20
2 October 2003 Paul Dauncey 1 Paris Summary Part 2 and Status of UK Electronics/DAQ Paul Dauncey Imperial College London, UK

Paris Summary Part 2 and Status of UK Electronics/DAQ

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Paris Summary Part 2 and Status of UK Electronics/DAQ. Paul Dauncey Imperial College London, UK. Paris Meeting Part 2. Rest of talks at Paris: Very Front End (VFE) electronics Christophe de la Taille, Julien Fleury UK electronics/DAQ Adam Baird, Paul Dauncey Simulation studies - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Paris Summary Part 2 and   Status of UK Electronics/DAQ

2 October 2003 Paul Dauncey 1

Paris Summary Part 2 and Status of UK Electronics/DAQ

Paul Dauncey

Imperial College London, UK

Page 2: Paris Summary Part 2 and   Status of UK Electronics/DAQ

2 October 2003 Paul Dauncey 2

Rest of talks at Paris:• Very Front End (VFE) electronics

• Christophe de la Taille, Julien Fleury

• UK electronics/DAQ• Adam Baird, Paul Dauncey

• Simulation studies• Nigel Watson

• Organisation• Jean Claude Brient, Sandrine Le Quellec

Will summarise these in (apparently) random order• Except simulation work was all from UK so is covered in some

detail later today

Paris Meeting Part 2

Page 3: Paris Summary Part 2 and   Status of UK Electronics/DAQ

2 October 2003 Paul Dauncey 3

• Medium term aim for ECAL is beam test at DESY• This is currently assumed to be around Aug 2004• Requires mechanical construction of ECAL to start in Mar 2004• Competition! SLAC/Oregon are now proposing full Si-W ECAL

prototype also; their timescale is end 2005

• Longer term aim for ECAL+HCAL(s) is beam test at FNAL• Less certain timescale; could be end of 2004 but could easily slip into

2005• Will need to write proposal for beam time (discussion at end of day)• Will also help “lock-in” US DHCAL collaborators

• Documentation• Want central repository of “all” documentation (not clear exactly what)• Have set up an EDMS (CERN) database at Ecole Polytechnique• Web accessible interface but not email list handler• Somewhat overly complicated for our needs?

Organisation

Page 4: Paris Summary Part 2 and   Status of UK Electronics/DAQ

2 October 2003 Paul Dauncey 4

• Very Front End (VFE) electronics is what the UK connects to• VFE PCB physically holds the silicon wafers and VFE readout electronics• Main component of VFE readout electronics is the VFE ASIC, FLCPHY2• Three flavours of VFE board, with either 216 or 108 channels, 12 or 6 chips

VFE overview

Page 5: Paris Summary Part 2 and   Status of UK Electronics/DAQ

2 October 2003 Paul Dauncey 5

• FLCPHY2 is second iteration of design

• Small fabrication run completed in Jul 2003

• Testing now ~complete

VFE chip status (de la Taille)

Ibm

_p

a

Rst

_R

Ibo_sh10 SW Ibi_wid Ib_cc Ibo_wid

Vddd OUT_g10

Vdd_ota+diode

SW_C2 SW_C3

Vss_ota

SW_C0 SW3

Ib_ota SW2

SW_C1

Vd

da

In 0

Ibi_

pa

Vb

_p

a +

Vb

f V

ss_

pa

If_

pa

Ibo

_p

a

Ibo

_sh

1 Ib

i_sh

1

H

D_

R

Vss

_se

tH

Ibi_

sh1

0

In 1

6

Ck_

R

In 1

In 2 In 3 In 4 In 5 In 6 In 7 In 8 Vss In 9 In 10 In 11 In 12

In 15 In 14 In 13

SW

0

In 1

7 V

dd

_p

a

SW

1 V

ss_p

a V

ss_sh

1 V

ref_

sh1

Q_

R

Vd

d_

sh1

OU

T_

g1

Vss_

sh1

0 V

ref1

_sh

10

Vd

d_

sh1

0 V

ref2

_sh

10

Vdd

_se

tH

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

10

9

11

12

13

14

15

16 17 18 19 20 21 24 22 23 31 30 29 28 27 26 25

40

39

38

32

37 36

35

34

33

47

46

45

44

43

42

41

51 50 49

48

56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 55 54 53 52

FLC_PHY2 TQFP 64 package

Gain pour différentes combinaisons de Cf

-100m

0.00

100m

200m

0.0 300n 600n 900n 1.2u 1.5u

Cf=0.8pF

:

