1
Conventional Model Impact of Degree of Spatial Harmonics by Calculating Natural Frequency Prediction of Natural Frequency (Mathematical Methods) Calculation of Impact of Degree Factor of Spatial Harmonics Exception Spatial Harmonics with Small Impact from the Analysis Analysis of Main Vibration Factors by Separating Vibration Source Time / Spatial Harmonic Separation of Radial Force (FEA) Extraction of Major Vibration Factor Orders Selection of Design Variable for Vibration Reduction Improved Model Process of the vibration analysis using spatial harmonics and time harmonics of radial force density I. Introduction In this paper, we propose a process of the vibration analysis using spatial harmonics and time harmonics of radial force density as shown in Fig.. For this purpose, this study suggests the impact of degree factor to limit the order of spatial harmonics and deduct the component that has a significant influence on vibration through time, spatial harmonics separation, and calculation of the vibration. Finally, the vibrations of the conventional model and improved model were analyzed, and the validity of the result was verified through the manufactured prototype and vibration test. II. Impact of Degree of Spatial Harmonics by Calculating Natural Frequency Description Symbol Value Unit Peak value of the phase current I max 14.5 A pk Rotation speed - 5000 rpm Stator outer diameter D so 96 mm Rotor outer diameter D ro 60 mm Airgap length g 0.5 mm Stack length L stk 26.95 mm A. Specification of Conventional Model B. Prediction of Natural Frequency and Calculation of Impact of Degree Factor of Spatial Harmonics ( ) 2 1 Ω 2 1 1 c c c c r c r mr v ρ E R π M K π f = = Circumferential Mode Shape Vibration Velocity for r-th mode Natural Frequency in r-th mode ( ) ( ) 2 2 2 / 2 / 1 1 mr rn m mr rn m f f ζ f f h + = 2 1 = mr m v f f k = = 1 n rn r V V m rn mr c stk si rn rn h P ω M L D π f π V 2 2 = Vibration Velocity for r-th space harmonics and n-th time harmonics Mode 3 Mode 0 Mode 2 Mode 1 Mode 5 Mode 4 Magnification Factor Vibration Influence Factor 0 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 Natural Frequency [Hz] Circumferential Mode 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 Magnification factor f r /f m ζm = 0.05 ζm = 0.1 ζm = 0.2 ζm = 0.3 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 Vibration Influence Factor Circumferential Mode Cross-section of conventional model III. Analysis of Main Vibration Factors by Seperating the Vibration Source A. Time / Spatial Harmonics Separation of Radial Force Density ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) t θ B μ t θ B t θ B μ t θ p r t r , 2 1 , , 2 1 , 2 0 2 2 0 = ( ) ( ) = = = 0 0 cos , r n e rn θ r t ω n P t θ p Radial Force Density ωt = π/2 ωt = 3π/4 ωt = 0 ωt = π/4 θ = 0deg 0 200 400 600 800 0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 360 Radial Force Density [kN/m 2 ] ωt 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 Radial Force Density [kN/m 2 ] Spatial Harmonics 10fe 8fe 6fe 4fe 2fe 0fe 0.0000 0.0002 0.0004 0.0006 0.0008 0.0010 0.0012 0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 Vibration Velocity [m/s] Spatial Harmonics 10fe 8fe 6fe 4fe 2fe 0fe Time Harmonics 2fe 4fe 6fe 8fe 10fe Spatial Harmonics 4, 8, 16, 20 4, 16, 28 0, 12, 24 4, 8, 20, 32 4, 8, 16 B. Extraction of Major Vibration Factor Orders C. Improved Design for Vibration Reduction R ro R tap = R ro d tap d tap Objective Function 1. Minimizing the cogging torque 2. 20% reduction in the electromagnetic vibration 0.0000 0.0005 0.0010 0.0015 0.0020 0.0025 0.0030 0.0035 Total 0fe 2fe 4fe 6fe 8fe 10fe 12fe 14fe 16fe 18fe 20fe 22fe Vibration Velocity [m/s] Time Harmonics Time / Spatial harmonic separation of the vibration velocity Vibration velocity according to the vibration frequency 0 0.03 0.06 0.09 0.12 0.15 0.18 0.21 0.0000 0.0005 0.0010 0.0015 0.0020 0.0025 0.0030 0.0035 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Cogging Torque [Nm] Vibration Velocity [m/s] d tap [mm] Vibration @ 5,000rpm Cogging Torque 0.0000 0.0005 0.0010 0.0015 0.0020 0.0025 0.0030 0.0035 Total 0fe 2fe 4fe 6fe 8fe 10fe 12fe 14fe 16fe 18fe 20fe 22fe Vibration Velocity [m/s] Time Harmonics Conventional Model Proposed Model Cross-section of conventional model 0.0000 0.0001 0.0002 0.0003 0.0004 0.0005 0.0006 0.0007 4 8 16 20 4 8 16 28 0 12 24 4 8 20 32 4 8 16 Vibration Velocity [m/s] Time Harmonics Conventional Model Proposed Model 2fe 4fe 6fe 8fe 10fe Vibration and cogging torque according to the center point of rotor. Vibration of the proposed model and conventional model Selected Time / Spatial harmonics of the vibration velocity Selected Time / Spatial Harmonics Test Condition : 4Nm @ 5,000rpm In this study, the electromagnetic vibration review process was proposed. Components with a large influence on vibration were derived through influence factors for limited spatial harmonic dimensions and time-space harmonics separation and vibration. To verify the proposed process, the design was evaluated to reduce the electromagnetic vibration by reducing the vibration other than the 2fe component, which constitutes the main frequency. It was verified through experiments. The proposed process is not an electromagnetic-structure interlocking analysis but a method to examine the results of electromagnetic analysis. There is an advantage that vibration can be examined simultaneously in the electromagnetic optimum design process. IV. Test and Verification V. Conclusion Acceleration sensor Recorder Conventional Model Proposed Model Rotor Stator & Housing Motor 0.0000 0.0002 0.0004 0.0006 0.0008 0.0010 0.0012 0.0014 0.0016 0.0018 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 Vibration Velocity [m/s] Frequency [Hz] Conventional Model Proposed Model 6fe 8fe 10fe 12fe 2fe 4fe Test results of the proposed model and conventional model Manufactured prototypes and test equipment settings Test Results Comparison of the test results with the proposed method 0.0000 0.0002 0.0004 0.0006 0.0008 0.0010 0.0012 0.0014 0.0016 0.0018 2fe 4fe 6fe 8fe 10fe 12fe 2fe 4fe 6fe 8fe 10fe 12fe Vibration Velocity [m/s] Time Harmonics Conventional Model Proposed Model Proposed Method Test Results Iksang Jang , Won-ho Kim Design of 8p12s IPMSM for Minimization of Electromagnetic Noise and Vibration

