P-8A MMA Configuration

• Common cabinets for ease of access and maintenance• Room for growth—23% more floor space than P-3• Improved power distribution with reserve• Improved ECS for increased electronics MTBF• High speed (.82 Mach) and high altitude (41K max)• Modern open system architecture• Improved crew accommodations

Search Radar

Flight Deck

Life Rafts (2)

Aerial Refueler

Power Distribution Racks (2)

Mission Equipment Racks (4)

Lav B

Sonobuoy Storage Racks (2)Weapons Bay

Automated Rotary Launchers (3)

Tactical Workstations (5)

Mission Planning

Communications RackMission Equipment Rack

Galley G4

INMARSAT Antenna

MAD

Folding StairsCrew Rest

Observer Stations (2)

CFM56-7B 180 kVAIDG Engines (2)

Wing Pylons (2 per Wing)

StorageAccess Hatch

Organic Equipment Space Provision

Storage

Seating/Ditching (6)

Growth Space Provision

Tactical Workstation Growth (1)

Green = Growth (200 ft3, 1,000 lb total)Blue = Deployment

Growth Space Provision

Radar LRU Space Provision

P-8A MMA Acquisition Snapshot

System Integration

System Demonstration

System Dev & Demonstration

Low-RateInitial

Production(LRIP)

Operations& Support

ConceptExploration

ComponentAdvanced

Development

Concept & Tech Development

Full-Rate Production

& Deployment(FRP)

Production & Deployment

C20Mar00

BA 11Jan0228May04

FY07

DRR FRP

FY13FY10

OIPT

22Jun06

FY04-13: SDD• Boeing contract

award 14Jun04• Fleet

involvement thru FIT & ITT

• 7 flight test aircraft

• Total planned inventory – 108

Boeing737-800ERX

FY02-04: CAD• Multiple contracts awarded

for MMA system– Defined MMA system

architecture– Thorough risk analysis– Validated Operational

Requirements Document (ORD)

– Detailed cost analysis

Boeing

LockheedMartin

P-8A Spiral ONE

Boeing

EADS

BAELockheed Martin

UAV’s

FY00-02: CE

BAMS-UAS&

Global HawkMaritime Demo

Raytheon

Component AdvancedDevelopment

2 Yr Risk Reduction Effort

Risk Management

020406080

100120140160180

Program Start Pre-Proposal Milestone B

LowMediumHigh

CAD

ProvisionsFor UAV

Integration

SystemArchitecture Alternative

ConceptStudies

SystemPerformance

RequirementsTo Meet

ORD/CDD

TotalOwnership

CostAnalysis

TechnologyReadiness

Assessment

OverallTest

Strategy

DetailedRisk

AnalysesCAD

ProvisionsFor UAV

Integration

SystemArchitecture Alternative

ConceptStudies

SystemPerformance

RequirementsTo Meet

ORD/CDD

TotalOwnership

CostAnalysis

TechnologyReadiness

Assessment

OverallTest

Strategy

DetailedRisk

Analyses

Key Lessons Learned

• Lack of adequate program maturity at MS B– Ill defined requirements– Lack of robust requirements management– Risky technical approach

• Failure to involve independent technical community at program initiation• Lack of early independent cost analysis (AIR-4.2) in POM/PR

– Ill defined CARD– O&S costs not well understood– Failure to budget for long lead items– Test program correction of deficiencies not adequately planned for

• Lack of technical insight & risk management process– Lack of automated SE tools– Inadequate use of metrics– Lack of appropriate technical expertise

• Government acting as integrator by default• Inadequate program technical staff and future staffing plans• Lack of horizontal/vertical SE integration (i.e., Battlespace Engineering,

Aviation/Ship integration)• Overly optimistic Acq/PM strategy/schedule• Comprehensive use of EVM and TPMs

Back-Up

DAU Program Start-up Workshop• Set the foundation for SDD success

• Many DoD programs struggle or fail due in part to:– Lack of common Vision and plan for success– Lack of supportive environment– Disagreements over program baseline

• Foster sense of trust, teaming, and honest discussions

• Produced useful Workshop products

• Educated Industry on Govt’s Warfighter Requirements

• Educated Government on Industry “Best Practices”Key Accomplishment: Taking the time to have Navy and Boeing Team Lead counterparts sit down with one-another in a relaxed forum to discuss broad

based and team focused challenges.

