Upload
vuongdiep
View
213
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Perceived Weather Anomalies and Climate Change:
Community Based Adaptation Practices in Sustaining
Natural Resources and Livelihoods by Tribal Communities
of Arunachal Pradesh, Eastern Himalaya
Ranjay K. Singh & Arun AgrawalIFRI, SNRE, UM, MI, USA
Email:[email protected]
Objectives of study
1. To assess the people’s perception and knowledge onweather anomalies and climate change among Adi(living in subtropical ecosystem) and Monpa (living insub-temperate to temperate ecosystems) communities,and
2. 2. To explore traditional knowledge led communitybased adaptation practices of Adi and Monpacommunities.
Known floral biodiversity of Arunachal Pradesh
Only known plant
speciesNo. of species
Rhododendrons 52
Hedychium species 18
Oaks 16
Gymnosperms 29
Bamboo 35
Canes 20
Orchids 550
Medicinal plants 500
Pteridophytes 452
Bryophytes 60
Lichens 80
Source: Arunachal Pradesh State Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan,State Forest Research Institute, 2002. Statistical Report- 1999-2000,Department of Environment and Forest, Arunachal Pradesh.S
tate
is f
am
ou
s f
or
na
tive
orc
hid
bio
div
ers
ity
Ecosystems and ethnic diversity► Tropical: About 22.0 %► Sub-tropical: About 42.0%► Temperate: About 12.0 %► Sub-temperate: About 18.0 %► Alpine: About 6.0 %
Interactions with
nature (opportunity)
26 tribes 110 ethnic groups
Dependence on NR
Remote located
(Constraints)
Compulsive
location
specific
learning
& knowledge
Diversity in
biocultural
knowledge
Basic foundation for
subsistence living and
conserving biodiversity
Livelihoods & food
security
Rich in knowledge
& ecological ethicsPoor in economys
Research Methodology
► State: Arunachal Pradesh (eastern Himalaya)► Districts: East Siang and West Kameng► Community: Adi and Monpa► Sampling procedure: Purposive and random both► No of villages: 22 of Adi, 7 of Monpa► No of sample: 660 Adi and 252 MonpaMethod of data collection:1. Personal interview2. FGDs3. Village workshops (600 members with mean 21)4. Participant observations5. Case study method6. Regional and national seminars for social verification and SWOT analysisApproach: Exploratory research design with qualitative and quantitative data-
set
Study areas
Results: Community perception about weather anomalies andclimate change
A B C D E F G H I JAdi 85.21 68.9 89.4 79.5 85.6 55.25 49.8 55.3 72.9 28.4Monpa 92.3 58.3 78.2 68.2 91.6 69.3 54.2 51.3 79.6 21.7
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Mul
tiple
resp
onse
%
A= Normal rainfall has declined over last 15-20 yearsB= Onset of rainfall has become lateC= Onset of rainfall has become erraticD= Effective rains period became unpredictableE= Weather has become warmer F= Duration of cold is decreasedG= Snowfall at the mountain peaks are decreasedH= Frequency of storms are increasedI= Seasonal changes and inter-annual variationsJ= There is no change in weather or climate
Perception of Monpa and Adi communities about causes of
weather anomalies and perceived climate change
A= Destruction of ecology through commercial cropsB= Dishonoring mountain and community forest resourcesC= Erosion of eco-cultural ethics among younger generationD= Inappropriate government policies E= Materialistic culture which cause harm to natureF= Privatization of communal resourcesG= Opting homogenous livelihood options instead of diversified H= Polluting sacred mountain (Lu, Mani, etc.) and sacred forestsI= Replacing traditional ways of people survival strategies
A B C D E F G H IAdi 64.1 69.2 85.4 52.6 56.9 40.2 69.8 38.4 71.9Monpa 57.3 72.5 78.9 41.2 78.3 57.6 86.7 61.3 90.4
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Mul
tiple
Res
pons
e %
Ecological changes to landscape observed by communities
Aspects of ecological changes Adi MonpaMore hazardous events caused in poor fertility of soilsdue to either drought or heavy rains
76.4 68.8
Frequent land slide due to excessive rains in few hours 79.3 70.4Frequent land slide causing to make agricultural forestfields more labor demanding job
89.4 78.6
Frequent land slide posing threats to local flora andfauna
48.4 42.9
Community rivers and regional rivers have become moredevastating
65.8 59.3
The aquatic biodiversity are declining due to rapidcourse changes and silts in rivers and lakes
44.3 38.9
Some of keystone species used in food andethnomedicinal webs are at threat (like Gymnocladus
assamicus, G. Burmanicus, Cordyceps sinensis and
Aconiume ferox
65.9 42.7
Grazing lands are become unproductive gradually 39.4 78.9* Multiple response percentage
Perception of hunters about hunting in weather anomalies&extreme conditions
Perception Adi Monpa
During excessive rain/flood, some animals change their natural track in forest
75.3 63.2
During excessive rain/flood, the trained dogs team get more trouble and problem in forest to chase animals
84.5 69.4
It’s risky during the excessive rain to have hunting 96.4 86.1
Problem of setting hunting points in the forest 89.3 77.5Landslide blocks path of migration of animals, sometimes could cause accidents to hunters
62.8 43.8
Dynamics of grazing and habitation ground of wild animals during droughtperiod gets disturbed
79.6 55.8
Need to spent more time and energy for planning and hunting of animals 86.8 50.5Elders cannot become part of hunting team during excessive rain- who are master of hunting strategy
70.2 65.3
Due to lack of elders’ participation, the amount of hunts from forest become meager
66.8 59.3
* Multiple response percentage
Perceived compounded social and climatic changes:
Impact on biodiversity, food systems and livelihoods
Perceived social and climatic changes and its impact on:1.Threats to culture loss2.Threats to biocultural diversity (knowledge and languageloss)3.Threats to loss of indigenous institutions (e.g. Dere)4.Negative effects on the natural resource and traditionallivelihoods5.Ecosystems’ degradation:- important for hunting, gathering,fishing, herding, bartering, etc.6.Threat to local hydrology7.Increased vulnerability to drought, flood, weather anomalies8.Shortages of food, fuel or water, which in turn promptsmigration away from traditional lands
Kebung: Ratufa sp.
