Upload
duane-ray
View
217
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
PEARLS FROM PREGNANCY
April 2002
Karen M. Chacko, MD
The Obstetric Interview• Did you have diabetes during pregnancy?• Did you have preeclampsia or complications
during pregnancy?• Did you have blood pressure problems during
pregnancy?• Did you have a clot during pregnancy or with
OCP use?• Did you have thyroid problems after pregnancy?• Was your baby small at birth?
Gestational Diabetes Mellitus
• Formerly, every woman had 50 g OGTT done at 24-28 weeks
• New (January 1999) ADA criteria exempt women <25 years old, BMI <27, no FHx, not Hispanic /Native American /Asian /African American /Pacific Islander
• GDM complicates ~4% of pregnancies
Follow-up of GDM
• Greenberg (1995) : 94 women with GDM given 75 g OGTT at 6 weeks post-partum, 34% with abnl. test:
18% classified as IGT16% classified as Diabetic
• IGT patients become diabetic at a rate of 1-5% per year
Follow-up of GDM
Greenberg, cont’d• Three predictive variables
insulin requirementspoor glycemic control (2 hr pp >150)50g OGTT value (>200)
• If insulin requirements were >100 units/day, 100% of these women had an abnl. 6 week postpartum OGTT
Follow-up of GDM
• Damm (1995) 91 women with diet-treated GDM given 75 gm OGTT at 8 weeks post-partum, 29.7% with abnormal test
16.5% classified as diabetic
13.2% with IGT
Follow-up of GDM
• Kjos (1995): 675 Latino women with diet-controlled GDM screened pp with 75 gm OGTT and then followed at 5 years, overall 47% incidence of diabetes at 5 years
Initial OGTT % diabetic at 5 years
IGT 80%
normal 12%
Glycemic Control and Malformations
• Lucas (1989)correlated A1C at <16 weeks gestation to rate of malformations
HgbA1C none major minor
>10 64.7% 11.8% 23.5%
8.0-9.9 87.1% 4.8% 8.1%
<7.9 95.2% 1.6% 3.2%
Recommendations for the PCP
• ADA position: if glucose levels are normal postpartum after GDM, reassessment should be done at a minimum every 3 years. Women with IGT/IFG should have more frequent screening
• Fasting glucose is acceptable as screening method (do not have to employ an OGTT)
The Obstetric Interview• Did you have diabetes during pregnancy?• Did you have preeclampsia or complications
during pregnancy?• Did you have blood pressure problems during
pregnancy?• Did you have a clot during pregnancy or with
OCP use?• Did you have thyroid problems after pregnancy?• Was your baby small at birth?
Preeclampsia and Pregnancy
• Preeclampsia risk factors include:
Hypertension Extremes of Age
Primigravid state Family History
Obesity Renal Disease
Diabetes mellitus Smoking (?)
Hypercoagulable stateInterbirth Interval
Preeclampsia and Hypercoagulable States
• Several studies have looked at the incidence of Factor V Leiden among women with preeclampsia (Kupferminc, Dekkar, Lindoff, Dizon-Townson)
• Studies done that include a “full” hypercoagulable workup (Kupferminc, Dekkar)
Preeclampsia and Factor V Leiden
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Kupferminc Dekkar
Factor V
Controls
Lindoff Dizon-Townson
% o
f P
atie
nts
Preeclampsia and Hypercoagulable States
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
percent withabnormalitywith appropriatecutoff value
Dekkar
Complicated Pregnancies and Hypercoagulable States
0
5
10
15
20
25Fa
ctor
V
PT g
ene
Hom
ocys
tein
eC
/S/A
TII
I/A
CLA
casescontrols
Kupferminc 1999
Factor V and fetal loss
05
101520253035404550
Brenner Rai Grandone Belasch
cases
controls
% o
f pa
tien
ts
Fetal Loss and Hypercoagulable States
02
46
810
1214
161820
Factor V Prothrombin MTHFR
casescontrols
% of
patients
Martinelli 2000
Hypercoagulability and Recurrent Fetal Loss
• Foka 2000 • 80 Greek women with
2 or more losses and 100 controls
• Greek population prevalence of Factor V= 4.3% and PT=2.8%
02468
101214161820
FactorV
PT MTHFR
cases
controls
Hypercoagulability and Recurrent Fetal Loss
Foka cont’d
1st trimester 2nd trimester
Factor V 14.7%31.5%
PT 8.1%10.5%
Thrombophilic Women and pregnancy
• Preston (1996): 571 women with known thrombophilias followed during a collective 1524 pregnancies compared with 395 controls having 1019 pregnancies
Stillbirth OR 3.6 (1.4-9.4)
Miscarriage OR 1.27 (0.94-1.71)
Combined defects overall OR 14.3 (2.4-86)
Recommendations for the PCP
• Perform a directed hypercoagulable workup in women with a history of severe/early-onset/recurrent preeclampsia, stillbirths, fetal loss, abruption, IUGR
• With regards to miscarriage/stillbirth, primary considerations should be lupus anticoagulant, PT, and Factor V
The Obstetric Interview• Did you have diabetes during pregnancy?• Did you have preeclampsia or complications
during pregnancy?• Did you have blood pressure problems during
pregnancy?• Did you have a clot during pregnancy or with
OCP use?• Did you have thyroid problems after pregnancy?• Was your baby small at birth?
Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy
• Four basic subdivisions of hypertensive disorders during pregnancy:
Chronic hypertension
Chronic with superimposed preeclampsia
Preeclampsia or eclampsia
Transient (gestational) hypertension/ PIH
(Mis)classification schemes
• Fisher (1981): 176 pregnancies complicated by a hypertensive disorder (almost all were labeled as preeclamptic by chart review), all with renal biopsy done postpartum54% with biopsy compatible with preeclampsia alone25% primips incorrectly diagnosed65% multips incorrectly diagnosed
(Mis)classification schemes
• Reiter (1994): 186 women with HTN in pregnancy; BP, U/A, lytes, renal imaging, microscopy
8% of preeclamptics found to have underlying renal disorder (essential HTN, sponge kidney, reflux nephropathy)
16% of gestational HTN with underlying disorder (essential HTN,sponge kidney, thin basement membrane disease)
Normalization of Blood Pressure
• Ferrazzani (1994)
159 women with gestational HTN
mean of 6 days pp to normalization
(DBP <80 for 3 consecutive days)
110 women with preeclampsia
mean of 16 days pp to normalization
If >50 days pp with elevated BP, reclassify as chronic HTN
Progression to Chronic Hypertension
• Adams (1961) avg 20 years of follow-up
systolic >140 diastolic >90
severe preecl. 43% 40%
mild/PIH 58% 60%
normotensive 26% 21%
nulliparous 41% 35%
Progression to Chronic Hypertension
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Adams
Sibai
Nisel
l
Lindeb
erg
Preeclamptic
PIH
Controls% o
f pa
tien
ts
Predicting Ischemic Heart Disease
• Hannaford (1997) 214,356 woman-years of follow-up
RR for preeclamptics vs. normotensives
HTN 2.35 (CI 2.08-2.65)
Acute mi 2.24 (CI 1.42-3.53)
Chronic isch. 1.74 (CI 1.06-2.86)
Heart Dz.
Angina 1.53 (CI 1.09-2.15)
Prediciting Ischemic Heart Disease
• Mann (1996): 77 women under the age of 45 with acute mi and history of preeclampsia, 207 controls
preecl. plus RR p-valuenone 3.0 <0.01cigarettes 3.8 <0.01HTN 2.8 <0.02OCPs 2.8 <0.02all 2.8 <0.05
Recommendations for the PCP
• Women with a hypertensive disorder first recognized during pregnancy should normalize BP by 2 months maximum
• Risk of progression to chronic HTN much higher in women with gestational HTN/ PIH
• Normotensive pregnancies predict decreased future risk of hypertension
• Hypertensive disorders may predict future risk of ischemic heart disease
The Obstetric Interview• Did you have diabetes during pregnancy?• Did you have preeclampsia or complications
during pregnancy?• Did you have blood pressure problems during
pregnancy?• Did you have a clot during pregnancy or with
OCP use?• Did you have thyroid problems after pregnancy?• Was your baby small at birth?