P-8A MMA Manufacturing Flow

Spirit AeroSystemsWichita, Kansas

MMA Fuselage

Boeing Commercial AirplanesRenton, Washington

MMA wings, empennage, aircraft assembly, engine installations

Boeing Integrated Defense Systems

Seattle, WashingtonMission systems/I&CO

Aircraft delivery

SDD and Production

P-8A MMA Acquisition Strategy

• Structured on an evolutionary systems replacement approach– Established sound program foundation based on an iterative requirements

definition process with warfighters and industry, thorough risk analysis of competing concepts, and detailed cost analysis of evolving concepts

– Provides a transformational product in minimal time to users while promoting evolutionary growth in capabilities through spiral development

• Defined in a capstone document that summarizes individual statutory and regulatory plans in order to communicate to leadership the total discipline approach to acquiring a system that recapitalizes the capabilities now provided by the P-3C

Activity Name1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4

FY 2000 FY 2001 FY 2002 FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011

MMA

MS-0 CAD DR MS-B DRR MS-CIPROIPTReviews...

PMR-PEO(A)

PMR-Boeing

LRIP#1 LRIP#2Stage-IIAircraft & AP-2 & AP-3SDD AP-1CAD

Contract Awards.

Quantities 3 4 6 8CE CECAD CADSDD System Development & Demonstration

Reviews...

Deliveries PDRSFRIBRSRR CDR

Stage I 1 1 1Stage 2 2 1 1

T&E... T&E

P&D P&D P

Systems Engineering Process Rigor

Naval Systems Engineering Process

• Documented in Naval Systems Engineering Guide

• Uses Industry Standard EIA-632 as a framework, but incorporates elements of MIL-STD-499B, IEEE-1220, ISO15288

• Identifies 13 Processes and 33 Sub-processes for engineering a system

• Provides information regarding inputs, outputs, entry criteria, exit criteria, references, agents, tools and methods that Navy engineering teams may use to accomplish each Sub-process.

Technical Review Timeline

Component Advanced Development Process

CAIVIMPACTS

THREATDOCS

TEMPC4ISP

M&S PLAN

MAAD

CONOPS

OPSITSTACSITS

OTHERS…

IRD

DRAFTSYS

RQTS

ESOH

SOO

MISSION/ SYSTEMSEFFECTIVENESSANALYSIS

COST/PERFORMANCE TRADES

MMA SYSTEM

TRADE SPACE

AFFORDABILITYANALYSIS

DRAFT SYSTEMS

PERFORMANCESPEC

DRAFT

ORD

Integration of Requirements Refinement, Concept Definition, and Cost Analysis

P-8A MMA Requirements EvolutionConcept Exploration Component Advanced Development

INDUSTRY CONCEPT STUDIESANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVES

DRAFT CAD RFP

CAD RFPCAD AWARDS

INDUSTRY COMMENTS

CAD PHASE MISSION/SYSTEMS EFFECTIVENESSANALYSIS AND COST/PERFORMANCE TRADES

Pre-MS Activities

1998 Requirements Analysis Study

1999 Technical and EconomicFeasibility Assessment

Validated ORD

•Block I•Block II•…•…•Block N

MNSFEB 00

IRD 1OCT 01

IRD 2DEC 01

IRD 3FEB 02

DRAFT ORDJUL 02

COST, TECHNICALSCHEDULE FACTORS

Road to Milestone B:• Source Selection for SDD• Concept Development and Risk analysis/reduction

• Requirements definition, refinement, & validation (Pre-MS B SRRs w/each competitor)

• Concept Cost Analysis

CAD Phase Takeaways

Effective integration of discrete activities, orchestrated to execute in a concurrent, effective manner

Requirementsloop

•SS Specifications

•SCDs•SRSs• ICDs• IDDs•Test plans

Functional model

Requirements analysis

Functionalanalysis

Allocation andsynthesis

•Trade Studies•Program and Technical Plans

Customerrequirementsdatabase

MMA PBS

CONOPSDRM

ORD/CDD

SDD Systems Engineering Process and Major Products

PBSS

Systems Analysis and Control Assessment and Balance of Technical Risk, Cost, and Schedule

Develop, Buy,Produce

•Product Specifications

•Product Drawings• ICDs• IDDs (design)•Design Documents •Verify Plans and

Procedures

Designloop

SRRSFRPDRCDR

Build anddev test loop

•Performance Specifications•Design Trades•Preliminary Product Specs•Preliminary Verification Plans