Compounded impact on biocultural
resources
1. Hornbill (Buceros hydrocorax)2. Dekang (Gymnocladus burmanicus3. Emo (Aconite ferox)4. Kebungs (Five species of Ratufa)5. Ngopi and other indigenous fishes
Perceived compounded social and climatic changes: Impact on
biodiversity, food systems and livelihoods
Social and cultural changes
► Changes in food habit► Changes in hunting system► Changes in food cultivation and gathering
systems► Changes in conservation practices of
biocultural resources (traditional fermentation of bamboo shoots in forest’s water stream)
► Changes in learning institutions (nuclear family, loss of Dere)
Climate change impact on cultural food diversity
► Exploring experiences and ground truth aboutclimate change impact on cultural foods
Examples: We found changes in fermented foods► Exposure to UV for 5 min indicated maximum
reduction of yeast population (up to 47%) anddrastically affected the colony characters innamdung (Pyrilla ocimoides) and ngosing(ngopi – indigenous fish base) among thefermented food products.
► Yeast despite its mesophilic nature positivelyresponded to low temperature but exhibitedpopulation decline to a greater degree whenexposed to UV ray for 5 and 15 min in namdungand ngosing.
Community based adaptation strategies of Monpa & Adi
communities to cope-up with extreme weather & sustain
livelihoods
Perception Adi Monpa
Forming group (Reglep among Adi tribe and Mila among Monpa tribe) to maketraditional dresses for sale and income generation
91.2 84.5
Collective collection of plant resources from morang (community forest) andhomegardens (cane, bamboo and creepers) for making handicrafts for sale andincome generation
89.5 78.4
Collective food processing from surplus food resources preserved in last season toadd traditional values and sale in local market for income
76.9 70.5
Collective harvesting and collection of ethnobotanicals from community forest andhomegardens to sale in local market and share the benefits
69.8 74.5
Forming self help groups and establishing micro-enterprises (making bambooshoots, pickle from forest products) and earnings
80.2 76.8
Forming self help groups and collective purchasing of culturally important itemssuch as cloths, handicrafts, beads, etc. and selling for collective income
67.8 59.8
Forming Reglep/Mila and collective raring of chickens, ducks and pigs for selffoods and selling for income
59.3 55.8
Forming Reglep/Mila to have barter system to exchange foods and otherculturally important items for promoting livelihoods
68.5 72.5
* Multiple response percentage
TK led CBAPs cropping systems among Adi and Monpa tribesS. N. Traditional knowledge and adaptation practices of farming systems Adaptive %
Adi Monpa
1.0 Relay cropping systems1.1 Phaphda (Fagopyrum esculentum) followed by maize 00.0 95.0
1.2 Maize followed by paddy 48.0 00.0
2.0 Micro-ecosystem based cropping systems:2.1 Barley + field pea; wheat + field pea 00.0 85.5
2.2 Finger millet (Elcusine coracocna) + amaranthus species + field pea 00.0 57.8
2.3 Finger millet in selective patches 44.1 52.3
2.4 Foxtail millet (Setaria italica) in selective patches 38.2 47.2
2.3 Soybean + maize + cucurbit crops 00.0 48.5
2.4 Low land paddy followed by maize crop 00.0 30.5
2.5 Rainfed rice (in jhum field)* + beans + cucurbit crops + ethnobotanicals; rainfed rice + beans + beans 85.5 00.0
2.6 Rainfed rice (in jhum field) + soybean + solanaceous species + ethnobotanicals 82.8 00.0
2.7 Low land paddy 45.8 00.0
3.0 Micro ecosystem based inter-cropping:3.1 Bathua (Chenapodeum album) with phaphda 00.0 45.5
3.2 Phaphda with rajma bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) and or field pea in gravelly and sloppy soils 00.0 50.5
4.0 Planting living fence species on crops’ boundary to avoid soil and water erosions:
4.1 Ogjok (Bauhinia variegata), bamboo species and toko-patta (Levistona jenkisiana) and citrus species 90.7 00.0
4.2 Timbur (Zanthoxylum americanum), bamboo species, local peach, plum and almond on crops’ boundary to avoid soiland water erosions
00.0 72.5
5.0 Traditional organic practices of crop and pest and disease management practices which are ecologically viable andeconomically feasible
95.2 96.6
6.0 Adding more organic matter in soil and applying mulch 79.6 98.5
7.0 Intercropping with perennial woody tree species in between the crops 70.8 12.5
