneous than the
total population (the different sub populations are called strata) and then we select item
from each stratum to constitute a sample.
Sample Size: 99
Sample Area: BSNL Bijnor
Limitations
Since BSNL is a multi-disciplinary and multi-work center organization (scattered all
over the country) it becomes very difficult to include employees from all disciplines, all
over the work centers and all levels in the study. However, attempt has been made to
include persons of different disciplines and different levels working in BSNL, Bijnor.
Findings of the study are based on trustworthiness of the information supplied by the
respondent, which may be inaccurate, subject to biases because of the survey conducted
of different levels in the organization.
As sample size is too small comprising of 99 respondents for a vast organization of
employees the data may not be a true representative.
DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION
Performance appraisal is an important tool to evaluate performance of employee in
BSNL.
20%
53%
13%
13%
Strongly AgreeAgreeNeutralDisagreeStrongly Disagree
Fig.1
Over the analysis of performance appraisal system is an important tool to evaluate
performance of the employee in BSNL out of 20 respondents, 20% of the respondents
were ‘strongly agree’, 54% of the them were ‘agree’, 13% of the respondents each were
‘neutral’ and ‘disagree’ and none of the respondent was strongly disagree.
The objective of appraisal system are clear to all employees
7
13
60
20
Strongly AgreeAgreeNeutraldisagreeStrongly Disagree
Fig.2
Over the analysis of objective of appraisal system are clear to all employees out of 20
respondents, 7% of the respondents were ‘strongly agree’, 13% of the them were ‘agree’,
none of the respondents each were ‘neutral’ 60% of the respondents were ‘disagree’ and
20% of the respondent were ‘strongly disagree’.
Appraisal system in BSNL ensures that that every individual is clearly aware about its
functions and responsibilities
66
20
77
Strongly AgreeAgreeNeutraldisagreeStrongly Disagree
Fig. 3
Over the analysis of Appraisal system in BSNL ensures that that every individual is
clearly aware about its functions and responsibilities out of 20 respondents, 60% of the
respondents were ‘strongly agree’, 20% of the them were ‘agree’, 7% of the respondents
each were ‘neutral’ 7% of the respondents were ‘disagree’ and none of the respondents
were ‘strongly disagree’.
Performance appraisal system in BSNL provides a platform for identifying training
needs of employees
7%7%
13%
20%
53%
Strongly AgreeAgreeNeutraldisagreeStrongly Disagree
Fig. 4
Over the analysis of Performance appraisal system in BSNL provides a platform for
identifying training needs of employees, out of 20 respondents 7% of the respondents
were ‘strongly agree’, 7% of the them were ‘agree’, 13% of the respondents were
‘neutral’ 20% of the respondents were ‘disagree’ and 53% of the respondents were
‘strongly disagree’.
The counseling is satisfactorily done to judge the low performance and to improve his/
her performance.
13
20
47
13
7
Strongly AgreeAgreeNeutraldisagreeStrongly Disagree
Fig. 5
Over the analysis of The counseling is satisfactorily done to judge the low performance
and to improve his/ her performance, out of 20 respondents 13% of the respondents were
‘strongly agree’, 20% of the them were ‘agree’, 47% of the respondents each were
‘neutral’ 13% of the respondents were ‘disagree’ and 7% of the respondents were
‘strongly disagree’.
Most of the training programme are initiated after a need analysis has indicated that
programme is needed
13%
7%
7%
13%
60%
Strongly AgreeAgreeNeutraldisagreeStrongly Disagree
Fig. 6
Over the analysis of Most of the training programme are initiated after a need analysis
has indicated that programme is needed, out of 20 respondents 13% of the respondents
were ‘strongly agree’, 7% of the them were ‘agree’, 7% of the respondents were ‘neutral’
13% of the respondents were ‘disagree’ and 60% of the respondents were ‘strongly
disagree’.
The present performance appraisal system is able to focus on personality trait of
employees for better performance
20
7
1353
7
Strongly AgreeAgreeNeutraldisagreeStrongly Disagree
Fig. 7
Over the analysis of The present performance appraisal system is able to focus on
personality trait of employees for better performance, out of 20 respondents 20% of the
respondents were ‘strongly agree’, 7% of the them were ‘agree’, 13% of the respondents
each were ‘neutral’ 53% of the respondents were ‘disagree’ and 7% of the respondents
were ‘strongly disagree’.
