37
Budget and Management Bureau - A Overview of Overview of Organizational Organizational Performance Performance Indicator Indicator Framework Framework B Director RICALINDA N. ADRIATI DEPARTMENT OF TOURISM 10 September 2008

Overview of Organizational Performance Indicator Framework

  • Upload
    taima

  • View
    121

  • Download
    2

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Overview of Organizational Performance Indicator Framework. DEPARTMENT OF TOURISM 10 September 2008. By: Director RICALINDA N. ADRIATICO. OUTLINE. Organizational Performance Indicator Framework (OPIF) OPIF as key component of Public Expenditure Management (PEM) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Overview of Organizational Performance Indicator Framework

Bu

dg

et

an

d M

an

ag

em

en

t B

ure

au

- A

Overview ofOverview ofOrganizational Organizational Performance Performance

Indicator Indicator FrameworkFramework

By:Director RICALINDA N. ADRIATICO

DEPARTMENT OF TOURISM10 September 2008

Page 2: Overview of Organizational Performance Indicator Framework

Bu

dg

et

an

d M

an

ag

em

en

t B

ure

au

- A

OUTLINEOUTLINE

I. Organizational Performance Indicator Framework (OPIF)

i. OPIF as key component of Public Expenditure Management (PEM)

ii. Logical Framework Approach to OPIF

iii. Performance Indicators

II. DOT’s FY 2008-2009 Budget

Page 3: Overview of Organizational Performance Indicator Framework

Bu

dg

et

an

d M

an

ag

em

en

t B

ure

au

- A

Public Expenditure Management (PEM) is a public sector resource allocation

system that:

Gives reasonable assurance that new expenditures approved for a budget year can be funded over the medium term, and

Accords priority to expenditures that are oriented towards achieving desired outcomes.

Page 4: Overview of Organizational Performance Indicator Framework

Bu

dg

et

an

d M

an

ag

em

en

t B

ure

au

- A

PEM OBJECTIVESPEM OBJECTIVES

Aggregate Fiscal Discipline

- living within our means

Allocative Efficiency

- spending on the “right things” or “right priorities”

Operational/Technical Efficiency

- obtaining the best value for money

Page 5: Overview of Organizational Performance Indicator Framework

Bu

dg

et

an

d M

an

ag

em

en

t B

ure

au

- A

KEY COMPONENTS OF PEMKEY COMPONENTS OF PEM

Medium-Term Expenditure Framework (MTEF)

Organizational Performance Indicator Framework (OPIF)

Accountability/Flexibility Mechanism

Performance Incentives Consequences

Support Mechanism

Page 6: Overview of Organizational Performance Indicator Framework

Bu

dg

et

an

d M

an

ag

em

en

t B

ure

au

- A

Organizational Performance Indicator Framework (OPIF)

A mechanism that induces government agencies to focus their efforts on delivering high/medium priority programs/activities/projects (PAPs) at reasonable cost and qualities.

A set of guidelines and structures for the identification of performance indicators of government organizations.

Page 7: Overview of Organizational Performance Indicator Framework

Bu

dg

et

an

d M

an

ag

em

en

t B

ure

au

- A

The LogframeThe Logframe

Demonstrating a causal link between what you do, why, and how

Page 8: Overview of Organizational Performance Indicator Framework

Bu

dg

et

& M

an

ag

em

en

t B

ure

au

A

Links outcomes and outputs

Systematic and reasoned description Helps relate organizational activities to

its outcomes

What is a Logframe?What is a Logframe?