8.0 Maintaining community seed banks of indigenous crops species and varieties9.0 Selection of patches in land slopes according to nature of crops and their demand in relation to moisture and fertility
gradient925.9 85.7
10.0 Maintaining traditional water harvesting methods and sustain watershed in mountains 71.4 75.7
11.0 Using bamboo and wood made traditional agricultural tools and ensuring less exposure of soil to water and wind erosion 95.5 92.9
Adaptive diversified farming systems of Adi and Monpacommunities
Components of diversified farming systems Adi Monpa
Crops with piggery, yak (Bos …), sheep and poultry 70.3 00.0Crops with piggery, mithun (Bos frontalis), poultry, and duck 00.0 85.4Agriculture + horticulture- one (growing crops along withindigenous fruits species)
50.4 55.4
Agriculture + horticulture- two (growing crops along withindigenous species of vegetables
65.9 79.8
Agriculture + microenterprise with silkworm raring 38.4 00.0Agriculture + traditional weaving of cloths 85.4 55.5Agriculture + marketing of wild resources 45.8 25.7Agriculture + traditional hunting 40.5 20.4Agriculture + laboring 07.0 30.2Agriculture + traditional fishing 35.7 10.4Agriculture + making handicrafts 65.8 35.6Agriculture + making fishing net and tools (using indigenousplant species
12.6 03.8
* Multiple response percentage
Non-agricultural wild products used in food systems: Local
marketing by Adi women during normal & extreme climateIngredient/Food Availability in local
market
Peak
availability
Mean price (in Rs ) per Kg
Normal weather/
climate
Abnormal
weather/climate
A. Processed plant products
E-kung (fermented bamboo shoot, fresh) Year round Aug – Sept 42.5±2.9 66.7±4.6
E-peng (fermented bamboo shoot, sliced fresh) Year round Aug – Sept 34.6±1.8 56.5±4.7
E-yup (fermented bamboo shoot, dried) Year round Sept – Oct 62.7±3.8 84.8±3.9
Peron-namsing (fermented soybean) Year round Jan – Feb 41.9±2.9 54.6±3.1
B. Processed animals prodcuts
Ega-tapum (silk worm) May – July April – May 120.8±2.9 205.0±4.5
Engo (smoked fish) Year round June – July 252.4±2.5 404.80±5.4
Kebung (smoked squirrel) Jan – April March – April 250.5.0±4.5 350.4±5.8
Ngotar (sun dried fish) Year round April – May 150.8±3.7 305.6±3.9
Pumnger (caterpillars of Delonix sp.) May – Aug May – June 42.8±3.2 65.5±3.8
Tari (Aspongopus najus) Dec-Feb Nov – Dec 60.6±4.2 124.8±4.0
Tasum (smoked prawn) Year round June – July 82.0±4.7 154.5±5.9
C. Vegetables
Akshap (Mussenda roxburghii) Year round May-Sep 43.0±3.5 64.6±4.2
Bangko (Solanam spirale) Year round May-Sep 45.0±2.7 75.60±3.8
Dhekia saag (Diplazium esculentum) May-July June-July 55.4±3.0 85.4±4.5
Gam oying (Glochidion multilocular) April-Aug May-July 44.5±3.9 69.8±3.9
Kopii (Solanum torvum) April-Sep May-July 60.5±1.9 84.7±5.4
Kopiir (Solanum khasianum) April-Sep May-July 62.8±2.7 92.7±6.2
Marsang (Spilanthes acmella) Year round March – April 35.5±4.0 59.4±2.1
Onger (Zanthoxylum rhetsa) Year round April – May 65.6±3.0 90.4±1.9
Ongin (Clerodendrum colebrookianum) Year round Nov – Dec 61.8±4.2 85.9±3.3
Tapar (indigenous mushroom) April– July June – July 22.3±3.8 34.5±3.7
Tapil (Phoebe cooperians) Sept – Oct Sept – Oct 65.4±4.1 119.4±4.5
D. Fruits
Tadar (Nephelium lappaceum) May – June May – June 52.7±3.0 74.6±4.2
Anke (Castanopsis kurzii) July – Aug July – Aug 63.5±2.0 104.5±6.0
Sirang (Castanopsis indica) July – Aug July – Aug 60.0±1.8 119.5±3.5
Bureng (Quercus latifolia) July – Sept July – Aug 35.0±1.9 64.6±5.8
Belang (Artocarpus heterophyllus) May-Sep June-July 20.4±2.5 35.8±3.7
Av. 20 %
change in
market
price
Classical examples of CBAPs
► Community based paisang (Quercus griffithii) grove and ecosystem conservation for crops and livelihood continuation (Monpa tribe)
► Community based forest conservation management (Adi tribe)
► Collective cultivation of crops (Monpa tribe)
Indigenous agrobiodiversity in adaptation: Monpa tribeLocal name Botanical name Special attributes
Ada Zingiber officinale Grown with least use of waterAmaranthus Amaranthus caudatus Grown without waterBathua Chenopodium album Grown without waterBong with awns Hordeum vulgare Drought tolerantBong without awns
Hordeum vulgare Drought and disease tolerant
Broomsa peela Cucurbita moschata Disease tolerant and cultivated with least use of waterBroomsa saphed Benincasa hispida Disease tolerant and cultivated with least use of waterBundagmo bada Panicum psilopodium var.