Performance is the main objective of performance appraisal in BSNL
40
40
7
76
Strongly AgreeAgreeNeutraldisagreeStrongly Disagree
Fig. 8
Over the analysis of Performance is the main objective of performance appraisal in
BSNL, out of 20 respondents 40% of the respondents were ‘strongly agree’, 40% of the
them were ‘agree’, 7% of the respondents each were ‘neutral’ 7% of the respondents
were ‘disagree’ and 7% of the respondents were ‘strongly disagree’.
Promotion and rewards are a major factor in influencing performance if administered
objectively
27
47
13
13
Strongly AgreeAgreeNeutraldisagreeStrongly Disagree
Fig. 9
Over the analysis of Promotion and rewards are a major factor in influencing
performance if administered objectively, out of 20 respondents 27% of the respondents
were ‘strongly agree’, 47% of the them were ‘agree’, 13% of the respondents each were
‘neutral’ 13% of the respondents were ‘disagree’ and none of the respondents were
‘strongly disagree’.
Performance appraisal is carried out to assess the potential of employees to assign higher
responsibility and more task.
7%
13%
7%
27%
47% Strongly AgreeAgreeNeutraldisagreeStrongly Disagree
Fig. 10
Over the analysis of Performance appraisal is carried out to assess the potential of
employees to assign higher responsibility and more task, out of 20 respondents 7% of the
respondents were ‘strongly agree’, 13% of the them were ‘agree’, 7% of the respondents
each were ‘neutral’ 27% of the respondents were ‘disagree’ and 46% of the respondents
were ‘strongly disagree’.
Potential appraisal help in succession planning in BSNL
67
33
YesNo
Fig. 11
On the analysis over Potential appraisal help in succession planning in BSNL out of 20
respondents 67% of the respondents said ‘yes’ and 33% of the respondents said ‘no’.
Succession planning is implemented on the basis of feed back through potential appraisal
13
20
7
33
27
Strongly AgreeAgreeNeutralDisagreeStrongly Disagree
Fig. 12
Over the analysis of Succession planning is implemented on the basis of feed back
through potential appraisal, out of 20 respondents 13% of the respondents were ‘strongly
agree’, 20% of the them were ‘agree’, 7% of the respondents each were ‘neutral’ 33% of
the respondents were ‘disagree’ and 27% of the respondents were ‘strongly disagree’.
There should be potential appraisal once in a year and information should be given to
employees about their future prospects
27
46
13
77
Strongly AgreeAgreeNeutralDisagreeStrongly Disagree
Fig. 13
Over the analysis of There should be potential appraisal once in a year and information
should be given to employees about their future prospects, out of 20 respondents 27% of
the respondents were ‘strongly agree’, 46% of the them were ‘agree’, 13% of the
respondents each were ‘neutral’ 7% of the respondents were ‘disagree’ and 7% of the
respondents were ‘strongly disagree’.
The performance appraisal system strengthen the relationship between superior and
subordinate for better performance.
27
40
7
13
13
Strongly AgreeAgreeNeutralDisagreeStrongly Disagree
Fig. 14
Over the analysis of The performance appraisal system strengthen the relationship
between superior and subordinate for better performance., out of 20 respondents 27% of
the respondents were ‘strongly agree’, 40% of the them were ‘agree’, 7% of the
respondents were ‘neutral’ 13% each of the respondents were ‘disagree’ and ‘strongly
disagree’.
The appraisal system encourages open communication between each appraiser and
appraise through performance review.
21
40
13
13
13
Strongly AgreeAgreeNeutralDisagreeStrongly Disagree
Fig. 15
Over the analysis of The appraisal system encourages open communication between each
appraiser and appraise through performance review, out of 20 respondents 21% of the
respondents were ‘strongly agree’, 40% of the them were ‘agree’, 13% of the
respondents each were ‘neutral’ ,‘disagree’ and ‘strongly disagree’.