p 2 , cos t P t B , , t B t B t N/m Test Condition : 4Nm @ 5,000rpm /s] · 2019. 10. 1. · 2 0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 /s] nics fe fe fe fe fe fe Time Harmonics 2fe 4fe 6fe 8fe

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Conventional Model

    Impact of Degree of Spatial Harmonics

    by Calculating Natural Frequency

    Prediction of Natural Frequency

    (Mathematical Methods)

    Calculation of Impact of Degree Factor

    of Spatial Harmonics

    Exception Spatial Harmonics

    with Small Impact from the Analysis

    Analysis of Main Vibration Factors

    by Separating Vibration Source

    Time / Spatial Harmonic Separation

    of Radial Force (FEA)

    Extraction of Major Vibration Factor Orders

    Selection of Design Variable

    for Vibration Reduction

    Improved Model

    • Process of the vibration analysis using spatial harmonics and time harmonics of radial force density

    I. Introduction

    In this paper, we propose a process of the vibration analysis using spatial harmonics and time harmonics of radial

    force density as shown in Fig.. For this purpose, this study suggests the impact of degree factor to limit the order of

    spatial harmonics and deduct the component that has a significant influence on vibration through time, spatial

    harmonics separation, and calculation of the vibration. Finally, the vibrations of the conventional model and improved

    model were analyzed, and the validity of the result was verified through the manufactured prototype and vibration test.

