Upload
vuongnhi
View
212
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
9/19/2016
1
Practices Aligning Palo Verde ECP and HR In Changing Times
NAECP Fall 2016 ConferenceSeptember 27-29, 2016
Annapolis, MD
Tony MarcoDirector, PV HR
Michael SheaDirector, Safety Culture
David DuBeyManager, PV HR
Themes of Presentation
2
Overview of Palo Verde – nations largest power plant
Palo Verde Leadership Model – what binds us together
Top 20 ECP & HR Practices – how we partner together
Strategies for Success– sustain practices
Questions and Discussion – a time to talk
SAFELY and efficiently generateelectricity for the long term
3
9/19/2016
2
Palo Verde Participants
10.20% 5.91%
5.70%
29.10%17.49%
15.80%
15.80%
4
Palo VerdeUnique Aspects
and Considerations
• Three large independent standardized CE System 80 units– Economies of scale– Common mode vulnerability– Design has the highest number of
components• Two refueling outages per year• Large site (approximately 4,150
acres) and large Security Owner Controlled Area (SOCA)
• Separate independent Water Reclamation Facility
• Onsite Security, Fire Protection, Fuel Core Design/Analyses and Fuel Procurement Departments
5
• The station has been the nation’s largest power producer for 24 consecutive years, meeting the electrical needs of approximately 4 million people.
• Palo Verde produces 80% of Arizona's carbon free electricity.
• Palo Verde employs approximately 2600 employees.
• Reliable Performance− Six breaker-to-breaker runs
Other Facts
6
9/19/2016
3
2015 Nuclear Generation
US Rankings World Rankings
Rank Unit
GrossGeneration (millionMwH)
CapacityFactor
1 Palo Verde 1 12,233,702 99.61
2 Grand Gulf 1* 11,114,114 92.56
3 Millstone 3 11,112,626 99.42
4 Comanche Peak 1 11,095,077 101.32
5 Palo Verde 3 11,083,098 90.05
6 Nine Mile Point 2** 11,072,563 97.24
7 Palo Verde 2 10,991,609 89.24
8 Susquehanna 1** 10,908,973 96.76
9 McGuire 1 10,546,402 92.25
10 Diablo Canyon 2 10,183,417 97.12
Rank Unit
GrossGeneration (millionMwH)
CapacityFactor
1 Palo Verde 1 12,233,702 99.61
2 Grand Gulf 1* 11,114,114 92.56
3 Millstone 3 11,112,626 99.42
4 Comanche Peak 1 11,095,077 101.32
5 Palo Verde 3 11,083,098 90.05
6 Nine Mile Point 2** 11,072,563 97.24
7 Palo Verde 2 10,991,609 89.24
8 Susquehanna 1** 10,908,973 96.76
9 McGuire 1 10,546,402 92.25
10 Brokdorf* 10,345,488 87.20
Source: Nucleonics (Feb. 2016)*One month data missing.
** Net generation reported.7
Net Generation
Mill
ion
Meg
awat
t-ho
urs
8.8
13.5
23.4
7.8
20.6
25.125.6
22.023.2
27.0
28.8 29.530.3 30.4 30.4
28.8
30.9
28.628.1
25.8
24.0
26.8
29.2
30.6 31.231.3 31.9 31.4
32.3 32.5
5.06.07.08.09.0
10.011.012.013.014.015.016.017.018.019.020.021.022.023.024.025.026.027.028.029.030.031.032.033.0
Year
8
Nuclear Industry EmploymentDistribution by Age
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
18‐22 23‐27 28‐32 33‐37 38‐42 43‐47 48‐52 53‐57 58‐62 63‐67 67+
% employees
Age Range
2003 2005 2007 2009 2011
2013 2015 2005 Trend 2013 Trend 2015 Trend
Total Employment:
2015 - 56,568
2013 - 62,167
2011 - 59,700
2009 - 57,200
2007 - 55,900
2005 - 57,900
2003 - 58,400
Source: 2015 Gaps in the Energy Workforce Survey Results. Contractors and vendors not included.
9 9
9/19/2016
4
10
11
Palo Verde Distribution by Age and YOS
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
25 and under 26‐29 30‐34 35‐39 40‐44 45‐49 50‐54 55‐59 60‐64 65 and over
< 1 year 1‐2 years 3‐4 years 5‐9 years 10‐14 years 15‐19 years 20‐24 years 25‐29 years 30+ >
Palo Verde Leadership Model
What binds out team together
12
9/19/2016
5
13
The Palo Verde Leadership Model
14
Leadership Model Philosophies
• Every employee is a leader, regardless of title or position
• Results count• Values-driven organization• Attitude is important• Continuous learning organization• Communicate, Communicate,
Communicate• History + New + Change = Palo Verde Way
15
9/19/2016
6
Leadership Model Philosophies
• Knowledge is fundamental – share it• We are in the refueling outage business• Cost effective does not necessarily mean
cheap• Working efficiently and event free• Make conscious, informed decisions• Excellence in Operational Focus• Operations Leads the Station• End of Licenses and Beyond 60• Our Leadership Model - Our future
16
Top 20 ECP & HR Practices
How We Partner Together
17
Practices for Alignment
ECP Monthly andQuarterly Safety Culture
Meetings
Monthly meeting with ECP, HR and Legal
Focus on program issues
Anonymous Issues (CAP)
Discuss critical issues
Quarterly Safety Culture Meetings Follows NEI guidelines
Development of culture challenges
Measurement of safety culture indicators
22
People Health Committee
VP Level Participation
Alignment around HR Programs results
Focus on Talent Management
Succession Planning
Performance Management
Employee Issues
11
Key Performance Indicators
Employee turnover
EEOC Charges
Number of interactions
Status of open issues
Hiring results
33
18
9/19/2016
7
Practices for Alignment
Talent Acquisition Committee
Oversight of employee selection process
Senior leadership review and approval of all job postings
Review of selection choices
Management of staffing levels
Review of hiring results
66
Union Relations
Sharing of grievance info
Notification of contract preparation
Review of contract results
44
Discipline Review Panel
Notification of pending discipline Written Warning
Decision Making Suspension
Terminations
55
19
Practices for Alignment
HR Touch Points
Number of employee contacts within the HR department – 1400 YTD
Used to track and trend types of issues
Metrics shared with ECP as part of monthly meeting
99
Ethics
Aligned with Corporate Ethics Group (reports to HR VP)
Work in relationship with HR on ethics issues
77Integrated Issues Resolution
Process (IIRP)
Condition Reporting (CR)
Differing Professional Opinion (DPO)
Employee Concern Program
Mgmt Issue Tracking/Resolution (MITR)
Used to manage significate HR issues
Governed by organizational procedure
Time bound for resolution
88
20
Practices for Alignment
ECP Legal Interface
Monthly review with Legal Counsel on open issues
Review of critical cases with Executive VP
1010
Working Together
Understanding issues managed by HR and those managed by ECP
1111
Demographic Impact
Over 1,400 new hires in the last 7 years
Education and knowledge of ECP and HR
Projected another ~ 400 additional retirement in the next 5 years
1212
21
9/19/2016
8
Practices for Alignment
Employee Engagement Groups
Affinity groups focused on improving processes and results
Employee led with leader guidance
1313
New Hire Orientation
40 hour orientation for all new employees
ECP Supports HR during orientation with presentation and information
1414
PV Leadership Academy
Three (3) week training program for all new leaders
ECP and HR teach several topics during academy
1515
22
Practices for Alignment
Performance Objectives and Criteria (PO&C’s)
Industry criteria for HR• Succession Planning
• Selection
• Workforce Planning
• Knowledge Mgmt
• Leadership Development
1616
Organizational Oversight
PV Oversight Committee – reports to the Board of Directors
OSRC
1717
Delivering Nuclear Promise
Palo Verde Approach
Leverage of employee engagement groups
Future challenges
1818
23
Practices for Alignment
Anonymous Issues (CAP)
Managed by both HR and ECP
Align on how to address concern
Anyone can issue an anonymous concern (employee or contractor)
1919
Contractor ECP Involvement
Primary contractor labor supplier has provided their own ECP coordinator on site.
Weekly meetings with vendor ECP
2020
24
9/19/2016
9
Strategies for Success
Sustainability
25
Institutionalize your processes
Create guides or procedures to ensure sustainability
Have objective evidence that your programs are working
KPI’s – what are you measuring
Benchmark others and choose a process that works for your organization
Are you getting the results you areexpecting
Success Strategies
26
Questions and Discussion
Human Resources
How do you manage
resources?
Can you explain your DRP process?
Employee Concerns
27
9/19/2016
10
Thank you!!
Tony [email protected]
Michael [email protected]
David [email protected]
28