The appraisal system encourages the appraiser to have common understanding of all the
factors (individual, organizational & environmental) affecting the performance of the
appraise
27
40
20
13
Strongly AgreeAgreeNeutralDisagreeStrongly Disagree
Fig. 16
Over the analysis of The appraisal system encourages the appraiser to have common
understanding of all the factors (individual, organizational & environmental) affecting
the performance of the appraise, out of 20 respondents 27% of the respondents were
‘strongly agree’, 40% of the them were ‘agree’, none of the respondent was ‘neutral’
20% of the respondents were ‘disagree’ and 13% of the respondents were ‘strongly
disagree’.
Appraisal system facilities growth growth and learning in the organization both for
appraiser and apraisee
7
20
26
40
7
Strongly AgreeAgreeNeutralDisagreeStrongly Disagree
Fig. 17
Over the analysis of Appraisal system facilities growth and learning in the organization
both for appraiser and apraisee, out of 20 respondents 7% of the respondents were
‘strongly agree’, 20% of the them were ‘agree’, 26% of the respondents were ‘neutral’
40% of the respondents were ‘disagree’ and 7% of the respondents were ‘strongly
disagree’.
Performance appraisal in BSNL form basis for the human competencies.
13%
13%
13%
60%
Strongly AgreeAgreeNeutralDisagreeStrongly Disagree
Fig. 18
Over the analysis of Performance appraisal in BSNL form basis for the human
competencies, out of 20 respondents 14% of the respondents each were ‘strongly agree’,
13% of them were ‘agree’, none of the respondent was ‘neutral’ 13% of the respondents
were ‘disagree’ and 60% of the respondents were ‘strongly disagree’.
There is a need for further up gradation of performance appraisal format which addresses
the development needs of the employees
20
46
7
20
7
Strongly AgreeAgreeNeutralDisagreeStrongly Disagree
Fig. 19
Over the analysis of There is a need for further upgradation of performance appraisal
format which addresses the development needs of the employees, out of 20 respondents
20% of the respondents were ‘strongly agree’, 46% of the them were ‘agree’, 7% of the
respondents were ‘neutral’ 20% of the respondents were ‘disagree’ and 7% of the
respondents were ‘strongly disagree’.
Areas where this organization needs to improve for the appraisal system for more
continuous development of ewmployee and building a strong relationship.
40%
60%
YesNo
Fig 20
On the analysis for Areas where this organization needs to improve for the appraisal
system for more continuous development of ewmployee and building a strong
relationship out of 20 respondents, 60% of the respondents had given no responsew
while 40% of the respondents said that performance appraisal format in BSNL needs
upgradation for the development needs of the employees with the fast changing business
environment and also it should focus on the identification of the training needs of the
employees.
Group 2
Performance appraisal is an important tool to evaluate performance of employee in
BSNL.
28%
56%
6%6% 4%
Strongly AgreeAgreeNeutralDisagreeStrongly Disagree
Fig.21
Over the analysis of performance appraisal system is an important tool to evaluate
performance of the employee in BSNL out of 60 respondents of group 2, 28% of the
respondents were ‘strongly agree’, 56% of the them were ‘agree’, 6% of the respondents
each were ‘neutral’ and ‘disagree’ and 4% of the respondent was strongly disagree.
The objective of appraisal system are clear to all employees
18%
10%
4%
46%
22%
Strongly AgreeAgreeNeutralDisagreeStrongly Disagree
Fig.22
Over the analysis of objective of appraisal system are clear to all employees, out of 60
respondents 18% of the respondents were ‘strongly agree’, 10% of the them were
‘agree’, 4% of the respondents were ‘neutral’ 46% of the respondents were ‘disagree’
and 22% of the respondent were ‘strongly disagree’.
Appraisal system in BSNL ensures that that every individual is clearly aware about its functions and responsibilities
54%
22%
2%
14%
8%
Strongly AgreeAgreeNeutralDisagreeStrongly Disagree
Fig. 23
Over the analysis of Appraisal system in BSNL ensures that that every individual is
clearly aware about its functions and responsibilities, out of 60 respondents 54% of the
respondents were ‘strongly agree’, 22% of the them were ‘agree’, 2% of the respondents
were ‘neutral’ 14% of the respondents were ‘disagree’ and 8% of the respondents were
‘strongly disagree’.