Page 9: Overview of Organizational Performance Indicator Framework

Bu

dg

et

& M

an

ag

em

en

t B

ure

au

A

Sectoral Goals

Organizational Outcomes

MFOs

P/A/Ps

Societal Goal

Alternative Terminology for OPIFAlternative Terminology for OPIF

OPIF Terms Results Chain

Impacts

Outcomes

Outputs

Activities

Page 10: Overview of Organizational Performance Indicator Framework

Bu

dg

et

& M

an

ag

em

en

t B

ure

au

A Societal GoalsSocietal Goals

Societal benefits derived from cumulative sectoral impacts Highest level of goals – the end points to be aimed for Are longer-term impacts achievable over a long period Influenced by a broad range of factors, some are

beyond agency’s control

Government’s ultimate policy objective, i.e. Government has the primary role in specifying outcomes Medium-Term Philippine Development Plan (MTPDP) or

other policy statements by the President Reflective of the Millennium Development Goals

Page 11: Overview of Organizational Performance Indicator Framework

Bu

dg

et

& M

an

ag

em

en

t B

ure

au

A Societal GoalsSocietal Goals

“Economic growth towards poverty reduction”

Page 12: Overview of Organizational Performance Indicator Framework

Bu

dg

et

& M

an

ag

em

en

t B

ure

au

A Sectoral GoalsSectoral Goals

Longer term sectoral impacts derived from the organizational outcomes

Influenced by a broad range of factors, some are beyond agency’s control

Intermediate, high level end-point leading to the Societal Goal

Government specifics sectoral goals, as intermediate outcomes towards the ultimate societal goals

Page 13: Overview of Organizational Performance Indicator Framework

Bu

dg

et

& M

an

ag

em

en

t B

ure

au

A Sectoral GoalsSectoral Goals

“Increased contribution of tourism to the national economy”

Page 14: Overview of Organizational Performance Indicator Framework

Bu

dg

et

& M

an

ag

em

en

t B

ure

au

A Organizational OutcomesOrganizational Outcomes

Concrete short to medium term impacts on, or benefits to clients and the community

Contribute to achievement of sectoral and societal goals

Departments are able to strongly influence outcomes

Page 15: Overview of Organizational Performance Indicator Framework

Bu

dg

et

& M

an

ag

em

en

t B

ure

au

A Organizational OutcomesOrganizational Outcomes

“Increased international visitors”

“Diversified tourism products and services”

“Increased quality of visitor experience”

“Widen tourism beneficiaries”

Page 16: Overview of Organizational Performance Indicator Framework

Bu

dg

et

& M

an

ag

em

en

t B

ure

au

A Major Final OutputsMajor Final Outputs

Goods and servicesGoods and services that a department or agency is mandated to deliver to external clientsexternal clients, funded by the Budget Consumed outside of the department or agency (i.e., end

user is external) Achieved through implementation of programs, activities

and projects (PAPs)

Contribute directly to attainment of organizational outcomes

Within the controlWithin the control of the department or the agency

Tangible and more easily quantified than outcomes

Page 17: Overview of Organizational Performance Indicator Framework

Bu

dg

et

& M

an

ag

em

en

t B

ure

au

A Major Final OutputsMajor Final Outputs

“Tourism promotion services for international and domestic

visitors”

Page 18: Overview of Organizational Performance Indicator Framework

Bu

dg

et

& M

an

ag

em

en

t B

ure

au

A Programs/Activities/Projects (PAPs)Programs/Activities/Projects (PAPs)

Key activities or integrated group of Key activities or integrated group of activities (programs) and projectsactivities (programs) and projects undertaken by the department/agency to achieve MFOs

Page 19: Overview of Organizational Performance Indicator Framework

Bu

dg

et

& M

an

ag

em

en

t B

ure

au

A

MFO 1 – Tourism promotion services for international and domestic visitors

Participation in international travel fairs, exhibits, and conferences

Public relations and information dissemination Promotion of tour packages Organization and promotion of special events Production of information materials and collaterals Conduct of sales missions

Programs/Activities/Projects (PAPs)Programs/Activities/Projects (PAPs)