coloratumDrought and disease tolerant
Bundagmo chhota Panicum psilopodium var. psilopodium
Drought and disease tolerant
Chong Allium cepa Disease tolerant and can be cultivated with least use of water
Chukandar Beta vulgaris Disease tolerant and can be cultivated with lest use of water
Haldi Curcuma longa Disease tolerant and can be cultivated with least use of water
Kaibandu Cucurbitaceous vegetable Drought tolerantKatili chaulai Amaranthus spinosus Drought tolerantLai Saag Brassica sp. Disease tolerant and can be cultivated with least use of
waterLal saag Amaranthus tricolor Drought and disease tolerantLau Lagenaria siceraria Drought and disease tolerantLee bada Glycine max Drought and disease tolerantLee choota Glycine max Drought and disease tolerantLeme Brassica sp. Disease tolerant and can be cultivated with least use of
waterLocal gehun Triticum aestivum Drought and disease tolerant
Continued……Mandua Elcusine coracocna Drought and disease tolerantMann bada Allium sp. Disease tolerant and can be cultivated with
lest use of waterMann Chhota Allium sp. Disease tolerant and can be cultivated with
least use of waterManthong Cucumis sativus Drought and disease tolerantMatar Pisum sativum Drought and disease tolerantMongoicha Solanum nigrum Drought tolerantMonpa lehsun lamm
Drought and disease tolerant
Penche Brassica sp. Disease tolerant and can be cultivated with least use of water
Phaphda meetha Polygonum fagopyrum Drought and disease tolerantPhaphda teeta Polygonum fagopyrum Drought and disease tolerantRajma Phaseolus vulgaris Drought and disease tolerantSakarkand Ipomoea batatas Drought and disease tolerantSem Lablab purpureus Drought and disease tolerantSolu Capsicum sp. Drought and disease tolerantSuran Amorphophallus
campanulatusDrought and disease tolerant
Taktak Spinacia oleracea Disease tolerant and can be cultivated with least use of water
Tamatar Solanum lycopersicum Drought and disease tolerantTimbur Zanthoxylum
americanumDrought and disease tolerant
Ush Coriandrum sativum Disease tolerant and can be cultivated with least use of water
Gender perspective of adaptation
35 4520 15
5
100
5540
18 15
6555
80 8595
0
4560
92 95
020406080
100120
Form
atio
n of
soci
al
capi
tals
Form
ing
info
rmal
in
stitu
tions
Div
ersi
fyin
g cr
oppi
ng
syst
emD
iver
sify
ing
farm
ing
syst
emPr
eser
vatio
n an
d sh
arin
g fo
ods
Hun
ting
mor
e
Fish
ing
mor
e
Acc
esin
g di
vers
e ed
ges
Mar
ketin
g of
wild
bi
ores
ourc
es
Bar
terin
gPer
cen
tag
e
Adaptation strategies
MenWomen
Generation perspective in adaptation
0
50
100
150
200
250
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N
YoungMiddle agedOld
Age groups: Total women 492; Young (n= 130) = 25-40 yrs, middle aged ((n= 195) = 41-56 yrs and old aged (n= 167) = 57 and aboveA= Increasing more rainfed crops in jhum landB= Domestication of wild plant resources in homegardenC= Diversifying food resources from various ecosystemsD= Preservation of surplus food resources through traditional practicesE= Strengthening bond with informal social institutions for sharing food resourcesF= Sharing of food and related biocultural information through barter systemG= Collective responsibilities and plan to bear risk in collection and storage of food resourcesH= Individual and collective conservation of seeds of plants for maintaining stock to grow next yearI= More fishing in community riverJ= Asking males of family to hunt more meat from community forest for preservationK= More harvesting of ethnobotanicals and food resources from community forestL= Increase percentage on less preferred food resourcesM= Teaching to young family members for sustainable use of food resourcesN= Contingency and long-term planning (at least for 6 months) for managing risk of foods
SWOT dimension of community based adaptation
practices (CBAPs)
Strengths
1. Most of CBAPs are ecologically feasible2. Most of CBAPs are economically viable3. Most of CBAPs are sustainable4. Compatible to social system5. Compatible to current environmental risk
Weaknesses
1. Highly micro-ecosystem specific2. Highly social system specific3. More gender specific4. Few CBAPs have less risk bearing capacity
Threats1. In projected high changes, few CBAPswill be vanished2. The populations living in sub-temperateand temperate ecosystems are morevulnerable3. Exclusively depend livelihoods will bemore vulnerable4. ABAPs related biodiversity will behighly threatened
Opportunities
1. Insights & developing scientific technology based on CBAPs2. Refinement and validation in few CBAP3. Transfer of CBAPs in similar other system where it does not exist4. Collaborations with formal sciences
(-)I
mp
ort
an
ce (
+)
(Ext
ent o
f rel
evan
ce a
nd im
med
iacy
)
(-) Ease/difficult of observation (+)
(Influenced by internal and external factors)
Typology of Knowledge Systems for Conservation and use in