Performance appraisal system in BSNL provides a platform for identifying training
needs of employees
6%10%
8%
20%
56%
Strongly AgreeAgreeNeutralDisagreeStrongly Disagree
Fig. 24
Over the analysis of Performance appraisal system in BSNL provides a platform for
identifying training needs of employees, out of 60 respondents 6% of the respondents
were ‘strongly agree’, 10% of the them were ‘agree’, 8% of the respondents were
‘neutral’ 20% of the respondents were ‘disagree’ and 56% of the respondents were
‘strongly disagree’.
The counseling is satisfactorily done to judge the low performance and to improve his/
her performance.
10%
20%
48%
16%
6%
Strongly AgreeAgreeNeutralDisagreeStrongly Disagree
Fig. 25
Over the analysis of The counseling is satisfactorily done to judge the low performance
and to improve his/ her performance, out of 60 respondents 10% of the respondents were
‘strongly agree’, 20% of the them were ‘agree’, 48% of the respondents each were
‘neutral’ 16% of the respondents were ‘disagree’ and 6% of the respondents were
‘strongly disagree’.
Most of the training programme are initiated after a need analysis has indicated that
programme is needed
6%
14%
6%
22%
52%Strongly AgreeAgreeNeutralDisagreeStrongly Disagree
Fig. 26
Over the analysis of Most of the training programme are initiated after a need analysis
has indicated that programme is needed, out of 60 respondents 6% of the respondents
were ‘strongly agree’, 14% of the them were ‘agree’, 6% of the respondents were
‘neutral’ 22% of the respondents were ‘disagree’ and 52% of the respondents were
‘strongly disagree’.
The present performance appraisal system is able to focus on personality trait of employees for better performance
20%
10%
14%
46%
10%
Strongly AgreeAgreeNeutralDisagreeStrongly Disagree
Fig. 27
Over the analysis of The present performance appraisal system is able to focus on
personality trait of employees for better performance, out of 60 respondents 20% of the
respondents were ‘strongly agree’, 10% of the them were ‘agree’, 14% of the
respondents were ‘neutral’ 46% of the respondents were ‘disagree’ and 10% of the
respondents were ‘strongly disagree’.
Performance is the main objective of performance appraisal in BSNL
48%
34%
10%
8%
Strongly AgreeAgreeNeutralDisagreeStrongly Disagree
Fig. 28
Over the analysis of Performance is the main objective of performance appraisal in
BSNL, out of 60 respondents 48% of the respondents were ‘strongly agree’, 34% of the
them were ‘agree’, 10% of the respondents were ‘neutral’ 8% of the respondents were
‘disagree’ and none of the respondent was ‘strongly disagree’.
Promotion and rewards are a major factor in influencing performance if administered objectively
30%
38%
4%
22%
6%
Strongly AgreeAgreeNeutralDisagreeStrongly Disagree
Fig. 29
Over the analysis of Promotion and rewards are a major factor in influencing
performance if administered objectively, out of 60 respondents 30% of the respondents
were ‘strongly agree’, 38% of the them were ‘agree’, 4% of the respondents were
‘neutral’ 22% of the respondents were ‘disagree’ and 6% of the respondents were
‘strongly disagree’.
Performance appraisal is carried out to assess the potential of employees to assign higher
responsibility and more task.
10%
10%
6%
20%
54%
Strongly AgreeAgreeNeutralDisagreeStrongly Disagree
Fig. 30
Over the analysis of Performance appraisal is carried out to assess the potential of
employees to assign higher responsibility and more task, out of 60 respondents 10% of
the respondents each were ‘strongly agree’, and ‘agree’, 6% of the respondents were
‘neutral’ 20% of the respondents were ‘disagree’ and 54% of the respondents were
‘strongly disagree’.
Potential appraisal help in succession planning in BSNL
64%
36%
YesNo
Fig. 31
On the analysis over Potential appraisal help in succession planning in BSNL out of 60
respondents 64% of the respondents said ‘yes’ and 36% of the respondents said ‘no’.
Succession planning is implemented on the basis of feed back through potential appraisal
4%8%
26%
38%
24%
Strongly AgreeAgreeNeutralDisagreeStrongly Disagree
Fig. 32
Over the analysis of Succession planning is implemented on the basis of feed back
through potential appraisal, out of 60 respondents 4% of the respondents were ‘strongly
agree’, 8% of the them were ‘agree’, 26% of the respondents were ‘neutral’ 38% of the
respondents were ‘disagree’ and 24% of the respondents were ‘strongly disagree’.