DVT or PE during pregnancy or on OCPs
• PE is one of the leading causes of maternal mortality
• Pregnancy by itself will increase the levels of coagulation factors I, VII, VIII, X and will decrease the level of total Prot. S
• 40% of postpartum DVTs present after discharge from the hospital
Factor V and VTE
• Faioni (1996): a series of 493 patients with arterial or venous clot, 15% found to possess Factor V Leiden (controls 2%)
• Among the female patients with Factor V, the inciting event was felt to be pregnancy, postpartum state, or OCP use in 67%
Factor V and VTE
• Hellgren (1995): women with DVT or PE during pregnancy (n=34), OCP use (n=28), and controls (n=75)20/34 (59%) of pregnant women with h/o thrombosis with Factor V Leiden9/28 (32%) of women on OCPs with thrombosis with Factor V Leiden10% of controls with Factor V Leiden
Pregnancy-related VTE
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Fact
or V PT
MT
HFR
casescontrols
• Grandone (1998)• 42 patients with
DVT in pregnancy vs. 213 controls
• coexistence of>1 mutation in 21.4%
% of patients
Pregnancy-related VTE
05
1015202530354045
Fact
or V PT
V
/PT
AT
III/
C/S
cases
controls
• Gerhardt 2000• 119 women with VTE
during pregnancy or puerperium, 223 controls
OCPs and DVT
• Martinelli (1998): 80 patients with DVT (61% on OCPs) vs. 120 controls (32% on OCPs)
DVT no DVT
Factor V 19% 3%
Prothrombin 18% 3%
Prot C/S/ATIII/APLA 16% 3%
Factor V and VTE• Vandenbroucke (1994): 155 women with DVT
and 169 controls without DVT35/155 (23%) of women with DVT have Factor V Leiden mutation vs. 6/169 (3.5%) of controls109/155 (70%) women on OCPs or with usage within the 6 months prior to DVTRR thrombosis from OCPs 3.8 (2.4-6.0)RR thrombosis with Factor V 7.9 (3.2-19.4)RR for OCPs plus Factor V 34.7 (7.8-154)
DVT and Factor V
0102030405060
Hel
lgre
nV
ande
nbro
ucke
Gra
ndon
eM
artin
elli
Ger
hard
t
pregnancy
OCPs
controls
Screening and OCPs?
• Vandenbroucke (1996): to prevent one death from PE, 20,000 women with Factor V mutation would have to be denied OCPs for one year and 400,000 women would have to be screened to find them
• Middledorp (1998): in order to prevent 3 VTEs, you would have to withhold 1000 carriers from OCPs
Prophylaxis and Pregnancy?
• Middledorp (1998): if we were to use prophlyactic heparin for Factor V carriers in pregnancy, 980 of 1000 women would be treated unnecessarily in attempts to prevent a VTE
Recommendations for the PCP• Women with a DVT or PE during either
pregnancy or while on OCPs deserve a hypercoagulable work-up
• Prophylaxis during pregnancy is not feasible
• Mass screening prior to prescribing OCPs has not proven feasible
• Women with a known disorder should never receive combined OCPs
The Obstetric Interview• Did you have diabetes during pregnancy?• Did you have preeclampsia or complications
during pregnancy?• Did you have blood pressure problems during
pregnancy?• Did you have a clot during pregnancy or with
OCP use?• Did you have thyroid problems after
pregnancy?• Was your baby small at birth?
Postpartum Thyroiditis
• Complicates 4-7% of pregnancies
• Incidence among Type 1 diabetics 22.5%
• Biopsy shows lymphocytic infiltration
• Closely associated with presence of anti-microsomal (anti-peroxidase) antibodies
Postpartum thyroiditis - three phases
• Thyrotoxic phase (1-3 months): mild symptoms or asymptomatic, decreased RAIU
• Hypothyroid phase (4-8 months): clinically hypothyroid or psychiatric symptoms
• Euthyroid phase (within one year): significant proportion go on to develop permanent hypothyroidism
Who is at risk for PPT?
