41
Page 1 Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010 Mike Spata February 24, 2010 Collider Review Retreat International Linear Collider

Page 1 Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010 Mike Spata February 24, 2010 Collider Review Retreat International Linear Collider

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Page 1 Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010 Mike Spata February 24, 2010 Collider Review Retreat International Linear Collider

Page 1

Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010

Mike SpataFebruary 24, 2010

Collider Review Retreat

International Linear

Collider

Page 2: Page 1 Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010 Mike Spata February 24, 2010 Collider Review Retreat International Linear Collider

Page 2

Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010

Outline

• Big Picture• Upgrade Path• Main Parameter Space• Electron Injector• Damping Rings• Damping Ring to Linac Beamline• Linac• Positron Source• Beam Delivery System• Interaction Region• SiD, LDC, GLD, 4th Detector Concepts• Detector Parameters

Page 3: Page 1 Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010 Mike Spata February 24, 2010 Collider Review Retreat International Linear Collider

Page 3

Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010

Big Picture

Page 4: Page 1 Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010 Mike Spata February 24, 2010 Collider Review Retreat International Linear Collider

Page 4

Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010

Big Picture

Page 5: Page 1 Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010 Mike Spata February 24, 2010 Collider Review Retreat International Linear Collider

Page 5

Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010

Big Picture • Polarized photocathode electron source (> 80%

polarized) with Warm RF Buncher/Pre-Accelerator (76 MeV)

• 5 GeV Superconducting Injector Linac

• Electron and Positron Damping Rings (6.7 km circumference)

• Beam transport from the damping rings to the main linacs, followed by a two-stage bunch compressor system prior to injection into the main linac

• Undulator-based positron source powered by 150 GeV electrons

• Two 11 km long main linacs, utilizing 1.3 GHz SCRF cavities, operating at an average gradient of 31.5 MV/m to accelerate the beams up to 500 GeV

• 4.5 km long beam delivery system, which brings the two beams into collision with a 14 mrad crossing angle, at a single interaction point which can be shared by two detectors

Page 6: Page 1 Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010 Mike Spata February 24, 2010 Collider Review Retreat International Linear Collider

Page 6

Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010

Upgrade Path

• Upgrade Positron source to produce polarized beams

• Run facility as an e--e- Collider

• Extend tunnels 11km for Energy upgrade to 1 TeV

• Collide electrons at IP with a high energy laser beam to produce photons and operate as an e--γ or γ-γ Collider

Page 7: Page 1 Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010 Mike Spata February 24, 2010 Collider Review Retreat International Linear Collider

Page 7

Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010

Basic Design Parameters

a) Value at 500 GeV Center of Mass Energy

Page 8: Page 1 Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010 Mike Spata February 24, 2010 Collider Review Retreat International Linear Collider

Page 8

Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010

Technology Challenges

• Beam instability and kicker hardware constraints in the damping rings

• Beam current, beam power and pulse length limitations in the main linacs

• Emittance preservation requirements, in the main linacs and in the beam delivery system;

• Background control and kink instability issues in the interaction region.

Page 9: Page 1 Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010 Mike Spata February 24, 2010 Collider Review Retreat International Linear Collider

Page 9

Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010

Nominal and Design Range

Page 10: Page 1 Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010 Mike Spata February 24, 2010 Collider Review Retreat International Linear Collider

Page 10

Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010

Parameter Options

Page 11: Page 1 Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010 Mike Spata February 24, 2010 Collider Review Retreat International Linear Collider

Page 11

Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010

Technical ChallengesThe SLC polarized electron source already meets the requirements for polarization, chargeand lifetime. The primary challenge for the ILC electron source is the 1 ms long bunch train,which demands a laser system beyond that used at any existing accelerator.

Electron Injector

Functional Requirements• Generate the required bunch train of polarized electrons (> 80% polarization)• Capture and accelerate the beam to 5 GeV• Transport the beam to the electron damping ring with minimal beam loss, and performan energy compression and spin rotation prior to injection.