Page 20: Overview of Organizational Performance Indicator Framework

Bu

dg

et

& M

an

ag

em

en

t B

ure

au

A

Sectoral Goals

Organizational Outcomes

MFOs

P/A/Ps

Societal Goal

Influence and Accountability in the LOGFRAME

Influence and Accountability in the LOGFRAME

Which leads to…

Which leads to…

Which leads to…

Which leads to…

Incre

as

ing

Ca

pa

city to

Influ

enc

e

Incre

as

ing

Le

vel o

f Acc

ou

ntab

ility

Page 21: Overview of Organizational Performance Indicator Framework

Bu

dg

et

& M

an

ag

em

en

t B

ure

au

A Constructing a LogframeConstructing a Logframe

Can be “top-down”, or “bottom-up” Top down: starting with outcomes and working “down” to

outputs and activities Bottom up: starting with activities and outputs and

working “up” towards outcome

Source documents include: Mandates and legislation Government planning (such as MTPDP, SPM, etc.0 Policies Performance monitoring and/or evaluation reports Departmental planning

Should be produced through a stakeholder consultation process

Page 22: Overview of Organizational Performance Indicator Framework

Bu

dg

et

& M

an

ag

em

en

t B

ure

au

A How is a Logframe Used?How is a Logframe Used?

Tells a story about why, what and how your agency delivers its services

Helps agency focus on core activities that deliver benefits

Helps set priorities for allocating resources by identifying critical outputs and activities

Can be used as the basis for corporate planning

Provides direction towards identification of performance indicators

Page 23: Overview of Organizational Performance Indicator Framework

Bu

dg

et

& M

an

ag

em

en

t B

ure

au

A

NBC 501 (2005) defines performance indicators as:

“performance measures to be used for the assessment of the delivery of MFOs contributing to organizational outcomes”

Performance IndicatorsPerformance Indicators

Page 24: Overview of Organizational Performance Indicator Framework

Bu

dg

et

& M

an

ag

em

en

t B

ure

au

A

Two types of Performance Indicators:For Organizational OutcomesFor MFOs

Performance indicators for MFOs are important, but it is also important to monitor outcomes

Initial focus under OPIF is on performance indicators for MFOs

Performance IndicatorsPerformance Indicators

Page 25: Overview of Organizational Performance Indicator Framework

Bu

dg

et

& M

an

ag

em

en

t B

ure

au

A

HowMuchdid we do?

( # )

HowWell

did we do it?

( % )

Client satisfaction, access, timeliness, accuracy, cost

Quantity Quality

Performance IndicatorsPerformance Indicators

Page 26: Overview of Organizational Performance Indicator Framework

Bu

dg

et

& M

an

ag

em

en

t B

ure

au

A Performance IndicatorsPerformance Indicators

EfficiencyDid we do it right?

EffectivenessDid we do right thing?

Page 27: Overview of Organizational Performance Indicator Framework

Bu

dg

et

& M

an

ag

em

en

t B

ure

au

A

Output Indicators: No. of promotion and information drives

undertaken in key tourist markets No. of media invitees

No. of tour operators accredited

Outcome Indicators: No. of tourist arrivals Tourism receipts No. of jobs generated

Performance IndicatorsPerformance Indicators

Page 28: Overview of Organizational Performance Indicator Framework

Bu

dg

et

& M

an

ag

em

en

t B

ure

au

A

S - S - Specific – relate to results you are trying to achieve

M - M - Measurable – stated in quantifiable terms

A - A - Achievable – realistic in what is to be achieved

R - R - Relevant – logically related to MFO described

T -T - Time-bound – stated with target dates

Characteristics of Good PIsCharacteristics of Good PIs

Page 29: Overview of Organizational Performance Indicator Framework

Bu

dg

et

an

d M

an

ag

em

en

t B

ure

au

- A FY 2008 BudgetFY 2008 Budget

The funds to cover the FY 2008 requirements for 10% Salary Increase10% Salary Increase, including corresponding adjustments in Year-End Benefits (YEB)Year-End Benefits (YEB) and

government counterpart contributions in PHILHEALTH, ECIP and RLIPPHILHEALTH, ECIP and RLIP of national

government personnel pursuant to:

EO No. 611 – effective July 2007, and

EO No. 719 – effective July 2008

SARO – Released the full requirements till December 31, 2008, while

NCA – Released up to September 30, 2008.