Adaptation
► Community knowledge► Private/ individual knowledge► Group knowledge► Refined knowledge*
► Changes in these knowledge systems due to social and climatic factors
► Screening of best practices having potential to apply/being applied in climate change adaptation
* For knowing details of knowledge typology, see Singh et al. 2010
Conclusion► Communities are aware about the weather anomalies and climate changes.► Community define climatic variability through correlating historical facts and types of problems correlated with
environment, ecology and local livelihoods.► They define and perceive climatic variability or anomalies through the notations and experiences on plants and
animal behaviors.► Women got more knowledge and skill to develop community based adaptive practices than men through various
social, ecological and institutional processes.► Adaptation practices vary from one social system to another based on types of microecosystems and typology of
environmental risks.► Not necessarily all the adaptive practices are able and would be applicable to cope-up with high environmental
risks, however, few adaptive practices got logically considerable capacity such as use of paisang tree leaves,cultivating rainfed crops species and varieties, and using plant and animals species from varying ecosystem forfood security.
► These adaptations may be strengthened and promoted.► The community forest could be a part of REDD+ with proper incentives and monitoring with community
members► The sound practices and social capitals of community can be used in future adaptations planning and policies on
climate change.► Moreover, community based adaptive practices specially shown in case studies provide lessons and insights to
scientists for future work (Weatherhead et al. 2010) ) on those practices for their refinement, up-gradation,quantifications , and more importantly collaborations between scientists and local communities to work inparticipatory mode in ethical manner (Pearce et al., 2009).
► This is required for not only for coping-up future environmental risks but inclusive sustainable development too.► Climate change is also a social, economic and cultural phenomenon, and to have sustainable adaptations, the
perception, experiences and local knowledge of communities are much relevant depending upon their strengthand capacity to deal with types of climatic problems .
Acknowledgments
► Entire community members of Adi and Monpa tribes► Fulbright Commission, New Delhi and Washington DC to bring
me at University of Michigan► Prof Arun Agrawal and SNRE, UM for his technical and logistic
supports► University of Michigan to hosting me here for 4 months as
Fulbright Fellow► Audience to listen my talk
Dr Joséphine NADINGA/YAMEOGO. Agroecologist. CNRST/INERA/DPF
Dr Mamounata BELEM/OUEDRAOGO. Ethnobotaniste CNRST/INERA/DPF
BURKINA FASO
Dr Marie Claire MILLOGO. Sociologist. Ministry of Women Promotion. BURKINA
FASO
Mr Abdoul Karim OUEDRAOGO. Botanist. CNRST/INERA/DPF. BURKINA FASO
Women in the National Program for AdaptationActions to Climate Change in the villagesbordering the Biosphere Reserve of HipposPool in Burkina Faso, West Africa
INTRODUCTIONBurkina Faso has experienced major droughts, especially in 1965-1966, from 1972 -1974, 1981-1984, 1986-1987, in 1991-1992 and 1994-1995 (WMO, 1995; USHER, 1997).
These recurrent climatic crises led to an awakening of consciousness aboutvulnerability and adaptation to climate change. More than a dozen policydocuments and sectoral strategies were written and adopted officiallybetween 1995 and 2004 for the national resources management (CSLP, 2000;CONAGESE, 2001; PAGIRE, 2003; NAPA, 2007)
The world’s poor people are disproportionaly vulnerable to climate variability and change effects (Ribot et al., 2009)
Women have been identified among the most vulnerable groups and they are an essential link in the actors chain in the NAPA/Burkina Faso (NAPA, 2007). They are not passive but acting according to the recommendations of the NAPA. Sometimes indigenous people have knowledge which is not known and valued
Thus the present study has been initiated with the UNESCO-MAB financial support to attend the following objectives
Global objectiveTo examine the importance and
contribution of women in the implementation of NAPA, its recommendations in three
main sectors which are forestry, health, food safety
Specific Objective 3To identify actions for
food safety and poverty reduction
SpecificObjective 1To identify
women action in the
reduction of entropic
pressure on woody species
Specific Objective 2to identify the assets of local women in the
plants uses to treat diseases related to
climate change
OBJECTIVES
Western Burkina Faso :
between 11 ° 30 'and 11 °45' N and 04 ° 05 'and 04
° 12'W
19 200 ha with a relative
permanent pool of 660
ha.