There should be potential appraisal once in a year and information should be given to employees about their future prospects
26%
52%
12%
6% 4%
Strongly AgreeAgreeNeutralDisagreeStrongly Disagree
Fig. 33
Over the analysis of There should be potential appraisal once in a year and information
should be given to employees about their future prospects, out of 60 respondents 26% of
the respondents were ‘strongly agree’, 52% of the them were ‘agree’, 12% of the
respondents were ‘neutral’ 6% of the respondents were ‘disagree’ and 4% of the
respondents were ‘strongly disagree’.
The performance appraisal system strengthen the relationship between superior and
subordinate for better performance.
22%
40%
8%
16%
14%
Strongly AgreeAgreeNeutralDisagreeStrongly Disagree
Fig. 34
Over the analysis of The performance appraisal system strengthen the relationship
between superior and subordinate for better performance., out of 60 respondents 22% of
the respondents were ‘strongly agree’, 40% of the them were ‘agree’, 8% of the
respondents were ‘neutral’ 16% of the respondents were ‘disagree’ and 14% of the
respondents were ‘strongly disagree’.
The appraisal system encourages open communication between each appraiser and
appraise through performance review.
26%
36%
4%
18%
16%
Strongly AgreeAgreeNeutralDisagreeStrongly Disagree
Fig. 35
Over the analysis of The appraisal system encourages open communication between each
appraiser and appraise through performance review, out of 60 respondents 26% of the
respondents were ‘strongly agree’, 36% of the them were ‘agree’, 4% of the respondents
were ‘neutral’ , 18% of them were ‘disagree’ and 16% of the respondents were ‘strongly
disagree’.
The appraisal system encourages the appraiser to have common understanding of all the
factors (individual, organizational & environmental) affecting the performance of the
appraise
6%8%
10%
26%
50% Strongly AgreeAgreeNeutralDisagreeStrongly Disagree
Fig. 36
Over the analysis of The appraisal system encourages the appraiser to have common
understanding of all the factors (individual, organizational & environmental) affecting
the performance of the appraise, out of 60 respondents 6% of the respondents were
‘strongly agree’, 8% of the them were ‘agree’, 10% of the respondents were ‘neutral’
26% of the respondents were ‘disagree’ and 50% of the respondents were ‘strongly
disagree’.
Appraisal system facilities growth and learning in the organization both for appraiser and
apraisee
4%10%
28%
48%
10%
Strongly AgreeAgreeNeutralDisagreeStrongly Disagree
Fig. 37
Over the analysis of Appraisal system facilities growth and learning in the organization
both for appraiser and apraisee, out of 60 respondents 4% of the respondents were
‘strongly agree’, 10% of the them were ‘agree’, 28% of the respondents were ‘neutral’
48% of the respondents were ‘disagree’ and 10% of the respondents were ‘strongly
disagree’.
Performance appraisal in BSNL form basis for the human competencies.
2% 4% 4%
54%
36%
Strongly AgreeAgreeNeutralDisagreeStrongly Disagree
Fig. 38
Over the analysis of Performance appraisal in BSNL form basis for the human
competencies, out of 60 respondents 2% of the respondents were ‘strongly agree’, 4%
each of them were ‘agree’, and ‘neutral’, 54% of the respondents were ‘disagree’ and
36% of the respondents were ‘strongly disagree’.
There is a need for further up gradation of performance appraisal format which addresses
the development needs of the employees
26%
50%
2%
18%
4%
Strongly AgreeAgreeNeutralDisagreeStrongly Disagree
Fig. 39
Over the analysis of There is a need for further upgradation of performance appraisal
format which addresses the development needs of the employees, out of 60 respondents
26% of the respondents were ‘strongly agree’, 50% of the them were ‘agree’, 2% of the
respondents were ‘neutral’ 18% of the respondents were ‘disagree’ and 4% of the
respondents were ‘strongly disagree’.
Areas where this organization needs to improve for the appraisal system for more continuous development of ewmployee and building a strong relationship.
36%
64%
YesNo
Fig 40
On the analysis over Areas where this organization needs to improve for the
appraisal system for more continuous development of ewmployee and building a
strong relationship out of 60 respondents, 64% of the respondents gave no reply
while 36% said that trainng needs should be workeed out from the development
programme of the organization on the basis of market needs and trend and
training planningf asnd development process should be implemented.