Cf=1pF Cf=1.2pF

:

Cf=1.4pF

:

Cf=1.6pF Cf=1.8pF

Cf=2pF Cf=2.2pF Cf=2.4pF Cf=2.6pF Cf=2.8pF:

Cf=3pF

temps (s)

Vou

t(v

)

Gain pour différentes combinaisons de Cf

-100m

0.00

100m

200m

0.0 300n 600n 900n 1.2u 1.5u

Cf=0.8pF

:

Cf=1pF Cf=1.2pF

:

Cf=1.4pF

:

Cf=1.6pF Cf=1.8pF

Cf=2pF Cf=2.2pF Cf=2.4pF Cf=2.6pF Cf=2.8pF:

Cf=3pF

temps (s)

Vou

t(v

)

Page 6: Paris Summary Part 2 and   Status of UK Electronics/DAQ

2 October 2003 Paul Dauncey 6

• Chip performs to requirements• Pedestals; rms 5mV (in 1.4V)• Peaking time; rms 1ns (on 180ns)• Crosstalk; <1%

• Will go to full production ~now• Need ~600 chips• Back end Dec, test in Jan

VFE chip performance

Page 7: Paris Summary Part 2 and   Status of UK Electronics/DAQ

2 October 2003 Paul Dauncey 7

• Prototype PCB was half-size• Scaling up to full number of channels• Several changes to UK interface; still in flux

VFE board status (Fleury)

• Trying to freeze final design ~now• Big jump from prototype, so doing production in two steps• Will produce two pre-production PCBs by end Oct 2003• Ideally test these and then make the other ~60 needed during Dec 2003• But must test with UK prototype before this; delay by ~one month• VFE PCB is part of ECAL mechanical structure; UK delaying assembly!

Page 8: Paris Summary Part 2 and   Status of UK Electronics/DAQ

2 October 2003 Paul Dauncey 8

• Need to produce six readout boards for whole ECAL

• 1728 channels maximum per board, 9720 channels total

• All other items needed for readout commercially available

• Crate, PC, VME interface, cables

• Board architecture• Eight Front Ends (FE), each

controlling one or two VFE PCBs• Single Back End (BE) does data

fan in/out to FEs• Based on CMS FED board

Overview of UK electronics

Page 9: Paris Summary Part 2 and   Status of UK Electronics/DAQ

2 October 2003 Paul Dauncey 9

CMS FED board (Rob Halsall, RAL)

Page 10: Paris Summary Part 2 and   Status of UK Electronics/DAQ

2 October 2003 Paul Dauncey 10

• Design and layout “close” to completion

• Six months later than scheduled

• Unfortunately, these became too closely coupled

• Aiming to send for fabrication within two weeks

CALICE board layout (Adam Baird, RAL)

Page 11: Paris Summary Part 2 and   Status of UK Electronics/DAQ

2 October 2003 Paul Dauncey 11

• Main change from CMS is FE area• Higher component count in CALICE so denser layout

CALICE board FE layout

Page 12: Paris Summary Part 2 and   Status of UK Electronics/DAQ

2 October 2003 Paul Dauncey 12

• Also need to write firmware (code to load into FPGAs)• VME interface identical to CMS; (we hope) no work needed• BE close but not identical so some work needed (Dave Mercer, Manc).

Will also contain VME trigger interface, not existing in CMS (Matt Warren, UCL)

• FE completely different; effectively a new design (Osman Zorba, IC)

• Progress being made in these areas using simulation• But real prototype CALICE board will speed things up

Readout board firmware

• E.g. FE trigger delay simulation

• Allows adjustment in 3ns steps so trigger arrives at time of VFE chip peak

Page 13: Paris Summary Part 2 and   Status of UK Electronics/DAQ

2 October 2003 Paul Dauncey 13

• Multi-PC system driven by common run control PC

• Each PC is independent; can have separate technology (VME, PCI, CAMAC, etc)

• PC configuration can be changed easily; single VME crate readout for separate system tests possible.

• Multiple tasks could be run on one PC; e.g. run control, ECAL and event build

• Prefer PCs outside radiation area if possible

• Have own hub and network (cost?) or rely on network infrastructure at beam line?