South Sudanese Climate
(1000-1200 mm)
Great diversity of
landscapes and
environments
Bala, Bossora, Tiérako,
Sokourani, Padéma, Fina
Localization of the BRHP
THE SITE OF STUDY
Surveys: PAPoLD + Individual interviews + fields observation
The PAPoLD (Participatory Analysis of Poverty and Livelihood
Dynamics) was developed to analyze the dynamics of the farmers
socioeconomic status ie versus time (ICRAF, 2005)
This method is a tool for assessing the socioeconomic
conditions of farmers after an event related to climate change
More than 50% of women were interviewed in each village
Severity Index (NAPA, 2007): SI = 1 + (r-1) / (n-1)
r = rank of the shock in order of importance according to the
participant
n = total number of shocks listed by the participant
MATERIAL & METHODS
Nº Shocks felt according to women Severity01 Drought 1.202 Degradation of vegetation 1.203 Poverty 1.104 Early drying up of the rivers 1.3
05 Famine 1.406 Important temperature variation 1.307 Resurgence of diseases 1.408 Medicinal plant disappearance 1.409 Difficulties in wood access 1.510 Decrease of agricultural diversification 1.5
11 Bad distribution of rainfall 1.312 Decrease of soil fertility 1.513 Weakening of social cohesion 1.714 Decrease of fisheries 1.415 Violent winds 1.416 Animal mortalities 1.417 Human mortalities 1.618 Degradation of the river banks 1.419 Occurrence of predator insects of crops 1.5
RESULTS - DISCUSSION
Climate Change shocks according to Women at the BRHP
Group I : The most severe shocks .1<S<1.3
Group II : The mean severe shocks1.4<S<1.5
Group III : The less severe shocks1.6<S<2
These shocks are being experiencedacross Burkina Faso where actually,the temperatures can increase to morethan 42ºC. The projections give for thewhole country, an increase in averagetemperatures by 0.8 ° C by 2025 and1.7 ° C by 2050. The temperatureincreases are coupled with seasonalvariation, the months of December,January, August and September,becoming significantly warmer thanusual while the months of Novemberand March experience small increasesin heat (NAPA, 2007). About povertywomen are the most vulnerable (CSLP,2000).
N° Species Site of restorationAgfparklands
Forest/riverbanks
01 Adansonia digitata X02 Afzelia africana X X03 Anogeissus leiocarpus X X04 Bombax costatum X05 Ceiba pentandra X06 Cola cordifolia X07 Detarium microcarpum X X08 Elaeis guineensis X09 D. mespiliformis X10 Khaya senegalensis X11 Lannea microcarpa X12 Maerua angolensis X13 Paullinia pinnata X14 Parkia biglobosa X15 Piliostigma reticulatum X X16 Saba senegalensis X17 Sclerocarya birre X18 Strychnos spinosa X X19 Tamarindus indica X20 Vitellaria paradoxa X
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
PL DS NRA None
% o
f w
om
en
Method of restoration
ROLES OF WOMEN IN THE PLANT HERITAGE RENEWAL
The women of the RBMH chose to restore parkland.The conservation of parkland biodiversity reduce human pressure in the forests (ICRAF, 2004; Abbeg et al., 2005)Prioritization of multi-purpose timber is based on age, sex and nutritional habits (Belem et
al., 1996).
Adaptation to diseases related to climate variability and change
Childhood and maternal diseases : Edema, diarrhea, skin diseases, emaciation, stomach aches after childbirth, purification of the genital tract of women after childbirth
Diseases related to winds and high temperatures: Meninges, measles, eyes ache, yellow fever
Diseases related to winds and low temperatures: cold, cough, asthma, bronchitis, flu
Disease Plant species Local name Part used Disposition
Edema Parkia biglobosa Noù Leaves Bath with the decoction
Drink
Diarrhea Faidherbia albida
Saba senegalensis
Bakané Cloves ou Barks
Immatur fruits
Pound the cloves ;
Concentrated in water
for 15 mn ;
Drink the substance
Pound the cloves ;
Concentrated in water
for 15 mn ;Drink the
substance
Skin diseases Securidaga
longepedonculata
Siessa Leaves Take bath and drink the
decoction
Adaptatation to childhood and maternal diseases
What is important to note is that each phase of climate change is accompanied by a variety of illnesses and rural populations are at the forefront by their traditional skills. Most of the plants used and their physicochemical properties are confirmed (Nalcoulma, 1996). But in treating the disease, traditional medicine uses incantations, rituals, prohibitions and sacrifices.These actions aim to obtain the consent of the ancestors or appease the anger of the gods (CAPES, 2006).
