Upload
daniel-james
View
220
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
The Baker Tilly Pensions Fraud Risk Survey was commissioned to gain an understanding of the incidence of fraud in pension schemes and how trustees and pensions managers have responded to the risk of fraud. According to the National Fraud Authority, fraud costs the UK in general an estimated £73 billion per annum*. In Baker Tilly’s 2011 Pensions Fraud Risk survey, 12% of respondents said their scheme had suffered fraud within the last two years. This year, the figure jumped to 19% of respondents reporting fraud over the same period. In 2012, the survey reveals that nearly one-fifth of UK pension schemes have suffered fraud in the past 24 months, an alarming rise of 55% on the same period last year, according to Baker Tilly’s Pensions Fraud Risk survey 2012.
Citation preview
HOW PREVALENT IS FRAUD IN PENSION SCHEMES?
14%
81%
5%
SURVEY 2012PENSIONS FRAUD RISK SURVEY 2012HEADLINE RESULTS
Accuracy of member data is considered the most vulnerable area of fraud
According to the National Fraud Authority, fraud costs the UK in general an estimated 73billion every year. The Baker Tilly Pensions Fraud Risk Survey 2012 reveals the incidence of fraud in UK pension schemes and shows how trustees and pension managers have responded to the risk.
Our survey shows fraud has risen sharply over the past year. In 2011s survey, 12% of respondents reported having suffered from fraud over the previous 24 months. This year, 19% have reported fraud over the same timeframe a 55% increase.
WHAT PRACTICAL STEPS CAN BE TAKEN TO MITIGATE THE RISKS OF FRAUD?
CONTACT US
Trustees have a statutory responsibility to demonstrate how they have complied with their duties of preventing and detecting fraud.
16%of trustee respondents failed to recognise they are responsible for the detection and prevention of fraud.
Only
7.5%of schemes have introduced a formal fraud response policy.
35%of schemes have not tested internal controls for more than a year.
19%
12%
+55%
2011
2012
0
5
10
15
20
2521%
15%
+40%
0
5
10
15
20
25
2011
201219% of survey respondents report having suffered from fraud during the last 24 months a 55% rise on last year.
21% of respondents say they have not actively considered fraud risks over the past 12 months up from 15% last year.
Almost
1/5of schemes reported some fraudulent activity within the last two years
To your knowledge, has your scheme suffered from any form of fraud?
Just over
20%of trustee boards have given no consideration to the threat over the past 12 months
No Yes, in the last 12 months Yes, in the last 24 months
To your knowledge, has your scheme suffered from any form of fraud (based on scheme size)?
No Yes, in the last 12 months Yes, in the last 24 months
96%
4%
0-1,000 members
88%
5%7%
1,000-10,000 members
30%
62%
8%
10,000 members
INTRODUCTION
Include fraud risk and related internal controls in your risk register and regularly test the internal controls - extend the statement in your Annual Report covering key risks and internal controls to also consider fraud risk
1
Define your fraud risk policy and allocate responsibility clearly to ensure that everyone (including third party service providers) knows their obligations and how to take action
2
Consider fraud risk more regularly than at present ideally at least twice a year in the current economic climate 3
Educate employees so that they too know how to recognise fraud, how to report it and why it is unacceptable5
Collate information on fraud cases and ensure the warning signs are widely recognised e.g. lack of segregation of duties, constant breakdowns in internal controls, individuals who work long hours, may have financial problems, or their lifestyle does not appear to be commensurate with salary
4
Phone: 020 3201 8000Email: www.bakertilly.co.uk
Marcus McCafferyPartner, Forensic [email protected]
Ian BellHead of [email protected]