DAQ software overview

Page 14: Paris Summary Part 2 and   Status of UK Electronics/DAQ

2 October 2003 Paul Dauncey 14

• For tests, assume worst case; each subsystem (ECAL, HCAL, beam monitoring and slow controls) read out with separate PC

• Require one socket-socket branch for each

DAQ topology

• Each branch can read out separate technology (VME, PCI, etc)• Monitor does not necessarily sample all events; its buffer

allows through events only when spare CPU available

Page 15: Paris Summary Part 2 and   Status of UK Electronics/DAQ

2 October 2003 Paul Dauncey 15

• First version of data structure software exists• Records and subrecords; loading/unloading, etc.• Arbitrary payload (templated) for subrecords

• First version of data transport software exists• Buffers, copiers, mergers, demergers, etc.• Arbitrary payload (templated) with specialisation for records

• First version of run control software exists• Both automatic (pre-defined) and manual run structures

• VME hardware access working• SBS 620 VME-PCI interface board installed in borrowed VME crate• Using Hardware Access Library (CERN/CMS)

• These work together• Sustained rates achieved depend critically on PCs, network between the PCs

on the different branches, compiler optimisation, inlining, etc; a lot of tuning needed

DAQ status

Page 16: Paris Summary Part 2 and   Status of UK Electronics/DAQ

2 October 2003 Paul Dauncey 16

• MIDAS (PSI)• No experience of using this in UK• Written for ~MByte data rates, ~100 Hz event rates, single PC systems• Limited state diagram; no ability to take different types of events in run• A lot of baggage (databases, slow controls); more complex than required• C, not C++, so less natural interface downstream (and not type-safe)

• XDAQ (CERN/CMS)• Significant experience of this in Imperial; useful to have experts on hand• Optimised for CMS; no beam spill structure and asynchronous trigger and

readout but easily deals with CALICE event rates and data sizes• Includes HAL automatically so (should be) simple to retrofit later• Deserves further investigation

• If moving to an existing system, XDAQ seems more suitable (?)• Beware of “3am crash” issue; it is hard to debug code written by other

people in a hurry…

DAQ alternatives: MIDAS? XDAQ?

Page 17: Paris Summary Part 2 and   Status of UK Electronics/DAQ

2 October 2003 Paul Dauncey 17

Electronics scheduleJ F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J A

Prototype 2 boards

Design

Layout

Fabrication and assembly

Testing

VFE PCB tests

Production 9 boards

Redesign

Layout

Fabrication and assembly

Testing, including Paris system cosmic tests

DESY beam test

2003 2004

Page 18: Paris Summary Part 2 and   Status of UK Electronics/DAQ

2 October 2003 Paul Dauncey 18

Board cost estimates (£k)Original Current

Prototype NRE 2.5 3.0

(2 boards) Components 8.0 7.8

Fabrication 1.0 1.5

Assembly 5.0 6.0

Production NRE 2.5 3.0

(9 boards) Components 35.0 35.1

Fabrication 4.5 6.5

Assembly 13.5 22.5

Total 72.0 85.4

N.B. fab/ass cost not final until board design and layout complete

Page 19: Paris Summary Part 2 and   Status of UK Electronics/DAQ

2 October 2003 Paul Dauncey 19

• Electronic boards were the major item but not total budget• Miscellaneous other electronics; £2k• Custom cables (100 needed); £15k• PC, disk, VME interface, VME crate; £4k, £8k, £4k, £6k

• Major saving in cables• VFE PCB will use same connector as readout board; don’t need custom• Number of VFE PCBs (and hence cables) reduced from doubling PCB

size• Off-the-shelf cables (70 needed); £6k

• Minor savings elsewhere• VME interface, VME crate; £3k, £5k

• Within a few £k of budget• Under-using travel so could transfer from there if necessary

Possible savings from rest of budget

Page 20: Paris Summary Part 2 and   Status of UK Electronics/DAQ

2 October 2003 Paul Dauncey 20

• There is progress in CALICE as a whole• Mechanics and electronics converging early next year• Aiming for DESY beam test in Aug 2004

• UK electronics going slowly• Six months behind schedule• Now critical path for ECAL as a whole• Also cost estimated to be going over budget

• Not gone critical (yet…)• After VFE test in Jan 2004, will disconnect from mechanical ECAL

assembly, giving a little breathing space• Next date to aim for is system test in Jul 2004• Cost overrun can probably be gained back from other sources

Summary