P.pinnata
Variety of Barks
Nauclea latifolia Strychnos spinosa,
Etalage 1 Etalage 2
Borassus akeassii
Etalage 3
Illustrations of medicinal plants
Adansonia digitata
Contribution to Food safety
Species FamilyAvailability
Part usedLe Fr Fl Kind of food Period
Adansonia digitata Bombacaceae X X Soup, bouillie Fe :SP ; Fr :SSAnnona senegalensis Annonaceae X X Fr. Raw; soup (Fe) RSPsidium guajava Myrtaceae X Fr. Raw RSBombax costatum Bombacaceae X X Soup DSCeiba pentandra Bombacaceae X X DSCrateva religiosa Capparaceae X Soup DSDetarium microcapum Caesalpiniaceae X DSDiospyros mespiliformis Ebenaceae X Fr. Raw DSFicus sycomorus Moraceae X Fr. raw DSGardenia erubescens Rubiaceae X Fr. Raw DSGrewia bicolor Tiliaceae X X Fr. Raw DSLandolphia heudelotii Apocynaceae X X Juice, couscous RSLannea microcapa Anacardiaceae X Fr. Raw DSLeptadenia hastata Asclepiadaceae X Soup,
CouscousSP
Parinari curatelifolia Chrysobalanaceae X X SSParkia biglobosa Mimosaceae X Powder, cakes,
bouillonRS
Saba floribunda Apocynaceae X Juice, sucettes RSSaba senegalensis Apocynaceae X Juice, sucettes RSSclerocarya birrea Anacardiaceae X RSElaeis guineensis Arecaceae X Huile,soup RSStrychnos spinosa Loganiaceae X Couscous RSTamarindus indica Caesalpiniaceae X X Juice, bouillie Le : anytime(Le) ;
Fr : SS Vitellaria paradoxa Sapotaceae X Fr raw ; butter RSVitex doniana Verbenaceae X Soup DSXimenia americana Olacaceae X Sucettes AnytimeZiziphus mauritiana Rhamnaceae X Sucettes, cakes SS
Food plants
Most non-wood forest products from species listed contain iron, calcium and vitaminsB1, B2, B3 and C in significant proportions whose importance has been scientificallydemonstrated (Ouédraogo, 1994).Fruit pulp of Tamarindus indica is rich of vitamin C, Parkia biglobosa one is rich invitamin A, B1, B2, C, PP and contain 60% sugar (Zoungrana et al. 1992; Nacoulma,1996). The pulp of the fruit of Vitex doniana is very rich in vitamin A, which makes iteffective against night blindness (Tiquet, 1985).By women knowledge, food plants contribute significantly to the regime maintenanceand its balance, in periods of famine, they ensure survival
CONCLUSION
Women in the villages along the RBMH are engaged in actions foradaptation to CC. Due to their relationship with natural resources andtheir roles and responsibilities in the well-being of their families, theycontribute considerably to strengthen the adaptation actions in thesectors of forestry, health and food safety
In BF, departmental structures of scientific research and innovation,health, environment and sustainable development as well asprojects, programs, NGOs and associations are involved instrategies for minimizing adverse effects of climate change. They areworking in collaboration with the rural populations
However in traditional knowledge, there are some problems of theproduct dosages and their rational utilization. That´s why researchersare involved in this area to make indigenous knowledge more useful
First Nations & Climate Change in the Boreal Forest of Northern Ontario: A Collaborative
Approach to Research & Shared Learning
ICARUS II Conference, Ann Arbor, MI, USA, May 7, 2011
Presented by:
Dr. M.A.(Peggy) Smith Denise M. Golden (PhD Student)
Faculty of Natural Resources Management
Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada
Outline
• Part I—The Collaborative Research Process (Smith) • Foundation of Research Relationship
• First Nations’ Participation
• Rights & Responsibilities
• Part II—Research Data Collection & Findings (Golden)• Conservation vs. Utilization: Framing the Debate
• Research Setting & Geography
• Preliminary Results—Participant Observations & Community Capacity
• Community Capacity in the Climate Change Debate
• Climate Change Adaptation Capacity
• Climate Change Vulnerability
Foundation of Research Relationship—Treaties
Nishnawbe Aski Nation—Treaties #5 & #9
Source: Carol Audet, NAN
Nishnawbe Aski Nation (NAN)
4
• A territory considered by Cree, Ojibwe & Oji-Cree Nations as their homeland
• A political territorial organization (PTO)
• Established in 1973 as regional organization representing political, social & economic interests of 49 First Nations
• Covered by Treaties #5 & #9
Source: Carol Audet, NAN
Recognition of Aboriginal & Treaty rights
Agreement that research cannot be conducted without consent of First Nations (FPIC/UNDRIP)
Research methodologies (i.e., “C-R-E-E” (Lemelin)—Capacity Building, Respect, Equity & Empowerment & “PAR”) promote community involvement
Collaborative approach with communities
Platform for NAN to set precedents for protection of intellectual property rights in future research & research-related endeavours
Why First Nations Participated
Source: Carol Audet, NAN
Tri-Council Policy Statement, Ch 9, Research with Aboriginal Peoples
• National research grant agencies: National Sciences & Engineering Research Council (NSERC), Social Sciences & Humanities Research Council (SSHRC), Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
• “Respectful relationships” based on collaboration