Page 30: Overview of Organizational Performance Indicator Framework

Bu

dg

et

an

d M

an

ag

em

en

t B

ure

au

- A FY 2008 BudgetFY 2008 Budget

Amount in Thousand Pesos

P S M O O E C O TOTAL

Appropriation 257,550 1,188,059 27,647 1,473,256

Released Allotment 178,644 699,315 12,169 890,128

Unreleased 78,906 488,744 15,478 583,128

Released Allotment is equivalent to:

PS = January 1 to September 30, 2008

MOOE & CO = Jan. 1 to Mar. 31 (Obligational Authority) plusplus 50% of the Not Needing Clearance (NNC) of the ABM oror April 1 to August 15

requirements

Page 31: Overview of Organizational Performance Indicator Framework

Bu

dg

et

an

d M

an

ag

em

en

t B

ure

au

- A FY 2008 BudgetFY 2008 Budget

Amount in Thousand Pesos

P S M O O E C O TOTAL

For Later Release 59,597 409,914 - 469,511

Needing Clearance 19,309 78,830 15,478 113,617

Unreleased 78,906 488,744 15,478 583,128

“For Later Release” is subject to the results of the Agency Performance Review (APR)Agency Performance Review (APR) as provided under NBC No. 515 dated March 25, 2008, re: Guidelines on the Release of Funds for FY 2008.

Page 32: Overview of Organizational Performance Indicator Framework

Bu

dg

et

an

d M

an

ag

em

en

t B

ure

au

- A FY 2008 BudgetFY 2008 Budget

Results of the APR covering the period January to June, 2008 shall be used as basis in determining the necessity of

additional release of funds to cover the 4th quarter operating requirements of the agency.

The APR shall be based on the submission of the ff:

Budget Execution Documents (BEDs)

Physical and Financial Plan

Monthly Cash Program

Estimate of Monthly Income Budget Accountability Reports (BARs)

Quarterly Physical Report of Operations

Quarterly Financial Report of Operations

Quarterly Report of Actual Income

Statement of Allotment, Obligations and Balances

Monthly Report of Disbursements

Page 33: Overview of Organizational Performance Indicator Framework

Bu

dg

et

an

d M

an

ag

em

en

t B

ure

au

- A FY 2008 BudgetFY 2008 Budget

“Needing Clearance” portions pertains to the Congressional Initiatives which shall be released upon submission of the following:

Endorsement of the following:

Lower House – Speaker of the House and Chairman, Committee on

Appropriations

Upper House – Senate President and Chairman, Committee on Finance

DOT Secretary

Project Profile

Performance Targets/Outputs consistent with the OPIF

Page 34: Overview of Organizational Performance Indicator Framework

Bu

dg

et

an

d M

an

ag

em

en

t B

ure

au

- A

Increase in RATA

KEY POSITIONS

FY 2008 GAA

FY 2009 NEP

Dept. Secretaries 9,500 10,900

Dept. Undersecretaries 7,500 8,600

Dept. Assistant Secretaries 6,700 7,700

Bureau Directors & Dept. Regional Directors 6,000 6,900

Asst. Bureau Directors 5,400 6,500

Asst. Bureau Regional Directors 4,800 6,000

Chief of Divisions 3,500 4,000

FY 2009 BudgetFY 2009 Budget

Page 35: Overview of Organizational Performance Indicator Framework

Bu

dg

et

an

d M

an

ag

em

en

t B

ure

au

- A FYs 2007 - 2009 BudgetFYs 2007 - 2009 Budget

FY 2007 GAA

FY 2008 GAA

FY 2009 NEP

Php1,379,442,000 Php1,473,256,000 Php1,523,284,000

Page 36: Overview of Organizational Performance Indicator Framework

Bu

dg

et

an

d M

an

ag

em

en

t B

ure

au

- A In everything you In everything you

do put GOD do put GOD first, first, and He will direct and He will direct

you you and crown your and crown your efforts efforts

with successwith success

Proverbs 3:6Proverbs 3:6

Page 37: Overview of Organizational Performance Indicator Framework

Bu

dg

et

an

d M

an

ag

em

en

t B

ure

au

- A

Thank You Thank You and and Good Day to Good Day to Everyone!Everyone!