Group 3
Performance appraisal is an important tool to evaluate performance of employee in BSNL.
19%
50%
6%
19%
6%
Strongly AgreeAgreeNeutralDisagreeStrongly Disagree
Fig.41
Over the analysis of performance appraisal system is an important tool to evaluate
performance of the employee in BSNL out of 20 respondents of group 3, 19% of the
respondents were ‘strongly agree’, 50% of them were ‘agree’, 6% of the respondents
were ‘neutral’, 19% of them were ‘disagree’ and 6% of the respondents were ‘strongly
disagree’.
The objectives of appraisal system are clear to all employees
7%13%
7%
60%
13%
Strongly AgreeAgreeNeutralDisagreeStrongly Disagree
Fig.42
Over the analysis of objective of appraisal system are clear to all employees, out of 20
respondents 7% of the respondents were ‘strongly agree’, 13% of them were ‘agree’, 7%
of the respondents were ‘neutral’ 60% of the respondents were ‘disagree’ and 13% of
the respondent were ‘strongly disagree’.
Appraisal system in BSNL ensures that that every individual is clearly aware about its
functions and responsibilities
53%
20%
7%
13%
7%
Strongly AgreeAgreeNeutralDisagreeStrongly Disagree
Fig. 43
Over the analysis of Appraisal system in BSNL ensures that that every individual is
clearly aware about its functions and responsibilities, out of 20 respondents 53% of the
respondents were ‘strongly agree’, 20% of the them were ‘agree’, 7% of the respondents
were ‘neutral’ 13% of the respondents were ‘disagree’ and 7% of the respondents were
‘strongly disagree’.
Performance appraisal system in BSNL provides a platform for identifying training needs of employees
13%
13%
20%
53%Strongly AgreeAgreeNeutralDisagreeStrongly Disagree
Fig. 44
Over the analysis of Performance appraisal system in BSNL provides a platform for
identifying training needs of employees, out of 20 respondents none of the respondents
were ‘strongly agree’, 13% each of the them were ‘agree’, and ‘neutral’ 20% of the
respondents each were ‘disagree’ and 54% of the respondents were ‘strongly disagree’.
The counseling is satisfactorily done to judge the low performance and to improve his/
her performance.
13%
20%
47%
13%
7%
Strongly AgreeAgreeNeutralDisagreeStrongly Disagree
Fig. 45
Over the analysis of The counseling is satisfactorily done to judge the low performance
and to improve his/ her performance, out of 20 respondents 13% of the respondents were
‘strongly agree’, 20% of the them were ‘agree’, 47% of the respondents were ‘neutral’
13% of the respondents were ‘disagree’ and 7% of the respondents were ‘strongly
disagree’.
Most of the training programme are initiated after a need analysis has indicated that
programme is needed
7%7%
20%
20%
47%Strongly AgreeAgreeNeutralDisagreeStrongly Disagree
Fig. 46
Over the analysis of Most of the training programme are initiated after a need analysis
has indicated that programme is needed, out of 20 respondents 7% of the respondents
each were ‘strongly agree’ and ‘agree’, 20% each of them were ‘neutral’, and ‘disagree’
and 46% of the respondents were ‘strongly disagree’.
The present performance appraisal system is able to focus on personality trait of
employees for better performance
27%
7%
13%
47%
7%
Strongly AgreeAgreeNeutralDisagreeStrongly Disagree
Fig. 47
Over the analysis of The present performance appraisal system is able to focus on
personality trait of employees for better performance, out of 20 respondents 27% of the
respondents were ‘strongly agree’, 7% of the them were ‘agree’, 13% of the respondents
were ‘neutral’ 46% of the respondents were ‘disagree’ and 7% of the respondents were
‘strongly disagree’.
Performance is the main objective of performance appraisal in BSNL
40%
40%
13%
7%
Strongly AgreeAgreeNeutralDisagreeStrongly Disagree
Fig. 48
Over the analysis of Performance is the main objective of performance appraisal in
BSNL, out of 20 respondents 40% of the respondents each were ‘strongly agree’, and
‘agree’, 13% of the respondents were ‘neutral’ 7% of the respondents were ‘disagree’
and none of the respondent was ‘strongly disagree’.