• Mestman (1999), Gerstein (1993)
previous pregnancy with PPT
presence of antimicrosomal Ab
FHx of thyroid disease
TSH >2 at 12 weeks gestation
prior autoimmune disease, especially Type 1 DM
HLA haplotypes assoc. with Hashimoto’s
Postpartum Thyroiditis
•Anitmicrosomal antibodies are the most closely correlated with the development of PPT
•10% of pregnant women overall will have positive titers and of those with positive titers, 50% may develop PPT
•Positive titer yields OR of developing PPT 86.6 (45.9-163.2)
Thyroiditis and Depression
• Harris (1992):
145 women , thyroid anitbody positive - 43% with postpartum mental illness
229 women, thyroid antibody negative - 28% with postpartum mental illness
p<0.005
Thyroiditis and Depression
• Pop (1993):
9/27 microsomal antibody positive women with depression (33%)
52/266 microsomal antibody negative women with depression (19.5%)
RR for depression in antibody positive 1.73
(CI 0.92-3.28)
Incidence of Ongoing Hypothyroidism
05
10152025
3035
Tach
iO
thm
anJa
nns
on
Am
ino
Ras
mus
sen
Nik
olai
Sol
omon
% o
f pa
tien
ts
Treatment- PPT•Hyperthyroid phase - nothing or beta-blockers
•Hypothyroid phase - often requires treatment with L-thyroxine, wean after 6 months therapy and recheck TSH
Recommendations for the PCP
• TSH at one year postpartum in women with PPT or history of pp depression
• Yearly screening with TSH in women with prior history of PPT as approximately 5% per year will become hypothyroid
• Screening prior to next pregnancy in women with a history of PPT or Type I DM
The Obstetric Interview• Did you have diabetes during pregnancy?• Did you have preeclampsia or complications
during pregnancy?• Did you have blood pressure problems during
pregnancy?• Did you have a clot during pregnancy or with
OCP use?• Did you have thyroid problems after pregnancy?• Was your baby small at birth?
Selected Etiologies of Low Birth Weight
• HTN
• Smoking
• Alcohol
• Cocaine/crack abuse
• Physical/mental abuse
Mechanisms of Low Birth Weight
• Direct: abruptio placentae, fetal fractures, uterine rupture, liver/spleen rupture, pelvic fractures, antepartum hemorrhage, premature contractions, PROM, infection, exacerbation of chronic conditions
• Indirect: decreased access to prenatal care, increased stress, behavioral risks (smoking, alcohol, drugs), inadequate nutrition
HTN and Birth Weight
• Surian (1984): normotensive IUGR 2.3% and hypertensive IUGR 15.6%
• Bellomo (1999): neonatal weight in normotensive pregnancies 3336 gm vs. an average weight of 2911 gm in hypertensives (p<0.001)
Smoking and Birth Weight
• Overall, 26% of reproductive age women are smokers and 31% of women between the ages of 8-34 years smoke at least 1 ppd (Fried, 1993)
• Smoking accounts for 20-30% of low birth weight babies and 10% of infant mortality
• Babies are 150-250 gm (Fried, 1993) to 458 gm (Bernstein, 1997) lighter on average vs. nonsmokers
Alcohol and Low Birth Weight
• Little (1980): women who were abstinent but formerly alcoholic had birthweights 258 gm less on average, current alcoholics were average 493 gm lighter
• Passaro (1996): 10,539 women drinking 1-2 drinks/day with at least one binge or 3 drinks/day had a mean birthweight 150 gm less
Cocaine and fetal outcome
• Associated with preterm labor, spontaneous abortion, IUGR, limb reduction defects
• Among women aged 18-25, estimated 4.8% have used in the last year and 1.6% within the last month
• Among women 26-34, 4.5% have used within the past year and 1.1% within the last month (Richardson, 1993)
Cocaine and Fetal Outcomes
01020304050
3-D Column 2
SprauveCalhoun
BatemanCherukuri
% o
f pa
tien
ts
Preterm
IUGR
LBW
Controls
Frequency of Abuse
• Eisenstat (1999)
1/4 women are abused at some point during their lives
1/7 women have been abused within the past year
1/6 women are abused during pregnancy
Picking up on Abuse
• Suspect if failure or delay in obtaining prenatal care
• Linked to complications in pregnancy:
miscarriage
abruption
PROM
antepartum hemorrhage
low birth weight
Estimates of Abuse During Pregnancy
0
5
10
15
20
25
Bullock McFarlane Helton Hillard Campbell
% o
f pa
tien
ts
Meta-Analysis of Abuse During Pregnancy
• Gazmararian (1996): meta-analysis of 13 studies of prevalence of abuse during pregnancy (11/13 involved physical abuse only)
• Estimated abuse in 3.9-8.3%
• Studies asking >1 time per patient or in the third trimester range 7.4-20.1%
(Under)estimates of Abuse During Pregnancy
• McFarlane (1991)
8% of women reported abuse on a standard intake form
29% reported abuse when asked directly by a physician
Abuse and Low Birth Weight
• Bullock (1989): compared public and private hospital settings along with abused and non-abused women
battered controls p-value
low b.w. 12.5% 6.6% <0.02
private/lbw 17.5% 4.2% <0.001
public/lbw 10.0% 9.6% NS
Recommendations for the PCP
• Recognize hidden underlying factors that can predispose to low birth weight
• Ask directed questions about abuse in addition to already asked questions about smoking/alcohol/drugs
• Ask more than once
Summary of Recommendations for the PCP
• Women with GDM should have screening for diabetes and should be followed with yearly screening thereafter - optimization of glucose control prior to conception is crucial
• Women with a hypertensive disorder are at increased risk for chronic hypertension, recurrent preeclampsia, and increased future risk of ischemic heart disease
Summary of Recommendations for the PCP
• Women with severe/early-onset preeclampsia, IUGR, stillbirth or recurrent miscarriages should have a hypercoagulable workup
• Women with a DVT or PE during pregnancy or while on OCPs need a hypercoagulable workup; mass screening prior to prescribing or conceiving not indicated
Summary of Recommendations for the PCP
• Women with a history of postpartum thyroiditis are at high risk of becoming permanently hypothyroid and need yearly TSH screening
• Women with low birth weight babies could have a number of different contributing factors, including (but not limited to) tobacco, alcohol, cocaine, and abuse
Case Presentation
• 16 y.o. G1P0 presented at 35 weeks gestation with RUQ pain, BP 186/110, elevated transaminases, platelet count of 114K, and urine dip 3+ for protein
• She was hospitalized for preeclampsia and had a normal delivery
• Prior to discharge, she is started on a combined OCP
Case cont’d
• 2 months later, she returns with a DVT and hepatic vein thrombosis
• Workup included Prot C/S levels, Factor V Leiden - all unrevealing
• Past records from her pregnancy include a prolonged PTT of 40.2 seconds (control 23.4-33.8 seconds)
Case cont’d
• 1:1 dilutiion and RVVT both prolonged• PTT corrected with phospholipid
neutralization test• Diagnosis: antiphospholipid antibody
syndrome secondary to lupus anticoagulant • What would you have done if she had come
to see you post-partum prior to the use of combined OCPs
Cost savings analysis
• Gregory (1993): assumed incidence of DM among GDM pregnancies at 5 years 30-50% and a rate of conversion to DM per year of 6.7%
• Using dietary/exercise strategies, even if only 10% of cases were delayed for 10 years, $71 million 1990 dollars would be saved by the tenth year
(Mis)classification schemes
• Ihle (1987): 84 pts. with ‘early-onset’ preeclampsia; 24 hr urine, U/A, lytes, biopsy (if rbc’s), IVP
67% of primips had underlying renal abnormalities
63% of multips had underlying renal abnormalities
Predicting Ischemic Heart Disease
• Jonsdottir (1995) follow-up of 7543 hypertensive pregnancies for ischemic heart disease
Hypertensives vs. normals RR 1.47 (1.05-2.02)
Eclamptics vs. normals RR 2.61 (1.11-6.12)
Preeclamptics vs. normals RR 1.90 (1.02-3.52)
Recurrent DVT
• DeStefano (1999) - general population – RR first DVT (heterozygous Factor V) 7– RR first DVT (homozygous Factor V) 80– RR first DVT (heterozygous PT) 2.7-3.8
– RR recurrent DVT (hetero. Factor V) 1.1– RR recurrent DVT (hetero. V/PT) 2.6
Drugs and Abortion
• Ness (1999): 400 women with spontaneous abortion vs. 570 women with intact pregnancy at 22 weeks. Hair and urine analysis for cocaine and tobacco.
spont. abortion intact preg OR
cocaine pos. 28.9% 20.5% 1.4 (1.0-2.1)
tobacco pos. 34.6% 21.8% 1.8 (1.3-2.6)