Legend:

Annex

RTS CSCI SRS

Annex

Annex AnnexAnnexAnnex

AnnexAnnex

Level 1 System Functional Baseline

Level 3 Product Baseline

Level 2 Allocated Baseline

P-8A MMA System Preliminary Design BaselineSpecification Tree (CI/CSCI) in DOORS

Comm SCDs(8)

SMS SCD

MCDS HW SCDs(12)

TOMSCSCI SRS

Mission System Segment Specification

Mission tng sys PIDS

TSSC Sys PIDS

Training System Segment Specification

Acous-tics

SCD

Radar/ IFF

SCDESM SCD

EWSP SCD

MADSCD

Sensors WTT CIDS

WLT CIDS

Com-puting CIDS

OFT CIDS

PTT CIDS

IAT CIDS

Facility reqts

TOFT CIDS

Logistics System Segment Specification

Pilot tng sys PIDS

TS to facility IRS

TS to TSSC IRS

External IRS

Transactional use case analysis

Productiondrawings

Productspecs

PhysicalHW

PhysicalSW

Facility reqtsdocument

External IDD

Core use case analysis

FunctionalDescriptionDocument

Annex AAnnex BAppendix BAppendix JAppendix RAppendix U

PBSS

ORD/CDD

EO/IR SCD

Aircraft System Segment Specification

Supportdocs

IFF inter SCD

Designdocs

Verif/testplans/proc

• Flt mgt cmtr sys/MCDU SW• HMS SW• Display elec unit SW• Enhanced digital flt cont SW• Stall mgt/yaw damper sys• Air data inertial ref sys• Enhanced ground proximity warning sys• Head-up display sys• MMA control panels• Nav IFF transponder• Nav GPS• RTP• FDIU• EGI• IFF transponder• GPS antenna sys

• Weapon pylon, fuselage• Weapon pylon, wing• Ejector, 14 in• Ejector, 30 in• Sonobuoy launching sys • Power distr panel

• Secondary power distr sys• Electrical power gen sys

1,240 requirements31 reqt changes 2.5%=

Requirements Volatility

• CDLS• V/UHF• ICS• BI• INMARSAT

• ACP• HF• OTCIXS• SAT SW unit

• CE-IOB• DVR• NSS• Black IOB• Ordnance panel• Color printer• Secure SW unit• Network accelerator

• FD DP• VIU• Ethernet SW• Time dist sys• LAN cont• SNS• Crew WS

SRRSFRPDR

CDRFuture input to DOORS

Legend:

Maint tng sys PIDS

Air-frame subsysreqts

Flt deck and avionicssubsys reqts

Interiorssubsys reqts

Utility subsystems reqts

Armamentsubsys reqts

Wiringsubsys reqts

Power and propulsionsubsys reqts

Key Processes

• Systems Engineering Plans and Process (SEP and SEMP)• Configuration Management Process• Technology Readiness Assessment (TRA) Process• Trade Study Process• Risk and Opportunity Management Process• Technical Performance Measures (TPMs) Process• Human Systems Integration Plan• Electromagnetic Environmental Effects (EEE) Plans• Contractor Logistics Support (CLS) Plan• System Security Plans• System Safety Plans• Interface Control and Interface Management Plans• Producibility• Quality System Plan

Technology Readiness Assessment

• Conducted during CAD– Independent assessment panel consisting of members from the Naval

Air Systems Command (NAVAIR), Office of Naval Research (ONR), and academia (John Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory (JHU-APL)).

• TRA identified four Critical Technology Elements (CTEs) through a comprehensive review of the MMA program work breakdown structure (WBS) reflecting the Boeing CAD phase configuration baseline prior to SDD source selection

1. Integrated Sonobuoy Launcher System2. Electronic Support Measures (ESM) system3. Data Fusion4. Acoustics Subsystem

• None of the P-8A CTE impact ability to meet program Key Performance Parameters (KPP)

Risk Management ProcessWho

ResponsibleFunction orIndividual

Input Output

LEGENDStart orEnd

Task A Connector QRQualityRecord

Decision

Major Process Tasks for: Risk ManagementMMA Program Management

AnyTeam

Member

BoeingCompanyPolicies &

Procedures

MMAProgram

Policies &Procedures

Beginning

Identify and SubmitRisk Candidates

EndingBoundary Task

DocumentsRisk

Closure

ReviewPlan

ReviewStatus of

Risk & Plan

RiskOwner

RiskMitigation

PlanAcceptable?