• Acknowledges “unique status” of Aboriginal peoples in Canada
• Respect for knowledge systems & worldviews incorporated at all stages of research planning & implementation
• Respect for community customs & codes of research practice to ensure balance & mutual benefits
• Role of community in shaping research
• Respect for Aboriginal governance bodies
The Contract—Researchers’ Responsibilities
• Inform NAN about project purpose, design & methods
• Respect & consider views of NAN in project design & implementation
• Seek free, prior, informed consent
• Maintain confidentiality of responses
• Acknowledge NAN’s involvement in project
• Acknowledge prior research conducted by & for First Nation organizations
Researchers’ Responsibilities (cont’d)
• Make research results available to NAN prior to publication (60 days; NAN has 30 days to comment)—consider reasonable requests for changes
• Discuss with NAN how research findings might be applied in climate change science & in relation to NAN needs & concerns on climate change
• Ensure all research publications are forwarded to NAN
The Contract—Intellectual Property Rights
• Products jointly owned
• Products reside with NAN & LU
• IPR rights for thesis & conclusions belong to researcher. NAN may draw different conclusions, but may not attribute these to researcher
• TEK not to be used for commercial purposes
• TEK belongs to communities, not researcher
• Data may be used for future projects with informed consent of participants
Conservation vs. Utilization: Framing the Debate
CONSERVATION UTILIZATION
Image Sources: Hurst Boiler & Welding Company, Inc.; New England Wood Products
Research Setting & Geographic Overview
Jan. 6 - March 31, 2011
10 First Nations
Total distance travelled: 6,000 km/4,000 miles
Geographic area: ~111,000 sq.km/43,000 sq.m.
Transportation Costs: $9,000 CDN
Above the 50th parallel (51° 48’ N - 53° 23’ N)
Research Preliminary ResultsParticipants’ Climate Change Observations
• Strong similarities and repeated comments
• “a lot of changes”
“blue ice” conditions
Seasonal
Weather Events
Unpredictability in both
Changes in wildlife
Research Community Capacity Observations
• Wide variance in awareness & knowledge within communities & between communities
• Concept of “climate change”: the topic & about forests in mitigating climate change
With Permission Photo taken by Ralph Winter, Wunnumin, ON, May 29, 2010“A Ruddy Turnstone”
Community Capacity in the Climate Change Debate
CLIMATE CHANGE TOPICS
Within the Community
Provincial Actions
Federal Actions
International
Forest & Climate Science
AWARENESS/KNOWLEDGE
Boreal in Kingfisher Lake – Central Area
Boreal Edge in Attawapiskat – Along James Bay
Climate Change Adaptation—Capacity Factors
Infrastructure
Economic Development
Population Size
Technology Staff & Support
Leadership/Advisory
Attawapiskat Hospital Lobby Photo Sources - http://www.pbase.com/paullantz/image/128934677
The Debate & Vulnerability
Preliminary Analysis
• Community members are aware of changes in their forest, on their land
• Changes affect community activities (e.g., altering hunting routes, timing & locations of hunting activities; winter road travel)
• Capacity challenges: prepare, plan & engage in the debate (lack of dedicated staff; common or sufficient knowledge)
• Capacity challenges communities to respond to environmental change (within existing committed & extended human & financial resources)
Climate Change & Direct Impacts
Sachigo Lake, ON - May 1960 (photo taken by Lucas Tait)
Wunnumin Lake, ON - March 2011
Winter Ice Road Pikangikum, ONFebruary 2011
Fuel Delivery
Climate Change Vulnerability in the Debate
Preliminary Research Discussion
• First Nations—the local land users vulnerable to climate change—ignored in policy debate & implementation
• International norms to seek “full, prior & informed consent” of Indigenous peoples not integrated in either “utilization or conservation” approaches
• The dichotomy between conservation and utilization is not necessarily shared by First Nations
• Canada, a WEALTHY NATION, lacks information dissemination & capacity-building tools for Indigenous forest communities (i.e., community staff or other information resources, government consultation in providing on-the-ground visits, community liaisons & advisors)
Acknowledgements • Nishnawbe Aski Nation (NAN)o Carol Audet, NAN Director of Land and Resources
o Muskrat Dam First Nation
o Weagamow/North Caribou Lake First Nation
o Sandy Lake First Nation
o Pikangikum First Nation
o Nibinamik/Summer Beaver First Nation
o Neskantaga/Lansdowne House First Nation
o Attawapiskat First Nation
o Fort Albany First Nation
o Kingfisher Lake First Nation
o Wunnumin First Nation
• National Science & Engineering Research Council (NSERC)
• Social Sciences & Humanities Research Council (SSHRC)
• Dr. Steve Colombo, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources (OMNR)
• Dr. Harvey Lemelin, Lakehead University SSHRC Research Chair in Parks & Protected Areas
We would like to thank the following individuals, funders and funding agencies for their support: