1
Patient Support Programme (PSP) NHS Survey See Mun Wong, Outsourced Medicines Supply Services Lead (North West of England) North West Pharmaceutical Quality Assurance & Procurement, Liverpool ([email protected]) Introduction: A plethora of patient support programmes (PSPs) is offered by various pharmaceutical companies to the NHS. This study aimed to gather NHS staff experience and feedback on PSPs to inform national strategy on this service aspect. Methodology: Consulted with NHMC, ABPI and NCHA Questionnaire circulated to all NHS Trust (UK-wide) as an online Google Form in November 2018 Usefulness and impact scored by Likert Scale 4 week completion window; data analysed via Google Forms 2% 12% 5% 21% 5% 11% 12% 2% 30% Distribution of Specialty Cancer Dermatology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Neurology Pharmacy Pharmacy Homecare Respiratory Rheumatology PSPs most rated as very useful: Nurse-led injection training Reminder via text message/smartphone app Assistance administering medicine at home Product / disease information PSPs that received mixed ratings: Face-to-face motivational interview Patient education by external nurse Phlebotomy service Telephone consultation on device administration/drug education Likert Scale: 0 – no impact, 1 – low impact, 2 – some impact, 3 – moderate impact, 4 – high impact Discussion: Results demonstrate that there is no ‘one size fits all’ PSP Those that promote self-management and ‘care closer to home’, i.e. injection training and text reminders, have been identified as most useful in the NHS Injection training could be included as a core element of a mid-tech homecare service, as defined in the RPS Homecare Handbook Other PSPs which were not in the original questionnaire include disease activity and Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) monitoring PSPs that support hospital specialists (e.g. phlebotomy, telephone consultation, patient education, PROMs monitoring) suggest that the NHS in this area could be overstretched. Results: “I appreciate that all of the PSPs are very useful and a valuable extra for the very busy clinical teams. On the outside it is an excellent service. My worry is when these support services are removed or withdrawn for whatever reason how the teams then manage this level of service? Often this level would not be sustainable back within clinic settings. “We have received very positive feedback from those patients who are enrolled on a PSP at our Trust. However different drug companies use different Homecare companies, this is problematic for the clinical teams when referring using different paperwork and having to remember slightly different protocols.” “From experience, it causes problems if need to switch to a better value product if patients are 'locked' into a PSP.” “If NHS funds PSP, service may be tailored more to meet the specific needs of the clinic/patients. Service could be made available to all patients regardless of which drug they are prescribed - avoids inequity of care and the possibility that a PSP needs to be withdrawn from a patient because they change drug. Also avoids the risk that prescribing decisions are influenced by whether or not a PSP is available for each drug.” “PSP should have maximum impact for minimum effort whilst ensuring patient safety. Too many face to face programmes or phone calls won’t appeal to patients who lead busy lives.” Conclusion: The survey has gathered useful feedback from NHS staff on PSPs. More robust evidence is required to demonstrate cost-effective benefit to patients and the NHS. The next step should focus on reviewing the effect of PSPs on patient outcomes. Acknowledgement: Special thanks to the Chair and members of the NHMC for their support on this work. 0 20 40 60 80 Home infusion service Data collection of PROMS and disease… Face-to-face motivational interview N/A Blood sampling at patient's home Patient education by external nurse Diary e.g. for adherence or symptom… Telephone consultation on drug/device Pharma-run online educational programme Reminder via text message or… Adherence phone call Assistance administering medicine at home Product/Disease Information (e.g.… Initial nurse-led injection training Type of PSP that participants have accessed before Overall impact of PSPs in patient outcome Overall impact of PSPs in clinical service Comments were revealing. Would you recommend PSPs more to your patients if they were funded by the NHS? A total of 104 responses received.

Patient Support Programme (PSP) NHS Survey€¦ · homecare service, as defined in the RPS Homecare Handbook • Other PSPs which were not in the original questionnaire include disease

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Patient Support Programme (PSP) NHS Survey€¦ · homecare service, as defined in the RPS Homecare Handbook • Other PSPs which were not in the original questionnaire include disease

Patient Support Programme (PSP) NHS Survey See Mun Wong, Outsourced Medicines Supply Services Lead (North West of England)

North West Pharmaceutical Quality Assurance & Procurement, Liverpool ([email protected])

Introduction:

A plethora of patient support programmes (PSPs) is offered by various pharmaceutical companies to the NHS. This study aimed to gather NHS staff experience and feedback on PSPs to inform national strategy on this service aspect.

Methodology:

• Consulted with NHMC, ABPI and NCHA

• Questionnaire circulated to all NHS Trust (UK-wide) as an online Google Form in November 2018

• Usefulness and impact scored by Likert Scale

• 4 week completion window; data analysed via Google Forms

2%

12%

5%

21%

5% 11%

12%

2%

30%

Distribution of Specialty Cancer

Dermatology

Endocrinology

Gastroenterology

Neurology

Pharmacy

PharmacyHomecare

Respiratory

Rheumatology

PSPs most rated as very useful: • Nurse-led injection training • Reminder via text

message/smartphone app • Assistance administering

medicine at home • Product / disease information

PSPs that received mixed ratings: • Face-to-face motivational

interview • Patient education by external

nurse • Phlebotomy service • Telephone consultation on device

administration/drug education

Likert Scale: 0 – no impact, 1 – low impact, 2 – some impact, 3 – moderate impact, 4 – high impact

Discussion: • Results demonstrate that there is no ‘one size fits all’ PSP

• Those that promote self-management and ‘care closer to home’, i.e. injection training and text reminders, have been identified as most useful in the NHS

• Injection training could be included as a core element of a mid-tech homecare service, as defined in the RPS Homecare Handbook

• Other PSPs which were not in the original questionnaire include disease activity and Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) monitoring

• PSPs that support hospital specialists (e.g. phlebotomy, telephone consultation, patient education, PROMs monitoring) suggest that the NHS in this area could be overstretched.

Results:

“I appreciate that all of the PSPs are very useful and a valuable extra for the very busy clinical teams. On the outside it is an excellent service.

My worry is when these support services are removed or withdrawn for whatever reason how the teams then manage this level of service?

Often this level would not be sustainable back within clinic

settings.

“We have received very positive feedback from those patients who are enrolled on a PSP at our Trust. However different drug companies use different Homecare companies, this is problematic for the clinical teams when referring using different paperwork and having to remember slightly different protocols.”

“From experience, it causes problems if need to switch to a better value

product if patients are 'locked' into a PSP.”

“If NHS funds PSP, service may be tailored more to meet the specific

needs of the clinic/patients. Service could be made available to all

patients regardless of which drug they are prescribed - avoids

inequity of care and the possibility that a PSP needs to be withdrawn

from a patient because they change drug. Also avoids the risk that

prescribing decisions are influenced by whether or not a PSP is available

for each drug.”

“PSP should have maximum impact for minimum effort whilst ensuring patient safety. Too many face to face programmes or phone calls won’t appeal to

patients who lead busy lives.”

Conclusion: The survey has gathered useful feedback from NHS staff on PSPs. More robust evidence is required to demonstrate cost-effective benefit to patients and the NHS. The next step should focus on reviewing the effect of PSPs on patient outcomes.

Acknowledgement: Special thanks to the Chair and members of the NHMC for their support on this work.

0 20 40 60 80

Home infusion service

Data collection of PROMS and disease…

Face-to-face motivational interview

N/A

Blood sampling at patient's home

Patient education by external nurse

Diary e.g. for adherence or symptom…

Telephone consultation on drug/device

Pharma-run online educational programme

Reminder via text message or…

Adherence phone call

Assistance administering medicine at home

Product/Disease Information (e.g.…

Initial nurse-led injection training

Type of PSP that participants have accessed before

Overall impact of PSPs in patient outcome

Overall impact of PSPs in clinical service

Comments were revealing.

Would you recommend PSPs more to your patients if they were funded by the NHS?

A total of 104 responses received.