Page 12: Page 1 Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010 Mike Spata February 24, 2010 Collider Review Retreat International Linear Collider

Page 12

Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010

Injector Optics

Beam Transport along the 76 MeV Warm Injector

Page 13: Page 1 Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010 Mike Spata February 24, 2010 Collider Review Retreat International Linear Collider

Page 13

Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010

Injector Optics

Beam Envelope along the 76 MeV Warm Injector

Beam Transport along the 5 GeV SRF Injector Linac

Page 14: Page 1 Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010 Mike Spata February 24, 2010 Collider Review Retreat International Linear Collider

Page 14

Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010

Injector OpticsBeam Transport from Booster Linac to Damping Ring

Page 15: Page 1 Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010 Mike Spata February 24, 2010 Collider Review Retreat International Linear Collider

Page 15

Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010

Electron Source Parameters

Page 16: Page 1 Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010 Mike Spata February 24, 2010 Collider Review Retreat International Linear Collider

Page 16

Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010

Damping Ring Layout

Technical Challenges• Control of the electron cloud effect in the positron damping ring. This effect, which

can cause instability, tune spread, and emittance growth has been seen in a number of other rings and is relatively well understood.

• Control of the fast ion instability in the electron damping ring.• Development of a very fast rise and fall time kicker for single bunch injection and

extraction in the ring (3ns bunch spacing)

• 6.7 km circumference

• 6 arcs and 6 straight sections

• Normal conducting transport system

• 250 m of superconducting wigglers in each damping ring

• 650 MHz RF system (1/2 linac frequency)

• Arcs composed of TME cells to minimize quantum excitation

• Straights composed of FODO cells to accommodate the damping wigglers, RF cavities and the injection/extraction regions

• Two families of sextupoles within TME cells for chromatic correction

Functional Requirements• Accept e- and e+ beams with large transverse and longitudinal emittances and

produce the low-emittance beams required for luminosity production• Damp incoming beam jitter (transverse and longitudinal) and provide highly stable

beams for downstream systems• Delay bunches from the source to allow feed-forward systems to compensate for

pulse to pulse variations in parameters such as the bunch charge.

Page 17: Page 1 Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010 Mike Spata February 24, 2010 Collider Review Retreat International Linear Collider

Page 17

Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010

Damping Ring Parameters

Page 18: Page 1 Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010 Mike Spata February 24, 2010 Collider Review Retreat International Linear Collider

Page 18

Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010

Damping Ring RF Parameters

Page 19: Page 1 Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010 Mike Spata February 24, 2010 Collider Review Retreat International Linear Collider

Page 19

Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010

Damping Ring Optics

Page 20: Page 1 Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010 Mike Spata February 24, 2010 Collider Review Retreat International Linear Collider

Page 20

Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010

Damping Ring Dynamic Aperture

Dynamic aperture of the ILC Damping Ring for relative momentum errors of -1%, 0% and 1%The thick green line represents the size of the injected positron beam.

Page 21: Page 1 Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010 Mike Spata February 24, 2010 Collider Review Retreat International Linear Collider

Page 21

Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010

Damping Ring to Linac

Technical Challenges• Control of emittance growth due to static misalignments, resulting in

dispersion andcoupling.• Suppression of phase and amplitude jitter in the bunch compressor RF, which

can leadto timing errors at the IP. RMS phase jitter of 0.24 between the electron and positronRF systems results in a 2% loss of luminosity.

Functional Requirements • Transport of the electron and positron beams from the damping rings at the

center of the ILC accelerator complex to the upstream ends of their respective linacs

• Collimation of the beam halo generated in the damping ring• Rotation of the spin polarization vector from the vertical to any arbitrary angle

required at the IP• Compression of the long Damping Ring bunch length by a factor of 30-45 to

provide the short bunches required by the Main Linac and the IP

Page 22: Page 1 Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010 Mike Spata February 24, 2010 Collider Review Retreat International Linear Collider

Page 22

Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010

Ring to Main Linac Optics From start of turn-around arc to match point at entrance of Main Linac

Page 23: Page 1 Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010 Mike Spata February 24, 2010 Collider Review Retreat International Linear Collider

Page 23

Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010

Ring to Main Linac Parameters

Page 24: Page 1 Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010 Mike Spata February 24, 2010 Collider Review Retreat International Linear Collider

Page 24

Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010

Linac

Page 25: Page 1 Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010 Mike Spata February 24, 2010 Collider Review Retreat International Linear Collider