Continue withRisk

Plan?

Yes

No

Yes

No

Yes

No

ValidRisk?

RiskMitigated

?

Yes YesProgram-LevelRisk?

Team-LevelRisk

Program

Review Board(PRRB)

IPT

No

Process Owner:

Program

Review Board(PRRB)

or

Team RiskReview Board(as applicable)

Boundry Task

PromoteRisk?

YesIPTLeader

No

No

YesManaged

Risk?

No

WatchItem

END

END

Mitigation

Affordability

Risk

Risk

Control

ImplementPlan

Risk &

Plan HandlingOptions/

Mitigation and Fallback Plan, if necessary

Assess

Likelihood

Consequence

Risk

B

B

A

RiskRejected

RiskMitigated

CWIP

LEAN

Assign /Re-Assign

Owner

A

and

1

2

3

45

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15 16

17

• Fully integrated RMB with Industry

• Definition and implementation of process

• Facilitated by Boeing IDE

Opportunity ManagementThe Sister of Risk

OpportunitiesHIGH (Gold) - Major benefit likely. Priority management attention required.

MEDIUM (Silver) - Some benefit. Additional management attention may be required.

LOW (Bronze) - Minimum benefit. Minimum oversightneeded to pursue opportunity.

OpportunitiesHIGH (Gold) - Major benefit likely. Priority management attention required.

MEDIUM (Silver) - Some benefit. Additional management attention may be required.

LOW (Bronze) - Minimum benefit. Minimum oversightneeded to pursue opportunity.

O P P O R T U N I T YO P P O R T U N I T Y

IDENTIFY OpportunityASSESS

• Likelihood & Consequence• 5x5 OpportunityAssessment Matrix

PLAN• Capture, Transfer, Ignore, or Pursue

the Opportunity• Establish Opportunity events,

Responsibilities and SchedulesCONTROL

• Monitor Actions, Correct Deviations,and Re-plan as Appropriate

• Promote or Demote Opportunity as Appropriate

COMMUNICATE• Populate Database, Keep it Current,

and Make it Accessible to All

O P P O R T U N I T YO P P O R T U N I T Y

IDENTIFY OpportunityASSESS

• Likelihood & Consequence• 5x5 OpportunityAssessment Matrix

PLAN• Capture, Transfer, Ignore, or Pursue

the Opportunity• Establish

Responsibilities and SchedulesCONTROL

• Monitor Actions, Correct Deviations,and Re-plan as Appropriate

• Promote or Demote Appropriate

COMMUNICATE• Populate Database, Keep it Current,

and Make it Accessible to All

Consequence1 2 3 4 5-1-2-3-4-5

1

2

3

4

5

Like

lihoo

d

Risks Opportunities

Consequence1 2 3 4 5-1-2-3-4-5

1

2

3

4

5

Like

lihoo

d

Risks Opportunities

Consequence1 2 3 4 5-1-2-3-4-5

1

2

3

4

5

Like

lihoo

d

Risks Opportunities

TPMs(Status as of 14Jul06)

Range

Alt

Interop

Ao

KPPs

ASW wt

nmi

1,135 1,200 1,265 1,330 1,395

A/C Operating Weight Klb

112,648 111,448 110,248 109,078 107,878

Aerodynamic Drag counts383.9 377.9 374.9 371.9 368.9 365.9 362.9 359.9

Operational Availability %

50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90

Electrical Power Util kVA

243 226 209 192 175 158 140 124 107

ECS Thermal Utilization kW

97 90 83 76 69

MCDS CPU Utilization(OMI) % of target

70 65 60 55 50 45 40 35 30

MCDS Lan Utilization % of target

55 50 45 40 35 28 21 14 7

MCDS Memory Utilization % of target

55 50 45 40 35 30 25 20 15

MCDS Storage Utilization % of target

120 100 90 40

EMI (cosite margin) counts

33 30 27 24 21 18 15 12 9

Operations & Support Costs normalized

1.10 1.0 .95 .90 .85 .80 .75 .70

Production Unit Cost 04 $ in Mil

1.06 1.03 1.0 .97 .94 .91 .88 .85 .82

Interoperability (# of PBSS IERs)9 24 39 54 69 84 99 114 129

Worst Case PBS Survivabili % Sur.