    II. Impact of Degree of Spatial Harmonics by Calculating Natural Frequency

    Description Symbol Value Unit

    Peak value of the phase current Imax 14.5 ApkRotation speed - 5000 rpm

    Stator outer diameter Dso 96 mm

    Rotor outer diameter Dro 60 mm

    Airgap length g 0.5 mm

    Stack length Lstk 26.95 mm

    A. Specification of Conventional Model

    B. Prediction of Natural Frequency and Calculation of Impact of Degree Factor of Spatial Harmonics

    ( )21Ω

    2

    11

    cc

    c

    c

    r

    c

    rmr

    E

    RπM

    K

    πf

    −=

    =

    • Circumferential Mode Shape

    • Vibration Velocity for r-th mode

    • Natural Frequency in r-th mode

    ( ) ( ) 222 /2/11

    mrrnmmrrn

    m

    ffζff

    h

    +−

    =

    2

    1

    =

    mr

    mv

    f

    fk

    =

    =1n

    rnr VV

    mrn

    mrc

    stksirnrn hP

    ωM

    LDπfπV

    22=• Vibration Velocity for r-th space harmonics

    and n-th time harmonics

    Mode 3Mode 0 Mode 2Mode 1 Mode 5Mode 4

    • Magnification Factor

    • Vibration Influence Factor

    0

    10,000

    20,000

    30,000

    40,000

    50,000

    0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38

    Na

    tura

    l F

    req

    uen

    cy [

    Hz]

    Circumferential Mode

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3

    Ma

    gn

    ific

    ati

    on

    fa

    ctor

    fr/fm

    ζm = 0.05

    ζm = 0.1

    ζm = 0.2

    ζm = 0.3

    0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1

    0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38

    Vib

    rati

    on

    In

    flu

    ence

    Fa

    cto

    r

    Circumferential Mode

    • Cross-section of conventional model

    III. Analysis of Main Vibration Factors by Seperating the Vibration Source

    A. Time / Spatial Harmonics Separation of Radial Force Density

    ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )tθBμ

    tθBtθBμ

    tθp rtr ,2

    1,,

    2

    1, 2

    0

    22

    0

    −= ( ) ( )

    =

    =

    =0 0

    cos,r n

    e

    rn θrtωnPtθp

    • Radial Force Density

    ωt = π/2 ωt = 3π/4ωt = 0 ωt = π/4

    θ = 0deg

    0

    200

    400

    600

    800

    0 45 90 135 180 225 270 315 360

    Ra

    dia

    l F

    orc

    e D

    ensi

    ty

    [kN

    /m2]

    ωt

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    120

    140

    160

    180

    200

    0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40

    Ra

    dia

    l F

    orc

    e D

    ensi

    ty [

    kN

    /m2]

    Spatial Harmonics

    10fe

    8fe

    6fe

    4fe

    2fe

    0fe

    0.0000

    0.0002

    0.0004

    0.0006

    0.0008

    0.0010

    0.0012

    0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40

    Vib

    rati

    on

    Vel

    oci

    ty [

    m/s

    ]

    Spatial Harmonics

    10fe

    8fe

    6fe

    4fe

    2fe

    0fe

    Time Harmonics

    2fe 4fe 6fe 8fe 10fe

    Spatial

    Harmonics4, 8, 16, 20 4, 16, 28 0, 12, 24 4, 8, 20, 32 4, 8, 16

    B. Extraction of Major Vibration Factor Orders

    C. Improved Design for Vibration Reduction

    RroRtap = Rro – dtap

    dtap

    • Objective Function

    1. Minimizing the cogging torque

    2. 20% reduction in the electromagnetic vibration

    0.0000

    0.0005

    0.0010

    0.0015

    0.0020

    0.0025

    0.0030

    0.0035

    Total 0fe 2fe 4fe 6fe 8fe 10fe 12fe 14fe 16fe 18fe 20fe 22fe

    Vib

    rati

    on

    Vel

    oci

    ty [

    m/s

    ]