Promotion and rewards are a major factor in influencing performance if administered objectively
27%
47%
13%
7%7%
Strongly AgreeAgreeNeutralDisagreeStrongly Disagree
Fig. 49
Over the analysis of Promotion and rewards are a major factor in influencing
performance if administered objectively, out of 20 respondents 27% of the respondents
were ‘strongly agree’, 46% of the them were ‘agree’, 13% of the respondents were
‘neutral’ 7% of the respondents each were ‘disagree’ and ‘strongly disagree’.
Performance appraisal is carried out to assess the potential of employees to assign higher
responsibility and more task.
7%
13%
13%
7%
60%
Strongly AgreeAgreeNeutralDisagreeStrongly Disagree
Fig. 50
Over the analysis of Performance appraisal is carried out to assess the potential of
employees to assign higher responsibility and more task, out of 20 respondents 7% of the
respondents were ‘strongly agree’, 13% each of the them were ‘agree’ and ‘neutral’ 7%
of the respondents were ‘disagree’ and 60% of the respondents were ‘strongly disagree’.
Potential appraisal help in succession planning in BSNL
73%
27%
YesNo
Fig. 51
On the analysis over Potential appraisal help in succession planning in BSNL out of 20
respondents 73% of the respondents said ‘yes’ and 27% of the respondents said ‘no’.
Succession planning is implemented on the basis of feedback through potential appraisal
13%
20%
7%
33%
27%
Strongly AgreeAgreeNeutralDisagreeStrongly Disagree
Fig. 52
Over the analysis of Succession planning is implemented on the basis of feedback
through potential appraisal, out of 20 respondents 13% of the respondents were ‘strongly
agree’, 20% of the them were ‘agree’, 7% of the respondents were ‘neutral’ 33% of the
respondents were ‘disagree’ and 27% of the respondents were ‘strongly disagree’.
There should be potential appraisal once in a year and information should be given to employees about their future prospects
27%
40%
13%
13%
7%
Strongly AgreeAgreeNeutralDisagreeStrongly Disagree
Fig. 53
Over the analysis of There should be potential appraisal once in a year and information
should be given to employees about their future prospects, out of 20 respondents 27% of
the respondents were ‘strongly agree’, 40% of the them were ‘agree’, 13% of the
respondents were ‘neutral’ 13% of the respondents were ‘disagree’ and 7% of the
respondents were ‘strongly disagree’.
The performance appraisal system strengthen the relationship between superior and
subordinate for better performance.
27%
47%
13%
13%
Strongly AgreeAgreeNeutralDisagreeStrongly Disagree
Fig. 54
Over the analysis of The performance appraisal system strengthen the relationship
between superior and subordinate for better performance., out of 20 respondents 27% of
the respondents were ‘strongly agree’, 47% of the them were ‘agree’, none of the
respondent was ‘neutral’ and 13% of the respondents each were ‘disagree’ and ‘strongly
disagree’.
The appraisal system encourages open communication between each appraiser and
appraise through performance review.
20%
47%
20%
13%
Strongly AgreeAgreeNeutralDisagreeStrongly Disagree
Fig. 55
Over the analysis of The appraisal system encourages open communication between each
appraiser and appraise through performance review, out of 20 respondents 20% of the
respondents were ‘strongly agree’, 47% of the them were ‘agree’, 20% of the
respondents were ‘neutral’ , 13% of them were ‘disagree’ and none of the respondent
was ‘strongly disagree’.
The appraisal system encourages the appraiser to have common understanding of all the
factors (individual, organizational & environmental) affecting the performance of the
appraise
20%
13%
20%
47%Strongly AgreeAgreeNeutralDisagreeStrongly Disagree
Fig. 56
Over the analysis of The appraisal system encourages the appraiser to have common
understanding of all the factors (individual, organizational & environmental) affecting
the performance of the appraise, out of 20 respondents none of the respondents were
‘strongly agree’, 20% of the them were ‘agree’, 13% of the respondents were ‘neutral’
20% of the respondents were ‘disagree’ and 47% of the respondents were ‘strongly
disagree’.