.96 .98 1.0 1.02 1.04 1.06 1.08 1.10 1.12

Vulnerability Av %

1.2 1.1 1 .9 .8 .7 .6 .5 .4

Fusion Track Accuracy Heading

1.2 1.1 1 .9 .8 .7 .6 .5 .4

C31SR Initial On Station Alt. Ft 15,000 25,000 30,000 35,000 45,000 55,000

ASW Weapon Loadout In work

80 60

Mission Perf./ Radius of Action

1,3561,300

108,445109,660

371372.6

77.5 80

151155

71.8 71.8

65 65

53 53

7783

.91 88

54 54

1.03 1.1

.52 .52

under review

36,64336,402

19 19

11 IOC = 0

7 / 7

SRR Lessons Learned

• Joint team attitude to address issues openly and overtly and proactively run actions to ground as a high priority during and after review will continue to serve program well. Critique acceptance and addressal will assist in successful execution and maintains credibility

• System Specification had moderate instability post-SRR due to Segment SRRs and the decomposition and allocation of requirements as the functional baseline was established (expected in the SE iterative loop, level of System Spec stability a good indicator of solid CAD phase and SRR)

• A robust requirements management tool (i.e., DOORS) with clear, clean links from top-level (CDD/Performance) requirements down through all levels of the specification tree to detailed requirements (at PDR/CDR) is essential

SFR Lessons Learned

• Derived Mission Functions and associated architectural flow needs to be kept alive under change control as a living part of the design baseline

• Functions and associated allocations must be used by product teams to identify and reconcile gaps in requirements

• Product team System Use Cases and associated functions must be linked to Transactional Mission Use Cases to identify and reconcile functional gaps (Software functional areas in particular)

• Trade Studies and Design Changes must consider the specification tree from top to bottom including the linked functions (DOORS extracts used at CCBs)

• SFR preparation improved intra and cross team communication• SFR preparation led to customer ‘buy in’ on technical approach and

maturity• SFR preparation led to an exponential increase in the number of

System Level Requirements experts, and Mission Usage experts

PDR Lessons Learned

• EVM implementation and team utilization is a continual study and refinement process to ensure proper CAM focus and Team Lead expectations are understood

• IDE is a productivity multiplier for team communications and insight into program status

• Value of design reviews is the build up and incremental review preparation process leading to the early identification of risks and issues to program execution

• Government teams expend considerable energy working processes and communications with the Prime contractor; the same needs to occur between the Prime and subcontractors

• Efficient budget execution is the best defense for budget development and prioritization

A Quality Team

Prime ContractorSub Contractors

A Rock Solid FoundationOf Respect and Trust

Firmly Supporting an EnvironmentOf Common Goals

Transition into SDD

• Contract award – 14 June 2004– Required completion of Source Selection prior to Milestone B– Approval from MDA to enter SDD through the Milestone B DAB

• Approval of Acquisition Strategy• Determination of fully funded program based on CAIG assessment• Approval of Acquisition Program Baseline

• Teaming with Industry – Program Start-up Workshop

• Management by Metrics– Risk Management Process– Opportunity Management– Technical Performance Measurement – Earned Value Management

Program Best Practicesfor SDD

Earned Value Management Reporting

ControlAccountSchedulesTier IV

Earned Value Management Reporting Via Tier IV IMS

Product ScheduleTier III

ProgramElement ScheduleTier II

ProgramMaster ScheduleTier I

IntegratedMaster Plan(IMP)

CAMS CAMS CAMS

• Program summary• Major milestones

• Major program elements• Customer and ACA

interfaces

• Cross-functional integrated baseline

• Key interface milestones

• Detailed, measurable tasks

• Vertically linked: IMP, IPTs

• Horizontally linked: account

CAMS

IMS from contract award through PDR:20,141 tasks resource loaded (labor-hours)

Integrated Baseline Review

Purpose – Achieve mutual understanding of baseline plan and relationship to underlying EVMS and processes during contract execution

Objectives – Evaluate the performance measurement baseline to ensure:

• Entire technical scope of work captured• Sufficient contract budget and schedule• Budget properly allocated at the right level• Resources adequately assigned• Proper implementation of management processes

Gain insight into cost and schedule risk areas associated with contract Develop confidence in the program’s operating plans