Page 25

Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010

Linac

Technical Challenges• Achieving the design average accelerating gradient of 31.5 MV/m.• Control of emittance growth due to static misalignments, resulting in

dispersion and coupling.• Control of the beam energy spread

Functional Requirements • Accelerate the beam while preserving the small bunch emittances• Control of higher-order modes in the accelerating cavities• Maintain the beam energy spread within the design requirement of 0.1 % at

the IP• Not introduce significant transverse or longitudinal jitter

Page 26: Page 1 Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010 Mike Spata February 24, 2010 Collider Review Retreat International Linear Collider

Page 26

Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010

Electron Linac Optics

Page 27: Page 1 Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010 Mike Spata February 24, 2010 Collider Review Retreat International Linear Collider

Page 27

Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010

Linac Parameters

Page 28: Page 1 Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010 Mike Spata February 24, 2010 Collider Review Retreat International Linear Collider

Page 28

Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010

Main 250 GeV Linac

Page 29: Page 1 Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010 Mike Spata February 24, 2010 Collider Review Retreat International Linear Collider

Page 29

Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010

Gradient Challenge

Page 30: Page 1 Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010 Mike Spata February 24, 2010 Collider Review Retreat International Linear Collider

Page 30

Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010

Positron Source

Technical Challenges• 150 m long superconducting helical undulator• Ti-alloy target, which is a cylindrical wheel 1.4 cm thick and 1 m in

diameter, which must rotate at 100 m/s in vacuum to limit damage by the photon beam

• Normal-conducting RF system which captures the positron beam, must sustain high accelerator gradients during millisecond-long pulses in a strong magnetic field, while providing adequate cooling in spite of high RF and particle-loss heating.

Functional Requirements • Generate a high-power multi-MeV photon production drive beam• Produce the needed positron bunches in a metal target that can reliably

deal with the beam power and induced radioactivity• Capture and accelerate the beam to 5 GeV• Transport the beam to the positron damping ring with minimal beam loss,

and performenergy compression and spin rotation prior to injection.

Page 31: Page 1 Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010 Mike Spata February 24, 2010 Collider Review Retreat International Linear Collider

Page 31

Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010

Positron Source Parameters

Page 32: Page 1 Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010 Mike Spata February 24, 2010 Collider Review Retreat International Linear Collider

Page 32

Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010

Beam Delivery System Parameters

Technical Challenges• Tight tolerances on magnet motion (down to tens of nanometers)• Uncorrelated relative phase jitter between the crab cavity systems• Control of emittance growth due to static misalignments• Control of backgrounds at the IP via careful tuning and optimization• Clean extraction of the high-powered disrupted beam to the dump.

Functional Requirements• Measure the linac beam and match it into the Final Focus• Protect the beamline and detector against mis-steered beams from the main linacs• Remove any large amplitude particles (beam-halo) from the linac to minimize backgroundin the detectors• Measure and monitor the key physics parameters such as energy and polarization beforeand after the collisions.

Page 33: Page 1 Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010 Mike Spata February 24, 2010 Collider Review Retreat International Linear Collider

Page 33

Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010

Beam Delivery System Parameters

Page 34: Page 1 Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010 Mike Spata February 24, 2010 Collider Review Retreat International Linear Collider

Page 34

Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010

SiD Concept

Page 35: Page 1 Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010 Mike Spata February 24, 2010 Collider Review Retreat International Linear Collider

Page 35

Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010

LDC Concept

Page 36: Page 1 Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010 Mike Spata February 24, 2010 Collider Review Retreat International Linear Collider

Page 36

Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010

LDC Concept

¼ Cutout of LDC Detector

Side View of Vertex Detector

Page 37: Page 1 Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010 Mike Spata February 24, 2010 Collider Review Retreat International Linear Collider

Page 37

Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010

GLD Concept

Page 38: Page 1 Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010 Mike Spata February 24, 2010 Collider Review Retreat International Linear Collider

Page 38

Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010

GLD Concept

Page 39: Page 1 Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010 Mike Spata February 24, 2010 Collider Review Retreat International Linear Collider

Page 39

Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010

4th Detector Concept

Page 40: Page 1 Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010 Mike Spata February 24, 2010 Collider Review Retreat International Linear Collider

Page 40

Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010

Detector Parameters

Page 41: Page 1 Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010 Mike Spata February 24, 2010 Collider Review Retreat International Linear Collider

Page 41

Collider Review Retreat February 24, 2010

Questions

Thanks.