Appraisal system facilities growth growth and learning in the organization both for
appraiser and apraisee
7%
20%
27%
40%
7%
Strongly AgreeAgreeNeutralDisagreeStrongly Disagree
Fig. 57
Over the analysis of Appraisal system facilities growth and learning in the organization
both for appraiser and apraisee, out of 20 respondents 6% of the respondents were
‘strongly agree’, 20% of them were ‘agree’, 27% of the respondents were ‘neutral’ 40%
of the respondents were ‘disagree’ and 7% of the respondents were ‘strongly disagree’.
Performance appraisal in BSNL form basis for the human competencies.
7%
13%
27%
53%
Strongly AgreeAgreeNeutralDisagreeStrongly Disagree
Fig. 58
Over the analysis of Performance appraisal in BSNL form basis for the human
competencies, out of 20 respondents 7% of the respondents each were ‘strongly agree’,
13% of them were ‘agree’, none of the respondents were ‘neutral’, 27% of the
respondents were ‘disagree’ and 53% of the respondents were ‘strongly disagree’.
There is a need for further up gradation of performance appraisal format which addresses
the development needs of the employees
20%
47%
7%
20%
7%
Strongly AgreeAgreeNeutralDisagreeStrongly Disagree
Fig. 59
Over the analysis of There is a need for further upgradation of performance appraisal
format which addresses the development needs of the employees, out of 20 respondents
20% of the respondents were ‘strongly agree’, 46% of the them were ‘agree’, 7% of the
respondents were ‘neutral’ 20% of the respondents were ‘disagree’ and 7% of the
respondents were ‘strongly disagree’.
Areas where this organization needs to improve for the appraisal system for more continuous development of ewmployee and building a strong relationship.
33%
67%
YesNo
Fig 60
On the analysis over Areas where this organization needs to improve for the appraisal system for more continuous development of ewmployee and building a strong relationship 67% of the respondents gave no reply whereas 33% of the respondents said that the concept of potential appraisal may be implemented and the exercise for this may be undertaken once in 3-4 years.
CONCLUSION
The study was carried over the performance appraisal system and on the analysis
of the respondents of all the three groups it was concluded that most of the
employees were in the favour that Performance appraisal is an important tool to
evaluate performance of employee in BSNL.
On the analysis over the objective of appraisal system are clear to all employees it
was concluded that the respondents of group 1 and group 3 were not clear of the
objectives of appraisal system while the respondents of group 2 are still aware of
the objectives of appraisal system.
The respondents of all the three groups on analyzing favoured that Appraisal
system in BSNL ensures that every individual is clearly aware about its functions
and responsibilities.
It was also analyzed that the respondents of all the three groups does not feel that
Performance appraisal system in BSNL provides a platform for identifying
training needs of employees.
While on the analysis all the respondents of the three groups were almost in the
favour that the counseling is satisfactorily done to judge the low performance and
to improve his/ her performance.
On the analysis over most of the training programme are initiated after a need
analysis has indicated that programme is needed it was concluded that all the
respondents have denied over it.
It was analyzed that the respondents of all the three groups were in the favour that
promotion s the main objective of appraisal in BSNL.
The respondents of all the three groups were not in the favour that succession
planning is implemented on the basis of feedback through potential appraisal.
On the analysis most of the respondents were in the opinion that there should be
potential appraisal once in a year and information should be given to employees
about their future prospects.
Most of the employees when analyzed on the performance appraisal system
strengthen the relationship between superior and subordinate for better
performance gave no opinion.
On the analysis over the appraisal system encourages open communication
between each appraiser and appraise through performance review it was
concluded that most of the respondents were in the opinion over this.
SUGGESTIONS
Promotions should be given to the employees at the scheduled intervals and to the
employees who deserve it.
Rewards should also be provided to the employees who have done outstanding
jobs in their field.
Performance appraisal system should be implied seriously and potential appraisal
for the employees should be carried out at least once in in a year.
Training schedules for the employees should be conducted at regular intervals and
not only when it is required.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
K. Ashwathappa-“Human Resource and Personnel Management”, The McGraw-Hill companies, 4th Edition.
VSP Rao-“Human Resource management”, Prof. N.J.Yasaswy, 1st Edition.
Kothari C.R-“Research Methodology-Methods and Techniques”- New Age International (P) Limited, 2nd Edition.
Journals
HR Vision 2005 (BSNL) HRM Corporate Journal
BSNL Quarterly in house Journal on HR.
WEBSITES
www.bsnl.co.in