    Time Harmonics

    • Time / Spatial harmonic separation of the vibration velocity • Vibration velocity according to the vibration frequency

    0

    0.03

    0.06

    0.09

    0.12

    0.15

    0.18

    0.21

    0.0000

    0.0005

    0.0010

    0.0015

    0.0020

    0.0025

    0.0030

    0.0035

    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

    Co

    gg

    ing

    To

    rqu

    e [N

    m]

    Vib

    rati

    on

    Vel

    oci

    ty [

    m/s

    ]

    dtap [mm]

    Vibration @ 5,000rpm

    Cogging Torque

    0.0000

    0.0005

    0.0010

    0.0015

    0.0020

    0.0025

    0.0030

    0.0035

    Total 0fe 2fe 4fe 6fe 8fe 10fe 12fe 14fe 16fe 18fe 20fe 22fe

    Vib

    rati

    on

    Vel

    oci

    ty [

    m/s

    ]

    Time Harmonics

    Conventional Model

    Proposed Model

    • Cross-section of conventional model

    0.0000

    0.0001

    0.0002

    0.0003

    0.0004

    0.0005

    0.0006

    0.0007

    4 8 16 20 4 8 16 28 0 12 24 4 8 20 32 4 8 16

    Vib

    rati

    on

    Vel

    oci

    ty [

    m/s

    ]

    Time Harmonics

    Conventional Model

    Proposed Model

    2fe 4fe 6fe 8fe 10fe

    • Vibration and cogging torque

    according to the center point of rotor.

    • Vibration of the proposed model and conventional model • Selected Time / Spatial harmonics

    of the vibration velocity

    • Selected Time / Spatial Harmonics

    • Test Condition : 4Nm @ 5,000rpm

    In this study, the electromagnetic vibration review process was proposed. Components with a large influence on

    vibration were derived through influence factors for limited spatial harmonic dimensions and time-space harmonics

    separation and vibration. To verify the proposed process, the design was evaluated to reduce the electromagnetic

    vibration by reducing the vibration other than the 2fe component, which constitutes the main frequency. It was verified

    through experiments.

    The proposed process is not an electromagnetic-structure interlocking analysis but a method to examine the results of

    electromagnetic analysis. There is an advantage that vibration can be examined simultaneously in the electromagnetic

    optimum design process.

    IV. Test and Verification

    V. Conclusion

    Acceleration sensor

    Recorder

    Conventional Model Proposed Model Rotor Stator & Housing

    Motor

    0.0000

    0.0002

    0.0004

    0.0006

    0.0008

    0.0010

    0.0012

    0.0014

    0.0016

    0.0018

    0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500

    Vib

    rati

    on

    Vel

    oci

    ty [

    m/s

    ]

    Frequency [Hz]

    Conventional Model

    Proposed Model

    6fe 8fe 10fe 12fe2fe 4fe

    • Test results of the proposed model and conventional model

    • Manufactured prototypes and test equipment settings

    • Test Results

    • Comparison of the test results with the proposed method

    0.0000

    0.0002

    0.0004

    0.0006

    0.0008

    0.0010

    0.0012

    0.0014

    0.0016

    0.0018

    2fe 4fe 6fe 8fe 10fe 12fe 2fe 4fe 6fe 8fe 10fe 12fe

    Vib

    rati

    on

    Vel

    oci

    ty [

    m/s

    ]

    Time Harmonics

    Conventional Model

    Proposed Model

    Proposed Method Test Results

    Iksang Jang , Won-ho Kim

    Design of 8p12s IPMSM for Minimization of Electromagnetic Noise and Vibration